If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.

U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice

This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions statee; in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by New York State Department of Correctional Services to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyright owner.

",

~' • '11 .. Thom.as A. CoughUn III' .' Coml'niSsiqner ..\1', THE HUB SYSTEM: PROFILE OF INMATE POPULATION UNDERCUSTODY ON JANUARY 1, 1992

The New York State Department of Correctional Services is reorganizing the delivery of program services to the inmate population. One of the important components of this plan is grouping the correctional facilities by geographical proximity into administrative regions. This report presents a prorIle of the inmate population within each region.

DIVISION OF PROGRAM PLANNING, RESEARCH AND EVALUATION

1992

Prepared by: William R. Chapman Robert L. Fimer -i-

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The New York State Department of Correctional Servics is reorganizing the delivery of program services to the inmate population. One of the important components of this plan is grouping the correctional facilities by geographical proximity into administrative regions. This report presents a profile of the inmate popUlation within each region. This executive summary briefly describes the characteristics of the total undercustody population and then presents the range of values found across the ten administrative clusters 011 a selected set of variables.

Characteristic Variable Total Undercustody Range Across Clusters Low High

Gender % female 5.8% 0.0% 33.4%

Age average age 31.3 yrs. 27.9 33.6

Race/ethnic % white 16.2% 12.2% 20.5% % black !)O.l % 47.7% 52.9% & hispanic 32.0% 26.7% 36.5% All other 1.7% 1.1% 3.4%

Region % from NYC 69.6% 57.7% 79.4%

Birthplace % foreign born 12.4% 8.4% 16.4%

Marital Status % never married 59.9% 52.2% 68.8%

Living Children % with one or more living children 56.0% 46.4% 62.6%

Religious Aff. % catholic 39.5% similar across the clusters % protestant 30.4% % islam 16.5% % other 2.7% % no designation 9.3% % not coded 1.7%

Veteran Status % veteran 7.7% 5.4% 8.6%

Minimum Sentence median minimum sentence in months 36.0 mos. 24.0 72.0

Crime % violent felony 51.9% 35.8% 65.0%

Second felony % second felony 54.8% 45.9% 67.0% offender status -ii-

Characteristic Variable Total Undercustody Range Across Clusters Low High

Prior adult % with prior 27.9% 23.1% 31.6% criminal record prison term

Time served median time 5.5 mos. 4.6 8.5 at current fac. served in months

Time served in mediall time 15.2 mos. 8.8 33.0 department custody served in months

Estimated time to median time to 15.3 7.8 30.8 earliest release release in months

Reading level % testing at 7th grade or below English language dominant 31.8% 26.3% 34.3% Spanish language dominant 52.7% 38.2% 61.8%

Math Proficiency % testing at 7th grade or below English language dominant 34.0% 29.4% 39.2% Spanish language dominant 43.1% 38.0% 57.3%

Academic Degree % with verified high school diploma or above 32.7% 24.6% 43.7%

English language prof. % Spanish language dominant 10.3% 6.7% 12.8%

Alcoholism % alcoholic on MAST test 27.6% 23.8% 30.5%

Drug Use % reporting past use of cocaine/crack cocaine: 36.8% 28.0% 47.4% narcotics: 9.5% 6.9% 13.0%

Inmate Security Status % classified maximum security 30.7% 0% 59.0% -iii-

THE HUB SYSTEM: PROFILE OF INMATE POPULATION UNDERCUSTODY ON JANUARY 1, 1992

Table of Contents

************t~****************************************************************

Executive Summary ...... 1 Table of Contents ...... 111

Introduction ...... 1

1. Demographic Characteristics

Gender ...... 5 Age ...... 7 Race/Ethnic ...... 10 Region ...... 12 Birthplace ...... 14 Marital Status ...... 16 Number of Living Children ...... 18 Religious Affiliation ...... 20 Veteran Status ...... , .. 22

2. Criminal History

Minimum Sentence ...... 24

Crime 'I ...... 27 Predicate Felony Sentencing Status ...... 31 Prior Adult Criminal Record ...... 33 Length of Time Served at Current Facility ...... 35 Length of Time in Department Custody ...... 38 Estimated Time to Earliest Release ...... 41

3. Program Relevant Characteristics

Reading Proficiency ...... ,...... 44 Math Proficiency ...... 49 Academic Degree Status ...... 54 English Language Proficiency ...... 57 Alcoholism ...... 59 Drug Use ...... ~ ...... " 61 Inmate Security Classification ...... ,...... 63 Inmate Central Monitoring Status ...... 65 ------~-

THE HUB SYSTEM: PROFILE OF INMATE POPULATION UNDERCUSTODY ON JANUARY 1,1992

INTRODUCTION

The New York State Department of Correctional Services is reorganizing the delivery of program services to the inmate population. One of the important components of this plan is grouping the correctional facilities by geographical proximity into administrative regions. These administrative regions are referred to as clusters, each cluster is a group of neighboring facilities that will share administrative, support and program services. Each cluster has a core or "HUB" facility at which inmates are received and from which inmate movement and other administrative service delivery functions are controlled.

Administrative Changes

The HUB system offers administrative efficiencies and the opportunity to implement new thinking on the educational training, vocational training, therapeutic treatment and work experience of inmates during the time they are in Department custody. 1 Administrative efficiency results from shared functions. Purchasing and stores are centralized, training in specialized areas (e.g. masonry, auto mechanics, printing, plumbing, small engine repair) is available within the HUB and not at each correctional facility, facilities share services of specialized inmate work crews (e.g. for painting, roofing, building,), and inmate orientation and assessment and later on pre-release services are performed only at one facility in the HUB. 2 Further savings are obtained by inmate crews performing routine maintenance and construction and repair work. In addition, most inmates will serve the large majority of their sentence within the cluster which will reduce costs of transfl.rring inmates and will reduce the disruption in the inmate's program plan.

lDetaUs of this plan are preuentcd in "Division of Program Services Action Plan 1991" (1991) and "Program Plan for Fiscal Year 92-93" (1992), New York State Department of Correctional Services, Albany, New York 12206.

2Sce "Action Plan 1991" p.S, p.9. -2-

New Inmate Program Model

In conjunction with regionalization of administrative se,rvices the Department is implementing new goals and new procedures with respect to inmate programs. These goals include:

(a) full day inmate programming (b) mandatory educational training through the eighth grade (c) intensive alcohol and substance abuse treatment (d) a new approach to inmate labor (e) creation of an education and work climate closer to that found outside the prison (f) greater responsibility on th~ part of the inmate for his program career while in custody.

Full Program Day

Inmates will have a full program day. Following assessment of educational and vocational skills, treatment needs, and inmate vocational aspirations, a program plan will be established based on a four time module day (some facilities may retain a 3 time module day). Inmates will be permitted two paid modules per day (for 5 days a week) for a combination of education (up to 8th grade), vocational training or work crew assignments. Unpaid modules will include education in pursuit of a G.E.D., therapeutic programs, involvement in inmate organizations, or recreation programs.

Mandatory Schooling

For those inmates with reading and writing skills below 8th grade, educational training is mandatory. Those who read below 5th grade must attend school full time, those between 5th and 8th grade must attend half time (or one paid module). Inmates who demonstrate above 8th grade reading levels are strongly encouraged to complete a G.E.D., an accomplishment that will 'enable the inmate to obtain higher paying work assignments, will contribute toward an Earned Eligibility Certificate3 and will promote educational and employment opportunity upon release from custody.

3n1e Earned Eligibility Program provides for the relcaoc ofinmatcs at their parole eligibility date if they satisfactorily complete certain prescribed programs and work asaignmcnts (see "Earned Eligibility Program Statistical Report July 1987 through September 1991" (1992) and "Earned Eligibility Program Sununary (1992), New York State Department of Correctional Services. '. ~~---~------

-3-

Drug and Alcohol Treatment

Given the prevalence of alcoholism and the use of controlled substances among people committed to state prison4 the Department has expanded its alcohol and substance abuse treatment program and has developed a specialized intensive six month treatment program that operates at five correctional facilities which are dedicated to this specific program.s

Work As&ignments

The shift in the approach to work assignments involves training the inmate in a skill that can be applied to facility maintenance or construction, to an assignment in Correction Industries, to work assignments for improvement projects in local communities or in conjunction with other state agencies. The Department is committed to development of a sufficient number of real work assignments such that every inmate not in school and who has been trained in a skill will receive a job assignment.

Stress on Inmate Responsibility

The program plan also calls for more responsibility on the inmate for the success of his career while incarcerated and greater stress on a program model that more closely approximates the outside community. The program is geared to educational training for those below 8th grade level, then vocational training in a particular skill (taking into consideration Department needs and the inmate's vocational aptitude and skills), then a job assignment. Higher wages are paid for jobs requiring more education and skill. Inmates will compete with peers for these jobs. On personal responsibility, the plan states that for each inmate:

. . . compliance with and progress through his program plan will (1) bring about better (higher paid, more pleasant, and more prestigious) prison work assignments and (2) get him out of prison sooner, either by satisfying his Earned Eligibility Program requirements or otherwise favorably

impressing the Board of Parole II (program Services Action Plan 1991, p. 16).

4See "Identified Male Substance Abusers", (April 1992), New York State Department of Correctional Scrviccs.

SScc "Comprchclll!ivc Alcohol and Substance Abuse Treatmcnt Program· (1991) New York State Department of Correctional Services. -4-

Purpose of the Report

The sections below profile the inmate population in each cluster as well as the population at each of the correctional facilities within the cluster. This profJ.1e contains information on demographic characteristics and on other variables that may be relevant to implementing these new concepts in inmate programming. These data are meant to acquaint staff at each HUB with the overall characteristics of inmates in the cluster population as well as with differences in the characteristics of the inmate popUlation at each of the respective facilities in the cluster.

This information also serves as baseline data on the characteristics of the inmate population at the initiation of the HUB system and the new model for delivery of program services. It is impormnt to have a baseline against which to assess inmate progress in achieving the goals of the HUB plan.

Finally, the report also serves as a profile of the undercustody population at the end of calendar year 1991.

In the tables and graphs presented in the report each cluster is identified by number (1 through 10) and by the HUB facility for that cluster. Staff often refer to each cluster by the HUB facility for that cluster (e.g. cluster #1 referred to as "Oneida HUB"). The HUB facility for each cluster (along with a short abbreviation used in graphic displays) is as follows: Cluster 1, Oneida C.F. (ONI); Cluster 2, Watertown C.F. (WAT); Cluster 3, Clinton C.F. (CLI); Cluster 4, Sullivan C.F. (SUL); Cluster 5, Sing-Sing C.F. (SS); Cluster 6, Green Haven C.F. (GH); Cluster 7, Great Meadow C.F. (GM); Cluster 8, Attica C.F. (ATT); Cluster 9, Auburn C.F. (AUB); Cluster 10, Queensboro C.F. (NYC). Appendix A presents a map showing the 10 regional clusters and the correctional facilities within each. -5-

Section One

DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS

Gender Distribution

There were 57,907 inmates undercustody on January 1, 1992, of whom 54,526 (94.2%) were men and 3,381 (5.8%) were women (see Table 1).

Females are present in five of the ten clusters. The percentage of a cluster's total population that is made up by women inmates ranges from 0 to a high of 33.4% in cluster 5 (Sing Sing Hub, which includes Bedford Hills). Further, the proportion' of new commitments to the Department made up by women offenders has grown in recent years (4.0% of offenders in 1985 compared with 9.4% in 1991).6 Facilities housing women offenders are widely distributed across the state and women offenders may require somewhat different programs and services than men.?

Figure 1 Percent Women Offenders in Each Cluster

35

30

25 P ~ 20 c • ~ 15

10

5

1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 II 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM All Aub NYC Pop Cluater

6See "Characteristics of New Court Commitments 1991". (1992), Division of Progrsm Planning, Research and Evaluation, New York Slate Department of Correctional Services.

?See "Progrsm Services Action Plan 1991" p.ll. -6-

TABLE 1. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY GENDER OF INHATE; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER HALE FEHALE TOTAl. ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 0 182 HARCY 14(.1 0 1441 HID-STATE 1380 0 1380 HOHAWK 1207 0 1207 ONIEDA 1083 0 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 77 0 77 SUMMIT SHOCK FEM 0 90 90 TOTAL 5370 90 5460 98.4% 1 .. (,% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 0 789 OGDENSBURG 799 0 799 WATERTOWN 816 n 816 TOTAL 2404 0 2404 100.0% .0% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 0 612 ALTONA 731 0 731 BARE HILL 1545 0 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 302 0 302 CHATEAUGAV ASACT 129 0 129 CLINTON 2787 0 2787 FRANKLIN 1543 0 1543 LYON MOUNTAIN 160 0 160 TOTAL 7809 0 7809 100.0% .0% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUD (4) EASTERN 1141 0 1141 SHAWANClUNK 541 0 541 SULI.IVAN 722 0 722 ULSTER 798 0 798 WALLKILL 550 0 550 WOODBOURNE 895 0 895 TOTAL 4647 0 4647 100.0% .0% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 0 736 736 SING SING 2264 0 2264 TACONIC 0 401 401 TOTAL 2264 1137 3401 66.6% 33.4% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEH 0 219 219 DOWNSTATE 1642 0 1642 FISHKILL 1797 0 1797 GREEN HAVEN 2067 0 2067 HID-ORANGE 673 0 673 OTISVILLE 628 0 628 TOTAL 6807 219 7026 96.9% 3.1% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 281 0 281 CO)(SACKIE 959 0 959 GREAT HEADOW 1544 0 1544 GREENE 1538 0 1538 HUDSON 449 0 449 HUDSON WORK REL 96 0 96 HORIAH SHOCK 154 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 554 0 554 WASHINGTON 1084 0 1084 TOTAL 6659 0 6659 100.0% .0% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (81 ALBION FEHALE 0 1162 1162 ATTICA 2086 0 2086 COLLINS 1133 0 1133 GROVELAND 976 0 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 0 300 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 0 118 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 0 74 LIVINGSTON 788 0 788 ORLEANS 1293 0 1293 WENDE 788 0 788 WYOMING 1640 0 1640 TOTAL 9424 1580 11004 85.6% 14.4% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1711 0 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 177 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 123 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 259 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 207 0 207 CAYUGA 794 0 794 ELHIRA 1765 0 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 167 0 167 ROCHESTER 199 0 199 SOUTHI'ORT 686 0 686 TOTAL 6088 0 6088 100.0% .0% 100.0% HEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 0 891 BAYVIEW 0 165 165 BAVVIE~ WORK REL 0 87 87 EDGECOHBE 458 0 458 FULTON 444 G 444 LINCOLN 398 0 398 PARKSIDE 0 103 103 QUEENSBORO 863 0 863 TOTAL 3054 355 3409 89.6% 10.4;: 100.0% QRAND TOTAL 54526 3381 57907 91•• 2% 5.8% 100.'% -7-

Age Distribution

Table 2 shows the age distribution by cluster. The largest cohort are persons 25- 29 years old (15,010, 25.9%). Next in number is the age cohort 30-34 years with 12,897 (22.3%).

Sixteen to eighteen year old inmates, to whom the State is responsible for providing schooling, constitute 1.9% (1,113) of the total undercustody population as of January 1, 1992. However, in only three clusters are there at least 100 such inmates. Numerically, cluster 7, with 452, and cluster 9, with 286, have the most 16-18 year old inmates. Clusters 2 and 5 have the fewest inmates in the 16-18 age category (with 12 and 22 inmates respectively). For programmatic and other purposes the Department has increased the concentration of younger inmates at selected facilities (see figure 2). The average and median age of inmates housed at each facility is presented in Table 2B. The higher concentration of younger inmates in cluster ..- 7 and cluster 9 helps to lower the average age of inmates in these clusters compared with the overall population.

The elderly, tlM)Se sixty or over, constitute less than one percent (0.8%, N=479) of inmates undercustody. Because of their age, inmates in this cohort are more likely to have infirmity and illness than are other populations. The elderly are less likely to seek employment when they leave. Consequently, they present different service neeqs differert from those of other inmates. Clusters 8 and 6 each have nearly 100 such persons undercustody (105 and 96 respectively).

Figure 2 Percent Age 24 and Under

50

40

p e 30 r c e n 20 t

10

1 2 3 " 5 6 7 8 II 10 Totel Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH OM All Autl NYC Pop Clueler

-- ~------'. -8-

TABLE 2. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY AGE ON JANUARY 1, 1992; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER CURRENT AGE TOTAL AND FACILITY 16-18 19-20 21-24 25-29 30"34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65 AND YR YR YR YR YR YR YR YR YR YR YR OVER ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 2 12 29 74 3& 15 4 7 0 0 1 0 182 HARCY 13 21 263 390 377 190 102 50 19 8 3 5 1441 HID-STATE 3 13 241 346 352 207 lOCi 54 24 11 12 8 1380 HOHAWK 5 20 177 326 308 178 103 42 26 10 7 5 1207 ONIEDA 5 8 189 294 254 169 80 43 23 12 (, 0 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 8 15 33 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 SUHHIT'SHOCK FEH 1 4 33 50 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 TOTAL 37 93 965 1501 1331 759 398 196 92 41 29 18 5460 .7% 1.7% 17.7% 27.5Y. 24.4Y. 13.9Y. 7.3Y. 3.6Y. 1.7% .8Y. .5Y. .3Y. 100.0Y. WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 5 17 138 Z59 188 92 54 23 3 6 0 4 789 OGDENSBURG 3 7 153 243 204 98 49 22 15 4 1 0 799 WATERTOWN 4 6 153 235 205 114 56 24 7 7 2 3 816 TOTAL 12 30 444 737 597 304 159 69 25 17 3 7 2404 .5Y. 1.2Y. 18.5Y. 30.7Y. 24.8Y. 12.6Y. 6.6Y. 2.9Y. 1.0Y. .7% .1Y. .3Y. 100.0Y. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 5 8 110 202 128 82 38 19 12 4 3 1 612 ALTONA 4 12 146 202 200 88 44 20 11 1 3 0 731 BARE HILL 4 12 294 535 325 198 82 52 31 7 5 0 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 1 2 73 96 80 26 14 6 3 1 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 0 0 33 48 25 15 . 6 2 0 0 0 0 129 CLINTON 9 46 393 783 646 439 234 129 62 29 10 7 2787 FRANKLIN 5 15 287 493 347 200 105 51 24 11 3 2 1543 LYON NOUNTAIN 0 0 29 49 45 20 10 6 1 0 0 0 160 TOTAL 28 95 1365 2408 1796 1068 533 285 144 53 24 10 7809 .4Y. 1.2Y. 17.5Y. 30.3Y. 23.0Y. 13.7% 6.8Y. 3.6Y. 1.8Y. .7% .3Y. .1Y. 100.0Y. SULLWAN HUB (4) EA::::TERN 0 12 101 254 303 210 144 73 18 16 6 4 1141 S!"i\WANGU~K 1 2 ~9 129 137 98 65 28 :?3 8 8 3 541 SL!LLIVAN 2 8 73 162 177 134 93 42 14 11 3 3 722 ULSTER 36 40 117 174 218 111 52 27 15 6 2 0 798 WALLKILL 1 1 40 132 154 104 58 28 23 2 5 2 550 WOODBOURNE 0 2 100 206 206 157 109 45 41 10 9 10 895 TOTAL 40 65 470 1057 1195 814 521 243 134 53 33 22 4647 .9Y. 1.4Y. 10.1Y. 22.7% 25.7% 17.5Y. 11.2Y. 5.2Y. 2.9Y. 1.1Y. .7% .5Y. 100.0Y. SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 8 19 102 191 164 111 63 36 25 10 5 2 736 SING SING 12 19 266 541 550 405 230 117 67 32 19 6 2264 TACONIC 2 14 59 110 100 60 30 13 8 4 1 0 401 TOTAL 22 52 427 842 814 576 323 1&0 100 40 25 8 3401 .6Y. 1.5Y. 12.6" 24.8" 23.9" 16.9" 9.5" 4.9" 2.9" .7% 100.0Y. GREEN HAVEN HUB (0) 1.4" .2" CAHP BEACON FEH 1 3 17 59 83 32 12 6 5 1 0 0 219 DOWNSTATE 75 105 292 406 345 192 124 51 27 14 5 6 1642 FISHKILL 5 16 180 447 473 328 181 85 43 27 7 5 1797 GREEN HAVEN 2 6 113 403 512 389 261 165 105 53 44 14 2067 HID-ORANGE 0 2 78 181 169 113 66 37 13 r.: 6 6 673 OTISVILLE 0 2 72 169 152 120 56 30 8 16 0 3 628 TOTAL 83 134 752 1665 1734 1174 700 374 201 113 62 34 7026 1.2Y. 1.9" 10.7% 23.7Y. 24.7Y. 16.7% 10.0Y. 5.3Y. 2.9Y. 1.6Y. .9Y. 100.0Y. GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) .5" CAI1P I1CGREGOR 1 3 37 57 77 57 31 8 5 3 2 0 281 COXSACKIE 146 383 313 79 25 7 3 1 1 0 1 0 959 GREAT HEADOW 13 80 290 402 332 211 96 72 23 12 1:2 1 1544 GREENE 264 572 195 180 129 107 37 22 18 8 5 1 1538 HUPsON 2 13 107 127 82 56 36 13 6 4 2 1 449 HUDSON WORK REL 0 0 16 16 25 20 12 4 2 1 0 0 96 HORIAH 'SHOCK 17 26 61 48 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 I1T I1CGrc~GOR 3 5 72 147 143 85 58 26 9 4 2 0 554 WASHINGTON 6 38 237 296 219 138 78 34 17 11 6 4 1084 TOTAL 452 1120 1328 1352 1034 681 351 180 81 43 30 7 6659 6.8" 16.8" 19.9" 20.3" 15.5% 10.2Y. 5.3" 2.7" 1.2% .6Y. .5Y. .1Y. 100.0Y. ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FENALE 9 25 143 331 278 199 110 41 16 6 3 1 1162 ATTICA 2 21 268 541 495 318 203 111 69 27 10 21 2086 COLLINS 4 17 198 289 263 155 108 45 25 15 9 5 1133 GROVELAND 2 3 145 227 207 158 135 55 22 8 I) 5 976 GROVELAND FEI1 HED 3 6 51 98 63 47 22 6 2 2 0 0 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 2 7 20 44 27 10 5 3 0 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 44 74 143 i96 11 0 0 0 0 {I 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 23 33 71 50 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 12 19 19 19 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 2 6 107 221 221 135 55 20 16 3 1 1 788 ORLEANS 9 26 228 371 283 184 93 42 26 17 7 7 1293 WENDE 8 10 120 169 183 124 74 47 32 9 10 2 788 WYOHING 5 20 318 476 389 206 115 62 26 9 8 6 1640 TOTAL 125 267 1831 3032 2422 1538 920 433 234 97 57 48 11004 1.1Y. 2.4Y. 16.6Y. 27.6Y. 22.0Y. 14.0y' 8.4Y. 3.9Y. 2.1% .9% .5% .4% 100.0Y. AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 6 28 181 417 439 276 182 94 47 23 8 10 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 20 33 73 48 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 4 10 29 33 ~1 14 7 4 0 0 1 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 69 107 30 18 23 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 0 5 37 54 63 26 12 5 3 1 0 1 207 CAYUGA 118 308 149 75 69 37 21 8 7 1 0 1 794 ELHIRA 40 90 37(0 553 347 174 83 53 26 13 7 ( 3 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK IS 35 72 44 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 3 3 23 47 57 27 26 5 5 1 2 0 199 SOUTHPORT 11 73 197 178 111 57 31 9 14 5 0 0 686 TOTAL 286 692 1167 1467 1134 618 365 180 102 44 18 15 6088 4.7% 11.4Y. 19.2% 24.1% 18.6Y. 10.2Y. 6.0% 5.0% 1.7% .7% NEW VORK CITY HUB (10) .3Y. .2Y. 100.0% ARTHURKILL 12 17 104 242 224 136 81 31 23 9 I. 6 891 BAYVIEW 0 0 19 52 42 26 14 6 4 2 0 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 0 0 7 20 25 14 12 5 2 1 (j 1 87 EDGECOHBE 2 8 57 140 1114 85 31 18 7 5 1 0 458 FULTOH 4 9 S2 118 109 70 34 27 14 5 1 1 444 LINCOLN 5 13 49 105 111 51 33 18 8 2 2 1 398 PARKSIDE 0 1 10 30 34 16 7 it 0 1 0 0 103 QUEENSBORO 5 40 132 242 191 102 70 38 20 13 7 3 863 TOTAL 28 118 430 949 840 500 282 147 78 38 17 12 3409 .ay. 2.6Y. 12.6Y. 27.8% 24.6" 14.7Y. 8.3" 4.3% 2.3% 1.1Y. .S% .4Y. 10G.0" GRAND TOTAL -- 1113 2636 9179 15010 12897 8032 4552 2273 1191 545 298 181 57907 1.9% 4.6Y. 15.9Y. 25.9Y. 22.3% 13.9Y. 7.9Y. 3.9% 2.1% .9% .5% .3% 100.0Y. -9-

TABLE 28. CLUSTER AND FACILITV BV AGE ON JANUARV I, 1992; UNDERCUSTODV PDPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER NUHBER AVERAGE HE DIAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 28.8 28.0 HARCV 1441 31.0 30.0 HID-STATE 1380 32.0 31.0 HOHAWK 1207 31.9 31.0 ONIEDA 1083 31.7 30.0 SUMMIT SHOK HALE 77 22.6 23.0 SUMHIT SHOCK FEH 90 24.9 25.0 SUBTOTAL 5460 31.3 30.0 WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 30.4 -- 29.0 OGDENSBURG 799 30.6 29.0 WATERTOWN 816 30.9 30.0 SUllTOTAL 2404 30.7 29.0 CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 30.8 29.0 ALTONA 731 30.5 30.0 BARE HILL 1545 30.6 29.0 CAHP GABRIELS 302 29.5 29.0 CHATEAUGAV ASACT 129 29.0 28.0 CLnlTON 2787 32.2 31.0 FRANKLIN 1543 30.9 29.0 LVON HOUNTAIN 160 30.5 30.0 SUBTOTAL 7809 31.2 30.0 SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1141 34.1 33.0 SHAWANGUNK 541 34.7 33.0 SULLIVAN 722 33.9 33.0 ULSTER 798 30.6 30.0 WALLKILL 550 34.1 32.0 WOODBOURNE 895 34.5 33.0 SUBTOTAL 4647 33.6 32.0 SING SING HUB IS) BEDFORD HILLS 736 32.5 31.0 SING SING 2264 33.4 32.0 TACONIC 401 31.3 30.0 SUBTOTAL 3401 33.0 32.0 GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 219 31.8 31.0 DOWNSTATE 1642 30.1 29.0 FISHKILL 1797 33.3 32.0 GREEN HAVEN 2067 36.4 34.0 HID-ORANGE 673 33.2 32.0 OTISVILLE 628 33.1 32.11 SUBTOTAL 7026 33.4 32.0 GREAT MEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 281 32.8 32.0 COXSACKIE 959 21.2 20.0 GREAT HEADOW 1544 30.8 29.0 GREENE 1538 24.3 20.0 HUDSON 449 30.4 28.0 HUDSON WORK REL 96 33.2 32.0 HORIAH SHOCK 154 22.8 23.t' HT HCGREGOR 554 32.3 31.0 WASHINGTON 1084 30.6 29.0 SUBTOTAL 6659 27.9 26.0 ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1162 31.9 31.0 ATTICA 2086 33.4 31.0 COLLINS 1133 32.2 30.0 GROVELAND 976 33.5 32.0 GROVELAND FEH HED 300 30.5 29.0 GROVELAND FEH HIN 118 28.7 28.0 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 23.6 24.0 LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 22.6 22.0 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 23.4 22.0 LIVINGSTON 788 31.6 31.0 ORLEANS 1293 31.5 30.0 WENDE 788 33.3 32.0 WVOHING 1640 31.1 30.0 SUBTOTAL 11004 31.6 30.0 AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1711 33.3 32.0 BUTLER SHOCK 177 22.7 22.0 BUTLER ASACTC 123 28.6 27.0 CAHP GEORGETOWN 259 21.8 20.0 CAMP PHARSALIA 211'7 30.6 30.0 CAYUGA 794 23.5 20.0 ELMIRA 1765 29.5 28.0 MONTEREY SHOCK 167 22.6 23.0 ROCHESTER 199 32.6 32.0 SOUTHPORT 686 27.9 26.0 SUBTOTAL 6088 29.0 28.0 NEW YORK CITY IIDB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 32.5 31.0 BAYVIEW 165 32.3 31.0 BAYVIEW WORK REL 87 34.3 33.0 EDGECOMBE 458 31.8 30.0 FULTON 444 32.7 31.0 LINCOLN 398 31.7 31.0 PARKSIDE 103 31.7" 31.0 QUEENSBORO 863 31.7 30.0 SUBTOTAL 3409 32.1 31.0 GRAND TOTAL 57907 31.3 30.0 -10-

Race/Ethnic Distribution

Race/ethnic status of undercustody inmates is shown in Table 3. Half (50.1 %) of the inmates are black; about a third are Hispanic (32.0%) and about a sixth (16.2%) are white. Less than two percent belong to other ethnic groups or are unknown. Ethnic distributions within the clusters generally resemble the ethnic breakdown for the system as a whole. There is some variability in the percentage of persons of the White and Hispanic ethnic groups within cluster distributions (see Figure 3). The percent of whites ranges from 12.2% in cluster 5 to 20.5% in cluster 9. Among Hispanics, the range is from 26.7% (cluster 9) to 36.5% (cluster 10) but among Blacks the range is only between 47.7% and 52.9%.

Fi$~ure 3 Race / Ethnic Profile (Percent of Cluster Population)

100

80 p e r 60 c e n t 40

20

o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat ell Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster

_ White D Black k::::::;::::1 Hispanic

'. -11-

TABLE 3. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY ETHNIC STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER WHITE BLACK HISPANIC NATIVE ASIAN OTHER TOTAL AND FACILITY AHERICAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 19 84 77 1 0 1 182 HARCY 243 741 439 7 1 10 1441 HID-STATE 182 656 519 7 3 13 1380 HOHAWK 162 586 453 2 1 3 1207 ONIEDA 249 549 272 6 2 5 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HAI.E 13 41 22 0 0 1 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 10 41 38 0 1 0 90 TOTAL 878 2698 1820 23 8 33 5460 16.1Y. 49.4Y. 33.3% .4Y.' .1% .6Y. 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 113 399 266 3 3 '5 789 OGDEUSBURG 128 369 291 2 3 6 799 WATERTOWN 149 378 278 1 2 8 816 TOTAL 390 1146 835 6 8 19 2404 16.2Y. 47.7Y. 34.7Y. .2% .3% .8% 100.0Y. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 105 299 203 1 1 3 612 ALTONA 86 374 258 2 1 10 731 BARE HILL 180 778 565 3 5 14 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 57 150 93 1 0 1 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 12 80 36 0 0 1 129 CLINTON 601 1372 766 13 8 27 2787 FRANKLIN 211 805 516 3 0 8 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 28 81 50 0 0 1 160 TOTAL 1280 3939 2487 23 15 65 7809 16.4% 50.4% 31.8% .3Y. .2Y. .8Y. 100.0Y. SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 217 580 334 4 3 3 1141 SHAWANGUNK 93 282 161 2 0 3, 541 SULLIVAN 135 363 215 3 2 4 722 ULSTER 34 341 305 1 3 114 798 WALLKILL 79 285 183 0 2 1 550 WOODBOURNE 135 422 326 0 3 9 895 TOTAL 693 2273 1524 10 13 134 4647 14.9% 48.9% 32.8% .2% .3% 2.9% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 132 354 224 1 2 23 736 SING SING 252 1205 782 3 8 14 2264 TACONIC 32 213 154 1 0 1 401 TOTAL 416 1772 1160 5 10 38 3401 12.2% 52.1% 34.1Y. .1% .3Y. 1.1% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 24 119 76 0 0 0 219 DOW"STATE 205 803 506 0 5 43 1642 FISHKILl. 241 829 709 6 4 8 1797 GREEN HAVEN 326 1031 687 4 11 8 2067 HID-ORANGE 94 333 240 3 2 1 673 OTISVILLE 101 291 225 :? 4 5 628 TOTAL 991 3486 2443 15 26 65 7026 14.1% 49.6% 34.8% .2Y. .4% .9Y. 100.0% QREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 51 120 110 0 0 0 281 CO)(SACKIE 67 604 271 1 7 9 959 GREAT HEADOW 239 832 456 3 8 6 1544 GREENE 139 842 515 3 12 27 1538 HUDSON 95 231 120 1 0 2 449 HUDSON WORK REL 58 29 8 0 0 1 96 HORIAH SHOCK 24 84 46 0 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 104 240 203 0 2 5 554 WASHINGTON 141 542 387 3 4 7 1084 TOTAL 918 3524 2116 11 33 57 6659 13.8% 52.9Y. 31.8% .2Y. .5% .9Y. ATTICA HUB (8) 100.0% ALBION FEItALE 129 !:98 429 2 1 3 1162 ATTICA 416 1089 5,50 15 9 7 2086 COLLINS 244 535 332 8 4 10 1133 GROVELAND 261 468 232 6 0 9 ')76 GROVELAND FE" HED 26 169 104 0 0 1 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 17 55 46 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 72 202 189 2 0 3 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 24 84 70 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 9 46 16 0 1 2 74 LIVINGSTON 112 373 296 1 1 5 788 ORLEANS 257 618 403 3 2 10 1293 WENDE 226 377 141 4 4 36 788 WYOHING 322 828 457 9 4 20 1640 TOTAL 2115 5442 3265 50 26 106 11004 19.2% 49.5% 29.7Y. .5% .2% 1.0% AUBURN HUB (9) 100.0Y. AUBURN 385 847 454 8 6 11 17U BUTLER SHOCK 33 86 57 1 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 12 65 43 0 1 2 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 26 155 76 1 0 1 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 47 99 60 1 0 0 207 CAYUGA 100 438 232 2 7 15 794 ELHIRA 433 886 397 15 11 23 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 30 80 57 0 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 86 80 21 2 0 10 199 SOUTHPORT 99 351 229 1 1 5 686 TOTAL 1251 3087 1626 31 26 67 60ea 20.5Y. 50.7Y. 26.7Y. .5% .4% HEW YORK CITY HUB (l0) 1.1% 100.0Y. ARTHURKILL 99 474 302 1 1 14 891 BAYVIEW 16 88 61 0 0 0 165 BAYVIEW WORI( REL 10 37 38 0 0 2 87 EDGECOHBE 38 196 221 1 0 2 458 FULTON 42 185 213 :5 0 1 444 LINCOLN 35 199 157 2 2 3 398 I'ARKSIDE 13 37 53 0 0 0 103 QUEENSBORO 217 437 199 3 0 7 863 TOTAL 470 1653 1244 10 3 29 3409 13.8Y. 48.5% 36.5% .3% .1% .9% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 9402 29020 18520 184 168 613 57907 16.2% 50.1% 32.0% .3Y. .3% 1.1% 100.0% -12-

Region of Commitment

The majority of inmates are committed from New York City counties (69.6%). An additional 12.2% are committed from suburban New York, 10.6% from upstate counties with a population center containing 50,000 inhabitants or more, and 7.7% from the remaining upstate counties. There are differences across th0 clusters in the proportion of inmates from each region of the state. Clusters in the western part of the state have a somewhat higher concentration of inmates committed from upstate urban and upstate rural counties (see Figure 4). Correspondingly, clusters near the New York City area have a higher concentration of inmates from New York City or Suburban New York City counties. These differences are in part due to housing of work release inmates at facilities near the residence county of the inmate.

Figure 4 Percent Committed From New York City

p e r c e n t

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 e 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -13-

TABLE 4. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY REGION OF COHHITHENT; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NEW YORK SUBURBAN UPSTATE UPSTATE TOTAL AND FACILITY CITY NEWYORK URBAN RURAL ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 153 5 10 14 182 HARCY 984 181 167 109 1441 HID-STATE 950 164 149 116 1379 HOHAWK 864 161 90 92 1207 ONIEDA 646 156 148 132 1082 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 45 13 8 11 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 66 8 11 5 90 TOTAL 3708 688 583 479 5458 67.9Y. 12.6Y. 10.7% 8.8Y. 100.0Y. WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 607 83 52 46 788 OGDENSBURG 607 104 45 43 799 WATERTOWN 549 83 101 83 816 TOTAL 1763 270 198 172 2403 73.4Y. 11.2Y. 8.2Y. 7.2Y. 100.0Y. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 439 96 32 45 612 ALTONA 486 132 69 44 731 BARE HILL 1154 225 83 82 1544 CAHP GABRIELS 201 39 28 34 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 75 52 1 1 129 CLINTON 1945 345 257 234 2781 FRAMKlIN 1127 245 77 92 1541 LYON HOUNTAIN 97 35 12 15 159 TOTAL 5524 1169 559 547 7799 70.8Y. 15.0Y. 7.2Y. 7.0Y. 100.0Y. SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 831 190 59 61 1141 SHAWANGUNK 404 76 28 32 540 SULLIVAN 546 93 33 50 722 ULSTER 785 4 1 2 792 WALLKILL 428 84 19 19 550 WOODBOURNE 690 119 48 38 895 TOTAL 3684 566 188 202 4640 79.4Y. 12.2Y. 4.1Y. 4.4Y. 100.0Y. SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 494 87 103 48 732 SING SING 1801 268 96 98 2263 TACONIC 304 68 13 15 400 TOTAL 2599 423 212 161 3395 76.6Y. 12.5Y. 6.2Y. 4.7% 100.0Y. GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 169 28 12 10 219 DOWNSTATE 1175 274 77 82 1608 FISHKILL 1385 207 51 154 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1618 269 87 92 2066 HID-ORANGE 520 106 12 34 672 OTISVILLE 492 85 11 40 628 TOTAL 5359 969 250 412 6990 76.7% 13.9Y. 3.6Y. 5.9Y. 100.0Y. GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP tlCGREGOR 199 45 17 20 281 CO)(SACKIE 741 82 84 51 958 GREAT HEADOW 1165 175 128 75 1543 GREENE 1151 193 114 78 1536 HUDSON 287 74 49 39 449 HUDSON WORK REL 3 2 58 33 96 HORIAH SHOCK 88 16 19 31 154 HT HCGREGOR 385 73 4'll 47 554 WASHINGTON 804 142 77 60 lO83 TOTAL 4823 802 595 434 6654 72.5Y. 12.1Y. 8.9Y. 6.5Y. 100.0Y. ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 839 128 121 68 1156 ATTICA 1343 206 349 187 2085 COLLINS 623 94 281 134 1132 GROVELAND 461 65 288 161 975 G~OVELAND FEH HED 204 36 45 15 300 GROVELAND FE" HIN 77 18 16 7 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 296 48 n 58 466 LAKEVIEW RECEP 128 16 :J.3 21 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 58 4 5 7 74 LIVINGSTON 527 80 120 59 786 ORLEANS 732 73 310 176 1291 WENDE 362 51 268 85 766 WYOHING 921 112 392 215 1640 TOTAL 6571 931 2272 1193 10967 59.9Y. 8.5Y. 20.7% 10.9Y. 100.0Y. AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1037 203 304 162 1706 BUTLER SHOCK 90 30 33 24 177 BUTLER ASACTC 83 2 30 7 122 CAHP GEORGETOWN 197 19 25 18 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 147 15 13 32 207 CAYUGA 508 93 120 72 793 ELHIRA 830 132 480 315 1757 HONTEREY SHOCK 82 35 25 25 167 ROCHESTER 4 2 135 58 199 SOUTHPORT 528 58 44 54 684 TOTAL 3506 589 1209 767 6071 57.7Y. 9.7% 19.9Y. 12.6Y. 100.0Y. NEW YORK CIry HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 729 119 19 24 891 BAYVIEW 137 19 4 4 164 BAYVIEW WORK REL 61 13 4 8 86 EDGECottBE 408 39 7 4 458 FULTON 326 103 7 7 443 LINCOLN 377 13 6 2 398 PARKSIDE Sl 16 0 6 103 QUEENS80RO 536 311 7 9 863 TOTAL 2655 633 54 64 3406 78.0Y. 18.6Y. 1.6Y. 1.9Y. 100.0Y. GRAND TOTAL 40192 7040 6120 't431 57783 69.6Y. 12.2Y. 10.6Y. 7.7% 100.0Y. -14-

Country of Birth

The large majority of inmates were born in the United States (76.5%) or one of its territories (10.5 %) (see Table 5). Approximately 12.4 % of undercustody inmates were born in a foreign country. Among foreign born inmates, 63 % were born in one of the island nations in the Caribbean basin.

Foreign birth may have implications for programming decisions, due to differences in language (many inmates from the Caribbean or from South America or Central America are Spanish dominant) or culture. 8

Percent foreign born ranges from 8.4% in cluster 10 (New York City Work Release) to 16.4% in cluster 6 (Green Haven Hub) (see Figure 5).

Figure 5 Foreign Born Status (Percent Foreign Born) \ \ \

30 \ \

25

P 20 e r c 15 e n t 10

5

." o 1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster

SFor additional information on foreign born inmltes ICC "The Impact of Foreign-Born Inmates on the New York Slate Department of Correctional Services· (1992) and "The Mariel Cuban Problem" (1991), New York State Department of Correctional Services, Albany, New York 12206. t -- >. -15-

TABLE 5 CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY WORLD REGION OF BIRTH; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER UNITED U.S. NORTH CARIB CENTRL SOUTII EUROPE AFRICA NEAR ASIA SOUTH NOT TOTAL AND FACILITY STATES POSSESS AHERCA SEA AHERCA AHERCA EAST PACFIC KNOWN ONEIDA HB,CLUSTER 1 JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 144 27 0 9 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 HARCY 1150 142 2 95 10 13 14 4 0 3 0 8 1441 HID-STATE 961 192 3 143 28 24 10 2 5 5 1 6 1380 HOHAWK 910 198 2 65 11 11 5 1 1 0 0 3 1207 ONIEDA 880 100 1 62 6 16 6 3 1 2 0 6 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 63 2 0 7 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 72 13 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 90 TOTAL (,180 674 8 382 56 70 38 10 7 11 1 23 5460 76.6% 12.3% .1% 7.0% 1.0% 1.3% .]% .2% .1% .2% .0% .4% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 603 103 0 50 9 18 5 0 0 0 0 1 789 OGDENSBURG 577 102 1 69 7 26 12 1 0 2 0 2 799 WATERTOWN 589 87 1 88 9 24 8 1 0 3 1 4 815 TOTAL 1769 292 2. 207 25 68 25 2 0 5 1 7 2403 73.6% 12.2% .1% 8.6% 1.0% 2.8% 1.0% .1% .0% .2% .0% .3% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 471 64 2 47 6 12 3 2 2 0 0 3 612 ALTONA 553 77 3 63 3 22 2 2 1 2 1 2 731 BARE HILL 1117 163 0 180 19 38 12 3 1 8 1 3 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 266 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASAtT 107 16 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 129 CLINTON 2162 246 4 224 26 71 20 2 8 11 1 11 2786 FRANKLIN 1187 176 7 104 13 29 13 6 2 4 0 2 1543 LYON HOU~TAIN 137 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 160 TOTAL 6000 798 16 621 68 172 53 15 14 25 3 23 7808 76.8% 10.2% .2% 8.0% .9% 2.2% .7% .2% .2% .3% .0% .3% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 879 123 2 78 11 27 13 3 0 4 0 1 1141 SHAWANGUNK 422 45 0 52 9 10 3 0 0 0 0 0 541 SULLIVAN 574 88 0 36 4 8 9 1 2 0 0 0 722 ULSTER 551 115 1 78 9 21 6 1 1 5 0 10 798 WALLKIll 401 72 0 50 5 13 4 3 0 1 0 1 550 WOOOBOURNE 598 95 2 124 9 41 12 3 0 6 2 3 895 TOTAL 3425 538 5 418 47 120 47 11 3 16 2 15 4647 73.7% 11.6% .1% 'i.0% 1.0% 2.6% 1.0% .2% .1% .3% .0% .3% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 548 52 2 50 6 39 7 3 1 2 3 23 736 SING SING 1624 270 1 235 20 ' 65 19 4 6 16 0 4 2264 TACONIC 311 37 1 29 1 14 5 0 0 0 1 2 401 TOTAL 2483 3S9 4 314 27 118 31 7 7 18 4 a9 3401 73.0% 10.6% .1% 9.2% .8% 3.5% .9% .2% .2% .5% .1% .9% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 187 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 218 DOWNSTATE 1247 138 0 133 17 31 18 7 1 9 0 41 1642 FISHKILL 1221 215 2 240 17 70 15 It 6 5 0 2 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1403 269 7 236 18 72 36 2 8 13 0 2 2066 HIO-ORANGE 482 92 0 71 5 11 6 1 0 4 0 1 673 OTISVILLE 460 74 0 58 2 16 8 2 1 3 0 4 628 TOTAL 5000 018 9 n8 59 20e 83 16 16 34 0 51 7024 71.2% 11.6% .1% 10.5% .8% 2.8% 1.2% .2% .2% .5% .0% .7% 1 GIl • OY. GREAT MEADOW HB (7) CAMP HCGREGOR 217 62 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 281 COXSACKIE 811 44 3 64 5 14 2 2 0 8 1 5 959 GREAT HEADOW 1204 137 2 123 12 36 14 0 2 11 1 2 1544 GREENE 1183 113 4 153 14 34 5 1 0 26 0 5 1538 HUDSON 397 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 449 HUDSON IlORK REL 88 5 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 96 HORIAH SHOCK 132 7 0 13 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 403 69 1 56 7 10 6 1 0 1 0 0 554 WASHINGTON 795 127 5 93 11 27 7 2 :5 9 0 5 1084 TOTAL 5230 616 15 503 50 122 37 ;, 5 •'. 55 2 18 6659 78.5% 9.3Y. .2% 7.6% .8Y. 1.8Y. .6Y. ATTICA HUB (81 .1Y. .1% .8% .OY. .3% 100.0Y. ALBION FEHALE 907 124 1 70 9 44 3 2 1 1 0 0 1162 ATTICA 1656 173 5 144 15 50 26 3 2 7 0 4 2085 COLLINS 870 99 0 105 8 33 8 2 3 3 0 1 1132 GROVELAND 800 85 4 52 7 16 5 2 0 0 0 5 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 236 32 0 17 2 10 0 0 1 0 0 2 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 105 12 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 346 45 3 47 1 19 5 0 0 0 0 2 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 137 20 0 16 1 ~, 0 1 0 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 67 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 575 151 1 58 8 6 4 2 0 0 0 3 788 ORLEANS 992 117 5 120 10 20 10 5 2 1 1 10 1293 WENDE 639 48 6 43 4 6 4 0 0 6 0 31 787 WYOMING 1278 148 5 132 16 30 7 0 0 6 0 18 1640 TOTAL 8608 1036 30 808 81 237 73 17 9 25 1 76 110n 78.2Y. 9.4Y. .3Y. 7.3Y. .7% 2.2Y. .7% AUBURN HUB (9) .2Y. .1Y. .2% .OY. .7% 100.0% AUBURN 1378 137 2 124 17 22 BUTLER 7 2 4 7 0 11 1711 SHOCK 150 12 0 10 1 4 0 0 0 0 c 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 101 15 0 4 1 C 0 CAHP GEORGETOWN 0 0 1 0 1 123 244 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 178 29 0 0 0 0 0 CAYUGA 0 Il 0 0 0 207 652 44 4 51 4 13 3 3 0 15 0 5 794 ELHIRA 1452 126 12 113 10 19 6 2 1 13 0 11 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 139 7 1 14 1 5 0 ROCHESTER 0 0 0 0 0 167 173 18 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 I) 7 199 SOUTHPORT 548 56 0 59 7 6 8 1 0 1 0 0 686 TOTAL 5015 458 19 375 41 69 26 8 5 37 0 35 6088 ,82.4% 7.5Y. .3Y. 6.2Y. .7% 1.1¥. HEW YORI( CITY (10) .4Y. .1Y. .1Y. .6% .OY. .6Y. 100.0% ARTHURKILL 657 101 1 81 15 16 10 0 1 6 0 3 891 BAYVIEW 144 19 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 61 23 0 1 0 1 0 EDGECOHBE 0 0 0 0 1 87 331 100 0 16 4 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 458 FULTON 310 107 0 19 1 1 3 LINCOLN 1 0 0 0 2 444 277 82 0 22 3 . 4 5 0 1 2 0 2 398 PARKSIDE 86 12 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 103 QUEENSBORO 7:58 6~ 2 29 3 16 9 1 1 0 0 1 863 TOTAL 2604 507 3 172 26 40 29 3 3 10 1 11 3409 76.4Y. 14.9l: .1% 5.0% .8Y. 1,2Y. .9% .1Y. .1Y. .3Y. .0% .3Y. 100.0Y. GRAND TOTAL- 44314 6096 111 4538 480 1216 442 95 69 236 15 288 57900 76.5% 10.5Y. .2Y. 7.8% .8l: 2.1¥. .8% .2Y. .1% .4Y. .OY. .5Y. 100.0% -16-

Marital Status Only a fifth of undercustody inmates were legally married at time of commitment. Another 10.4 % were living in a common law arrangement at the time of their commitment. The majority are single, never married (59.9%) (see Figure 6); the balance were separated/divorced (8.8%); or widowed (0.9%) (see Table 6).

The within cluster distribuHon of single, never married inmates ranges from 52.2% in cluster 4 (Sullivan Hub) to 68.8% in cluster 7 (Great Meadow Hub).

Figure 6 Marital Status (Percent Never Married)

100

p e 60 r c e n 40 t

20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat 011 Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYO Pop Cluster

'. -17-

TABLE 6. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HARITAL STATUS; U~DERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NEVER HARRIED COHtlON SEPARATE/ WIDOWED TOTAL AND FACILITY MARRIED LAW DIVORCE ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 118 31 19 14 0 182 HARCY 865 273 152 137 8 1435 HIO-STATE 807 276 149 130 10 1372 HOHAWK 705 208 136 139 9 1197 ONIEDA 644 219 88 126 4 1081 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 61 9 5 2 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 69 14 2 5 0 90 TOTAL 3269 1030 551 553 31 5434 60.2% 19.0% 10.1% 10.2% .6% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 511 128 7.4 73 1 787 OGDENSBURG 498 126 82 83 6 795 WATERTOWN 477 172 69 91 2 811 TOTAL 1486 426 225 241 9 2393 62.1% 17.8% 9.4% 10.3% .4% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 382 105 65 50 6 608 ALTONA 422 135 97 72 4 730 BARE" HILL 915 280 210 131 8 154(. CAHP GABRIELS 192 50 26 32 1 301 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 91 19 9 10 0 129 CLINTON 1565 613 301 264 30 2773 FRANKLIN 951 251 183 152 4 1541 LYON HOUNTAIN 98 26 20 14 a 158 TOTAL 4616 1479 911 725 53 7784 59.3% 19.0% 11.7Y. 9.3% .7Y. 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 564 293 165 106 10 1138 SHAWANGUNK 248 149 91 42 8 538 SULLIVAN 424 133 90 67 5 719 ULSTER 481 126 71 88 4 770 WALLKILL 245 168 86 47 3 549 ~OODBOURNE 445 237 117 87 9 895 TOTAL 2407 1106 620 437 39 4609 52.2;': 24.0% 13.5;': 9.5% .8;': 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 443 144 14 81 33 715 SING SING 1233 470 336 189 30 2258 TACONIC 262 82 5 39 11 399 TOTAL 1938 696 355 309 74 3372 57.5;': 20.6% 10.5;': 9.2;': 2.2;': 100.0;': GHEEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 154 33 2 22 8 219 DOWNSTATE 97& 318 182 115 12 1&03 FISHKILL 909 4&& 254 153 14 1796 GREEN HAVEN 907 597 341 174 42 20&1 HID-ORANGE 363 144 103 59 3 &72 OTISVILLE 34& 123 93 55 6 623 TOTAL 3&55 1&81 975 578 85 &974 52.4;': 24.1;': 14.0% 8.3;': 1.2;': 100.0;': GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 1&2 40 31 45 2 280 CO)(SACKIE 849 51 44 9 1 954 GREAT HEADOW 952 320 165 90 11 1538 GREENE 1204 159 109 55 4 1531 HUDSON 2&7 93 54 32 2 448 HUDSON WORK REL 48 29 6 13 a 96 HORIAH SHOCK 124 15 7 7 0 153 HT HCGREGOR 301 117 &7 65 4 554 WASHINGTON 657 205 123 92 5 1082 TOTAL 4564 1029 606 408 29 &636 68.8;': 15.5;': 9.1;': 6.1;': .4;': 100.0r. ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 759 223 14 118 40 1154 ATTICA 1132 502 221 189 33 2077 COLLINS 622 289 96 109 13 1129 GROVELAND 525 210 89 134 11 969 GROVELAND FEM HED 209 49 4 27 8 297 GROVELAND FEH HIN 87 16 1 7 6 117 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 367 53 34 12 a 466 LAKEVIEW RECE,. 142 23 8 2 a 175 LAKEVIEW ASAT 58 9 4 2 0 73 LIVINGSTON 473 131 81 96 4 785 ORLEANS 733 288 105 151 8 1285 WENDE 433 169 63 78 12 755 WYOMING 1054 262 122 174 8 1620 TOTAL 6594 2224 842 10'19 143 10902 60.5;': 20.4;': 7.7Y. 10.1;': 1.3% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 947 376 208 151 20 1702 BUTLER SHOCK 147 21 8 1 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 83 24 10 4 1 122 CAHP GEORGETOWN 223 1& 9 10 a 258 CAMP PHARSALIA 130 38 17 20 1 206 CAYUGA 653 74 32 25 5 789 ELHIRA 1,120 371 103 146 11 1751 HONTEREY SHOCK ·142 14 10 1 0 167 ROCHESTER \106 53 9 24 0 192 SOUTHPORT 487 98 61 38 a 684 TOTAL 4038 1085 467 420 38 6048 66.8;': 17.9;': 7.7Y. 6.9;': .6;': 100.0% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 529 182 108 58 9 886 BAYVIEW 109 25 0 28 2 164 BAYVIEW WORK REL 56 12 4 12 1 85 EDGECOHBE 23& 93 86 41 1 457 fULTON 231 101 75 34 2 443 LINCOLN 224 98 51 20 3 396 ,.ARKSIDE 67 20 2 11 1 101 QUEENSBORO 463 218 95 7& 9 863 TOTAL 19l5 749 421 282 28 3395 56.4% 22.1% 12.4% 8.3;': .8% lOO.O% GRAND TOTAL 34482 11505 5973 5058 529 57547 59.9% 20.07- 10.4% 8.8;': .9Y. 100.0;': -18-

Number of Living Children

The majority of inmates have at least one living child (see Table 7 and Figure 7). Only 36.0% report having no children. About one person in eleven (8.9%) report four or more living children. The percentage of inmates willi 1lQ children varies considerably from 29.1 % in cluster 6 (Green Haven Hub) to 48.1 % in cluster 7 (Great Meadow Hub). Clusters with the smallest proportion of inmates reporting at least one child generally also are the same as those with the highest number of 16-18 year old offenders (or the lowest average age of persons undercustody) .

Figure 7 Children: One or More Living Children

100

1.1------.---._-_.. _...... _ ...... _-_ ..... 80

p e 60 r c e n t 40

20

o 1 2 3 " 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -19-

TABLE 7. CLUSTEM AND FACILITV BV LIVING CHILDREN; UNDERCUS10DV POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NO 1 CHILD 2 3 4 OR HORE UNKNOWN TOTAL AND FACILITV CHILDREN CHILDREN CHILDREN ONEIDA HUB !CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 70 50 34 12 15 1 182 HARCV 534 353 260 124 129 41 1441 HID-STATE 466 338 254 125 148 49 1380 HOHAWK 380 305 225 125 148 24 1207 ONlEDA 384 265 178 110 115 31 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 47 18 8 1 3 0 77 SUHMIT SHOCK FEH 25 29 17 12 7 0 90 TOTAL 1906 1358 976 509 565 146 5460 34.9% 24.9% 17.9X 9.3% 10.3X 2.7% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 284 195 146 64 78 22 789 OGDENSBURG 308 207 135 63 74 12 799 WATERTOWN 282 221 144 -' 73 77 19 816 TOTAL 874 623 425 200 229 53 2404 36.4X 25.9% 17.7% 8.3% 9.5% 2.2% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 231 143 109 55 59 15 612 ALTONA 246 179 125 74 79 28 731 BARE HILL 533 449 256 124 149 34 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 112 84 50 28 26 2 302 CHATEAUGAV ASACT 52 31 21 14 11 0 129 CLINTON 1079 608 387 180 231 302 2787 FRA;~KLIN 588 374 289 128 133 31 1543 LVON HOUNTAIN 56 37 32 16 17 2 160 TOTAL 2897 1905 1269 619 705 414 7809 37.1% 24.4% 16.3% 7.9% 9.0% 5.3% 100.0% SULLIVAN HU8 (4) EASTERN 323 219 158 86 84 271 1141 SHAWANGUNK 128 101 67 30 48 167 541 SULLIVAN 250 124 101 54 38 155 722 ULSTER 215 164 132 66 63 158 798 WALLKILL 141 140 94 52 45 78 550 WOODBOURNE 305 173 120 75 104 118 8'75 TOTAL 1362 921 672 363 382 947 4647 29.3% 19.8% 14.5% 7.8% 8.2% 20.4% 100.0% SING StNG HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 179 185 155 96 97 24 736 SING SING 712 445 359 190 201 357 2264 TACONIC 100 89 92 58 56 6 401 TOTAL 991 719 606 344 354 387 3401 29.1% 21.1% 17.8% 10.1% 10.4% 11.4% 100.0X GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON fEH 49 48 48 43 31 0 219 DOWNSTATE 588 368 275 153 165 93 1642 FISHKILL 575 406 303 162 181 170 1797 GREEN !MVEN 524 381 274 181 211 496 2067 HID-ORANGE 209 161 121 68 54 60 673 OTISVILLE 232 125 94 56 58 63 628 TOTAL 2177 1489 1115 663 700 882 7026 31.0% 21&_ 15.9:1. 9.4X 10.0% 12.6X 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 100 68 44 45 21 3 281 COXSACKIE 629 233 51 15 11 20 959 GREAT HEADOW (,51 346 175 99 91 182 1544 GREENE 883 348 146 53 62 46 1538 HUDSON 173 114 70 40 28 24 449 HUDSON WORK REL 31 20 21 14 6 4 96 HORUH SHOCK 80 40 20 7 7 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 204 128 91 68 50 13 554 WASHINGTON 451 250 159 99 79 46 1084 TOTAL 3202 1547 777 440 355 338 6659 48.1X 23.2% 11.7% 6.6X 5.3% 5.1% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 265 262 265 172 186 12 1162 ATTICA 736 433 302 146 154 315 2086 COLLINS 381 269 191 104 115 73 1133 GROVELAND :ns 213 174 89 122 63 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 74 80 60 41 40 5 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 27 27 33 14 16 1 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 227 141 58 24 16 2 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 100 39 25 7 6 1 178 LAKEVIEW ASA'f 38 20 13 1 2 0 74 LIVINGSTON 255 187 148 91 96 11 788 ORLEANS 412 324 241 • 136 141 39 1293 WENDE 257 143 104 50 70 164 788 WYOHING 582 404 295 146 157 lie 1640 TOTAL 3669 2542 190~ 1021 1121 742 11004 33.3% 23.1% 17.3% 9.3X 10.2% AUBURN HUB (9) 6.7:1. 100.0X AUBURN 556 313 210 102 136 394 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 100 43 21 7 6 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 50 35 19 12 6 1 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 168 52 25 9 4 1 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 66 50 47 27 17 (I 207 CAYUGA 465 177 78 28 21 2S 794 ELHIRA 719 396 259 124 133 13(. 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 90 45 22 10 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 61 46 38 24 19 11 199 SOUTHPORT ::143 131 80 29 26 77 686 TOTAL 2618 1288 799 372 368 643 6088 43.QX 21.2% 13.1% 6.1X 6.0X NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 1O.6Y. 100.0% ARTHURKILL 343 183 142 77 84 62 891 BAYVIEW 41 34 45 24 20 1 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 19 18 22 14 14 0 87 EDGECOHIIE 156 105 98 42 45 12 458 FULTON 126 101 99 57 54 7 444 LINCOLN 130 103 65 3e 46 16 398 PARKSIDE 24 31 28 7 11 2 103 QUEEHSBORO 316 213 159 77 77 21 863 TOTAL 1155 788 658 336 351 121 3409 33.9% 23.1% 19.3% 9.9% 10.3% 3.5% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 20851 13180 9206 4867 5130 4673 57907 36.0% 22.8X 15.9% 8.4Y. 8.9% 8.1Y. 100.0% "

-20-

Religious Affiliation

Eighty-nine percent of undercustody inmates claim affiliation with a recognized religion. About 70% belong to a Christian faith. Sixteen percent (16.5%) afflliate with an Islamic faith and the balance (2.6%) with other religions (see Table 8).

The representation of each religious category within clusters approximates that for the overall population (see Figure 8). 9

Figure 8 Religious Affiliation (Percent of Cluster Population)

100

80

P e 60 r c e n t 40

20

o 1 2 3 " 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster

9For additional infonnation on religious affiliation of under custody irunates (e.g. age, sex, ethnic status by religious affiliation) see "Religious Affiliation of Und.:rcustody Population", (1991), Division of Program Planning, Research and Evaluation, New York State Departmcnt of Correctional SCrVices. I -21-

TABLE 8. CLUSTER AHD FACILITY BY RELIGIOUS AFFILIATION; U~DERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER CATHOLIC PROTSTNT ISLAM JEWISH RASTAFAR BUDHIST GREEK OTHER UNNAHED NOT TOTAL ~ND FACILITY IHIN1JU ORTHDOX CODED ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 80 46 40 0 0 0 0 0 15 1 182 HARCY 587 440 243 15 7 3 3 4 120 19 1441 HID-STATE 575 448 208 17 9 2 2 3 105 11 1380 ,110IlAWK 512 389 180 14 011 0 0 1 94 9 1207 UNIEDA 412 361 173 19 8 1 0 3 94 12 1083 SUMMIT SHOK HALE 30 23 6 0 0 0 0 0 17 1 77 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 46 27 8 3 0 0 0 0 6 0 90 TOTAL 2242 1734 858 68 32 6 5 11 451 53 5460 41.17- 31.87- 15.77. 1.27- .67- .17- .1% .27- 8.37- 1.07- 100.07- WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 330 231 134 7 8 1 2 I 2 63 11 789 OGDENSBURG 339 242 114 9 10 ~ 1 0 1 71 12 799 WATERTOWN 341 259 124 6 11 1 5 2 62 5 816 TOTAL 1010 732 372 22 29 3 7 5 196 28 2404 42.07- 30.47- 15.5% .97- 1.27- ,:\.% .37- .2% 8.27- 1.27- 100.07- CLINTON HUll (3) ADIRONDACK 253 172 119 8 5 0 0 0 51 4 612 ALTONA 314 207 119 9 6 1 1 1 66 7 731 BARE HILL 639 408 300 15 14 5 2 1 140 21 1545 CAMP GABRIELS 118 102 49 2 3 0 1 0 23 4 302 CHATEAUGAY AS ACT 47 43 24 0 1 0 0 1 12 1 129 CLINTON 1014 750 561 50 32 12 6 6 305 51 2787 FRANKLIN 636 431 295 17 10 1 1 1 138 13 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 70 49 25 1 1 0 0 1 13 0 160 TOTAL 3091 2162 1492 102 72 19 11 11 748 101 7809 39.67- 27.7% 19.1% 1.~% .97- .27- .17- .17- 9.67- 1.3% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 449 325 203 ~4 1 8 11 5 114 9 1141 SHAWANGUNK 221 129 98 5 2 2 0 1 77 6 S41 SULLIVAN 277 203 120 15 5 1 3 1 87 10 722 ULSTER 274 164 142 6 5 4 1 2 42 158 798 WALLKILL 222 158 99 4 4 3 1 0 54 5 550 WOODBOURNE 377 257 133 14 7 1 1 3 87 15 895 TOTAL 1820 1236 795 68 24 19 ') 12 461 203 4647 39.27- 26.67- 17.1% 1.57- .5% .4% .2% .3:~ 9.9% 4.4% 100.07- SING SING HUB (5) I BEDFORD HILLS 290 293 54 8 2 2 1 2 37 47 736 SING SING 859 640 443 40 16 8 3 5 218 32 2264 TACONIC 181 157 34 8 1 0 0 1 14 5 401 TOTAL 1330 1090 531 56 19 10 4 8 269 84 3401 39.17- 32.07- 15.6% 1.67- .6% .3% .1% .27- 7.9Y. 2.5% 100.07- GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEM 88 98 20 4 0 0 0 0 4 5 219 DOWNSTATE 60S 445 329 28 12 3 2 5 156 S7 1642 FISHKILL 810 488 271 20 11 7 1 1 164 24 1797 GREEN HAVEN 840 568 353 68 16 7 1 0 186 28 2067 HID-ORANGE 304 173 112 10 7 1 1 3 55 7 673 OTISVILLE 273 186 89 12 3 2 0 1 57 5 628 TOTAL 2920 1958 1174 142 49 . 20 5 10 622 126 7026 41.67- 27.97- 16.7Y. 2,.0Y. .77. .37- .17- .17- 8.97- 1.87- 100.07- GREAT HEAUOW HUB (7) CAMP HCGREGOR 145 82 33 3 1 0 r 0 16 1 281 CO)(SACKIE 287 266 245 4 8 7 0 5 120 17 959 GREAT HEADOW 564 354 338 17 20 5 1 3 185 27 1544 GREENE 561 445 273 7 7 8 1 6 211 19 1538 HUDSON 177 147 79 3 1 0 0 4 35 3 449 HUDSON \lORK REL 4S 39 1 1 0 0 1 0 8 1 96 HORIAH SHOCK 62 52 24 1 1 0 0 0 13 1 154 MT HCGREGOR 253 152 84 6 6 2 0 0 45 6 554 WASHINGTON 436 305 188 16 8 1 1 1 113 15 1084 TOTAL 2530 1872 1265 58 52 23 4 19 746 90 6659 38.0Y. 28.1% 19.0l'. .9l'. .87- .3l'. .17- .37- 11.2l'. 1.4% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 504 482 87 20 1 2 1 0 42 23 1162 ATTICA 743 658 357 43 17 9 0 6 230 23 2086 COLLINS 446 410 153 13 3 4 1 7 82 14 1133 GROVELAND 363 386 116 15 6 0 0 :5 73 14 976 GROVELAND FEM HED 115 122 31 4 1 0 0 1 20 6 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 54 50 6 3 0 0 I} 0 5 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 195 145 65 3 2 1 1 0 49 7 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 78 40 29 1 2 0 1 3 23 1 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 24 32 13 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 74 LIVINGSTON 338 247 123 6 4 2 0 1 57 10 788 ORLEANS 517 446 191 10 12 2 1 1 103 10 1293 WENDE 272 26!> 124 4 5 5 0 1 84 28 788 WYOSING 609 560 261 15 15 3 1 4 154 18 1640 TOTAL 4258 3843 1556 137 68 28 6 27 926 155 11004 38.7% 34.9l'. 14.1l'. 1.27- .6l'. .37- .1l'. .2% 8.47- 1.4l'. 100.0% AUBURN HUB (91 AUBURN 627 506 282 20 9 2 2 8 228 27 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 74 57 23 1 1 0 0 1 19 1 177 BUTLER ASACTC 49 35 21 0 1 1 0 0 15 1 12:1 CAMP GEORGETOWN 91 74 45 1 0 0 0 1 46 1 259 CAMP PHARSALIA 81 70 36 2 0 0 0 0 17 1 207 CAYUGA 264 232 157 6 4 0 1 115 9 794 ELHIRA 566 600 299 19 13 5 2 5 212 44 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 68 60 16 2" 0 0 0 0 20 1 167 ROCHESTER 75 104 6 1 0 0 1 1 10 1 199 SOUTHPORT 249 169 155 10 3 0 1 3 91 5 686 TOTAL 2144 1907 1040 62 33 12 6 20 773 91 6088 35.27- 31.37- 17.1l'. 1.07- .5l'. .27- .17- .37- 12.7% 1.57- NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 100.07- ARTItURKILL 364 264 141 17 7 1 0 3 80 14 891 BAYVIEW 71 67 17 7 0 0 1 0 2 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 40 31 6 3 0 0 Ii 0 3 4 87 EDGECOHBE 231 121 72 4 2 0 0 0 25 3 458 FULTON 224 130 48 3 4 1 0 0 32 2 444 LINCOLN 185 119 56 7 3 2 0 0 25 1 398 PARKSIDE 57 30 7 1 0 0 G 0 '6 2 103 QUEENSBORO 352 282 138 2'1 1 1 6 3 46 !i 863 - - TOTAL 1524 1044 485 71 17 5 7 6 219 31 5409 44.7% 30.6Y. 14.2l'. 2.17- .57- .17- .2l'. .27- 6.~% .97- 100.07- GRAND TOTAl. 22869 17578 9568 786 395 145 64 129 rAil 962 57907 39.57- 30.47- 16.5l'. 1.47- .77- .37- .1i( .2l'. 9.37- 1.7% 100.0% -22-

Veteran's Status

Veterans undercustody are eligible for various benefits and as a result the Department tracks numbers of veterans in its custody.

A total of4,412 persons undercustody (7.7% of57,262) for whom the Department has information are veterans of the American armed forces. Over two thousand (2,017) are post Viet Nam era-veterans and 1,782 are Vietnam war era veterans; an additional 408 served prior to Vietnam and for 205 persons the era of service is unknown. Table 9 shows that as a percent of the total population of inmates in each cluster veterans are fairly evenly distributed across the 10 clusters (see also Figure 9). The low ranges. from 5.5% veterans at cluster 5 (Sing-Sing Hub) to a high of 8.6% veterans at cluster 8 (Attica Hub).

Figure 9 Veteran Status (Percent Veteran)

20

~------.-.----- .. -_ .. _.-•...... -·-··:..---··----··----1 15 p e r c 10 e n t

5

0~4=~r=~ P~SP~~~~~02~~~.-~~~~~ 1 234 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat ell Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster

, >. -23-

TABLE 9. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY VETERAN STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER NOT VETERAN VETERAN, PRE-VIETNAH VIETNAH POST-VIETNAH TOTAL AND FACILITY SERVICE ERA VETERAN VETERAN VETERAN UNKNOWN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 168 1 0 3 9 181 HARCY 1320 7 8 44 55 1434 HID-STATE 1265 4 12 42 49 1372 HOHAWK 1115 5 8 27 47 1202 ONIEDA 960 4 12 45 57 1078 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 75 0 0 0 1 76 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 88 0 0 0 1 89 TOTAL 4991 21 40 161 219 5432 91.9% .4% .7% 3.0% 4.0% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 739 3 .' 1 13 29 785 OGDENSBURG 734 3 3 18 36 794 WATERTOWN 741 3 5 18 43 810 TOTAL 2214 9 9 49 108 2389 92.7% .4% .4% 2.1% 4.5% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (31 ADIRONDACK 553 4 4 19 28 608 ALTONA 659 3 0 19 45 726 BARE HILL 1431 7 3 36 57 1534 CAHP GABRIELS 275 1 1 8 16 301 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 122 1 0 1 3 127 CLINTON 2508 13 26 114 104 2765 FRANKLIN 1418 3 6 41 67 1535 LYON HOUNTAIN 139 0 1 4 15 159 TOTAL 7105 32 41 242 335 7755 91.6% .4% .5% 3.1% 4.3% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1031 3 4 62 34 1134 SHAWANGUNK 498 2 3 23 12 538 SULLIVAN 665 2 9 26 17 719 ULSTER 589 1 1 21 28 640 WALLKILL 507 0 4 18 19 548 WOODBOURNE 811 6 15 38 20 890 TOTAL 4101 14 36 188 130 4469 91.8% .3% .&% 4.2% 2.9% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 699 0 0 0 7 706 SING SING 2071 13 17 65 80 2246 TACONIC 395 0 1 0 1 397 TOTAL 3165 13 18 65 88 3349 94.5% .4% .5% 1.9% 2.6% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEH 215 0 0 0 3 218 DOWNSTATE 1460 14 10 47 60 1591 FISHKILL 1651 7 16 70 45 1789 GREEN HAVEN 1845 13 38 91 68 2055 HID-ORANGE 626 4 (, 16 20 672 OTISVILLE 57.B 2 3 17 22 622 TOTAL 6375 40 73 241 218 6947 91.8% .6% 1.1% 3.5% 3.1% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB 17i CAHP MCGREGOR 246 1 4 19 11 281 COXSACKIE 942 0 1 1 8 952 GREAT HEADOW 1424 5 13 52 42 1536 GREENE 1474 4 4 20 23 1525 HUOSON 422 1 2 6 16 447 HUDSON WORK REL 76 2 0 7 10 95 HORIAH SHOCK 147 0 0 0 7 154 HT MCGREGOR 482 1 3 37 28 551 WASHINGTON 1009 0 7 30 33 1079 TOTAL 6222 14 34 172 178 6620 94.0% .2% .5% 2.6% 2.7% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (81 ALBION FEMALE 1142 2 0 1 5 1150 ATTICA 1871 9 24 92 84 2080 COLLINS 1022 5 9 39 S2 1127 GROVELAND 752 1 14 153 47 967 GROVELAND FEH HED 290 0 0 0 4 294 GROVELAND FEH HIN 116 0 0 0 1 117 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 448 0 0 0 15 463 LAKEVIEW RECEI' 175 0 0 0 3 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 68 0 0 0 4 72 LIVINGSTON 735 2 3 16 26 782 ORLEANS 1171 3 12 33 64 1283 WENDE 678 0 13 30 32 753 WYOHING 1483 2 21 45 67 1618 TOTAL 9951 24 96 409, 404 10884 91.4% .2% .9% 3.8% 3.7% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1564 3 18 55 54 1694 BUTLER SHOCK 170 0 0 0 7 177 BUTLER ASACTC 114 0 0 3 5 122 CAHP GEORGETOWN 252 0 0 3 3 258 CAHP PHARSALIA 184 1 3 5 12 205 CAYUGA 765 1 0 9 13 788 ELMIRA 1612 9 12 39 70 1742 HONTEREY SHOCK 160 0 0 0 7 167 ROCHESTER 154 2 5 12 18 191 SOUTHPORT 649 1 2 16 14 682 TOTAL 5624 17 40 142 203 6026 93.3% .31( .7% 2.4% 3.4% 100.01( NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 803 10 3 30 38 884 BAYVIEW 163 0 0 0 1 164 SA YVIEW WORK REL 84 1 0 0 0 85 EDGECOHBE 421 1 2 15 18 457 FULTON 398 2 2 20 22 444 LINCOLN 363 2 4 12 I f• 395 I'ARKSIDE 98 0 0 C 1 99 IIUEENS80RO 772 5 10 36 40 863 TOTAL 3102 21 21 113 134 3391 91.5% .6% .61( 3.3% 4.01( 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 52850 205 408 1782 2017 57262 92.3% .4% .7% 3.11( 3.51( 100.0% '.

-24-

Section Two

CRIMINAL HISTORY

Min1mum Sentence

The median minimUm sentence of undercustody inmates is 36.0 months. However, the average minimum sentence length is 70 months (nearly six years) reflecting the lengthy minimum sentences of many inmates in the maximum security facilities (see Table 10 and Table lOB).

There are differences between clusters in average and median minimum sentence length (see Figure 10), but these differences are partially driven by the number of maximum security facilities in each cluster. Inmates with long sentences -are more likely to be confmed in maximum security facilities. Appendix B shows average and median minimum sentence by security status. The median minimum sentence for persons in maximum security facilities is 84 months, for those at medium security it is 30 months, for inmates at minimum security the median minimum term tends to be approximately 24 months, work release 36 months, and minimum camps 18 months. Clusters where the ratio of maximum security inmates to all other medium and minimum security inmates is high will tend to have a higher proportion of inmates with lengthy minimum terms. Median minimum sentence length ranges from 24 months in cluster 2 (Watertown Hub) to a high of 72 months in clusters 4 (Sullivan Hub) and 5 (Sing-Sing Hub). Individual facility medians range from 18 months (Camp Gabriels C.F.) to 180 months (Shawangunk C.F.).

Figure 10 Median Minimum Sentence (In Montha)

100

80 -- .---72 72

M e 60 d i a n 40

20

0 t 2 3 ~ S 6 7 8 II 10 Total Onl Wat Cil SuI 5S OH OM Att Aub NYC Pop Clulilar -25-

TABLE 10. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HINIHUH SENTENCE; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER 12-17 18-23 24-35 36-47 48-71 72-119 120-179 180-239 240 + TOTAL AND FACILITY HONTHS HONTHS HONTHS HONTHS HONTHS HONTHS "ONTHS HONTHS HONTHS ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 4 11 120 28 15 4 0 0 0 182 HARCY 102 210 513 307 215 72 13 6 2 1440 HID-STATE 71 165 442 293 261 115 24 9 0 1380 MOHAWK 144 263 433 229 97 29 6 3 3 1207 ONIEDA 123 187 350 189 143 76 8 3 2 10B1 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 19 18 31 9 0 0 0 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOC~ FEH 10 20 42 17 1 0 0 0 0 90 TOTAL 473 874 1931 1072 732 296 51 21 7 5457 8.n 16.0% 35.4% 19.6% 13.4% 5.4% .9% .4% .1% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 71 169 251 152 102 31 7 5 1 789 OGDENSBURG 69 157 303 148 79. 38 4 1 0 799 WATERTOWN 84 124 287 155 113 47 5 1 0 816 TOTAL 224 450 841 455 294 116 16 7 1 2404 9.3% 18.17. 35.0% 18.9% 12.2% 4.8% .17. .3% .0% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 50 86 211 128 83 48 4 2 0 612 ALTONA 60 114 263 148 101 43 1 1 0 731 BARE HILL 99 170 466 294 385 109 15 6 1 1545 CAMP GABRIELS 94 92 108 5 2 1 0 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 2 7 75 31 12 2 0 0 0 129 CLINTON 65 125 410 255 399 628 265 190 442 2779 FRAHKLIH 129 241 498 316 244 97 13 3 2 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 25 20 47 64 3 1 0 0 0 16G TOTAL 524 855 2078 1241 1229 929 298 202 445 7801 6.17. 11.0% 2&.6% 15.9% 15.8% 11.9% 3.8% 2.6% 5.7% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 22 41 82 53 64 214 183 202 280 1141 SHAWANGUNK 2 5 11 13 24 98 75 96 215 539 SULLIVAN 41 72 111 42 55 112 63 75 148 719 ULSTER 95 208 318 108 &3 2 1 1 0 796 WALLKILL 12 37 76 63 121 168 31 27 15 550 WOODBOURNE 10 47 115 119 24& 251 53 34 19 894 TOTAL 182 410 713 398 573 845 406 435 677 4&39 3.9% 8.8% 15.4% 8.6% 12.4% 18.2% 8.8% 9.4% 14.6% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 74 68 147 63 84 116 22 87 74 735 SING SING 38 93 209 179 270 626 269 235 343 2262 TACONIC 39 65 152 74 57 12 2 0 0 401 TOTAL 151 226 508 316 411 754 293 322 417 3398 4.4% 6.7% 14.9% 9.3% 12.1% 22.2% 8.6% 9.5% 12.3% 100.0% GREEN HAVEH HUB (61 CAHP BEACON FEH 42 53 98 24 1 1 0 0 0 219 DOWNSTATE 171 226 392 191 205 258 63 31 70 1&07 FISHKILL 49 95 308 268 4&3 4&3 78 51 22 1797 GREEN HAVEN 9 24 69 72 129 440 308 361 655 20&7 HID-ORANGE 13 52 160 121 141 135 26 22 3 673 OTISVILLE 16 33 113 97 147 163 31 23 5 628 TOTAL 300 483 1140 773 1086 1460 506 488 755 6991 4.3% 6.9% 16.3% 11.1% 15.5% 20.9% 7.2% 7.0% 10.8% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR S6 44 163 12 3 2 1 0 0 281 CO)(SACKIE 67 74 151 96 186 2&6 41 38 40 959 GREAT HEADOW 23 78 206 158 210 371 144 102 250 1542 GREENE 213 179 417 246 307 145 17 11 3 1538 HUDSON 29 S6 11& 73 99 57 11 3 5 449 HUDSON WORK REL 13 5 24 21 16 15 0 1 1 96 HORIAH SHOCK 49 3S 44 25 1 0 0 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 21 43 290 74 79 35 8 4 0 554 WASHINGTON 45 116 272 186 269 162 22 7 4 1083 TOTAL 516 630 1683 891 1170 1053 244 166 303 665& 7.8% 9.5% 25.3% 13.4% 17.6% 15.8% 3.7% 2.5% 4.6% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 213 196 395 183 128 39 4 4 0 1162 ATTICA 35 103 236 172 242 475 202 195 425 2085 COLLINS 62 129 31ll 179 273 138 25 17 '1 1133 GROVELAND 72 138 274 171 166 116 20 14 5 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 45 50 100 47 38 17 0 3 0 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 30 24 45 17 2 0 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 127 114 160 67 0 a 0 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 58 33 60 26 1 0 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 38 18 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON :;S 47 382 191 88 39 4 1 1 788 ORLEANS 129 171 400 231 273. 73 8 7 1 1293 WENDE 10 23 65 60 77 152 94 98 187 76& WYOMlNG 141 281 572 313 250 69 10 4 0 1&40 TOTAL 995 1327 3004 1661 1538 1118 367 343 628 10981 9.1% 12.1% 27.4% 15.1% 14.0% 10.2% 3.3% 3.1% 5.7% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 42 75 164 118 156 327 211 189 422 1704 BUTLER SHOCK 56 32 53 36 0 0 0 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 1 14 64 24 15 S 0 0 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 105 75 72 3 4 0 0 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 39 68 82 13 3 2 0 0 0 207 CAYUGA 143 100 238 141 126 33 4 5 3 793 ELHIRA 96 130 273 167 230 437 135 107 181 1756 HONTEREY SHOCK 54 40 48 25 0 0 0 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 30 14 66 55 23 8 1 2 0 199 SOUTHPORT 31 54 115 83 104 117 52 40 90 686 TOTAL 597 602 1175 665 661 929 403 343 696 6071 ~.8% 9.9% 19.4% 11.0% 10.9% 15.3% 6.6% 5.6% NEW YORK CITY HUB (l0) 11.5% 100.0% ARTHURKILL 37 90 228 156 184 164 13 15 4 891 BAYVIEW 4 22 77 27 23 'J 0 3 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 7 8 39 21 10 1 0 1 0 87 EDGECOHBE 13 21l 213 105 56 41 3 6 1 458 FULTON 32 48 147 119 64 30 1 3 0 444 LINCOLN 21 40 113 97 81 35 4 7 0 398 PARKS IDE 3 9 34 35 18 4 0 0 0 103 QUEENSBORO 70 85 264 222 151 flO 1 10 0 863 TOTAL 187 322 1115 782 587 344 22 45 5 34D? ' - 5.5% 9.4% 32.7% 22.9% 17.2% 10.1% .6% 1.3% .1% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 4149 6179 14188 8254 8281 7844 2606 2372 3934 57807 7.2% 10.7% 24.5% 14.3% 14.3% 13.6% 4.5% 4.1% 6.8% 100.0% -26-

TABLE laB. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HINIHUH SENTENCE (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER NUHBER AVERAGE HEDIAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 31.1 30.0 HARCY 1441 35.2 30.0 HID-STATE 1380 39.5 36.0 HOHAWK 1207 30.1 24.0 ONIEDA 1083 34.2 24.0 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 77 21.8 24.0 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 90 24.7 24.0 SUBTOTAL 5460 34.5 30.0 WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 33.4 24.0 OGDENSBURG 799 31.6 24.0 WATERTOWN 816 33:-2 28.0 SUBTOTAL 2404 32.8 24.0 CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 35.8 30.0 ALTONA 731 33.7 30.0 BARE HILL 1545 39.2 36.0 CAHP GABRIELS 302 19.7 18.0 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 129 31.5 30.0 CLINTON 2767 118.2 72.0 FRANKLIN 1543 35.5 30.0 LYON HOUNTAIN 160 28.3 30.0 SUBTOTAL 7809 64.7 36.0 SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1141 154.1 144.0 SHAWANGUNK 541 239.8 180.0 SULLIVAN 722 125.8 84.0 ULSTER 798 26.5 24.0 WALLKILL 550 70.7 60.0 WOODBOURNE 895 69.6 60.0 SUBTOTAL 4647 111.6 72.0 SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 736 87.3 48.0 SING SING 2264 118.7 90.0 TACONIC 401 31.8 24.0 SUBTOTAL 3401 101.7 72.0 GREEN HAVEN IlUS (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 219 22.7 24.0 DOWNSTATE 1642 61.1 36.0 FISHKILL 1797 61.5 54.0 GREEN HAVEN 2067 178.3 152.0 HID-ORANGE 673 54.7 42.0 OTISVILLE 628 62.0 54.0 SUBTOTAL 7026 94.0 60.0 GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 281 23.2 24.0 COlCSACKIE 959 69.4 54.0 GREAT HEADOW 1544 120.6 72.0 GREENE 1538 38.5 50.0 HUDSON 449 46.1 36.0 HUDSON WORK REL 96 45.1 36.0 HORIAH SHOCK 154 21.5 18.0 HT HCGREGOR 554 36.2 24.0 WASHINGTON 1084 46.2 36.0 SUBTOTAL 6659 62.6 36.0 ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1162 29.8 24.0 ATTICA 2086 132.5 90.0 COLLINS 1133 46.5 36.0 GROVELAND 976 42.9 36.0 GROVELAND FEH HED 300 32.4 24.0 GROVELAND FEH HIN 118 22.9 24.0 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 21.9 19.0 LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 21.7 18.0 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 18.1 16.0 LIVINGSTON 788 34.6 30.0 ORLEANS 1293 36.7 30.0 WENDE 788 154.4 108.0 WYOHING 1640 33.4 28.0 SUBTOTAL 11004 62.0 36.0 AUBURN HUB ('II AUBURN 1711 149.4 100.0 BUTLER SHOCK 177 22.5 24.0 BUTLER ASACTC 123 33.1 30.0 CAHP GEORGETOWN 259 18.4 18.0 CAHP PHARSALIA 207 22.1 18.0 CAYUGA 794 33.7 24.0 ELHIRA 1765 94.2 60.0 HONTEREY SHOCK 167 20.9 18.0 ROCHESTER 199 34.0 30.0 SOUTHPORT 686 103.9 54.0 SUBTOTAL 6088 89.8 43.0 NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 48.0 36.0 BAYVIEW 165 36.2 30.0 BAYVIEW WORK REL 87 32.3 30.0 EDGECOHBE 458 39.4 30.0 FULTON 444 36.6 30.0 LINCOLN 398 41.1 36.0 PARKS IDE 103 35.5 36.0 QUEENSBORO 863 37.6 36.0 SUBTOTAL 3409 40.6 36.0 GRAND TOTAL 57807 69.9 36.0 -27-

Commitment Crime

Over a third (34.3%) of the inmates are undercustody for drug offen[.t.s; eleven percent (11.3%) are undercustody for robbery 1st degree (see Table 11). (By counting robbery all degrees as one category, one obtains a total of 20.5 % undercustody for robbery). A variety of other felonies including murder (7.8%) and other homicides (7.4%) constitute the balance.

Variation in the drug offender levels between clusters is considerable; the cluster percents range from 24.3% (cluster 9, Auburn Hub) to 51.5% (cluster 10, New York City work release facilities, see Table 11B). Similarly, the percent of inmates that are violent felony offenders ranges from 35.8% in cluster 2 (Watertown Hub) to 65.0% in cluster 4 (Sullivan Hub) (see Figure 11).

Figure 11 Percent Violent Felony

p e r c e n t

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster -28-

TABLE 11. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY CRIHE STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER HURDER ATT HANSLA RAPE ROB ROB ASAULT ASAULT BURG BURG ARSON SODOMY SEXUAL WEAPON KIDNAP AND FACILITY HURDER UGHT 1 1ST 1ST 2ND 1ST 2ND 1ST 2ND IST,2N 1ST ABUS 1 CRIHE 1ST 2N ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 0 1 0 0 17 32 0 0 1 10 0 0 0 11 0 HARCY 8 9 22 24 140 139 21 14 12 101 2 10 11 58 3 HID-STATE 10 17 32 47 125 123 25 24 10 96 7 25 24 66 3 HOHAWK 5 4 20 7 83 82 6 11 1 64 2 8 5 68 2 ONIEDA 7 6 20 41 96 91 14 18 8 98 1 19 24 50 3 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 0 0 0 0 0 0 (l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 30 37 94 119 461 467 66 67 32 369 12 62 64 253 11 .5% .7% 1.7% 2.2% 8.4% 8.6% 1.2% 1.2Y. • loY. 6.8Y. .2Y. 1.1Y. 1.2Y. 4.6Y. .2Y. WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 6 6 9 20 66 64 12 ~"- 6 2 48 1 4 3 42 2 OGDENSBURG 0 0 10 0 59 70 13 11 5 47 2 9 11 53 0 WATERTOWN 0 0 9 0 60 57 12 16 4 54 1 8 5 53 0 TOTAL 6 6 28 20 185 191 37 33 11 149 4 21 19 148 2 .2% .2% 1.2% .8% 7.7% 7.9% 1.5Y. 1.4Y. .5Y. 6.2Y. .2% .9% .8% 6.2% .1% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 1 4 12 18 53 51 11 4 3 38 1 7 11 18 1 ALTONA 2 7 17 17 61 65 5 13 4 50 1 4 8 30 1 BARE HILL 6 12 45 28 145 144 18 12 16 82 3 10 7 75 1 CAHP GABRIELS 0 0 0 0 11 18 0 4 0 14 0 0 '0 17 0 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 0 0 1 0 14 13 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 4 0 CLINTON 453 78 188 163 395 206 54 39 37 119 10 104 34 81 26 FRANKLIN 4 22 30 24 122 134 15 25 12 96 3 8 14 77 4 LYON HOUNTAIN 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 13 0 0 0 4 0 TOTAL 466 123 293 250 803 634 106 97 73 417 18 133 74 306 33 6.0% 1.6% 3.8% 3.2% 10.3% 8.1% 1.4% 1.2% .9% 5.3% .2% 1.7% .9% 3.9% .4% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 343 45 78 50 161 56 10 4 19 28 5 16 5 22 13 SHAWANGUNK 239 24 41 22 83 15 2 3 1" 8 2 6 0 8 4 SULLIVAN 170 21 46 32 92 36 6 5 9 33 3 14 4 8 3 ULSTER 1 7 9 4 68 86 6 10 3 25 1 2 1 40 2 WALLKILL 33 19 44 29 101 34 10 5 8 28 1 11 3 29 2 WOODBOURNE 44 27 66 60 131 81 16 13 16 39 8 41 13 23 3 TOTAL 830 143 284 197 636 308 58 40 69 161 20 90 26 130 27 17.9% 3.1% 6.1% 4.2% 13.7% 6.6% 1.2% .9% 1.5% 3.5% .4% 1.9% .6% 2.8% SING SING HUB (5) .6% BEDFORD HILLS 112 12 74 2 33 25 10 13 9 11 7 5 1 7 6 SING SING 397 91 209 118 394 116 35 27 41 77 3 31 10 47 23 TACONIC 0 2 15 0 17 20 2 4 2 10 1 1 1 3 3 TOTAL 509 105 298 120 444 161 47 44 52 98 11 37 12 57 32 15.0% 3.1% a.8% 3.5% 13.1% 4.7% 1.4% 1.3% 1.5% 2.9% .3% 1.1% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) .4% 1.7% .9% CAHP BEACON FEH 0 0 1 0 3 9 2 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0 DOWNSTATE 60 24 54 30 227 127 27 51 16 77 2 20 23 74 4 FISHKILL 62 56 151 93 2810 112 34 22 32 94 5 41 20 62 5 GREEN HAVEN 696 91 176 104 275 101 23 19 35 53 8 38 2 46 29 HID-ORANGE 20 14 44 15 88 48 10 7 12 43 2 4 3 26 0 OTISVILLE 21 20 50 26 108 48 11 6 19 33 2 6 5 28 9 TOTAL 859 205 456 268 987 405 107 85 114 304 19 109 53 237 47 12.3% 2.9% 6.5% 3.8% 14.1% 5.8X 1.5X 1.2Y. 1.6% 4.3% .3% 1.6% .a% 3.4% .7% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR " 0 0 1 0 10 13 0 1 3 21 0 0 0 8 0 COXSACKIE 69 42 141 41 198 97 28 13 13 38 2 5 2 40 3 GREAT HEADOW 259 55 122 67 281 135 35 21 24 67 7 25 10 45 11 GREENE 13 47 61 32 311 208 58 30 20 71 6 9 14 63 4 HUDSON 5 12 30 6 45 52 8 8 4 47 2 3 2 20 0 HUDSON WORK REL 0 1 4 0 5 4 3 2 4 10 0 0 0 2 0 HORIAH SHOCK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HT HCGREGOR 4 6 6 4 54 60 6 5 4 41 1 2 7 27 1 WASHINGTON 10 17 55 33 149 96 17 17 11 82 11 11 14 48 1 TOTAL 360 180 420 183 1053 665 155 97 83 377 29 55 49 253 20 5.4% 2.7% 6.3% 2.7% 15.8% 10.0% 2.3% 1.5% 1.2% 5.7% .4% .8% .7% 3.8% .3% ATTICA HUB (81 ALBION FEMALE 3 4 33 2 38 56 20 10 4 28 5 0 1 13 4 ATTICA 464 70 159 103 281 1310 310 39 39 110 12 46 13 55 16 COLLINS 25 17 45 lob 101 73 18 18 8 63 5 41 26 43 6 GROVELAND 16 20 25 54 63 54 14 15 16 70 5 30 32 39 2 GROVELAND FEH HED 3 0 10 2 9 10 4 3 1 9 1 1 0 2 0 GROVELAND FEH HIN 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 LAKEVIEW RECEP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 LAKEVIEW ASAT 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 14 0 LIVINGSTON 1 4 9 1 64 63 6 9 6 56 3 1 2 16 4 ORLEANS 6 14 33 38 94 10' 28 20 13 88 2 22 32 61 4 WENDE 1115 26> 54 53 100 3~ 15 4 25 31 5 21 7 20 7 WYOHING 1ft 9 22 35 106 140 25 41 16 114 5 17 29 75 2 TOTAL 707 164 390 354 8100 675 1610 159 128 573 43 179 142 350 45 6.4% 1.5% 3.6% 3.2% 7.8% 6.1% 1.5% 1.4Y. 1.2% 5.2% .4Y. 1.6% 1.3% 3.2% .4% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 434 70 109 115 .~ 231 83 25 14 31 68 9 38 10 39 26 BUTLER SHOCK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 BUTLER ASACTC 0 0 3 0 12 13 3 0 1 8 0 0 1 11 0 CAMP GEORGETOWN 0 0 0 0 19 42 2 3 0 14 0 0 0 19 0 CAHP PHARSALIA 0 0 0 0 8 13 2 3 1 9 0 0 0 7 0 CAYUGA 4 17 17 21 131 82 32 16 8 49 3 12 4 48 2 ELHIRA 193 57 119 76 240 120 48 34 31 107 11 50 29 56 7 HONTEREY SHOCK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 0 ROCHESTER 2 0 1 0 11 0 5 3 25 9 0 0 3 0 SOUTHPORT 93 33 49 27 119"' 93 12 5 7 31 1 7 4 24 9 TOTAL 726 177 298 239 767 457 124 80 82 311 24 107 48 209 44 11.9Y. 2.9% 4.9% 3.9% 12.6Y. 7.5% 2.0y' 1.3Y. 1.3Y. 5.1Y. .4% 1.8% .8% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 3.4Y. .7% ARTHURKILL 16 23 46 33 112 85 12 14 9 61 3 21 11 44 7 BAYVIEW 3 1 11 2 10 7 4 3 1 7 1 1 0 1 1 BAYVIEW WORK REL 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 EDGECOH8E 2 3 10 0 59 36 1 3 2 15 0 0 0 15 0 FULTON 3 5 9 0 40 34 4 2 2 24 1 0 0 18 1 LINCOLN 3 3 12 0 45 37 2 1 2 13 0 0 0 21 0 PARKSIDE 0 0 7 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 0 QUEENSBORO 8 6 17 0 73 102 9 3 2 57 0 0 0 27 0 TOTAL 310 41 112 35 344 264 32 26 18 183 5 22 11 127 9 . 1.lY. 1.2% 3.3% 1.0% 10.1% 7.7'1. .9% .8X .5% 5.4% .1% .6% .3% 3.7% .3% GRAND TOTAL 4529 1181 2673 1785 6540 4227 898 728 662 2942 185 815 498 2070 270 1.8% 2.0% 4.6Y. 3.1% 11.3Y. 7.3% 1.6Y. 1.3Y. 1.lX 5.1% .3% 1.4% .9Y. 3."y' .5%

(continued) -29-

TABLE 11 CLUSTER AND FACILITV BV CRIHE STATUS; UNDERCUSTODV POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER HANS LA OTHER ROB ASAULT SEX OTHER DRUG BURGLA GRAND FORGRV STOLEN DRIVE OTHER YOUTH TOTAL AND FACILITV 2ND HOHICI 3RD 2(ATT) CRIHES COERCI CRIHES RV 3RD LARCNV PROPTV INTOXI FELONV OFFNDR ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 0 2 1 1 0 0 98 4 1 0 1 2 0 0 182 HARCV 2 4 31 7 16 17 578 96 40 13 33 21 6 3 1441 HID-STATE 6 6 38 4 10 11 547 53 29 3 25 5 7 2 1380 HOHAWK 6 2 29 3 4 6 597 80 35 9 30 27 7 4 1207 ONIEDA 7 2 23 5 21 9 365 57 40 13 21 12 9 3 1083 SUI1HIT SHOK HALE 0 0 3 0 0 0 56 6 6 0 3 0 0 3 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 0 0 0 0 0 1 82 2 1 3 0 0 0 1 90 TOTAL 21 16 125 20 51 44 2323 298 152 41 113 67 29 16 5460 .4% .3% 2.3% .4% .9% .8% 42.5Y. 5.5% 2.8% .8% 2.1% 1.2% .5% .3% 100Y. WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR .., 2 21 5 5 4 352 41 27 4 22 4 3 4 789 OGDENSBURG 3 2 22 4 1 10 340 53 24 7 28 4 8 3 799

WATERTOWN 3 5 18 5 4 10 371 ~ 44 29 11 19 9 5 4 816 TOTAL 10 9 61 14 10 24 1063 138 80 22 69 17 16 11 2404 .4% .4% 2.5% .6% .4% 1.0% 44.2% 5.7% 3.3% .9% 2.9% .7% .7% .5Y. 100Y. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 1 2 11 2 9 13 257 39 19 3 12 2 5 4 612 ALTONA 2 1 23 5 2 7 323 24 24 8 16 3 3 5 731 BARE HILL 8 0 45 10 10 11 700 63 30 12 26 14 9 3 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 0 1 4 0 0 4 140 35 14 6 11 12 5 6 302 CHATEAUGAV ASACT 0 0 5 0 0 2 70 6 3 0 2 1 0 0 129 CLINTON 17 2 46 8 37 15 538 52 37 7 17 2 11 5 2781 FRANKLIN 6 1 55 6 5 10 660 92 41 8 35 15 11 7 1542 LVON HOUNTAIN 0 1 2 0 0 1 103 7 9 3 8 2 0 1 160 TOTAL 34 8 191 31 63 63 2791 318 177 47 127 51 44 31 7802 .4% .1% 2.4% .4% .8% .8% 35.8% 4.1% 2.3% .6% 1.6% .7% .6% .4% 100% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 3 0 7 1 1 3 235 10 11 0 7 0 0 0 1141 SHAWANGUNK 1 0 3 0 1 0 59 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 541 SULLIVAN 5 1 5 1 3 6 164 22 14 2 7 5 5 0 722 ULSTER 0 0 20 3 2 5 388 47 29 2 26 0 2 7 796 WALLKILL 4 0 7 0 1 4 145 13 8 1 8 2 0 0 550 WOODBOURNE 10 0 14 2 8 3 245 14 7 2 7 0 1 1 895 TOTAL 23 1 56 7 16 21 1236 106 71 8 55 7 11 8 4645 .5% .0% 1.2% .2% .3% .5% 26.6% 2.3% 1.5% .2% 1.2% .2% .2% .2% 100% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 11 0 11 4 0 4 339 8 16 8 4 0 2 2 736 SING SING 20 1 28 7 4 13 488 30 19 5 22 1 5 2 2264 TACONIC 4 2 6 0 0 2 278 0 10 5 5 1 3 4 401 TOrAL 35 3 45 11 4 19 1105 38 45 18 31 2 10 8 3401 1.0% .1% 1.3% .3% .1% .6% 32.5% 1.1% 1.3% .5% .9% .1% .3% .2% 100% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 1 0 2 0 0 1 163 0 12 12 3 0 4 1 219 DOWNSTATE II 2 43 5 14 II 540 69 37 4 46 13 10 13 1608 FISHKILL 23 2 28 5 11 6 580 37 21 6 13 3 4 3 1797 GREEN HAVEN 7 2 11 1 4 13 339 15 6 3 6 1 2 1 20&7 HID-ORANGE II 2 14 2 1 2 255 22 12 3 13 1 1 1 673 OTISVILLE 2 0 10 3 1 .., 182 10 12 2 4 2 3 1 628 TOTAL 49 II 108 16 31 34 2059 153 100 30 85 20 24 20 6992 .7% .1% 1.5% .2% .4% .5% 29.4% 2.2% 1,(,% .4% 1.2% .3% .3% .3% 100% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 0 2 1 0 0 1 165 21 II 2 11 10 0 3 281 COXSACKIE 13 1 7 3 2 3 136 6 11 3 13 0 4 24 958 GREAT HEADOW 4 1 26 3 4 12 259 36 7 3 14 0 6 4 1543 GREENE 13 2 43 3 3 15 387 27 13 3 26 4 4 47 1537 HUDSON 3 2 5 3 1 3 145 16 5 5 7 8 1 1 449 HUDSON WORK REL 2 0 0 0 0 2 42 6 1 0 2 6 0 0 9& HORIAH SHOCK 0 0 4 0 0 1 105 15 6 4 6 1 1 11 154 HT HCGREGOR 3 2 11 2 3 6 247 27 7 1 8 7 0 2 554 WASHINGTON 5 2 19 2 6 3 397 29 15 4 17 3 6 3 10113 TOTAL 43 12 116 16 19 46 1883 183 73 25 104 39 22 95 6655 .6% .2% 1.7% .2% .3% .7% 28.3% 2.7% 1.1% ATTICA HUB (8) .4% 1.6% .6% .3% 1.4% 100% ALBION FEHALE 1& 2 13 5 0 ') 774 8 43 41 12 3 7 8 1162 ATTICA 12 3 37 8 3 16 312 54 33 6 12 2 6 3 20116 COLLINS 11 2 34 5 24 12 379 41 22 9 29 2 4 4 1133 GROVELAND 9 4 24 11 27 10 309 49 23 10 25 6 11 3 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 3 2 6 2 0 3 204 1 11 7 3 1 1 1 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 0 0 1 0 0 2 91 1 ') 2 2 2 0 2 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 0 0 12 0 0 2 335 43 14 0 23 8 3 26 4&8 LAKEVIEW RECEP 0 0 14 0 0 1 108 14 11 1 6 0 3 11 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 0 0 1 1 0 1 28 4 2 2 2 2 3 8 74 LIVINGSTON 6 2 14 3 1 6 412 51 17 5 12 5 3 6 7118 ORLEANS 6 2 50 7 24 16 468 56 32 16 21 14 12 10 1293 WENDE 3 2 10 2 5 6 120 6 .., 5 5 0 8 1 766 WVOHING 12 7 37 15 23 23 620 93 511 25 SO 16 16 5 1640 TOTAL 78 26 253 59 107 107 4160 421 279 129 202 61 77 88 10982 .7% .2% 2.3% .5% 1.0% 1.0% 37.9% 3.8% 2.5% 1.2% AUBURN HUB (9) 1.8% .6% .7% .8% 100% AUBURN 4 0 24 II II 9 265 34 20 4 14 0 7 7 1706 BUTLER SHOCK 0 0 5 0 0 0 124 17 II 1 4 1 3 12 177 BUTLER ASACTC 0 0 II 0 0 Ii 48 4 3 1 2 0 0 0 123 CAMP GEORGETOWN 0 0 4 0 0 1 93 II 3 2 16 2 0 31 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 1 0 4 0 0 0 107 17 II 1 12 13 1 0 207 CAYUGA 6 1 11 3 5 8 222 20 13 1 16 1 4 37 794 ELHIRA 5 4 24 19 11 13 321 67 32 19 21 15 19 12 1760 HONTEREV SHOCK 0 0 11 0 0 0 108 9 9 3 9 2 2 14 167 ROCHESTER 4 0 0 0 0 2 IJl 14 II 5 3 11 2 2 199 SOUTHPORT 1 0 15 5 0 4 96 19 7 4 9 1 3 8 686 TOTAL 21 5 106 35 24 42 1475 209 111 41 106 46 41 123 60711 .3% .1% 1.7% .6% .4% .7% 24.3% 3.4% 1.11% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) .7% 1.7% .8% .7% 2.0% 100% ARTHURKILL 6 0 27 II 1 7 2511 34 23 3 111 0 7 2 1191 BAVVIEW 0 1 2 0 0 0 93 0 5 6 3 0 2 0 165 BAVVIEW WORK REL 0 0 0 0 0 0 79 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 87 EDGECOHBE 3 2 9 0 0 3 276 10 FULTON 5 0 1 0 2 1 4511 5 2 0 0 0 1 254 10 12 1 II 2 4 2 444 LINCOLN 4 0 2 0 0 1 226 II 3 3 7 0 2 3 398 PARKSIDE 2 2 0 0 0 0 78 QUEENSBORO 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 103 7 4 5 1 0 5 493 22 111 6 17 4 C)\ II 1163 TOTAL 27 11 45 9 1 17 1757 114 69 21 54 6 27 16 3409 .11% .3% 1.3% .3% .0% .5% 51.5% 2.5% 2.0% .6% 1.6% .2% .11% .5% 100% GRAND TOTAL._ 341 99 1106 2111 326 417 19852 19411 1157 382 946 316 301 416 5711211 .6% .2% 1.9% .4% .6% .7% 34.3% 3.4% 2.0% .7% 1.6% .5% .5% .7% 100% -30-

TABLE llB. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY CRIHE TYPEJ UNDER CUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER VIOLENT OTHER DRUG PROPERTY YOUTHFUL TOTAL AND FACILITY FELONY COERCIVE OFFENSES AND OTHER OFFENDR OFFENSES ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 72 4 98 8 0 182 MARCY 574 77 578 209 3 1441 HID-STATE 634 75 547 122 2 1380 HOHAWK 368 50 597 188 4 1207 ONIEDA 496 67 365 152 3 1083 SUMHIT SHOK HALE 0 3 56 15 3 77 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 0 1 82 6 1 90 TOTAL 2144 277 2323 700 16 5460 39.3% 5.1% 42.5% 12.8% .3% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 291 41 352 101 4 789 OGDENSBURG 290 42 34'0 124 3 799 WATERTOWN 279 45 371 117 4 816 TOTAL 860 128 1063 342 11 2404 35.8% 5.3% 44.2% 14.2% .5% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 233 38 257 80 4 612 ALTONA 285 40 323 78 5 731 BARE HILL 604 84 700 154 3 1545 CAMP GABRIELS 64 9 140 83 6 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 40 7 70 12 0 129 CLINTON 1987 125 538 126 5 2781 FRANKLIN 590 83 660 202 7 1542 LYON HOUNTAIN 23 4 103 29 1 160 TOTAL 3826 390 2791 764 31 7802 49.0% 5.0% 35.8% 9.8% .4% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 863 15 235 28 0 1141 SHAWANGUNK 471 5 59 6 0 541 SULLIVAN 482 21 164 55 0 722 ULSTER ~65 30 388 106 7 796 WALLKILL 357 16 145 32 0 550 WOODBOURNE 581 37 245 31 1 895 TOTAL 3019 124 1236 258 8 4645 65.0% 2.n 26.6% 5.6% .2% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 327 30 339 38 2 736 SING SING 16J.9 73 488 82 2 2264 TACONIC 81 14 278 24 4 401 TOTAL 2027 117 1105 144 8 3401 59.6% 3.4% 32.5% 4.2% .2% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HU8 (6) CAMP BEACON FEH 20 4 163 31 1 219 DOWNSTATE 796 80 540 179 13 1608 FISHKILL 1051> 75 580 84 3 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1656 38 339 33 1 2067 HID-ORANGE 336 29 255 52 1 673 OTISVILLE 392 20 182 33 1 628 TOTAL 4255 246 2059 412 20 6992 60.9% 3.5% 29.4% 5.9% .31; 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 57 4 165 52 3 281 COXSACKIE 732 29 136 37 24 958 GREAT HEADOW 1164 50 259 66 4 1543 GREENE 947 79 387 77 47 1537 HUDSON 244 17 145 42 1 449 HUDSON WORK REL 35 4 42 15 0 96 HORIAH SHOCK 0 5 105 33 11 154 HT HCGREGOR 228 27 247 50 2 554 WASHINGTON 572 37 397 74 3 1083 TOTAL 3979 252 1883 446 95 6655 59.8% 3.8% 28.3% 1.4% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) 6.n ALBION FEHAI.E 221 45 774 114 8 1162 ATTICA 1579 79 312 113 3 2086 COLLINS 555 88 379 107 4 1133 GROVELAND 455 85 309 124 3 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 55 16 204 24 1 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 6 3 91 16 2 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 2 14 335 91 26 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 9 15 108 35 11 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 20 3 28 15 8 74 LIVINGSTON 245 32 412 93 6 788 ORLEANS 559 105 468 151 10 1293 WENDE 589 28 120 28 1 766 WYOHING 640 117 620 258 5 1640 TOTAL 4935 630 4160 1169 88 10982 44.9% 5.n 37.9% 10.6% .8% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1302 53 265 79 7 1706 BUTLER SHOCK 2 5 124 34 12 177 BUTLER ASACTe 52 13 48 10 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 99 5 93 31 31 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 43 5 107 52 0 207 CAYUGA 446 34 222 55 37 794 ELHIRA 1178 76 321 173 12 1760 HONTEREY SHOCK 0 11 108 34 14 167 ROCHESTER 57 (, 91 43 2 199 SOUTHPORT 514 25 96 43 8 686 TOTAL 3693 233 1475 554 123 6078 60.8% 3.8% 24.3% 9.1% 2.0% 100.0)( NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 497 49 258 85 2 891 BAYI/IEW 53 3 93 16 0 .165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 6 0 79 2 0 ' 87 EDGECOHBE 146 17 276 18 1 458 FULTON 143 8 254 37 2 444 LINCOLN 139 7 226 23 3 398 PARKSIDE 17 4 78 4 0 103 QUEENSBORO 264 22 493 76 8 863 TOTAL 1265 110 1757 261 16 3409 37.1% 3.2% 51.5% 7.n .5% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 30003 2507 19852 5050 416 57828 51.9% /lj.3% 34.3% 8.7% .7% 100.0% ·-31-

Second Felony Offender Status More than half of the inmates undercustody on January 1, 1992 were second felony offenders (54.8%) (see Table 12). There is variation across the ~lusters in the percent of second felony offenders undercustody (see Figure 12). The range is from 45.9% (cluster 9, Auburn Hub) to 67.0% (cluster 2, Watertown Hub).

Second felony offenders are more heavily concentrated among those committed for drug offenses or property offenses than is the case for violent felony offenses. For example, in the population undercustody on January 1, 1992, 67% of drug offenders were sentenced as a second felony offender as were 69 % of those sentenced for property offenses. Among violent felony offenders only 44% were sentenced as a second felony offender. So, while some clusters may have a higher percent of second felony offenders when compared with other clusters, it is the case that many of these second felony offenders have been convicted of relatively low level (e.g., class D or class E) drug or property offenses which carry comparatively shorter sentences.

Figure 12 Percent Predicate Felony ,

p e r c e n t

1 2 3 " 5 6 7 e 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui S5 GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster '. -32-

TABLE 12. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY SECOND FELONY STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER FIRST SECOND PERSIST TOTAL AND FACILITY FELONY FELONV FELONY OFFENDER OFFENDER OFFENDER ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 38 143 1 182 HARCY 445 968 28 1441 HID-STATE 45B 910 12 1380 HOHAWK 382 816 9 1207 ONIEDA 42S 651 7 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 40 37 0 77 SUHMIT SHOCK FEH 38 52 0 90 TOTAL 1826 3577 57 5460 33.4% 65.5% 1.0% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 262 .' 522 5 789 OGDENSBURG 234 551 14 799 WATERTOWN 268 538 10 816 TOTAL 764 1611 29 2404 31.8% 67.0% 1.2% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 203 403 6 612 ALTONA 259 470 2 731 BARE HILL 489 1039 17 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 134 168 Ii 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 26 101 2 129 CLINTON 1261 1398. 108 2787 FRANKLIN 479 1043 21 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 42 117 1 160 TOTAL 2913 4739 157 7809 37.3% 60.7% 2.0% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 623 456 62 1141 SHAWANGUNK 355 157 29 5(11 SULLIVAN 370 324 28 722 ULSTER 264 531 3 798 WALLKILL 204 329 17 550 WOODBOURNE 350 523 22 895 TOTAL 2166 2320 161 4647 46.6% 49.9% 3.5% 100.0% SING SING HUB ;(5) BEDFORD HILLS 488 245 3 736 SING SING 1009 1156 99 2264 TACONIC 153 248 0 401 TOTAL 1650 1649 102 3401 48.5% 48.5% 3.0% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 70 149 0 219 DOWNSTATE 696 911 35 1642 FISHKILL 746 1016 35 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1203 735 129 2067 HID-ORANGE 214 444 15 673 OTISVILLE 247 368 13 628 TOTAL 3176 3623 227 7026 45.2% 51.6% 3.2% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 87 193 1 281 COXSACKIE 664 286 9 959 GREAT HEADOW 703 787 54 1544 GREENE 989 536 13 1538 HUDSON 178 266 5 449 HUDSON WORK REL 60 34 2 96 MORIAH SHOCK 88 66 0 154 I1T MCGREGOR 155 393 6 554 WASHINGTON 405 659 20 1084 TOTAL 3329 3220 110 6659 50.0% 48.4% 1.7% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEMALE 522 638 2 1162 ATTICA 971 1002 113 2086 COLLINS 474 651 8 1133 GROVELAND 374 600 2 976 GROVELAND FEM HED , 134 163 3 300 GROVELAND FE" HIN 55 63 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 240 226 2 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 95 82 1 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT SO 24 0 74 LIVINGSTON 186 596 6 788 ORLEANS 514 770 9 1293 WENOE 407 339 42 788 WYOMING 604 1027 '9 1640 TOTAL 4626 6181 197 11004 42.0% 56.2% 1.8% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) ,AUBURN 862 766 83 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 98 79 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 39 84 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 173 86 0 2S9 CAHP PHARSALIA 69 135 3 207 CAYUGA 517 274 3 794 ELHIRA 831 868 66 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 87 80 0 167 ROCHESTER 113 86 0 199 SOUTHPORT 323 336 27 686 TOTAL 3112 2794 182 6088 51.1% 45.9% 3.0% 100.0% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 328 554 '9 891 BAYVIEW 55 110 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REl 27 59 1 87 EDGECOHBE 140 315 3 458 FULTON 170 272 2 444 LINCOLN 164 233 1 398 PARKSIDE 44 S9 0 103 QUEENSDORO 414 444 5 863 TOTAL 1342 2046 21 3409 '. 39.4% 60.0% .6% 100.0% CRAND TOTAL 24904 31760 1243 57907 43.0% 54.8% 2.1% 100.0% \.

-33-

Prior Adult Criminal Record

According to Table 13, a majority of the inmates undercustody (53.4 %) had either served a prior jail term (25.5%) or a prior prison term (27.9%).10 A quarter (25.0%) had a prior conviction without prior jailor prior prison. A little more than a fifth (21.6%) had no prior conviction (10.7%) or no prior arrest (10.8%).

The percent of inmates with a prior prison term varies from 23 % in clusters 7 (Great Meadow Hub) and 10 (New York City work release) to approximately 32% in cluster 1 (Oneida Hub) (see Figure 13).

Figure 13 Percent With Prior Prison Sentence

50

40

p e 30 r c e n 20 t

10

1 2 3 " 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster

. l<;ne groups used for this variable are mutally exclusive. Only the most serious prior contact with the criminal justice system is listed, for each irunat¢. -34-

TABLE 13. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY PRIOR ADULT CRIHINAl RECORDl UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NO PRIOR NO PRIOR CONVICTN PRIOR JAIL PRIOR TOTAL AND FACILITY ARREST CONVICTION NO JAIL TERH PRISON TERH ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 11 JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 9 6 42 66 59 182 HARCY 108 96 342 391 503 1440 HID-STATE 128 95 331 385 435 1374 MOHAWK 76 90 256 403 380 1205 ONIEDA 91 88 265 295 343 1082 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 12 4 22 38 1 77 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 22 2 24 42 0 90 TOTAL 446 381 1282 1620 1721 5450 8,2Y. 1.0Y. 23.5Y. 29.7Y. 31.6Y. 100.0Y. WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 64 70 180 240 234 788 OGDENSBURG 55 53 " 180 265 246 799 WATERTOWN 74 44 193 261 242 814 TOTAL 193 167 553 766 722 2401 8.0Y. 7.0Y. 23.0Y. 31.9Y. 30.1Y. 100.0Y. '. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 55 45 158 175 178 611 ALTONA 66 55 177 220 208 726 BARE HILL 130 117 373 453 470 1543 CAHP GABRIELS 32 21 64 115 70 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 6 3 25 54 41 129 CLINTON 318 33!- 678 SOD 925 2756 FRANKLIN 109 89 371 491 480 154;) LYON HOUNTAIN 5 13 37 65 40 160 TOTAL 721 678 1883 2073 2412 7767 9.~% s.n 24.2% 26.7% 51.1Y. 100.0Y. SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 123 171 286 186 351 1117 SHAWANGUNK 51 120 142 71 147 531 SULLIVAN 56 124 177 139 207 703 ULSTER 69 48 113 204 230 664 WALLKILL 53 57 143 109 176 538 WOODBOURNE 94 84 241 179 285 883 TOTAL 446 604 1102 888 1396 4436 10.1% 13.6Y. 24.8Y. 20.0% 31.5Y. 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 187 105 104 207 73 676 SING SING 257 276 563 376 764 2236 TACONIC 60 38 63 171 69 401 TOTAL 504 419 730 754 906 3313 15.2Y. 12.6% 22.0% 22.8% 27.3Y. 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEN 18 9 36 108 48 219 DOWNSTATE 1&8 158 373 377 436 1512 FISHKILL 233 186 478 372 521 1790 GREEN HAVEN 290 311 547 288 605 2041 HID-ORANGE 68 55 158 156 230 667 OTISVILLE 64 56 169 128 204 621 TilTAL 841 775 1761 1429 2044 6850 12.3Y. 11.SY. 25.7Y. 20.9Y. 29.8% 100.0Y. GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 21 16 84 92 68 281 CO)(SACKIE 149 204 265 240 101 959 GREAT MEADOW 132 192 403 326 474 1527 GREENE 302 239 379 347 266 ,1533 HUDSON 35 50 124 109 128 446 HUDSON WORK MEL 14 11 35 21 15 96 HORIAH SHOCK 27 17 52 57 1 154 HT HCGREGOR 34 40 138 159 181 552 WASHINGTON 101 110 282 285 299 1077 TOTAL 815 879 1762 16~6 1533 6625 12.3Y. 13.3Y. 26.6Y. 24.7Y. 23.1% ATTICA HUB (8) 100.0% ALBION FEHALE 200 98 236 468 159 1161 ATTICA 165 280 470 428 716 2059 COLLINS 137 112 284 278 312 1123 GROVELAND 65 83 232 259 ;',.'30 969 GROVELAND FEH HED 52 28 59 127 32 298 GROVELAND FEH HIN 18 13 2~1 51 7 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 70 49 144 197 8 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 27 26 58 65 2 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 14 8 23 23 6 74 LIVINGSTON 38 33 201 253 262 787 ORLEANS 136 102 2e,8 359 402 1287 WENDE 68 115 21.6 139 219 757 WYOHING 141 126 418 441 506 1632 TOTAL 1131 1073 2658 3088 2961 10911 10.4Y. 9.8Y. 24.4% 28.3Y. 27.1Y. 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 140 272 459 317 484 1672 BUTLER SHOCK 25 19 55 76 2 177 BUTLER ASACTC 9 7 26 37 44 123 CAMP GEORGETOWN 47 39 60 70 43 259 CAMP PHARSALIA 15 10 44 89 48 206 CAYUGA 108 139 221 215 111 794 ELMIRA 191 204 447 369 525 1736 MONTEREY SHOCK 24 19 55 69 0 167 ROCHESTER 23 23 75 46 32 199 SOUTtIPORT 49 92 176 166 201 684 TOTAL 631 824 1618 1454 1490 6017 10.5% 13.7Y. 26.9% 24.2Y. 24.8% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 100.0Y. ARTHURKILL 95 86 224 192 287 884 tAYVIEW 21 11 28 70 31 161 BAYVIEW WORK REL 13 16 41 13 87 EOOECOIUIE 52 39" 124 115 126 456 FULTON 57 33 126 142 86 444 LINCOLN 55 50 123 85 82 395 PUKSIDE 22 11 30 32 a 103 QUEEHSBORO 132 101 264 216 149 862 TOTAL 447 335 935 893 782 3392 13.2% 9.9Y. 27.6Y. 26.3% 23.1% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 6175 6135 14284 14601 15967 57162 10.ay. 10.7% 25.0Y. 25.5% 27.9Y. 100.0% -35-

Length of Time Served at Current Holding Facility

The average amount of time served at the current facility for the population undercustody was 9.9 months and the median was 5.5 months (see Table 14 and 14B). Among the clusters, there is some variation in the average time served at current facility and in the median time served at current facility. For example, among the clusters, the range in average time served is 5.9 months (cluster 2, Watertm~,m Hub) to 13.8 months (cluster 6, Green Haven Hub). The range in average time is even higher for individual facilities; from 0.4 months at Lakeview Reception to 25.7 months at Green Haven Correctional Facility. The median time among cluster'S ranged from 4.6 at cluster 2 to 8.5 months at cluster 4 (see figure 14). Among facilities the median ranged from 0.1 months (Lakeview Reception) to 17.3 months (Shawangunk Correctional Facility). Knowing how long inmates are housed at a particular facility is relevant for program purposes in that it is less disruptive to the inmate's education and training career . if he or she is able to complete programs prior to transfer or release.

Figure 14 Median Time Served At Current Fapility (In Months)

12

8.5

M 8 e d i 6 a n 4

2

1 2 3 <4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII SuI SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop ClUster -36-

TABLE 14. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIHE SE~VED AT CURRENT FACILITY (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY ~OPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER 0-2 HO 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-17 18-23 24-29 30-35 36-47 48-71 72 + TOTAL ONEIDA HB,CLUSTER 1 JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 30 101 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 182 HARCY 702 274 119 155 104 81 5 1 0 0 0 1441 HID-STATE 296 262 198 170 283 105 28 19 9 10 0 1380 HOHAWK 347 451 226 95 73 14 1 0 0 0 0 1207 ONIEDA 497 188 142 82 99 38 21 9 7 0 0 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 27 41 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH SO 35 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 SUBTOTAL 1949 1352 750 502 559 238 55 29 16 10 0 5460 35.7% 24.8% 13.7% 9.2% 10.2% 4.4% 1.0% .5% .3% .2% .0% 100% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 195 283 171' 85 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 789 OGDENSBURG 308 207 141 71 48 14 8 1 1 0 0 799 WATERTOWN 217 270 154 72 55 24 17 5 1 1 0 816 SUBTOTAL 720 760 466 228 158 38 25 6 2 1 0 2404 30.0% 31.6% 19.4% 9.5% 6.6% 1.6% 1.0% .2% .1% .0% .0% 100% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 212 139 134 38 47 19 14 4 4 1 0 612 ALTONA 371 152 90 29 54 22 5 3 4 1 0 731 BARE HILL 281 375 277 196 220 155 31 8 2 0 0 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 86 121 62 25 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 31 42 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 CLINTON 750 424 359 246 295 206 122 78 113 119 40 2752 FRANKLIN 415 420 242 178 157 111 10 5 2 3 0 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 38 51 30 23 11 6 0 1 0 0 0 160 SUBTOTAL 2184 1724 1250 735 791 520 182 99 125 124 40 7774 28.1% 22.2% 16.1% 9.5% 10.2% 6.7% 2.3% 1.3% 1.6% 1.6% .5% 100% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 105 160 126 128 125 94 57 54 116 116 45 1126 SHAWANGUNK 69 60 43 48 62 61 45 46 63 44 0 541 SULLIVAN 130 142 125 75 79 41 34 29 41 23 3 722 ULSTER 743 31 11 9 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 798 WALLKILL 77 97 80 65 88 50 34 18 33 6 1 549 WOODBOURNE 134 155 120 96 117 102 64 49 36 20 2 895 SUBTOTAL 1258 645 505 421 475 348 234 196 289 209 51 4631 27.2% 13.9% 10.9% 9.1% 10.3% 7.5% 5.1% 4.2% 6.2% 4.5% 1.1% 100% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 2a6 67 60 41 48 42 22 28 26 52 64 736 SING SING 884 394 236 142 158 124 112 22 28 106 35 2241 TACONIC 127 72 68 59 45 7 14 9 0 0 0 401 SUBTOTAL 1297 533 364 242 251 173 148 59 54 158 99 3378 38.4% 15.8% 10.8% 7.2% 7.4% 5.1% 4.4% 1.7% 1.6% 4.7% 2.9% 100% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 62 92 30 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 DOWNSTATE 1219 172 80 36 75 26 7 6 5 10 3 1641 FISHKILL 446 1129 176 165 161 157 111 82 85 60 4 1796 GREEN HAVEN 261 258 155 125 203 199 138 115 153 198 154 1959 HID-ORANGE 153 128 104 87 62 53 41 24 18 3 0 673 OTISVILLE 140 116 103 67 108 46 19 10 16 3 0 628 SUBTOTAL 2281 1095 648 517 629 481 316 237 277 274 161 6916 33.0% 15.8% 9.4% 7.5% 9.1% 7.0% 4.6% 3.4% 4.0% 4.0% 2.3% 100% GREAT HEADOW HB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 71 72 56 47 32 3 0 0 0 0 0 281 COXSACKIE 252 200 153 147 1111 26 17 11 21 10 2 957 GREAT HEADOW 266 294 228 227 246 98 34 39 41 44 14 1531 GREENE 678 195 362 123 116 35 14 7 5 3 0 1538 HUDSON 114 101 76 56 58 28 6 6 4 0 0 449 HUDSON WORK REL 57 15 11 5 (> 2 0 0 0 0 0 96 HORIAH SHOCK 80 69 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR :i.:':' 151 95 60 62 14 9 0 1 1 0 554 WASHINGTaN 409 249 165 105 49 57 17 8 18 7 0 1084 SUBTOTAL 2088 1346 1151 770 687 263 97 71 90 65 16 6644 31.4% 20.3% 17.3% 11.6% 10.3% 4.0% 1.5% 1.1% 1.4% 1.0% .2% 100% ATTICA HUB (81 ALBION FEHALE 446 430 119 65 49 24 14 11 2 0 0 1160 ATTICA 370 337 3119 175 211 169 62 63 95 78 78 2027 COLLINS 191 263 205 95 137 82 50 42 40 24 3 1132 GROVELAND 146 244 158 139 134 69 34 27 19 4 2 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 109 52 45 21 34 22 11 6 0 0 0 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 29 35 34 15 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 272 161 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 175 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 66 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 243 186 239 120 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 788 ORLEANS 638 213 165 65 80 47 16 6 11 2 0 1293 WENDE 166 132 115 52 102 60 37 36 30 51 4 785 WYOHI~ 415 475 2112 177 162 76 24 18 8 2 1 1640 SUBTOTAL 3316 2538 1787 924 912 551 2411 209 205 161 88 10939 30.3% 23.2% 16.3% 8.4% 8.3% 5.0% 2.3% 1.9% 1.9% 1.5% .8% 100% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 332 225 182 142 181 171 99 39 97 107 69 1644 BUTLER SHOCK 76 99 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 60 28 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 115 109 23 10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 68 83 35 5 13 3 0 0 0 0 0 207 CAYUGA 2017 210 151 56 129 24 11 4 2 0 0 794 ELHIRA 697 279 216 201 158 86 34 32 31 17 7 1758 HONTEREY SHOCK 113 83 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 106 49 18 10 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 199 SOUTHPORT 197 162 146 170 3 4 3 1 0 0 0 636 SUBTOTAL 1941 1327 809 594 496 294 147 76 130 124 76 6014 32.3% 22.1% 13.5% 9.9% 8.2% 4.9% 2.4% 1.3% 2.2% 2.1% 1.3% 100% tlEW YORK CITY (10) ARTHURKILL 278 150 115 81 95 72 32 20 23 22 2 890 BAYVIEW 311 36 42 5 38 1 2 1 2 0 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 30 46 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87 EDGECOI1BE 153 1111 58 26 36 4 0 0 0 0 0 458 FULTON 104 157 86 41 SS 1 0 0 0 0 0 444 LINCOLN 115 122 'Il 22 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 398 PARKSIDE li> 78 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 QUEENSBORO 1711 310 146 96 110 22 1 0 0 0, 0 863 SUBTOTAL 912 1080 556 273 382 100 35 21 25 22 : 2 34011 .. 26.11% 31.7% 16.3% 8.0% 11.2% 2.9% 1.0% .6% .7% .6% .1% 100% GRAND TOTAL 17946 12400 8286 5206 5340 3006 14117 1003 1213 1148 533 57563 31.2% 21.5% 14.4% 9.0% 9.3% 5.2% 2.6% 1.7% 2.1% 2.0% i .9% 100%

~--~------~---- -37-

TABLE 14B. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIHE SERVED AT CURRENT FACILITY (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NUMBER AVERAGE HE DIAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 4.9 5.6 HARCY 1441 5.3 3.2 HID-STATE 1380 9.8 7.9 HOHAWK 1207 5.4 4.3 ONIEDA 1083 6.0 3.7 SUMMIT SHOK HALE 77 3.7 4.3 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 90 2.9 2.9 SUBTOTAL 5460 6.5 4.8 WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 5.6 4.8 OGDENSBURG 799 5.5 4.6 WATERTOWN 816 . 6.6 4.6 SUBTOTAL 2404 5.9 4.6 CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 6.8 4.9 ALTONA 731 5.6 2.9 BARE HILL 1545 9.0 7.6 CAHP GABRIELS 302 4.8 3.6 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 129 4.9 , 5.0 CLINTON 2787 13.7 7.8 FRANKLIN 1543 7.5 5.3 LYON l10UNTAIN 160 6.6 5.3 SUBTOTAL 7809 .9.6 6.0 SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1141 22.9 13.7 SHAWANGUNK 541 20.7 17.3 SULLIVAN 722 13.3 7.7 ULSTER 798 1.0 .5 WALLKILL 550 13.4 9.8 WOODBOURNE 895 14.4 10.3 SUBTOTAL 4647 14.6 8.5 SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 736 21.7 6.8 SING SING 2264 11.5 4.8 TACONIC 401 7.8 6.0 SUBTOTAL 3401 13.2 5.0 GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 219 4.8 4.3 DOWNSTATE 1642 3.4 .7 FISHKILL 1797 13.4 7.8 GREEN HAVEN 2067 25.9 16.8 HID-ORANGE 673 10.9 7.8 OTISVILLE 628 10.2 7.5 SUBTOTAL 7026 13.8 6.4 GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) C"HP HCGREGOR 281 6.4 6.0 COllSACKIE 959 9.0 6.6 GREAT i1EADOW 1544 12.4 8.7 GREENE 1538 5.9 4.3 HUDSON 449 8.2 6.6 HUDSON WORK REL 96 4.2 2.5 HORIAH SHOCK 154 2.9 2.1 HT HCGREGOR !;Z4 6.8 5.3 WASHINGTON 1084 7.2 4.3 SUBTOTAL 6659 8.2 5.7 ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1162 5.3 3.6 ATTICA 2086 16.2 8.4 COLLINS U33 12.1 7.7 GROVELAND 976 10.5 8.1 GROVELAND FEH HED 300 7.8 5.3 GROVELAND FEH HIN 118 5.8 5.5 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 2.4 2.4 LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 .4 .1 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 1.0 .4 LIVINGSTON 788 5.7 5.2 ORLEANS 1293 5.2 2.6 WENDE 788 15.0 8.1 WYOHING 1640 7.4 5.5 SUBTOTAL 11004 9.4 5.5 AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1711 18.6 11.0 BUTLER SHOCK 177 3.8 3.8 BUTLER ASACTC 123 4.1 3.2 CAMP GEORGETOWN 259 3.6 3.3 CAHP PHARSALIA 207 4.9 4.3 CAYUGA 794 7.2 £0.5 ELHIRA 1765 8.3 li.1 HONTEREY SHOCK 167 3.1 3.6 ROCHESTER 199 4.3 2.8 SOUTHPORT 686 6.0 5.6 SUBTOTAL 6088 9.9 5.5 NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 ;i1l.S 6.5 BAYVIEW 165 -7.8 6.6 BAYVIEW WORK REL 87 3.3 3.8 EDGECOHBE 458 4.9 3.8 FULTON 444 6.0 5.1 LINCOLN 398 5.6 4.8 PARKSIDE 103 4.0 3.9 qUEENSBORO 863 6.6 5.4 SUBTOTAL 3409 7.1 5.0 GRAND TOTAL 57568 9.9 5.5 -38-

Length of Time in Department Custody to Date

Table 15B shows that the inmates on average had spent 28 months in DOCS custody as of January 1, 1992. The median length of time was 15 months.

Table 15 shows that (9.9%) had spent 72 months or more under custody as of January 1, 1992 and 12.2% had spent less than 3 months under custody as of that date.

The number of inmates under custody 72 months or more (5,751) is a rough indicator of the current "long timer" population in New York State correctional facilities. Long term inmates may require a somewhat different sequence (or mix) of education, vocational training and then work assignment than would be true for most other inmates who serve approximately 18 months in state prison (18 months is the median time served in a state prison for those released to parole supervision in 1991).

Figure 15 shows the variability in median time served in DOCS custody by cluster. Inmates in cluster 4 (Sullivan Hub) have served the longest which occurs in part because there are three maximum security institutions in this cluster (Eastern C.F., Shawangunk C.F., and Sullivan C.F.). Cluster 2 (Watertown Hub) with the lowest median time served (8.8 months) has no maximum security facilities.

Figure 15 Median Time Served In DOCS Custody (In Months)

50

40 33 t.1 e 30 d i a n 20

10

0 1 2 3 S 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui'" SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -39-

TABLE 15. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIHE SERVED IN DOCS CUSTODY (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLUSTER 0-2 HO 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-17 18-23 24-29 30-35 36-47 48-71 72 + TOTAL ONEIDA HB,CLUSTER 1 JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 0 6 26 30 68 24 10 6 9 0 3 182 HARCY 392 187 172 174 163 133 61 54 44 32 29 1441 HID-STATE 84 159 242 135 204 172 110 83 75 63 53 1380 HOHAWK 86 363 279 145 171 66 29 12 24 19 13 1207 ONIEDA 150 117 161 134 157 106 74 55 56 49 24 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 24 43 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 32 42 12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90 SUBTOTAL 768 917 902 622 763 501 284 210 208 163 122 5460 14.1% 16.8% 16.5% 11.4% 14.0% 9.2% 5.2% 3.8% 3.8% 3.0% 2.2% lUO% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 61 177 177 78 116 70 36 14 20 20 20 789 OGDENSBURG 103 171 164 98 111 57 36 16 18 13 12 799 WATERTOWN 117 119 133 108 123 .- 85 50 31 21 17 12 816 SUBTOTAL 281 467 474 284 350 212 122 61 59 50 44 2404 11.7% 19.4% 19.7% 11.8% 14.6% 8.8% 5.1% 2.5% 2.5% 2.1% 1.8% 100% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 59 109 112 49 94 68 (,2 24 19 22 14 612 ALTONA 94 265 86 51 79 63 37 11 25 7 13 731 BARE HILL 116 187 254 125 287 281 98 72 50 45 30 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 30 124 69 31 37 6 4 0 1 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 0 3 15 40 31 20 7 7 4 1 1 129 CLINTON 140 147 227 203 337 365 261 207 224 281 393 2785 FRANKLIN 152 238 287 123 286 212 81 49 42 45 28 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 13 45 44 30 14 10 3 0 1 0 0 160 SUBTOTAL 604 1118 1094 652 1165 1025 533 370 366 401 479 7807 7.7% 14.3% llt.O% 8.4% llt.9% 13.1% 6.8% 1t.7% 4.7% 5.1% 6.1% 100% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 15 51 72 41 63 55 1t8 54 93 182 ItS8 1135 SHAWANGUNK 7 10 6 10 28 29 25 21t 48 112 240 S39 SULLIVAN 24 77 68 ItS 56 41 33 38 64 99 177 722 ULSTER 722 29 26 7 10 1 0 0 0 0 3 798 -WALLKILL 6 25 21 19 55 46 40 44 62 101 131 550 WOOOBOURNE 4 33 31 41 75 83 77 91 115 154 188 892 SUBTOTAL 781 225 224 163 287 255 223 251 382 648 1197 4636 16.8% 4.9% 4.8% 3.5% 6.2% 5.5% 4.8% 5.4% 8.2% 14.0% 25.8% 100% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 245 79 61 46 54 43 23 32 29 53 71 736 SING SING 307 3D4 191 108 141 138 96 102 167 235 471 2260 TACONIC 18 87 55 57 69 44 27 17 13 10 4 401 SUBTOTAL 570 470 307 211 264 225 146 151 209 298 546 3397 16.8% 13.8% 9.0% 6.2% 7.8% 6.6% 4.3% 1t.4% 6.2% 8.8% 16.1% 100% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 34 78 44 33 22 4 3 0 0 1 0 219 DOWNSTATE 879 197 134 73 132 78 26 26 23 43 31 1642 FISHKILL 51 57 109 77 169 207 191 160 220 266 287 1794 GREEN HAVEN 34 38 34 52 150 189 157 135 230 351 686 2056 HID-ORANGE 22 39 32 59 97 80 76 46 63 76 82 672 OTISVILLE 8 28 39 27 73 64 63 50 73 92 109 626 SUBTOTAL 1028 437 392 321 643 622 516 1t17 609 829 1195 7009 lit. 7% 6.2% 5.6% 4.6% 9.2% 8.9% 7.4% 5.9% 8.7% 11.8% 17.0% 100% GREAT HEADOW HB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 33 51 71 52 50 18 1 2 2 0 0 280 COXSACKIE 60 109 130 97 178 121t 87 76 63 25 10 959 GREAT HEADOW 21 42 95 77 219 188 153 114 149 187 294 15:19 GREENE 170 252 218 1lt5 204 211 111 68 56 Sit 49 1538 HUDSON 30 35 43 22 51 77 1t6 36 43 26 ItO 449 HUDSON WORK REL 0 3 7 3 15 17 11 9 12 6 13 96 HORIAH SHOCK 76 70 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 154 MT HCGREGOR 57 70 8:1 73 97 59 31 19 23 24 18 5Sit WASHINGTON 51 63 119 94 149 183 115 87 86 74 62 1083 SUBTOTAL 498 695 772 565 963 877 555 411 434 396 486 6652 7.5% 10.4% 11.6% 8.5% 14.5% 13.2% 8.3% 6.2% 6.5% 6.0% 7.3% 100% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEI1ALE 186 437 126 95 108 84 40 35 17 21 13 1162 ATTICA 95 114 200 - 109 218 262 134 153 188 234 371 2078 COLLINS 48 116 179 112 137 111 78 72 99 96 84 1132 GROVELAND 30 119 117 84 185 110 74 61 65 66 63 974 GROVELAND FEM HED 54 38 42 34 48 30 22 12 4 13 3 300 GROVELAND FEH MIN 16 34 30 20 12 4 1 0 0 1 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 216 166 81 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 148 15 12 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 53 18 2 0 0 0 0 1 ., 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 119 148 123 22 152 94 39 26 21 21 23 788 ORLEANS 410 147 142 103 133 122 66 37 59 43 31 1293 WENDE 50 41 77 27 76 72 64 52 70 107 152 788 WYOHING 181 311 322 175 263 162 65 54 45 30 32 1640 SUBTOTAL 1606 1704 14S:I 788 1333 1051 583 503 568 632 772 10993 14.6% 15.5% 13.2Y. 7.2% 12.1% 9.6% 5.3% 4.6% 5.2% 5.7% 7.0% 100Y. AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 64 52 62 68 135 155 143 123 148 253 499 1702 BUTLER SHOCK 35 108 33 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 177 BUTlER ASACTC 0 8 25 23 30 11 8 9 3 4 2 123 CAMP GE.ORGETOWN 50 99 53 26 19 7 5 0 0 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 16 c2 61 18 ;!5 14 It 2 2 3 0 207 CAYUGA 43 155 129 95 163 93 36 30 20 14 16 794 ELMIRA 503 223 236 118 180 lOS 90 62 84 N 89 1764 HONTEREY SHOCK 51 90 25 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 0 4 13 19 36 50 27 16 17 11 6 199 SOUTHPORT 5 14 27 21 73 107 81 76 88 89 105 686 SUBTOTAL 767 815 664 390 661 542 394 318 362 448 717 6078 12.6X 13.ltX 1O.9X 6.4X 10.9X 8.9X 6.5% 5.2% 6.0% 7.4% 11.8X 100% NEW YORK CITY (10) ARTHURKILL 79 86 71 70 109 100 61 50 68 105 91 890 BAYVIEW 1 5 24 38 45 23 7 5 5 6 6 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 0 I) 6 13 35 19 5 5 2 1 1 87 EDGECOHBE 4 2 12 29 88 152 53 32 29 31 26 458 FULTON 10 11 25 37 99 99 53 33 31 31 15 444 LINCOLN 12 8 13 29 93 64 48 41 38 32 20 398 PARKSIDE 0 0 1 10 32 21 11 11 10 5 2 103 QUEENSBORO 20 20 47 72 176 190 90 82 68 66 32 1163 SUBTOTAL 126 132 19'1 298 677 668 328 259 251 277 193 3408 3.n 3.9X 5.8% 8.n 19.9% 19.6% 9.6X 7.6% 7.4% 8.1% 5.7% 100% GRAND TOTAL 7029 6980 6481 lt294 7106 5978 3684 2951 3448 4142 5751 57844 12.2% 12.1% 11.2% 7.4X 12.3% 10.3% 6.4% 5.1X 6.0% 7.2% 9.9X 100% -40-

TABLE 15B. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIHE SERVED IN DOCS CUSTODY (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION ~AN 1, 1992 CLUSTER NUHBER AVERAGE HEDIAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 17.3 13.8 HARCY 1441 13.9 8.3 HID-STATE 1380 20.9 14.3 HOHAWK 1207 11.7 7.5 ONIEDA 1063 18.1 11.6 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 77 4.5 4.8 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 90 3.9 3.5 SUBTOTAL 5460 15.8 9.7 WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 15.3 8.5 OGDENSBURG 799 12.8 8.1 WATERTOWN 816 .' 14.5 9.9 SUBTOTAL 2404 14.2 8.8 CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 16.7 10.3 ALTONA 731 12.3 6.2 BARE HILL 1545 17.9 13.7 CAHP GABRIELS 302 7.3 5.7 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 129 16.6 13.6 CLINTON 2787 36.5 23.3 FRANKLIN 1543 16.0 11.5 LYON HOUNTAIN 160 8.6 7.3 SUBTOTAL 7809 22.9 14.0 SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1141 65.3 59.2 SHAWANGUNK 541 76.4 64.6 SULLIVAN 722 48.9 32.0 ULSTER 798 1.6 .5 WALLKILL 550 53.0 40.2 WOODBOURNE 695 51.1 36.9 SUBTOTAL 4647 48.9 33.0 SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 736 23.7 8.0 SING SING 2264 40.5 21.4 TACONIC 401 :;5.2 10.8 SUBTOTAL 3401 33.9 15.0 GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 219 7.2 5.7 DOWNSTATE 1642 9.1 2.1 FISHKILL 1797 43.5 31.0 GREEN HAVEN 2067 61.9 48.6 HID-ORANGE 673 35.7 24.6 OTISVILLE 628 43.0 30.8 SUBTOTAL 7026 38.9 24.7 GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 281 9.3 8.2 COXSACKIE 959 18.4 15.2 GREAT HEADOW 1544 42.9 29.2 GREENE 1538 18.5 11.7 MUDSON 449 30.2 21.6 HUDSON WORK REL 96 35.7 26.1 HORIAH SHOCK 154 3.6 3.3 HT HCGREGOR 554 18.7 11.6 WASHINGTON 1084 26.7 20.1 SUBTOTAL 6659 25.8 16.8 ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1162 11.2 5.0 ATTICA 20B6 41.4 25.6 COLLINS 1133 28.4 16.3 GROVELAND 976 26.2 15.9 GROVELAND FEH HED 300 15.2 10.4 GROVELAIIO FEH HIN 118 8.2 7.2 LAKEVlIc:" SHOCK 468 3.6 3.7 LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 1.6 .4 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 2.2 .9 LIVINGSTON 788 15.5 9.4 ORLEANS 1293 14.9 7.8 WENDE 788 44.8 28.<, WYOMING 1640 14.5 9.2 SUBTOTAL 11004 23.2 11.7 AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1711 55.7 38.7 BUTLER SHOCK 177 4.4 4.4 BUTLER ASACTC 123 17.8 13.1 CAHP GEORGETOWN 259 6.8 5.4 CAHP PHARSALIA 207 9.9 6.9 CAYUGA 794 16.1 10.9 ELHIRA 1765 17.8 8.0 MONTEREY SHOCK 167 3.9 3.9 ROCHESTER 199 26.2 20.2 SOUTHPORT 686 42.0 30.6 SUBTOTAL 6088 29.7 15.2 NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 31.5 19.4 BAYVIEW 165 20.3 13.6 BAYVIEW WORK REL 87 19.7 15.4 EDGECOHBE 458 28.9 21.0 FULTON 444 25.4 19.9 LINCOLN 398 29.3 21.4 PARKS IDE 103 24.6 20.4 QUEENSBORO 863 26.7 21.1 SUBTOTAL 3409 27.8 20.0 GRAND TOTAL 57844 27.9 15.2 '.

-41-

Estimated Time to Earliest Release

Time to earliest release date is a measure of the earliest possible date at which the inmate can be legally released. Inmates are not necessarily released on this date b~.use the parole board may require the inmate to remain in prison beyond the earliest legal release date.

Table 16B shows that the "average time to earliest release" for the total undercustody population on January 1, 1992 was 36.7 months and the median was 14.1 months.

The range of median time to serve by cluster is considerable. At cluster 10 (New York City Hub), the median time to earliest release is just 6.6 months and at cluster 2 (Watertown Hub), it is 10.1 months. However, at cluster 5 (Sing-Sing Hub) it is 29.6 months (see Figure 16). Looking at figures on average time to earliest release shows even wider variation (e.g. 9.0 months at New York City work release facilities, cluster 10) and 58.9 months at cluster 4 (Sullivan Hub).

Figure 16 Median Time To Earliest Release (In Months)

50

40 31 M e 30 d i a n 20

10

0 1 2 S 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui S5 OH OM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster -42-

TABLE 16 CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIME TO EARLIEST RELEASE (IN HONTHS); UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER 0-2 HO 3-5 6-8 9-11 12-17 18-23 24-29 30-35 36-47 48-71 72 + TOTAL ONEIDA HUB ICLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 0 8 44 85 45 a 0 0 0 0 0 182 HARCY 86 139 173 165 407 151 142 87 81 8 0 1439 HID-STATE 153 186 169 145 231 206 116 82 72 14 0 1374 HOHAWK 147 200 168 167 219 139 77 33 33 17 5 1205 ONIEDA 226 211 139 85 165 118 57 32 41 5 1 1080 SUMMIT SHOCK HALE 1 9 10 16 18 14 5 4 0 0 0 17 SUMHIT SHOCK FEH 1 6 12 13 22 19 11 6 0 0 G 90 TOTAL 614 759 715 676 1107 647 408 244 227 44 6 5447 11.3% 13.9% 13.1% 12.4% 20.3% 11.9% 7.5% 4.5% 4.2% .8% .1% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR III 131 100 94 123 94 66 31 26 6 0 782 OGDENSBURG 108 118 92 114 135 91 63 30 33 13 0 797 WATERTOWN 122 140 95 89 129 91~' 57 36 43 9 1 812 TOTAL 341 389 287 297 387 276 186 97 102 28 1 2391 14.3% 16.3% 12.0% 12.4% 16.2% 11.5% 7.8% 4.1% 4.3% 1.2% .0% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 87 108 76 80 92 61 43 24 35 5 0 611 ALTONA 95 122 86 64 125 100 64 38 24 10 1 729 BARE HILL 224 220 165 148 247 146 130 90 129 38 0 1537 CAMP GABRIELS 55 75 54 47 52 16 2 0 0 0 0 301 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 1 11 31 37 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 CLINTON 181 265 204 168 243 179 118 97 188 316 810 2769 FRANKLIN 221 281 184 147 224 179 114 69 81 34 2 1536 LVON HOUNTAIN 14 25 14 20 23 30 30 4 0 0 0 160 TOTAL 878 1107 814 711 1055 711 501 322 457 403 813 7772 11.3% 14.2% 10.5% 9.1% 13.6% 9.1% 6.4% 4.1% 5.9% 5.2% 10.5% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 46 48 48 41 79 63 46 32 72 182 477 1134 SHAWANGUNK 13 18 7 12 28 16 17 13 37 85 292 538 SULLIVAN 65 77 58 59 79 37 20 17 26 68 206 712 ULSTER 18 37 77 90 222 158 77 43 55 16 0 793 WALLKILL 57 78 60 66 85 78 37 25 37 18 0 541 WOODBOURNE 86 106 100 80 153 132 66 61 74 14 2 874 TOTAL 285 364 350 348 646 484 263 I'll 301 383 977 4592 6.2% 7.9% 7.6% 7.6% 14.1% 10.5% 5.7% 4.2% 6.6% 8.3% 21.3% 100.0% SING SING HUB IS) BEDFORD HILLS 40 48 44 54 85 82 57 25 42 73 184 734 SING SING 120 135 109 96 195 144 103 97 170 353 725 2247 TACONIC 54 65 64 64 67 43 17 16 8 1 0 399 TOTAL 214 248 217 214 347 269 177 138 220 427 909 3380 6.3% 7.3% 6.4% 6.3% 10.3% 8.0% 5.2% 4.1% 6.5% 12.6% 26.9% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) BEACON FEHALE 31 33 53 38 34 19 8 2 0 0 0 218 DOWNSTATE 113 125 142 125 211 192 94 80 137 153 220 1592 FISHKILL 219 293 179 194 268 213 121 73 142 67 3 1772 GREEN HAVEN 62 70 63 46 102 55 55 60 138 324 1066 2041 MID-ORANGE 75 73 79 76 107 92 61 44 38 22 0 667 OTISVILLE 81 87 66 59 94 74 53 41 48 19 1 623 TOTAL 581 681 582 538 816 645 392 300 503 585 1290 6913 8.4% 9.9% 8.4% 7.8% 11.8% 9.3% 5.7% 4.3% 7.3% 8.5)',- 18.7% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 45 52 61 52 60 10 0 0 0 0 0 280 COXSACKIE 87 99 82 53 79 54 49 43 75 159 179 959 GREAT HEADOW 120 166 127 90 142 87 68 48 82 163 439 1532 GREENE 178 229 177 162 239 182 129 83 123 32 0 1534 HUDSON 58 83 45 37 80 73 33 19 15 '2 0 445 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 28 28 19 9 7 3 2 0 0 0 0 96 MORIAH SHOCK 1 23 26 22 33 28 14 7 0 0 0 154 HT MCGREGOR 53 81 79 73 143 63 31 6 17 7 0 553 WASHINGTON 137 166 143 106 149 119 84 62 75 38 0 1079 TOTAL 707 927 759 604 932 619 410 268 387 401 618 6632 111.7% 14.0% 11.4% 9.1% 14.1% 9.3% ATTICA HUB (8) 6.2% 4.0% 5.8% 6.0% 9.3% 100.0% ALBION FEHALE 170 193 147 112 227 127 80 37 54 13 II 1160 ATTICA 146 165 143 92 159 115 77 73 120 259 719 2068 COLLINS 143 179 132 109 171 142 90 54 84 20 1 1125 GROVELAND 126 158 145 92 135 115 75 50 51 23 0 970 GROVELAND FEH HED 49 46 41 27 60 31 20 9 14 2 0 299 GROVELAND FEH HIN 22 23 18 19 14 9 10 3 0 0 0 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 13 41 74 80 127 64 44 25 0 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 1 8 26 33 41 34 24 10 0 0 0 177 LAKEVIEW ASAT 10 5 16 15 14 8 4 2 0 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 29 20 103 132 283 177 21 10 9 4 0 788 ORLEANS 141 166 168 102 202 154 123 76 108 45 2 1287 WENDE 30 43 38 36 53 36, WVOMING 28 23 42 113 320 762 209 266 232 189 264 164 114 71 99 32 0 1640 TOTAL 1089 1313 1283 1038 1750 1176 710 443 581 511 1042 10936 10.0% 12.0% 11.7% 9.5% 16.0% 10.8% 6.5% 4.1% AUBURN HUB (9) 5.3% 4.7Y. 9.5r. 100.0% AUBURN 102 148 104 82 132 81 BUTLER 71 45 101 188 638 1692 SHOCK 3 31 32 16 38 23 21 13 G 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 1 3 29 34 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 43 66 60 37 51 2 0 0 0 0 0 259 CAMP PHARSALIA 21 40 38 54 38 15 1 0 0 0 0 207 CAVUGA 104 178 106 70 128 62 ELMIRA 55 29 49 12 0 793 101 135 107 97 146 114 97 74 116 246 520 1753 HONTEREV SHOCK 3 27 24 25 51 14 ROCHESTER 16 7 0 0 0 167 52 70 n 17 18 3 1 0 0 1 0 199 SOUTHPORT 58 90 '13 49 91 39 TOTAL 31 15 32 58 148 684 488 788 610 481 749 353 293 183 298 505 1306 6054 8.1% 13.0% 10.1% 7,.9% 12.4% 5.8% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 4.8% 3.0% 4.9% 8.3% 21.6% 100.0% ARTHURKIlL 109 129 101 97 171 123 64 33 40 15 0 882 BAVVIEW 29 27 30 17 28 15 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 11 2 5 1 0 165 17 19 15 14 17 4 0 G 0 0 0 .'6 EDGECOHBE 96 119 131 52 40 FULTON 11 Ii 1 0 0 1 456 114 117 65 50 81 15 1 0 1 0 0 41";4 LINCOLN 100 97 64 37 76 21 PARKSIDE 2 0 0 0 0 397 30 23 17 13 18 1 0 0 0 1 0 103 QUEENSBORO 226 216 138 118 130 28 TOTAL 1 1 0 0 1 859 721 747 561 398 561 218 84 37 46 17 2 3392 21.3% 22.0% 16.5Y. 11.7% 16.5Y. 6.4% 2.5Y. 1.1% 1.4Y. .5% .1Y. lOO.O% GRAND TOTAl. 5918 7323 6178 5305 8350 5398 3424 2223 3122 3304 6964 57509 10.3% 12.7% 10.7% 9.2% 14.5% 9.4% 6.0% 3.9% 5.4% 5.7% 12.1Y. 100.0% -43-

TABLE 16B. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY TIHE TO EARLIEST RELEASE (IN HONTHS); UNDER CUSTODY POPULATION ~AH 1, 1992 CLUSTER NUHBER AVG HEDIAN ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) ~OHNSTOWN ASACTC 182 10.0 10.1 HARCY 1441 15.6 13.3 HID-STATE 1380 14.8 12.4 HOHAWK 1207 13.3 10.1 ONIEDA 1083 11.2 7.8 SUHHIT SHOCK HALE . 77 13.9 12.2 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 90 15.8 14.4 TOTAL 5460 13.8 11.3 WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 789 12.8 9.8 OGDENSBURG 799 13.5 10.6 WATERTOWN 816 13.5 10.0 TOTAL 2404 13.3 10.1 CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 612 13.1 10.0 ALTONA 731 13.9 11.3 BARE HILL 1545 15.5 11.7 CAHP GABRIELS 302 7.6 6.5 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 129 10.1 10.2 CLINTON 2787 73.4 31.0 FRANKLIN 1543 14.0 10.0 LYON HOUNTAIN 160 14.3 13.8 TOTAL 7809 35.1 13.4 SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 1141 79.7 58.9 SHAWANGUNK 541 175.8 82.4 SULLIVAN 722 66.3 19.8 ULSTER 798 18.2 15.9 WALLKILL 550 15.8 12.4 WOODBOURNE 895 17.5 13.9 TOTAL 4647 S8.9 0!'!.8 SING SING HUB (S) BEDFORD HILLS 736 5S.1 24.7 SING SING 2264 68.0 44.S TACONIC 401 11.4 9.2 TOTAL 3401 58.6 29.6 GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) BEACON FEHALE 219 9.5 8.0 DOWNSTATE 1642 43.6 19.9 FISHKILL 1797 lS.7 11.5 GREEN HAVEN 2067 106.7 7S.6 HID-ORANGE 673 16.:: 13.1 OTISVILLE 628 16.3 13.0 TOTAL 7026 48.9 19.9 GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 281 8.0 7.5 COXSACKIE 959 4S.1 26.2 GREAT HEADOW 1544 72.0 26.5 GREENE IS38 1S.6 12.0 HUDSON 449 13.3 11.3 ~DSOH WORK RELEASe 96 5.9 4.3 ttoRIAH SHOCK IS4 13.6 12.3 HT HCGREGOR 554 12.8 11.2 WASHINGTON 1084 IS.S 11.1 TOTAL 6659 32.0 13.3 ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1162 13.0 10.3 ATTICA 2086 81.0 42.S COLLINS 1133 14.9 11.4 GROVELAND 976 14.3 10.2 GROVELAND FEH HED 300 12.7 10.0 GROVELAND FEH HIN lUI 9.9 7.9 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 13.9 12.S LAKEVIEW RECEP 178 IS.6 13.8 LAKEVIEW ASAT 74 11.0 9.5 LIVINGSTON 788 14.2 14.2 ORLEANS 1293 16.7 13.0 WENDE 788 100.3 S9.9 WYOHING 1640 14.0 10.0 TOTAL 11004 33.0 13.9 AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1711 as.3 4S.3 BUTLER SHOCK 177 13.8 12.2 BUTLER ASACTC 123 10.8 11.0 CAHP GEORGETOWN 2S9 7.1 6.1 CAHP PHARSALIA 207 8.9 8.7 CAYUGA 794 13.1 8.9 ELHIRA 176S 66.7 36.4 HONTEREY SHOCK 167 13.0 11.8 ROCHESTER 199 S.6 4.3 SOUTHPORT 686 60.1 16.2 TOTAL 6088 S3.4 16.4 NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 891 14.1 11.7 BAYVIEW 16S 11.1 8.4 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 87 7.S 6.S: EDGECOHBE 4S8 6.7 S.8 FULTON 444 6.9 5.1 LINCOLN 398 7.2 5.6 PARKSIDE 103 7.0 S.l QUEENSBORO 863 6.8 S.3 TOTAL 3409 9.0 6.6 GRAND TOTAL 57S09 36.7 14.1 '.

-44-

Section Three

PROGRAM RELEVANT CHARACTERISTICS

Reading Proficiency

Among inmates undercustody on January 3, 1992,11 only 22.5% (13,061) have a verified high school diploma (see Table 17). Six thousand are Spanish dominant and would therefore probably benefit from Spanish language programs where these are operational. The balance of cases, excluding 3,513 for whom test data are missing, are analyzed in Table 17B below.

Table 17B shows that there were 35,448 persons undercustody who did not possess a high school diploma. Of that number 23.2 % (8,220) were reading below the fifth grade level. This essentially means that they were functionally illiterate. An additional 10,202 (28.8%) were reading at less than the eighth grade level, a level necessary to pass the examination for a high school equivalency degree (G.B.D.). Thus, more than half (52.0%) of the inmates without a high school diploma needed educational services simply to help them read at the level necessary to earn a General Education Diploma.

There is relatively little variation across the respective .clusters in the percent of inmates who read at 7th grade or below (see Figure 17A).

Figure 17A Reading level: 7th Grade or Below (English language Dominant)

50

40 p e, v c e ~ 20

10

1 2 3 4 15 II 7 II II 10 Total Onl Wat ell Sui SS OH OM All AlJb NYC Pop Cluat.r

llOata on reading proficiency, math proficiency, and academic degree &tlitus were taken from 8 data file compiled on January 3. The ~umber of cases on these educational tables (N =58,025) is slightly higher than that for earlier tables (e.g. 57,907 in Table I).

1- _ -45-

TABLE 17. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY ENGLISH READING LEVEL AND DIPLOHA STATUS; IJNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER ENGLISH READING LEVEL TOTAL AND FACILITY o - 4TH 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 HISSING TEST VERIFIED HS SPANISH GRADE DATA DIPLOHA OR DOHINANT DEGREE ONEIDA HUB (1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 26 46 67 2 34 17 192 HARCY 135 301 576 48 264 110 1434 HID-STATE 250 22B 397 28 284 203 1390 HOHAWK 239 183 324 76 204 178 1204 ONIEDA 84 153 347 34 389 66 1073 SUMMIT SHOCK HALE 15 14 19 0 22 6 76 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 13 27 33 0 10 4 87 TOTAL 762 952 1763 188 1207 584 5456 14.0% 17.4% 32.3% 3.4% 22.1% 10.7% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 121 129 296 38 135 73 792 OGDENSBURG 130 157 271 27 124 90 799 WATERTOWN 110 163 224 20 192 111 820 ,'OTAL 361 449 791 85 451 274 2411 15.0% 18.6% 32.8% 3.5% 18.7% 11.4% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 90 116 220 17 103 68 614 ALTONA 110 137 245 15 141 83 731 BARE HILL 277 247 440 52 298 235 1549 CAMP GABRIELS 62 50 116 11 42 24 305 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 14 31 5& 0 28 10 141 CLINTON 422 453 712 223 707 266 2783 FRANKLIN 246 298 498 54 269 177 1542 LYON HOUNTAIN 27 28 62 4 32 8 161 TOTAL 1248 1360 2351 376 1620 871 7826 15.9% 17.4% 30.0% 4.8% 20.7% 11.1% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 99 150 226 55 492 118 1140 SHAWANGUNK 45 73 89 62 219 53 541 SULLIVAN 132 129 148 86 173 57 725 ULSTER 126 121 326 119 13 101 806 WALLKILL 55 69 141 21 199 66 551 WOODBOURNE 88 140 187 49 283 146 893 TOTAL 545 662 1117 392 1379 541 4656 11.7% 14.6% 24.0% 8.4% 29.6% 11.6% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 120 154 251 75 69 60 729 SING SING 342 376 520 124 603 305 2272 TACONIC 79 93 160 5 27 37 401 TOTAL 541 625 931 204 699 402 3402 15.9% 18.4% 27.4Y. 6.0Y. 20.5% 11.8% 100.0Y. GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEP'lALE 50 53 96 1 1 14 215 DOWNSTATE 289 296 463 228 240 136 1652 FISHKILL 225 313 413 52 486 292 1783 GREEN HAVEN 255 272 393 139 703 304 2066 HID-ORANGE 79 123 182 19 187 83 673 OTISVILLE 65 '9l 128 15 245 81 625 TOTAL 963 1148 1675 454 1864 910 7014 13.7% 16.4% 23.9% 6.5% 26.6% 13.0% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 46 39 84 10 62 39 280 COXSACKIE 160 216 314 26 215 30 961 GREAT HEADDW 188 255 469 80 394 156 1542 GREENE 215 346 496 43 297 137 1534 HUDSON 57 69 143 16 137 29 451 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 4 8 27 6 44 0 89 HORIAH SHOCK 9 30 87 1 10 10 147 HT HCGREGOR 69 100 165 21 134 68 557 WASHINGTON 147 201 260 40 296 137 1081 TOTAL 895 1264 2045 243 1589 606 6642 13.5% 19.0% 30.8% 3.n 23.9% 9.1% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 259 324 427 14 54 97 1175 ATTICA 294 356 521 225 509 185 2090 CAHP GROVELAND FEH 33 38 37 3 3 2 116 COLLINS 134 187 292 82 309 124 1128 GROVELAND 105 129 330 69 277 69 979 GROVELAND FEHALE 47 78 105 7 35 23 295 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 54 96 186 27 42 72 477 LAKEVIEW RECEP 33 32 67 18 10 24 184 LAKEVIEW ASAT 5, 17 31 13 4 7 77 LIVINGSTON 141 141 251 32 110 96 771 ORLEANS 181 207 474 82 195 151 1290 ROCHESTER 9 23 51 44 63 8 198 WENDE 107 114 187 115 219 43 785 WYOMING 231 302 546 128 283 150 1640 TOTAL 1633 2044 3505 859 2113 1051 11205 14.6% 18.2% 31.3% 7.7% 18.9% 9.4% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 233 260 395 158 513 148 1707 BUTLER SHOCK 1.5 46 99 8 7 22 197 BUTLER ASACTC 17 33 46 8 26 17 147 CAHP GEORGETOWN 44 63 121 ':I 14 9 260 CAMP PHARSALIA 31 35 83 8 27 20 204 CAYUGA 113 165 289 20 164 38 789 ELHIRA 254 288 543 304 281 90 1760 HONTEREY SHOCK 23 23 84 1 16 14 161 SOUTHPORT 78 112 210 74 148 51 673 TOTAL 808 1025 1870 590 1196 409 5898 13.7% 17.4% 31.7% 10.0% 20.3% 6.9% 100.0% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 164 174 214 41 200 101 894 BAYVIEW 16 44 75 2 19 , 165 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 17 29 37 1 9 14 107 EDGECOHBE 49 77 151 13 138 56 4" fULTON 60 70 121 21 119 460 LINCOLN 59 79 108 12 124 iiI 1\35 PARKS IDE 14 26 33 0 10 "6 39 -QUEENSBORO 85 154 259 32 324 4' TOTAL 464 655 978 122 943 !ISS 351 13.2% 18.6% 27.8% 5.5% 26.8% 10.1% 100.0%'''! GRAND TOTAL 8220 10202 17026 3513 13061 6003 58025 14.2% 17.6% 29.3% 6.1% 22.5% 10.3% 100.0% ". -46- TABLE 17B. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY ENGLISH READING LEVEL (EXCLUDING H.S. DIPLOHA OR HORE, HISSING DATA, AND SPANISH DOHINANT) UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER ENGLISH READING LEVEL AND HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOHA TOTAL AND FACILITY STATUS o - 4TH GRADE 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 ONEIDA HUB 11) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 26 4(, 67 139 HARCY '135 301 576 1012 HID-STATE 250 228 397 875 HOHAWK 239 183 324 746 ONIEDA 84 153 347 584 SUHMIT SHOCK HALE 15 14 19 48 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 13 27 33 73 TOTAL 762 952 1763 3477 21.9% 27.4% 50.7Y. 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 121 129 296 546 OGDENSBURG 130 157 271 558 WATERTOWN 110 163 224 497 TOTAL 361 449 791 1601 22.5% 28.0% 49.4% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 90 11(, 220 426 ALTONA 110 137 245 492 BARE HILL 277 247 440 964 CAMP GABRIELS 62 50 116 228 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 14 31 58 103 CLINTON 422 453 712 1567 FRANKLIN 246 298 498 1042 LYON HOUNTAIN 27 28 62 117 TOTAL 1248 1360 2351 4959 25.2% 27.4% 47.4)( 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 99 150 226 475 SHAWANGUNK 45 73 89 207 SULLIVAN 132 129 148 409 ULSTER 12& 121 32& 573 WALLKILL 55 69 141 265 WOODBOURNE 88 140 187 415 TOTAL 545 682 1117 2344 23.3% 29.1)( 47.7% 100.0)( SING SING IIUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 120 154 251 525 SING SING 342 378 520 1240 TACONIC 79 "3 1&0 332 TOTAL 541 (,25 931 2097 25.8% 29.8% 44.4% 100.0)( GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEMALE 50 53 91. 199 DOWNSTATE 289 296 4&3 1048 FISHKILL 225 313 413 951 GREEN HAVEN 255 272 393 920 HID-ORANGE 79 123 182 384 OTISVILLE 65 91 128 284 TOTAL 963 1148 1675 3786 25.4% 30.3% 44.2)( 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 46 39 84 169 CO)(SACKIE 160 216 314 690 GREAT HEADOW 188 255 469 912 GREENE 215 346 496 1057 HUDSON 57 69 143 269 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 4 8 27 39 HORIAH SHOCK 9 30 87 126 I'IT HCGREGOR 69 100 165 334 WASHINGTON 147 201 260 608 TOTAL 895 1264 2045 4204 21.3)( 30.1)( 48.6)( 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEMALE 259 324 427 1010 ATTICA 294 356 521 1171 CAHP GROVELAND FEH 33 38 37 108 COLLINS 134 187 292 613 GROVELAND 105 129 330 564 GROVELAND FEHALE 47 78 105 230 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 54 96 186 336 LAKEVIEW RECEP 33 32 67 132 LAKEVIEW ASAT 5 17 31 53 LIVINGSTON 141 141 251 533 ORLEANS 181 207 474 8&2 ROCHESTER 9 23 51 83 WENDE 107 114 187 408 WYOMING 231 302 546 1079 TOTAL 1633 2044 3505 7182 22.7Y. 28.5% 48.8Y. 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 233 260 395 888 BUTLER SHOCK 15 46 99 160 BUTLER ASACTC 17 33 46 96 CAMP GEORGETOWN 44 63 121 228 CAMP PHARSALIA 31 35 83 149 CAYUGA 113 165 289 567 ELI'IIRA 254 288 543 1085 MONTEREY SHOCK 23 23 84 130 SOUTHPORT 78 112 210 400 TOTAL 808 1025 1870 3703 21.8% 27.7% 50.5)( 100.0% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 164 174 214 552 IIAYVIEW 16 44 75 135 IIAYVIEW WORK RELEASE .17 29 57 83 EDGECOHIIE It, 77 151 257 fULTON 6O 70 121 2ii1 LINCOLN 59 79 108 246 PARKSIDE 14 26 33 7~, QUEENSBORO 85 154 259 49·1, TOTAL 464 653 978 209!ii 22.1% 31.2% 46.7Y. 100.f};! GRAND TOTAL 8220 10202 17026 354(,8 23.2% 28.8)( its.0)( 1110. (/% -47-

Table 17C shows the reading level for the 6,003 Spanish dominant inmates under custody on January 3, 1992 (see also Figure 17B). Eleven hundred thirty-seven inmates (18.9%) have verified diplomas from high school or degrees bf~yond the high school diploma level. Of the remaining inmatfJS, only 775 can read at eighth gr.ade or above. An eighth grade reading level is necessary to pass the G.E.D. tests.

About 15.5% of the 6003 Spanish language dominant inmates have unknown reading skills. These inmates as well as all those without the ability to defend themselves in English, are regarded by the DOCS as requiring bilingual education (program entitled "Teachers English as a Foreign Language".) and other educational services.

Figure 178 Reading Level: 7th Grade or Below (Spanish Language Dominant)

70

60

P 50 e r 40 c e n 30 t 20

10

1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat 'CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -48-

TABLE 17C. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY SPANISH READING LEVEL (SPANISH LANGUAGE DOHINANT INHATES ONLY) UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER SPANISH READING lEVEL AND HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA STATUS TOTAL AND FACILITY 0 - 4TH GRADE 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 HISSING TEST VERIFIED HS DATA DIPLOHA OR DEGREE ONEIDA HUB (1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 2 6 4 2 3 17 MARCY 31 33 17 17 12 110 HID-STATE 66 70 26 15 26 203 MOHAWK 73 42 18 34 11 178 ONIEDA 17 16 11 6 16 66 SUMMIT SHOCK HALE 0 2 3 1 0 6 SUMMIT SHOCK FE" 1 2 a a 1 4 TOTAL 190 171 79 75 69 584 32.5% 29.3% 13.5% 12.8% 11.8% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) " GOUVERNEUR 24 25 7 11 6 73 OGDENSBURG 32 16 12 22 8 90 WATERTOWN 32 12 5 31 31 111 TOTAL 88 53 24 64 45 274 32.1% 19.3% 8.8% 23.4% 16.4% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 28 13 6 14 7 68 ALTONA 30 23 12 7 11 83 BARE HILL 96 58 22 18 41 235 CAMP GABRIELS 6 2 2 13 1 24 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 4 4 2 0 0 10 CLINTON 90 61 44 20 51 266 FRANKLIN 67 41 25 28 16 177 LYON HOUNTAIN 2 2 0 4 0 8 TOTAL 323 204 113 104 127 871 37.1% 23.4% 13.0% 11.9% 14.6% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 29 22 9 1'9 39 118 SHAWANGUNK 14 9 5 7 18 53 SULLIVAN 24 13 1 7 12 57 ULSTER 3 1 1 95 1 101 WALLKILL 15 18 8 1 24 66 WOODBOURNE 31 28 21 8 58 146 TOTAL 116 91 45 137 152 541 21.4% 16.8% 8.3% 2li.3% 28.1% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 14 9 26 1 10 60 SING SING 70 74 44 30 87 305 TACONIC 11 10 8 0 8 37 TOTAL 95 93 78 31 105 402 23.6% 23.1% 19.4% 7.7% 26.1% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEHALE 6 I> 2 0 0 14 DOWNSTATE 51 37 11 32 5 136 FISHKILL 81 66 41 9 95 292 GREEN HAVEN 61 63 41 14 125 304 HID-ORANGE 27 17 15 9 15 83 OTISVILLE 30 18 4 9 20 81 TOTAL 256 207 114 73 21>0 910 28.1% 22.7% 12.5% 8.0% 28.6% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAMP HCGREGOR 15 8 6 10 0 39 COXSACKIE 7 7 8 4 4 30 GREAT HEADOW 54 37 34 4 27 156 GREENE 49 30 18 15 25 137 HUDSON ') 5 4 3 8 29 HORIAH SHOCK 0 0 8 2 0 10 HT HCGREGOR 21 22 b 10 9 68 WASHINGTON 39 35 23 12 26 137 TOTAL 194 144 107 60 101 606 32.0% 23.8% 17.7% 9.9% 16.7% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION I'EHALE 29 29 34 0 5 97 ATTICA 59 55 16 28 27 185 CAHP GROVELAND FEH 1 1 0 0 0 2 COLLINS 30 24 13 32 25 124 GROVELAND 21 21 14 8 5 69 GROVELAND FEHALE 5 4 5 0 9 23 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 16 17 2. 32 5 72 LAKEVIEW RECEP 7 3 0 14 0 24 LAKEVIEW ASAT 1 0 1 5 0 7 LIVINGSTON 27 22 13 25 9 96 ORLEANS 35 25 7 76 8 151 ROCHESTER 5 1 1 0 1 8 WENDE 16 8 6 4 9 43 WYOMING 47 25 10 49 19 150 TOTAL 299 235 122 273 122 1051 28.4% 22.4% 11.6% 26.0% AUBURN HUB (9) 11.6% 100.0% AUBURN 49 29 13 14 43 148 BUTLER SHOCK 8 3 4 7 0 22 BUTLER ASACTC 3 4 5 4 1 17 CAMP GEORGETOWN 1 3 0 5 0 9 CAMP PHARSALIA 2 1 2 15 0 20 CAYUGA 11 Ii 8 8 b 38 ELMIRA 36 17 13 14 10 90 MONTEREY SHOCK 4 6 3 0 1 14 SOUTHPORT 14 13 8 5 11 51 TOTAL 128 81 51> 72 72 409 31.3% 19.8% 13.7% 17.6% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) 17.6% 100.0% ARTHURKILL 36 21 7 16 21 101 BAYVIEW 2 3 1 1 2 9 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE (, 3 2 0 3 14 EDGECOHBE 16 12 6 2 20 li6 FULTON 19 22 6 11 11 69 LINCOLfi 12 16 8 4 11 51 PARKSIDE 2 1 0 0 3 I> QUEENSBORO 11 13 7 S 13 49 TOJAL 104 91 37 39 84 355 29.3% 25.6% 10.4% 11.0% 23.7% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 1793 1370 775 928 1137 6003 29.9% 22.8% 12.9% 15.5% 18.9% 100.0% -49-

Math Proficiency

Large numbers of inmates lack mathematical literacy at the 8th grade level (see Table 18 and Figure 18A). Some 6,152 inmates test at less than 5th grade. Another 13,558 are capable at between the 5th and 7th grade levels in mathematics. Both groups need mathematical training in order to earn a General Education Diploma. The nearly 12,000 inmates for whom data are missing represent a group that potentially also needs mathematics training.

Figure 18A Math Proficiency: 7th Grade or BeloW (English Language Dominant)

50

40 p e 30 r c e n 20 t

10

o 1 234 5 6 7 8 9 ': 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster '. -50- TABLE 18 CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HATH GRADE LEVEL AND DIPLOHA STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER HATH GRADE LEVEL TOTAL AND FACILITY o - 4TH 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 HISSING TEST VERIFIED HS SPANISH GRADE DATA DIPLOHA OR DOHINANT DEGREE

ONEIDA HUB (1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 21 78 31 11 34 17 192 HARCY 127 416 214 303 264 110 1434 HID-STATE 155 363 179 206 284 203 1390 HOHAWK 154 294 147 227 204 178 1204 ONIEDA 71 226 100 221 389 66 1073 SUHMIT SHOCK HALE 7 25 13 3 22 6 76 SUMMIT SHOCK FEH 11 34 26 2 10 4 87 TOTAL 546 1436 710 973 1207 584 5456 10.0Y. 26.3)( 13.0Y. 17.8Y. 22.1Y. 10.7% 100.0Y. WATERTOWN Hlm (2) GOUVERNEUR 78 228 175 103 135 73 792 OGDENSBURG 88 250 134 113 124 90 799 WATERTOWN 81 220 95 121 192 111 820 TOTAL 247 698 4(14 337 451 274 2411 10.2Y. 29.0Y. 16.8Y. 14.0Y. 18.7% 11.4Y. 100.0Y. CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 88 170 III 74 103 68 614 ALTONA 31 72 32 372 141 83 731 BARE HILL 202 397 185 232 298 235 1549 CAMP GABRIELS 37 102 54 46 42 24 305 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 20 (t9 29 5 28 10 141 CLINTON 336 578 245 651 707 266 2783 FRANKLIN 196 448 238 214 269 177 1542 LYON MOUNTAIN 19 54 32 16 32 8 161 TOTAL 929 1870 926 1610 1620 871 7826 11.9Y. 23.9Y. 11.8)( 20.6Y. 20.7Y. 11.1Y. 100.0Y. SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 80 193 101 1,56 492 118 1140 SHAWANGUNK 36 87 40 106 219 !J3 541 SULLIVAN 112 170 61 152 173 57 725 ULSTER 64 262 172 194 13 101 806 WALLKILL 36 104 71 75 199 66 551 WOODBOURNE 61 192 76 135 283 146 893 TOTAL 389 1008 521 818 1379 541 4656 8.4Y. 21. loY. 11.2Y. 17.6Y. 29.6Y. 11.6Y. 100.0Y. SING SING HUB 15) BEDFORD HILLS 114 219 110 157 69 60 729 SING SING 235 470 182 477 603 305 2272 TACONIC 77 143 94 23 27 37 401 TOTAL 426 832 386 lo5? 699 402 3402 12.5)( 24.5Y. 11.3Y. 19.3Y. 20.5Y. 11.8Y. 100.0Y. GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEMALE 64 81 52 3 1 14 215 DOWNSTATE 245 451 190 390 240 136 1652 FISHKILL 153 355 191 304 488 292 1783 GREEN HAVEN 186 319 169 385 703 304 2066 MID-ORANGE 61 165 97 80 187 83 673 OTISVILLE 40 102 72 85 245 81 625 TOTAL 749 1473 771 1247 1864 910 7014 10.7Y. 21.0y' 11.0y' 17.8Y. 26.6Y. 13.0Y. 100.0Y. GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 35 64 29 51 62 39 280 COXSACKIE 107 237 137 235 215 30 961 GREAT MEADOW 180 312 224 276 394 156 1542 GREENE 174 437 257 232 297 137 1534 HUDSON 51 101 58 75 137 29 451 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 2 20 10 13 44 0 89 MORIAH SHOCK 14 47 65 1 10 10 147 HT MCGREGOR 66 136 70 83 134 68 557 WASHINGTDN 122 251 127 148 296 137 1081 TOTAL 751 1605 977 1114 1589 606 6642 11.3% 24.2Y. 14.7Y. 16.8% 23.9% 9.1Y. 100.0Y. ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEMALE 299 437 237 51 54 97 1175 ATTICA 202 350 181 663 509 185 2090 CAMP GROVELAND FEH 33 54 17 7 3 2 116 COLLINS 93 230 124 248 309 124 1128 GROVELAND 86 188 122 237 277 69 979 GROVELAND FEMALE 49 119 43 26 35 23 295 LAKEVIEW 5HOCK 38 127 87 III 42 72 477 LAKEVIEW RECEP 20 52 38 40 10 24 184 LAKEVIEW ASAT 6 26 17 17 4 7 77 LIVINGSTON 72 197 96 200 110 96 771 ORLEANS 95 255 172 422 195 151 1290 ROCHESTER 8 20 11 88 63 8 198 WENDE 58 154 57 254 219 43 785 WYOMING 145 344 197 521 283 150 1640 TOTAL 1204 2553 1399 2885 2113 1051 11205 10.7Y. 22.8Y. 12.5% 2S.7Y. 18.9Y. 9.4Y. 100.bY. AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 169 290 136 451 513 148 1707 BUTLER SHOCK 14 72 68 14 7 22 197 BUTLER ASACTC 17 28 21 38 26 17 147 CAMP GEORGETOWN 2S 107 65 40 14 9 260 C.~HP PHARSALIA 20 58 35 44 27 20 204 CAYUGA 76 199 159 153 164 38 789 ELMIRA 138 251 98 902 281 90 1760 MONTEREY SHOCK 15 35 71 10 16 14 161 SOUTHPORT 69 152 75 178 148 51 673 TOTAL 5f~3 1192 728 1830 1196 409 5898 9.2% 20.2Y. 12.3)( 31.0% 20.3Y. 6.9% 100.0Y. NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 122 237 107 127 200 101 894 BAYVIEW OJ 47 40 41 19 9 165 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 18 33 22 11 9 14 107 EDGECOHBE 32 III 80 47 138 56 4611 FULTON 53 104 65 50 119 69 460 LINCOLN 36 124 49 49 124 51 '433 PARKSIDE 14 30 20 9 10 6 89 QUEENSBORO 85 205 135 105 324 49 903 TOTAL 369 891 518 439 943 355 3515 1O.5Y. 25.3% 14.7Y. 12.5% 26.8% 10.1% 100.0% GR~ND TOTAL 6153 13558 7340 11910 13061 6003 58025 10.6Y. 23.4Y. 12.6)( 20.5Y. 22.5Y. 1O.3Y. 100.0% -51~

TABLE 18B. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HATH PRDFICIENCY LEVEL (EXCLUDING H.S. DIPLOHA OR HORE, HISSING DATA, AND SPANISH DOHINANT) UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER HATH GRADE LEVEL AND HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA STATUS TDTAL AND FACILITY o - 4TH GRADE 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 ONEIDA HUB (11 JOHNSTDWN ASACTC 21 78 31 130 HARCY 127 416 214 757 HID-STATE 155 363 179 697 HOHAWK 154 294 147 595 ONIEDA 71 226 100 397 SUMMIT SHOCK HALE 7 25 13 45 SUMHIT SH.OCK FEM 11 34 26 71 TOTAL 546 1436 710 2692 20.3X 53.aX 26.4X 100.0X WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 78 .' 228 175 481 OGDENSBURG 88 250 134 472 WATERTOWN 81 220 95 396 TOTAL 247 698 404 1349 18.3X 51.n 29.9X 100.0X CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 88 170 111 369 ALTONA 31 72 32 135 BARE HILL 202 397 185 784 CAHP GABRIELS 37 102 54 193 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC , 20 49 29 98 CLINTON 336 578 245 1159 FRANKLIN 196 448 238 882 LYON MOUNTAIN 19 54 32 105 TOTAL 929 1870 926 3725 24.9X 50.2X 24.9X 100.0X SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 80 193 101 374 SHAWANGUNK 36 87 40 163 SULLIVAN 112 170 61 343 ULSTER 64 2&2 172 498 WALLKILL 36 104 71 211 WOODBOURNE 61 192 76 329 TOTAL 389 1008 521 1918 20.3X 52.6X 27.2X 100.0X SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 114 219 110 443 SING SING 235 470 182 887 TACONIC 77 143 94 314 TOTAL 426 832 386 1644 25.9X 50.6X 23.5X 100.0X GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEMALE 64 III 52 197 DOWNSTATE 245 451 190 886 FISHKILL 153 355 191 699 GREEN HAVEN 186 319 169 674 HID-ORANGE l.1 165 97 323 OTISVILLE 40 102 72 214 TOTAL 749 1473 771 2993 25.0X 49.2X 25.8r. 100.0r. GREAT MEADOW HUB (7) CAHP MCGREGOR 35 64 29 1211 COXSACKIE 107 237 137 1t81 GREAT HEADOW 180 312 224 716 GREENE 174 437 257 868 HUOSON 51 101 58 210 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 2 20 10 32 MORIAH SHOCK 14 47 65 126 MT MCGREGOR 66 136 70 212 WASHINGTON 122 251 127 500 TOTAL 7.51 1605 977 3333 22.5X 1t8.2;( 29.3X 100.0X ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEMALE 299 437 237 973 ATTICA 202 350 181 733 CAMP GROVELAND FEM 33 54 17 104 COLLINS 93 230 124 447 GROVELAND 86 188 122 396 GROVELAND FEMALE 1t9 119 43 211 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 38 127 87 252 LAKEVIEW RECEP 20 52 311 110 LAKEVIEW ASAT 6 26 17 49 LIVINGSTON 72 i97 96 365 ORLEANS 'IS 255 172 522 ROCHESTER II 20 11 39 WENDE 58 154 57 269 WYOMING 145 344 197 686 TOTAL 1204 255::: 1399 5156 23.4;( 49.5X 27.1X 100.0X AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 169 290 136 595 BUTLER SHOCK 14 72 68 154 BUTLER ASACTC 17 28 21 66 CAHP GEORGETOWN 25 107 65 197 CAMP PHARSALIA 20 58 35 113 CAYUGA 76 199 159 434 ELHIRA 138 251 98 487 MONTEREY SHOCK 15 35 71 121 SOUTHPORT 69 152 75 296 TOTAL 543 1192 728 2463 22.0X 48.4X 29.6X lOO.OX NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKlLL 122 237 107 466 BAYVIEW 9 1t7 40 96 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 18 33 22 73 EDGECOH8E 32 III 80 223 FULTON 53 104 65 222 LINCOLN 36 124 49 209 PARKSIIlE 14 30 20 64 QUEENSBORO 85 205 135 425 TOTAL 369 891 518 1778 20.11;( 50.1;( 29.1;( 100.0X GRAND TOTAL 6153 13558 7340 27051 22.n 50.1X 27.1;( 100.0X -52-

Table 18C shows mathematics performance levels of the 6,003 Spanish language dominant inmates. Excluding the 1,137 inmates with verified high school diplomas and the 233 able to do mathematics at the 8th grade or higher level, 2,586 of these inmates have a need for mathematics literacy training (see also Figure 18B).

A large number of Spanish language dominant inmates (2,047) have unknown mathematics deficiencies in the January 1992 cohort. The Department recognizes the seriousness of the missing data problem for educational services planning and has been whittling down the number of missing cases over the intervening period. For instance, on August 1, 1992, the number of Spanish dominant inmates was 6,317, 314 more than on January 3, 1992. However, data on mathematics achievement was missing for only 1,841 as against 2,047 of 6,003 persons on January 3, 1992.

Figure 188 Math Proficiency: 7th Grade or Below (Spanish Language Dominant) \.

70

60

P 50 e r 40 c ~ 30 t 20

10

1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat 011 Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster -53-

TABLE ISC. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY HATH PROFICIENCY LEVEL, SPANISH DOHINANT LANGUAGE INHATES ONLY UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 cLuSTER HATH GRADE LEVEL AND HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOHA STATUS TOTAL AND FACILITY o - 4TH GRADE 5TH - 7TH 8TH - 12 HISSING TEST VERIFIED HS DATA DIPLOMA OR DEGREE

ONEIDA HUB (l) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 6 3 3 2 3 17 HARCY 41 23 3 31 12 110 MID-STATE 64 57 10 46 26 203 MOHAWK 67 33 4 63 11 178 ONIEDA 27 7 3 13 11> 66 SUMHIT SHOCK HALE 0 4 1 1 0 6 SUMHIT SHOCK FEH 2 1 0 0 1 4 TOTAL 207 128 24 156 69 584 35.4% 21.9% 4.1% 26.7% 11.8% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 16 18 5 28 6 73 OGDENSBURG 29 15 4 34 8 90 WATERTOWN 18 8 2 52 31 111 TOTAL 63 41 11 114 45 274 23.0% 15.0% 4.0% 41.6% 16.4% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 27 10 2 22 7 68 ALTONA 28 14 3 27 11 83 BARE HILL 80 26 9 79 41 235 CAHP GABRIELS 6 3 0 14 1 24 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 1 1 1 7 0 10 CLINTON 80 41 15 79 51 266 FRANKLIN 84 35 6 36 16 117 LYON HOUNTAIN 3 0 0 5 0 8 TOTAL 309 130 36 269 127 871 35.5% 14.9% 4.1% 30.9% 14.6% 100.0% SUl.LIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 31 10 5 33 39 118 SliAWANGUNK 14 7 2 12 18 53 SULLIVAN 16 5 1 23 12 57 ULSTER 2 1 0 97 1 101 WALLKILL 8 6 2 26 24 66 WOODBOURNE 34 22 6 26 58 146 TOTAL 105 51 16 217 152 541 19.4% 9.4% 3.0% 40.1% 28.1% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 18 8 8 16 10 60 SING SING 95 40 11 72 87 305 TACONIC 8 5 3 13 8 37 TOTAL 121 53 22 101 105 402 30.1% 13.2% 5.5% 25.1% 26.1% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEHALE 11 3 0 0 0 14 DOWNSTATE 58 17 2 54 5 136 FISHKILL 77 28 4 88 95 2'12 GREEN HAVEN 53 38 14 74 125 304 HID-ORANGE 33 14 8 13 15 83 OTISVILLE 24 9 1 27 20 81 TOTAL 256 109 29 256 260 910 28.1% 12.0% 3.2% 28.1% 28.6% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 19 5 2 13 0 39 COXSACKIE 9 7 4 6 4 30 GREAT HEADOW 48 30 12 39 27 156 GREENE 41 27 5 39 25 137 HUDSON 5 1 3 12 8 29 HORIAH SHOCK 0 6 2 2 0 10 HT HCGREGOR 19 5 2 33 9 68 14,1,:.;, LNGTON 48 25 5 31 28 137 T01AL 189 106 35 175 101 606 31.2% 17.5% 5.8% 2".9% 16.7% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 54 24 ':I 5 5 97 ATTICA 64 21 0 73 27 185 CAHP GROVELAND FE" 2 0 0 0 0 2 COLLINS 14 14 6 65 25 124 GROVELAND 28 13 3 20 5 69 GROVELAND FEHALE 8 4 1 1 ':I 23 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 20 8 2 37 5 72 LAKEVIEW RECEP 7 1 0 16 0 24 LAKEVIEW ASAT 0 1 0 6 0 7 LIVINGSTON 30 15 1 41 9 96 ORLEANS 29 10 3 101 8 151 ROCHESTER 2 1 1 3 1 8 WENDE 6 5 0 23 9 43 WYOHING 21 11 3 96 19 150 TOTAL 285 128 29 487 122 1051 27.1% 12.2% 2.8% 46.3% 11.6% 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 47 10 5 43 43 148 BUTLER SHOCK 7 4 2 9 0 22 BUTLER ASACTC 3 5 2 6 1 17 CAHP GEORGETOWN 1 2 0 6 0 9 CAHP PHARSALIA 2 0 1 17 0 20 CAYUGA 9 7 3 13 6 38 ELMIRA 13 9 4 54 10 90 MONTEREY SHOCK 3 7 3 0 1 14 SOUTHPORT 12 9 0 19 11 51 TOTAL 97 53 20 167 72 409 23.7% 13.0% 4.9% 40.8% 17.6% ' 100.0% NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 27 8 5 40 21 101 BAYVIEW 2 0 1 4 2 , BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE , 1 1 3 3 14 EDGECOMBE 16 ':I 1 10 FULTON 20 1i6 18 15 2 23 11 6' LINCOLN 14 14 0 12 11 51 PARKSIDE 2 0 0 1 !5 6 Q~X;;:NSBORO 12 11 1 12 13 49 TOTAL 97 58 11 105 84 355 - 27.3% 16.3% 3.1% 29.6% 23.7% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 1729 857 233 2047 1157 6003 28.8% 14.3% 3.9% 34.1% 18.9% 100.0% -54-

Academic Degree Status

Table 19 presents data on the educational attainment of persons under custody on January 1, 1992. The data reveal that 39,042 (67.3%), more than two-thirds of the 58,025 inmates under custody at that time, lacked a high school diploma or equivalent. The remaining 18,983 claimed at least a high school degree as of that date.

The proportion of unverified claims of a high school diploma or higher suggests that 39,042 is a conservative estimate of persons without at least a high school degree (see Table 19B). For instance, there were 4,553 inmates (7.8% of undercustody popUlation) who claimed a high school diploma or a G.B.D. but could not substantiate this claim.

The problem of unverified claims of a high school diploma or more varies in severity from cluster to cluster. It affects about 4 percent of inmates in cluster 1 (Watertown Hub) but over 12.3 percent in cluster 8 (Attica Hub).

Figure 1'9 High School Diploma (Verified) or \Above \

50

40

p e 30 r c e n 20 t

10

1 2 3 <4 5 e 7 e 9 10 Total Onl Wat ell Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -55- TABLE 19. CLUSTER BY EDUCATION DIPLOMA AND COLLEGE DEGREE STATUS; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATXON JAN S 1992 I CLUSTER EDUCATION DEGREE STATUS TOTAL AND FACILITY NO DEGREE H.S. DIPLOMA DR 1 YEAR ASSOCIATE BACHELOR DEGREE MASTERS DEGREE GED CERTIFICATE DEGREE DR ABOVE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE VERIFICATION VERIFICATION VERIFICATION VERIFICATION VERIFICATION VERIFICATION NOT VER VERIF NOT VER VERIF NOT VER VERIF NOT VER VERIF NOT VER VERIF NOT VER VERIF

ONEIDA HUB (1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 152 0 3 35 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 192 MARCY 1067 0 87 268 0 2 3 4 1 2 0 0 1434 MID-STATE 1014 1 64 294 0 0 1 9 0 6 0 1 1390 MOHAWK 944 0 41 208 0 1 2 6 1 0 1 0 1204 ONIEDA 616 0 50 401 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 1073 SUMMIT SHOCK MALE 53 0 1 22 0 0 .- 0 0 0 0 0 0 76 SUMMIT SHOCK FE" 47 0 28 11 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 87 TOTAL 3893 1 274 1239 0 3 8 23 3 10 1 1 5456 71.4% .0% 5.0% 22.7% .0% .1% .1% .4% .1% .2% .0% .0% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 622 0 28 134 0 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 792 OGDENSBURG 645 0 21 126 0 0 1 4 0 1 0 1 799 WATERTOWN 551 0 43 220 0 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 820 TOTAL 1818 0 92 480 0 3 4 10 1 2 0 1 2411 75.4% .0% 3.8i( 19.9i( .Oi( .1i( .2i( .4% .0% .1% .OX .0% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (31 ADIRONDACK (l86 0 18 106 0 1 0 S 0 0 0 0 614 ALTONA 540 0 38 145 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 1 731 BARE HILL 1154 2 53 332 0 1 1 5 0 1 0 0 1549 CAMP GABRIELS 254 0 8 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 305 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC 112 0 1 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 CLINTON 1782 3 232 714 0 2 4 29 1 9 3 4 2783 FRANKLIN 1184 1 71 277 0 3 0 3 1 2 0 0 1542 LYON MOUNTAIN 124 0 5 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 TOTAL 5636 6 426 1677 0 7 5 45 3 13 3 5 7826 72.0i( .1% 5.4i( 21.4% .0% .1% .1% .6% .Oi( .2i( .0% .1% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 500 1 104 365 0 15 2 90 2 46 0 15 1140 SHAWANGUNK 249 0 54 191 0 1 1 35 0 9 0 1 541 SULLIVAN 486 1 49 150 0 6 3 24 1 5 0 0 725 ULSTER 608 0 172 14 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 806 WALLKILL 286 0 42 166 0 8 0 29 0 15 0 5 551 WOODBOURNE 488 0 64 282 0 14 0 31 0 7 0 7 893 TOTAL 2617 2 485 1168 0 44 16 209 5 82 0 28 4656 56.2i( .Oi( 1O.4i( 25.1% .Oi( .9i( .3% 4.5i( .1i( 1.8i( .Oi( .6i( 100.0i( SING SING HUB (51 BEDFORD HILLS 444 0 190 55 0 4 4 14 11 6 1 0 729 SING SING 1456 4 120 576 0 19 1 54 1 33 0 8 2272 TACONIC 283 0 75 32 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 0 401 TOTAL 2183 4 385 663 1 24 10 69 13 40 2 8 3402 64.2i( .1% 11.3i( 19.5% .0% .7% .3% 2.0% .4% 1.2% .1% .2% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (61 CAMP BEACON FEMALE 147 0 63 1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 215 DOWNSTATE 1373 3 30 236 0 1 0 7 0 0 1 1 1652 FISHKILL 1085 3 108 505 0 19 4 41 0 13 0 5 1783 GREEN HAVEN 1059 2 176 710 0 3 0 62 1 45 0 8 2066 MID-ORANGE 437 0 34 178 0 1 0 14 0 8 0 1 673 OTISVILLE 335 1 20 228 1 10 2 15 0 7 1 5 625 TOTAL 4436 9 431 1858 1 34 10 139 1 73 2 20 7014 63.2% .1% 6.1i( 26.5% .0% .5% .1% 2.0i( .Oi( 1.0% .0% .3% 100,0i( GREAT MEADOW HUB (7) CAMP MCGREGOR 208 0 10 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280 COXSACKIE 697 0 45 214 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 961 GREAT MEADOII 990 0 128 390 0 3 2 19 1 6 0 3 1542 GREENE 1152 2 57 308 0 2 1 10 0 1 0 1 1534 HUDSON 284 1 20 138 0 0 1 6 0 1 0 0 451 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 37 0 8 37 0 1 0 6 0 0 0 0 89 MORIAH SHOCK 127 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 MT MCGREGOR 393 0 21 142 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 C 557 WASHINGTON 717 1 39 312 0 0 0 8 0 2 0 2 1081 TOTAL 4605 4 338 1613 0 6 4 54 1 11 0 6 6642 69.3i( .1% 5.1% 24.3% .0% .1i( .1% .8% .0% .2% .Oi( .1% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (81 ALBION FEHALE 805 7 272 53 0 3 16 2 15 1 1 0 1175 ATTICA 1340 9 194 467 0 3 4 39 5 25 2 2 2090 CAMP GROVELAND FEM 92 0 20 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 116 COLLINS 696 1 92 285 0 4 3 34 2 10 0 1 1128 GROVELAND 582 0 103 240 1 12 5 21 5 8 1 1 979 GROVELAND FEMALE 195 U 5& 41 0 0 a 2 0 1 0 0 295 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 395 1 32 47 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 477 LAKEVIEW RECEP 157 0 17 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 184 LAKEVIEW ASAT 68 0 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 LIVINGSTON 585 2 63 114 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 771 ORLEANS 930 1 143 185 0 1 8 11 3 5 2 1 1290 ROCHESTER 95 0 38 56 0 1 0 5 1 2 0 0 198 WENDE 45,* 0 92 198 0 2 4 18 1 9 1 1 785 WYOMING 1170 1 156 279 0 3 8 17 1 2 2 1 1640 TOTAL 75b9 22 1283 1982 1 29 49 153 3& 64 10 7 11205 67.6% .2% 11.5% 17.7% .0% .3% .4% 1.4% .3i( .6i( .1% .1% 100.0i( AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 947 0 200 483 0 4 4 47 0 17 0 5 1707 BUTLER SHOCK 172 0 18 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 BUTLER ASACTC 107 0 10 25 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 147 CAMP GEORGETOWN 232 0 13 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2&0 CAMP PHARSALIA 160 0 17 26 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 204 CAYUGA 571 1 46 1&4 o . ~ .... -. 1 4 0 0 0 1 789 ELMIRA 1191 1 265 256 0 2 7 29 4 4 1 0 1760 MONTEREY SHOCK 133 0 11 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 SOUTHPORT 4&0 0 51 15& 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 0 673 TOTAL 3973 2 631 1148 1 7 15 85 7 22 1 6 5898 67.4i( .0% 10.7%· 19.5i( .Oi( .1% .3% 1.4% .1i( .4% .0% .1% 100.0% HEW YORK CITY HUB no) ARTHURKILL 619 It 51 198 0 3 1 14 1 4 1 2 894 BAYVIEW 92 2 45 17 0 2 3 1 2 1 0 0 165 BAYVIeW WORK RELEASE 72 0 18 12 0 0 .5 0 0 0 0 0 107 EDGECOMBE 283 0 23 144 0 3 0 8 0 1 0 2 464 FULTON 316 0 14 124 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 1 460 LINCOLN 285 0 13 122 0 3 0 6 0 1 0 3 433 PARKSIDE 64 0 10 10 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 89 QUEENSBORO. 528 1 34 315 0 4 1 15 1 3 1 0 903 TOTAL 2259 3 208 942 0 17 11 49 5 11 2 8 3515 64.3i( .1% 5.9% 26.8i( .0% .5% .3% 1.4% .1% .3% .1% .2% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 38989 53 4553 12770 4 174 132 836 75 328 21 90 58025 67.2% .1% 7.8% 22.0% .0% .3% .2i( 1.4% .1i( .6% .0% .2% 100.0% -56- TABLE 19B. CLUSTER BY EDUCATION DIPLOMA AND COLLEGE DEGREE STATUS) UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN 3 1992 CLUSTER EDUCATION DEGREE STATUS TOTAL AND FACILITY NO DEGREE H.S. 1 YEAR ASSOCIATE BACHELOR HASTERS DIPLOHA OR CERTIFICAT DEGREE DEGREE DEGREE OR GED E ABOVE ONEIDA HUB (1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 152 38 0 2 0 0 192 HARCY 1067 355 2 7 :5 0 1434 HID-STATE 1015 358 0 10 6 1 1390 HoHAWK 944 249 1 8 1 1 1204 ONIEDA 616 451 0 4 2 0 1073 SUMMIT SHOCK HALE 53 23 0 0 0 0 76 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 47 39 0 0 1 0 87 TOTAL 3894 1513 3 :!I1 13 2 5456 71.4% 27.7% .1% .6% .2% .0% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 622 162 2 6 0 0 792 OGDENSBURG 645 147 0 5 1 1 799 WATERTOWN 551 263 1 3 2 0 820 TOTAL 1818 572 3 14 3 1 2411 75.4% 23.7% .1% .6% .1% .0% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 486 124 1 3 0 0 614 ALTONA 540 183 0 5 2 1 731 BARE HILL 1156 585 1 6 1 0 1549 CAMP GABRIELS 254 51 0 0 0 0 305 CHATEAUGAY ASACTC. 112 29 0 0 0 0 141 CLINTON 1785 946 2 33 10 7 2783 FRANKLIN 1185 348 3 3 3 0 1542 LYON HOUNTAIN 124 37 0 0 0 0 161 TOTAL 5642 2103 7 50 16 8 7826 72.1% 26.9% .1% .6Y. .2% .1% 100. OJ( SULLIVAN HUll (4) EASTERN 501 469 15 92 48 15 1140 SHAWANGUNK 249 245 1 36 9 1 541 SULLIVAN 487 199 6 27 6 0 725 ULSTER 60S 186 0 10 2 0 806 WALLKILL 286 208 8 29 15 5 551 WOODBOURNE 488 346 14 31 7 7 893 TOTAL 2619 1653 44 225 87 28 4656 56.3% 35.5% .9% 4.8% 1.9% .6% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 444 245 4 18 17 1 729 SING SING 1460 696 19 55 34 8 2272 TACOHIC 283 107 2 6 2 1 401 TOTAL 2187 1048 25 79 53 10 3402 64.3% 30.8% .7% 2.3% 1.6% .3% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON FEHALE 147 64 0 4 0 0 215 DOWNSTATE 1376 266 1 7 0 2 1652 FISHKILL 1088 613 19 45 13 5 1783 GREEN HAVEN 1061 886 3 62 46 8 2066 tlID-ORANGE 437 212 1 14 8 1 673 OTISVILLE 336 248 11 17 7 6 625 TOTAL 4445 2289 35 149 74 22 7014 63.4Y. 32.6Y. .5Y. 2.1Y. 1.1Y. .3% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP tlCGREGOR 208 72 0 0 0 0 280 COXSACKIE 697 259 0 5 0 0 961 GREAT HEADOII 990 518 3 21 7 3 1542 GREENE 1154 365 2 11 1 1 1534 HUDSON 285 158 0 7 1 0 451 HUDSON WORK RELEASE 37 45 1 6 0 0 89 HORIAH SHOCK 127 20 0 0 0 0 147 tiT tlCGREGOR 393 163 0 0 1 0 557 WASHINGTON 718 351 0 8 2 2 1081 TOTAL 4609 1951 6 58 12 6 6642 69.4Y. 29.4% .1% .9Y. .2Y. .1% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEMALE 812 325 3 18 16 1 1175 ATTICA 1349 661 3 43 30 4 2090 CAHP GROVELAND FEH 92 23 0 1 0 0 116 COLLINS 697 377 4 37 12 1 1128 GROVELAND 582 343 13 26 13 2 979 GROVELAND FEtlALE 195 97 0 2 1 0 295 LAXEVIEW SHOCK 396 79 0 0 1 1 477 LAKEVIEW RECEP 157 27 0 0 0 0 184 LAKEVIEW ASAT 68 9 0 0 0 0 77 LIVINGSTDN 587 177 0 4 3 0 771 ORLEANS 931 328 1 19 8 3 1290 ROCHESTER 95 94 1 5 3 0 198 WENDE 459 290 2 22 10 2 785 WYOHING 1171 435 3 25 3 3 1640 TOTAL 7591 3265 30 202 100 17 11205 67.7% 29.1% .3% 1.8Y. .9Y. .2Y. 100.0Y. AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 947 683 4 51 17 5 1707 BUTLER SHOCK 172 25 0 0 0 0 197 BUTLER ASACTC 107 35 0 5 0 0 147 CAHP GEORGETOWN 232 27 1 0 0 0 260 CAHP PHARSALIA 160 43 0 1 0 0 204 CAYUGA 572 210 1 5 0 1 789 ELtlIRA 1192 521 2 36 8 1 1760 HONTEREY SHOCK 133 28 0 0 G 0 161 SOUTHPORT 460 207 0 2 4 0 673 TOTAL 3975 1779 8 100 29 7 5898 67.4Y. 30.2Y. .1Y. 1.7Y. .5% .1Y. 100.0Y. NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 619 249 3 15 5 3 894 BAYVIEW 94 62 2 4 3 D 165 BAYVIEW WORK RELEASE 72 30 0 5 D 0 107 EDGECOHBE 283 167 :5 8 1 2 1t64 FULTON 316 138 0 4 1 1 460 LINCOLN 285 135 3 6 1 3 433 PARKSIDE 64 20 2 2 1 0 89 QUEENSBORO 529 349 4 16 4 1 903 TOTAL 2262 1150 17 60 16 10 3515 64.4% 32.7% .5% 1.7% .5Y. .3% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 39042 17323 178 91>8 403 111 ~ 58025 67.3Y. 29.9Y. .3% 1.7% .7Y. .2% ; 100.0Y. -57-

English Language Proficiency

The vast majority (88.4 %) of inmates undercustody are English language dominant (see Table 20). There are also 5,986 inmates who are Spanish language dominant (10.3%). Spanish dominant is significant in several clusters (see also Figure 20). For instance, cluster 8 (Attica Hub) in the western part of the state has over 1000 Spanish dominant inmates. Clusters 3 (Clinton Hub) and 6 (Green Haven Hub) have almost 900 each. These inmates may require special programming (e.g. Teaching English as a Foreign Language), possibly foreign language vocational training, etc. and present special security problems because of their limited English comprehension.

Figure 20 Spanish Language Dominant (Percent of Cluster Population) 1

30

25

P 20 e r ec 15 n t 10

5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster -58-

TABLE 20. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY DOHINANT LANGUAGE; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN'l, 1992 CLUSTER SPANISH SPANISH & SPANISH I FLUENT OTHER NO TOTAL AND FAC:r.LITY ONLY LIHITED HODERATE ENGLISH LANGUAGE PREFRENCE ENGLISH ENGLISH ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 7 3 7 163 0 2 182 HARCY 64 28 21 1317 1 10 1441 HID-STATE 120 56 30 1136 6 32 1380 HOHAWK 119 30 23 1032 0 3 1207 ONIEDA 30 13 20 1014 2 4 1083 SUMHIT SHOK HALE 5 0 1 71 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 1 3 0 86 0 0 90 TOTAL 346 133 102 4819 9 51 5460 6.3% 2.4% 1.9% 88.3% .2% .9X 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2)

GOUVERNEUR 46 11 16 ~ 704 1 11 789 tlGDENSBURG 60 18 12 703 0 6 799 WATERTOWN 73 19 19 699 2 4 816 TOTAL 179 48 47 2106 3 21 2404 7.4% 2.0% 2.0% 87.6% .1% .9X 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 40 14 15 537 0 (, 612 ALTONA 37 28 16 645 0 5 731 BARE HILL 120 72 41 1298 7 7 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 17 2 4 278 0 1 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT it 2 4 117 1 1 129 CLINTON 97 101 70 2495 11 13 2787 FRANKLIN 89 53 38 1346 2 15 1543 LYON HOUNTAIII, 6 1 1 152 0 0 160 TOTAL 410 273 189 68b8 21 48 7609 5.3% 3.5% 2.4% 87.9X .3% .6% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB 14) EASTERN 77 26 19 992 7 20 1141 SHAWANGUNK 36 7 10 477 2 9 541 SULLIVAN 34 17 6 660 2 3 722 ULSTER 100 3 2 692 0 1 798 WALLKILL 37 17 13 472 3 6 550 WOODBOURNE 79 45 24 736 3 8 895 TOTAL 363 115 74 4029 17 49 4647 7.8% 2.5% 1.6% 86.n .4% 1.1% 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 37 16 11 672 0 0 736 SING SING 152 39 66 1915 14 28 2264 TACONIC 25 6 8 361 1 0 401 TOTAL 214 III 8S 2948 15 28 3401 6.3% 3.3% 2.5% 86.n .4% .8% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (61 CAHP BEACON FEH 10 3 1 205 0 0 219 DOWNSTATE 58 37 29 1512 1 5 1642 FISHKILL 126 96 68 1470 8 29 1797 GREEN HAVEN 190 65 50 1721 16 25 2067 HID-ORANGE 41 24 19 572 3 14 673 OTISVILLE 52 18 10 535 5 8 628 TOTAL 477 243 177 6015 33 81 7026 6.8% 3.5% 2.5% 85.6% .5% 1.2% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 23 5 10 243 0 0 281 COXSACKIE 17 9 7 913 2 11 959 GREAT HEADOW 74 42 36 1365 8 19 1544 GREENE 68 35 37 1374 4 20 1538 HUDSON 12 7 10 412 0 8 449 HUDSON WORK REL 0 0 0 94 0 2 96 HORIAH SHOCK 10 1 0 143 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 40 15 11 480 1 7 554 WASHINGTON 53 45 38 929 6 13 1084 TOTAL 297 159 149 5953 21 80 6659 4.5% 2.4% 2.2% 89.4% .3% 1.2% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 66 15 14 1067 0 0 1162 ATTICA 82 58 43 1878 5 20 2086 COLLINS 88 20 16 989 2 18 1133 GROVELAND 39 14 15 893 0 If 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 13 6 5 274 2 0 300 GROVELAND FE" HIN 2 0 0 116 II 0 U8 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 62 7 3 396 0 0 4b8 LAKEVIEW RECEP 29 2 1 14b 0 0 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 3 0 0 71 0 0 74 LIVINGSTON 58 2S 17 682 2 4 788 ORLEANS 128 9 14 1131 2 9 1293 WENDE 27 11 3 726 3 18 7118 WYOHING 116 19 13 1478 2 12 1640 TOTAL 713 186 144 9847 18 96 11004 6.5X 1.n 1.3% 89.5% .2% .9X 100.0% AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN M 34 31 1523 6 29 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 10 1 2 164 II 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 7 1 1 114 0 0 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 9 1 0 247 0 2 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 16 1 1 188 0 1 207 CAYUGA 2S 10 6 738 2 13 794 ELMIRA 44 28 21 1644 2 26 I 1765 MONTEREY SIIOCK 11 1 2 153 0 0 167 ROCHESTER 8 1 0 189 0 1 199 SOUTHPORT 33 12 6 620 3 12 686 TOTAL 251 90 70 5580 13 84 60811 ft.lX 1.5% 1.1% 91.7% .2% 1.4% lOO.OX NEW YORK CITY HUa (10) ARTHURKILL 50 30 18 783 4 6 891 BAYVIEW 4 4 0 157 II 0 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 7 3 2 75 0 0 87 EDGECOHBE 21 16 20 386 0 15 458 FULTON 30 17 22 368 1 6 444 LINCOLN 19 14 13 346 1 5 3911 I'ARKSIDE ft 2 1 96 0 0 105 QUEENS80RO 21 10 13 1116 0 3 863 TOTAL 156 96 89 3027 6 35 3409 4.6% 2.8% 2.6% 88.8% .2% 1.0% 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 3406 1454 1126 51192 156 573 57907 5.9X 2.5% 1.9% M.4X .3% 1.0% 100.0X '. .._-- -59-

Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test Score

Alcoholism is a serious problem in the undercustody population. To assess the extent of alcoholism the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) is administered to inmates during the reception/classification process. Of the inmates for whom test results are available 27.6% (N=13,134) are defined as alcoholic and another 16.5% (N=7,861) are possibly alcoholic (see Table 21). There does not appear to be any major variation among clusters in the percentage of persons whose results would classify them as alcoholic or possibly alcoholic (see Figure 21).

Figure 21 Percent Alcoholic Inmates

50

40

p e 30 r c e n t

10

1 2 3 " 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui S5 GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster Based on Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test -60- l TABLE 21. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY INHATE ALCOHOLISH; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER ALCOHOL ISH OF INHATES TOTAL AND FACILITY NON ALCOHOLIC SUGGESTIVE ALCOHOLIC ABUSE ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 78 3(: 58 172 HARCY 745 193 381 1319 HID-STATE 682 194 368 1244 MOHAWK 602 214 324 1140 ONIEDA 491 162 315 968 SUMHIT SHOK HALE 38 13 24 75 SUHMIT SHOCK FEH 30 30 29 89 TOTAL 2666 842 1499 5007 53.2% 16.8% 29.9% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 383 135 206 724 OGDENSBURG 389 131 228 7(,8 WATERTOWN 387 153 204 744 TOTAL 1159 419 638 2216 52.3)( 18.9)( 28.8)( 100.0)( CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 338 76 153 567 ALTONA 389 98 179 666 BARE HILL 915 183 320 1418 CAHP GABRIELS lS4 46 90 290 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 70 19 36 125 CLINTON 1313 282 586 2181 FRANKLIN 826 214 398 1438 LYON HOUNTAIN 80 26 48 154 TOTAL 4085 944 1810 6839 59.7l( 13.8)( 26.5l( 100.0)( SULLIVAN HUB (41 EASTERN 430 104 204 738 SHAWANGUNK 190 40 59 289 SULLIVAN \ 247 93 138 478 ULSTER 284 170 150 604 WALLKILL 241 52 112 405 WOODBOURNE 384 107 176 667 TOTAL 1776 566 839 3181 55.8% 17.8% 26.4% 100.0)( SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 226 153 162 541 SING SING 1100 205 399 1704 TACONIC 127 12~ 111 360 TOTAL 1453 480 672 2605 .65.8)( 18.4l( 25.S% 100.0)( GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 67 83 59 209 DOWNSTATE 784 160 233 1177 FISHKILL 860 162 370 1392 GREEN HAVEN 829 171 US 1315 HID-ORANGE 322 115 140 547 OTISVILLE 277 75 142 494 TOTAL 3139 736 1259 5134 61.1)( 14.3)( 24.5% 100.0)( GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 154 39 110 273 CO)(SACKIE 558 93 169 820 GREAT HEADOW 724 128 313 1165 GREENE 849 223 326 1398 HUDSON 220 55 116 391 HUDSON WORK REL 30 9 37 76 HORIAH SHOCK 76 31 36 143 HT HCGREGOR 250 117 170 507 WASHINGTON 631 119 212 962 TOTAL 3492 784 1459 5735 60.97- 13.7l( 25.4% 100.07- ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 396 356 299 1051 ATTICA 1178 208 398 1484 COLLINS 497 160 271 928 GROVELAND 383 145 273 801 GROVELAND FEH HED 118 90 95 273 GROVELAND FEH HIN 35 44 31 110 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 233 116 129 448 LAKEVIEW RECEP 103 34 31 168 LAKEVIEW ASAT 35 16 19 70 LIVINGSTON 351 126 240 717 ORLEANS 546 226 357 1129 WENDE 266 75 166 507 WYOMING 696 267 470 1433 TOTAL 4507 1833 2779 9119 49.47- 20.17- 30.57- 100.07- AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 635 131 323 1089 BUTLER SHOCK 93 30 47 170 BUTLER ASACTC 39 31 35 105 CAHP GEORGETOWN 127 53 68 248 CAHP PHARSALIA 89 37 68 194 CAYUGA 384 128 202 714 ELHIRA 7311 232 499 1469 HONTEREY SHOCK 113 34 40 157 ROCHESTER 53 25 .69 137 SOUTHPORT 325 70 121 516 TOTAL 2566 771 1462 4799 53.57- 16.17- 30.5% 100.07- NEW YORK CITY HUB (10) ARTHURKILL 424 112 210 746 BAYVIEW 57 47 39 143 BAYVIEW WORK REL 211 32 13 73 EDGECOHBE 262 59 117 4011 FULTON 2711 46 117 411 LINCOLN 253 53 51 357 PAilKSIDE 41 24 24 119 QUEEMSBORO 467 113 206 786 TOTAL 11110 486 717 3013 60.1% 16.17- 23.117- 100.0% GRAND TOTAL 26653 71161 13134 476411 55.97- 16.57- 27.67- 100.0%

I I ~------61-

Drug Use

More than sixty percent (62.8%) of undercustody inmates admit to drug use prior to confinement on the instant offense (see Table 22). This includes 36.8% who admit to cocaine use (including crack or crystalline cocaine) either alone or in combination with other drugs. Other dmgs used by a substantial number of inmates include substances containing cannabis (e.g. marijuana) and narcotics. Table 22 shows that many inmates are multiple drug users. The following ranking system has been used to assign multiple drug users to a category: (1) cocaine or cr'dck, (2) narcotics, (3) hallucinogens (4) cannabis (5) other drugs. 12

There appears to be variation among the clusters in the percentage of persons denying drug use, admitting cocaine use, and admitting other drug use (see Figure 22). For example, in cluster 10 (New York City Hub), 47.4% of inmates admitted prior use of cocaine in some fonn whereas only 28.0% of inmates in cluster 9 (Auburn Hub) claimed to have used it. Twenty percent (19.1 %) of persons in cluster 4 (Sullivan Hub) deny drug 'use compared to 32.3% of persons in cluster 8 (Attica Hub).

Figure 22 Self-Reported Drug Use: % Reporting Cocaine/Crack or Narcotics \

70~------~

60 ·-·--··1 0 Cocalne/lCrack 0 NarCO~------l

50 -_. _._-_._------p e r 40 c e 30 1'1 t 20

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 V 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster

12y a person uses cocaine and narcotics, cocaine usc is counted. Similarly, if marijuana and narcotics are both used, narcotics is counted. ,------62-

TABLE 22 CLUSTER AND FACILITV IV PATTERN OF 111KATE DRUG USE', OHDERCUSTODV POPULATION JAN 1, 1992 CLuSTER PATTEMN OF DRUG USE TOTAL AHl! fACILITY NO DRUGS COCAINE HALLUCINO NARCOTICS CANNABIS OTHER UHKNOWN COCAINE HALLUC IN NARCOTICS OTHER USED OR gENS ONLY ONLY ONLY SINGLE nRUGS OR CRACK AND ALL AND ALL POLVDRUG DERIVATIV DRUG USE AND OTHEII OTHER OTHER USE NOT ES ONLY AVAILABLE ONEIDA HB,CLUSTER 1 JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 51 45 0 23 17 0 1 61 2 5 1 0 1112 HARCY 401 309 II 115 11111 1 10 320 4 27 4 54 1441 'UD-STATE 434 275 4 117 179 0 15 21i5 7 17 2 77 13110 MOHAWK 371 264 1 99 163 1 II 246 6 16 1 51 1207 ONIEDA 305 211i 3 74 147 1 14 2itit 12 11 2 55 10113 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 29 10 0 3 17 0 0 Iii 0 2 1 0 77 SUHMIT SHOCk FEH 50 20 0 11 5 C 0 6 0 0 0 : 0 90 TOTAL 1621 113it 16 itit2 714 3 411 1147 31 76 111 217 5460 29.7% 20.IIX .5); 1I.1X 15.1X .1% .9X 21.0X .6X 1.4% .2% 4.0% 100.0X 1110 TERTOIIN HUB (21 GOUVERNEUR 228 161 1 7f, 1111 0 2 lli6 7 12 2 211 7119 OGDENSBURG 218 189 3 62 110 3 2 177 6 15 2 12 799 WATERTOWN 256 166 1 72 98 0 5 166 6 8 :5 35 816 TOTAL 702 516 5 208 326 3 9 499 19 35 7 71i 2404 29,2% 21.5% .2% 11.7% 13.6% .1% .4% 20.8% .8X 1.5X .3X 5.1r. 100.0% CLINTON HUB (31 AD!RONDACK 144 142 3 41 7Z 0 9 166 3 II 1 23 612 ALTONA 190 157 2 55 101 0 6 172 3 16 1 28 731 BARE HILL it16 295 3 127 2itO 2 15 572 14 19 5 59 15it5 CAMP GABRIELS 115 14 0 25 itS 0 0 65 1 Ii 0 2 502 CH4TEAUGAV ASACT 25 35 0 7 14 1 0 it2 1 3 0 1 129 CLINTON 71(, 411 9 233 353 3 81 595 26 35 7 5111 2787 FRANKLIN 376 358 7 102 204 0 10 422 I> 19 3 56 1543 LVON HOUNTAIN 53 43 9 18 17 1 a 41 0 3 0 4 160 TOTAL 1985 1Ii15 24 b08 1046 7 121 1871i 54 108 15 451 7809 25.4Y. 19.4Y. .3% 7.8% 13.4% .1% 1.5% 24.0% .7% 1.4% .2Y. 1i.8Y. 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (41 EASTERN 165 135 3 171 144 1 72 214 15 11 4 206 1141 SHAWANGUNK 69 52 3 88 67 1 3& 76 5 3 2 139 541 SULLIVAN 1411 91 7 90 78 1 39 142 8 7 0 111 722 ULSTER 272 105 0 77 88 0 0 93 0 5 0 1511 798 WALLKILL 88 90 1 53 68 0 24 135 !o 11 1 73 550 WOODIIOURNE 201 131 4 81 115 1 37 177 11 6 3 128 895 TOTAL 943 604 111 560 560 208 837 45 43 10 8lS 4647 20.3% 13.0% .4% 12.1% 12.1% .1% 4.5% 18.0Y. 1.0% .9% .2% 17.Ii% 100.0% SING SING HUB (51 " BEDFORD HILLS 347 130 3 61 21 2 0 54 1 3 2 112 736 SING SING 4114 335 If 2100 288 1 87 463 111 27 10 2112 2264 TACONIC 159 99 1 48 9 2 0 62 0 0 0 21 401 TOTAL 990 564 15 369 318 5 87 579 19 30 12 415 3401 29.1% 16.'% .4% 1O.8Y. 9.4% .1% 2.6% 17.0% .6% .9Yo .4% 12.2% 100.0% GREEN HAVEN HUB (61 CAHP BEACON FEH 103 52 1 33 4 0 0 22 0 2 0 2 219 DOWIISTATE 608 514 :5 103 197 0 16 292 II 14 1 86 1642 FISHKILL 5118 5511 2 168 211 1 72 410 7 15 Ii 1110 1797 GREEN HAVEN 557 230 6 252 250 2 120 572 14 18 4 lt42 2067 "ID-ORANGE 147 126 5 54 75 1 1& 117 4 4 0 57 675 OTISVILLE 139 'IS 1 41 70 26 1411 4 11 73 '28 TOTAL ,\742 1155 16 671 807 •4 249 1431 37 64 10• 1110 7026 2i'~,8y' 16.4% .2% 9.'% 11.5% .1% 5.5% 20.4% .5% GREAT "EADOW HB (71 .9% .1X 12.'% 100.0% CAMP "CGREGOR 411 64 2 34 50 0 0 94 2 3 0 it 2111 COXSACKIE '\05 78 5 14 233 0 5 III 10 8 0 90 959 GREAT "EAIlOW ll30 2011 3 122 259 3 49 519 15 22 6 208 1544 ClREENE 593 176 10 50 349 0 19 240 13 8 1 79 lli311 HUDSON 109 72 1 22 61 0 9 140 4 4 1 26 449 HUDSON WORK REL ,~1 12 0 1 111 0 1 50 3 0 0 10 96 "ORIAH SHOCK 6,S 23 0 4 35 0 0 21 0 3 0 0 154 HT "CGREGOR 93 139 2 64 60 0 .. 156 4 15 0 15 554 WASHINGTON 2110 224 2 64 153 0 22 247 II 23 6 55 10114 TOTAL 1947 996 25 375 119& 3 111 13511 59 86 14 487 6659 29.2Y. 15.0% .4% 5.6% 18.0r. .0% ATTICA HUB 1111 1.n 20.4% .9X 1.3% .2% 7.3% 100.0% ALBION FEHALE 573 2711 2 132 17 1 0 102 1 4 1 51 1162 ATTICA it76 302 5 212 275 3 66 383 21 20 7 316 20116 COLLINS 35e 160 4 93 152 GROVELAND a 9 196 5 11 7 1511 1135 309 148 0 69 116 1 6 165 It 13 1 1lt4 976 GROVELAND FEM "ED 135 78 0 27 11 0 0 32 0 0 0 17 300 GROVELAND FEH "IN 48 35 0 16 5 0 0 11 0 0 0 5 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 154 100 0 20 LAKEVIEW 93 0 0 811 4 7 1 1 468 RECEP 76 1(1 0 14 46 0 0 19 0 1 1 :5 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 33 5 0 2 23 0 0 9 0 0 0 LIVINGSTON 125 200 0 98 2 74 ORLEANS 107 1 5 213 5 lli :5 16 788 507 218 5 87 140 1 6 211> 8 9 2 96 1293 WENDE 201 76 5 81 102 0 13 97 9 3 a 201 WYQHING 321 5 88 206 788 TOTAL 5"" 2 6 50S 10 10 7 116 1640 355' 1939 24 939 1293 'I 111 11136 67 95 50 1104 nooio 52.3% 17.6% .V- 8.5% 11.8% 14.1:< .,r. AUBURN HUB (9) .n 1.'% .8% .5r. 1O ••r. lGO.O% AUBURN 304 1910 7 201 22. DUTLER 5 59 296 11 20 10 3111 1711 SHOCk 65 51 0 11 31i 51 2 1 0 1 177 BUTLER ASACTC 28 23 1 15 24 • • 22 :5 0 0 CAMP GEORGETOWN 113 31 1 10 68 'I 123 CAMP PHARSALIA • • 27 2 3 1 3 259 72 it7 0 21 28 •0 1• 28 0 4 0 , 207 CAYUGA 294 86 0 21 202 0 ELMIRA 3 111 10 4 0 65 794 761 215 9 86 236 2 26 236 17 12 7 140 1745 "ONTEREV SHOCK 54 26 1 5 45 0 0 55 5 0 0 ROCHESTER 52 47 0 1 0 147 28 1 1 19 0 1 0 "'9 1" SOUTHPORT 165 79 5 54 129 0 27 120 (, 9 TOTAL 1906 777 24 425 94 686 lGl3 8 117 '25 54 54 18• 7" 6088 31.5;': 12.8)! .lor. '.9% .1% 1.9r. lS.2% .9% .9% .3% NEil YORK CITY (U) 14.'" 12.6" u •. e:c ARTHURKILL 22' 1n 3 128 52 1" (I 5 : U In BAYVIEW 54 2 21 5 • 22 0 lit 145 IlAYVIEW WORK REL 22 '"30 ""12 2 • • 17 '"• 2 , 2 17 EDGECOIIlIE 72 89 2• 45 "'9 1• a• 155 2• 10 ·0• 27 UI fULTON 106 87 1 57 53 0 , 151 2 8 0 15 LINCOLN 90 89 2 34 48 (I 101 7 0 19 "tosn PARKSIDE 40 25 1 16 5 • 0 16 •0 0 0 2 105 QUEENSBORO 199 210 2 36 107 •1 16 243 (I 6 5 52 an TOTAL 1112 731 15 265 395 2 70 879 16 41 6 174 3409 23.1Ir. 2l.6X .itlC .7.8r. 11.Ii)( .1lC 2.1% 25.81: .5% 1.2% .21: 5.1% 100.0% GRAHl! TOTAL 16207 "511 178 48" 7'68 ... 8 1131 11366 401 650 153 5347 57907 28.1% 17.2% .3% 8."'% 15.V. .1% 2.'r. 19.')( .n 1,1)! .v. .,.v. lOO.'% .-

L -63-

Inmate Security Classification Status

The security classification status of inmates is presented in Table 23. The majority, 55.8%, are medium security, primarily "Medium A". However, 25.9% are "Maximum A "--the highest security classification. There is considerable variation between clusters in the percentages of different types of security classification. For example, cluster 2 (Watertown Hub) has 0.1 % maximum A inmates, but cluster 9 (Auburn Hub) has 54.5% (see also Figure 23) ..

Figure 23 Inmates Classified As Maximum Security (Percent of Cluster Population)

100 90 80 70 .- P e 60 r c e 50 n t 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 .. 5 6 7. e . 9~''''' 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM AU Aub NYC Pop Cluster -64-

TABLE 23. CLUSTER AND FACILITV BV SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF INHATE; UNDERCUSTODV POPULATION ~AN 1, 1992 CLUSTER HAX A HAX B HED A HED B HIN TDTAL ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) ~OHNSTOWN ASACTC 0 0 121 35 26 182 HARCV 4 0 987 182 268 1441 HID-STATE 6 0 1118 203 53 1380 HOHAWK 25 2 522 80 578 1207 ONIEDA 3 1 781 171 127 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 0 0 24 8 45 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 0 0 20 5 65 90 TOTAL 38 3 3573 684 1162 5460 .7% .1% 65.4% 12.5% 21.3% 100.0% WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 0 0 568 89 132 789 OGDENSBURG 0 0 637 125 37 799 WATERTOWN 2 0 645 123 46 816 TOTAL 2 0 " 1850 337 215 2404 .1% .0% 77.0)( 14.0% 8.9% 100.0% CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 1 0 454 118 39 612 ALTONA 4 0 577 120 30 731 BARE HILL 7 0 1292 117 129 1545 CAH!' GABRIELS 0 0 0 0 302 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 0 0 88 16 25 129 , CLINTON 2155 333 267 16 10 2781 FRANKLIN 3 I) 1225 240 75 1543 LVON MOUNTAIN 0 ,\ 0 0 160 160 TOTAL 2170 333 3903 627 770 7803 27.8% 4.3% 50.0% 8.0% t,9% 100.0% SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 440 463 145 30 63 1141 SHAWANGUNK 503 17 21 0 0 541 SULLIVAN 467 19 45 4 187 722 ULSTER 0 1 359 56 225 641 WALLKILL 5 0 403 114 28 550 WOODBOURNE 5 0 815 70 5 895 TOTAL 1420 500 1788 274 508 4490 31.6% 11.1% 39.8% 6.1% 11.3% 100.0% SING SING HUB (!i,) BEDFORD HILLS 267 135 125 45 130 702 SING SING 1228 356 573 43 63 22,,~ TACONIC 0 0 172 94 135 401 TOTAL 1495 491 870 182 328 3366 44.4% 14.6% 25.11% 5.4% 9.7% 100.0% aREfN HAVEN HUB (6) CAMP BEACON !'EH 0 0 0 0 219 219 DOWNSTATE 307 2011 5911 9tl 209 1420 FISHKILL 10 1 1561 134 91 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1767 114 156 16 14 2067 HID-ORANGE 3 0 472 167 31 673 OTISVILLE 1 0 536 63 211 6211 TOTAL 2088 323 3323 478 592 6804 311.7% 4.7% 411.11% 7.0% 11.7% 100.0% GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAMP HCGREGOR 0 0 1 0 280 2111 COXSACKIE , 409 490 48 5 7 959 GREAT HEADOW 1402 98 43 1 0 1544 GREENE II 0 1262 ~O8 60 1538' HUDSON 0 0 136 272 41 449 HUDSON WORK REL 1 0 39 25 31 96 HORIAH SHOCK 0 0 46 7 101 154 "T HCGREGOR 1 0 355 117 81 554 WASHINGTON 22 0 926 94 42 1084 TOTAL 11143 5811 21156 729 643 6659 ::'7.7% 11.8% 42.9% 10.9% 9.7% 100.0% ATTICA HUB (II) ALBIOM FEMALE 0 0 486 203 473 1162 ATTICA 1844 131 92 14 5 2086 COLLINS 5 Q 976 127 25 1133 GROVELAND 4 0 751 177 44 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 0 0 134 52 114 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 0 0 0 0 118 1111 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 0 0 154 54 260 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 1 0 64 21 92 178 LAKEVIEW ASAT 0 0 14 5 55 74 LIVINGSTON 2 0 421 1111 277 788 ORLEANS 6 1 101111 129 69 1293 WENDE 653 611 43 , 2 0 766 WVOHING 6 0 1297 226 111 1640 TOTAL 2521 200 5520 1098 11>43 10982 23.0% 1.8% 50.3% 10.07- 15.07- 100.0% AUBURN HUI (9) AUBURN 1551 27 94 13 21 1706 BUTLER SHOCK a 0 45 111 114 177 IUTLER ASACTC 0 0 86 lil 22 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 0 0 0 0 259 259 CAMP PIIARSALIA 0 0 0 0 207 207 CAVUGA 12 0 667 71 44 794 ELHIRA 1070 289 257 45 67 17211 HONTEREV SHOCK 0 0 44 12 111 167 ROCHESTER 0 0 72 34 93 199 SOUTHPORT 662 Q 22 2 0 686 TOTAL 3295 316 12117 2U 938 6046 54.57- 5.2r. 21.3% 3.5)! 15.5r. 100.0r. NEW YORK CITY HUI (10) ARTHURKILL 2 1 7411 102 311 G91 IAYVIEM 0 0 36 57 72 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 0 0 12 20 55 87 EDGr;CotllE 0 1 251 <;2 114 4511 FULTON 0 2 185 91 166 444 LINCOlN 4 1 195 70 1211 3911 PARKSIDE 1 II 24 33 45 103 t,'l~ENSBORO 0 1i 400 158 300 1163 TOTAL 7 10 11151 623 918 3409 .2r. .3r. 54.3r. 111.3r. 26.9r. 100.Dr. GRAND TOTAL 141179 2764 26021 5242 7717 57423 25.9r. 4.11% 46.7r. 9.1r. 13.4r. Uo.Or. -65-

Central Monitoring Status

Approximately 10% of under custody inmates are identified as "central monitoring status" cases. Due to the nature of the instant offense, or to prior criminal recora, or to other particular characteristics certain inmates have special limitations on when and to what correctional facilities they may be transferred. "A" status cases may not be moved from one facility to another without review by the Department's Division of Classification and Movement. "Bit status cases may be moved to Ci. facility of the same security level but cannot be transferred to a lower security level (e.g. from a maximum security facility to a medium security facility) without review by Classification and Movement.

There is some variation among clusters in the percent of persons in this status, ranging from 3.5% (cluster 2, Watertown Hub) to 16.1 % (cluster 5, Sing Sing Hub) see Figure 24 and Table 24.

Figure 24 Central Monitoring Status (A Status and 8 Status)

20 IDA Status !EIJ B Status I 15 ----

1 2 3 " 5 6 7 a 9 10 Total Onl Wat CII Sui SS GH GM Att Aub NYC Pop Cluster -66-

TABLE 24. CLUSTER AND FACILITY BY CENTRAL HONITORING STATUS OF INHATE; UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I, 1992 CLUSTER CENTRAL HDNITORING STATUS TOTAL AND FACILITY NOT CHC A STATUS B STATUS CASE ONEIDA HUB (CLUSTER 1) JOHNSTOWN ASACTC 178 1 3 182 HARCY 1386 2 53 1441 HID-STATE 1302 3 75 1380 HOHAWK 1172 0 35 1207 ONIEDA 1013 3 67 1083 SUHHIT SHOK HALE 77 0 0 77 SUHHIT SHOCK FEH 90 0 0 90 TOTAL 5218 9 233 5460 95.67- ~ .27- 4.37- 100.07- WATERTOWN HUB (2) GOUVERNEUR 762 1 26 789 OGDENSBURG 775 0 24 799 WATERTOWN 782 0 34 816 TOTAL 2319 1 84 2404 96.5% .07- 3.57- 10Q.07- CLINTON HUB (3) ADIRONDACK 567 1 44 612 ALTONA 703 0 28 731 BARE HILL 14 .. 7 0 98 1545 CAHP GABRIELS 302 0 0 302 CHATEAUGAY ASACT 128 0 1 129 CLINTON 2109 253 425 2787 FRANKLIN 1497 4 42 1543 LYON HOUNTAIN 159 0 1 160 TOTAL 6912 258 639 7809 88.5% 3.37- 8.27- 100.07- SULLIVAN HUB (4) EASTERN 938 47 156 1141 SHAWANGUNK 363 78 100 541 SULLIVAN 571 67 84 722 ULSTER 794 0 4 798 WALLKILL 509 1 40 550 WOODBOURNE 77J. 13 111 895 TOTAL 3946 206 495 4647 84,97- 4.47- 10.77. 100.0% SING SING HUB (5) BEDFORD HILLS 588 34 114 736 SING SING 1951 27 286 2264 TACONIC 380 0 21 401 TOTAL 2919 61 421 3401 85.87- 1.87- 12.47- 100.07- GREEN HAVEN HUB (6) CAHP BEACON FEH 219 0 0 219 DOWNSTATE 1540 39 63 1642 FISHKILL 1622 8 167 1797 GREEN HAVEN 1615 117 335 2067 HID-ORANGE 650 3 20 673 OTISVILLE 593 2 33 628 TOTAL 6239 169 618 7026 88.8r. 2.47- 8.87- 100.07- GREAT HEADOW HUB (7) CAHP HCGREGOR 281 II 0 281 CO)(SACKIE 931 6 22 959 GREAT HEADOW 1262 129 153 1544 GREENE 1497 2 39 1538 HUDSON 433 1 15 449 HUDSON WORK REL 90 0 (, 96 HORIAN SHOCK 154 0 0 154 HT HCGREGOR 540 0 14 554 WASHINGTON 1020 2 62 1084 TOTAL 6208 140 311 6659 93.27- 2.17. 4.77- 100.07- ATTICA HUB (8) ALBION FEHALE 1098 1 63 1162 ATTICA 1623 212 251 2086 COLLINS 999 3 131 1133 GROVELAND 878 3 95 976 GROVELAND FEH HED 290 0 10 300 GROVELAND FEH HIN 117 0 1 118 LAKEVIEW SHOCK 468 0 0 468 LAKEVIEW RECEP 174 0 4 178 LAKfVIEW ASAT 73 0 1 74 LIVINGSTON 776 1 11 788 ORLEANS 1192 2 99 1293 WENDE 631 69 88 788 WYOHING 1590 3 47 1640 TOTAL 9909 294 801 11004 90.0,7. 2.77- 7.3% 100.07- AUBURN HUB (9) AUBURN 1282 168 261 1711 BUTLER SHOCK 177 0 0 177 BUTLER ASACTC 121 0 2 123 CAHP GEORGETOWN 259 0 0 259 CAHP PHARSALIA 206 0 1 207 CAYUGA 771 0 23 794 ELHIRA 1573 59 133 1765 HONTEREY SHOCK 166 0 1 167 ROCHESTER 198 0 1 199 SOUTHPORT 587 36 63 686 TOTAL 5340 263 485 6088 87.7Y. 4.57- 8.0% 100.0% HEW YORK CITY HUB ClO) ARTHURKILL 845 4 42 891 BAYVIEW 148 0 17 165 BAYVIEW WORK REL 86 0 1 87 EDGECOItBE 447 11 458 fULTON 428 1• 15 444 LINCOLN 385 13 598 PAIIKSIDE 100 • 5 lOS QUEENSBORO 821 •1 41 863 TOTAL 3260 6 143 3409 95.6% .2Y. 4.2% 100.0% '. GRAND TOTAL 52270 1407 4230 57907 90.3% 2.4% 7.37- 100.0% ------

------~~::::::... :-->-.:'- L ' +QK.llEAUGAT •• """, ...... ,' ....'IC ,.~ HALE FACILITIES /.' "' ... \ ;'. elft£ ilLL -'lt0N4. ' " '\..,'. IR.lJ«LiN \ MAXIMUM SECURITY NEW YORK STATE ,I'aOCOfHS!k.ItG 'J,f • .OClI OH\ ATTICA GREAI I1PDP" CRfEH HAVEN ,,' • RIVERVIEW l: \ • LYON III. ~ \ AL'SUIlN " I • • • CLI NI 011 Stu. WANCUN( CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES , " ' 1-::1 I COXSACKIE SING-SING " , , • .,... m:JB:!® ' DOWNSTATE SOUIHPORI , " I , \ '• .. , EASTERN SULLIVAN " " 2 " " 1\",-_\ • G.lSRJ[& __ ---' :I ELHIRA WENOE ,I' .. , ,,' '.... " ~, ,'1 '... \ .. Ao,aCf4)lC1: MEDIUH SECURITY AD I ROf()ACC HID-ORANGE REGIONAL ,,' .. ~ GOU'tfJtK~" \ ""' ...... ' ,I' ALIONA KID-SIAIE / .ClPt YIHC[NT .. '"'.. " 0' LlOIlP'} " ----, .. J. \~v \ I £OGECOtltlE ,_, .. _ .. _-...... ". 'I' A1ACICI'!itX:! ..I.... ,..-...... c.. , "" tTrT"TR1\1 f AlLSBtlRG AI/NEX OOEENSBORO / I cmDID ,H0CIE51[~O' , - I .... _~\ " '. • KID- TATE , '. ~I. • I fULIOII ROCI'.ESTER LA~EV I Ell SHOC~ SUI1IIIT 5HOC~ ,,;,' .000[0()( ~ _ \,-·~-t:--.---i:' ...... ·~\.> ..W:~!m J)t~ ...,. 1\ ""I."i~ ! LINCOLN ''''ALOO J r i___ ' • 1 . .A~ t ...... l " I 1 J ----'-1-, I - -t--_.J .I'~: : L. ,,". ~,/ ',U--l:-n-J"'" ,,'1"-- /', .COJ/5'CJ:lf .,' MENTAL HEALTH FACILITES . , ·..... r...... I' ! • .~ I \,' '--t 1 • , ' .. "", ' .OJf..O$OHr' GRfA T IlEAOOW II£NQE "",_••..!. • ~ -· •• ----f-.' , I «!J:!!B) , .' ---, I /'-.... - ":1:';:-.' .' ,-' .. , \.,.,- I I ... __ ... -r; BAYVIEW P'R~SIDE ...... ' ",: .OIl5VIL~LI~~' IIEACOII SUH>Ill SHOC( • ALCOHOL & SUBSTANCE ABUSE CORRECTIONAL JREATHENT FACILITIES (ASACTC) " ·"t~au.~" ~- ...... CEOfORD HILL5 lACONIC \ ~ • ./----'..<:".!COIIIc' '\ o YORK RELEASE , '~l'. tc.OIa HIUS, .,... ~.~.SI~ SING ' !J!!JJ..!! .~ '\ /, o HENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES --- ..'. ~ " .:,.. RECEPTION CENTERS rI.i.~~ ~ :.tr:N -.= ~ RECEPTION CENTERS & CLASSlrIC~TION CENTERS .-.-

!POllED 3'25/92 -68- Appendix B. Table '1.

SECUIUTY LEVEL NUflBER AIiERAGE MEDIAN HAIUHUI1 SECUR I TY ATTICA GEIlEAAL 20U 154.6 '0.0 ATTICA ICP 7:1 7~.7 57.0 AUIIURN GENERAL 1567 155.1 120.0 AUIIURN DEPOT .~ 5~.1I :10.0 AUBURN ICP 50 I~.o 711.0 CLINTOIj GENERAL 1716 153.11 8~.0 CLI NTOIj NoINEX 0 711.7 72.0 ClINTOIj ICP 5. 116.8 40.0 n5 96.0 72.0 CLINTOIj i'lERLE COOPER " CLINTOIj APPU 25. 12:1.11 72.0 COKSAatlE .5. ...~ 5~.0 DOWNSTATE GENERAL 251 '11.1 72.0 DOIIIISTATE RECEPTlOIj 1411 60.0 50.0 EASTERN GENERAL .61 17',0 1611.0 EASTERN SDO 50 84.5 5'.0 ELHIRA GENERAL 12.5 10'.1 72.0 ELMIRA RECEPTlOIj 415 52.1 211.0 ELMIRA ICP 55 55.11 5'.0 GllEAT MEADOW GlENERAl 1544 120.' 72.' GllEEN HAVEH GElERAL 2017 1111.5 1711.0 SHAMANGUNK 541 25'.11 1110.0 SING SING 1577 124.1 96.0 SING SING TRANSIT 1150 112.0 114.0 SING SING ICP 57 ee.o 72.0 SOUllil'ORT 558 '11.5 48.0 SOUTHPORT CADRE 1211 1211.4 114.0 SUlLIVAN 485 166.7 150.0 S(;t.LIVAN ICP 58 107.5 84.0 MENDE 711 1'2.5 120.0 tlENDE RECEPT I 0Ij 25 22.5 21.0 MENDE SPECIAL NEEDS 52 54.0 56.0 SUIITOTAL 20:122 127.7 114.0 HElIII!H SECURITY AD IRQNDACI( 612 55.11 50.0 AL T()IjA 751 5.11.7 50.0 ARTHURKILL ee. 48.0 56 •• ARTHURKL WfI DIS CNTR 2 24.0 24 •• &ARE HILL IS4S 5'.2 56.' BUTLER ASACTC 12:1 :15.1 50. a CAVUGA 7t4 55.7 2~.0 CHATEAUGV ASACTC 12' 51.5 50.0 COLLINS 1155 46.5 !I'.O EASTERN GalERAL 150 40.7 50.0 FISHKIt.L GENERAL 1"5 U.II 54.0 FISHKILL DEPOT 71 51.' :10.0 FISHKILL _I( RELEASE U 54.1 211.0 F~ANKLiN 1545 55.5 SO.O GOUVERNEUR 711. 53 ... 24.0 GIIEEN HAVEH GENERAL 50 .... 4 56.0 GllEENE 15S11 SII.5 50.0 GllOI/ELAND .76 42.' 56.0 IfUDSON GENERAL 44. 56.0 .IOHIISTOWN ASACTC 1112 "'.1:11.1 50.0 UKEIIIENSHOCK 21 •• n.D LAll.EIIIEN RECEPTlOIj ''0178 21.7 18.0 LAll.EVIEM ASACTC 74 18.1 16.0 L1VINGSTOIj 7ee, 5~.' 50.0 MARCY 1292 :15.:1 50.0 MARCY ANNEX 149 54.5 30.0 HID-ORANGE 675 54.7 42.0 MID-STATE 1 SIlO 5 •• 5 56.0 HOHAlIK 1164 211.1 2~.O MOHAN!( MALSH HElIICAL 45 115.5 60.0 Hi MCGaEGOR GENERAL 501 55.1 24.0 OGDENSBURG 7" 51.6 2~.0 OIjIEDA 1107 37.40 50.0 ONEIDA HUll CEMTRAL 27' 2~.' 2~.0 ORLEAHS 1215 56.7 sO.a OTISVILLE 628 62.' 54.0 ULSTER 54 52.2 2~.O ULSTER RECEPTIOIj 740 .. 2'.1 24.0 IlALLKILL 550 70.7 60.0 WASHINGTOIj ue4 46.2 56.0 ~TERTOWN 816 55.2 211.0 IIOODBOURNE 8.5 .... 60.0 IMlMING 164. 55.4 28.0 SUBTOTAL 2"50 50.0 MINI_ SECURITY 't.' auTLER SHOCK 177 22.5 24.0 LYON MOUNTAIN 160 211.5 50.0 MONTER£Y SHOat 167 20 •• 18.0 MORIAH SHOat 154 21.5 111.0 Hi IICGItEGOR Jill TRH 55 .... 5 :16.0 SUlLIVAN III 22.7 24.0 SUMMIT $HOCIt-lW.E 77 21.8 2'.0 SUIITOTAL 24.:1 2~.0 MINIMUfI tkl4Ut RELEASE EDGECOMBE '"~58 5 •• " 50.0 FUlTOIj '~4 56.6 50.0 HUlISON IIORIt R£lEASE 45.1 56.0 LINCOlN st. 41.1 56.0 ORLEAHS tkl4Ut II£LEASE "111 56.1 50.0 QI&NSIIOItO 165 57.' 5'.0 Roct£STER I" 54.0 50.0 SUIITOTAL 2556 SII.S 56.0 MINIMUM CAMPS CAllI" GABR!Et.S 502 1'.7 111.0 c:AHP GEORGETOWN 25. 18.4 11.0 c:AHP IICGItEGOR 2111 25.2 24.0 c:AHP I'tWtSALIA 207 22.1 .. 111.0 SUBTOTAL 114' 21.1 111.' FEMALE FACILITIES ALBIOIj I'EMAlE 1162 2'.1 24.0 IAVIIIElI 165 5'.2 50.0 IlAVIIIEN MORIC II£lEASE 17 52.5 50.0 BEDFORD HLS GENERAL 551 105.0 72.0 BEDFORD HlS RECEPTlOIj 165 29.' 24.0 BEDFORIl HlS let' 22 75.4 55.0 IIE..coN FEHALf: 21. 22.7 24.0 GIIOVELANIl FEH t£I) 500 :12.4 24.0 GllOIIElANll FEH MIN 118 22.1 24.0 PARKSlDE lOS 55.5 5'.0 SUflMIT SHOOt-FEM .0 24.7 24.0 T AC()IjIC FEMALE 401 51.8 24.0 SUBTOTAL 55111 42.5 24.' GIIANIl TOTAL 57807 n.' 5'.0 -69- Appendix B. Table 2.

SECURITY LEVEL AND FACILITY 8Y HINIHUH SENTENCE: UNDERCUSTODY POPULATION JAN I. I ~n TOTAL SECUR ITY LEVl::L 12-17 111-25 2~-35 36-~7 ;;11-71 72-11~ 120-17~ 180-23~ 2<00 • AND FACILITY HONTHS HONTHS HONTHS HO

I1A~II1U11 SECURITY ATTICA GENERAL 32 222 "0 255 ;;56 ,,~ 192 422 2012 ATTICA ICP 4 14 12 7 I~ II 5 75 " 406 1565 AUBURN GENERAL 24 60 151 102 "'5 30~ 2Q2 1116" AUBURN DEPOT 16" 13 23 II 6 10 4 2 4 119 AUBURN ICP 2 2 10 5 5 II 5 I 12 50 CLI NTON GENERAL 41 112 262 149 205 5U 1711 122 559 1711 CLINTON ANNE)( 5 20 117 60 .5 195 47 50 III 555 CLINTON ICP 6 3 II , IS 6 4 4 59 CLINTON MERLE COOPER 2 5 24 III 45 61 I~ 10 16 195 CLINTON APPU II 15 29 19 50" <\6 20 2~ 45 259 CO)(SACKIE 67 74 151 1116 266 41 511 40 .59 DOWNSTATE GENERAL 7 III 12 61 III 10 :s a 231 DOWNSTATE RECEPTION 164 217• 374 179" 1;;4 147 55 211 70 1376 EASTERN GENERAL 7 16 25 23 52 11111 176 I" 277 .61 EASTERN SDU 1 2 II 2 2 5 2 2 !I 50 167 I'LHIR" GENERAL 24 611 l!:S 114 177 566 121 1291 ELHIRA RECEPTION 611 53 10! 44 42 64 1'; 5 12 410 " 2 55 ELHIRA fcr .. 10 9 11 7 0 3 GREAT HEADOW GENERAL 23 711• 206 158 211 371 1';4 102 250 1542 GREEN HAVEN GENERAL 6 58 62 116 436 507 35. ,j 654 2017 55. SHAWANGlNC 2 5 11 13 24 .11 75 ?15 SING SING 20 57" 1"'2 116 143 514 170 162 ~ ~35 1377 56 .5 2.5 .5 " i06 1129 SING SING ~ANSIT H 36 U .; SING SING ICP 4 0 7 12 17 4 4 56 .. 65 5511 SOUTHPOIIT 30 52 101 71 116 tI 51 "51 SOUTHPORT CADRE I 2 14 12 III 26 21 , 25 1211 SULLIVAN 6 III 32 25 511 .7 58 611 HI 4111 SULLIVAN ICP 1 2 3 6 II 15 5 7 7 57 186 710 WENDE 4 111 50 47 72 145 91 97 WENDE RECEPTION I 1 1 1 0 0 0 o ' 4 WENDE SPECIAL NEEDS 5 4 14 12 5• 1 1 1 52 TOTAL 601 1043 2559 16011 2522 4~" 2099 1956 3747 20231 3.0X 5.2X 11.7X 7.9X 11.5X 22.2X IO."X" , .• 7X 11l.5X 100. OX I1EDIUH SECURITY ADIRONDACK 50 86 211 1211 85