DOCSLIB.ORG

Arnold, Katie Page 1 of 1 22/04/2015 Click Here to Report This Email As Spam

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arnold, Katie Page 1 of 1 22/04/2015 Click Here to Report This Email As Spam Page 1 of 1 Arnold, Katie From: [email protected] Sent: 21 April 2015 00:08 To: [email protected]; Planning Subject: For the attention of Mr Nick Moys. Your ref. 3PL/2015/0384/F Attachments: Rocklands+objection+letter+-+April+2015.doc For the attention of Mr Nick Moys: Case Officer Your ref. 3PL/2015/0384/F Dear Sir, Land to the rear of 'Fredena', Chapel Street, NR17 1UJ Rocklands Erection of 17 dwellings, drainage infrastructure, public open space and associated access I have attended my objection letter. Yours faithfully, Richard A. Golke Click here to report this email as spam. 22/04/2015 Chapel Cottage Chapel Street Rocklands Attleborough Norfolk NR17 1UJ 20 April 2015 For the attention of Mr Nick Moys: Case Officer Your ref. 3PL/2015/0384/F Dear Sir, Land to the rear of 'Fredena', Chapel Street, NR17 1UJ Rocklands Erection of 17 dwellings, drainage infrastructure, public open space and associated access I am writing in response to your recent letter dated 07 April 2015 relating to the above- referenced planning application, to register my very strong objection to the proposed housing development on Chapel Street. My objection is made on the basis of a number of apparent conflictions with existing planning policy recommendations – both local and national - and I will also highlight various anomalies, omissions, contradictions and misrepresentations relating to technical data that is presented in support of the planning application itself. At the same time, I will bring to your attention specific matters of local concern relating to the proposed development that are either ignored or not given appropriate emphasis in the supporting submissions. In presenting my objection, I will reference the following documents: 1) Breckland Council 'Application for Planning Permission' (Planning application ref. 3PL/2015/0384/F) in the name of Mr N. Paske / Bowbridge Land Limited – dated 30/03/2015 2) 'Planning Statement submitted on behalf of Bowbridge Land Limited' prepared by EJW Planning Ltd., Scoulton, Norfolk – dated March 2015 3) 'Design and Access Statement, Chapel Street, Rocklands' prepared by RDC Development Consultants, Creaton, Northants. – dated March 2014 4) 'Phase I Habitat and Protected Species Survey for Proposed Residential Development on Arable Land off Chapel Street, Rocklands, Norfolk, NR17 1UJ' prepared by Eco-Check Consultancy Ltd., Oulton, Norfolk – dated March 2015 5) 'Land at Chapel Street, Rocklands: Foul and Surface Water Drainage Strategy' prepared by Create Consulting Engineers Ltd., Norwich, Norfolk – dated March 2015 6) 'Land at Chapel Street, Rocklands: Transport Statement' prepared by Create Consulting Engineers Ltd., Norwich, Norfolk – dated March 2015 7) 'Archaeological Desk-based Assessment: Land at Chapel Street, Rockland St. Peter, Norfolk' prepared by CgMs Consulting, Newark, Notts. – dated April 2014 Also, where they are quoted in the context of the above-listed reports, the 'National Planning Policy Framework' (March 2012) and the Breckland 'Core Strategy and Development Control Policies' (adopted December 2009). Other technical publications will be referenced in the text as appropriate to the specific issue under discussion; please note that all added emphasis is my own. Firstly, I would like to deal with the data presented in the actual planning application itself. A cursory Internet search reveals that ‘Mr. Paske’ and ‘Bowbridge Land’ are synonymous with ‘Mintridge Consulting Ltd.’ – a Northamptonshire-based firm of Chartered Surveyors. ‘Mr. Norman Charles Paske’ is listed as a Director (Source: ‘Companycheck.co.uk’ - 14/04 2015): He is also listed (as from 25/03/2013) as a Director of Bowbridge Land Ltd. and is additionally described in the ‘Director Overview’ as holding ‘…48 appointments at 46 active companies, has resigned from 14 companies and held 23 appointments at 19 dissolved companies’. On its company website, Mintridge Consulting describes itself as '…a firm of chartered surveyors offering specialist advice and services to developers, landowners and investors, specifically strategic development opportunities and ground rent transactions. We represent several of the UK's largest housebuilders and our investment clients have an active ground rent acquisition fund. If you are a landowner needing advice on development, a housebuilder wanting land, or an investor seeking opportunities in the planning and development sector, then we shall be pleased to speak to you'. The reason I mention this is to underscore one of the primary concerns in the minds of the Rocklands village community (both in St. Peter and in All Saints) and one of the primary reasons why this application should be rejected: Despite all of the usual flowery allusions made in the supplementary documentation describing the supposed care and attention that has been expended in developing this scheme (‘…a high quality development in a sustainable location which will enhance the appearance and setting of the village’; ‘…a low-density development of traditional character and style with external materials reflecting the vernacular of Norfolk’; ‘…a development that is sympathetic to its location and the rural character of the area’) the bottom line, I would suggest, is that Mr. Paske and/or Bowbridge Land care little for the hopes, fears and aspirations of Rocklands, Breckland and – very probably – Norfolk people, except in the context of potential financial enrichment for themselves and their clients. This planning application is being orchestrated by a very experienced, professional property developer and seeks to capitalise on the current, unspoiled charm of the Rocklands village community. At the same time, I would suggest, it is being advanced as a means to determine Breckland Council’s resolve (or otherwise) to uphold local and national planning policy guidelines. Village residents are very much aware that Rocklands is surrounded by open agricultural land, some areas of which have already been the object of previous planning speculation. If this application is approved, it sets a dangerous precedent that will likely open the floodgates for similar development schemes being launched in the future, potentially putting Breckland Council into the unenviable position where such applications are increasingly more difficult to reject (in this respect, I would draw your attention to the proposed road layout within the submitted development area: To me, this clearly suggests a future intent to additionally expand the development to the west and south in the general direction of the B1077 and St. Peter's church). Under such circumstances, the local Parish Council becomes little more than an instrument of toothless compliance with no real say or effective power in the matter of planning issues affecting the local people it represents. As will be discussed later, this outlook directly contravenes core Ministerial statements made in the Foreword to the National Planning Policy Framework. Beyond this initial – and, I would suggest, extremely important consideration – I would draw your attention to Section 9 of the submitted planning application: ‘Foul sewage’. In summary, the application indicates that foul sewage will be disposed of by means of a ‘package treatment plant’ that does not connect either to a ‘mains sewer’ or to ‘the existing drainage system’. This conflicts directly with statements made in the previously referenced Drainage Strategy Report that make no mention whatsoever of onsite treatment; neither does the report provide any details in terms of an outline specification for an appropriate treatment plant. Under the heading 'Proposed Foul Water Drainage Strategy' the report confirms the need only for a pumping station (para. 4.4) 'Based on an assessment of the anticipated site drainage levels and the invert level of Manhole 2001 it is envisaged that a pumped connection will be required' – and this feature is detailed on the associated plan drawing included as part of the attachments to the report. Subsequently, para. 4.6 of the report states that 'Foul flows will then be pumped via the Site access road, along Chapel Street to the east and south and then further south along The Street to the connection point'. As well – and in spite of assurances given by Anglian Water that '...there is capacity in the local network for foul flows from the development' - local residents in All Saints will attest to the fact that the present foul water system cannot reliably deal 24/7 with the output from existing properties that are already connected. A few years ago, this issue formed the basis of several objections to a previous planning application submitted relative to a proposed housing development adjacent to The Street. To quote from an email from one of the residents who lodged an objection: 'I have personally seen the foul water system fail on a number of occasions, causing sewerage to flow into residents' gardens and houses'. From memory, this reflects the situation back in 2007; as far as I am aware, the foul water system has not been modified or upgraded in any way during the interim period. Consequently – and quite rightly - there are obvious concerns on the part of All Saints residents at the prospect of a significant increase in the volume flow that an additional 17 properties will generate. In Section 12 of the submitted planning application - 'Assessment of flood risk' – confirmation is provided (by means of checked boxes) that surface water will be disposed of by means of soakaways and that the proposal will not increase the flood risk elsewhere. I would suggest that, at the very least, this is a problematical assumption given the recorded sub-soil conditions across the proposed development site; the overall topography of the land (falling generally in the direction of All Saints to the south and with the site access falling towards Chapel Street to the north) and the documented history of flooding and of groundwater-related problems experienced by the village in general. The Drainage Strategy Report includes the results of a series of infiltration tests performed in four test pits excavated to a stated depth of 2.0 mbgl representing the full extent of the proposed development area.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parish Share Report
    PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS For period ended 30th September 2019 SUMMARY OF PARISH SHARE PAYMENTS BY DEANERIES Dean Amount % Deanery Share Received for 2019 % Deanery Share % No Outstanding 2018 2019 to period end 2018 Received for 2018 received £ £ £ £ £ Norwich Archdeaconry 06 Norwich East 23,500 4.41 557,186 354,184 63.57 532,380 322,654 60.61 04 Norwich North 47,317 9.36 508,577 333,671 65.61 505,697 335,854 66.41 05 Norwich South 28,950 7.21 409,212 267,621 65.40 401,270 276,984 69.03 Norfolk Archdeaconry 01 Blofield 37,303 11.04 327,284 212,276 64.86 338,033 227,711 67.36 11 Depwade 46,736 16.20 280,831 137,847 49.09 288,484 155,218 53.80 02 Great Yarmouth 44,786 9.37 467,972 283,804 60.65 478,063 278,114 58.18 13 Humbleyard 47,747 11.00 437,949 192,301 43.91 433,952 205,085 47.26 14 Loddon 62,404 19.34 335,571 165,520 49.32 322,731 174,229 53.99 15 Lothingland 21,237 3.90 562,194 381,997 67.95 545,102 401,890 73.73 16 Redenhall 55,930 17.17 339,813 183,032 53.86 325,740 187,989 57.71 09 St Benet 36,663 9.24 380,642 229,484 60.29 396,955 243,433 61.33 17 Thetford & Rockland 31,271 10.39 314,266 182,806 58.17 300,933 192,966 64.12 Lynn Archdeaconry 18 Breckland 45,799 11.97 397,811 233,505 58.70 382,462 239,714 62.68 20 Burnham & Walsingham 63,028 15.65 396,393 241,163 60.84 402,850 256,123 63.58 12 Dereham in Mitford 43,605 12.03 353,955 223,631 63.18 362,376 208,125 57.43 21 Heacham & Rising 24,243 6.74 377,375 245,242 64.99 359,790 242,156 67.30 22 Holt 28,275 8.55 327,646 207,089 63.21 330,766 214,952 64.99 23 Lynn 10,805 3.30 330,152 196,022 59.37 326,964 187,510 57.35 07 Repps 0 0.00 383,729 278,123 72.48 382,728 285,790 74.67 03 08 Ingworth & Sparham 27,983 6.66 425,260 239,965 56.43 420,215 258,960 61.63 727,583 9.28 7,913,818 4,789,282 60.52 7,837,491 4,895,456 62.46 01/10/2019 NORWICH DIOCESAN BOARD OF FINANCE LTD DEANERY HISTORY REPORT MONTH September YEAR 2019 SUMMARY PARISH 2017 OUTST.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Tax Rates 2020 - 2021
    BRECKLAND COUNCIL NOTICE OF SETTING OF COUNCIL TAX Notice is hereby given that on the twenty seventh day of February 2020 Breckland Council, in accordance with Section 30 of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, approved and duly set for the financial year beginning 1st April 2020 and ending on 31st March 2021 the amounts as set out below as the amount of Council Tax for each category of dwelling in the parts of its area listed below. The amounts below for each parish will be the Council Tax payable for the forthcoming year. COUNCIL TAX RATES 2020 - 2021 A B C D E F G H A B C D E F G H NORFOLK COUNTY 944.34 1101.73 1259.12 1416.51 1731.29 2046.07 2360.85 2833.02 KENNINGHALL 1194.35 1393.40 1592.46 1791.52 2189.63 2587.75 2985.86 3583.04 NORFOLK POLICE & LEXHAM 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72 175.38 204.61 233.84 263.07 321.53 379.99 438.45 526.14 CRIME COMMISSIONER BRECKLAND 62.52 72.94 83.36 93.78 114.62 135.46 156.30 187.56 LITCHAM 1214.50 1416.91 1619.33 1821.75 2226.58 2631.41 3036.25 3643.49 LONGHAM 1229.13 1433.99 1638.84 1843.70 2253.41 2663.12 3072.83 3687.40 ASHILL 1212.28 1414.33 1616.37 1818.42 2222.51 2626.61 3030.70 3636.84 LOPHAM NORTH 1192.57 1391.33 1590.09 1788.85 2186.37 2583.90 2981.42 3577.70 ATTLEBOROUGH 1284.23 1498.27 1712.31 1926.35 2354.42 2782.50 3210.58 3852.69 LOPHAM SOUTH 1197.11 1396.63 1596.15 1795.67 2194.71 2593.74 2992.78 3591.34 BANHAM 1204.41 1405.14 1605.87 1806.61 2208.08 2609.55 3011.01 3613.22 LYNFORD 1182.24 1379.28 1576.32 1773.36 2167.44 2561.52 2955.60 3546.72
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of William Falke
    Descendants of William Falke Generation 1 1 1. WILLIAM FALKE was born about 1390 in Pr. Worlingham, Suffolk, England. He died between 20 Feb-05 Mar 1455 in Great Worlingham, Suffolk, England. He married AGNES. Notes for William Falke: William Falke of Worlingham, Suffolk, England is the first known ancestor of the line leading to the Fauxes who are found in large numbers in the area between Thetford and Norwich in Norfolk County from the mid 1500s. It is probably unproductive to speculate about earlier generations. The most that can be said is that it is probable that the family originated in the area and simply disappears into the mists of Medieval time. It is tempting to seek continuity back to Norman times. The first recorded instance of the name Falc or variant is in the "Ship Lists" of the Conquest in 1066. Here one finds, in the Wace contemporary list, "e cil qui est siree d'Alnou". This village is Al(u)nou - le - Faucon, on the Orne River south of Caen near Argentan. The first recorded Seigneur here is "Fulk I d'Aunou" (see Elizabeth Van Houts, 'Wace as Historian', in "The History of the Norman People", Glyn S. Burgess (Ed.), 2004, Boydell Press, Woodbridge, Suffolk, p.L). The Domesday Book of 1086 lists only one Falc, an under tennant at Bradford, Suffolk - although there are more individuals with the name Fulk (Falk and Fulk and their derivatives Falkes and Folkes are frequently used for the same individual). The British Archives site also shows 13th Century examples where the name is for example Robert Le Falke (1284), and others where Henry Faulkes is also known as Henry fliius Falcasiis, and Henry FitzFalk (1307).
    [Show full text]
  • Contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (Are Distinguished by Letter Code, Given Below) Those from 1801-13 Have Also Been Transcribed and Have No Code
    Norfolk Family History Society Norfolk Marriages 1801-1837 The contents of Volume 14 Norwich Marriages 1813-37 (are distinguished by letter code, given below) those from 1801-13 have also been transcribed and have no code. ASt All Saints Hel St. Helen’s MyM St. Mary in the S&J St. Simon & St. And St. Andrew’s Jam St. James’ Marsh Jude Aug St. Augustine’s Jma St. John McC St. Michael Coslany Ste St. Stephen’s Ben St. Benedict’s Maddermarket McP St. Michael at Plea Swi St. Swithen’s JSe St. John Sepulchre McT St. Michael at Thorn Cle St. Clement’s Erh Earlham St. Mary’s Edm St. Edmund’s JTi St. John Timberhill Pau St. Paul’s Etn Eaton St. Andrew’s Eth St. Etheldreda’s Jul St. Julian’s PHu St. Peter Hungate GCo St. George Colegate Law St. Lawrence’s PMa St. Peter Mancroft Hei Heigham St. GTo St. George Mgt St. Margaret’s PpM St. Peter per Bartholomew Tombland MtO St. Martin at Oak Mountergate Lak Lakenham St. John Gil St. Giles’ MtP St. Martin at Palace PSo St. Peter Southgate the Baptist and All Grg St. Gregory’s MyC St. Mary Coslany Sav St. Saviour’s Saints The 25 Suffolk parishes Ashby Burgh Castle (Nfk 1974) Gisleham Kessingland Mutford Barnby Carlton Colville Gorleston (Nfk 1889) Kirkley Oulton Belton (Nfk 1974) Corton Gunton Knettishall Pakefield Blundeston Cove, North Herringfleet Lound Rushmere Bradwell (Nfk 1974) Fritton (Nfk 1974) Hopton (Nfk 1974) Lowestoft Somerleyton The Norfolk parishes 1 Acle 36 Barton Bendish St Andrew 71 Bodham 106 Burlingham St Edmond 141 Colney 2 Alburgh 37 Barton Bendish St Mary 72 Bodney 107 Burlingham
    [Show full text]
  • Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office
    Parish Registers and Transcripts in the Norfolk Record Office This list summarises the Norfolk Record Office’s (NRO’s) holdings of parish (Church of England) registers and of transcripts and other copies of them. Parish Registers The NRO holds registers of baptisms, marriages, burials and banns of marriage for most parishes in the Diocese of Norwich (including Suffolk parishes in and near Lowestoft in the deanery of Lothingland) and part of the Diocese of Ely in south-west Norfolk (parishes in the deanery of Fincham and Feltwell). Some Norfolk parish records remain in the churches, especially more recent registers, which may be still in use. In the extreme west of the county, records for parishes in the deanery of Wisbech Lynn Marshland are deposited in the Wisbech and Fenland Museum, whilst Welney parish records are at the Cambridgeshire Record Office. The covering dates of registers in the following list do not conceal any gaps of more than ten years; for the populous urban parishes (such as Great Yarmouth) smaller gaps are indicated. Whenever microfiche or microfilm copies are available they must be used in place of the original registers, some of which are unfit for production. A few parish registers have been digitally photographed and the images are available on computers in the NRO's searchroom. The digital images were produced as a result of partnership projects with other groups and organizations, so we are not able to supply copies of whole registers (either as hard copies or on CD or in any other digital format), although in most cases we have permission to provide printout copies of individual entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Breckland Definitive Statement of Public Rights Of
    Norfolk County Council Definitive Statement of Public Rights of Way District of Breckland Contains public sector information c Norfolk County Council; Available for re-use under the Open Government Licence v3: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/ Statement downloaded 16th January 2021; latest version available online at: https://www.norfolk.gov.uk/out-and-about-in-norfolk/public-rights-of-way/ map-and-statement-of-public-rights-of-way-in-norfolk/definitive-statements Document compiled by Robert Whittaker; http://robert.mathmos.net/ PARISH OF ASHILL Footpath No. 1 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Houghton Common Road). Starts from fieldgate on South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs eastwards to enter Houghton Common Road opposite western end of Footpath No. 5. Bridleway No. 2 (South Pickenham/Watton Road to Peddars Way). Starts from South Pickenham/Watton Road and runs south westwards and enters Peddars Way by Caudle Hill. Footpath No 5 (Houghton Common to Church Farm) Starts from Houghton Common Road opposite the eastern end of Footpath No. 1 and runs eastwards to TF 880046. From this point onwards the width of the path is 1.5 metres and runs north along the eastern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 94 metres to TF 879047 where it turns to run in an easterly direction along the southern side of a drainage ditch for approximately 275 metres to TF 882048. The path then turns south running on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 116 metres to TF 882046, then turns eastwards to the south of a drainage ditch for approximately 50 metres to TF 883047 where it turns to run southwards on the western side of a drainage ditch for approximately 215 metres to TF 883044 thereafter turning west along the northern side of a drainage ditch and hedge for approximately 120 metres to TF 882044.
    [Show full text]
  • Land East of Rocklands Road, Shropham Development Site for Sale
    Land East of Rocklands Road, Shropham Development Site For Sale Eight Residential Market Shropham is a short drive from the Local Authority: Breckland Council; 5. Tree Survey and Tree Protection A11, with links to Norwich to the north, Elizabeth House, Walpole Loke, Plan Building Plots, and Thetford, Newmarket and Dereham, Norfolk, United Kingdom, 6. Contaminated land assessment Land East of Rocklands Cambridge to the South. NR19 1EE Viewings Road, Shropham, NR17 Description Rights of Way, Wayleaves and Viewings must be strictly by 1DU The land East of Rocklands Road Easements: The sale is subject to all appointment through the sole selling comprises a site of approximately rights of support; public and private agents, Strutt & Parker. 0.64 ha (1.58 ac). rights of way; water; light; drainage; Outline Planning and wayleaves; all or any other like Contact Permission for 8 new build The site comprises the following rights whether mentioned in these Russell de Beer market houses, all of which are particulars or not. Tel: 01603 883620 dwellings with associated detached and benefit from car ports or Mobile: 07889 086 456 parking and garages garages: Directions: From the A11, either Email: travelling north or south, turn off onto [email protected] Attleborough 6 miles; Thetford 9 miles Plot 1: 3 bedroom bungalow: 134m²; the Hargham Road, signposted Norwich 18 miles; Bury St Edmunds Plot 2: 4 bedroom house: 119m²; Shropham, Eccles and Quidenham. Tom Charles 20 miles. Plot 3: 3 bedroom house: 119m²; Continue west on Hargham Road for Tel: 01603 883615 Plot 4: 3 bedroom house: 119m²; approximately 1.9 miles.
    [Show full text]
  • CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – Correct As of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford &A
    CPRE Norfolk Housing Allocation Pledge Signatures – correct as of 24 March 2021 South Norfolk Alburgh Ashby St Mary Barford & Wramplingham Barnham Broom Bawburgh Bergh Apton Bracon Ash and Hethel Brockdish Broome Colney Costessey Cringleford Dickleburgh and Rushall Diss Framingham Pigot Forncett Gissing Great Melton Hempnall Hethersett Hingham Keswick and Intwood Kirby Cane and Ellingham Langley with Hardley Marlingford and Colton Mulbarton Rockland St Mary with Hellington Saxlingham Nethergate Scole Shelfanger Shelton and Hardwick Shotesham Stockton Surlingham Thurlton Thurton Thwaite St Mary Tivetshall St Margaret Tivetshall St Mary Trowse with Newton Winfarthing Wreningham Broadland Acle Attlebridge Beighton Blofield Brandiston Buxton with Lamas Cantley, Limpenhoe and Southwood Coltishall Drayton Felthorpe Frettenham Great Witchingham Hainford Hemblington Hevingham Honingham Horsford Horsham St Faiths Lingwood and Burlingham Reedham Reepham Ringland Salhouse Stratton Strawless Strumpshaw Swannington with Alderford and Little Witchingham Upton with Fishley Weston Longville Wood Dalling Woodbastwick Total = 72 Total parishes in Broadland & South Norfolk = 181 % signed = 39.8% Breckland Ashill Banham Bintree Carbrooke Caston Colkirk Cranworth East Tuddenham Foulden Garveston, Reymerston & Thuxton Gooderstone Great Ellingham Harling Hockering Lyng Merton Mundford North Tuddenham Ovington Rocklands Roudham & Larling Saham Toney Scoulton Stow Bedon & Breckles Swaffham Weeting with Broomhill Whinburgh & Westfield Wretham Yaxham Great Yarmouth
    [Show full text]
  • Hingham Map Book
    Hardingham Kimberley Cranworth GNLP0501 GNLP0503 GNLP0544 GNLP0502 Wicklewood GNLP0298 GNLP0520 GNLP0310 GNLP0335 GNLP0395 Hingham GNLP0273 Deopham Scoulton Morley Little Ellingham Rocklands © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Great Ellingham Date created: Legend 31-03-2017 Greater Norwich Local Plan Hingham ParishesBoundary 1:30,631 This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] ± Hingham GNLP0544 AD RO M HA ING RD HA © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Hingham 31-03-2017 Greater Norwich Local Plan GNLP0544 Legend 1:2,000 This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] Hardlingham Road Parish Boundary ± E NORWICH ROAD N A L S R E G N I R Y RY W A GRANA H O P S A C K E RIV R D ERS O LST A MA D E C N O O A L P E S R R S CRESCENT A E B BARL D EYFIE A LD R O GNLP0520 Hingham BEA RS C LO SE GNLP0310 R E N R O C S E L A L M I E M R E R O A D © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 Date created: Hingham 31-03-2017 Greater Norwich Local Plan GNLP0520 Legend 1:2,324 This map was made by the Norfolk County Council Information Exploitation Team [email protected] Land to the south of Norwich Road Parish Boundary ± D E R E H A M R O A D GNLP0503 Hingham RIVE UIR D M PRIMROSE ROAD GNLP0502 GNLP0501 ACRE ROAD EN E R G ELL E D © Crown copyright and database rights 2017 Ordnance Survey 100019340 TH Date created: Hingham 31-03-2017 Greater Norwich
    [Show full text]
  • Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk
    Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore of Suffolk and Norfolk Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study SKIDMORE, SKITMORE AND SCUDAMORE FAMILIES OF SUFFOLK AND NORFOLK by Linda Moffatt ©2016 CITATION Please respect the author's contribution and state where you found this information if you quote it. Suggested citation 'Skidmore, Skitmore and Scudamore Families of Suffolk and Norfolk by Linda Moffatt at the website of the Skidmore/ Scudamore One-Name Study www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com'. Minor changes were made to this account by Linda Moffatt on 25 July 2017. DATES • Prior to 1752 the year began on 25 March (Lady Day). In order to avoid confusion, a date which in the modern calendar would be written 2 February 1714 is written 2 February 1713/4 - i.e. the baptism, marriage or burial occurred in the 3 months (January, February and the first 3 weeks of March) of 1713 which 'rolled over' into what in a modern calendar would be 1714. • Civil registration was introduced in England and Wales in 1837 and records were archived quarterly; hence, for example, 'born in 1840Q1' the author here uses to mean that the birth took place in January, February or March of 1840. For an individual born after 1837, where only a baptism date is given, assume the birth was registered in the same quarter but the exact date of birth is not presently known. BIRTHS, MARRIAGES AND DEATHS Databases of all known Skidmore and Scudamore bmds can be found at ww.skidmorefamilyhistory.com PROBATE A list of all known Skidmore and Scudamore wills - many with full transcription or an abstract of its contents - can be found at www.skidmorefamilyhistory.com in the file Skidmore/Scudamore One-Name Study Probate.
    [Show full text]
  • NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL Propose to Make a Temporary
    NORFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL proposes to make a Temporary Traffic Order affecting the B1077 Attleborough Road from 87m northwest of its junction with U33114 Deopham Road for 350m south-eastwards in the PARISH OF GREAT ELLINGHAM because of resurfacing works for new roundabout. The road will be temporarily closed (except for access) from 27th August to 10th September 2021 for the duration of the works expected to be about 14 days within the period. Alternative route is via: Westbound – B1077 Watton Road/Attleborough Road/Brayes Lane/Caston Road/Carbrooke Road/Caston Road, B1108 Norwich Road, A1075 Memorial Way/Thetford Road/Watton Road, B1111 Watton Road/Road from Larling to Watton/Harling Road/Watton Road, C106 Illington Road, A11, B1077 Ellingham Road/Attleborough Road. Eastbound – B1077 Attleborough Road/Ellingham Road/Queens Road, U33119 Blackthorn Road, A11, B1111 Road from Larling to Bridgham/Watton Road/Harling Road/Road from Larling to Watton/Watton Road, A1075 Watton Road/Thetford Road/Memorial Way, B1108 Norwich Road, B1077 Caston Road/Carbrooke Road/Caston Road/Brayes Lane/Attleborough Road/Watton Road (Thompson, Carbrooke, Hockham, Caston, Stow Bedon, Griston, Rocklands, Roudham and Larling, Attleborough, Great Ellingham, Shropham, Watton). (If necessary the restriction could run for a maximum period of 18 months from the date of the Order). Penalty: £1000 maximum fine on conviction and/or endorsement for contravention. In the event of the start date being delayed the new start date will be displayed on site in advance. The person dealing with enquiries at Norfolk County Council is Harvey Woodyatt (Community and Environmental Services) Telephone 0344 800 8020.
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk Map Books
    Scoulton Wicklewood Hingham Wymondham Division Arrangements for Deopham Little Ellingham Attleborough Morley Hingham County District Final Recommendations Spooners Row Yare & Necton Parish Great Ellingham Besthorpe Rocklands Attleborough Attleborough Bunwell Shropham The Brecks West Depwade Carleton Rode Old Buckenham Snetterton Guiltcross Quidenham 00.375 0.75 1.5 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD New Buckenham 100049926 2016 Tibenham Bylaugh Beetley Mileham Division Arrangements for Dereham North & Scarning Swanton Morley Hoe Elsing County District Longham Beeston with Bittering Launditch Final Recommendations Parish Gressenhall North Tuddenham Wendling Dereham Fransham Dereham North & Scarning Dereham South Scarning Mattishall Elmham & Mattishall Necton Yaxham Whinburgh & Westfield Bradenham Yare & Necton Shipdham Garvestone 00.425 0.85 1.7 Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD Holme Hale 100049926 2016 Cranworth Gressenhall Dereham North & Scarning Launditch Division Arrangements for Dereham South County District Final Recommendations Parish Dereham Scarning Dereham South Yaxham Elmham & Mattishall Shipdham Whinburgh & Westfield 00.125 0.25 0.5 Yare & Necton Kilometers Contains OS data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 © Crown copyright and database rights 2016 OSGD 100049926 2016 Sculthorpe Fakenham Erpingham Kettlestone Fulmodeston Hindolveston Thurning Erpingham
    [Show full text]