Integrated Management of Non-Native Plants in Natural Areas of Florida1 Stephen F

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrated Management of Non-Native Plants in Natural Areas of Florida1 Stephen F SP 242 Integrated Management of Non-Native Plants in Natural Areas of Florida1 Stephen F. Enloe, Ken Langeland, Jason Ferrell, Brent Sellers, and Greg MacDonald2 Introduction Regardless of how they arrived, these 1,400+ non-native plants grew so well in Florida that they established and Florida’s natural areas encompass an incredible diversity reproduced on their own and spread into natural areas. of native plants and animals and provide a wide array of Out of these 1,400+ species, approximately 165 (11%) are ecosystem services that benefit Florida greatly. Within the considered invasive and may disrupt ecosystem services state, there are almost ten million acres of local, state, and vital to the integrity of Florida natural areas (FLEPPC federal public lands currently managed as natural areas for 2017). Among these, approximately 100 species require conservation. While natural areas are conservation lands aggressive management. that have been set aside for the purpose of preserving (or restoring) native plant and animal communities, they do Management of invasive vegetation in natural areas require active management. One of the greatest manage- requires control methods that will minimize damage to ment issues in natural areas is invasive plants. Invasive non-target vegetation and soil. This need for caution often plants are species that are not native to the ecosystem under necessitates more time and effort than weed management consideration and whose introduction causes or is likely to in agricultural, industrial, or right-of-way settings does. cause economic or environmental harm or harm to human Certain types of vegetation, such as woody or sprawling health. Invasive plants represent a subset of non-native vegetation, may require removal of standing plant material plants that have been introduced into Florida. Of the even after they have been killed if the presence of standing approximately 4,798 plant species growing without cultiva- material increases fire hazard, reduces aesthetic appeal, tion in Florida, 31% are non-native (Wunderlin et al. 2018). or has the potential to cause harm as it decays and falls. Many of these non-native plants were originally introduced Control methods include cultural, preventative, manual, as garden ornamentals, agricultural crops, forages, or soil and mechanical removal, biological control, physical stabilizers. Others were accidentally introduced as con- controls, and herbicides. Generally, these tools are utilized taminants of seed or as hitchhikers on animals or materials. as part of a comprehensive management plan that considers 1. This document is SP 242, one of a series of the Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date January 1997. Revised July 2018. The original document was prepared in cooperation with the Metropolitan Dade County Park and Recreation Department, Natural Areas Management, and the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Stephen F. Enloe, associate professor; Ken Langeland, professor emeritus; Jason Ferrell, professor, Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants; Brent Sellers, professor, Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Range Cattle Research and Education Center; and Greg MacDonald, professor, Agronomy Department, UF/IFAS Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants; UF/IFAS Extension, Gainesville, FL 32611. The use of trade names in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information. UF/IFAS does not guarantee or warranty the products named, and references to them in this publication do not signify our approval to the exclusion of other products of suitable composition. All chemicals should be used in accordance with directions on the manufacturer’s label. Use pesticides safely. Read and follow directions on the manufacturer’s label. The Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) is an Equal Opportunity Institution authorized to provide research, educational information and other services only to individuals and institutions that function with non-discrimination with respect to race, creed, color, religion, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, political opinions or affiliations. For more information on obtaining other UF/IFAS Extension publications, contact your county’s UF/IFAS Extension office. U.S. Department of Agriculture, UF/IFAS Extension Service, University of Florida, IFAS, Florida A & M University Cooperative Extension Program, and Boards of County Commissioners Cooperating. Nick T. Place, dean for UF/IFAS Extension. a wide range of issues to control invasive plants and protect Plant species included in this publication are not limited the native plants of a given natural area. These tools are not to either of these lists. They are included because they have silver bullets and cannot be expected to solve invasive plant warranted control measures in at least one natural area problems with a one-time shot. Eradication, which is the in the state and should be viewed as potentially invasive complete elimination of all living propagules of a species, is in other natural areas. Some of the plants are still used in extremely difficult and often infeasible for well-established landscaping and sold in the nursery industry. invasive plants. Without a clear management plan and long-term commitment, most single invasive plant control Mention of species in this publication does not necessarily efforts result in short-lived success. mean UF/IFAS recommends limitation of their use. The UF/IFAS Assessment of Non-Native Plants in Florida’s This publication provides land managers in Florida with Natural Areas is used by UF/IFAS to evaluate the invasive- current methods used to manage non-native plants. It does ness of non-native plants in Florida relative to UF/IFAS not address identification of plant species. For information recommendations. The results of this assessment can on identification and recognition of many invasive plant be viewed on the UF/IFAS Assessment website: https:// species, consult Identification and Biology of Nonnative assessment.ifas.ufl.edu/. The UF/IFAS assessment is not Plants in Florida’s Natural Areas, 2nd Ed. by K. A. Langeland, regulatory. However, all UF/IFAS employees are required H. M. Cherry, C. M. McCormick, and K. A. Craddock to follow the results of the assessment when making plant Burks (2008), which is available from the UF/IFAS Exten- species recommendations. sion Bookstore (http://ifasbooks.ifas.ufl.edu). Finally, the removal of vegetation in certain areas such Regulatory Agencies, Permits, as public waters and wetlands is regulated by state and local agencies. A permit may be required. For questions Plant Lists, and the UF/IFAS regarding permits to control vegetation in public waters, Assessment please visit the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section website: There has been much confusion over the legal ramifications http://www.myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/invasive-plants/. of listing certain plants as invasive. The best example of this The FWC Invasive Plant Management Section is the lead is the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council (FLEPPC) Invasive agency in Florida responsible for coordinating and funding Plant List. FLEPPC is a nonprofit professional organiza- two statewide programs that control invasive upland and tion founded in 1984 to increase public awareness of the aquatic plants on public conservation lands and waterways significant threat that non-native invasive plant species throughout the state. The agency also ensures that pose to native species, communities, and ecosystems, and beneficial native aquatic plants in Florida’s ponds, lakes, to develop integrated management and control strategies to and rivers are protected through permitting programs and halt the spread of exotic species in natural areas. FLEPPC funding of research to find more cost-effective management maintains a list of plant species considered by a committee techniques. of botanists, ecologists, and land managers to be invasive in Florida. This list is available on the FLEPPC website (http:// For regulatory questions regarding vegetation control in www.fleppc.org). The purpose of the FLEPPC list is to alert wetlands, contact the Water Management District (WMD) land managers to plant species that have demonstrated in which you are located. These can be found at the invasiveness in Florida. However, the list does not have Florida Department of Environmental Protection website: statutory authority. https://floridadep.gov/water-policy/water-policy/content/ water-management-districts. Plants that are legally regulated by statute are listed on the Florida Noxious Weed List, which can be found on Acknowledgements the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services website (http://www.freshfromflorida.com/ The following individuals have provided information for Divisions-Offices/Plant-Industry/Bureaus-and-Services/ this or previous editions of Integrated Management of Bureau-of-Entomology-Nematology-Plant-Pathology/ Nonnative Plants in Natural Areas of Florida: Mike Bodle, Botany/Noxious-Weeds). There may also be local, county, Jim Burney, Mathew Cole, Rodell Collins, Jim Cuda, or city ordinances regarding certain plants, but they are Scott Ditmarsen, Jim Duquesnel, Roger Hammer, Dallas beyond the scope of this publication. Hazelton, Jeff Hutchinson, Greg Jubinsky, Chris Key, Bill Kline, Mike Link, Mark Ludlow, Joe Maguire, Chris Marble, Integrated
Recommended publications
  • ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY, TOXICITY and CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION of EXTRACTS of Indigofera Lupatana BAKER F
    ANTI-MICROBIAL ACTIVITY, TOXICITY AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF EXTRACTS OF Indigofera lupatana BAKER F. PLANT SOSPETER NGOCI NJERU A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment for the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science in Biochemistry of Egerton University EGERTON UNIVERSITY OCTOBER, 2010. DECLARATION AND RECOMMENDATION Declaration This thesis is my original work and has not been presented, wholly or in part, for an award of degree in any other university. Signature……………………..…………………………...Date…………………………… Sospeter Ngoci Njeru. SM14/1873/07 Recommendation We wish to confirm that this thesis was carried out under our supervision and has our approval to be presented for examination as per the Egerton University regulations. Signature………………………………………………….Date…………………………… Prof. Matasyoh J.C. Department of Chemistry Egerton University Signature……………………………………………...…Date…………………………… Dr. Mwendia C. M. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Egerton University Signature……………………………………………...…Date…………………………… Dr. Mwaniki C. G. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Egerton University ii COPYRIGHT All rights reserved. No part of this thesis may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or otherwise, without permission from the author. Sospeter Ngoci Njeru© 2010 iii DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my parents; Humphrey Njeru and Margaret Njeru, my wife Abishag Ngoci, my sister Flora Muthoni; Luke, Deborah and other siblings. Your constant inspiration, encouragements and support made this work successful. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT My sincere thanks go to Prof. Matasyoh J.C., Dr. Mwendia C. M. and Dr. Mwaniki C. G. for accepting to supervise this work and for their invaluable advice, professional insight, guidance, positive criticism, and constructive comments throughout the course of the study.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Leafy Plants from Mexico As Sources of Antioxidant Compounds, and Their Nutritional, Nutraceutical and Antimicrobial Potential: a Review
    antioxidants Review Edible Leafy Plants from Mexico as Sources of Antioxidant Compounds, and Their Nutritional, Nutraceutical and Antimicrobial Potential: A Review Lourdes Mateos-Maces 1, José Luis Chávez-Servia 2,* , Araceli Minerva Vera-Guzmán 2 , Elia Nora Aquino-Bolaños 3 , Jimena E. Alba-Jiménez 4 and Bethsabe Belem Villagómez-González 2 1 Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Genética, Colegio de Posgraduados, Carr. México-Texcoco Km. 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco 56230, Mexico; [email protected] 2 CIIDIR-Oaxaca, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México 07738, Mexico; [email protected] (A.M.V.-G.); [email protected] (B.B.V.-G.) 3 Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de Alimentos, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa-Enríquez 1090, Mexico; [email protected] 4 CONACyT-Centro de Investigación y Desarrollo de Alimentos, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa-Enríquez 1090, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 May 2020; Accepted: 13 June 2020; Published: 20 June 2020 Abstract: A review of indigenous Mexican plants with edible stems and leaves and their nutritional and nutraceutical potential was conducted, complemented by the authors’ experiences. In Mexico, more than 250 species with edible stems, leaves, vines and flowers, known as “quelites,” are collected or are cultivated and consumed. The assessment of the quelite composition depends on the chemical characteristics of the compounds being evaluated; the protein quality is a direct function of the amino acid content, which is evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and the contribution of minerals is evaluated by atomic absorption spectrometry, inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) or ICP mass spectrometry. The total contents of phenols, flavonoids, carotenoids, saponins and other general compounds have been analyzed using UV-vis spectrophotometry and by HPLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Release of the Insects Calophya Latiforceps
    United States Department of Field Release of the Insects Agriculture Calophya latiforceps Marketing and Regulatory (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Programs Pseudophilothrips ichini Animal and Plant Health Inspection (Thysanoptera: Service Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Field Release of the Insects Calophya latiforceps (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) and Pseudophilothrips ichini (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae) for Classical Biological Control of Brazilian Peppertree in the Contiguous United States Environmental Assessment, May 2019 Agency Contact: Colin D. Stewart, Assistant Director Pests, Pathogens, and Biocontrol Permits Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service U.S. Department of Agriculture 4700 River Rd., Unit 133 Riverdale, MD 20737 Non-Discrimination Policy The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination against its customers, employees, and applicants for employment on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, gender identity, religion, reprisal, and where applicable, political beliefs, marital status, familial or parental status, sexual orientation, or all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program, or protected genetic information in employment or in any program or activity conducted or funded by the Department. (Not all prohibited bases will apply to all programs and/or employment activities.) To File an Employment Complaint If you wish to file an employment complaint, you must contact your agency's EEO Counselor (PDF) within 45 days of the date of the alleged discriminatory act, event, or in the case of a personnel action. Additional information can be found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_file.html.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Breading
    SNA Research Conference Vol. 52 2007 Plant Breeding and Evaluation Tom Ranney Section Editor and Moderator Plant Breeding and Evaluation Section 326 SNA Research Conference Vol. 52 2007 New Callicarpa Species with Breeding Potential Ryan N. Contreras and John M. Ruter University of Georgia, Dept. of Horticulture, Tifton, GA 31793 [email protected] Index Words: beautyberry, species evaluation, ornamental plant breeding Significance to Industry: There is a great deal of available Callicarpa L. germplasm that has yet to be utilized by the nursery industry in the U.S. Taxa currently being evaluated are likely to have potential as breeding material or direct commercial marketability. With new breeding material and selections for introduction the number of beautyberry cultivars for use in southeastern gardens has the potential to expand greatly. Nature of Work: Callicarpa L. is a genus of ~150 species of shrubs and trees distributed throughout the world including warm-temperate and tropical America, SE Asia, Malaysia, Pacific Islands, and Australia (5) with the greatest concentration of species found in SE Asia, specifically the Philippine Islands (1). Of the New World species the highest concentration occurs in Cuba, with ~20 native species (1). There are currently four species commonly found in cultivation in the U.S.: C. americana L., C. bodinieri Lév., C. dichotoma (Lour.)K.Koch, and C. japonica Thunb. with a limited number of varieties or cultivars of each to choose from (3). Beautyberries, desired primarily for their handsome berries produced in fall, have been selected for white-fruiting varieties, finer textured varieties, increased berry production, and variegated foliage.
    [Show full text]
  • Show Activity
    A Cytochrome-P450-Inhibitor *Unless otherwise noted all references are to Duke, James A. 1992. Handbook of phytochemical constituents of GRAS herbs and other economic plants. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press. Plant # Chemicals Total PPM Acacia farnesiana Huisache; Cassie; Popinac; Sweet Acacia; Opopanax 2 Achillea millefolium Yarrow; Milfoil 1 Acorus calamus Flagroot; Sweetroot; Sweet Calamus; Myrtle Flag; Calamus; Sweetflag 1 384.0 Agastache rugosa 1 Ageratum conyzoides Mexican ageratum 1 Aloysia citrodora Lemon Verbena 1 Alpinia officinarum Lesser Galangal; Chinese Ginger 1 800.0 Alpinia galanga Siamese Ginger; Languas; Greater Galangal 1 24000.0 Ammi majus Bishop's Weed 2 16000.0 Anacardium occidentale Cashew 1 Anethum graveolens Garden Dill; Dill 1 Angelica dahurica Bai Zhi 2 Angelica archangelica Angelica; Wild Parsnip; Garden Angelica 2 5050.0 Apium graveolens Celery 3 Artemisia dracunculus Tarragon 2 141.0 Boronia megastigma Scented Boronia 1 Calamintha nepeta Turkish Calamint 1 Camellia sinensis Tea 2 Cananga odorata Cananga; Ylang-Ylang 1 Capsicum frutescens Tabasco; Cayenne; Chili; Hot Pepper; Spur Pepper; Red Chili 1 35800.0 Capsicum annuum Cherry Pepper; Cone Pepper; Paprika; Bell Pepper; Sweet Pepper; Green Pepper 2 8000.0 Centaurea calcitrapa Star-Thistle 1 Chenopodium album Lambsquarter 1 Cinnamomum verum Ceylon Cinnamon; Cinnamon 1 20320.0 Cinnamomum camphora Camphor; Ho Leaf 1 Cinnamomum aromaticum Cassia Lignea; Chinese Cassia; Chinesischer Zimtbaum (Ger.); Canela de la China (Sp.); 1 Saigon Cinnamon; Chinazimt (Ger.); Kashia-Keihi
    [Show full text]
  • I N D E X Sporarum Et Seminum Quae Hortus Botanicus
    I N D E X SPORARUM ET SEMINUM QUAE HORTUS BOTANICUS INSTITUTI SUPERIORIS AGRONOMIAE PRO MUTUA COMMUTATIONE OFFERT ANNO 2021 Prof. Maria Romeiras Botanicae Professor Directorium Eng. Mª Teresa Vasconcelos Botanicae Arq. Pais. Ana Raquel Cunha Eng. Paulo Forte Isabel Fernandes Horti Praefectus, Seminum Curator, Seminum Collector DELECTUM SEMINUM DESIDERATORUM ANTE d. 30 Julii 2021 ROGAMUS [email protected] ebgconsortiumindexseminum2021 Ginkgoopsida Ginkgoaceae 101. Ginkgo biloba L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.101) Pinopsida Araucariaceae 102. Araucaria bidwillii Hook. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.102) Cupressaceae 103. Chamaecyparis formosensis Matsum. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.103) 104. Cupressus goveniana Gordon (XX-0-AJUDA-21.104) 105. Cupressus lusitanica Mill. var. lusitanica (XX-0-AJUDA-21.105) 106. Cupressus torulosa D.Don (XX-0-AJUDA-21.106) 107. Juniperus phoenicea L. var. turbinata (Guss.) Parl. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.107) 108. Platycladus orientalis (L.) Franco (XX-0-AJUDA-21.108) 109. Tetraclinis articulata (Vahl) Mast. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.109) Pinaceae 110. Cedrus deodara (Roxb.ex D.Don) G.Don (XX-0-AJUDA-21.110) Podocarpaceae 111. Afrocarpus mannii (Hook. f.) C.N.Page (XX-0-AJUDA-21.111) Taxaceae 112. Taxus baccata L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.112) Taxodiaceae 113. Cunninghamia konishii Hayata (XX-0-AJUDA-21.113) 114. Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.114) Gnetopsida Ephedraceae 115. Ephedra foeminea Forssk. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.115) Magnoliopsida Acanthaceae 116. Acanthus mollis L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.116) Aceraceae 117. Acer buergerianum Miq. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.117) 118. Acer campestre L. (XX-0-AJUDA-21.118) 119. Acer monspessulanum L.
    [Show full text]
  • Show Activity
    A CNS-Toxic *Unless otherwise noted all references are to Duke, James A. 1992. Handbook of phytochemical constituents of GRAS herbs and other economic plants. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press. Plant # Chemicals Total PPM Abies sachalinensis Shin-Yo-Yu; Japanese Fir 1 7560.0 Achillea moschata Iva 1 3708.0 Achillea millefolium Milfoil; Yarrow 1 550.0 Acinos suaveolens 1 Acinos alpinus Te de Sierra Nevada 1 Acorus calamus Calamus; Flagroot; Sweet Calamus; Sweetflag; Myrtle Flag; Sweetroot 1 Aframomum melegueta Melegueta Pepper; Malagueta (Sp.); Guinea Grains; Alligator Pepper; Malagettapfeffer (Ger.); Grains-of- 1 Paradise Ageratum conyzoides Mexican ageratum 1 Aloysia citrodora Lemon Verbena 1 Alpinia galanga Siamese Ginger; Languas; Greater Galangal 1 Amomum xanthioides Malabar Cardamom; Bastard Cardamom; Chin Kousha; Tavoy Cardamom 1 Amomum compactum Siam Cardamom; Java Cardamom; Chester Cardamom; Round Cardamom 1 Angelica archangelica Wild Parsnip; Garden Angelica; Angelica 1 Annona squamosa Sugar-Apple; Sweetsop 1 Aristolochia serpentaria Virginia Snakeroot; Serpentaria 1 Artemisia vulgaris Mugwort 1 Artemisia salsoloides 1 Artemisia herba-alba Desert Wormwood 1 638.0 Artemisia annua Annual Wormwood (GRIN); Annual Mugwort (GRIN); Qinghao; Sweet Annie; Sweet Wormwood (GRIN) 1 Calamintha nepeta Turkish Calamint 1 Callicarpa americana French Mulberry; American Beauty Berry; Beauty Berry 1 Cannabis sativa Hemp; Marijuana; Indian Hemp; Marihuana 1 Cedrus libani Cedar of Lebanon 1 Chamaemelum nobile Perennial Camomile; Garden Camomile; Roman Camomile
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes
    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region.
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Large.Pdf
    Gernot Katzer’s Spice List (http://gernot-katzers-spice-pages.com/engl/) 1/70 (November 2015) Important notice Copyright issues This document is a byproduct of my WWW spice pages. It lists names of spices in about 100 different languages as well as the sci- This document, whether printed or in machine-readable form, may entific names used by botanists and pharmacists, and gives for each be copied and distributed without charge, provided the above no- local name the language where it is taken from and the botanical tice and my address are retained. If the file content (not the layout) name. This index does not tell you whether the plant in question is is modified, this should be indicated in the header. discussed extensively or is just treated as a side-note in the context of another spice article. Employees of Microsoft Corporation are excluded from the Another point to make perfectly clear is that although I give my above paragraph. On all employees of Microsoft Corporation, a best to present only reliable information here, I can take no warrant licence charge of US$ 50 per copy for copying or distributing this of any kind that this file, or the list as printed, or my whole WEB file in all possible forms is levied. Failure to pay this licence charge pages or anything else of my spice collection are correct, harm- is liable to juristical prosecution; please contact me personally for less, acceptable for non-adults or suitable for any specific purpose. details and mode of paying. All other usage restrictions and dis- Remember: Anything free comes without guarantee! claimers decribed here apply unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Table of Herbs 'N Spices
    Periodic Table of Herbs 'N Spices 11HH 1 H 2 HeHe Element Proton Element Symbol Number Chaste Tree Chile (Vitex agnus-castus) (Capsicum frutescens et al.) Hemptree, Agnus Cayenne pepper, Chili castus, Abraham's balm 118Uuo Red pepper 33LiLi 44 Be 5 B B 66 C 7 N 7N 88O O 99 F 1010 Ne Ne Picture Bear’s Garlic Boldo leaves Ceylon Cinnamon Oregano Lime (Allium ursinum) (Peumus boldus) (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Nutmeg Origanum vulgare Fenugreek Lemon (Citrus aurantifolia) Ramson, Wild garlic Boldina, Baldina Sri Lanka cinnamon (Myristica fragrans) Oregan, Wild marjoram (Trigonella foenum-graecum) (Citrus limon) 11 Na Na 1212 Mg Mg 1313 Al Al 1414 Si Si 1515 P P 16 S S 1717 Cl Cl 1818 Ar Ar Common Name Scientific Name Nasturtium Alternate name(s) Allspice Sichuan Pepper et al. Grains of Paradise (Tropaeolum majus) (Pimenta dioica) (Zanthoxylum spp.) Perilla (Aframomum melegueta) Common nasturtium, Jamaica pepper, Myrtle Anise pepper, Chinese (Perilla frutescens) Guinea grains, Garden nasturtium, Mugwort pepper, Pimento, pepper, Japanese Beefsteak plant, Chinese Savory Cloves Melegueta pepper, Indian cress, Nasturtium (Artemisia vulgaris) Newspice pepper, et al. Basil, Wild sesame (Satureja hortensis) (Syzygium aromaticum) Alligator pepper 1919 K K 20 Ca Ca 2121 Sc Sc 2222 Ti Ti 23 V V 24 Cr Cr 2525 Mn Mn 2626 Fe Fe 2727 Co Co 2828 Ni Ni 29 Cu Cu 3030 Zn Zn 31 Ga Ga 3232 Ge Ge 3333As As 34 Se Se 3535 Br Br 36 Kr Kr Cassia Paprika Caraway (Cinnamomum cassia) Asafetida Coriander Nigella Cumin Gale Borage Kaffir Lime (Capsicum annuum) (Carum carvi)
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo: Sources, Processes and Possibilities for Bioregional Blue
    Indigo: Sources, processes and possibilities for bioregional blue Nicholas Wenner and Matthew Forkin November 2017 Photo by Kalie Cassel-Feiss by Kalie Photo Table of Contents Introduction . .3 Indigo . .4 The Indigo Process . 11 Conclusions . 15 Photo by Paige Green Green by Paige Photo Indigo Overview 2 Introduction his report was completed with funding generously provided by the Jena and Michael King TFoundation as part of Fibershed’s True Blue project . It is one project of many that support Fibershed’s larger mission: “Fibershed develops regional and regenerative fiber systems on behalf of independent working producers, by expanding opportunities to implement carbon farming, forming catalytic foundations to rebuild regional manufacturing, and through connecting end-users to farms and ranches through public education.” In this report we present the various sources of blue dye and of indigo, and motivate the use of plant-based indigo in particular . We also identify the limitations of natural dyes like indigo and the need for larger cultural and systemic shifts . The ideal indigo dye production system would be a closed-loop system that moves from soil to dye to textiles and back to soil . The indigo process has three basic steps: planting, harvesting, and dye extraction . In this document, we provide an overview of each, and detailed explorations are given in two separate documents that will be available through Fibershed by the end of 2017 . This report is based on a literature review of academic research, natural dye books, online content, and personal interviews . It benefited greatly from conversations with (and the generosity of) many skilled artisans and natural dyers, including Rowland Ricketts, Jane Palmer, and Kori Hargreaves .
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Pu'uhonua 0 Hiinaunau National
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa Technical Report 105 Vascular Plants of Pu'uhonua 0 Hiinaunau National Historical Park Technical Report 106 Birds of Pu'uhonua 0 Hiinaunau National Historical Park COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA Department of Botany 3 190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 (808) 956-8218 Clifford W. Smith, Unit Director Technical Report 105 VASCULAR PLANTS OF PU'UHONUA 0 HONAUNAU NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK Linda W. Pratt and Lyman L. Abbott National Biological Service Pacific Islands Science Center Hawaii National Park Field Station P. 0.Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 967 18 University of Hawai'i at Manoa National Park Service Cooperative Agreement CA8002-2-9004 May 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page . LIST OF FIGURES ............................................. 11 ABSTRACT .................................................. 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .........................................2 INTRODUCTION ..............................................2 THESTUDYAREA ............................................3 Climate ................................................ 3 Geology and Soils ......................................... 3 Vegetation ..............................................5 METHODS ...................................................5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .....................................7 Plant Species Composition ...................................7 Additions to the
    [Show full text]