Catalytic Conversion of Chloromethane to Methanol and Dimethyl Ether Over Two Catalytic Beds: a Study of Acid Strength
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 4 n. 3 | p. 083-089 | 2010 | ISSN 1982-0593 CATALYTIC CONVERSION OF CHLOROMETHANE TO METHANOL AND DIMETHYL ETHER OVER TWO CATALYTIC BEDS: A STUDY OF ACID STRENGTH a a a 1 Fernandes, D. R.; Leite, T. C. M., Mota, C. J. A. a Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Química ABSTRACT The catalytic hydrolysis of chloromethane to methanol and dimethyl ether (DME) was studied over metal- exchanged Beta and Mordenite zeolites, acidic MCM-22 and SAPO-5. The use of a second catalytic bed with HZSM-5 zeolite increased the selectivity to DME, due to methanol dehydration on the acid sites. The effect was more significant on catalysts presenting medium and weak acid site distribution, showing that dehydration of methanol to DME is accomplished over sites of higher acid strength. KEYWORDS natural gas conversion; chloromethane; zeolites; methanol; dimethyl ether 1 To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Address: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Instituto de Química. Av Athos da Silveira Ramos 149, CT Bloco A, 21941-909, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil |e-mail: [email protected] doi:10.5419/bjpg2010-0009 83 BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 4 n. 3 | p. 083-089 | 2010 | ISSN 1982-0593 1. INTRODUCTION derivatives, either through direct reaction of natural gas with the halogens, or through The production of methanol and dimethyl ether oxyhalogenation processes, using HCl or HBr and (DME) from natural gas has been the subject of air. In addition, the electrophilic halogenation of great industrial interest. These oxygenates have methane can be performed with the use of Lewis high commercial value, because they can be used acid catalysts, yielding monohalomethane as liquid fuels and raw material for petrochemicals. derivatives in high selectivity (Bucsi and Olah, Besides these two applications, these oxygenates 1992; Olah et al., 1985). Thus, the development of can be used to indirectly transport natural gas, processes of halomethane transformation would avoiding high costs and complex engineering avoid syngas, and may reduce the economical operations of gas pipes and liquefaction, especially drawbacks and high energy consumption in remote regions. associated with natural gas transformation. Methane is the major component of natural gas. Olah and collaborators reported the conversion However, its high thermodynamic stability and of halomethanes to methanol and dimethyl ether reduced reactivity toward most acids, bases and over Al2O3 (Bucsi and Olah, 1992; Olah et al., oxidizing agents, makes the chemical 1985), as well as a non aqueous procedure using transformation of the natural gas a difficult task. copper oxide and SbF5 supported on graphite (Olah The most common pathway for transforming e Bukala, 1990). Zhou and coworkers (2003) natural gas is reforming, which produces syngas, a developed a process to convert methane to mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen (Ross, dimethyl ether involving bromine and metal oxides. 2005). Syngas might then be used in the Fischer- Xu and collaborators (2005) studied a process to Tropsch process (Tijm et al., 2001) to produce convert methane to dimethyl ether by a non syngas gasoline- and diesel-range hydrocarbons, as well as process, through the hydrolysis of bromomethane in methanol production, with the use of copper- on ruthenium catalysts, under batch reaction and zinc-based catalysts (Lersch and Banderman, conditions. 1991). The main problem associated with natural gas reforming is the high endothermicity of the We have studied the interaction of alkylhalides reaction, which demands a great amount of with metal-exchanged zeolites (Correa and Mota, energy, consequently increasing the operation 2002; Franco et al., 2008) and applied this costs. Roughly, about half of the costs of gas to procedure in alkylations (Bidart et al., 2001; liquids (GTL) processes accounts for the syngas Rosenbach and Mota, 2005) and chloromethane production, which might impact the economic transformation to ethene and propene (Noronha feasibility of natural gas transformation in valuable et al., 2005). Recently, we reported a study on the fuel and petrochemical feedstock. catalytic hydrolysis of chloromethane to methanol and dimethyl ether over metal-exchanged zeolite Y Zeolite catalysts can be used to transform (Fernandes et al., 2009). In the present work, we chloromethane into gasoline-range hydrocarbons show that different metal-exchanged zeolites are (Tijm et al., 2001). However, alkyl chlorides are able to hydrolyze chloromethane to methanol and also found as byproducts (White et al., 1992), DME (scheme 1), at mild temperatures and probably arisen from HCl addition to olefins. atmospheric pressure. The DME selectivity could Controlling the reaction conditions and improving be improved with the use of a second catalytic bed catalyst structure favor the reaction to formation packed with HZSM-5. A comparison of product of light olefins (Sun et al, 1993), such as ethene selectivity against the acid strength of the catalyst and propene, as main products, being an was established. alternative pathway for these petrochemicals from Zeolite natural gas. CH3Cl + H2O CH3OH + HCl Zeolite Halogenation of methane is a well-known reaction. Chlorination is exothermic by 24 kcal mol- CH3OCH3 + H2O 1, whereas bromination releases 6 kcal mol-1 of energy. Both reactions can be performed in Scheme 1. Conversion of chloromethane to methanol industrial scale to produce the halomethane and dimethyl ether over zeolite catalyst. 84 BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 4 n. 3 | p. 083-089 | 2010 | ISSN 1982-0593 2. EXPERIMENTAL The catalyst was initially pre-treated under flowing nitrogen (40 mL min-1) at 773 K during 60 minutes, The catalytic hydrolysis of chloromethane was according to a temperature program (room studied over zinc and iron-exchanged Beta (BEA) temperature up to 473 K, remaining at this and copper and iron-exchanged Mordenite (MOR) temperature for 30 minutes, and then up to 773 K, zeolites. The detailed exchange procedure was at 2 K/min). The reactor was then cooled to the reported elsewhere (Franco et al., 1995). In reaction temperature, when the nitrogen flow was addition, the acidic form of MCM-22 zeolite (Si/Al = replaced with a flow (40 mL min-1) of 14) and SAPO-5 (Si/Al = 0.2) were also tested. chloromethane in helium (8 mol %). Water was These molecular sieves were prepared according to simultaneously introduced in the reactor by means literature procedures (Corma et al., 1995). Table 1 of a syringe pump. The water/CHCl3 flow was shows the chemical analysis and textural properties adjusted to achieve a molar ratio of 3. A second of the catalysts used. catalyst bed, packed with HZSM-5 (Si/Al = 14) zeolite, was used, with glass wood separating both Table 1. Chemical and textural analysis of the catalysts. The pre-activation of the catalysts, catalysts. reaction temperature and WHSV were the same as in the case of using only one bed. An U-tube Metal Content BET area packed with CaO was placed just after the reactor Catalyst Si/Al % m2 g-1 to trap the HCl formed and any excess water. In FeBEA 5.2 16 - control experiments, it was shown that neither ZnBEA 5.2 15 - chloromethane, nor oxygenated products were FeMOR 5.2 11 365 significantly adsorbed over the CaO bed at room CuMOR 5.2 20 330 temperature. Product analyses were carried out in MCM-22 14 - - a capillary gas chromatograph using a flame SAPO-5 0.2 - 140 ionization detector and a DB-624 column HZSM-5 14 - 374 (cyanopropyl-phenyl-methyl-polysiloxane). Conversion and selectivity were taken from the chromatographic analyses, after correction for the The catalytic hydrolysis of chloromethane was response factors. Blank reactions were carried out carried out in a continuous flow, fixed-bed unit, by replacing the catalyst bed with glass spheres. coupled on line with a capillary gas chromatograph. Table 2. Hydrolysis of chloromethane over different zeolites at 543 K. WHSV Conversion Selectivity (%) -1 = = + Catalyst Bed (h ) (%) CH3OCH3 CH3OH C2 C3 C4 CuMOR 1 9.13 10.0 11 89 - - - CuMOR/ HZSM-5 2 - 3.7 28 72 - - - FeMOR 1 9.19 4.7 5 79 4 9 3 FeMOR/ HZSM-5 2 - 5.6 23 77 - - - ZnBEA 1 10.4 7.5 23 77 - - - ZnBEA/ HZSM-5 2 - 5.0 24 76 - - - FeBEA 1 9.72 11.0 22 78 - - - FeBEA/ HZSM-5 2 - 4.0 27 73 - - - MCM-22 1 9.68 6.0 7 93 - - - MCM-22/ HZSM-5 2 - 2.5 29 71 - - - SAPO-5 1 8.84 5.0 - 100 - - - SAPO-5/ HZSM-5 2 - 4.5 18 82 - - - Blank - 0.3 - 100 - - - 85 BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 4 n. 3 | p. 083-089 | 2010 | ISSN 1982-0593 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 35 Table 2 shows the results of chloromethane 30 hydrolysis over all catalysts used at 543 K. 25 Compared to the blank reaction, all catalysts were 20 active for chloromethane hydrolysis. Neither 15 10 appreciable deactivation of the catalysts nor % Selectivity, DME 5 selectivity changes were observed during the runs, 0 5 - 22 which normally last 120 minutes. - FeBEA ZnBEA FeMOR SAPO CuMOR Dimethyl ether is normally formed through the MCM acid-catalyzed dehydration of methanol (Xu et al., Figure 1. Selectivity to dimethyl ether using one ( ■ ) 1997). To improve the selectivity to dimethyl ether and two catalytic beds ( ■ ) (DME), we carried out the chloromethane hydrolysis over two catalytic beds, with HZSM-5 zeolite packed in the second bed. Figure 1 shows the results at 543 K. One can see that in all cases The results with the two catalytic beds indicated the DME selectivity was improved, indicating that that methanol dehydration to DME is favored over the methanol formed in the first catalytic bed was Brönsted acid sites present in the HZSM-5 zeolite.