DOCSLIB.ORG

Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research GUIDELINES FOR THE CARE AND USE OF MAMMALS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH Committee on Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Division on Earth and Lifes Studies THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS • 500 Fifth Street, N.W. • Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Insti­ tute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This study was supported by Contract/Grant No. N01-OD-4-2139 Task Order 90 between the National Academy of Sciences and the National Institutes of Health. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Guidelines for the care and use of mammals in neuroscience and behavioral research / Committee on Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research. p. cm. ISBN 0-309-08903-4 (pbk.) — ISBN 0-309-50587-9 (PDF) 1. Neurosciences—Research—Methodology. 2. Laboratory animals. I. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research (U.S.). Committee on Guildelines for the Use of Animals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research. II. National Academies Press (U.S.) RC337.G85 2003 616.8’0427—dc21 2003011672 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334­ 3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2003 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Wm. A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. Wm. A. Wulf are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. www.national-academies.org iv COMMITTEE ON GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN NEUROSCIENCE AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH Richard C. Van Sluyters (Chair), University of California, Berkeley, School of Optometry, Berkeley, California Michael Ballinger, Abbott Laboratories, Comparative Medicine, Abbott Park, Illinois Kathryn Bayne, Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International, Rockville, Maryland Christopher Cunningham, Oregon Health & Science University, Department of Behavioral Neuroscience, Portland, Oregon Anne-Dominique Degryse, Centre de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Laboratory Animal Resources, France Ronald Dubner, University of Maryland Dental School, Department of Oral & Craniofacial Biological Sciences, Baltimore, Maryland Hugh Evans, New York University School of Medicine, Nelson Institute of Environmental Medicine, Tuxedo, New York Martha Johnson Gdowski, University of Rochester, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Rochester, New York Robert Knight, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, California Joy Mench, University of California, Davis, Department of Animal Science, Davis, California Randy J. Nelson, Ohio State University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Columbus, Ohio Christine Parks, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Research Animal Research Center, Madison, Wisconsin Barry Stein, Wake Forest University, Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Winston-Salem, North Carolina Linda Toth, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Division of Laboratory Animal Medicine, Springfield, Illinois Stuart Zola, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia Consultants Terrie Cunliffe-Beamer, Genetics Institute, Andover, Massachusetts Peggy Danneman, The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine Timothy Mandrell, University of Tennessee, Department of Comparative Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee Randall J. Nelson, University of Tennessee, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Memphis, Tennessee Staff Jennifer Obernier, Study Director Kathleen Beil, Administrative Assistant Marsha Barrett, Project Assistant Norman Grossblatt, Senior Editor v INSTITUTE FOR LABORATORY ANIMAL RESEARCH COUNCIL Peter A. Ward (Chair), University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Pathology, Ann Arbor, Michigan Stephen W. Barthold, University of California, Davis, Center for Comparative Medicine, Davis, California Rosemary W. Elliott, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Buffalo, New York Michael F. Festing, University of Leicester, MRC Toxicology Unit, Leicester, United Kingdom Janet C. Gonder, Pinehurst, North Carolina Coenraad F.M. Hendriksen, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Central Animal Laboratories, Bilthoven, Netherlands Jay R. Kaplan, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Department of Comparative Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina Hilton J. Klein, Merck Research Laboratories, Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, West Point, Pennsylvania William Morton, University of Washington, National Primate Research Center, Seattle, Washington Randall J. Nelson, University of Tennessee, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Memphis, Tennessee Emilie F. Rissman, University of Virginia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Charlottesville, Virginia Lilly-Marlene Russow, Purdue University, Department of Philosophy, West Lafayette, Indiana William S. Stokes, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Environmental Toxicology Program, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Michael K. Stoskopf, North Carolina State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina Thomas Wolfle, Cambridge, Maryland Staff Joanne Zurlo, Director Marsha Barrett, Project Assistant Kathleen Beil, Administrative Assistant Ralph Dell, Associate Director Jennifer Obernier, Study Director Susan Vaupel, Editor of ILAR Journal vi Preface Thirteen years ago, a group of 30 some neuroscientists, laboratory-animal veterinarians, and institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) mem­ bers gathered at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda, MD, for a workshop sponsored by the National Eye Institute (NEI). The group’s purpose was to draft a set of guidelines to help in the preparation and review of protocols for the use of animals in neuroscience. The result was a 45-page report titled Preparation and Maintenance of Higher Mammals During Neuroscience Experi­ ments. Published by NIH in 1991, the booklet ultimately went through three printings, and NEI distributed over 30,000 copies to IACUCs, veterinarians, and neuroscientists throughout the world. The Red Book, as it came to be known for its bright red cover, was far more successful
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Are Male Orangutans a Threat to Infants? Evidence of Mother–Offspring Counterstrategies to Infanticide in Bornean Orangutans (Pongo Pygmaeus Wurmbii)
    Are Male Orangutans a Threat to Infants? Evidence of Mother–Offspring Counterstrategies to Infanticide in Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) Amy M. Scott, Cheryl D. Knott & Tri Wahyu Susanto International Journal of Primatology The Official Journal of the International Primatological Society ISSN 0164-0291 Int J Primatol DOI 10.1007/s10764-019-00097-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self- archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy International Journal of Primatology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-019-00097-8 Are Male Orangutans a Threat to Infants? Evidence of Mother–Offspring Counterstrategies to Infanticide in Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) Amy M. Scott, et al. [full author details at the end of the article] Received: 25 March 2019 /Accepted: 2 April 2019/ # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Sexually selected infanticide by males is widespread in primates.
    [Show full text]
  • What, If Anything, Is a Darwinian Anthropology?
    JONATHAN MARKS What, if anything, is a Darwinian anthropology? Not too many years ago, I was scanning the job advertisements in anthropology and stumbled upon one for a faculty post in a fairly distinguished department in California. The ad specified that they were looking for someone who ‘studied culture from an evolutionary perspective’. I was struck by that, because it seemed to me that the alternative would be a creationist perspective, and I had never heard of anyone in this century who did that. Obviously my initial reading was incorrect. That department specifically wanted someone with a particular methodological and ideo- logical orientation; ‘evolutionary perspective’ was there as a code for something else. It has fascinated me for a number of years that Darwin stands as a very powerful symbol in biology. On the one hand, he represents the progressive aspect of science in its perpetual struggle against the perceived oppressive forces of Christianity (Larson 1997); and on the other, he represents as well the prevailing stodgy and stultified scientific orthodoxy against which any new bold and original theory must cast itself (Gould 1980). Proponents of the neutral theory (King and Jukes 1969) or of punctuated equilibria (Eldredge 1985) represented themselves as Darwinists to the outside worlds, and as anti-Darwinists to the inside world. Thus, Darwinism can be both the new and improved ideology you should bring home today, and is also the superseded Brand X ideology. That is indeed a powerful metaphor, to represent something as well as its opposite. Curiously, nobody ever told me in my scientific training that scientific progress was somehow predicated on the development of powerful metaphors.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Behaviour Into Wildlife Conservation: the Multiple Ways That Behaviour Can Reduce Ne Laura L
    Biological Conservation 95 (2000) 303±315 www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Integrating behaviour into wildlife conservation: the multiple ways that behaviour can reduce Ne Laura L. Anthony a, Daniel T. Blumstein a,b,c,* aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia bDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia cThe Cooperative Research Centre for the Conservation and Management of Marsupials, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Received 10 June 1999; received in revised form 19 August 1999; accepted 16 October 1999 Abstract There has been a recent interest in integrating an understanding of behaviour into conservation biology. Unfortunately, there has been no paradigm for such a process. Without a clear framework for integration, conservation biologists may have diculties recognising how behavioural knowledge can help solve real-world conservation problems. Eective population size (Ne) is a key demographic parameter used to understand population viability. A variety of behaviours and behavioural traits impact Ne, yet their importance for conservation is under-appreciated. We suggest that identifying behavioural traits that aect Ne provides a paradigm for integrating behavioural biology into conservation biology. Behaviour can aect Ne through at least three dierent mechanisms: reducing N Ð the population size; reducing r Ð the population growth rate, and/or by increasing reproductive skew. We discuss how nine common behavioural traits can reduce Ne, and suggest how an understanding of these traits may inform management of both free-living and captive animals. # 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Behaviour and conservation; Eective population size; Population viability 1. Introduction knowledge of animal behaviour to conservation pro- blems, there is no clear framework to help conservation Conservation biology is a crisis discipline aimed at biologists identify the speci®c cases when they should be saving biodiversity (Soule , 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Substance Abuse
    MODULE \ Substance Abuse For the Ethiopian Health Center Team Yigzaw Kebede, Tefera Abula, Belete Ayele, Amsalu Feleke, Getu Degu, Abera Kifle, Zeleke Alebachew, Endris Mekonnen, and Belay Tessema University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education April 2005 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2005 by Yigzaw Kebede, Tefera Abula, Belete Ayele, Amsalu Feleke, Getu Degu, Abera Kifle, Zeleke Alebachew, Endris Mekonnen, and Belay Tessema All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The preparation and development of this module on Substance Abuse has the contribution of many teaching staffs of the Gondar University College.
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations Week 2.Pdf
    Foundations of Addictions Week 2 Glenn Maynard LPC Overview of Addictions • Debate in US continues on whether addiction is a disease, poor behavioral decision making or a moral failing • Prior to Prohibition, Temperance Movement placed the cause in the substance and then in the user • AA- moved the cause to the user and formed the basis of the disease model and behavioral model Addictions Counseling • Full cycle from mental health orientation to separate field and back to mental health under the name behavioral health • Long history of people in recovery working as lay counselors • Standards for addictions counselors began to evolve in the 1970’s Addictions Certification • 1972 JCAH developed accreditation standards that brought addictions into the mainstream • NIDA and NIAAA developed standards for training including 2 years recovery; one year counseling experience and written examination • Current certifications- CADC, NCADC, MAC Reuniting Addictions and Mental Health • Increased Federal and State interest in dual dx • Behavioral health includes addictions as a focus of interest • Administrative for AOD acknowledge licensed professionals as providers Brickman Schema Is the person responsible for changing the Addictive Behavior? Is the person responsible for the development of the Addictive Behavior? Yes No Yes Moral Model (War on Spiritual Model (AA and Drugs) 12-Step) Lack of willpower Loss of contact with higher power No Compensatory Model Disease Model (Heredity (Cognitive) and Physiology) Errors in judgement Activation of disease
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    Dr. John Miller (University of Sheffield) Animals, Capital, Literature and the Victorians: Writing the Fur Trade The difference between what we think of as ‘animal’ and what we think of as ‘human’ is routinely conceptualised as a fullness on the side of the human against a poverty on the side of the animal. In response, animal studies, in its emergence over the last twenty years or so, has set about dismantling this crude logic and broadening the scope of humanities research to include the nonhuman. Although at this juncture of the twenty first century, animal studies has the status of an emerging field of study, many of its central concerns are significant ingredients of nineteenth-century thought. Evolutionary theory radically destabilised entrenched ideas of human–animal difference; animal advocacy flowered, through the work of the RSPCA, the vegetarian society and the humanitarian League amongst others; the connections of discourses of species to discourses of race, class and gender became increasingly clear, and increasingly subject to debate, as the century progressed. At the same time, the use of animal bodies in a developing commodity culture accelerated to a remarkable degree, marking the Victorian period, in particular, as an era of extraordinary violence. This paper explores one of the most disturbing examples of this objectification of animal life: the global fur trade. I am interested especially in the ways in which literary fiction both bolstered and contested the conceptions of value behind the fur trade’s commodifying processes. How, I ask, do literature and capital entwine in the imagining of animals as resources to be consumed? Simone Rebora (Università di Verona) “It’s as semper as oxhousehumper!” James Joyce’s animalisation of the human Few animals can be met through the works of James Joyce.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychoactive Substance Use Disorders
    Psychoactive Substance Use Disorders 14 th March, 2011 Introduction: • In most societies, use of substances to alter mood, behaviours, perceptions etc is accepted. • In our culture, use of alcohol, caffeine and nicotine is widely accepted as normal. • Nevertheless, these substances can lead to all sorts of problems for the user. What are psychoactive substances? • Psychoactive substances (chemicals which affect the central nervous system) become a problem when their consumption becomes habitual, when a craving develops, leading to and/or exacerbating persistent social, occupational, psychological and physical problems. Complexity of substance use disorders: • Substance use disorders know no social class boundaries: people at all levels of society may fall victim. • Understanding and dealing with substance use is very difficult and complex because – Recreational drug use is widespread – Complex interactions of physical, chemical, psychological, socio-cultural variables are involved in drug use – Certain drugs (alcohol, tobacco), although culturally accepted, pose serious dangers to users Dependence and Abuse: • Dependence: cognitive, behavioural and physiological symptoms that indicate the person has impaired control over the psychoactive substance and continues to use the substance despite adverse consequences. • Symptoms: physiological tolerance to the drug and withdrawal reactions when the drug is not available. • Key component: impaired control Distinction: • Physical dependence: when certain drugs are ingested for an extended period of time, the body habituates to the particular substance (tolerance). Thus, larger amounts are needed to achieve the same effects. If the amount of the drug is reduced the body (now habituated to the higher dosage) reacts with withdrawal: cramps, panic, restlessness, sweating, vomiting. Distinction: • Psychological dependence: other types of drugs, although frequently taken, do not alter the body’s tolerance for the drug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Infanticide by Females in Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/405688; this version posted September 3, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. The evolution of infanticide by females in mammals Dieter Lukas1,2* & Elise Huchard1,3 1) Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EJ Cambridge, U. K. 2) Department of Human Behaviour, Ecology, and Culture, MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany 3) Institut des Sciences de L'Evolution de Montpellier, UMR 5554, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France *) Author for correspondence: [email protected] ORCID: Dieter Lukas: 0000-0002-7141-3545; Elise Huchard: 0000-0002-6944-449X Keywords: social competition; sexual selection; phylogenetic comparison; sociality; kinship Abstract In most mammalian species, females regularly interact with kin, and it may thus be difficult to understand the evolution of some aggressive and harmful competitive behaviour among females, such as infanticide. Here, we investigate the evolutionary determinants of infanticide by females by combining a quantitative analysis of the taxonomic distribution of infanticide with a qualitative synthesis of the circumstances of infanticidal attacks in published reports. Our results show that female infanticide is widespread across mammals and varies in relation to social organization and life-history, being more frequent where females breed in group and invest much energy into reproduction. Specifically, female infanticide occurs where the proximity of conspecific offspring directly threatens the killer’s reproductive success by limiting access to critical resources for her dependent progeny, including food, shelters, care or a social position.
    [Show full text]
  • Caged Fur—The Inside Story How Do Fur Animals Die Warning! Brochure the Decline of the Fur Fashion Industry
    FACT SHEET Caged Fur The Inside Story HSUS/FRANTZ DANTZLER ore than thirty million animals world- raised; these animals are more commonly M wide are raised in cages and killed trapped. Most caged fur-bearing animals are each year for their fur. Not only are cage- “harvested” during their first winter. Cages leave the raised animals killed inhumanely, but they animals little room for suffer numerous physical and behavioral The United States produces about 10 percent moving around: mink abnormalities induced by the stress of caging of the cage-raised fur in the world; 60 to 75 cages are about conditions. The Humane Society of the United percent of the fur in coats sold in the United two-and-a-half feet States (HSUS) is strongly opposed to raising States comes from cage-raised animals. Fur long, a foot wide, and animals in cages and killing them for fur from cage-raised animals is also used as lining a foot high; fox cages apparel and accessories. Synthetic fabrics and trim. An astounding 90 percent of all are about a foot wider that are warmer and lighter than fur have cage-raised foxes become fur trim. and six inches higher. eliminated the need for fur apparel. Intensive Confinement SHORT LIVES, PAINFUL DEATHS The terms fur farm and fur ranch are euphemisms invented by the fur industry for what really is Essential Facts the intensive confinement system of caged-fur The overwhelming major- facilities. At a typical facility, open-sided ity of cage-raised fur- sheds contain several rows of small wire-mesh bearing animals are minks.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: List of Codes Used to Create the Study Cohort and Characterize Surgery ICD-9 Codes Used to Identify Infectious Endocar
    Appendix: List of codes used to create the study cohort and characterize surgery ICD-9 codes used to identify infectious endocarditis 4210 Acute/subacute bacterial endocarditis 4211 Acute endocarditis 4219 Acute/subacute endocarditis not otherwise specified 4249 Endocarditis not otherwise specified ICD-10 codes used to identify infectious endocarditis I330 Acute and subacute infective endocarditis I339 Acute endocarditis, unspecified I38 Endocarditis, valve unspecified ICD-9 codes used to identify substance use disorder 2920 Drug withdrawal syndrome 2921 Drug paranoid state 2922 Pathologic drug intoxication 2928 Drug-induced delirium 2929 Drug mental disorder not otherwise specified 3040 Opioid dependence unspecified 3041 Barbiturate dependence unspecified 3042 Cocaine dependence unspecified 3045 Hallucinogen dependence unspecified 3049 Drug dependence not otherwise specified unspecified 3053 Hallucinogen abuse 3054 Barbiturate abuse unspecified 3055 Opioid abuse unspecified 3056 Cocaine abuse unspecified 3059 Drug abuse NEC unspecified 3044 Amphetamine dependence unspecified 3046 Drug dependence NEC unspecified 3047 Opioid/other dependence unspecified 3048 Combined drug dependence NEC unspecified 3057 Amphetamine abuse unspecified 3058 Antidepressant abuse unspecified ICD-10 codes used to identify substance use disorder F110 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids, acute intoxication F111 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids, harmful use F112 Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids, dependence
    [Show full text]
  • Rodent Societies
    Chapter 23 Nonparental Infanticide Luis A. Ebensperger and Daniel T. Blumstein Male marmot 100 moved into the Grass Group. Male 69 siops truncatus, Patterson et al. 1998), giant otters (Ptero- seemed to oppose 100’s sudden entry, but the females of the nura brasiliensis, Mourão and Carvalho 2001), hippos group appeared to accept 100. Before male 100 moved in (Hippopotamus amphibius, Lewison 1998), plains zebras there were 9 healthy marmot pups crawling around the Grass (Equus burchelli, Pluhácˇek and Bartosˇ 2000), sportive le- Group’s main burrows. Within two weeks there was one in- murs (Lepilemur edwarsi, Rasoloharijaona et al. 2000), and jured marmot pup limping around—apparently avoiding mar- suricates (Suricata suricatta, Clutton-Brock et al. 1998). mot 100. The injured pup did not survive hibernation. (Blum- Infanticide has been noted in the wild or under labora- stein 1993:14) tory conditions in two species of hystricognath rodents and 35 species of sciurognath rodents (table 23.1). Despite the A female invaded an adjacent coterie territory and entered a difficulty of observing and quantifying infanticide in these burrow containing a recently emerged, healthy juvenile. The typically semifossorial and often nocturnal species, we know marauder emerged 5 minutes later with a distinctly bloody face, a considerable amount about the proximate regulation, evo- and then showed licking the front claws [behavior]. Several lution, and function of infanticide in rodents. Understand- minutes later the disoriented juvenile emerged with fresh, se- ing the causes and consequences of infanticide in rodents vere wounds on the face and neck. The juvenile disappeared a provides a basis for developing and testing alternative hy- few days later.
    [Show full text]
  • Infanticide-Among-Animals.Pdf
    Infanticide Among Animals: A Review, Classification, and Examination of the Implications for the Reproductive Strategies of Females Sarah Blaffer Hrdy Peabody Museum, Harvard Unirqersity Infanticide among animals is a widespread phenomenon Within the same species, infanticide may occur in some with no unitary explanation. Although the detrimental areas but not others, as evidenced by the variable outcome for the infant is fairly constant, individuals expression of infanticidal behavior among Hanuman responsible for infanticide may or may not benefit, and langurs. At present, the most obvious factor influencing when they gain in fitness there may be considerable facultative expression of the infanticidal trait is popu- variation in how they gain. Sources of increased fitness lation density. from infanticide include: (1) exploitation of the infant Where it occurs, sexually selected infanticide is a as a resource, (2) elimination of a competitor for re- significant cause of mortality. As such, it has important sources, (3) increased maternal survival or lifetime re- implications for the evolution of behavior, particularly productive success for either mother or father by elim- for patterns of association between males and females, ination of an ill-timed, handicapped, or supernumerary for female reproductive physiology, and for the pat- infant, and, finally, (4) increased access for individuals terning of sexual receptivity by females. It is hypothe- of one sex for reproductive investment by the other sex sized that the threat posed by infanticide is one of sev- at the expense of same-sex competitors. Predicted attri- eral pressures selecting for a shift among higher butes of the perpetrators (such as sex and degree of primates away from strictly cyclical estrous receptivity relatedness to the infant), attributes of the victim (i.e., towards socially determined or situation-dependent re- age and vulnerability), as well as schedule of gain, vary ceptivity.
    [Show full text]