Internal Displacement in Sudan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Internal Displacement in Sudan Internal Displacement in Sudan Background paper prepared for the Mission to Sudan of the Senior Inter-Agency Network on Internal Displacement 2-13 April 2002 Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 0700 Fax: + 41 22 799 0701 E-mail : [email protected] Briefing paper for Sudan mission 2-13 April 2002 2 ______________________________________________________________________ Introduction More than thirty years of civil war and inter tribal conflicts have caused tremendous suffering for the civilian Sudanese population. Since the conflict escalated in 1983 there have been an estimated two million war-related deaths and reliable sources estimate that 4 million or more remain internally displaced – with little prospect for large-scale returns in the near future. During recent years there has been a major expansion of oil production inside the conflict area. This has become closely linked with increased displacement as civilians have been forced to move as the conflict has escalated in these areas. Access problems in areas such as the Nuba Mountains, Bahr al Ghazal, Western Upper Nile/Unity State, Eastern Equatoria and southern Blue Nile continuously limit the opportunity to reach the displaced with humanitarian assistance, and there are regular reports of IDPs being exposed to gross violations of fundamental human rights and the rules of war – including relief facilities being targeted by aerial bombing (ICG 2002 p3; UN November 2001 p52). Common problems of quantifying IDP populations is further complicated in Sudan by traditional nomadic migration patterns, as well as movements related to people searching for emergency assistance due to sustained drought problems and even occasional floods. The latest comprehensive estimate of displacement in Southern Sudan dates back to USAID's survey in 1994, which confirmed the presence of 1,5 million IDPs (Ruiz 1998 p153). The UN has estimated the distribution of IDPs within Government-controlled areas as follows: some 1.8 million IDPs in the Khartoum State, 500 000 in the east and the "transition zone", and 300 000 in the southern states; in SPLM/A-controlled territories, it estimates there are 1.4 IDPs (UNCHR 5 February 2002). Although the civil war in Sudan is commonly depicted as one between the Muslim North versus the Christian and animist South, many casualties over the past years occurred as a result of inter-tribal conflicts (such as between the Dinka and the Nuer ethnic groups and within those groups). The civil war has no single battlefront, but fighting and atrocities against civilians take place in several different conflict areas. This has created a very complex and fluid displacement situation (Christian Aid May 2001). Even if the civil war has a religious dimension, major geo-political and economic issues cannot be overlooked especially in the current phase when displacement has become closely linked to conflict over resources (ICG 2002 p93; IRIN 14 November 2001 pp1, 3; Christian Aid 17 May 2001 p2). Main causes for conflict-induced displacement The conflict involves numerous armed factions, including the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A), – which merged with the Sudan People’s Defence Forces (SPDF) in 2001 – the Government's Sudanese Army and its Popular Defence Forces (composed of various tribal militias), in addition to several individual groups of armed militias, – partly at war and partly in alliance with the Government or fighting each other. The Government of Sudan has commonly used ethnic divide-and-rule tactics to weaken the southern-based opposition forces, for example by sowing tensions between the Nuer and the Dinka ethnic groups in the oil regions (ICG 2002 pp.129-133). Direct exposure of civilians to military activities by the various armed factions is the main cause behind displacement in Sudan. Military action with a clear intent to displace civilians has been a common pattern and practice by armed forces on both sides of the conflict. Control of Briefing paper for Sudan mission 2-13 April 2002 3 ______________________________________________________________________ territory has been a main reason for the fighting, but the acquisition of resources and assets from civilians, or the denial of resources to the opposing side have been the dominant aspects of the war. Attacks on civilian settlements to disrupt recruitment to the various militias, and forced relocation have also characterized the conflict (Hendrie 1996; OCHA 28 September 1999). Abduction of civilians is the most extreme form of displacement in Sudan. It has been reported that as many as 12,000 remained abducted by end-2000 (US DOS February 2001 sect.1b), and that this practice has continued despite several initiatives to stop it. For example, by the beginning of 2001, Government militias escorting a military convoy killed civilians and abducted between 200 and 400 children and women in villages near Wau (UN November 2001). Major displacement of civilians has also paved the way for the recruitment of child soldiers – which has been practiced by both Government affiliated forces and rebel groups (ICG 2002 p4). Although SPLM/A handed over 3,500 child-soldiers to UNICEF in February 2001, there still remains between 4,000 and 6,000 to demobilize and return to their homes (UNICEF 29 August 2001; UN November 2001 p82). In Eastern Equatoria, attacks from the Ugandan Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), traditionally affiliated with forces loyal to the government of Sudan, have displaced many people. The LRA has an appalling human rights record that includes abduction of civilians and forced recruitment of child soldiers (JRS 7 April 2001). Since 1989 displacement has increasingly been related to the expanding oil exploration and extraction in the Unity State (Western Upper Nile) and Upper Nile areas, as well as in areas crossed by the oil pipelines (ICG 2002 pp132-133; AI 3 May 2000; Christian Aid 15 March 2001; Harker January 2000). The strategy by the Government to protect the oil production has included use of loyal militias to depopulate the oil-rich areas by extremely violent means, including looting and burning villages, killing and abducting (ICG 2002 pp133, 136). In addition, civilians are often caught between the fighting of rivalling militias seeking to establish themselves in these areas (ICG 2002 p135). These attacks have intensified during 2001 and there have been reports that access roads and airstrips built by the oil-companies have been used by the perpetrators (ICG 2002 p136). According to IMF figures, military expenditure doubled to US$ 327 million between 1998-2000, and while oil production revenues are soaring to $900 million per year, human rights observers stress that no visible development is benefiting the southern populations (CAID May 2001; IRIN 11 July 2001; IRIN 14 November 2001). Recent developments During 2001 violent conflicts continued unabated in the Nuba Mountains, the states of Unity, Upper Nile, Bahr al Ghazal, Eastern Equatoria and southern Blue Nile. These conflicts force civilians to flee both within the same states as well as seeking refuge in neighbouring states (UN November 2001). The IDP situation has worsened since 2001, especially as conflict escalated in West Bahr al Ghazal, causing major displacements particularly form Raga town. Although there has been some unilateral and temporary cease-fires put in place by the GoS and the SPLM/A since 1998, they were not renewed in 2001 or were violated shortly after being declared (UN November 2001). The Nuba Mountains, once Sudan's breadbasket, has since long been the theatre of unresolved armed conflict. The Government has since the early 1990s created so-called 'peace Briefing paper for Sudan mission 2-13 April 2002 4 ______________________________________________________________________ villages' in areas under their control, where Nuba communities from areas contested with the SPLA have been forcefully moved to. During the first half of 2001 the Government launched an offensive in the Nuba Mountains. In May 2001 militia troops systematically ransacked and burned 2500 homes, forcibly displacing more people into "peace villages"(IRIN 4 June 2001). As areas controlled by the rebels diminish, the civilians are forced to flee higher into the mountains, where cultivation on the steep slopes is fruitless, and where they are cut off from humanitarian assistance. Available reports show that during 2001 and 2002 new displacement took place especially in the following areas: January 2001: Civilians displaced from Nuba Mountains took refuge in south Khordofan state as fighting between the GoS and SPLA escalated (ACT 21 March 2001). May 2001: 50,000 displaced in the Nuba Mountains because of attacks by Government troops (IRIN 23 July 2001). June 2001: Civilians flee SPLA offensive and the capture of the towns of Daim Zubeir and Raga in Bahr al Ghazal; 30,000 IDPs fled towards Timsaha and 8000 towards Ed Daein (OCHA 10 June 2001). Second half of 2001: 5000 IDPs from Raga town in Bahr al Ghazal who initially had taken refuge in Timsaha, were forced to flee a second time after GoS declared it a military area (IRIN 22 January 2002). September 2001: 7,600 IDPs in camps in Northern Bahr al Ghazal (USAID, September 2001) Frequent displacements due to PDF/Muraheleen raids into northern Bahr al Ghazal mainly along the Babanusa/Wau railway line (UN August 2001). July 2001: 4,576 new arrivals in Wau town, (Bahr Al Ghazal) caused by Murahleen militia raids. Total population in IDP camps numbering at 50,560 (OCHA 31 July 2001). January 2002: 16,000 new IDPs in Awoda Wau County fled from Bahr al Ghazal (IRIN 22 January 2002). March 2001: Arrival of over 12,000 new IDPs into Bentiu (Unity State) as fighting in the oil-rich area escalated (OCHA 31 March 2001). UN estimated in 2000 e number of IDPs around Bentiu at up to 40.000.
Recommended publications
  • Sudan: Humanitarian Crisis, Peace Talks, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy
    Order Code IB98043 CRS Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Sudan: Humanitarian Crisis, Peace Talks, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy Updated June 9, 2005 Ted Dagne Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS The Crisis in Darfur: Background The Humanitarian Situation and the U.S. Response The African Union and the Crisis in Darfur Prospects for a Negotiated Settlement in Darfur The IGAD Peace Process: Background The Machakos Negotiations Recent Developments The Humanitarian Crisis (South Sudan) U.S. Response Sudan and Terrorism Sudan: Religious Persecution The United States and Sudan The Bush Administration and Current Policy Debate LEGISLATION IB98043 06-09-05 Sudan: Humanitarian Crisis, Peace Talks, Terrorism, and U.S. Policy SUMMARY Sudan, geographically the largest country Blue Nile, and on the long disputed Abyei in Africa, has been ravaged by civil war inter- area. The signing of these protocols resolved mittently for 4 decades. An estimated 2 mil- all outstanding issues between the parties. On lion people have died over the past two de- June 5, 2004, the parties signed “the Nairobi cades due to war-related causes and famine, Declaration on the Final Phase of Peace in the and millions have been displaced from their Sudan.” On January 9, 2005, the government homes. of Sudan and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement signed the final peace agreement at The relief operation in southern Sudan is a ceremony held in Nairobi, Kenya. The being coordinated by Operation Lifeline signing of the Sudan Comprehensive Peace Sudan (OLS), established in 1989 in response Agreement effectively ended the 21-year old to the 1988 humanitarian crisis in which over civil war and triggered a six-year Interim 200,000 people died of starvation.
    [Show full text]
  • AGAINST the GRAIN: the Cereal Trade in Darfur
    DECEMBER 2014 Strengthening the humanity and dignity of people in crisis through knowledge and practice AGAINST THE GRAIN: The Cereal Trade in Darfur Margie Buchanan-Smith, Abdul Jabar Abdulla Fadul, Abdul Rahman Tahir, Musa Adam Ismail, Nadia Ibrahim Ahmed, Mohamed Zakaria, Zakaria Yagoub Kaja, El Hadi Abdulrahman Aldou, Mohamed Ibrahim Hussein Abdulmawla, Abdalla Ali Hassan, Yahia Mohamed Awad Elkareem, Laura James, Susanne Jaspars Empowered lives. lives. Resilient nations.nations. Cover photo: cereal market in El Fashir ©2014 Feinstein International Center. All Rights Reserved. Fair use of this copyrighted material includes its use for non-commercial educational purposes, such as teaching, scholarship, research, criticism, commentary, and news reporting. Unless otherwise noted, those who wish to reproduce text and image files from this publication for such uses may do so without the Feinstein International Center’s express permission. However, all commercial use of this material and/or reproduction that alters its meaning or intent, without the express permission of the Feinstein International Center, is prohibited. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the United Nations, including UNDP, WFP or their Member States. Feinstein International Center Tufts University 114 Curtis Street Somerville, MA 02144 USA tel: +1 617.627.3423 fax: +1 617.627.3428 fic.tufts.edu 2 Feinstein International Center Acknowledgements The research team would particularly like to
    [Show full text]
  • Put out to Pasture War, Oil and the Decline of Misseriyya Humr Pastoralism in Sudan
    hpghpg hpg HumanitarianHumanitarian Humanitarian PolicyPolicy Group Group Policy Group Put out to pasture War, oil and the decline of Misseriyya Humr pastoralism in Sudan Sara Pantuliano, Omer Egemi, Babo Fadlalla and Mohammed Farah with Mohammed Elamin Abdelgadir March 2009 ISBN: 978 0 85003 896 5 9 78085 0 038965 Misseriyya cover.indd 1 6/4/09 8:31:11 am About the authors Sara Pantuliano is a Programme Leader and Research Fellow with the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) at the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Omer Egemi is Assistant Professor at the Department of Geography at the University of Khartoum. Babo Fadlalla is a Professor at the College of Forestry and Range Sciences at the Sudan University of Science and Technology in Khartoum. Mohammed Farah is a Researcher at the Social and Economic Research Institute in the Ministry of Science and Technology in Khartoum. Mohammed Elamin Abdelgadir is a Consultant for the Three Areas for USAID/OTI in Khartoum. Humanitarian Policy Group Overseas Development Institute 111 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7JD United Kingdom Tel: +44(0) 20 7922 0300 Fax: +44(0) 20 7922 0399 Website: www.odi.org.uk/hpg Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978 0 85003 896 5 Misseriyya cover.indd 2 6/4/09 8:31:12 am misseriyya report crc 13/5/09 8:02 pm Page i Contents Acknowledgements Acronyms v 1. Introduction and methodology 1 1.1 Background 1 2. Livelihoods under stress: chronic vulnerability and adaptive changes 3 2.1 Main livelihood profiles in Dar Misseriyya 3 2.2 External shocks 5 2.3 Changes in livelihoods strategies 7 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Repression in Sudan
    Sudan Page 1 of 243 BEHIND THE RED LINE Political Repression in Sudan Human Rights Watch/Africa Human Rights Watch Copyright © May 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-75962 ISBN 1-56432-164-9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was researched and written by Human Rights Watch Counsel Jemera Rone. Human Rights Watch Leonard H. Sandler Fellow Brian Owsley also conducted research with Ms. Rone during a mission to Khartoum, Sudan, from May 1-June 13, 1995, at the invitation of the Sudanese government. Interviews in Khartoum with nongovernment people and agencies were conducted in private, as agreed with the government before the mission began. Private individuals and groups requested anonymity because of fear of government reprisals. Interviews in Juba, the largest town in the south, were not private and were controlled by Sudan Security, which terminated the visit prematurely. Other interviews were conducted in the United States, Cairo, London and elsewhere after the end of the mission. Ms. Rone conducted further research in Kenya and southern Sudan from March 5-20, 1995. The report was edited by Deputy Program Director Michael McClintock and Human Rights Watch/Africa Executive Director Peter Takirambudde. Acting Counsel Dinah PoKempner reviewed sections of the manuscript and Associate Kerry McArthur provided production assistance. This report could not have been written without the assistance of many Sudanese whose names cannot be disclosed. CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Human Security in Sudan: the Report of a Canadian Assessment Mission
    Human Security in Sudan: The Report of a Canadian Assessment Mission Prepared for the Minister of Foreign Affairs Ottawa, January 2000 Disclaimer: This report was prepared by Mr. John Harker for the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. The views and opinions contained in this report are not necessarily those of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. 1 Human Security in Sudan: Executive Summary 1 Introduction On October 26, 1999, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Lloyd Axworthy and the Minister for International Co-operation, Maria Minna, announced several Canadian initiatives to bolster international efforts backing a negotiated settlement to the 43-year civil war in Sudan, including the announcement of an assessment mission to Sudan to examine allegations about human rights abuses, including the practice of slavery. There are few other parts of the world where human security is so lacking, and where the need for peace and security - precursors to sustainable development - is so pronounced. Canada's commitment to human security, particularly the protection of civilians in armed conflict, provides a clear basis for its involvement in Sudan and its support for the peace process. Charm Offensive, or Signs of Progress? Following the visit to Khartoum of an EU Mission, a political dialogue was launched by the European Union on November 11 1999. The EU was of the view that there has been sufficient progress in Sudan to warrant a renewed dialogue. In this view, there has been a positive change, and it is necessary to encourage the Sudanese, and push them further where there is need.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Supplementary Appeal for Sudan
    2004 SUPPLEMENTARY APPEAL FOR SUDAN Preparatory activities for the repatriation and reintegration of Sudanese refugees TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND AND MAJOR DEVELOPMENTS............................................................3 II. THE CURRENT PEACE PROCESS.................................................................................4 III. OUTLOOK FOR REFUGEE RETURN..............................................................................5 IV. CURRENT SITUATION IN AREAS OF RETURN IN SOUTHERN SUDAN.....................6 V. OVERALL PROGRAMME APPROACH FOR 2004..........................................................7 VI. STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES ..............................................................................................8 VII. OPERATIONS – PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS .................................................................9 VIII. BENEFICIARY PLANNING FIGURES............................................................................10 IX. FRAMEWORK FOR CO-ORDINATION AND PARTNERSHIP ......................................10 X. PROTECTION AND HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE....................................................11 XI. BUDGET..........................................................................................................................16 ANNEXES - MAPS: - Expected Repatriation Movements, Southern Sudan - Sudanese Refugees in DRC, Ethiopia, Kenya and Uganda disaggregated by district
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets File:///C:/Documents and Settings/Brendelt/Desktop/Temp Rir/CHRONO
    Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/CHRONO... Français Home Contact Us Help Search canada.gc.ca Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets Home Issue Paper SUDAN CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS APRIL 1993-APRIL 1995 August 1995 Disclaimer This document was prepared by the Research Directorate of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. This document is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed or conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. For further information on current developments, please contact the Research Directorate. Table of Contents MAP GLOSSARY INTRODUCTION CHRONOLOGY 1993 1994 1995 APPENDIX I: LIST OF STATES IN SUDAN APPENDIX II: NOTES ON SOURCES REFERENCES MAP See original. 1 of 33 9/17/2013 9:25 AM Issue Papers, Extended Responses and Country Fact Sheets file:///C:/Documents and Settings/brendelt/Desktop/temp rir/CHRONO... Source: Peter Woodward. 1990. Sudan, 1898-1989: The Unstable State. Boulder Co: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., vi. Map information provided by Dr. A. Trilsbach. Department of Geography, University of Durham. GLOSSARY ASNF Alliance of Sudanese National Forces DUP Democratic Unionist Party IGADD Inter-Governmental Authority on Drought and Development NDA National Democratic Alliance NIF National Islamic Front PDF Popular Defence Forces
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Lifeline Sudan
    49 ORIGINAL ARTICLE J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.28.1.49 on 1 February 2002. Downloaded from Operation Lifeline Sudan S D Taylor-Robinson ............................................................................................................................. J Med Ethics 2002;28:49–51 The provision of aid in war zones can be fraught with political difficulties and may itself foster inequali- ties, as it is rare to be allowed access to civilians on both sides of a conflict. Over the past decade, a United Nations (UN) brokered agreement has allowed Operation Lifeline Sudan (OLS), a UN “umbrella” organisation, to provide the diplomatic cover and operational support to allow long term humanitarian and emergency food aid to both the government and the rebel sides in the long-running south Sudanese civil war. Over the years, the destruction of infrastructure in the country has meant that the provision of basic health care has been seriously hampered. Operation Lifeline Sudan has coordi- nated the work of most of the non-governmental organisations (NGOs), working in this part of Africa. ....................... Each NGO has had responsibility for a particular area of the country and has worked closely with the local Sudanese authorities on either side of the conflict, conforming to strict codes of conduct or Correspondence to: Dr S D Taylor-Robinson, “ground rules”, based on neutrality. Operation Lifeline Sudan has provided an air-bridge for Gastroenterology Unit, emergency relief supplies in regions where road access is impossible, either because of landmines, or Imperial College School of simply because the roads do not exist. The war continues, however, and the underlying causes of Medicine, Hammersmith war—economic exploitation, marginalisation of communities, lack of political representation, and sys- Hospital, Du Cane Road, tematic violence and abuse remain unsolved.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudanese Refugees in Sudan's East Darfur Fact Sheet As at June
    EAST DARFUR FACT SHEET AS AT JUNE 2018 ABOUT WORLD VISION Map of East Darfur State World Vision is an international Christian humanitarian, development and advocacy organisation. Our work began in the 1950s, with one man, Bob Pierce, who witnessed tragedy and poverty in Asia. Bob Pierce committed to help one child in one country with just US$5. SHEIRIA Today, World Vision has operations in nearly 100 countries worldwide responding to the call of serving the world’s most vulnerable regardless of religion, race, ethnicity, or gender. YASSIN ED DAEIN ABU KARINKA IN SUDAN Ed Daein ADILA ASSALAYA World Vision has its head office in Khartoum (the capital city). We operate in three states namely: Blue Nile, East Darfur, South Darfur which accounts for EL FERDOUS approximately 80 per cent of the total annual budget and most recently-South Kordofan. Our programmes address immediate humanitarian needs of vulnerable ABU JABRA communities while building longer term resilience and adaptation through recovery interventions. BAHR EL ARAB ! Key interventions are in health and nutrition, Water, Sanitation and Hygiene ! (WASH), food security and sustainable livelihoods, education, child care and gender. Highlighted in orange: Localities where World Vision also provides emergency food assistance through the support of the World Vision is currently operating. World Food Programme (WFP). Our work benefits Host Communities, Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs), Refugees, as well as Returnees. About East Darfur East Darfur has an estimated 2.7 million people. It is semi-arid in the southern part and arid in the northern part. East Darfur receives rainfall between June and October and is predominantly agro-pastoralist.
    [Show full text]
  • UNSG Report on UNAMID
    United Nations S/2019/44 Security Council Distr.: General 14 January 2019 Original: English African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur Report of the Secretary-General I. Introduction 1. The present report is submitted pursuant to Security Council resolution 2429 (2018), by which the Council extended the mandate of the African Union-United Nations Hybrid Operation in Darfur (UNAMID) until 30 June 2019 and requested me to report, every 90 days, on its implementation. The report provides an update on and analysis of the conflict, the political situation and the operational environment in Darfur for the period from 4 October 2018 to 3 January 2019. It outlines activities undertaken in accordance with the indicators of achievement for the benchmarks for the mission’s exit and highlights the main challenges to the effective implementation of the mandate. It also provides an update on the progress made by UNAMID in implementing the recommendations contained in the special report of the Chairperson of the African Union Commission and the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the strategic review of UNAMID (S/2018/530). II. Conflict analysis 2. The security situation in Darfur has remained relatively stable, except for intermittent clashes between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Sudan Liberation Army/Abdul Wahid (SLA/AW) faction in Jebel Marra that resulted in civilian displacement. No major episodes of intercommunal violence were reported. Incidents of crop destruction, which often spark local-level confrontations, were also on the decline. The reduction in the number of incidents of intercommunal violence corresponds to the overall decrease in counter-insurgency operations and associated militia mobilization, in addition to the concerted efforts of UNAMID, the United Nations country team, national and local authorities and communities to resolve disputes and pursue peaceful coexistence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Sudan John K
    Distributing Food Aid as a Civilization is Dismantled: The Case of Sudan John K. Morris The southern Sudanese comprise 30 Cet article examine la situation des "refugies de l'interieur" dans un pays oh la percent of the population consisting of guerre civile oppose depuis de nombreuses annees le Nord contre le Sud et oh two main groups: the Nilotic group of la famine menace constammentles plus pauvres. Au-dela des effets de la guerre cattle-herding Dinka, Nuer and et de la famine, l'auteur evoque les changements dans les droits fomiers qui, Shilluk whose animals graze the cen- dans l'ensemble du pays, ont prive des agriculteurs et des eleveurs de leurs tral grassland of the south; and the terres au profit de grandes plantations mecanisees privees. L'extension et la Christians and animists, who cultivate multiplication de ces vastes domaines, tres visibles dans le paysage, sont the wooded lands along the borders of fortement encourages par le gouvernement en raison de leur contribution aux the country. exportations des cultures de rente. L'auteur decrit ensuite les evhements qui Sudan has a complex demographic jalonnent la periode recente du conflit et les succes et obstacles que rencontrent make-up that has been reduced to a les organisations humanitaires pour distribuer l'assistance dans un pays d4- North-South dualism supported by chire par la guerre civile. racial, ethnic, cultural and religious differences, with correspondingpoliti- Introduction organizations (INGOs) have faced in cal and economic disparities. The trying to get aid to those who are in north comprises two-thirds of the land The rains in southern Sudan usually need.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY the Scope and Depth of the Operation Lifeline Sudan
    SUMMARY The scope and depth of the Operation Lifeline Sudan Review has meant that any summary can only be partial. While attempting to draw out some of the key points, what follows cannot be interpreted as a substitute for the main text. Introduction This is the first comprehensive review of Operation Lifeline Sudan (OLS) in its seven year history. The Review is an entirely independent undertaking, funded by donor governments and supported administratively by the UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs (DHA). The main impetus for the Review came from OLS's growing difficulties, especially associated with access, during 1995. The Review does not attempt an exhaustive evaluation of the impact of OLS, its individual agencies, or its various programmes. Its main focus, rather, is on the relationship between OLS's creation of humanitarian space, and the flow of assistance to war-affected populations. The Review therefore sets out to assess and analyse the effectiveness of the OLS modus operandi in meeting the needs of war-affected civilians. International Significance OLS has regional, national, and global significance. Created in 1989, it was the first humanitarian programme that sought to assist internally displaced and war-affected civilians during an ongoing conflict within a sovereign country, as opposed to refugees beyond its borders. The experience of OLS has been important in the evolution of humanitarian policy and conflict management; it established a precedent for many humanitarian interventions that followed, for example in Angola, Iraq, Somalia, and Bosnia. As such, the Review has significance beyond Sudan, and complements other debates on humanitarian aid - for example, those stimulated by the Joint Evaluation of Emergency Assistance to Rwanda.
    [Show full text]