An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, October 2009 Implementation, and Construction Processes 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/TX-10/0-5985-1 Accession No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, October 2009 Implementation, and Construction Processes 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Lisa Loftus-Otway, Nathan Hutson, Alejandra Cruz-Ross, 0-5985-1 Rachel Niven, Leigh B. Boske, Jolanda P. Prozzi 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Center for Transportation Research 11. Contract or Grant No. The University of Texas at Austin 0-5985-1 3208 Red River, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78705-2650 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Texas Department of Transportation Technical report, September 1, 2007 – Research and Technology Implementation Office October 30, 2009. P.O. Box 5080 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Austin, TX 78763-5080 15. Supplementary Notes Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract This research examined the legal, financial, institutional and policy processes that Mexico uses to plan, finance, construct, and implement its transportation network. It documents through twelve case studies the state of the practice in planning, financing, conducting traffic and revenue studies, cost benefit analysis, and environmental assessments and reviews how right-of-way purchase occurs for multimodal transportation infrastructure projects. It was found that Mexico is aggressively targeting infrastructure development as a mechanism to improve countrywide network and modal connectivity and to redress social and economic inequality that had occurred because of the poor transportation network. The 2007 National Infrastructure Plan covers 5 years and multiple modes and will finance approximately 58% of the projects using innovative finance methods and public private partnerships. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Mexico transportation planning, Mexico No restrictions. This document is available to the transportation finance, Mexico’s transportation public through the National Technical Information infrastructure, 2007-2012 National Infrastructure Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161; www.ntis.gov. Plan, public private partnerships, highways, commuter rail, ports, airports, inland ports and border panning 19. Security Classif. (of report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 180 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance, Implementation, and Construction Processes Lisa Loftus-Otway Nathan Hutson Alejandra Cruz-Ross Rachel Niven Leigh B. Boske Jolanda Prozzi CTR Technical Report: 0-5985-1 Report Date: October 2009 Project: 0-5985 Project Title: An Evaluation of Mexican Transportation Planning, Finance and Implementation Processes Sponsoring Agency: Texas Department of Transportation Performing Agency: Center for Transportation Research at The University of Texas at Austin Project performed in cooperation with the Texas Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin 3208 Red River Austin, TX 78705 www.utexas.edu/research/ctr Copyright (c) 2009 Center for Transportation Research The University of Texas at Austin All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America iv Disclaimers Author's Disclaimer: The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official view or policies of the Federal Highway Administration or the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. Patent Disclaimer: There was no invention or discovery conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of or under this contract, including any art, method, process, machine manufacture, design or composition of matter, or any new useful improvement thereof, or any variety of plant, which is or may be patentable under the patent laws of the United States of America or any foreign country. Engineering Disclaimer NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION, BIDDING, OR PERMIT PURPOSES. Research Supervisor: Jolanda Prozzi P. E. Designation: Research Supervisor v Acknowledgments The authors express appreciation to: the TxDOT Project Director Eduardo Calvo - Advance Transportation Planning Director of El Paso District- TxDOT, and Duncan Stewart P.E., Ph.D., and Sylvia Medina of the Research and Technology Implementation Office at TxDOT. The members of the Project Monitoring Committee, Agustin de la Rosa, Esther Hitzfelder, Leocadio Matias, Manuela Ortiz, and Sasha Russell in TxDOTs International Office; Christin Longoria and Roberto Rodriguez in the Laredo District, Marty Boyd and Efrain Esparza in El Paso District, Joseph Leal in Pharr District and Orlando Jamadre Jr. in the Multimodal Division. This project could also not have been undertaken without the generous assistance, contributions, and time given by many public and private sector groups in Mexico and the U.S. Specifically Oscar de Buen Richkarday Infrastructure Deputy Secretary, Bernardo José Ortiz Mantilla, Coordinator of Special Projects at SCT and Manuel Cuan Chin Yu, Subdirector de Asuntos Internacionales e Intersecretariales Coordinación Técnica de Planeación de Infraestructura Carretera, SCT, D.F. Mexico; who assisted with case study selection and who graciously set up many initial meetings. We also want to thank the following organizations who graciously participated in the project and whose staff shared their invaluable insights: AGM Enterprises Servicios; Altamira Terminal Portuaria, Altamira, Mexico; API Altamira, Altamira, Mexico; API Lázaro Cárdenas, Lázaro Cárdenas, Mexico; API Manzanillo, Manzanillo, Mexico; Brownsville and Matamoros Bridge Company, Brownsville, Texas; Brownsville and Rio Grande International Railroad, Brownsville, Texas; Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, Fort Worth, Texas; , Cal y Mayor Associates; Cameron County, Brownsville, Texas; Centro de Transporte Sustenable de México, D.F., Mexico; Centro Mexicano de Derecho Ambiental, D.F. Mexico; Cruces y Puentes Internacionales (CPI), D.F. Mexico; DIRAC, Circuito Exterior Mexiquense; Felipe Ochoa Associates, D.F., Mexico; Ferrocarilles Suburbanos S.A. de C.V., D.F., Mexico; Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Secretaría Seguridad Pública, Mexico; INDAABIN; Kansas City Southern de México Railroad, Mexico; Mexico Transportación Ejecutiva y Turística, Mexico; North American Super Corridor Organization, Dallas, Texas; NEMEX-TEX Partnership; OMA Aeropuerto de Monterrey Nuevo León, Mexico; Port of Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas; Reynosa Anzaldúas Bridge, Tamaulipas, Mexico; SSA Mexico; Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Mexico City, Mexico; Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores Mexico City, Mexico; Secretaría de Transportes y Vialidad, Hidalgo, Mexico; State of San Luis Potosí; State of Monterrey; State of Nuevo León; Sumar Sinergia S.A. de C.V.; U.S. Commercial Service, D.F. Mexico. Finally this project could not have been completed without the assistance and work of our first year graduate assistant Cesar Medina and the LBJ School of Public Policy’s PRP Group which comprised the following graduate students: Edmund Gordon, María Fernanda Gutiérrez Pita Padilla, Kate Mason, Jamie L. McAllister, Angela Mora, Caitlin Morris, Rachel Niven, Lauren Rose, Beatriz Rutzen, Sameen Siddiqi, Laura F. Tibbitt, Rebecca Takahashi, Ernest Worley, Zhixing Zhang and Mengying Zhao. vi Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 2. Statutory Processes for Transportation Development ........................................... 5 2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................5 2.2 Legal Authority for Transportation Development .................................................................6 2.2.1 Strategic and Priority Activities ..................................................................................... 6 Highway Network ............................................................................................................... 7 Railroads ............................................................................................................................. 7 Ports .................................................................................................................................... 7 Airports ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Environmental Regulation of Transportation Projects................................................... 8 2.2.3 Foreign Investment ........................................................................................................ 9 2.2.4 Role of International Treaties and Cooperation Arrangements ..................................... 9 2.3 Planning of Transportation Infrastructure ..............................................................................9 2.3.2 Agencies Involved in National and International Transportation Planning