DOCSLIB.ORG

An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, October 2009 Implementation, and Construction Processes 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-10/0-5985-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, October 2009 Implementation, and Construction Processes 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lisa Loftus-Otway, Nathan Hutson, Alejandra Cruz-Ross, 0-5985-1 Rachel Niven, Leigh B. Boske, Jolanda P. Prozzi 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5985-1 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical report, September 1, 2007 – Research and Technology Implementation Office October 30, 2009. P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract This research examined the legal, financial, institutional and policy processes that Mexico uses to plan, finance, construct, and implement its transportation network. It documents through twelve case studies the state of the practice in planning, financing, conducting traffic and revenue studies, cost benefit analysis, and environmental assessments and reviews how right-of-way purchase occurs for multimodal transportation infrastructure projects. It was found that Mexico is aggressively targeting infrastructure development as a mechanism to improve countrywide network and modal connectivity and to redress social and economic inequality that had occurred because of the poor transportation network. The 2007 National Infrastructure Plan covers 5 years and multiple modes and will finance approximately 58% of the projects using innovative finance methods and public private partnerships. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Mexico transportation planning, Mexico No restrictions. This document is available to the transportation finance, Mexico’s transportation public through the National Technical Information infrastructure, 2007-2012 National Infrastructure Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161; www.ntis.gov. Plan, public private partnerships, highways, commuter rail, ports, airports, inland ports and border panning 19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 180 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, Implementation, and Construction Processes Lisa Loftus-Otway Nathan Hutson Alejandra Cruz-Ross Rachel Niven Leigh B. Boske Jolanda Prozzi CTR Technical Report: 0-5985-1 Report Date: October 2009 Project: 0-5985 Project Title: An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance and Implementation Processes Sponsoring Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Performing Agency: Center for Transportation Research at The University of Texas at Austin Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River Austin, TX 78705 www.utexas.edu/research/ctr Copyright (c) 2009 Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America iv Disclaimers Author's Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Patent Disclaimer: There was no invention or discovery conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under this contract, including any art, method, process, machine manufacture, design or composition of matter, or any new useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States of America or any foreign country. Engineering Disclaimer NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. Research Supervisor: Jolanda Prozzi P. E. Designation: Research Supervisor v Acknowledgments The authors express appreciation to: the TxDOT Project Director Eduardo Calvo - Advance Transportation Planning Director of El Paso District- TxDOT, and Duncan Stewart P.E., Ph.D., and Sylvia Medina of the Research and Technology Implementation Office at TxDOT. The members of the Project Monitoring Committee, Agustin de la Rosa, Esther Hitzfelder, Leocadio Matias, Manuela Ortiz, and Sasha Russell in TxDOTs International Office; Christin Longoria and Roberto Rodriguez in the Laredo District, Marty Boyd and Efrain Esparza in El Paso District, Joseph Leal in Pharr District and Orlando Jamadre Jr. in the Multimodal Division. This project could also not have been undertaken without the generous assistance, contributions, and time given by many public and private sector groups in Mexico and the U.S. Specifically Oscar de Buen Richkarday Infrastructure Deputy Secretary, Bernardo José Ortiz Mantilla, Coordinator of Special Projects at SCT and Manuel Cuan Chin Yu, Subdirector de Asuntos Internacionales e Intersecretariales Coordinación Técnica de Planeación de Infraestructura Carretera, SCT, D.F. Mexico; who assisted with case study selection and who graciously set up many initial meetings. We also want to thank the following organizations who graciously participated in the project and whose staff shared their invaluable insights: AGM Enterprises Servicios; Altamira Terminal Portuaria, Altamira, Mexico; API Altamira, Altamira, Mexico; API Lázaro Cárdenas, Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexico; API Manzanillo, Manzanillo, Mexico; Brownsville and Matamoros Bridge Company, Brownsville, Texas; Brownsville and Rio Grande International Railroad, Brownsville, Texas; Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, Fort Worth, Texas; , Cal y Mayor Associates; Cameron County, Brownsville, Texas; Centro de Transporte Sustenable de México, D.F., Mexico; Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental, D.F. Mexico; Cruces y Puentes Internacionales (CPI), D.F. Mexico; DIRAC, Circuito Exterior Mexiquense; Felipe Ochoa Associates, D.F., Mexico; Ferrocarilles Suburbanos S.A. de C.V., D.F., Mexico; Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Secretaría Seguridad Pública, Mexico; INDAABIN; Kansas City Southern de México Railroad, Mexico; Mexico Transportación Ejecutiva y Turística, Mexico; North American Super Corridor Organization, Dallas, Texas; NEMEX-TEX Partnership; OMA Aeropuerto de Monterrey Nuevo León, Mexico; Port of Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas; Reynosa Anzaldúas Bridge, Tamaulipas, Mexico; SSA Mexico; Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico City, Mexico; Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores Mexico City, Mexico; Secretaría de Transportes y Vialidad, Hidalgo, Mexico; State of San Luis Potosí; State of Monterrey; State of Nuevo León; Sumar Sinergia S.A. de C.V.; U.S. Commercial Service, D.F. Mexico. Finally this project could not have been completed without the assistance and work of our first year graduate assistant Cesar Medina and the LBJ School of Public Policy’s PRP Group which comprised the following graduate students: Edmund Gordon, María Fernanda Gutiérrez Pita Padilla, Kate Mason, Jamie L. McAllister, Angela Mora, Caitlin Morris, Rachel Niven, Lauren Rose, Beatriz Rutzen, Sameen Siddiqi, Laura F. Tibbitt, Rebecca Takahashi, Ernest Worley, Zhixing Zhang and Mengying Zhao. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2. Statutory Processes for Transportation Development ........................................... 5 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Legal Authority for Transportation Development .................................................................6 2.2.1 Strategic and Priority Activities ..................................................................................... 6 Highway Network ............................................................................................................... 7 Railroads ............................................................................................................................. 7 Ports .................................................................................................................................... 7 Airports ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Environmental Regulation of Transportation Projects................................................... 8 2.2.3 Foreign Investment ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2.4 Role of International Treaties and Cooperation Arrangements ..................................... 9 2.3 Planning of Transportation Infrastructure ..............................................................................9 2.3.2 Agencies Involved in National and International Transportation Planning
Recommended publications
  • The Perspectives of Men in Mexico City About Vasectomy

    The Perspectives of Men in Mexico City About Vasectomy

    Report THE PERSPECTIVES OF MEN IN MEXICO CITY ABOUT VASECTOMY 2018 13 MAY TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 2 Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Global Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH)................................................................................ 4 In Mexico ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Objective of the Study ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Study population .................................................................................................................................. 5 Survey instrument ................................................................................................................................ 5 Results .....................................................................................................................................................
  • Mexico's Economic Competitiveness Strategy at a Geopolitical Inflection

    Mexico's Economic Competitiveness Strategy at a Geopolitical Inflection

    A NEW ADMINISTRATION CONFRONTS A CHANGING WORLD: MEXICO’S ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY AT A GEOPOLITICAL INFLECTION POINT CHRISTOPHER WILSON GOVERNANCE | MAY 2019 A NEW ADMINISTRATION CONFRONTS A CHANGING WORLD: MEXICO’S ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS STRATEGY AT A GEOPOLITICAL INFLECTION POINT CHRISTOPHER WILSON EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Some three decades ago, Mexico made a bet on the global economy, and at a time when populism and protectionism are on the rise, the payoff is at risk. In response, Mexico must double down on its openness while addressing the critical structural problems, including corruption and inequality, that inhibit its domestic economy and led to the sweeping electoral victory of President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) in 2018. This essay reviews Mexico’s economic progress and the challenges ahead as a new administration takes office at a time of significant stress on regional and global economic institutions. For more than a half-century following the Mexican Revolution, the country’s foreign policy was based on the principal of noninterventionism, a not so subtle way of telling the United States and others not to meddle in Mexico’s domestic affairs. The economic equivalent was Mexico’s policy of import substitution, which raised tariffs and barriers to foreign investment designed to protect the country’s domestic industries from international competition. The two combined to make Mexico an insular country, and despite the significant economic expansion achieved in the decades following World War II, by the 1970s, Mexico’s economy and politics were showing signs of strain. In the following decade, Mexico’s relationship with the world was flipped on its head.
  • Investment in Mexico: a Springboard Toward the NAFTA Market - an Asian Perspective

    Investment in Mexico: a Springboard Toward the NAFTA Market - an Asian Perspective

    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 22 Number 1 Article 3 Fall 1996 Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective Chiana-Feng Lin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Chiana-Feng Lin, Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective, 22 N.C. J. INT'L L. 73 (1996). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol22/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investment in Mexico: A Springboard toward the NAFTA Market - An Asian Perspective Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This article is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol22/ iss1/3 Investmentt in Mexico: A Springboard toward The NAFTA Market-An Asian Perspective Chiang-feng Lin Table of Contents I. Introduction ......................................................................... 74 II. Mexico: A Country in the Process of Revival ................... 77 A. Macroeconomic Adjustments ...................................... 77 1. Inflation .................................................................. 77 2. Trade Liberalization ............................................... 78 3. Peso
  • Ride Fair: a Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies

    Ride Fair: a Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies

    Ride Fair: A Policy Framework for Managing Transportation Network Companies MARCH 2019 AUTHORS FROM ITDP Dana Yanocha, Senior Research Associate Jacob Mason, Director of Research and Impact CONTRIBUTORS Aimee Gauthier, Chief Knowledge Officer, ITDP Karina Licea, Mobility and Tech Specialist Diego Silva, Travel Demand Management Coordinator, ITDP Brazil ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to acknowledge and thank the following experts for their assistance and feedback in the creation of this report: Bernardo Baranda, Regional Director for Latin America, ITDP Shreya Gadepalli, Regional Director South Asia, ITDP Santiago Fernandez Reyez, Urban Development Coordinator, ITDP Mexico Shanshan Li, Vice Country Director, ITDP China Rahul Madhusudanan, ITDP India Gonzalo Peon, Deputy Director, ITDP Mexico Bernardo Serra, Public Policy Coordinator, ITDP Brazil Jaime Aparicio, Laura Ballesteros, Kayli Cappucci, Miguel Abad Carillo, Drew Cooper, Warren Logan, Ramon Escobar, Onesimo Flores, Yolisa Kani, Juliana Minorello, Renato Picard and Rufino Leon Tovar. CONTENT 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 10 Methodology 11 Decision-Making Framework 13 Critical Regulatory Elements 23 Structural Barriers and Recommendations 31 Discussion & Next Steps 33 Appendix A: Case Study—Mexico City, Mexico 39 Appendix B: Case Study—São Paulo, Brazil 46 Appendix C: Case Study—Chicago, USA 50 Appendix D: Case Study—London, United Kingdom 54 Appendix E: Informational Interviews 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY WHAT ARE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES? Defined as digital applications that match potential riders with drivers in real time, transportation network companies (TNCs) have been characterized by their ability to “disrupt,” forcing cities around the world to respond to a range of public concerns, plan for unknowns, and adapt to constantly evolving technologies, business models, and growing demands for flexible mobility options.
  • Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in Mexico

    Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in Mexico

    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Public Health Faculty Publications School of Public Health 5-24-2011 Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in Mexico Gerardo Chowell Georgia State University, [email protected] Santiago Echevarria-Zuno Direccio´n de Prestaciones Me´dicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City Cecile Viboud Division of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America Lone Simonsen Division of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America James Tamerius University of Arizona See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/iph_facpub Part of the Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Chowell G, Echevarrı´a-Zuno S, Viboud C, Simonsen L, Tamerius J, et al. (2011) Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 andemicP in Mexico. PLoS Med 8(5): e1000436. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000436 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Public Health at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Health Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Gerardo Chowell, Santiago Echevarria-Zuno, Cecile Viboud, Lone Simonsen, James Tamerius, Mark Miller, and Victor H. Borja-Aburto This article is available at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/iph_facpub/93 Characterizing the Epidemiology of the 2009 Influenza A/H1N1 Pandemic in Mexico Gerardo Chowell1,2*, Santiago Echevarrı´a-Zuno3,Ce´cile Viboud2, Lone Simonsen2,4, James Tamerius2,5, Mark A.
  • Organised Crime and State Sovereignty

    Organised Crime and State Sovereignty

    Organised Crime and State Sovereignty The conflict between the Mexican state and drug cartels 2006-2011 Jelena Damnjanovic Honours IV 2011 Department of Government and International Relations The University of Sydney Word Count: 19,373 Student ID: 308171594 This work is substantially my own, and where any part of this work is not my own, I have indicated this by acknowledging the source of that part or those parts of the work. Abstract Since December 2006, the government of Mexico has been embroiled in a battle against numerous criminal organisations seeking to control territory and assure continued flow of revenue through the production and trafficking of drugs. Although this struggle has been well documented in Mexican and international media, it has not received as much scholarly attention due to the difficulties involved with assessing current phenomena. This thesis seeks to play a small part in filling that gap by exploring how and why the drug cartels in Mexico have proved a challenge to Mexico’s domestic sovereignty and the state’s capacity to have monopoly over the use of force, maintain effective and legitimate law enforcement, and to exercise control over its territory. The thesis will explain how the violence, corruption and subversion of the state’s authority have resulted in a shift of the dynamics of power from state agents to criminal organizations in Mexico. It also suggests implications for domestic sovereignty in regions experiencing similar problems with organized crime, perhaps pointing to a wider trend in international
  • Planning Public Transport Improvements in Mexico: Analysis of the Influence of Private Bus Operators in the Planning Process

    Planning Public Transport Improvements in Mexico: Analysis of the Influence of Private Bus Operators in the Planning Process

    Planning Public Transport Improvements in Mexico: Analysis of the Influence of Private Bus Operators in the Planning Process by Abel Lopez Dodero A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Planning Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 ©Abel Lopez Dodero 2013 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract In Mexico, transportation planning deals with unique social, political, financial and cultural elements when promoting mobility solutions. These elements include the opportunity costs of public investments, institutional barriers and changes in the political agenda. Other important element is the influence of existing private bus operator. Bus provision is offered by a disproportionate number of small private enterprises, single concessionaries and unregulated providers. Today, many of these entities have gained political power and, often, resist attempts to improve public transportation. The recommended solution to overcome political problem created from the opposition from private providers includes the introduction of franchise systems. Franchising systems under strict institutional regulations support the incorporation of current private providers in the proposed projects. However, incorporating bus operators into any form of system under franchise system implies major changes in private providers’ business and routines. Franchising implies moving from concession-owner-driver to simple employee or shareholder of the new system. Franchising also results in having to change routines associated with the operation.
  • Judicial Reform in Mexico Toward a New Criminal Justice System

    Judicial Reform in Mexico Toward a New Criminal Justice System

    Judicial Reform in Mexico Toward a New Criminal Justice System Trans-Border Institute Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies University of San Diego May 2010 About the Report: This report was prepared for the Justice in Mexico Project (www.justiceinmexico.org) coordinated by the Trans-Border Institute (TBI) at the University of San Diego. Since 2002, this project has been a focal point for research, scholarly interchange, and policy forums to examine the challenges and prospects for the rule of law in Mexico. This project is made possible by the very generous support of The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and The Tinker Foundation. This report also benefited from the support of the Smith-Richardson Foundation in a grant to TBI and Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center, and from the TIES Program from Higher Education for Development sponsored by the U.S. Agency for International Development through a grant to the University of San Diego and the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California. Copyright: Justice in Mexico Project, 2010. Cover art derived from Wikicommons. Trans-Border Institute (TBI) University of San Diego 5998 Alcalá Park, San Diego, CA 92103 www.sandiego.edu/tbi Judicial Reform in Mexico Toward a New Criminal Justice System May 2010 SPECIAL REPORT Trans-BorderBy Matt Ingram and Institute David A. Shirk Joan B. Kroc School of Peace Studies University of San Diego Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 1 Overview: Judicial Reform in Mexico ......................................................................... 3 Mexico’s Criminal Justice Sector Challenges ............................................................... 3 What Kind of Reform? Oral Trials, Due Process, and More ..................................... 6 1) “Oral Trials”: Changes in Mexican Criminal Procedure .....................................
  • Road Freight Transport in Mexico: Production and Employment Autotransporte De Carga En México: Producción Y Empleo

    Road Freight Transport in Mexico: Production and Employment Autotransporte De Carga En México: Producción Y Empleo

    Análisis Económico, vol. XXXV, núm. 90, septiembre-diciembre de 2020, pp. 147-172, ISSN: 0185-3937, e- ISSN: 2448-6655 Road freight transport in Mexico: production and employment Autotransporte de carga en México: producción y empleo (Received: 16/April/2020; accepted: 09/July/2020; published: 04/September/2020) Luis David Berrones-Sanz* ABSTRACT Road freight transport is the main way of transportation in Mexico; besides it moves the 83.2% of domestic tonnage, it contributes with the 3.96% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and generates 2.73% of employment nationwide. Moreover, it’s contextualized under a business structure conformed by 152,487 companies, where 97.2% are classified as micro (89.7%) or small companies (16.5%) and that together possess 53% (n=522,221) of the vehicles, that average a seventeen-year-old antiquity. The GDP analysis and the subsector employment show that despite that the number of employed personnel in the road freight transport have a correlation coefficient of 0.99 with Nacional GDP and with the GDP of road freight transport the number of drivers has not increased (AAGR=0.31%) at the same rhythm as the GDP of road freight transport (AAGR=0.97%), and that the National GDP (AAGR=1.36%) of the last years (2008-2013) resulting in an over 80,000 driver scarcity: this despite that this workgroup has relatively higher incomes than the average of workers and in a national context where there is a lack of job opportunities. However, the output elasticity of employment in the last lustrum is Ꜫ15-19=1.009, and the evidence shows that despite the economic situation of 2020 and the reduction of production there will not be any reduction in the number of drivers in the road freight transportation area (Ꜫ19-20=0.94) and, as a result, it seems that they will not have unemployment risks.
  • Sustainable Housing in Mexico

    Sustainable Housing in Mexico

    SUSTAINABLE HOUSING IN MEXICO 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 I. MEXICAN HOUSING 3 II. SUSTAINABLE HOUSING: A CONCEPT ADOPTED BY THE NATIONAL HOUSING COMMISSION IN MEXICO 3 III. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT’S PUBLIC HOUSING POLICY 3 1. Improve public and private management on behalf of sustainable housing 4 2. Objectives of the 2008–2012 National Housing Program: a) Increase the coverage of financing for housing offered 5 to the population, particularly for low- income families 5 b) Promote sustainable housing development. 10 5 c) Consolidate the national housing system through improvements in public management 8 d) Consolidate a Federal Government support policy that helps the low-income population to obtain financing for housing and promotes sustainable housing development 6 IV. SUSTAINABLE HOUSING 7 V. CONCEPTS OF SUSTAINABLE HOUSING IN MEXICO TABLE OF CONTENTS 7 1. The Green Mortgage: A product of the Institute of the National Housing Fund for Workers (INFONAVIT) 8 a) Green Mortgage (HV) 8 b) Objectives 8 c) Benefits of the HV 8 d) Eco-technologies 9 e) Bio-climate regions and eco-technologies 10 f) E stimated savings per family 10 g) INFONAVIT 2011 11 h) Incorporation of Eco-technologies in the HV 11 i) Green Mortgage 2011 Objectives 11 j) Results 12 k) International Recognition 13 2. “This Is Your House” Subsidy 13 a) Objectives 13 b) Characteristics of the Basic Package for the Subsidy 13 c) CONAVI Requirements 14 d) Notes 14 3. Sustainable Integrated Urban Developments (Desarrollos Urbanos Integrales Sustentables, DUIS) 14 a) Background 14 b) Federal Government Encouragement 14 c) Courses of Action 15 d) Institutionalization: Inter-Secretarial Housing Commission 16 e) Integrated Sustainable Urban Developments 16 f) Types of DUIS 16 g) Sponsors of DUIS 16 h) Integration and Coordination Scheme for the Institutionalization of GPDUIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 17 i) Institutionalization at Civil Society Level: DUIS Consultative Committee 17 j) Projects – Current Status 18 4.
  • La Entrada Al Pacifico Planning Study-TTI-12-7-04

    La Entrada Al Pacifico Planning Study-TTI-12-7-04

    LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY Prepared for: Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization and Texas Department of Transportation – Odessa District Prepared by: Texas Transportation Institute December 2004 LA ENTRADA AL PACIFICO TRADE CORRIDOR PLANNING STUDY by by William E. Frawley, AICP Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute John Overman, AICP Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute Juan Villa Associate Research Scientist Texas Transportation Institute and Ajay Shakyaver, P.E. Advanced Transportation Planning Engineer Texas Department of Transportation Project Title: Provide Technical Assistance Related to a Future National Corridor Planning and Development Study for the “La Entrada al Pacifico” Trade Corridor for the Midland-Odessa MPO December 2004 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 77843-3135 DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) or the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to thank the project director, Robert Cox, of the Midland-Odessa Metropolitan Planning Organization. The authors would also like to acknowledge the assistance provided by the following individuals for their valuable assistance and input: Lauren Garduno – Texas Department of Transportation James Beauchamp – Midland-Odessa Transportation Alliance In addition, the authors would like to acknowledge Claire Fazio of the Texas Transportation Insitute (TTI) for her work on maps and graphics, Edd Sepulveda of TTI for his statistical work, Lisa Day of TTI for her work on graphics, and Carol Court for her editorial work.
  • First Steps of the Cabinet of Enrique Peña Nieto SPECIAL REPORT

    First Steps of the Cabinet of Enrique Peña Nieto SPECIAL REPORT

    SPECIAL REPORT Mexico: First steps of the cabinet of Enrique Peña Nieto Mexico, January 2013 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO MEXICO: FIRST STEPS OF THE CABINET OF ENRIQUE PEÑA NIETO 1. INTRODUCTION 1. INTRODUCTION 2. POLITICS, ECONOMY AND On 1 December 2012 Enrique Peña Nieto was sworn in as Constitutional SOCIETY: CABINET’S CENTRAL President of the United Mexican States. FORMATION 3. THE PACT FOR MEXICO Furthermore, in 2012, the elections of 128 Senators and 500 Federal 4. EXPENDITURE BUDGET Deputies were held; at the local level were elected 6 Governors of 5. CONCLUSIONS the states of Chiapas, Guanajuato, Jalisco, Morelos, Tabasco and AUTHORS Yucatan; Head of Government of the Federal District; 579 local LLORENTE & CUENCA deputies in 15 states; 876 city councils; 20 municipal boards; and 16 Heads of Delegation of Mexico City. In total, 2127 positions at national level. In this report, we intend to describe in general the key points in the government’s formation headed by the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI in Spanish), the party which ruled in Mexico for 71 years, lost power to the National Action Party (PAN in Spanish) during two presidential terms and is back now. Peña Nieto has affirmed on different occasions that the PRI is no longer the same one which governed Mexico; in view of this statement, it is necessary to point out that Mexico is neither the same, that society and business people are aware of and up-to-date with what is happening, since formal and informal media and the social networks help to have a better understanding of the actions of our rulers and of national and international events.