DOCSLIB.ORG

Sample Chapter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sample Chapter Copyright material – 9781137029607 © Kris Deschouwer 2009, 2012 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No portion of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First edition 2009 This edition published 2012 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN Palgrave Macmillan in the UK is an imprint of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries ISBN: 978-1-137-03024-5 hardback ISBN: 978-1-137-02960-7 paperback This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. Logging, pulping and manufacturing processes are expected to conform to the environmental regulations of the country of origin. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. 10 9 8 7654321 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 Printed in China Copyright material – 9781137029607 Contents List of Figures and Tables viii List of Abbreviations and Acronyms xi 1 Why Belgium? 1 Who needs Belgium? 1 Consociational democracy 5 Some kind of federal state 11 Trust and support 12 Plan of the book 15 2 A Short Political History 18 Union and separation of the Low Countries 18 The weight of history 22 1830–1848: Consolidation and ‘unionism’ 26 1848–1893: The social question and the Flemish question 28 1893–1918: The right to vote 32 1918–1945: More consociationalism and territorial division 35 1945–1995: Towards a federal state 38 After 1995: The federation at work 40 Conclusions 41 3 Territorial Organization and Reorganization 45 The steps towards a federal solution 46 The distribution of powers 59 The institutions of the federal state 62 Financing the regions and communities 69 Dealing with conflicts 72 A peculiar federation 74 4 Political Parties 78 The political parties 78 Party organization 102 v Copyright material – 9781137029607 vi Contents Party finance 109 Conclusions 112 5 Voting and Elections 113 The electoral system 113 Election results 128 Substate elections 140 Local elections 142 Conclusions 147 6 The Government 148 The procedure at the federal level 149 The role of the King 154 The procedure at the regional level 156 The mechanics of coalition formation 159 A difficult and lengthy process 168 The functioning of the government 170 The survival of the government 173 Governing at the local level 175 Conclusions 179 7 The Parliament 181 Two houses of the parliament 181 The legislative function 186 Controlling the government 191 The use of language 194 The members of parliament 194 The regional parliaments 199 Conclusions 200 8 Policymaking 201 The political parties again 202 Segmental autonomy or pillarization 204 The social partnership 205 The social security system 209 The economic structure 217 The economic policies of the regions 221 Conclusions 224 Copyright material – 9781137029607 Contents vii 9 Belgium in the World 225 The world in Belgium 225 Belgium big in Africa 228 Belgium in Europe and Europe in Belgium 233 The substate level abroad 237 Between principles and reality 240 Conclusions 241 10 Still Belgium? 242 Two stories 242 Distrust at the top 247 The uneasy consociation 249 New institutions and capacity for decision-making 252 Still Belgium? 256 Bibliography 261 Index 277 Copyright material – 9781137029607 Chapter 1 Why Belgium? Who needs Belgium? In December 2011 Socialist Elio Di Rupo took the oath as the new Prime Minister of Belgium. This was a quite remarkable event. For the first time since 1972 a Walloon, an inhabitant of the southern French-speaking region of Belgium, took charge of the federal government. Elio Di Rupo is the son of Italian immi- grants, making him also the first ‘new Belgian’ to achieve the highest executive position. Most important, however, is the fact that it took no less than 541 days to put together his six-party coalition. This is a world record that is likely to remain unbroken for a while, unless of course Belgium breaks it again. The extremely long process of forming a government that started after the federal elections of June 2010 followed quite a few years of turmoil. After a period of relative stability, during which, between 1991 and 2007, four consecutive governments completely fulfilled their four-year mandate, 2007 marked the beginning of a new period of instability and gridlock and fierce discussions about language, territory and even the very survival of the country. The formation of a federal coalition after the elec- tions of June 2007 took had taken 194 days and the government sworn in at the end of 2007 was only a transition cabinet, replaced by a new one in March 2008. Allegations that Prime Minister Leterme had interfered in a law case questioning the way in which the Fortis Bank had been dismantled to avoid bankruptcy forced him to resign in December 2008. He was replaced by Herman Van Rompuy, who handed the position back to Leterme when he was called to become the first president of the European Council in November 2009. But Leterme’s government fell apart in April 2010 after failing to find a solu- tion for the decades-old discussion about the boundaries of the Brussels electoral district. The early elections of June 2010 produced a quite spectacular result. The largest party of the 1 Copyright material – 9781137029607 2 The Politics of Belgium country was now the Flemish nationalist N-VA (Nieuw-Vlaamse Allantie), defending a thorough reorganization of the Belgian federal system into a loose confederation and, in the longer run, into full independence for Flanders. Attempts to form a coalition uniting the Francophone Socialist Party of Di Rupo and the N- VA of Bart De Wever proved extremely difficult. One even wondered whether a federal cabinet would ever be formed and whether Belgium would be able to survive as a country. Newspapers and discussion programmes on radio and television kept voicing strong opinions about the future of Belgium, rang- ing from splitting it up between France and the Netherlands, over the creation of an independent Flanders and a smaller Belgium composed of Wallonia and Brussels, to the fierce and emotional defence of the survival of the country. Voices defend- ing a final post-Belgium solution were stronger in Flanders; voices defending Belgium were stronger in the south and in Brus- sels. The idea of splitting the country was often referred to as Plan B, Plan A being the formation of a government. This was not the first time that existential debates about the very nature of the country had dominated the agenda. The 1970s and 1980s had already been rather difficult, eventually resulting in the transformation of a unitary Belgium into a federal state built on the language communities (and on their disagreement on internal boundaries and on the status of Brussels). Since 1995 Belgium has indeed been a federal state, and for a while that seemed to reduce the intensity of the conflict. But it came back full force. During these years of renewed tensions between the language groups in Belgium, the international press paid more attention than usual to Belgian politics. Many suggested that it might be time for Belgium to call it a day, to end the suffering and to split the country up. ‘Who needs Belgium?’ asked The Economist. This question is not easy to answer. But that is probably the case for most countries in the world. They happen to be on the map as a result of events and decisions that might possibly have been different but which define their very existence. In this chapter and throughout this book we will explain how and why Belgium is quite an interesting country. Obviously it is not its size that makes Belgium remarkable. It is indeed a small country, covering only 32,500 square kilometres and with 11 million inhabitants, hardly more than the population Copyright material – 9781137029607 Why Belgium? 3 of metropolitan Paris or Greater London. It holds 22 of the 736 seats in the European Parliament, or less than 3 per cent of the total number. Yet in the context of the European Union (EU) Belgium is more than just a small country. One could almost say that Belgium’s capital city, Brussels, simply is the EU. Brussels is where important political meetings are organized. Brussels is where the Commission has its headquarters. And Belgian politi- cians are quite visible in the EU, although they have also some- times missed a few opportunities to become really big in Europe. Former Prime Minister Jean-Luc Dehaene had strongly impressed his colleagues with the way in which he had chaired the EU in 1993. He was a man who could succeed Jacques Delors as the president of the Commission.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diapositive 1
    Médiamètre politique RTBF-Auxipress Février 2013 Ministres, secrétaires d’Etat et Présidents de parti Médiamètre politique RTBF-Auxipress Février 2013 Commentaires Bart De Wever revient petit à petit mais sûrement aux devants des médias. Au mois de janvier, il était 2ème loin derrière Di Rupo, le médiamètre du mois de février révèle-t-il plus? Le taux d’occupation des médias d’Elio Di Rupo chute de façon spectaculaire puisqu’en janvier, il dépassait en effet les 12% et qu’au mois de février, il atteint 7,9%. Bart De Wever se maintient en 2ème place, perd beaucoup moins en visibilité que Di Rupo aussi mais dépasse le Premier Ministre dans la presse écrite. Didier Reynders monte sur la 3ème place du podium alors que Kris Peeters est relégué en 8ème place, ce que l’on peut considérer comme un très mauvais score si on analyse sa présence médiatique sur les 3 dernières années. Quelles sont les surprises de ce mois de février? Paul Magnette est toujours dans le top 10 malgré sa sortie du gouvernement fédéral. Il faut dire qu’il a repris la Présidence du PS et que, dans ce registre, il est sans aucun doute plus présent médiatiquement que son prédécesseur Thierry Giet. Il faut également souligné son implication médiatique dans l’annonce des licenciements chez Caterpillar. Hendrik Bogaert, secrétaire d’Etat à la fonction publique, pointe en 9ème place en raison de la fronde des syndicats fâchés de sa politique qui prône la réduction des effectifs et des moyens dans les services publics. Jean-Marc Nollet, Vice-Président et Ministre du développement durable du gouvernement wallon, pointe en 14ème place, secoué par la cacophonie en matière de politique énergétique wallonne.
    [Show full text]
  • Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship
    INFORMATION, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE FOR THE PARLIAMENT INFORMATION AND RESEARCH SERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY ISSN 1328-7478 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 2003 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. While great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Information and Research Services (IRS). Advice on legislation or legal policy issues contained in this paper is provided for use in parliamentary debate and for related parliamentary purposes. This paper is not professional legal opinion. Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. IRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 2003 I NFORMATION AND R ESEARCH S ERVICES Research Paper No. 4 2002–03 Politician Overboard: Jumping the Party Ship Sarah Miskin Politics and Public Administration Group 24 March 2003 Acknowledgments I would like to thank Martin Lumb and Janet Wilson for their help with the research into party defections in Australia and Cathy Madden, Scott Bennett, David Farrell and Ben Miskin for reading and commenting on early drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Cleavages, Political Institutions and Party Systems: Putting Preferences Back Into the Fundamental Equation of Politics A
    SOCIAL CLEAVAGES, POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS AND PARTY SYSTEMS: PUTTING PREFERENCES BACK INTO THE FUNDAMENTAL EQUATION OF POLITICS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Heather M. Stoll December 2004 c Copyright by Heather M. Stoll 2005 All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. David D. Laitin, Principal Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Beatriz Magaloni-Kerpel I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Morris P. Fiorina Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies. iii iv Abstract Do the fundamental conflicts in democracies vary? If so, how does this variance affect the party system? And what determines which conflicts are salient where and when? This dis- sertation explores these questions in an attempt to revitalize debate about the neglected (if not denigrated) part of the fundamental equation of politics: preferences. While the com- parative politics literature on political institutions such as electoral systems has exploded in the last two decades, the same cannot be said for the variable that has been called social cleavages, political cleavages, ideological dimensions, and—most generally—preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses
    Working Paper Series in European Studies Volume 1, Number 3 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses DR. SIMON HIX DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom ([email protected]) EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE: GILLES BOUSQUET KEITH COHEN COLLEEN DUNLAVY ANDREAS KAZAMIAS LEON LINDBERG ELAINE MARKS ANNE MINER ROBERT OSTERGREN MARK POLLACK GREGORY SHAFFER MARC SILBERMAN JONATHAN ZEITLIN Copyright © 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this paper may be reproduced in any form without permission of the author. European Studies Program, International Institute, University of Wisconsin--Madison Madison, Wisconsin http://polyglot.lss.wisc.edu/eur/ 1 Dimensions and Alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses Simon Hix Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom Abstract As the European Union (EU) has evolved, the study agenda has shifted from ‘European integration’ to ‘EU politics’. Missing from this new agenda, however, is an understanding of the ‘cognitive constraints’ on actors, and how actors respond: i.e. the shape of the EU ‘political space’ and the location of social groups and competition between actors within this space. The article develops a theoretical framework for understanding the shape of the EU political space (the interaction between an Integration-Independence and a Left-Right dimension and the location of class and sectoral groups within this map), and tests this framework on the policy positions of the Socialist, Christian Democrat and Liberal party leaders between 1976 and 1994 (using the techniques of the ECPR Party Manifestos Group Project).
    [Show full text]
  • ESS9 Appendix A3 Political Parties Ed
    APPENDIX A3 POLITICAL PARTIES, ESS9 - 2018 ed. 3.0 Austria 2 Belgium 4 Bulgaria 7 Croatia 8 Cyprus 10 Czechia 12 Denmark 14 Estonia 15 Finland 17 France 19 Germany 20 Hungary 21 Iceland 23 Ireland 25 Italy 26 Latvia 28 Lithuania 31 Montenegro 34 Netherlands 36 Norway 38 Poland 40 Portugal 44 Serbia 47 Slovakia 52 Slovenia 53 Spain 54 Sweden 57 Switzerland 58 United Kingdom 61 Version Notes, ESS9 Appendix A3 POLITICAL PARTIES ESS9 edition 3.0 (published 10.12.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Denmark, Iceland. ESS9 edition 2.0 (published 15.06.20): Changes from previous edition: Additional countries: Croatia, Latvia, Lithuania, Montenegro, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden. Austria 1. Political parties Language used in data file: German Year of last election: 2017 Official party names, English 1. Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs (SPÖ) - Social Democratic Party of Austria - 26.9 % names/translation, and size in last 2. Österreichische Volkspartei (ÖVP) - Austrian People's Party - 31.5 % election: 3. Freiheitliche Partei Österreichs (FPÖ) - Freedom Party of Austria - 26.0 % 4. Liste Peter Pilz (PILZ) - PILZ - 4.4 % 5. Die Grünen – Die Grüne Alternative (Grüne) - The Greens – The Green Alternative - 3.8 % 6. Kommunistische Partei Österreichs (KPÖ) - Communist Party of Austria - 0.8 % 7. NEOS – Das Neue Österreich und Liberales Forum (NEOS) - NEOS – The New Austria and Liberal Forum - 5.3 % 8. G!LT - Verein zur Förderung der Offenen Demokratie (GILT) - My Vote Counts! - 1.0 % Description of political parties listed 1. The Social Democratic Party (Sozialdemokratische Partei Österreichs, or SPÖ) is a social above democratic/center-left political party that was founded in 1888 as the Social Democratic Worker's Party (Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei, or SDAP), when Victor Adler managed to unite the various opposing factions.
    [Show full text]
  • From an Institutionalized Manifest Catholic to a Latent Christian Pillar
    Karel Dobbelaere1 Оригинални научни рад Catholic University of Leuven and University of Antwerp, Belgium UDK 322(493) RELIGION AND POLITICS IN BELGIUM: FROM AN INSTITUTIONALIZED MANIFEST CATHOLIC TO A LATENT CHRISTIAN PILLAR Abstract After having described the historical basis of the process of pillarization in Belgium, the author explains the emergence of the Catholic pillar as a defence mechanism of the Catholic Church and the Catholic leadership to protect the Catholic flock from sec- ularization. He describes the different services the Catholic pillar was offering for its members and the development of Belgium as a state based on three pillars: the catho- lic, the socialist and the liberal one that were all three institutionalized. This structure meant that Belgium was rather a segregated country that was vertically integrated. In the sixties of last century, the pillar was confronted with a growing secularization of the population, which forced the leadership of the pillar to adapt the collective con- sciousness: the Catholic credo, values and norms were replaced by so-called typical values of the Gospel integrated in what is called a Socio-Cultural Christianity. Under the impact of the changing economic situation, the politicization of the Flemish ques- tion and the emergence of Ecologist parties, the Christian pillar had to adapt its serv- ices and is now based on clienteles rather than members. Only in the Flemish part of Belgium is it still an institutionalized pillar. Key words: Collective Consciousness, Pillarization; Pillar; Institutionalized Pillar, Solidarity: Mechanical and Organic Solidarity,Vertical pluralism, Secularization. The concept of ‘pillar’ and the process of ‘pillarization’ are translations of the Dutch terms zuil and zuilvorming to describe the special structure of vertical pluralism typical of Dutch society.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgian Identity Politics: at a Crossroad Between Nationalism and Regionalism
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2014 Belgian identity politics: At a crossroad between nationalism and regionalism Jose Manuel Izquierdo University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Human Geography Commons Recommended Citation Izquierdo, Jose Manuel, "Belgian identity politics: At a crossroad between nationalism and regionalism. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2014. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2871 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Jose Manuel Izquierdo entitled "Belgian identity politics: At a crossroad between nationalism and regionalism." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. Micheline van Riemsdijk, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Derek H. Alderman, Monica Black Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Belgian identity politics: At a crossroad between nationalism and regionalism A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Jose Manuel Izquierdo August 2014 Copyright © 2014 by Jose Manuel Izquierdo All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • De Vlaams-Nationalistische Partijen En Organisaties Bruno De Wever En Koen De Scheemaeker
    808 Bronnen van privé-instellingen 5.5. Bronnenpublicaties Documents sur la fondation du pcb, in Cahiers marxistes, 1971, speciaal nummer. In de nrs. 2 (p. 43-47), 9 (p. 44-54) en 10 (p. 71-88) van hetzelfde tijdschrift worden eveneens documenten gepubliceerd die betrekking hebben op de ontstaans periode van de kpb. “ Le Drapeau Rouge ” clandestin. Brussel, 1971. De klandestiene “ Roode Vaan ”. Brussel, 1971. Alphonse Bonenfast. Rapport sur la dissidence grippiste (1968), in Cahiers marxistes, 2002, nr. 222. 6. De Vlaams-nationalistische partijen en organisaties Bruno De Wever en Koen De Scheemaeker 6.1. Bibliografie Courrier hebdomadaire du CRISP wijdde talrijke artikels aan Vlaams-nationalis- tische partijen en organisaties na de Tweede Wereldoorlog : 1962, nrs. 148 & 169 ; 1964, nr. 230 ; 1966, nrs. 336 & 345 ; 1973, nrs. 604 & 606 ; 1992, nr. 1356 ; 1993, nrs. 1416-1417, 2002, nr. 1748. De Wever (Br.). Greep naar de macht. Vlaams-nationalisme en Nieuwe Orde. Het VNV 1933-1945. Tielt-Gent, 1994. De Wever (Br.), Vrints (A.). Vlaams-nationalisme. Natievorming, ideologie en politieke stroming, in Sanders (L.), Devos (C.), eds. Politieke ideologieën in Vlaanderen. Antwerpen, 2008. De Wever (Ba.). Het Vlaams-nationalisme na de Tweede Wereldoorlog. Verrij- zenis of herrijzenis ?, in Bijdragen tot de Eigentijdse Geschiedenis, 1997, nr. 3, p. 277-290. De Winter (L.). The Volksunie and the dilemma between policy succes and elec- toral survival in Flanders, in Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London, 1998, p. 28-50. Nieuwe Encyclopedie van de Vlaamse Beweging. Tielt, 1998 bevat ingangen op alle Vlaams-nationalistische partijen en organisaties, een overzichtsartikel over Vlaams-nationalistische partijen (B.
    [Show full text]
  • War Occ Pation Liberation
    WAR OCC PATION LIBERATION Belgium WAR 1940—1945 OCC PATION LIBERATION Wannes Devos Kevin Gony (eds.) www.lannoo.com Register on our website to regularly receive a newsletter with information about new books and interesting exclusive offers. Final editing Wannes Devos Kevin Gony Photo editing Luc Vandeweghe Translations Altair Vertalingen bvba Cover design Studio Lannoo (Mieke Verloigne) Cover photos Belgian refugees, ca. 1940 (War Heritage Institute) Layout Keppie & Keppie © Lannoo Publishers nv, Tielt, 2019 and the authors D/2019/45/343 – ISBN 978 94 014 5909 9 – NUR 689 All rights reserved. Nothing of this publication may be reproduced, stored in an automated database and/or made public in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. CONTENTS PREFACE 9 Michel Jaupart CONTEXT 13 THE SECOND WORLD WAR IN PERSPECTIVE Luc De Vos INTRODUCTION 19 THE SECOND WORLD WAR IN PARTS Wannes Devos 1 FROM ONE WAR TO THE OTHER 27 • TWENTY YEARS OF PEACE? BELGIAN INTERWAR POLICY 29 Catherine Lanneau • THE IMPLICATIONS OF CONTROLLING THE RHINE 38 Anne Godfroid • MULTILATERALISM OR ECONOMIC DIPLOMACY? THE BELGIAN MISSION(S) IN ETHIOPIA 40 Manuel Duran • WIFE AND MOTHER: WOMEN IN THE NEW ORDER 43 Christine Van Everbroeck • A PRINCE AND HIS ARMY: THE KING, THE BELGIAN ARMY AND THE GOVERNMENT 51 Jean-Michel Sterkendries • THE BELGIAN BUNKER LINES: MANY FEET IN THE SOIL 57 Erik Janssen • THE 1939 MOBILISATION: WERE THEY PREPARED? 60 Pierre Lierneux 5 2 WAR AND COMBAT 63 • MAY 1940: THE
    [Show full text]
  • Plenumvergadering Séance Plénière
    PLENUMVERGADERING SÉANCE PLÉNIÈRE van du DONDERDAG 26 JUNI 2008 JEUDI 26 JUIN 2008 Avond Soir ______ ______ De vergadering wordt geopend om 18.22 uur. In de regeringsbanken hebben plaatsgenomen de heren Yves Leterme, eerste minister, Didier Reynders, vice-eerste minister en minister van Financiën en Institutionele Hervormingen, Patrick Dewael, vice-eerste minister en minister van Binnenlandse Zaken, Joëlle Milquet, vice-eerste minister en minister van Werk en Gelijke Kansen, Karel De Gucht, minister van Buitenlanse Zaken, Marie Arena, minister van Maatschappelijke Integratie, Pensioenen en Grote Steden, Pieter De Crem, minister van Landsverdediging, Vincent Van Quickenborne, minister van Ondernemen en Vereenvoudigen en Melchior Wathelet, staatssecretaris voor Begroting, toegevoegd aan de eerste minister, en staatssecretaris voor Gezinsbeleid, toegevoegd aan de minister van Werk, en wat de aspecten inzake personen- en familierecht betreft, toegevoegd aan minister van Justitie. La séance est ouverte à 18.22 heures. Ont pris place au banc du gouvernement MM. Yves Leterme, premier ministre, Didier Reynders, vice-premier ministre et ministre des Finances et des Réformes institutionnelles, Patrick Dewael, vice-premier ministre et ministre de l'Intérieur, Joëlle Milquet, vice- première ministre et ministre de l'Emploi et de l'Égalité des chances, Karel De Gucht, ministre des Affaires étrangères, Marie Arena, ministre de l'Intégration sociale, des Pensions et des Grandes villes, Pieter De Crem, ministre de la Défense, Vincent Van Quickenborne, ministre pour l'Entreprise et la Simplification et Melchior Wathelet, secrétaire d'État au Budget, adjoint au premier ministre, et secrétaire d'État à la Politique des familles, adjoint à la ministre de l'Emploi, et en ce qui concerne les aspects du droit des personnes et de la famille, adjoint au ministre de la Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenger Party List
    Appendix List of Challenger Parties Operationalization of Challenger Parties A party is considered a challenger party if in any given year it has not been a member of a central government after 1930. A party is considered a dominant party if in any given year it has been part of a central government after 1930. Only parties with ministers in cabinet are considered to be members of a central government. A party ceases to be a challenger party once it enters central government (in the election immediately preceding entry into office, it is classified as a challenger party). Participation in a national war/crisis cabinets and national unity governments (e.g., Communists in France’s provisional government) does not in itself qualify a party as a dominant party. A dominant party will continue to be considered a dominant party after merging with a challenger party, but a party will be considered a challenger party if it splits from a dominant party. Using this definition, the following parties were challenger parties in Western Europe in the period under investigation (1950–2017). The parties that became dominant parties during the period are indicated with an asterisk. Last election in dataset Country Party Party name (as abbreviation challenger party) Austria ALÖ Alternative List Austria 1983 DU The Independents—Lugner’s List 1999 FPÖ Freedom Party of Austria 1983 * Fritz The Citizens’ Forum Austria 2008 Grüne The Greens—The Green Alternative 2017 LiF Liberal Forum 2008 Martin Hans-Peter Martin’s List 2006 Nein No—Citizens’ Initiative against
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Belgium Country Report | SGI Sustainable Governance Indicators
    Sustainable Governance Indicators SGI 2015 Belgium Report Micael Castanheira, Benoît Rihoux, Nils C. Bandelow (Coordinator) SGI 2015 | 2 Belgium Report Executive Summary Belgium, located in the heart of Europe, is a small country with 11.1 million inhabitants. In 2013, its gross domestic product (GDP) was €395 billion at market prices (i.e. 14.5% above the 2007 pre-crisis level of €345 billion; data from the Belgian National Bank). Belgium has shown itself to be one of the good performers in the euro area in recent years. According to Eurostat data, Belgium’s purchasing power per capita is about 10.2% above the euro area average, and 19% above the EU28 average. Belgium also boasts an extremely open economy, with the sum of imports and exports amounting to 170% of GDP; the country’s trade balance is slightly positive. The unemployment rate was 8.5% in September 2014, which is below the euro area average (11.5%). Belgium is thus economically rather healthy, although not among the best performing economies of the EU. It boasts a highly educated population, attracts substantial foreign direct investment, maintains high-quality hospitals, has a healthy housing market (i.e. it did not crash during the financial crisis, but recent estimates still suggest some overvaluation of the market) and overall manages a well-performing economy. With its comprehensive road, rail, water and information technology networks, in addition to its world-class harbors, Belgium provides direct access to and from the rest of the world into Europe. Its openness in terms of trade and high reliance on exports implies that Belgian companies must remain competitive or face losing their market position.
    [Show full text]