Report on the Society's Excavation of Rough Castle on the Antonine Vallum, by Mungo Buchanan, C.M.S.A. Scot. ; Introductory Hist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Society's Excavation of Rough Castle on the Antonine Vallum, by Mungo Buchanan, C.M.S.A. Scot. ; Introductory Hist 2 44 PROCEEDING E SOCIETY , 19058 TH Y F . O SMA , XI. E REPORSOCIETY'TH N O T S EXCAVATIO F ROUGO N H CASTLN O E ANTONINE TH E VALLUM MUNGY B , O BUCHANAN, C.M.S.A. SCOT; . INTRODUCTORY HISTOK DAVIE D Y YB D CHRISTISON ; DESCKIPTIO E TH F XO REUCS BY DB JOSEPH ANDERSON. (PLATES I., II.) I. HISTORY. As the funds of the Society had been considerably encroached upon in defraying the expenses of excavating Roman sites for a period of eight years, the Council instituted in 1902 a subscription among the Fellows e purposd otherth an r f continuinfo seo g that lin f investigationeo d an , ample funds were thus obtained for the excavation of Rough Castle, leavin gconsiderabla e balanc r favourou n ei . Leave having been freely grante r ForbeM y f Callandedb o s e th d ran Ver . RussellC y . J Rev r , D . proprietor e groundth f o worse th , k began earl continueds Marchyn i wa d without an , no , t some interruption frod mba weather, till October 1903. Several members of the Council kept up a general superintendence, Mr Thomas Ross's great experience being again available in directing the work. Mr Mungo Buchanan once more gave his valuable services in taking the plans, devoting every moment he could spare from his own business to a careful study of the complex structures that were revealed; and Mr Alex. Mackie, who had served us already so wel s Clera l f Worko k n foui s r excavation f Romao s n- re sites s wa , appointed on this occasion. Position Roughof Castle. According to Robert Stuart's chart in Caledonia Rornana, Rough e thirteentCastlth s e Valluewa th line hf th o em for n o countint g from the west, and the seventh counting from the east. Evident remains of nine forts are still to be seen to the west, but nothing exists above ground of the six to the east. Castlecary, the nearest fort on the Vallum, lies 3£ miles westward of Rough Castle ; the station at Camelon, EXCAVATIO ROUGF NO H ANTONINE CASTLTH N O E E VALLUM3 44 . situated 1100 yards in front of the Vallum, is 1| miles to the north-east; and the town of Falkirk lies 2J miles to the east. The fort, consisting of a main work and an annex (fig. 1), stands on a rough boggy bit of moorland, overgrown with trees, near the west end of extensivn a e stri woof po d that stretches nearl milya e eastward towards Falkirk site groun e Th soute itself th .east th d d o hnearls an dt i an , , y level, but northward there is a gentle descent to the bottom of the valley, and to the west a rather steep declivity, about 40 feet in height, falls on the Eowantree Burn. This slope was strongly fortified down to the burn, no doubt to command a water supply, "which was very necessary, as there was apparently no well "within the fort. The north front, e formeAntoninth y b d e Vallum s verwa ,y e othestrongth d r threan , e maie e annexsideth th nf f s o o work , ease d wer wels th en a ,t s ea l also strongly fortified; but the south front of the annex was less protected by art, probably becaus e marshth e y groun n fronti d a considerabl, e obstacle in the present day, was still more of an obstruction formerly. Although a stone bottoming, similar to that of the rampart of the Vallum, extended roun e rampar th e dmai th f no t fort also, thers wa e o tracn f stono e e revetments e forth t d mus an ,e classen b a t s a d earthwork, notwithstanding the statement by some of the early observers f stoneo s tha.wa t i t Former Notices. The early notices of Rough Castle are brief, and contradictory. The earliest is in an anonymous letter describing an excursion to the west of Edinburgh in 1697 (Historical MSS. Com. XIII., App. ii., 57). " Abou mileo tw t s fro Maidee mth n Castl a larg s i ee square worf o k stone with a double ditch about it. The common people hereabouts call t Castlei Ruff. e ruinth Herf severao e s ar e l stone buildings. About e middle squar th th n overtura f s eo ei e thro which shepherd boys creep into a Vault underground." Thu e versth y earliest informant call wora t si f stone ko mentiond an , s a vault, of which, however, we could find no sign. PLAN, or THE ROMAN TORT ON TMC ANTONINC VALLUM. AT ROUGHCASTLE, STIRLINGSHIRE . 1904. U GLACIS !p!p|p;rf!^ ""'i;:'.!•;.;;;, Til Iff ""3j-i- ^..is^iBBSi^ v •""••"- •" PRO nut or THI SURFACE., TMMOUGH rut MILITARY WAY* 6CALt. Mvnyo JSuehttnan t D*t. r,,, ,y., i t , r • r*r » r- fit L HI UK. EXCAVATIO KOUGF NO H ANTONINE CASTLTH N EO B VALLUM5 44 . r JohSi n Sibbald (Historical Inquiries, ) merel170730 . p y, says: " At the Rowen Tree Burn Head is a great Fort." Alexander Gordon (Itinerarium Septentrionale , plat59 1726 . ep , xxv.) state e eass th that n o bant f Koundtreo k e Burn "are th e distinct vestiges of a vast Roman Fort upon the Wall, called Rough Castle, which for intireness and magnificence exceeds any that are to be whole th see n eno Trac ko sea t fro a . mse Her I espen t several hours, taking minutely its dimensions, and an eye Draught of it on the spot, as indeed I did of all the others. One circumstance is very remarkable; Tig. 2. Reduced Plan of Rough Castle by Alexander Gordon, published 1726. namely, thae samth t e Freestone Wall, already mentione t Grimes-(a d dyke, a short distance westward), seems by its foundation here to have surrounded the whole Castellum. I also remarked that the great Ditch of Grimes Dyke is part of its Fortification northwards " Gordon' s planhi f Romal so s al e bespla th f o tnr fa (fig y b . '2)s i forts, but it does not show the freestone wall he speaks of as surround- ing the fort. Something like it is represented at the annex, but as it is outside the trenches, and precisely in the position of the " paved road " r Buchanaii'iM n s s i probablplan e t identifiei b , o t y d with that. Gordon places the ramparts of the main fort between the two trenches 446 PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY, MAY 8, 1905. instead of in their rear, and there are other errors in the details e fortificationoth f e musH .t also have made some mistake wits hi h t scalei woul s a , d requir a pace e abov fee6 en lengti t brino t hs hi g measurements nea truthe th r . It is singular also that he represents a well-defined " Praetorium," divided into compartments e centrannexe th th n f i e,o , wher e founw e d no corresponding building, and he shows no building in the main fort, where we found extensive remains. Horsley (Britannia Romana, 1732 . 173p , ) describe descene th s n o t "e wesEe th oth o wit t n tree-burt we ngroun e gentlew s "th a no d s da an , Fig . Pla3 . Rougf no h Castl Williay eb m Horsley, published 1732. and the fort overgrown with heath. He also says that " No ruins are visible either withi r withouo n e rampartsth t , whic lowee ar h r thaI n should have expected from Mr Gordon's account, but I have endeavoured to give the best notice of the walls and contrivances in the draught." Horsley's plan (fig. 3) is very small and wants a scale. In a general way it is tolerably good, and represents the ramparts and trenches more correctly than Gordon's. Although Horsley says that no ruins were visible, his plan shows in the annex a rectangular enclosed space with an approach from the south, much as Gordon shows his " Prsetorium," but nearer the east side, and with its greatest length from north to south instea frof do m eas westo t . Horsley also give e presumesb whay ma t d EXCAVATIO ROUGF O N H ANTONINE CASTLTH N EO E VALLUM7 44 . e paveth e todb road outside t makebu , t i taks a ewid e sweep beyond the trenches, whic certainls hi errorn ya . Maitland (The History and Antiquities of Scotland, i. 173) briefly and inadequately describes Bough Castle as "a strong fort about 90 paces square, inclosed wit a doublh e rampar d ditcan t h with obtuse angles." Eoy (The Military Antiquities of the Romans in North Britain, p. 161, pi. xxxv.), whose survey was made in 1755, calls Rough Fig . Reduce4 . d Pla f Rougno h Castl Generay eb l Roy, 1755. Castl lase r easternmosteth o t forte existingw th no sf o d state an , s that t "consisti divisionso tw f so , whereo e principath f l seem o havt s e been that towards the west, as it is surrounded with a triple envelope. The easter probabls nwa n additioya r lodginnfo a greateg r bod f troopso y , when on some particular emergency the Wall was repaired, and within it some foundations may be seen." His plan (fig.
Recommended publications
  • Roman Britain
    Roman Britain Hadrian s Wall - History Vallum Hadriani - Historia “ Having completely transformed the soldiers, in royal fashion, he made for Britain, where he set right many things and - the rst to do so - drew a wall along a length of eighty miles to separate barbarians and Romans. (The Augustan History, Hadrian 11.1)” Although we have much epigraphic evidence from the Wall itself, the sole classical literary reference for Hadrian having built the Wall is the passage above, wrien by Aelius Spartianus towards the end of the 3rd century AD. The original concept of a continuous barrier across the Tyne-Solway isthmus, was devised by emperor Hadrian during his visit to Britain in 122AD. His visit had been prompted by the threat of renewed unrest with the Brigantes tribe of northern Britain, and the need was seen to separate this war-like race from the lowland tribes of Scotland, with whom they had allied against Rome during recent troubles. Components of The Wall Hadrian s Wall was a composite military barrier which, in its nal form, comprised six separate elements; 1. A stone wall fronted by a V-shaped ditch. 2. A number of purpose-built stone garrison forti cations; Forts, Milecastles and Turrets. 3. A large earthwork and ditch, built parallel with and to the south of the Wall, known as the Vallum. 4. A metalled road linking the garrison forts, the Roman Military Way . 5. A number of outpost forts built to the north of the Wall and linked to it by road. 6. A series of forts and lookout towers along the Cumbrian coast, the Western Sea Defences .
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucestershire Castles
    Gloucestershire Archives Take One Castle Gloucestershire Castles The first castles in Gloucestershire were built soon after the Norman invasion of 1066. After the Battle of Hastings, the Normans had an urgent need to consolidate the land they had conquered and at the same time provide a secure political and military base to control the country. Castles were an ideal way to do this as not only did they secure newly won lands in military terms (acting as bases for troops and supply bases), they also served as a visible reminder to the local population of the ever-present power and threat of force of their new overlords. Early castles were usually one of three types; a ringwork, a motte or a motte & bailey; A Ringwork was a simple oval or circular earthwork formed of a ditch and bank. A motte was an artificially raised earthwork (made by piling up turf and soil) with a flat top on which was built a wooden tower or ‘keep’ and a protective palisade. A motte & bailey was a combination of a motte with a bailey or walled enclosure that usually but not always enclosed the motte. The keep was the strongest and securest part of a castle and was usually the main place of residence of the lord of the castle, although this changed over time. The name has a complex origin and stems from the Middle English term ‘kype’, meaning basket or cask, after the structure of the early keeps (which resembled tubes). The name ‘keep’ was only used from the 1500s onwards and the contemporary medieval term was ‘donjon’ (an apparent French corruption of the Latin dominarium) although turris, turris castri or magna turris (tower, castle tower and great tower respectively) were also used.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Freshers' Handbook 2016
    Castle Freshers’ Handbook 2016 2 Contents Welcome - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 Your JCR Executive Committee - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 Your International Freshers’ Representatives - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11 Your Male Freshers’ Representatives - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -13 Your Female Freshers’ Representatives- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15 Your Welfare Team - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17 Your Non-Executive Officers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 21 JCR Meetings - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 College Site Plan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 25 Accommodation in College - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -27 What to bring to Durham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -28 College Dictionary - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 29 The Key to the Lowe Library - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 31 Social life in Durham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 33 Our College’s Sports - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 36 Our College’s Societies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -46 Durham Students’ Union and Team Durham - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 52 General
    [Show full text]
  • Spain) ', Journal of Conflict Archaeology, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Fought under the walls of Bergida Citation for published version: Brown, CJ, Torres-martínez, JF, Fernández-götz, M & Martínez-velasco, A 2018, 'Fought under the walls of Bergida: KOCOA analysis of the Roman attack on the Cantabrian oppidum of Monte Bernorio (Spain) ', Journal of Conflict Archaeology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/15740773.2017.1440993 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1080/15740773.2017.1440993 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: Journal of Conflict Archaeology Publisher Rights Statement: This is the accepted version of the following article: Brown, C. J., Torres-martínez, J. F., Fernández-götz, M., & Martínez-velasco, A. (2018). Fought under the walls of Bergida: KOCOA analysis of the Roman attack on the Cantabrian oppidum of Monte Bernorio (Spain) Journal of Conflict Archaeology, 12(2), which has been published in final form at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15740773.2017.1440993 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Settlement Patterns in Roman Galicia
    Settlement Patterns in Roman Galicia: Late Iron Age – Second Century AD Jonathan Wynne Rees Thesis submitted in requirement of fulfilments for the degree of Ph.D. in Archaeology, at the Institute of Archaeology, University College London University of London 2012 1 I, Jonathan Wynne Rees confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the changes which occurred in the cultural landscapes of northwest Iberia, between the end of the Iron Age and the consolidation of the region by both the native elite and imperial authorities during the early Roman empire. As a means to analyse the impact of Roman power on the native peoples of northwest Iberia five study areas in northern Portugal were chosen, which stretch from the mountainous region of Trás-os-Montes near the modern-day Spanish border, moving west to the Tâmega Valley and the Atlantic coastal area. The divergent physical environments, different social practices and political affinities which these diverse regions offer, coupled with differing levels of contact with the Roman world, form the basis for a comparative examination of the area. In seeking to analyse the transformations which took place between the Late pre-Roman Iron Age and the early Roman period historical, archaeological and anthropological approaches from within Iberian academia and beyond were analysed. From these debates, three key questions were formulated, focusing on
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4: INTERIOR BUILDINGS: STOREHOUSES
    CHAPTER IV Interior Buildings: Storehouses, Dwellings The Storehouses ON either side of the Principia there stretched two long narrow buildings supported by heavy buttresses. The actual walls were two and a half feet thick, and the buttresses projected in the building to the south three and a half feet, and in the building to the north two and a half feet beyond. In each case the interior measured one hundred and eighteen feet long by thirty feet wide. The heavy cobble foundations, six feet four inches wide, were carried out to the outside line of the buttresses. Nothing was left to indicate how the roof had been constructed, neither stones nor tiles, but there can be little doubt that the heavy buttressed walls were intended to bear the thrust of an arched roof and that the buildings in question were the horrea, that is, the granaries or storehouses of the fort. The floor was specially constructed to keep the place dry. It was supported on low sleeper walls about seventeen inches thick which ran the whole length of the building. Between each of these walls was a flue or air space one foot in width. Against the west wall of the south building were the remains of a loading platform ten feet long and fourteen inches high. Unfortunately its original width could not be ascertained. The existence of this platform would appear to show that the building was certainly at one period entered from the west. We have a parallel to it in the granaries at Corbridge and Gellygaer, all of which have loading platforms at the entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • About an Early Medieval Settlement in the South of Ancient Tomis
    ABOUT AN EARLY MEDIEVAL SETTLEMENT IN THE SOUTH OF ANCIENT TOMIS Cristina Paraschiv-Talmaţchi DOI: 10.17846/CL.2018.11.1.3-15 Abstract: PARASCHIV-TALMAŢCHI, Cristina. About an early medieval settlement in the south of ancient Tomis. The author makes a brief presentation of the discoveries from the tenth – eleventh century on the territory of Constanța (Constanța County, Romania; Pl. 1: 1), in the perimeter of the ancient settlement of Tomis. Based on these discoveries, it has been assumed until the present the existence of an early medieval settlement named Constantia, approximately within the same limits mentioned in the Byzantine literary sources. Related to the results of new discoveries in 2017, and comparing Tomis archaeological area with the discoveries in the researched site, we suggest a new location of the settlement of Constantia. It lies near a castellum of the stone vallum, in a protected area by the defensive line. Probably the new location of the settlement determined the reason for the Byzantine literary sources to mention it with a new name and not with the former toponym Tomis. Keywords: settlement, Constantia, seals, ceramics, the 10th – 11th centuries, Dobrudja Abstrakt: PARASCHIV-TALMAŢCHI, Cristina. O včasnostredovekom osídlení na juh od an- tického mesta Tomis. Autorka podáva krátku prezentáciu nálezov z 10. až 11. storočia na úze- mí dnešného mesta Konstanca (župa Konstanca, Rumunsko; Pl. 1: 1), na hranici niekdajšie- ho antického osídlenia mesta Tomis. Na základe týchto objavov sa do dneška predpokladá existencia včasnostredovekého osídlenia, nazývaného Constancia, približne v rámci rovna- kých hraníc, ako sú uvedené v byzantských písomných prameňoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Castra, Castrum, Castellum
    Theses of doctoral (Ph. D.) dissertation Balázs Vajner Castra, castrum, castellum Statistics and interpretation consultant: Dr. PÉTER KOVÁCS Pázmány Péter Catholic University Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences PhD School for Linguistics Workshop of Classical Philology Budapest 2015 1 Previous research and problems The ancient terminology of settlement and fortification types is a problematic question. Ancient sources are inconsistent, and whilst modern disciplines like archaeology have their own terminological conventions, these are not necessarily reflecting the way these words where used in antiquity. Furthermore, a significant number of commonly used dictionaries (and occasionally even encyclopaedic works) provide an incomplete or even misleading picture. One of the reasons could be that many of them are largely based on the vocabulary of classical literature – non-literary sources and ancient technical literature are often ignored, or not used to their full potential. Thus, the core idea behind my approach was to find a way to better understand how these words were used in antiquity, both in military and civilian contexts (the latter one is especially important in the case of castellum). From the vast vocabulary of roman military fortifications, the three words: castra, castrum and castellum were selected as target words for several reasons: they are the most fundamental words in the nomenclature of military installations and fortifications; other, more specific terms were often defined in relationship to these words. due to their prevalence, there is a large amount of source material (both literary and non- literary) that can be statistically analysed. the findings of this thesis can be put in broader context by analysing other words using similar or improved methodology, as well as analysing sources that are not discussed in this thesis in detail (e.
    [Show full text]
  • El Castellum De Puigpelat
    Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 1 En conveni amb: Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 2 Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 3 Amb la col·laboració de: Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 4 Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 5 BIBLIOTECA TÀRRACO D’ARQUEOLOGIA EL CASTELLUM DE PUIGPELAT Moisés Díaz García Fundació Privada Liber Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 6 Biblioteca Tàrraco d’Arqueologia, núm. 5 Autor: Moisés Díaz García Traducció a l’anglès: Cristina Fernández Rodríguez Fotografies: Moisés Díaz García - Arxiu CODEX Edita: Fundació Privada Liber. 2009 [email protected] Producció: Diggraf edicions ISBN: 84-613-6235-6 Dipòsit legal: T-1829-2009 Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 7 El castellum de Puigpelat ÍNDEX Pàg. 9 Nota preliminar 11 Presentació 13 Pròleg 17 Introducció 21 Història de la investigació 27 El castellum tardorepublicà de Puigpelat 39 Les evidències del castellum de Puigpelat 59 L’instrumentum domesticum: La vaixella i altres materials 117 Consideracions finals 125 Bibliografia 131 Traducción al castellano 197 English translation 261 Títols publicats per la Biblioteca Tàrraco d’Arqueologia [ 7 ] Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 8 Castellum puigpelat, catala?:castellum puigpelat català.qxd 1/12/09 12:15 Página 9 El castellum de Puigpelat NOTA PRELIMINAR L'ambició de la Biblioteca Tàrraco d’Arqueologia ha estat sempre la de poder editar texts de prestigiosos especialistes així com d'altres que inicien el seu camí científic.
    [Show full text]
  • Illyrian Policy of Rome in the Late Republic and Early Principate
    ILLYRIAN POLICY OF ROME IN THE LATE REPUBLIC AND EARLY PRINCIPATE Danijel Dzino Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics University of Adelaide August 2005 II Table of Contents TITLE PAGE I TABLE OF CONTENTS II ABSTRACT V DECLARATION VI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS VII LIST OF FIGURES VIII LIST OF PLATES AND MAPS IX 1. Introduction, approaches, review of sources and secondary literature 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Rome and Illyricum (a short story) 2 1.3 Methodology 6 1.4.1 Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Policy as an interaction between systems 9 1.4.2 The Illyrian policy of Rome in the context of world-system analysis: Working hypothesis 11 1.5 The stages in the Roman Illyrian relationship (the development of a political/constitutional framework) 16 1.6 Themes and approaches: Illyricum in Roman historiography 18 1.7.1 Literature review: primary sources 21 1.7.2 Literature review: modern works 26 2. Illyricum in Roman foreign policy: historical outline, theoretical approaches and geography 2.1 Introduction 30 2.2 Roman foreign policy: Who made it, how and why was it made, and where did it stop 30 2.3 The instruments of Roman foreign policy 36 2.4 The place of Illyricum in the Mediterranean political landscape 39 2.5 The geography and ethnography of pre-Roman Illyricum 43 III 2.5.1 The Greeks and Celts in Illyricum 44 2.5.2 The Illyrian peoples 47 3. The Illyrian policy of Rome 167 – 60 BC: Illyricum - the realm of bifocality 3.1 Introduction 55 3.2 Prelude: the making of bifocality 56 3.3 The South and Central Adriatic 60 3.4 The North Adriatic 65 3.5 Republican policy in Illyricum before Caesar: the assessment 71 4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Etruscan Castellum: Fortified Settlements and Regional
    Etruscan Studies Journal of the Etruscan Foundation Volume 9 Article 9 2002 The trE uscan Castellum: Fortified ettleS ments and Regional Autonomy in Etruria Hilary W. Becker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies Recommended Citation Becker, Hilary W. (2002) "The trE uscan Castellum: Fortified Settlements and Regional Autonomy in Etruria," Etruscan Studies: Vol. 9 , Article 9. Available at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/etruscan_studies/vol9/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Etruscan Studies by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The EtruscaN CastelluM : Fortified SettLeMeNts aNd RegioNaL AutoNoMy iN Etruria by Hilary W. Becker INde iN FaLiscuM agruM copiis reductis, cuM iMpediMeNta FaLeriis cuM Modico praesidio reLiquisset, expedito agMiNe ad popuLaNdos hostiuM fiNes iNcedit. OMNia ferro igNique vastaN - tur; praedae uNdique actae. Nec soLuM Modo vastuM hosti reLictuM sed casteLLis etiaM vicisque iNLatus igNis: urbibus oppugNaNdis teMperatuM, iN quas tiMor Etruscos coMpuLerat (Livy 10.12.7-8). he accouNts of RoMaN historiaNs describe Etruria as a laNdscape that was pep - pered with differeNt types of settleMeNts raNgiNg froM cities to villages. ExteNsive Tsurveys aNd excavatioNs such as those iN the area of Veii, Falerii, Volterra aNd Fiesole have coNfirMed this variety aNd iNdeed have doNe Much to eNrich our uNder - staNdiNg of Not oNly EtruscaN cities but also of sMaller settleMeNts. 1 It is withiN this lat - ter category that a New group of settleMeNts seeMs to be discerNible oN the basis of archaeological iNvestigatioNs coNducted iN the last 50 years aNd corroborated by the aNcieNt authors theMselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Gisement Protohistorique De Gorge-De-Loup (Vaise - Rhône) : Campagne 1986 Catherine Bellon, Joëlle Burnouf, Jean-Michel Martin, Agnès Vérot-Bourrély
    Le gisement protohistorique de Gorge-de-Loup (Vaise - Rhône) : campagne 1986 Catherine Bellon, Joëlle Burnouf, Jean-Michel Martin, Agnès Vérot-Bourrély To cite this version: Catherine Bellon, Joëlle Burnouf, Jean-Michel Martin, Agnès Vérot-Bourrély. Le gisement protohis- torique de Gorge-de-Loup (Vaise - Rhône) : campagne 1986. Bulletin de l’Association française pour l’étude de l’âge du fer, AFEAF, 1987, 5, pp.16-17. hal-02923069 HAL Id: hal-02923069 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02923069 Submitted on 26 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License 2 LES SANCTUAIRES DU ORONZE rINAL lllb D'ACY-ROMANCE (Ardennes) Fouillé depuis quatre ans, le complexe pro tohistor ique d'Acy-Romance nous a révélé, cette année encore, quelques surprises. L'an dernier 3 inhumations du Bronze Final lia -Ilb, au mobilier archéologique peu commun, étajent découvertes (LAMBOT B. - TALON M. 1987). La campagne 1986 nous a permis d'é tudier 3 sanctuaires du Bronze Final lllb. 1 - SITUATION ET ENVIRONNEMENT ARCHEOLOGIQUE Le finage de la co mmune cl'Acy-Ro mance est particulièrement riche en structures proto­ historiques, pratiquement adjacentes, qui méritent le terme de "complexe protohistorique" (fig.
    [Show full text]