DOCSLIB.ORG

Simulation of Ground-Water Discharge to Biscayne Bay, Southeastern Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Simulation of Ground-Water Discharge to Biscayne Bay, Southeastern Florida Simulation of Ground-Water Discharge to Biscayne Bay, Southeastern Florida U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Prepared as part of the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PLACE-BASED STUDIES PROGRAM and in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Rainfall Surface water in Everglades Biscayne Evapotranspiration Recharge Bay Submarine ground-water Canal Canal discharge Water table Water table Lateral BISCAYNE boundary AQUIFER flow Freshwater Municipal Municipal well field well field Brackish water Seawater Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4251 Simulation of Ground-Water Discharge to Biscayne Bay, Southeastern Florida By Christian D. Langevin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 00-4251 Prepared as part of the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Place-Based Studies Program and in cooperation with the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Tallahassee, Florida 2001 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Suite 3015 Box 25286 227 N. Bronough Street Denver, CO 80225-0286 Tallahassee, FL 32301 888-ASK-USGS Additional information about water resources in Florida is available on the World Wide Web at http://fl.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods of Field Investigation.................................................................................................................................... 2 Previous Studies........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Hydrogeology of Southeastern Florida.................................................................................................................................. 6 Hydrostratigraphy ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Aquifer Properties........................................................................................................................................................ 8 Water-Budget Components.......................................................................................................................................... 10 Rainfall, Evapotranspiration, and Runoff .......................................................................................................... 10 Surface-Water/Ground-Water Interaction ......................................................................................................... 10 Ground-Water Withdrawals............................................................................................................................... 13 Freshwater-Saltwater Transition Zone......................................................................................................................... 14 Simulation of Ground-Water Discharge to Biscayne Bay..................................................................................................... 22 Governing Equations ................................................................................................................................................... 24 SEAWAT Simulation Code.......................................................................................................................................... 26 Cross-Sectional Ground-Water Flow Models.............................................................................................................. 27 Model Design..................................................................................................................................................... 27 Model Calibration and Simulation Results........................................................................................................ 29 Sensitivity Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 33 Regional-Scale Ground-Water Flow Model ................................................................................................................ 34 Spatial and Temporal Discretization..................................................................................................................35 Assignment of Aquifer Parameters.................................................................................................................... 35 Boundary Conditions ......................................................................................................................................... 38 Biscayne Bay............................................................................................................................................ 38 Inland Model Domain Boundaries........................................................................................................... 38 Lower Model Boundary........................................................................................................................... 39 Internal Hydrologic Stresses.............................................................................................................................. 39 Canals....................................................................................................................................................... 39 Ponded Surface Water.............................................................................................................................. 40 Recharge and Runoff ............................................................................................................................... 40 Evapotranspiration ................................................................................................................................... 40 Municipal Well Fields.............................................................................................................................. 42 Initial Conditions ............................................................................................................................................... 42 Calibration Procedure and Model Results ......................................................................................................... 42 Comparison of Simulated and Observed Heads ...................................................................................... 42 Comparison of Simulated and Observed Canal Baseflow....................................................................... 43 Net Recharge............................................................................................................................................ 51 Saltwater Interface ................................................................................................................................... 51 Ground-Water Flow to Biscayne Bay...................................................................................................... 54 Sensitivity Analysis ........................................................................................................................................... 56 Model Limitations ....................................................................................................................................................... 59 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................................................... 60 References Cited.................................................................................................................................................................... 61 Appendix I: Lithologic Descriptions of Selected Cores as Determined for this Study......................................................... 67 Appendix II: Field Data Collected as Part of this Study ....................................................................................................... 85 Appendix III: Monitoring Stations Used in this Study.......................................................................................................... 101 Appendix IV: Verification of the SEAWAT Code ................................................................................................................. 121 Contents III PLATES 1. Sections showing sensitivity analysis results for the Coconut Grove model.................................................. pocket 2. Sections showing sensitivity analysis results for the Deering
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Interrelationships Among Hydrological, Biodiversity and Land Use Features of the Pantanal and Everglades
    Interrelationships among hydrological, biodiversity and Land Use Features of the Pantanal and Everglades Biogeochemical Segmentation and Derivation of Numeric Nutrient Criteria for Coastal Everglades waters. FIU Henry Briceño. Joseph N. Boyer NPS Joffre Castro 100 years of hydrology intervention …urban development 1953 1999 Naples Bay impacted by drainage, channelization, and urban development FDEP 2010 SEGMENTATION METHOD Six basins, 350 stations POR 1991 (1995)-1998. NH4, NO2, TOC, TP, TN, NO3, TON, SRP, DO, Turbidity, Salinity, CHLa, Temperature Factor Analysis (PC extraction) Scores Mean, SD, Median, MAD Hierarchical Clustering NUMERIC NUTRIENT CRITERIA The USEPA recommends three types of approaches for setting numeric nutrient criteria: - reference condition approach - stressor-response analysis - mechanistic modeling. A Station’s Never to Exceed (NTE) Limit. This limit is the highest possible level that a station concentration can reach at any time A Segment’s Annual Geometric Mean (AGM) Limit. This limit is the highest possible level a segment’s average concentration of annual geometric means can reach in year A Segment’s 1-in-3 Years (1in3) Limit. This limit is the level that a segment average concentration of annual geometric means should be less than or equal to, at least, twice in three consecutive years. 1in3 AGM NTE 90% 80% 95% AGM : Annual Geometric Mean Not to be exceeded 1in3 : Annual Geometric Mean Not to exceed more than once in 3 yrs Biscayne Bay, Annual Geometric Means 0.7 AGMAGM Limit : Not to be exceeded 0.6 (Annual Geometric Mean not to be exceeded) 1in31in3 Limit : Not to exceed more 0.5 (Annualthan Geometric once Mean in not 3 to beyears exceeded more than once in 3 yrs) 0.4 0.3 Total Nitrogen, mg/LNitrogen, Total 0.2 Potentially Enriched 0.1 SCO NCO SNB NCI NNB CS SCM SCI MBS THRESHOLD ANALYSIS Regime Shift Detection methods (Rodionov 2004) Cumulative deviations from mean method CTZ CHLa Zcusum Threshold 20 0 -20 Cusum .
    [Show full text]
  • Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, Florida
    HUD PD&R Housing Market Profiles Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall, Florida Quick Facts About Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall By T. Michael Miller | As of June 1, 2019 Current sales market conditions: balanced Overview Current apartment market conditions: balanced The Miami-Miami Beach-Kendall Metropolitan Division (hereafter, Miami-Dade County), on the southeastern coast of Florida, is Known as a destination for beautiful beaches coterminous with Miami-Dade County. The coastal location makes and eclectic nightlife, the Miami HMA attracted Miami-Dade County an attractive destination for trade and tourism. an estimated 15.9 million visitors in 2017, which During 2018, nearly 8.78 million tons of cargo passed through had an economic impact of more than $38.9 PortMiami, an increase of 2 percent from 2017. The number of billion on the HMA’s economy (Greater Miami cruise passengers out of PortMiami also hit record highs, with Convention & Visitors Bureau). 5.3 million passengers sailing during 2017, up nearly 5 percent from 2016 (Greater Miami Convention & Visitors Bureau). y As of June 1, 2019, the population of Miami-Dade County is estimated at 2.79 million, reflecting an average annual increase of 24,000, or 0.9 percent, since 2016 (U.S. Census Bureau population estimates as of July 1). Net in-migration averaged 9,050 people annually during the period, accounting for 38 percent of the population growth. y From 2011 to 2016, population growth was more rapid because of stronger international in-migration. Population growth averaged 30,550 people, or 1.2 percent, annually, and net in-migration averaged 17,900 people annually, which was 59 percent of the growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Jim Crow at the Beach: an Oral and Archival History of the Segregated Past at Homestead Bayfront Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Biscayne National Park Jim Crow at the Beach: An Oral and Archival History of the Segregated Past at Homestead Bayfront Park. ON THE COVER Biscayne National Park’s Visitor Center harbor, former site of the “Black Beach” at the once-segregated Homestead Bayfront Park. Photo by Biscayne National Park Jim Crow at the Beach: An Oral and Archival History of the Segregated Past at Homestead Bayfront Park. BISC Acc. 413. Iyshia Lowman, University of South Florida National Park Service Biscayne National Park 9700 SW 328th St. Homestead, FL 33033 December, 2012 U.S. Department of the InteriorNational Park Service Biscayne National Park Homestead, FL Contents Figures............................................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................................... iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 A Period in Time ............................................................................................................................. 1 The Long Road to Segregation ....................................................................................................... 4 At the Swimming Hole ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COLA
    Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1: HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.4 HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING ..................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1 HYDROLOGIC DESCRIPTION ............................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.1 Site and Facilities .....................................................................2.4.1-1 2.4.1.2 Hydrosphere .............................................................................2.4.1-3 2.4.1.3 References .............................................................................2.4.1-12 2.4.1-i Revision 6 Turkey Point Units 6 & 7 COL Application Part 2 — FSAR SUBSECTION 2.4.1 LIST OF TABLES Number Title 2.4.1-201 East Miami-Dade County Drainage Subbasin Areas and Outfall Structures 2.4.1-202 Summary of Data Records for Gage Stations at S-197, S-20, S-21A, and S-21 Flow Control Structures 2.4.1-203 Monthly Mean Flows at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 2.4.1-204 Monthly Mean Water Level at the Canal C-111 Structure S-197 (Headwater) 2.4.1-205 Monthly Mean Flows in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 2.4.1-206 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Canal L-31E at Structure S-20 (Headwaters) 2.4.1-207 Monthly Mean Flows in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A 2.4.1-208 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Princeton Canal at Structure S-21A (Headwaters) 2.4.1-209 Monthly Mean Flows in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-210 Monthly Mean Water Levels in the Black Creek Canal at Structure S-21 2.4.1-211 NOAA
    [Show full text]
  • Segment 16 Map Book
    Hollywood BROWARD Hallandale M aa p 44 -- B North Miami Beach North Miami Hialeah Miami Beach Miami M aa p 44 -- B South Miami F ll o r ii d a C ii r c u m n a v ii g a tt ii o n Key Biscayne Coral Gables M aa p 33 -- B S a ll tt w a tt e r P a d d ll ii n g T r a ii ll S e g m e n tt 1 6 DADE M aa p 33 -- A B ii s c a y n e B a y M aa p 22 -- B Drinking Water Homestead Camping Kayak Launch Shower Facility Restroom M aa p 22 -- A Restaurant M aa p 11 -- B Grocery Store Point of Interest M aa p 11 -- A Disclaimer: This guide is intended as an aid to navigation only. A Gobal Positioning System (GPS) unit is required, and persons are encouraged to supplement these maps with NOAA charts or other maps. Segment 16: Biscayne Bay Little Pumpkin Creek Map 1 B Pumpkin Key Card Point Little Angelfish Creek C A Snapper Point R Card Sound D 12 S O 6 U 3 N 6 6 18 D R Dispatch Creek D 12 Biscayne Bay Aquatic Preserve 3 ´ Ocean Reef Harbor 12 Wednesday Point 12 Card Point Cut 12 Card Bank 12 5 18 0 9 6 3 R C New Mahogany Hammock State Botanical Site 12 6 Cormorant Point Crocodile Lake CR- 905A 12 6 Key Largo Hammock Botanical State Park Mosquito Creek Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuge Dynamite Docks 3 6 18 6 North Key Largo 12 30 Steamboat Creek John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park Carysfort Yacht Harbor 18 12 D R D 3 N U O S 12 D R A 12 C 18 Basin Hills Elizabeth, Point 3 12 12 12 0 0.5 1 2 Miles 3 6 12 12 3 12 6 12 Segment 16: Biscayne Bay 3 6 Map 1 A 12 12 3 6 ´ Thursday Point Largo Point 6 Mary, Point 12 D R 6 D N U 3 O S D R S A R C John Pennekamp Coral Reef State Park 5 18 3 12 B Garden Cove Campsite Snake Point Garden Cove Upper Sound Point 6 Sexton Cove 18 Rattlesnake Key Stellrecht Point Key Largo 3 Sound Point T A Y L 12 O 3 R 18 D Whitmore Bight Y R W H S A 18 E S Anglers Park R 18 E V O Willie, Point Largo Sound N: 25.1248 | W: -80.4042 op t[ D A I* R A John Pennekamp State Park A M 12 B N: 25.1730 | W: -80.3654 t[ O L 0 Radabo0b.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 6 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of The
    FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion. (1) Estuary-specific numeric interpretations of the narrative nutrient criterion in paragraph 62-302.530(47)(b), F.A.C., are in the table below. The concentration-based estuary interpretations are open water, area-wide averages. The interpretations expressed as load per million cubic meters of freshwater inflow are the total load of that nutrient to the estuary divided by the total volume of freshwater inflow to that estuary. Page 1 of 6 FAC 62-302.532 Estuary-Specific Numeric Interpretations of the Narrative Nutrient Criterion Effective Date: 12/20/2012 Estuary Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen Chlorophyll a (a) Clearwater Harbor/St. Joseph Sound Annual geometric mean values not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions. 1. St.Joseph Sound 0.05 mg/L 0.66 mg/L 3.1 µg/L 2. Clearwater North 0.05 mg/L 0.61 mg/L 5.4 µg/L 3. Clearwater South 0.06 mg/L 0.58 mg/L 7.6 µg/L (b) Tampa Bay Annual totals for nutrients and annual arithmetic means for chlorophyll a, not to be exceeded more than once in a three year period. Nutrient and nutrient response values do not apply to tidally influenced areas that fluctuate between predominantly marine and predominantly fresh waters during typical climatic and hydrologic conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Miami Biscayne Bay Millionaire Row Boat Tour Pick up List
    Miami Biscayne Bay Millionaire Row Boat Tour Pick Up List Name Address City Time 1 Central Station-Bayside 401 Biscayne Blvd, Miami FL Downtown 10:10 AM 2 Eden Roc Renaissance Miami Beach (RAMP) 4525 Collins Ave. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:15 AM 3 1 Hotel South beach 2341 Collins Ave Miami Beach 9:30 AM 4 AC Hotel by Marriott 2912 collins ave. Miami Beach 9:30 AM 5 Acqualina Resort & Spa on the Beach (RAMP) 17875 Collins Ave. Sunny Isles, FL Miami Beach 8:00 AM 6 Alexander Hotel Miami Beach (RAMP) 5225 Collins Ave. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:00 AM 7 Avalon Hotel 700 Ocean Dr., Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:50 AM 8 Baltic Hotel 7643 Harding Ave., Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 8:50 AM 9 Beach Paradise Hotel 600 Ocean Dr. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:50 AM 10 Beach Plaza 1401 Collins Avenue Miami 9:40 AM 11 Bentley Hotel 510 Ocean Dr. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:50 AM 12 Berkeley Shore Hotel 1610 Collins Ave. Miami Beach 9:40 AM 13 Best Western Atlantic Beach Resort (RAMP) 4101 Collins Ave. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:15 AM 14 Best Western Oceanfront Resort (RAMP) 9365 Collins Ave. Bal Harbour, FL Miami Beach 8:50 AM 15 Betsy Hotel 1440 Ocean Dr. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:40 AM 16 Blanc Kara Hotel 205 Collins Ave Miami 9:50 AM 17 Blue Moon Hotel 944 Collins Ave. Miami Beach, FL Miami Beach 9:50 AM 18 Boulan South Beach 2000 Collins Ave Miami 9:30 AM 19 Carillon Miami Beach 6801 Collins Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Net Freshwater Supply on Salinity in Florida
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, VOL. 36, NO. 7, PAGES 1805–1822, JULY 2000 Influence of net freshwater supply on salinity in Florida Bay William K. Nuttle and James W. Fourqurean Southeast Environmental Research Center, Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami Bernard J. Cosby and Joseph C. Zieman Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Michael B. Robblee Biological Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Florida International University, Miami Abstract. An annual water budget for Florida Bay, the large, seasonally hypersaline estuary in the Everglades National Park, was constructed using physically based models and long-term (31 years) data on salinity, hydrology, and climate. Effects of seasonal and interannual variations of the net freshwater supply (runoff plus rainfall minus evaporation) on salinity variation within the bay were also examined. Particular attention was paid to the effects of runoff, which are the focus of ambitious plans to restore and conserve the Florida Bay ecosystem. From 1965 to 1995 the annual runoff from the Everglades into the bay was less than one tenth of the annual direct rainfall onto the bay, while estimated annual evaporation slightly exceeded annual rainfall. The average net freshwater supply to the bay over a year was thus approximately zero, and interannual variations in salinity appeared to be affected primarily by interannual fluctuations in rainfall. At the annual scale, runoff apparently had little effect on the bay as a whole during this period. On a seasonal basis, variations in rainfall, evaporation, and runoff were not in phase, and the net freshwater supply to the bay varied between positive and negative values, contributing to a strong seasonal pattern in salinity, especially in regions of the bay relatively isolated from exchanges with the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Demographics Report By
    2018 Demographics Report by: Applied Research & Analytics Nicholas Martinez, AICP Urban Economics & Market Development, Senior Manager Kathryn Angleton Research & GIS Coordinator Miami Downtown Development Authority 200 S Biscayne Blvd Suite 2929 Miami, FL 33131 Table of Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………..2 Greater Downtown Miami…………………………………..3 Population…………………………………………………………..4 Population Growth…………………………………....4 Population Distribution……………………………..5 Age Composition………………………………………............6 Households………………………………………....................10 Household Growth…………………………………....10 Trends………………………………………..................10 Local Context……………………………………….................12 Population and Households……………………….12 Employment and Labor……………………………..13 Daytime Population…………………………………..14 Metropolitan Context………………………………………….16 Population and Households……………………….17 Employment and Labor……………………………...18 Daytime Population…………………………………..20 Cost of Living……………………………………………..22 Migration……………………………………….......................24 Income………………………………………...........................25 Educational Attainment……………………………………….26 Pet Ownership………………………………………................28 Exercise………………………………………..........................29 Appendix………………………………………........................30 Metropolitan Areas……………………………………31 Florida Cities………………………………………........32 Greater Downtown & Surrounding Areas…..33 Downtown Miami……………………………………...34 Sources………………………………………………………………..35 Executive Summary Florida Florida is the third most populous state with over 19.9 million people. Within
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Geologic History of the Floridian Plateau
    Jy ur.H A(Lic, n *^^. tJMr^./*>- . r A CONTRIBUTION TO THE GEOLOGIC HISTORY OF THE FLORIDIAN PLATEAU. BY THOMAS WAYLAND VAUGHAN, Geologist in Charge of Coastal Plain Investigation, U. S. Geological Survey, Custodian of Madreporaria, U. S. National IMuseum. 15 plates, 6 text figures. Extracted from Publication No. 133 of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, pages 99-185. 1910. v{cff« dl^^^^^^ .oV A CONTRIBUTION TO THE_^EOLOGIC HISTORY/ OF THE/PLORIDIANy PLATEAU. By THOMAS WAYLAND YAUGHAn/ Geologist in Charge of Coastal Plain Investigation, U. S. Ge6logical Survey, Custodian of Madreporaria, U. S. National Museum. 15 plates, 6 text figures. 99 CONTENTS. Introduction 105 Topography of the Floridian Plateau 107 Relation of the loo-fathom curve to the present land surface and to greater depths 107 The lo-fathom curve 108 The reefs -. 109 The Hawk Channel no The keys no Bays and sounds behind the keys in Relief of the mainland 112 Marine bottom deposits forming in the bays and sounds behind the keys 1 14 Biscayne Bay 116 Between Old Rhodes Bank and Carysfort Light 117 Card Sound 117 Barnes Sound 117 Blackwater Sound 117 Hoodoo Sound 117 Florida Bay 117 Gun and Cat Keys, Bahamas 119 Summary of data on the material of the deposits 119 Report on examination of material from the sea-bottom between Miami and Key West, by George Charlton Matson 120 Sources of material 126 Silica 126 Geologic distribution of siliceous sand in Florida 127 Calcium carbonate 129 Calcium carbonate of inorganic origin 130 Pleistocene limestone of southern Florida 130 Topography of southern Florida 131 Vegetation of southern Florida 131 Drainage and rainfall of southern Florida 132 Chemical denudation 133 Precipitation of chemically dissolved calcium carbonate.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1
    Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Seagrass Integrated Mapping and Monitoring for the State of Florida Mapping and Monitoring Report No. 1 Edited by Laura A. Yarbro and Paul R. Carlson Jr. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute St. Petersburg, Florida March 2011 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Yarbro and Carlson, Editors SIMM Report #1 Table of Contents Authors, Contributors, and SIMM Team Members .................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................. 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 31 How this report was put together ........................................................................................... 36 Chapter Reports ...................................................................................................................... 41 Perdido Bay ........................................................................................................................... 41 Pensacola Bay .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brickell Bayfront Centre
    BRICKELL BAYFRONT CENTRE OFFERING MEMORANDUM It is impossible to replicate this rare opportunity to acquire Brickell Bayfront Centre, a +/- 15,237 SF mixed-use commercial property with magnificent views of Biscayne Bay. Defined by its prestigious Brickell Avenue address, it has a ground floor presence within the luxurious Brickell Bay Club. The acquisition of Brickell Bayfront Centre also includes ownership & deeded control of 109 on-site parking spaces for an unbelievable 7.15/1000 ratio. This offering provides tremendous value for either an investor, an end-user, or developer. 2333 Brickell Avenue Unit A Miami, FL 33129 BRICKELLBAYFRONTCENTRE tableofcontents Property Overview Executive Summary 3-4 Floor Plan 5 Site Aerial Map 6 Valuation 7 Buy vs. Rent Analysis 8 Parking Plan 9 Potential Development 10 Area Overview Sub-Market Information & 11-13 BrickellHighlights Disclosure 14 Brickell Bayfront Centre FROM MIAMI: Highway I-95 to exit 1-A. Follow SW 26th Road eastbound and turn left onto Brickell directions Avenue. The property can be found within a few blocks on the right hand side of the street. Disclaimer: The information and summary of calculations in this report is for our client only, and is based on current information that we consider reliable, but we do not represent it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied on as such. This analysis does not constitute a recommendation to make a specific business decision, to lease a specific space, or agree to specific business terms, nor take into account every particular objective, financial situation, or need of Page2 individual clients. Clients should consider whether any advice or recommendation in this summary report is suitable for their particular circumstances and, if appropriate, seek additional professional advice, including tax, accounting, and legal Privileged and Confidential advice.
    [Show full text]