DOCSLIB.ORG

Surface Freight Transportation in Mexico Post NAFTA Richard L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Surface Freight Transportation in Mexico Post NAFTA Richard L Journal of Transportation Management Volume 14 | Issue 1 Article 4 4-1-2003 Surface freight transportation in Mexico post NAFTA Richard L. Clarke Clemson University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/jotm Part of the Operations and Supply Chain Management Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Richard L. (2003). Surface freight transportation in Mexico post NAFTA. Journal of Transportation Management, 14(1), 14-21. doi: 10.22237/jotm/1049155380 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Transportation Management by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@WayneState. SURFACE FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION IN MEXICO POST NAFTA Richard L. Clarke Clemson University One of the significant expressed objectives of NAFTA was the improvement of cross-border transportation to enable a more efficient and cost effective flow of goods among Mexico, Canada and the United States. This article examines the changes that have taken place in surface freight transportation between Mexico and the U.S. since NAFTA was signed in 1993. INTRODUCTION been little improvement in the cross-border movement of goods between Mexico and the One of the major expressed objectives of the 1993 United States. North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was to facilitate the cross-border movement of Commercial truck movements into each goods and services between the territories of country’s interior remain a time-consuming, Canada, Mexico and the United States. Another inconvenient process, largely unchanged since objective was to increase trade among the three 1990. Neither country yet allows foreign countries by removing tariffs, quotas and other trucking beyond a twenty-mile commercial zone. trade restrictions. A review of the increases in As a result, the promised benefits of improved trade volume since 1993 provides ample evidence transportation, such as faster transit times, that the later objective has been achieved. For reduced pipeline inventories and better example, the number of commercial trucks reliability of shipment delivery, have not yet carrying U.S. exports to Mexico increased over been realized. While cross border movement of 407% from 1990 to 2000 while the number of goods remains as cumbersome, inefficient and trucks transporting Mexican exports to the U.S. unpredictable as it was prior to NAFTA, there increased 328% over the same period. There have been several significant improvements in were a reported 2.26 million commercial truck Mexico’s transportation infrastructure since crossings into Mexico from Texas in 2000 and NAFTA’s passage. The purpose of this article is another 2.38 million truck crossings from Mexico two fold: to examine the progress Mexico has into Texas (TAMIU, 2002). In the same report, made in modernizing its rail and highway the Texas Center for Border Economic and transportation modes and to outline the reasons Enterprise Development, reported the number of why there has not been much improvement in freight railcars transporting goods into Mexico the cross-border flow of goods between the U.S. more than doubled from 1993 to 2000 from and Mexico. This article also reviews major 147,216 to 298,919 (TAMIU, 2002). However, in economic policy changes in Mexico and makes the ten years since NAFTA’s passage there has recommendations on how Mexico and the United 14 Journal of Transportation Management States might achieve a better flow of goods four years the three TFM partners have been the across their shared border. U.S.-based Kansas City Southern Industries Corporation (37%), its Mexican affiliate, RAIL IMPROVEMENTS IN MEXICO TMM/Grupo Service (38.5%) and the Mexican government (24.5%). By law, Mexico’s four Privatization privatized rail systems must be at least 51% owned by Mexican-based investors, which has Ferrocarriles Nacionales de Mexico (FNM), required U.S. investors to find Mexican partners. Mexico’s national railroad, was established in The privatization of all four parts of the FNM 1873. It was owned and operated by the central was completed last year under this ownership government of Mexico from 1937-1994. Over the rule. course of this 57-year period, Mexico’s rail system suffered from neglect and severe lack of The second rail freight system to become capital funding (Barrera, 1999). As a result, privatized was the Ferrocarril line, a 4,052-mile Mexico’s national railroad became slow, Pacific-North line and the 938 mile Ojenaga- unreliable and highly inefficient. The lack of Topolobampo railroad. The new owner is Grupo required track replacement and track Ferroviacio Mexicano Mexican Railways, a newly maintenance caused frequent derailments. By formed alliance of two large Mexican companies 1980, 75 per cent of Mexico’s existing track dated and the U.S.-based Union Pacific Corporation. back to pre-revolution days before 1910 (Barrera, The Ferrocarril line connects Calexico, California 1999). Train robberies by organized gangs of and El Paso, Eagle Pass and Brownsville, Texas armed bandits were also commonplace during (House, 1999). this period. Approximately one in every five trains was boarded and robbed as recently as the A third section, the 1,000-mile Southeast section, late 1980’s (Kaufman, 2001). is now owned by a group of Mexican investors. The Southeast Railroad connects Mexico City Beginning in 1994, the Mexican government with several important ports along the Gulf began to address the need for significant coast including Veracruz and Coatzacoalcos. improvement in its freight rail system by This line has the lowest revenues currently but deciding to privatize the entire 16,500-mile the highest growth potential because it links network. In the same year, the first of FNM’s several of Mexico’s busiest seaports. Railcars are three major railway regions was sold to the currently being ferried between Coatzacoalcos Transportation Ferroviaria Mexicana (TFM) and Mobile, Alabama by Gulflink Marine. There consortium for $1.4 billion. TFM’s winning bid is also reported interest in the Southeast line by gave TFM partners the right to operate the the Canadian National (CN) Railroad. With its 2,661-mile Northeast system for 50 years with recent acquisition of the Illinois Central an option for an additional 50 years (Vantuono, Railroad, CN currently provides cross-border 1999). TFM’s line is the most important of the service between Canada and the U.S. and has major FNM (Ferrocarril del Noreste) rail regions routes to the Mexican border (Kaufman, 2001). because it provides the primary rail route in Northern Mexico and links the industrial areas Improvements Since 1994 of Mexico City and Monterey with the United States at Laredo, Texas. Approximately 60% of With privatization has come a much needed all the trade between Mexico and the United infusion of capital to replace obsolete rolling States crosses the border at Laredo/Nuevo stock, buy new locomotives, repair and upgrade Laredo (TAMIU, 2002). Although the Northeast track and install computerized control systems. system controls less than 19% of the total Most of the improvements have been to the Mexican trackage it moves 40% of Mexico’s Northeast section owned by TFM and domestic freight (Vantuono, 1999). For the past underwritten with capital provided by Kansas Spring 2003 15 City Southern Industries. TFM spent $90 Products moving by train from the U.S. to million for infrastructure improvements within Mexico’s interior can now be moved on a single a year of winning the operating bid and another through bill of lading. Formerly, rail shipments $600 million by the end of 2001 (KCSI, 2002). from the U.S. into Mexico had to be rebilled at The money has gone to purchase over 2,800 new the border, which was often a very time- pieces of rolling stock, and 150 new locomotives. consuming process. Railcars must still be TFM has also negotiated a new labor agreement, switched to Mexican locomotives at the border rebuilt the main line between Mexico City and but since the operations are now frequently Laredo, built a new service center and a new under the control of the same company, the computerized railroad operation center (KCSI, switching is much more efficient than it was 2002). The investment appears to be paying off, before rail privatization (House, 1999). at least as of year ending in December 1999 versus the previous year. The 1999 revenue Remaining Problems in from railroad operations was $524.5 million, an Cross Border Rail Freight increase of 22 percent over 1998 while the operation ratio improved from 85.5% to 76.6% Incompatibilities in the customs clearance (KCSI, 2002). procedures between the United States and Mexico remain, even though the new railroads Mexican Railways has also invested heavily in have built customs processing yards to facilitate infrastructure movements to improve their clearance. Both the TFM Railroad and Mexican 4,052-mile rail network. By the end of 1999, Railways have built processing yards several they had spent nearly $400 million to rebuild miles from the main border crossing at Nuevo track, build new sidings and modernize their Laredo, but the railroads are only capable of fleet of railcars (Kaufman, 2001). Both new improving processes under their control. The major system owners have also beefed up governments of the United States and Mexico security. Mexican railways has hired 1600 have done little to reduce the paperwork and security officers, put up new fences and lighting bureaucracy inherent in the customs clearing and covered all railcar hatch covers with process (Ross, 2001). One improvement would be fiberglass. TFM has hired over 1000 security to make the shipper of record the company with personnel, reducing the number of train whom customs officials deal, not the railroad or robberies (House, 1999). As a result, train theft the freight-forwarder.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Investment in Mexico: a Springboard Toward the NAFTA Market - an Asian Perspective
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 22 Number 1 Article 3 Fall 1996 Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective Chiana-Feng Lin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Chiana-Feng Lin, Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective, 22 N.C. J. INT'L L. 73 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol22/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This article is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol22/ iss1/3 Investmentt in Mexico: A Springboard toward The NAFTA Market-An Asian Perspective Chiang-feng Lin Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................... 74 II. Mexico: A Country in the Process of Revival ................... 77 A. Macroeconomic Adjustments ...................................... 77 1. Inflation .................................................................. 77 2. Trade Liberalization ............................................... 78 3. Peso
    [Show full text]
  • Ride Fair: a Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies
    Ride Fair: A Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies MARCH 2019 AUTHORS FROM ITDP Dana Yanocha, Senior Research Associate Jacob Mason, Director of Research and Impact CONTRIBUTORS Aimee Gauthier, Chief Knowledge Officer, ITDP Karina Licea, Mobility and Tech Specialist Diego Silva, Travel Demand Management Coordinator, ITDP Brazil ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge and thank the following experts for their assistance and feedback in the creation of this report: Bernardo Baranda, Regional Director for Latin America, ITDP Shreya Gadepalli, Regional Director South Asia, ITDP Santiago Fernandez Reyez, Urban Development Coordinator, ITDP Mexico Shanshan Li, Vice Country Director, ITDP China Rahul Madhusudanan, ITDP India Gonzalo Peon, Deputy Director, ITDP Mexico Bernardo Serra, Public Policy Coordinator, ITDP Brazil Jaime Aparicio, Laura Ballesteros, Kayli Cappucci, Miguel Abad Carillo, Drew Cooper, Warren Logan, Ramon Escobar, Onesimo Flores, Yolisa Kani, Juliana Minorello, Renato Picard and Rufino Leon Tovar. CONTENT 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 10 Methodology 11 Decision-Making Framework 13 Critical Regulatory Elements 23 Structural Barriers and Recommendations 31 Discussion & Next Steps 33 Appendix A: Case Study—Mexico City, Mexico 39 Appendix B: Case Study—São Paulo, Brazil 46 Appendix C: Case Study—Chicago, USA 50 Appendix D: Case Study—London, United Kingdom 54 Appendix E: Informational Interviews 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT ARE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES? Defined as digital applications that match potential riders with drivers in real time, transportation network companies (TNCs) have been characterized by their ability to “disrupt,” forcing cities around the world to respond to a range of public concerns, plan for unknowns, and adapt to constantly evolving technologies, business models, and growing demands for flexible mobility options.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Public Transport Improvements in Mexico: Analysis of the Influence of Private Bus Operators in the Planning Process
    Planning Public Transport Improvements in Mexico: Analysis of the Influence of Private Bus Operators in the Planning Process by Abel Lopez Dodero A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 ©Abel Lopez Dodero 2013 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract In Mexico, transportation planning deals with unique social, political, financial and cultural elements when promoting mobility solutions. These elements include the opportunity costs of public investments, institutional barriers and changes in the political agenda. Other important element is the influence of existing private bus operator. Bus provision is offered by a disproportionate number of small private enterprises, single concessionaries and unregulated providers. Today, many of these entities have gained political power and, often, resist attempts to improve public transportation. The recommended solution to overcome political problem created from the opposition from private providers includes the introduction of franchise systems. Franchising systems under strict institutional regulations support the incorporation of current private providers in the proposed projects. However, incorporating bus operators into any form of system under franchise system implies major changes in private providers’ business and routines. Franchising implies moving from concession-owner-driver to simple employee or shareholder of the new system. Franchising also results in having to change routines associated with the operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Freight Transport in Mexico: Production and Employment Autotransporte De Carga En México: Producción Y Empleo
    Análisis Económico, vol. XXXV, núm. 90, septiembre-diciembre de 2020, pp. 147-172, ISSN: 0185-3937, e- ISSN: 2448-6655 Road freight transport in Mexico: production and employment Autotransporte de carga en México: producción y empleo (Received: 16/April/2020; accepted: 09/July/2020; published: 04/September/2020) Luis David Berrones-Sanz* ABSTRACT Road freight transport is the main way of transportation in Mexico; besides it moves the 83.2% of domestic tonnage, it contributes with the 3.96% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and generates 2.73% of employment nationwide. Moreover, it’s contextualized under a business structure conformed by 152,487 companies, where 97.2% are classified as micro (89.7%) or small companies (16.5%) and that together possess 53% (n=522,221) of the vehicles, that average a seventeen-year-old antiquity. The GDP analysis and the subsector employment show that despite that the number of employed personnel in the road freight transport have a correlation coefficient of 0.99 with Nacional GDP and with the GDP of road freight transport the number of drivers has not increased (AAGR=0.31%) at the same rhythm as the GDP of road freight transport (AAGR=0.97%), and that the National GDP (AAGR=1.36%) of the last years (2008-2013) resulting in an over 80,000 driver scarcity: this despite that this workgroup has relatively higher incomes than the average of workers and in a national context where there is a lack of job opportunities. However, the output elasticity of employment in the last lustrum is Ꜫ15-19=1.009, and the evidence shows that despite the economic situation of 2020 and the reduction of production there will not be any reduction in the number of drivers in the road freight transportation area (Ꜫ19-20=0.94) and, as a result, it seems that they will not have unemployment risks.
    [Show full text]
  • La Entrada Al Pacifico Planning Study-TTI-12-7-04
    LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY Prepared for: Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization and Texas Department of Transportation – Odessa District Prepared by: Texas Transportation Institute December 2004 LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY by by William E. Frawley, AICP Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute John Overman, AICP Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute Juan Villa Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute and Ajay Shakyaver, P.E. Advanced Transportation Planning Engineer Texas Department of Transportation Project Title: Provide Technical Assistance Related to a Future National Corridor Planning and Development Study for the “La Entrada al Pacifico” Trade Corridor for the Midland-Odessa MPO December 2004 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank the project director, Robert Cox, of the Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the following individuals for their valuable assistance and input: Lauren Garduno – Texas Department of Transportation James Beauchamp – Midland-Odessa Transportation Alliance In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Claire Fazio of the Texas Transportation Insitute (TTI) for her work on maps and graphics, Edd Sepulveda of TTI for his statistical work, Lisa Day of TTI for her work on graphics, and Carol Court for her editorial work.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights of Transportation & Logistics Sector in Mexico
    www.pwc.com/mx Insights of Transportation Selected information about the Transportation & Logistics & Logistics Sector in Mexico Sector in Mexico September 2014 www.pwc.com/mx Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Mexico in the Global Context 4 Transportation in Mexico 5 Road Transportation 5 Railway Transportation 6 Water Transportation 7 Air Transportation 8 Pipeline Transportation 9 Cable Transportation 9 Logistics in Mexico 10 Logistics Parks 11 Mexican’s Transport & Communications Investment Program 2013-2018 12 Forecast 13 Knowledge Center Mexico 14 Executive Summary The challenges from the economic globalization and trade openness make competitiveness more pressing for Mexico. One of the keys to position the country as a global trade leader over the coming decade is the development of an international logistics capability that joins production, cost, quality and customer service to provide an integrated supply chain, indispensable to new business and trade practices. Mexico has positioned itself as an attractive location for productive investment, something that has favored the recent increase in advanced manufacturing industries based in the country, such as aerospace, automotive, electronics, medical and food processing, among others. That has further encouraged investment in multi- modal transport corridors comprising inland ports, industrial parks and free trade zones in order to develop Mexico as a logistics platform and link it to world markets. In most recent years, Mexico prepared a very ambitious infrastructure program in history, building and modernizing a 133,000 kilometer network of highways, 76 airports (64 with international flights), and 27,000 kilometers of railroad and 117 maritime ports – of which 68 are containers ports.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban and Suburban Transport in Mexico City
    Urban and suburban transport in Mexico City: Lessons learned implementing BRTs lines and suburban railways for the first time. Prepared for the Roundtable on Integrated Transport Development Experiences Of Global City Clusters (originally prepared as Paper 2 in the NYU Marron Institute of Urban Management Working Paper series) (2-3 July 2015, Beijing China) Sebastián VARELA Cities and Transport Associate at WRI Ross Center for Sustainable Cities. World Resources Institute June 2015 THE INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 57 member countries. It acts as a strategic think-tank, with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Morocco, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • TIPS for PARTICIPANTS Regional Conference on Child and Adolescent Indicators September 6-7
    TIPS FOR PARTICIPANTS Regional Conference on Child and Adolescent Indicators September 6-7. Mexico, City. Version: 16/08/2011 o Venue Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Room Jose María Morelos y Pavón Plaza Juárez No. 20, piso 1. Col Centro, C.P. 06010, Del. Cuauhtémoc, México, D. F. Phone: (52 55) 3686 – 5100 o Hotel Accommodations HILTON MEXICO CITY REFORMA Avenida Juárez No. 70, Col. Centro C.P. 06010 Phone: (52 55) 5130 – 5252 Calls from abroad: 0018005140160 Contact: [email protected] http://mexicocityreforma.hilton.com Rate single room: USD 129/MXP 1,529.94 (taxes included) Rate single room: USD148/MXP 1,755.28 (taxes and breakfast included) Group Code: GRPUNI 1 For reservations please access this link: http://www.hilton.com/en/hi/groups/personalized/M/MEXRFHH-GRPUNI- 20110905/index.jhtml?WT.mc_id=POG FIESTA INN CENTRO HISTÓRICO Avenida Juárez No. 76, Col. Centro, C.P. 06010 Phone: (52 55) 5130 -2907 Contact: [email protected] Rate Single Room USD 89/MXP 1,066.50 (taxes, tips and breakfast included) Group code for reservations: GR2PG HOTEL MELIA MÉXICO REFORMA Paseo de la Reforma, 1 C.P. 06030, México D.F. Reservations phone: 01-800-90-MELIA Group code: 340037 Rate Single Room USD 115/MXP 1,380 plus Tax (*Note: Tax exemption is applicable only when showing copy of a foreign Passport, migration form and paying with a credit card from a foreign bank or a deposit from a foreign bank). HOTEL MARLOWE Av. Independencia No. 17 Col. Centro C.P. 06050 Contact: Gabriela Licona, Phone: (52 55) 55-21-95-40 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.hotelmarlowe.com.mx Rate single room USD 44/ MXP 530 (taxes and breakfast included) o Transportation from the Airport to the Hotel It is recommended to use only the authorized taxi services (check the logos provided below), they are normally yellow and white.
    [Show full text]
  • A GEOGRAPHIC STUDY of the TOURIST INDUSTRY of MEXICO by 1957. MASTER of SCIENCE
    A GEOGRAPHIC STUDY OF THE TOURIST INDUSTRY OF MEXICO By WILLIAM Mo BRYAN ';}".~ Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College Stillwater i, Oklahoma 1957. Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma State University of Agriculture and Applied Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August, 1957 ? .• OKlAHOMk\ STATE UN1VER,SFt•·..t " lf8RARY " OCT 1 1957 A GEOGRAPHIC ·STUDY OF ' THE TOURIST INDUSTRY OF MEXICO Thesis Approved: > Dean of the Graduate School 385416 ii PREFACE American citizens do not visualize tourism as a complete industryo They think of the hotel., restaurant 9 souvenir.I) transportation9 garage and filling stations 9 and sporting goods businesses as individual enterprises rather than one large combined industryo Our demooracy 9 high economic standards 9 and liberal wa:y of life allow the American a:i tizen much time to spend in travel. An over~all look at tourism in one country 9 Mexico.I) has shown me that a large number of enterprisers are interested in this industryll and that country's government goes to great lengths to promote and build up a good tourist trade. While in the United States Navy, I first noticed the great impact of tourism in foreign lands., especially Hawaiio I became interested in Mexico while working in San Antonio., Texaso While there., several trips were made to border towns., and the large tourist trade between the United States and Mexico was realizedo A background in geography has given me a deeper knowledge of Mexi~oj and a reconn.aissanoe trip to that country provided the incentive to make this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Policy Review of Mexico Tourism Policy Review of Mexico of Review Policy Tourism
    OECD Studies on Tourism OECD Studies on Tourism Tourism Policy Review of Mexico Tourism Policy Review of Mexico OECD Studies on Tourism Tourism Policy Review of Mexico This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Please cite this publication as: OECD (2017), Tourism Policy Review of Mexico, OECD Studies on Tourism, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266575-en ISBN 978-92-64-26656-8 (print) ISBN 978-92-64-26657-5 (PDF) Series: OECD Studies on Tourism ISSN 2223-9790 (print) ISSN 2223-9804 (online) Photo credits: Cover © vectomart/Shutterstock.com Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm. © OECD 2017 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Suburban Transit in Mexico City
    SUBURBAN TRANSIT IN MEXICO CITY ERICK GUERRA ver the past decade, governments and development agencies have invested significantly in high-capacity transit in Asian, Latin American, and African Ocities. Beijing’s subway system grew from just two lines in 2000 to one of the world’s largest metro systems today. Each year, a dozen new Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) lines open in cities around the world. Concerns about economic competitiveness, congestion, sprawl, pollution, and accessibility for the poor and middle class motivate these investments. Despite increased high-capacity transit investment in many developing-world cities, little research has evaluated its effects on land use or travel behavior, particularly in fast- growing suburban neighborhoods. Yet the effects of transit investments almost certainly vary in areas with different spatial patterns, land use regulations, travel habits, and income levels. Most existing studies are either descriptive or recommend a specific technology— generally BRT—based on costs and passenger volumes. Several studies focus on factors that influence households’ mode choice on existing systems, and the relationship between proximity to transit and land values. As in other metropolitan areas, Mexico City’s population has grown primarily in suburban neighborhoods, far from metro or BRT stations. Despite limited transit service, Mexico City’s suburban residents use transit for a higher share of trips than central city residents. Suburban households rely on a combination of privately owned and operated minivans and minibuses and publicly owned metro and buses. When Mexico City Metro’s Line B opened in 1999, it significantly expanded high-capacity transit into the large and densely populated suburban municipality of Ecatepec.
    [Show full text]
  • Information on How to Get the Permit to Operate in Mexico from the United States of America and Canada Under the North American
    Information on how to get the Permit to operate in Mexico from the United States of America and Canada Under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) provisions Mexico, USA and Canada allow international trucking services, for cargo transportation. The Federal Motor Carrier Transportation General Directorate (Dirección General de Autotransporte Federal) of the Secretariat of Communications and Transportation (Secretaría de Comunicaciones y Transportes) (SCT-DGAF) provides permits to carriers from USA and Canada to allow international trucking services, which comply with the requirements established in Mexico. What the Permit authorizes? The Permit authorizes the provision of international trucking services in Mexico, however does not allow the services of passenger transportation, Hazmates, or domestic or intra Mexico (cabotage) services. Applying for the Permit Carriers can process the Permits, plates, cab cards and stickers, at the Metropolitan Center (Dirección de Trámites de Servicios de Autotransporte Federal, Centro Metropolitano) located in Calzada de las Bombas número 411, cuarto piso, Colonia Los Girasoles Coapa, CP. 04920, Ciudad de México) of DGAF-SCT. Application steps 1. Send an E-mail to the following contacts showing your interest in providing international trucking services in Mexico. Salvador Monroy Andrade Director, Cross Border Motor Carrier Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Transportation General Directorate E-mail: [email protected] Carolina Coraza Salazar Cross Border Motor Carrier Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Transportation General Directorate E-mail: [email protected] Pablo Josué Machuca Estévez Cross Border Motor Carrier Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Transportation General Directorate E-mail: [email protected] Phone: + (52) (55) 5011 9209 2. The SCT-DGAF will then send an E-mail, with a link to SIAF site (Sistema Institucional de Autotransporte Federal), to further provide Company’s information and vehicle data.
    [Show full text]