Reminiscences of Colonel H. S. Olcott

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reminiscences of Colonel H. S. Olcott $/->(, 7. tk /y t REMINISCENCES OF COLONEL H. S. OLCOTT BY VARIOUS WRITERS * COMPILED BY HRIDAYA NARAIN AGARWAL, M.A., LL.B. r~ THEOSOPHICAL PUBLISHING HOUSE Adyar, Madras, India 1932 L.3t. THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY 591100 A ASTOR, LENOX AND TILDEN FOUNDATIONS If 1932 L ACKN O WLEDGME N T MOST of these Reminiscences have been reprinted from various journals with the kind permission of the Editors. References are indicated in the table of Contents. H. S. OLCOTT an. officer in the Federal Army, in the early part of the Civil War in U.S.A. 1861—1865. -J f J i I A* I Jj PREFACE TO many the name of Colonel H. S. Olcott merely recalls the fact that he was President of the Theosophical Society, but the intrinsic value of his work is not adequately recognised. Truly, Madame H. P. Blavatsky was the teacher and the originator of Theosophy, but the credit for the propagation of the Theo- sqphical truths goes largely to Colonel Olcott. Undoubtedly, without him the mere existence of those truths was certain, but the splendid Organisation—The Theosophical Society-—is chiefly due to his great zeal and earnest endeavours. ^ To remind us, therefore, of the great part tD " played by him in the organisation of the Theosophical Society, I have ventured to w , . 1 1 compile this little book as a loving tribute to his q q , memory, on the occasion of the Founders’ Convention of the Society held at Adyar in December, 1931. Madame H. P. Blavatsky was born on August 11, 1831, and Colonel Olcott on August 2, 1832. There is already a compilation giving the tributes of those who knew Madame Blavatsky well. This work, which records the tributes of those who knew Colonel Olcott, is published to give an insight into his manifold activities for human welfare. The first two letters record the judgment passed on Colonel Olcott by his Master, the Master M., and by the Master K. H. who along with the Master M. inspired Madame Blavatsky to found the Society to check the overwhelming tide of materialism. H. N. AGARWAL Adyar, December, 1931. CONTENTS PAGE Preface . ................................. V I. (From The Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom, Second Series, Letter 26) . 1 II. (From The Mahatma Letters) 5 III. By H. P. Blavatsky (From The Theo- sophist, August, 1931) . 6 IV. Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, by Annie Besant (From The Theosophist, March, 1907) ..... 12 V.Henry Steel Olcott, by C» W. Lead- beater (From The Theosophist, May, 1909) ..... 23 VI.Lest We Forget, by M. R. H. (From The Theosophist, February, 1930) . 34 VII. The President-Founder, by A. P. Sinnett (From Vahan, March, 1907) 40 VIIL In Memoriam, by Upendra Nath Basu (From Theosophy in India, March, 1907) ..... 42 V lll PAGE TX Personal Reminiscences of Colonel H. S. Olcott, by A. P. Warrington (From The Theosophist, March, s 1929) . 46 4 X. Henry Steel Olcott, by A. Schwarz (From The Theosophist, December, x 1931) . 51 XI. Colonel Olcott as a Great Mesmerist, by B. Ranga Reddy . 59 XII. Some Reminiscences of Colonel Olcott, by Sarah E. Palmer (From Theosophy in India, December, 1913) . • 62 XIII. More Reminiscences of Colonel Olcott, by J. Harry Carnes (From The Adyar Notes and News, * February 14, 1929) . 67 XIV. By A. K. Sitarama Shastri, (From The Adyar Notes and News, May 24, ‘ 1928) . .... 7 0 | XV. Faithful unto Death, by C. W. Lead- beater (From The Theosophic Messenger, November, 1908) . 71 ■ ■■. t m Last Message of the President- f >' T j| i Founder. c . 81 REMINISCENCES OP COLONEL H. S. OLCOTT I AT Upasika’s prayer, I hereby state the follow­ ing facts: No letter blaming Henry Olcott, accusing him of incompetency, or entrusting the management of the T. S.’s affairs to Mr. S. G. L. Fox, has ever been sent by me, or received by him, whether in London or elsewhere. The last page of a long business letter written in October 1884 and addressed by me to Upasika—a woman who served me faithfully —contained a para (2-3rd of a page) concern­ ing Mr. L. Fox ; and agreeably with her instruc­ tions, she sent it to the latter asking for it back and burning it. The rest of my letter was not 2 shown nor has he been allowed to either see or touch it. Therefore he knows nothing of it. In the aforesaid para he was told of the advisability to return forthwith to India for purposes of influencing in the right direction the disturbed minds of the Anglo-Indian * bara-sahabs1 and thereby helping his own (L. Fox’s) karma. It is for this purpose—no other—that he was asked to go. Any other construction made upon what was written (by Mr. L. Fox or anyone else) is false. It is my desire that anyone, who heard Mr. L. Fox blame the “ Founder ” Olcott, those who have listened to the cruel words of censure directed again at Henry Olcott by Mr. L. Fox, should now hear too what I have to say of him. If Henry has erred, it is because he is human, and being human, often believed in false and foolish advisers more “ incompetent ” than he whom they so blamed. If he is “ ignorant ” of many things, so are his accusers, and because he remains still uninitiated the reason for which is very plain: to this day he has preferred the good of the many to his own personal benefit. Having 1 Hindustani for ** big folk **. given up the advantages derived from steady, serious chelaship by those who devote themselves to it, for his work for other people— these are those who now turn against him. Let Mr. S. G. L. Fox know what I now say: whatever Henry Olcott’s shortcomings we are well pleased with, and thank him. Let it be known to all what I think, and now state (under) my own signature. Henry Olcott has served and followed his Master “ to the last gasp with truth and loyalty As another great but as erratic English genius truly puts it, “ Fools are they who believe in every lying report and have not the energy to admit it; fools they who disbelieve in such and have not the courage to proclaim it. Shy and cowardly, vicious and hypocritical those whom calumny can alarm or who will lend a willing ear to it. * Looks like truth ’—they say; does it ? Do they forget that ‘ a lie is never more successful than when she baits her hook with truth * ? ” Fools, fools! who do not see that all Asura- dugpas are at work for the destruction of the Society,1 their only, their last enemy of 1 The attack of the Christian Missionaries using the Coulombs, with the subsequent denunciation of H. P. B. as a fraud by the Society for Psychical Research. 4 Salvation on the present troubled waters of Kali-yug 1 Blind are they who see and perceive not. Their karma is spun ; but what Masters can or shall help those who refuse to help themselves. M.\ V. II Him we can trust under all circumstances, and his faithful service is pledged to us come well—come ill . Where can we find an equal devotion ? He is one who never questions, but obeys ; who may make innumer­ able mistakes out of excessive zeal, but never is unwilling to repair his fault even at the cost of the greatest self-humiliation ; who esteems the sacrifice of comfort and even life something to be cheerfully risked whenever necessary; who will eat any food, or even go without; sleep on any bed, work in any place, fraternise with any outcast, endure any privation for the cause. K. H. I l l By H. P. Bl a v a t s k y “ TRUTH does not .depend on show of hands ” ; but in the case of the much abused President-Founder, Colonel H. S. Olcott, it must depend on the show of fa c ts. Thorny and full of pitfalls was the steep path he had to climb up, alone and unaided, for the first years. Terrible was the opposition outside the Society he had to build ; sickening and dis­ heartening the treachery he often encountered within the Headquarters; enemies gnashing their teeth in his face around ; those whom he regarded as his staunchest friends and co- workers betraying him and the Cause on the slightest provocation. Still, where hundreds in his place would have collapsed and given up the whole undertaking in despair, he, unmoved and unmovable, went on climbing up and toiling as before, unrelenting and 7 undismayed, supported by that one thought and conviction that he was doing his duty. What other inducement has the Founder ever had but his Theosophical pledge and the sense of his duty towards THOSE he had promised to serve to the end of his life ? There was but one beacon for him—the hand that had first pointed to him his way up: the hand of the Ma ster he loves and reveres so well, and serves so devotedly, though occasionally, per- haps, unwisely. President, elected for life, he has neverthe­ less offered more than once to resign in favour of anyone found worthier than him. but was never permitted to do so by the majority—not of “ show of hands ” but show of hearts, literally—as few are more beloved than he is, even by most of those who may criticise occasionally his actions. And this is only natural: for cleverer in administrative capa­ cities, more learned in philosophy, subtler in casuistry, in metaphysics or daily life policy, there may be many around him ; but the whole globe may be searched through and through and no one found stauncher to his friends, truer to his word, or more devoted 8 to real, practical Theosophy—than the Presi­ dent-Founder ; and these are the chief re­ quisites in a leader of such a movement—one that aims to become a Brotherhood of men.
Recommended publications
  • Blavatsky the Satanist: Luciferianism in Theosophy, and Its Feminist Implications
    Blavatsky the Satanist: Luciferianism in Theosophy, and its Feminist Implications PER FAXNELD Stockholm University Abstract H. P. Blavatsky’s influential The Secret Doctrine (1888), one of the foundation texts of Theosophy, contains chapters propagating an unembarrassed Satanism. Theosophical sympathy for the Devil also extended to the name of their journal Lucifer, and discussions conducted in it. To Blavatsky, Satan is a cultural hero akin to Pro- metheus. According to her reinterpretation of the Christian myth of the Fall in Genesis 3, Satan in the shape of the serpent brings gnosis and liberates mankind. The present article situates these ideas in a wider nineteenth-century context, where some poets and socialist thinkers held similar ideas and a counter-hegemonic reading of the Fall had far-reaching feminist implications. Additionally, influences on Blavatsky from French occultism and research on Gnosticism are discussed, and the instrumental value of Satanist shock tactics is con- sidered. The article concludes that esoteric ideas cannot be viewed in isolation from politics and the world at large. Rather, they should be analyzed both as part of a religious cosmology and as having strategic polemical and didactic functions related to political debates, or, at the very least, carrying potential entailments for the latter. Keywords: Theosophy, Blavatsky, Satanism, Feminism, Socialism, Ro- manticism. In September 1875, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831–1891) co-founded the Theosophical society in New York City. Colonel Henry Steel Olcott (1832–1907), lawyer and journalist, was elected its first president. Blavatsky, however, became the chief ideologist, drawing authority from the com- munications concerning esoteric matters she claimed to receive from the mysterious ‘Mahatmas’ (or ‘Masters’).
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Masters Are Close to an Isolated Lodge' : the Theosophical Society In
    "THE MASTERS ARE CLOSE TO AN ISOLATED LODGE" THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY IN TASMANIA 1089 - 1930 KEVIN BOWD , Submitted in fulfilment of requirements for the Master of Arts (Qualifying) of the University of Tasmania, Hobart 31-1-93) This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or award in any university, and to the best of this candidate's knowledge and belief contains no copy or paraphrase of material previously published or written by another person except when due reference is made in the text of this thesis. Kevin Bowd. (i) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, for fleshing out the Latrobe and Devonport story a number of dedicated theosophists and relatives of leading figures must be thanked for their memories and kind words: Mrs. Dorothy Abey and Mrs. M.F. Elliston for their knowledge of events in Latrobe. For information on Devonport, especially about the school, Mrs. Francesca Vernon and for information about his step-mother Lilian, Mr. Geoff Walpole. Secondly, for assistance in Sydney, the unfailing support of the staff of the Mitchell Library. Finally, my family, who kept me sane - my wife, Marian and my son, Solomon - both "close to the Masters". ABBREVIATIONS AT Austral Theosophist Journal ES Escteric Section of the Theosophical Society ITS Independent Theosophical Society LCC Liberal Catholic Church OCC Old Catholic Church OSE Order of the Star of the East Star Star in the East (Australian Division) Journal TAT The Australian Theosophist Journal TinA Theosophy in Australasia* TS Theosophical Society Note: The journal of the Theosophical Society in Australia was titled Theosophy in Australasia (April 1895-May 1921) when it was retitled Theosophy in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Theosophical Society's Ongoing Problem of Emotion and Control
    Taming the Astral Body: The Theosophical Society’s Ongoing Problem of Emotion and Control John L. Crow Florida State University Abstract In New York City in 1875, a group interested in Spiritualism and occult science founded what would become the Theosophical Society. Primarily the creation of Henry Steel Olcott and Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, the Theosophical Society went through a number of early incarnations. One original version promised to teach occult powers. After Blavatsky found that she could not honor earlier promises to teach occultism, she shifted the focus of the Society to one that promoted Universal Brotherhood instead, highlighting notions of the body and demanding the control of emotion as a means to rebuff demands for training. With this refocusing, Blavatsky reestablished control of the Society and asserted herself as the central channel of esoteric knowledge. Thus, by shifting the focus from the attainment of occult powers to the more ambiguous “spiritual enlightenment,” Blavatsky erected an elaborate, centralized system of delayed spiritual gratification, a system contingent upon the individual’s adoption of specific morals and values, while simultaneously maintaining control of the human body on all its levels: spiritual, social, physical, mental, and especially emotional. Introduction During a meeting of the Theosophical Society in New York City on October 18, 1876, the co-founder and legal counsel for the newly established organization, William Quan Judge (1851– 96), gave a lecture about his personal experiences in the study of Theosophy. He spoke about his recent experiences of astrally traveling and implanting his thoughts and ideas into the minds of others. He did this through focusing his will and commanding his “double,” or astral body, to go to these places and influence others.
    [Show full text]
  • Theosophy Is of the Devil by David J
    Theosophy is of the Devil By David J. Stewart I could have just as easily saved this article under "New Age" or "Witchcraft," because there's not a dime's difference between the two. I saved it under "New Age" because the primary agenda of Theosophy is to further the New World Order, i.e., the Beast system of the coming Antichrist. The following historical information concerning Theosophy is a quote from Wikipedia.com... Photo to Right: Occultist and Satan worshipper, Helena Petrovna Blavatsky Theosophy, literally "god-wisdom" (Greek: θεοσοφία theosophia), designates several bodies of ideas. The 6th century neo-platonist Pseudo-Dionysius seems to have been the first philosopher the term applied to. There was a group of Renaissance philosophers: Cornelius Agrippa, Paracelsus, Robert Fludd, and, especially, Jacob Boehme; the Enlightenment theologian Emanuel Swedenborg was influenced by these. And finally, the word was revived in the nineteenth century by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky to designate her religious philosophy which holds that all religions are attempts by humanity to approach the absolute, and that each religion therefore has a portion of the truth. Together with Henry Steel Olcott, William Quan Judge, and others, Blavatsky founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. This society has since split into a number of organizations, some of which no longer use the term "theosophy." SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theosophy Please notice that Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. Her most popular work was a two- volume book she wrote titled 'The Secret Doctrine,' in which she woefully states... "Lucifer represents.. Life.
    [Show full text]
  • Von Aurenforschung Und Reinkarnation - Die Theosophen
    Bernadett Bigalke Von Aurenforschung und Reinkarnation - Die Theosophen Die Glaubensgrundsätze der im 19. Jahrhundert entstandenen —> Theosophie sind von verschiedenen religiösen und philosophischen Systemen beeinflusst worden. Dazu ge­ hörten sowohl der -> Spiritismus, die Astrologie und andere esoterische Traditionen des Westens als auch -> Buddhismus und Hinduismus als östliche Quellen. Die Theo­ sophen waren auf der Suche nach der »verborgenen« Seite der Natur und nach Er­ kenntnis aus »geheimen« religiösen Traditionen. Dabei übersetzten sie ihren Eigen­ namen mit »Gottesweisheit«, verstanden als »wirkliche Theosophie, die nur dadurch entsteht, dass man durch Mystik und Geisteswis­ senschaft das Wesen der Gottheit zu begreifen sucht. Sie entzieht sich jeder profanen Kontrolle, kann ihre Erkenntnisse nicht in Worten ausdrücken. Dazu bedürfte es einer Geistessprache die in Gedanken spricht, wie die seligen Geister.«1 Theosophie in den USA und Indien In ihrer Entstehungszeit profitierte die Theosophie zunächst davon, dass der westliche Spiritismus, das heißt, die Kommunikation mit Geistern und Verstorbenen aus dem Jenseits mittels zumeist weiblicher Medien, in der Öffentlichkeit in starke Kritik gera­ ten war. Vor allen den Medien, die diesen Beruf oder besser ihre »Berufung« haupt­ amtlich ausübten, warfen die Behörden Betrugsversuch und bewusste Verdummung des Volkes vor. So wurde zum Beispiel im Jahr 1903 dem aus Sachsen stammenden Medium Anna Rothe in Berlin der Prozess gemacht, welcher deutschlandweit das Inte­ resse der Öffentlichkeit hervorrief. Die Wissenschaft, vor allem die gerade entstehende moderne Psychologie, wandte sich ebenfalls gegen die Spiritisten. Sie verortete die von den Frauen vernommenen Stimmen nicht im Jenseits, sondern in deren eigenen Köpfen. Den meisten Forschern schien die Möglichkeit einer jenseitigen Welt und des Kontaktes mit ihren Bewohnern geradezu absurd.
    [Show full text]
  • Imagining Macrohistory? Madame Blavatsky from Isis Unveiled (1877) to the Secret Doctrine (1888) Garry W
    Imagining Macrohistory? Madame Blavatsky from Isis Unveiled (1877) to The Secret Doctrine (1888) Garry W. Trompf In Memoriam: Alfred John Cooper1 Introduction The term „macrohistory‟ denotes the envisaging and representation of the human past as a vast panorama, great movements of human activity held „in the mind‟s eye‟ or in a unitary vision. When such broad encompassments also incorporate the pre-human past and even the possible future of everything, then one may refer to cosmological macrohistory (or „cosmo-history‟), or, if the atmosphere of a mythos is strong, to a mythological macrohistory. Many will suspect that mental acts of encapsulation entailed in „doing macrohistory‟ are inevitably unreliable and methodologically inadmissible because the myriad facts to be embraced, both known and unknown, could never be accounted for in any one synoptic view. Certainly the macrohistorical visionary will have to resort to a picturing or imaging through some kind of model, paradigm or diagrammatic procedure, and in almost all cases, a species of meta-history (of a conceptual „framing‟ superimposed on data) will result. In the Judaeo- Christian-Islamic-Marxist trajectory of thought, four primary „idea-frames‟ of macrohistory have stood out. These are, first, progress, or the idea that past events show an overall improvement of things; second and contrarily, regress, the outlook that affairs have steadily worsened; third, recurrence, the apprehension that everything is basically repetitive (if not cyclical); and lastly, the view that nothing can be fully understood without a sense of an utterly final consummation, an eschaton (end) or apokatastasis (restoration of all things) or millennial „showdown‟, as against some limited telos.
    [Show full text]
  • South Asians and the Theosophical Society, 1879-1930 Maria Moritz
    Globalizing “Sacred Knowledge”: South Asians and the Theosophical Society, 1879-1930 by Maria Moritz a Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Approved Dissertation Committee Professor Harald Fischer-Tiné, ETH Zürich Professor Nicola Spakowski, Universität Freiburg Professor Hans Kippenberg, Jacobs University Bremen Professor Sebastian Conrad, Freie Universität Berlin Date of Defense: 23 March 2012 School of Humanities and Social Sciences Statutory Declaration (on Authorship of a Dissertation) I, Maria-Sofia Moritz, hereby declare that I have written this PhD thesis independently, unless where clearly stated otherwise. I have used only the sources, the data and the support that I have clearly mentioned. This PhD thesis has not been submitted for conferral of degree elsewhere. I confirm that no rights of third parties will be infringed by the publication of this thesis. Berlin, April 27, 2017 Signature ___________________________________________________________ Contents Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 4 List of Illustrations ............................................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Theosophy, Culture, and Politics in Honolulu, 1890-1920
    FRANK J. KARPIEL Theosophy, Culture, and Politics in Honolulu, 1890-1920 IN THE HEART OF DOWNTOWN Honolulu lies a verdant twenty-acre public garden containing more than ten thousand species of trees and plants from around the world, a visible symbol of the fact that Hawai'i is a place of biological as well as cultural fusion. The donor of this botanical preserve was Mary Foster (1844-1930), whose life exemplified this fusion of Asian, Pacific, and Western peoples and cultures on this remote island chain. Scion of a wealthy family of Hawaiian and haole ancestry, Foster was one of a number of second- and third-generation Island residents who crossed the cultural boundaries that separated people in Hawai'i. By immersing themselves in syncretic religious movements such as Buddhism and Theosophy, they helped bridge cultural and ethnic divisions in Honolulu during this era and foreshadowed the ethnic and cultural mosaic that Hawai'i became later in the twentieth cen- tury. As a singular alliance of American businessmen, missionary descendants, and their local allies closed in around a weakened monarchy in the early 1890s, seizing control of the economic and political destiny of Hawai'i, a handful of the kama'aina1 elite, among them Mary Foster, abandoned the Christian Protestant creeds of their parents and peers and turned instead to Asian and syncretic religions. Foster and her associates in this move were the predecessors of today's culturally integrated Hawai'i. Yet in their own time they were a tiny minority with little apparent influence. Is there a connection Frank J.
    [Show full text]
  • Theosophy,” Forthcoming In: SAGE Encyclopedia of Sociology of Religion, Adam Possamai & Anthony Blasi (Eds.)
    Egil Asprem, “Theosophy,” forthcoming in: SAGE Encyclopedia of Sociology of Religion, Adam Possamai & Anthony Blasi (eds.) Theosophy Introduction Theosophy refers to a set of ideas and organizations originating with the activities of Russian- born occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831–1891). Embodied in the Theosophical Society, established in New York City in 1875 by Blavatsky, the American military officer and lawyer Henry Steel Olcott (1832–1907), and the Irish-American barrister William Quan Judge (1851–1896), Theosophy attracted tens of thousands of students in the late nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, leaving a number of splinter organizations in its wake. The leading branch of Theosophy moved its headquarters to Adyar in Chennai, India, in 1886; an independent American branch has been associated with the activities of Katherine Tingley (1847–1929), including the theosophical commune Lomaland (1900–1942) in Southern California, and is now known as the Theosophical Society Pasadena. In 1913 Rudolf Steiner (1861–1925) took most of the German membership with him when he broke out of the Theosophical Society Adyar and formed the Anthroposophical Society, which has since spread Waldorf education, biodynamic farming and anthroposophial medicine to hundreds of thousands of people across the world. Theosophically inspired groups have had a remarkable impact on contemporary religiosity, but also on a wide array of political, artistic, and social movements of the past 150 years. To sociologists of religion, Theosophy is particularly important for understanding the transnational exchanges that have transformed the modern religious field, as well as the emergence of “unchurched” religion/spirituality (primarily) among the educated middle classes under the pressures of secularization.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    C. W. Leadbeater: the “Received Tradition” Pedro Oliveira One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system – holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each essential element of the crime charged. Definition from Nolo’s Plain-English Law Dictionary The French include in their French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizens of 1789 stating that ‘every man is presumed innocent until declared guilty’. … Roman law, canon law, the jus commune: from these sources spring that great Anglo- Saxon principle: A person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. (‘Innocent Until Proven Guilty: The Origins of a Legal Maxim’, Kenneth Pennington, The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law, 2003) The foundational legal principle quoted above, although universally recognized and formally adopted, did not apply to Charles Webster Leadbeater (CWL) in his lifetime. At different times in his life serious accusations were made against at him, mostly involving alleged immoral (and reportedly criminal) behaviour towards boys. His accusers were so thoroughly convinced that he was guilty that they communicated this conviction to many others within the Theosophical Society and to the press. And yet, in spite of almost a lifelong campaign of denunciation and defamation he was never charged or prosecuted. But he was ‘proven’ guilty by his accusers and such ‘proof’ became an integral part of almost every biographical rendering of his life. In one of her letters about him to Laura Mead, wife of G. R. S. Mead, Helen I. Dennis, who led the charges against him in her letter to Annie Besant of January 1906, declared that she became aware in 1905 that charges of immoral behaviour against CWL were repeatedly made against him ‘for at least fifteen years’ in India and Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • East Coast Buddhists
    Buddhism East Coast Buddhists East Coast Buddhists Summary: On the East Coast, interest in Buddhism rose in the 1870s through the influence of prominent figures like Henry David Thoreau and H.P. Blavatsky, who founded the Theosophical Society with Henry Steel Olcott. Many of these East Coast Buddhists drew spiritual inspiration from what they considered “exotic” or “ancient” Buddhist texts and ideas. Meanwhile on the East Coast, Buddhist ideas sparked an intellectual conversation among a number of Euro-Americans. In the mid-19th century, Henry David Thoreau is said to have translated part of the Lotus Sutra from French into English. His regard for the Buddha is evident in his essay “A Week on the Concord and Merrimac,” where Thoreau writes: “I know that some will have hard thoughts of me, when they hear their Christ named beside my Buddha, yet I am sure that I am willing they should love their Christ more than my Buddha, for the love is the main thing…” In the 1870s, Edwin Arnold’s famous rendition of the life of the Buddha, The Light of Asia, crossed the Atlantic and became the first Buddhist bestseller in America. Quite a number of intellectuals and spiritually-minded people took a keen interest in Buddhism in the late 19th century. Colonel Henry Steel Olcott, along with Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, founded what they called the Theosophical Society in 1875, “to study ancient and modern religions, philosophies and sciences, and to investigate the unexplained laws of Nature and the psychical powers latent in man.” It was an eclectic band of New Yorkers, with interests in everything from the mysteries of ancient Egypt and Greece to the religions of the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Olcott and Blavatsky: Theosophical Twins an Essay in Archetypes John
    Olcott and Blavatsky: Theosophical Twins An Essay in Archetypes John Algeo We used to speak of ourselves as the Theosophical Twins. [ODL 1.9:141]1 Henry Steel Olcott’s reference to Helena Blavatsky and himself as “Theosophical Twins” has depths that are not immediately apparent. On the surface, it seems to be just a statement that they were alike with respect to Theosophy. However, the expression evokes an archetypal reference as well. These remarks are an essay, or attempt, to explore that evocation by considering four things: first, the nature of archetypes; second, the extent and meaning of the archetype of the Twins; third, how that archetype applies to Olcott and Blavatsky; and finally, how it applies as well to all of us. 1. Archetypes Like much else in Western thought, the concept of archetypes goes back to Plato. Plato posited the existence of ideal forms, of which all the objects of this world are but poor copies or reflections. Plato’s archetypal ideal forms are absolutely real and unchanging. Their reflections in our world are only relatively real and impermanent. Presumably, there is an archetypal tree, of which all oaks, pines, palms, elms, and so on are only partial and imperfect reflections. However different those particular trees may seem from one another, they all share the quality of “treeness.” Those particular varieties of trees are all types of the archetype of the Tree. Plato’s theory of archetypes relates to, and may have developed from, his concern with analyzing language to discover Truth. If we talk about trees—and if we group oaks, pines, palms, elms, etc.
    [Show full text]