INTERNATIONAL CIVIL AVIATION ORGANIZATION ASIA AND PACIFIC OFFICE

REPORT OF

THE SIXTH MEETING OF THE SOUTH EAST ASIA SUB-REGIONAL ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP

(SEA ADS-B WG/6)

Singapore, 24 to 25 February 2011

Table of Contents

HISTORY OF THE MEETING Page

Introduction ...... i-1

Attendance ...... i-1

Opening of the Meeting ...... i-1

Language and Documentation ...... i-1

SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS

Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda ...... 1

Agenda Item 2: Review the outcome of the ADS-B SITF/9, APANPIRG/21 on ADS-B ...... 1

Agenda Item 3: Review Terms of Reference ...... 3

Agenda Item 4: Updating States’ activities and mandates issued ...... 4

Agenda Item 5: Review of sub-regional implementation ...... 6

- Near-term implementation plan, including operational plan - Identification of potential projects in Bay of Bengal - Harmonization of ADS-B regulations, rules and procedures

Agenda Item 6: Any other Business ...... 10

Agenda Item 7: Date and Venue for the next meeting ...... 10

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A: Outcome of APANPIRG related to ADS-B Appendix B: Revised Terms of Reference of SEA ADS-B Working Group Appendix C: The chart of existing surveillance capability for Myanmar’s airspace Appendix D: The updated milestone and implementation timeline for South China Sea Project Appendix E: The proposed coverage of the Phase II South China Sea ADS-B project Appendix F: Description of change on Data Sharing Agreement Appendix G: Proposed template of Data Sharing Agreement Appendix H: Proposed draft implementation plan for Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub-regional Projects Appendix I: Updated Sub-regional Surveillance Coverage Chart Appendix J: Surveillance Coverage chart on ATS Routes L642 and M771 Appendix K: Harmonization of both equipage requirements and timeline for ADS-B mandate Appendix L: List of Action Items for SEA ADS-B Working Group Appendix M: The updated Performance Framework Form (PFF) on ADS-B

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Attachment 1: List of participants Attachment 2: List of working and information papers

History of the Meeting i-1

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 The Sixth Meeting of the South East Asia Sub-Regional ADS-B Implementation Working Group (SEA ADS-B WG/6) was held in Singapore from 24 to 25 February 2011. The Meeting was hosted by the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) at Resorts World Sentosa.

2. ATTENDANCE

2.1 The meeting was attended by 54 participants from Australia, China, Hong Kong China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Viet Nam, IATA and one representative from industry. List of participants is at Attachment 1.

3. OPENING OF THE MEETING

3.1 Mr. Rosly Saad, Deputy Chief Air Traffic Control Officer of CAAS extended a warm welcome to all the participants. On behalf of CAAS, he expressed his thanks for the support and his pleasure in hosting the Sixth Meeting of the South East Asia Sub-Regional ADS-B Implementation Working Group.

3.2 Mr. Rosly Saad acted as the moderator for the meeting. Mr. Li Peng, Regional Officer CNS, Asia and Pacific Office and Mr. Ho Wee Sin of CAAS acted as Secretaries of the meeting.

4. LANGUAGE AND DOCUMENTATION

4.1 The working language was English only inclusive of all documentation and this Report. A total of Ten (10) Working papers and Six (6) Information papers were considered by the meeting. A List of Working Papers and Information Papers presented at the meeting is at Attachment 2.

Summary of Discussions 1

Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda

1.1 The agenda adopted by the meeting was as follows:

Agenda Item 1: Adoption of Agenda

Agenda Item 2: Review the outcome of the ADS-B SITF/9 and APANPIRG/21 on ADS-B

Agenda Item 3: Review Terms of Reference

Agenda Item 4: Updating States’ activities and mandates issued

Agenda Item 5: Review of sub-regional implementation plan

- Near-term implementation plan, including operational plan - Identification of potential projects in Bay of Bengal - Harmonization of ADS-B regulations, rules and procedures

Agenda Item 6: Any other Business

Agenda Item 7: Date and Venue for the next meeting

Agenda Item 2: Review the outcome of the ADS-B SIFT/9, APANPIRG/21 on ADS-B

2.1. It was noted that the APANPIRG/21 held from 6 to 10 September 2010 in Bangkok reviewed the outcome of the Regulator’s Workshop on ADS-B Avionics Requirement and Ninth meeting of the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force (16 – 19 August 2010) including work accomplished by Fifth meeting of the SEA ADS-B Working Group. The outcome of APANPIRG/21 on matters relating to ADS-B is provided in Appendix A to the Report. The Reports of Ninth Meeting of ADS-B Task Force and Fifth Meeting of the working group were also reviewed by CNS/MET SG/14 meeting held in Jakarta, Indonesia from 19 to 22 July 2010.

2.2. APANPIRG/21 appreciated the efforts and progress made by the ADS-B SITF and the SEA ADS-B WG and expressed its appreciation and gratitude to the DGCA, Indonesia for hosting the Fifth Meeting of the South East Asia Sub-Regional ADS-B Implementation Working Group, the Regulator’s Workshop on ADS-B Avionics Requirement and the Ninth Meeting of the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force.

2.3. APANPIRG/21 noted the trial and implementation status by States and some issues observed during the implementation. The following outcome of APANPIRG/21 meeting on ADS-B and their follow-up actions taken by the ICAO APAC Regional Office were noted:

− Under Conclusion 21/38, APANPIRG/21 adopted regional guidance material on processing and display of ADS-B Tracks on Air Traffic Controller Positions; Follow-up State letter Ref.: T 8/10.21:AP017/11 (CNS) was distributed on 2 February 2011.

− In its Conclusion 21/39, APANPIRG/21 agreed to a Template for promulgation of ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements. States were encouraged to use the adopted template to promulgate mandating rule for ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements as soon as possible; Follow-up State letter Ref.: T 8/10.21:AP174/10 (CNS) was distributed on 24 November 2010. 2 Summary of Discussions

− In its Conclusion 21/40, APANPIRG/21 adopted Guidelines for Airworthiness and Operational Approval for ADS-B Avionics Equipage; Follow-up State letter Ref.: T 8/10.21:AP008/11 (CNS) was distributed on 24 January 2011.

− In its Conclusion 21/42, APANPIRG/21 agreed to a recommended rule on misleading ADS-B Transmissions. States are requested to consider publishing additional provisions for misleading ADS-B transmissions; Follow-up State letter Ref.: T 8/10.21: AP175/10 (CNS) was distributed on 24 November 2010.

2.4. The meeting noted that the guidance materials, the guidelines and the revised regional Surveillance Strategy adopted by APANPIRG/21 have been posted in the ICAO APAC website: http://www.bangkok.icao.int/edocs.

Awareness by States for airworthiness and operational approval

2.5. Australia anticipates that the rate of new ADS-B approvals for foreign airlines will slow down because the responsibility for operational approval now lies with the State of registration. Australia highlighted that some States may not be aware of the ADS-B equipage requirements. IATA mentioned that the lack of awareness amongst the States may make the transition from ‘airframe by airframe’ to ‘operational approval by State of registry’ difficult. While the responsibility of operational approval lies with the State of registry, IATA is prepared to support in any way possible. The Secretariat noted that a number of States have already issued the mandate. Airlines therefore have the responsibility to request for the operational approval from the State of registry. In this regard, the secretariat was requested to help forwarding the guidelines on operational approval adopted by APANPIRG to the States outside Asia/Pacific region through ICAO regional offices while IATA was requested to remind its member airlines about their responsibility.

2.6. Australia highlighted the need to inform States outside Asia/Pacific Region that there are mandates in this region. These States will also need to be aware that they are responsible for operational approval as well. IATA will have to inform the airlines that there is a need to follow up with their own State regulators to obtain operational approval, based on the mandates in various regions. Members of the working group were encouraged to update the Task Force meeting in April 2011 on whether the State regulator has issued operational approval to the aircraft operators registered in their States for ADS-B operation.

2.7. On the issue of misleading data, Australia emphasized that there is a need to get State regulators to prevent airlines from transmitting misleading data. The meeting recalled that during ADS-B SITF/9, Australia indicated that CASA is ready to share with other States upon request a list of approved airframes by CASA for receiving ADS-B based surveillance service.

DO-260B and 3 NM Separation

2.8. Australia suggested that it is not necessary to adopt DO-260B to apply 3 NM seperation. However, States are urged to include DO-260B processing capability in the ground stations, as a large number of aircraft will be equipped with DO-260B compliant equipment in future to meet the USA and European requirements. Singapore supported Australia’s view. Singapore highlighted that so far, the ADS-B WG only considered NRA ADS-B applications; in the near future there will be a need to work out the requirements for using ADS-B in radar area (RAD) also.

2.9. Singapore also mentioned that the EASA AMC 20-24 explicitly mentions that the standard is for Non Radar Area. There is a need for the ADS-B SITF to decide whether it can be used for Radar Area. Australia voluntered to provide a paper for next ADS-B SITF Meeting explaining standards other than DO-260B that may also be used for 3 NM separation. Australia also noted that Summary of Discussions 3

SASP has agreed on the requirements for 3 NM separation standards and that SASP does not distinguish between radar and non-radar environments. It is understood that the associated documentation is to be reviewed by ANC next month.

Agenda Item 3: Review Terms of Reference

3.1 The meeting recalled that the SEA ADS-B WG/1 meeting developed Terms of Reference for the working group based on a proposal made by Australia and Singapore. The Seventh Meeting of ADS-B SITF held in early April 2008 in China noted the progress made by the SEA ADS-B Working Group. While reviewing the achievements of the First and Second meeting of the Working Group, the seventh Task Force meeting noted that Laos and Cambodia are not currently participating in the task force and working group meeting. It was suggested to invite these countries as well as Brunei Darussalam for the next working group meeting to explore possibilities of collaboration.

3.2 The SEA ADS-B WG/3 meeting reviewed the Terms of Reference of the SEA ADS- B Working Group and agreed to revise the TOR to include Cambodia and CANSO as members of the working group. The revised TOR includes “Coordination for implementation of the plan” as sub-paragraph c). In addition to the ADS-B ground stations, the requirement for provision of VHF radio communication service had also been identified and included in the TOR.

3.3 The SEA ADS-B WG/4 and WG/5 meeting reviewed the TOR and considered it broad enough as it stands. The meeting did not identify need to further amend the TOR.

3.4 Recognizing that the area of interest to the working group for sharing ADS-B surveillance data is not only limited to air space between Australia and Singapore, South East Asia but also cover most part of South China Sea area, the working group agreed to invite other States that have interest to participate in the future meetings of the working group. The meeting agreed that Brunei Darussalam be included as member of the working group. The secretariat then was requested to invite China and Hong Kong China for the future meetings of the working group.

3.5 Hong Kong China informed the meeting about their readiness to join the working group. China is also ready to join the working group. Myanmar informed the meeting that they were not ready to join the working group for the time being.

3.6 IATA mentioned that although the name of this working group is for South East Asia, the TOR should be inclusive rather than exclusive. Expertise from this working group should be shared.

3.7 Australia suggested changing the name of the working group to encourage non-SEA States to participate. Singapore suggested that States adjacent to FIRs of SEA states should be included as members. It was also reminded to note the relation between the working group and the ADS-B SITF. In view of the foregoing, the meeting proposed to rename the South East Asia Sub- regional working group into ADS-B Implementation Working Group for further consideration by the ADS-B SITF and formulated the following Decision:

Decision 6/1 – Adoption of revised Terms of Reference

That, the revised Terms of Reference (TOR) of the ADS-B Implementation Working Group provided in Appendix B to the Report be adopted. 4 Summary of Discussions

Agenda Item 4: Updating States’ Activities and Mandates Issued

4.1 Update on Australia’s ADS-B programme

4.1.1 Australia updated the meeting that the ADS-B Upper Airspace Project (UAP) has been operationally commissioned and air traffic controllers are authorised to provide 5 NM separation services using ADS-B data from all Australian operational sites. Operational coverage is currently provided across the whole continent from 29 ADS-B sites and one WAM system comprising 14 sites. The full system has now been operational for more than 1 year since the final stage was completed on 19 December 2009. Deployment of additional ground stations is being re-examined and hence delayed. The testing of the Syndey WAM was recently completed. The system comprises with 16 sites.

4.1.2 Foreign aircraft must now obtain operational approval from their state of registry before delivery of ADS-B services is approved. States need to note that post December 2013, ADS-B is mandatory at and above FL290. Hence approvals need to be obtained before that time.

4.1.3 Airservices is working on a safety case, to abandon the use of the ‘aircraft by aircraft' filtering system. Once, and if, abandoned, the ATC system will assume that all transmitting aircraft have ADS-B equipment that operates correctly in accordance with the regulations.

4.1.4 The Australian regulator, CASA, recently provided Airservices with authorisation to use ADS-B data with NUC>=4. The new values were successfully put into operation in February 2011. The number of ADS-B outages due to GPS satellite geometry issues is expected to be reduced.

4.1.5 Research continues between Australia and the FAA in the use of ADS-B data for RVSM Monitoring. Whilst the work is not yet complete, initial results are very promising.

4.1.6 IATA brought up the issue on the SA Aware forward-fit requirement for June 2012. Airlines are still experiencing problems with the forward-fit. Although vendors are optimistic about providing SA aware for new aircraft delievered after June 2012, it is still doubtful that this is possible. IATA hopes that Australia could bring the issue back to the State’s regulator. Australia clarified that there are vendors providing GPS receivers with SA aware. As result of discussion, IATA and Australia were requested to come out with a strategy to resolve this issue.

4.2 Update from Indonesia

4.2.1 DGCA Indonesia has installed 30 ADS-B Ground stations (three more from updated in ADS-B SITF/9), 21 ADS-B Groundstation installed in Makassar FIR and 9 ADS-B Ground stations installed in Jakarta FIR. The three additional sites are Semarang, Banjarmasin and Balikpapan in Makassar FIR. Currently ADS-B is only used for ATC Situational Awareness and as a complement of the radar surveillance for gap area not covered by radar, while waiting for ratification from the regulator.

4.2.2 Indonesia has implemented an ADS-B data sharing program between Indonesia and Australia. The shared sites in Indonesia are Merauke, Saumlaki, Kintamani, and Kupang, whereas the shared sites in Australia are Thursday Island, Gove, Broome, and Doongan. Letter of Operational Agreement on ADS-B data sharing between Indonesia and Singapore was signed on 22nd December, 2010. The shared sites from Indonesia to Singapore are Natuna and Matak. In order to meet the military and national security requirement, Indonesia has developed a filter for ADS-B data exchange.

Summary of Discussions 5

4.2.3 DGCA Indonesia has a plan to build JATMS (Jakarta Air Traffic Management System) in 2011. While developing the JATMS, Indonesia has built a contengency Jakarta Automation ATS system for backup. JATMS will be able to process data from Radar (SSR/MSSR/PSR), ADS-B, Surface Movement Surveillance system, SITA/ARINC gateway, ATN, AIDC, Weather Observation system and new flight plan format to be effective in 2012.

4.2.4 In response to IATA’s questions, Indonesia indicated that the rectification of regulations is going to take some time. IATA urged Indonesia to complete the rectification as soon as possible, so as to reap benefits from the infrastructure established.

4.3 Updates from Myanmar

4.3.1 Myanmar airspace has only Yangon FIR which covers the whole area of the country. It is divided into two sectors i.e. North Sector and South Sector. The existing surveillance capability for Myanmar’s airspace is provided by three Mono-pulse Secondary Surveillance Radars (MSSR). They are located at Yangon, Mandalay and Myeik airports. (See Appendix C to the Report).

4.3.2 Myanmar plans to install two ADS-B stations at remote sites such as Lashio airport for North Sector and Pathein airport for South Sector. Data collected from each remote site will be sent to Yangon ACC via VSAT link for Data integration at Eurocat-C. Myanmar also plans to install ADS-B at Kyaing Tone Airport, Sittwe Airport and Coco Island Airport. Due to the cost involved, the project will be implemented in phases.

4.3.3 IATA and Australia were pleased to note that Myanmar is making substantial improvements for communication and surveillance infrastructure serving Yangon FIR. IATA fully supports Myanmar’s efforts in further enhancements to the air navigation services.

4.4 Updates from the Philippines

4.4.1 The Philippines updated the meeting that there are plans to install ADS-B ground stations at Manila ATM Centre and Puerto Princesa Airport. The installation of the two ground stations are scheduled to be completed by first quarter of 2013.

4.5 Updates from Singapore

4.5.1 On 28 December 2010, Singapore issued an Aeronautical Information Circular (AIC) informing aircraft operators on CAAS’s plan to implement ADS-B operations after 2013 within parts of the Singapore FIR.

4.5.2 From 12th December 2013 onwards, if an aircraft operates on Airways L642, M771, N891, M753, L644 and N892 bounded within 073605N 1090045E, 040713N 1063543E, 041717N 1061247E (MABLI), 044841N 1052247E (DOLOX), 045223N 1041442E (ENREP), 045000N 1034400E thence north along the Singapore FIR Boundary to 070000N 1080000E at or above FL290:

a) the aircraft must carry serviceable ADS-B transmitting equipment that has been certified as meeting EASA AMC 20-24, or meets the equipment configuration standards in Appendix XI of Civil Aviation Order 20.18 of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia; and

b) the aircraft operator must have the relevant operational approval from the State of Registry. Aircraft that does not have the relevant ADS-B operational approval from the State of Registry will be assigned a flight level below FL290.

6 Summary of Discussions

4.5.3 IATA expressed appreciation to Singapore for issuing the notification on time. In reply to Australia’s query, Singapore expressed the intention to require airlines to switch off the ADS- B transmission if the data is misleading. Singapore further mentioned that there will be a trial period before the actual implementation of ADS-B. Based on the trial results, Singapore will decide whether or not to publish the requirement.

Agenda Item 5: Review of sub-regional implementation plan

- Near-term implementation plan, including operational plan - Identification of potential projects in Bay of Bengal - Harmonization of ADS-B regulations, rules and procedures

5.1 Implementation and Data Sharing Plans in Myanmar

5.1.1 DCA Myanmar has a plan to make an agreement with adjacent FIRs for ADS-B Data sharing.

5.1.2 China was requested to examine current air/ground communication and surveillance capability in the boarder area between China and Myanmar and seek possibility for sharing ADS-B data from Lashio in the future. Myanmar was also encouraged to explore the ADS-B data sharing with India from potential sites in the southern part such as Coo Co, Pathein and potential sites in the centre part of Myanmar with Thailand.

5.2 Implementation Plan in the South China Sea Area

5.2.1 Indonesia, Singapore and Viet Nam updated the implementation plan in the South China Sea area. It was informed that Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam have been jointly working on the installation of ADS-B ground stations and VHF radios. This involves collaboration between Indonesia and Singapore as well as collaboration between Singapore and Viet Nam.

5.2.2 Collaboration between Indonesia and Singapore

5.2.2.1 Singapore will provide to Indonesia ADS-B data from Singapore. Indonesia will provide to Singapore ADS-B data from Matak and Natuna. Indonesia will also install VHF radios at Matak and Natuna for Singapore’s use.

5.2.2.2 Indonesia and Singapore signed the ADS-B Collaboration Agreement on 22 December 2010 in Batam, Indonesia. The installation of ADS-B ground stations in Natuna, Matak and Singapore has already been completed. The installation and setting up of VHF station and links from Natuna and Matak is currently going on and it is targeted to complete by 2nd half of 2011.

5.2.3 Collaboration between Singapore and Viet Nam

5.2.3.1 Viet Nam will provide to Singapore ADS-B data from Con Son. Viet Nam will also install VHF radios at Con Son for Singapore’s use. Viet Nam is currently studying the appropriate location for the VHF stations and ADS-B ground station at Con Son. The installation and setting up of ADS-B station is targeted to complete by 2nd half of 2011. The installation and setting up of VHF station and links is targeted to complete by 2nd half of 2012.

5.2.3.2 Singapore and Viet Nam are currently working on the collaboration agreements and this is targeted to be completed by 1st half of 2011. Singapore and Viet Nam will also be working towards updating the ATS Operational Letter of Agreement between Ho Chi Minh and Singapore ACCs to facilitate the ADS-B operational trial and implementation. This is targeted to be done by the end of 1st half 2011. Summary of Discussions 7

5.2.4 The updated milestone and implementation timeline for the South China Sea project (Phase I) is shown in Appendix D to the Report.

5.2.5 For Phase II of the South China Sea ADS-B project, it was proposed at the ADS-B SITF/9 that ADS-B stations be installed at Brunei, Quezon Palawan (Philippines), in addition to Philippines’ plan to install ADS-B stations at Puerto Princesa and Manila. This meeting suggested adding one more station at Pasuquin so as to extend the ADS-B coverage up to the northern boundary of Manila FIR. This would facilitate ADS-B data sharing between Philippines and its neighboring FIR and continuous ADS-B based surveillance service to North Asia. The proposed coverage of the Phase II South China Sea ADS-B project is shown in Appendix E to the Report.

5.3 Australia-Indonesia Data Sharing Project

5.3.1 Australia and Indonesia provided an update on their data sharing project between the Brisbane and Ujung Pandang FIRs. Under Phase 1A, Australia provided data from Gove, Broome, Doogan and Thursday Island, while Indonesia provided data from Merauke, Kintamani, Kupang and Saumlaki. Full operation was achieved on 1 February 2011, with ADS-B data from foreign FIRs on screen in both Brisbane and Makassar ATC centres.

5.3.2 It was expected that the project will extend to Phase 1B and possible Phase 2. Phase 1B would comprise the sharing of data from additional sites in Australia (a site to be determined) and Indonesia (Waingapu). Phase 2 could transition to full radar-like separation with suitable ATC infrastructure.

5.4 ADS-B Data Sharing between Indonesia and Malaysia

5.4.1 Malaysia informed that the first kick-off meeting on this issue was held in 2009. Malaysia’s air traffic control system was not able to process ADS-B data yet, but is currently undergoing upgrading. By April, the system will be able to accept ADS-B data. Malaysia hopes that by then, Indonesia would be willing to share the ADS-B data from Aceh with Malaysia. Indonesia expressed that they would be happy to discuss with Malaysia.

5.5 ADS-B data sharing between Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam

5.5.1 The meeting noted that no progress had been made.

5.6 Sample agreement for data sharing

5.6.1 During ADS-B SITF/9, Indonesia and Singapore shared with the meeting their experiences on the adoption of the sample agreement. It was explained that the entire agreement has been revised quite a bit as the parties tried to make the agreement more comprehensive, precise, simple, easier to read and more acceptable to both parties. At the same time, the number of annexes was agreed to be reduced. In addition, the agreement was subject to vetting by various authorities, which resulted in further amendments. Indonesia and Singapore were then requested to provide an updated version of the data sharing agreement template based on the version signed between them.

5.6.2 The description of the changes to the original template of data sharing agreement is shown in Appendix F and the proposed template is shown in Appendix G to the Report.

5.6.3 Accordingly the meeting formulated the following draft Decision:

Draft Decision 6/2 – Adoption of Data Sharing Agreement Template

That, the revised Data Sharing Agreement Template contained in Appendix G to the Report be adopted. 8 Summary of Discussions

5.7 Review of Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub-regional Projects

5.7.1 The meeting discussed the Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub-regional Projects based on the previous discussion on the subject at the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force meetings.

5.7.2 The meeting noted that India plays a key role in the sub-region. In particular, installation of ADS-B station at Port Blair. The meeting noted that India was taking up issues concerning the implementation of ADS-B at Port Blair. The Secretariat was requested to encourage India to participate in the next ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force meeting.

5.7.3 Nevertheless, the meeting brainstormed and proposed a draft implementation plan for Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub-regional Projects as shown in Appendix H to the Report for consideration by ADS-B SITF/10.

5.8 ADS-B Seminar for Myanmar

5.8.1 CANSO was unable to attend this meeting due to other commitments and hence expressed apologies.

5.8.2 On behalf of CANSO, Singapore informed the meeting that an ADS-B seminar for DCA Myanmar was conducted by CANSO in Yangon on 22 February 2011, with support of its ANSP members, Airservices Australia and CAAS as well as IATA. The objective of the seminar was to provide DCA and the airlines of Myanmar with information on ADS-B and the latest updates on its implementation in the region. The seminar was well received by the participants as feedback survey conducted at the end of the seminar showed that all the participants found the seminar Useful/Very Useful and rated its content Good/Excellent.

5.8.3 48 participants from the ANS, ATM, CNS and Regulatory departments of the DCA Myanmar attended the seminar. Some pilots and engineers from the airlines of Myanmar also attended the Seminar. DCA Myanmar presented its ADS-B master plan at the Seminar. The master plan consisted of 5 ADS-B stations located at the following sites: Lathio Airport, Kyaing Tone Airport, Sittwe Airport, Panthein Airport and Coo Co Island Airport. According to the ADS-B Implementation Plan, the project is expected to start in 2012 and complete by 2015. The seminar identified the need to optimise the locations of future ADS-B stations in Myanmar taking into account current radar coverage and international traffic flows to, from and transiting Myanmar and the Bay of Bengal area.

5.8.4 The seminar discussed and felt that it was useful and important for Myanmar to participate in the SEA/ADS-B Working Group and the APANPIRG ADS-B SITF meetings to keep abreast of the latest in ADS-B implementation and developments in the region;

5.9 Optimum Surveillance Coverage

5.9.1 The SEA ADS-B WG/5 considered useful if coordination was carried out early on a Sub-regional basis to ensure optimum coverage. In this connection, a surveillance coverage chart was updated then to identify optimum coverage.

5.9.2 The updated sub-regional surveillance coverage chart provided in Appendix I to the Report will serve as the basis for future planning.

Summary of Discussions 9

5.10 Seamless Surveillance Coverage on L642 and M771

5.10.1 Hong Kong noted that Indonesia, Singapore and Viet Nam are collaborating in the South China Sea Project to benefit traffic along routes L642 and M771. These routes pass through four FIRs, namely Singapore, Ho Chi Minh, Sanya and Hong Kong with distance over 1300NM. The surveillance chart (without indication of existing radar) on L642 and M771 is provided Appendix J to the Report.

5.10.2 The surveillance for the Southern portion of South China Sea is covered by the collaborative project among Indonesia, Singapore and Viet Nam. The surveillance for the Northern portion will be provided by China and Hong Kong, China. Hong Kong, China plans to provide ADS- B surveillance and mandate ADS-B carriage by end 2013 for aircraft flying in the exclusive airspace between FL290 and FL410 along these two ATS routes within Hong Kong FIR.

5.10.3 As L642 and M771 will involve multiple ANSPs including Singapore, Vietnam, China and Hong Kong - China, there is an obvious need to harmonize both equipage requirements and timeline for ADS-B mandate among the concerned ANSPs. Hong Kong China recommended that the concerned CAA/ANSPs should review the adequacy of enhanced surveillance coverage to achieve seamless surveillance coverage and provide enhanced surveillance in supporting operations over the two parallel routes.

5.10.4 Therefore, minigroup consisting of Singapore, Viet Nam, China and Hong Kong China was formed to work out the harmonized requirements and timeline for implementation. The minigroup developed harmonized equipage requirements and timelines contained in Appendix K and will continue discussion in forthcoming meeting.

5.11 Provision of VHF data communications facilities for another State

5.11.1 Viet Nam suggested that APANPIRG should further support the decision for States to provide VHF data communications facilities for other States by developing a Conclusion. This would help in the domestic approval process for VHF radio frequency assignment. Australia and IATA supported Viet Nam’s suggestion. Singapore suggested that the States finding difficulty with the domestic approval to share the constraints so that the working group can propose a conclusion for consideration by APANPIRG.

5.11.2 After some discussion, the meeting requested Viet Nam and the Secretariat to develop draft proposal for discussion at the next meeting of ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force with the following initial considerations:

• Neighbouring states sharing ADS-B data, with supporting air-ground communication using VHF are requested to:

o co-ordinate VHF radio frequencies assignments with the ICAO Regional Office; and

o co-ordinate the VHF licence with the national radio regulator, as the service provider for the neighbouring State i.e: the host state ANSP holds the licence to allow it to provide the VHF communication service for the foreign state. [Note that the host state always has the capability to disable the transmitter in extraordinary circumstances].

• APANPIRG supports the provision of VHF communication services to neighbouring States to support ADS-B surveillance service to enhance flight safety and to improve operational efficiency. 10 Summary of Discussions

(Draft Conclusion 6/3 – Coordinate for VHF for sharing Voice Communication Capability That, the States providing their neighboring States with VHF voice air-ground communication infrastructure in conjunction with ADS-B data sharing coordinate with ICAO Regional Office and their national telecommunication regulator for VHF radio frequency assignment for use by the neighboring States on a sharing basis.)

Agenda Item 6: Any Other Business

6.1 The meeting discussed and agreed to the following action items by members of the Working Group as provided in the Appendix L to the Report.

Review Regional Performance Framework Form on ADS-B

6.2 The meeting reviewed and updated the Regional Performance Framework Objective (APAC Objective 10) on ADS-B adopted by APANPIRG21 meeting. The updated Performance Framework Form (PFF) on ADS-B provided in Appendix M to the Report will be presented to next ADS-B SITF Meeting for review in April 2011.

6.3 Comsoft made a presentation on the implementation related issues to the meeting.

Agenda Item 7: Date and Venue for the Next Meeting

7.1 The meeting identified the need to organize another meeting to progress implementation of the sub-regional plan. The Secretariat will coordinate with member States of the Working Group for hosting the next SEA ADS-B WG meeting in late 2011 or early 2012. The exact dates will be informed to the members States by the Secretariat at due course.

Note of appreciation

7.2 The meeting expressed its appreciation and gratitude to the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore for hosting the Working Group meeting.

______

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

EXTRACT FROM REPORT OF APANPIRG/21 (6 – 10 SEPTEMBER 2010) ON ADS-B

Surveillance

3.4.27 Under this agenda item, the meeting reviewed outcome of the Regulator’s Workshop on ADS-B Avionics Requirement and the Ninth meeting of the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force held from 16 to 19 August 2010 in Jakarta, Indonesia. The meeting also reviewed the outcome of the Fifth Meeting of the South East Asia Sub-Regional ADS-B implementation Working Group held from 21 to 22 January 2010 in Jakarta, Indonesia.

Regulator’s Workshop on ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements

3.4.28 The Regulator’s Workshop on ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements, in conjunction with the ADS-B SITF/9 meeting was organized in accordance with APANPIRG Conclusion 20/51. Twenty four presentations covering following topics on the ADS-B equipage requirements were presented and discussed by the Workshop:

• ADS-B Concept Introduction • Operational use of ADS-B in the Asia and Pacific Region • Standards and equipment • Review existing equipage mandates • Existing and Future Equipment Certification • Need to harmonize and compliance timing • Avionics products • View of air space users and ANSPs • Harmonization and guidance material

3.4.29 The outcome of deliberations at the Workshop was considered by the Task Force meeting. Based on the feedback survey conducted during the events, it was concluded that the ADS-B Workshop was very well received by the participants.

Need for Flight Inspection/Validation of ADS-B Ground Stations

3.4.30 In respect of APANPIRG decision 20/47, the meeting noted that one of the topics being studied by Aeronautical Surveillance Panel was the development of guidance on flight testing of ADS-B and Multilateration systems. While recognizing that the flight inspection for ADS-B ground stations may be required to validate the theoretical coverage against predictions, the meeting was of the view that it could be achieved by alternate means also. It was agreed that further monitoring of outcome of ASP study in this regard is required. The Task Force agreed that a formalized flight validation/testing program of ADS-B ground station should not be considered as a mandatory requirement. While the meeting noted that States may at their own discretion conduct such a program, this was beyond the minimum requirements. In view of the foregoing, it was concluded that there is no need for the Task Force to develop such guidance material.

A - 1

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

Update of ICAO Panels on ADS-B Related issues

3.4.31 The meeting noted ADS-B related developments made by the ICAO panels and their work programme including Aeronautical Surveillance Panel (ASP), Aeronautical Communication Panel (ACP), Separation and Airspace Safety Panel (SASP), Operational Data Link Panel (OPLINKP) and the newly established Airborne Surveillance Task Force (ASTAF).

Review the Terms of Reference and Subject/Tasks List

3.4.32 The meeting reviewed the TOR adopted by APANPIRG/18 and updated the list of Subject and Tasks of the Task Force. The TOR was considered appropriate and the meeting did not propose any changes to the TOR. In respect of the Tasks List, the meeting adopted following Decision:

Decision 21/37 - Subject/Tasks List of ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force

That, the Subject/Tasks List for ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force provided in Appendix N to the Report on Agenda Item 3.4 be adopted.

Processing and Display of ADS-B Tracks

3.4.33 The meeting adopted the Guidance Material on Processing and Display of ADS-B tracks at Air Traffic Controller’s Positions provided by Australia. The meeting adopted following Conclusion formulated by the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force on the subject:

Conclusion 21/38 – Guidance Material on Processing and Display of ADS-B Tracks on Air Traffic Controller Positions

That, the Processing and Display of ADS-B Tracks on Air Traffic Controller positions provided in Appendix O to the Report on Agenda Item 3.4 be adopted.

Template for promulgation of ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements

3.4.34 Following four source documents were identified by the Task Force that may be considered in the development of templates for a regulatory mandate.

- CASA Australia Civil Aviation Order. The ADS-B mandate that has actually been issued in final regulatory application is the relevant Civil Aviation Order of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority Australia. The Australian rule has been based on operations in an NRA environment but may also be satisfactory for a RAD environment. The updated Australian CAO is provided at following webpage: http://www.casa.gov.au/wcmswr/_assets/main/download/orders/cao20/2018.pdf

- EASA AMC 20-24. EASA AMC 20-24 ‘Certification Considerations for the Enhanced ATS in Non-Radar Areas using ADS-B Surveillance (ADS-B-NRA) Application via 1090 MHZ Extended Squitter’ was issued on 02/05/2008 as an Acceptable Means of Compliance for the airworthiness and operational approval of aircraft installations.

A - 2

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

- Eurocontrol ENPRM/10-003A. In April 2010, Eurocontrol issued its ENPRM/10-003 Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (SPI) Requirements under its Single European Sky Mandate on Surveillance. The ENPRM proposes a 2015 mandate for application in a RAD environment. The material is available at following webpage: http://www.eurocontrol.int/enprm/public/standard_page/enprm1003.html

− FAA Final Rule for ADS-B Out equipage mandate

3.4.35 The meeting noted that the promulgation of airspace requirements for ADS-B implementation by States needs to occur as early in the process as possible. This includes potential upgrades/retrofits and IATA had indicated that a general minimum time frame of 4-5 years should be considered.

3.4.36 The meeting noted the recommendation developed by the Task Force for consideration by those States intending to implement ADS-B based surveillance service. i.e. when promulgating requirements for mandating ADS-B airspace, States should include the following information in the documentation:

a) Specify the airspace or routes that will require ADS-B equipage;

b) Define the ADS-B performance standard(s) required recognising both EASA AMC 20-24 and CASA CAO 20.18 Appendix XI;

c) The dates for initial implementation and if any upgrades required. These dates and timeline should identify when the ground capability becomes available and when full compliance with the requirements becomes effective.

d) Provide appropriate justification for the mandate including safety analyses and business case.

3.4.37 In view of the foregoing, the meeting considered a template for use by APAC States to issue a regulatory mandate for aircraft ADS-B equipment carriage in defined airspace and adopted following Conclusion:

Conclusion 21/39 – Template for promulgation of ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements

That, based on APANPIRG Conclusion 20/54, States intending to implement ADS-B based surveillance service for a defined airspace and having not published regulations be urged to promulgate mandating rule for ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements as soon as possible using the following template:

On and after dd/mm/yyyy, if an aircraft operates on airways (insert routes)…………at or above FLXXX……….(or in defined airspace boundaries ……………. at or above FLXXX):

a) the aircraft must carry serviceable ADS-B transmitting equipment that has been certificated as meeting EASA AMC 20-24, or meets the equipment configuration standards in Appendix XI of Civil Aviation Order 20.18 of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia; and

A - 3 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

b) the aircraft operator must have the relevant operational approval from the State of Registry.

Airworthiness and Operational Approval for ADS-B Avionics Equipage

3.4.38 The meeting agreed that while operational approval was necessary, it should follow the established procedures for other operational approvals such as RVSM and PBN. This will ensure that an undue burden is not placed on either regulators or operators and will maintain a simple consistency through the regulatory approval process.

3.4.39 There is a regime in place for both PBN and RVSM where States must manage the approvals. RVSM approvals are also registered with a Regional Monitoring Agency (RMA) while a global database of PBN approvals is being established jointly by ICAO and IATA. There was a recommendation that a similar regional monitoring agency process be established for ADS-B OUT and eventually ADS-IN approval.

3.4.40 The meeting reviewed the approval process that the State of Registry is responsible for the operational approval of their aircraft in accordance with Annex 6 Chapter 4. With respect to ADS-B equipage and operation authorizations, the meeting discussed several aspects that need to be considered by the Regulators for assessing an aircraft and the operator for ADS-B operation. The meeting therefore adopted following Conclusion:

Conclusion 21/40 – Guidelines for Airworthiness and Operational Approval for ADS-B Avionics Equipage

That, States be advised to use the guidelines provided in Appendix P to the Report on Agenda Item 3.4 for Airworthiness and Operational Approval for ADS-B Out Avionics Equipage.

Updates on ADS-B Upper Airspace Project

3.4.41 Australia informed the meeting that the ADS-B Upper Airspace Project (UAP) was operationally commissioned on 19 December 2009 and air traffic controllers are now authorized to provide 5 NM separation services using ADS-B based surveillance service for air traffic at and above FL290. The coverage is currently available across the whole continent from 29 ADS-B ground station sites and one Wide Area Multilateration system comprising 14 sites. The meeting was informed that operational feedback since commissioning has been extremely positive and more than 73 per cent of all scheduled international flights in Australia are flying ADS-B approved aircraft.

3.4.42 The last ADS-B ground station of UAP Phase 1 at Broken Hill was commissioned in February 2010. Additional 18 stations are planned to be installed as part of UAP Phase 2 to provide ADS-B coverage within existing SSR coverage to provide a backup and improved tracking performance which will extend ADS-B coverage to all en-route sectors.

ADS-B development in China

3.4.43 China provided updates on its ADS-B development and deployment plan. ADS-B technology is considered as an important surveillance technology over western airspace and a significant supplementary measure for the radar surveillance in eastern part of China. ADS-B application in oceanic areas and airport surface will also be promoted and 1090ES has been chosen as the primary data link. In April 2010, CAAC issued the Chinese Technical Standards Orders of “Extended Squitter Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) and Traffic Information Service-Broadcast (TIS-B)

A - 4

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

Equipment Operating on the Radio Frequency of 1090 MHz” for manufactures applying for Chinese Technical Standard Order Authorization for 1090ES ADS-B and TIS-B equipment. In May 2010, CAAC issued the Advisory Circular of “Airworthiness and Operational Approval of Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast Application in Non-Radar Areas via 1090 MHz Extended Squitter” for the manufactures, modification units and operators who want to get airworthiness approval for ADS-B airborne equipment.

3.4.44 In March 2009, CAAC set up an ADS-B station to serve ATS Routes L642 and M771 in the South China Sea area. In addition to the Chengdu - Jiu Zhai ATS route, CAAC is now working on a project of communication and surveillance with 5 ADS-B ground stations covering Chengdu-Lhasa ATS route to be completed by the end of 2010. CAAC also has a plan to install ADS-B stations along Lhasa- Ali route and B215 route from Yinchuan to Urumqi. Further, CAAC has scheduled to build ADS-B stations nationwide according to “the twelfth five-year plan”. In the same period, the relevant automatic air traffic management systems will be upgraded to be able to receive, process and display ADS-B data.

Hong Kong China reconfirmed its plan to:

− mandate ADS-B carriage, by end 2013 for aircraft flying on ATS routes L642/M771;

− mandate ADS-B carriage, by end 2014, for aircraft flying within Hong Kong FIR; and

− mandate ADS-B carriage, after 2015 to be confirmed, for low flying aircraft including general aviation aircraft and helicopters.

ADS-B Implementation Process in Fiji

3.4.45 In June 2008, the Civil Aviation Authority of the Fiji Islands issued its Airworthiness notice detailing ADS B Equipment standards and as of the 01st May 2010, Fiji has mandated ADS B equipage for all Fiji registered aircraft operating in controlled airspace, with the exception of domestic aircraft due to be withdrawn by Jan 2011, international aircraft due to be withdrawn by Jan 2014 and any other aircraft exempted by the Authority.

3.4.46 The ATM System has been replaced with the AURORA System. At the Nadi International Airport, there are 5 ADS-B Ground Stations, 1 of which includes an interrogator. These will be setup in appropriate configuration to enable MLAT operation at Nadi International Airport. The ADS- B and MLAT ground station installations are expected to be completed before end of 2010 with Site Acceptance Testing completed by mid of first quarter 2011. The Fiji ADS-B and MLAT system is expected to be used initially as a surveillance tool from second quarter of 2011.

Indonesia

3.4.47 Indonesia provided updates on ADS-B implementation. 27 ADS-B Ground stations with dual system had been installed at Makassar, Sorong, Natuna, Kupang, Merauke, Banda Aceh, Matak, Cilacap, Soekarno Hatta Airport-Jakarta, Tarakan, Pangkalan Bun, Palu, Kintamani - Bali, Waingapu, Alor, Galela, Ambon, Saumlaki, Medan, Pakanbaru, Palembang, Pontianak, Timika, Biak, Kendari, Manado, and Surabaya amongst which 18 Stations in the Eastern part of Indonesia are connected to Makkasar Air Traffic Service (MAATS) ATM system and 9 ADS-B Ground Station in the Western part of Indonesia are linked to the Remote Control Monitor System (RCMS) in JAATS-Jakarta. The Test-Bed system at DGCA Headquarters is able to monitor and control the ADS-B Data from these 27 ADS-B Ground Stations.

A - 5 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

3.4.48 MAATS-Makassar has been upgraded from Eurocat-X version 2.4 to version 3.15 integrating ADS-B capabilities and was commissioned in December 2009. DGCA will establish Implementation Team for ADS-B implementation. Required regulations such as Operational Concept, Safety Assessment, ADS-B Procedure will be developed and introduced into CASR. For Near Term, DGCA has a plan to use ADS-B for Situational Awareness in MAATS Center. Cross FIR boundary operational data sharing has been identified as the initial application of ADS-B Services. Based on experience gained in using ADS-B for situational awareness, Indonesia will provide separation services using ADS-B.

Malaysia

3.4.49 Updates from Malaysia were as follows:

− DCA Malaysia had a discussion with DGCA Indonesia at Special Coordination Meeting which was held in June 2009 regarding ADS-B data sharing from Banda Acheh for ATC surveillance in Bay of Bengal. The discussion is still on-going;

− Malaysia had started upgrading the ATM System which will be able to integrate all the surveillance data inclusive of ADS-B. The project is scheduled to be completed in April 2011;

− Malaysian airspace is covered by radar except for a small portion in the Bay of Bengal which at the moment is covered by ADS-C. Nevertheless DCA Malaysia has submitted in 10th Malaysia Plan to install ADS-B station and also upgrade and refurbish the present radars;

− DCA Malaysia expects the timeline for ADS-B mandatory equipage in Kuala Lumpur and Kota Kinabalu FIRs to be before 2020.

3.4.50 Malaysia was encouraged to advance its plan for providing ADS-B based surveillance service for its air space in BoB area.

New Caledonia

3.4.51 France provided an update on the ADS-B implementation status in New Caledonia. Implementation of three ADS-B ground stations was completed in the first half of 2010 to provide situation awareness service for international traffic at La Tontouta airport, the domestic traffic at Magenta airport and Air Traffic Service within Nadi FIR. The ADS-B controller display positions are also available since 30 July 2010. Most of the commercial flights are now displayed on the screen for air traffic controllers whose work has become easier as now they have a better representation of the air traffic situation with more accurate information. However, some air traffic (military, general aviation etc) is not displayed and air traffic controllers still use procedure control to separate aircraft.

3.4.52 Aircraft operators flying to/from airports in New Caledonia and through sector of New Caledonia airspace are invited to equip their fleet. New Caledonia is also proposing cooperation for ADS- B data sharing with neighboring air navigation service providers such as instantaneous recordings for SAR purposes.

A - 6

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

R&D activities on ADS-B, GBAS system technologies in the Republic of Korea (ROK)

3.4.53 The meeting noted the R&D activities related to ADS-B and Ground Based Augmentation System (GBAS) technologies undertaken in the Republic of Korea.

3.4.54 Based on the CNS/ATM R&D road map for 2005~2020 in the Republic of Korea(ROK), the Korean government will undertake 19 research programs on next generation aviation safety facilities step by step. Among them GBAS and ADS-B technologies are being developed during 2010~2014 in the ROK which are in accordance with the ICAO standards, particularly focusing on the certification and operation technologies. These systems will be implemented in Korean territory after the successful development of GBAS and ADS-B test-bed system. Schedule of ADS-B R & D are as follows:

a) Phase 1 (2010-2011): Development of ADS-B system, Implementation of Test and Evaluation environments;

b) Phase 2 (2012-2013): Performance Improvement of air and ground surveillance; and;

c) Phase 3 (after 2014): Acquiring key technologies, deployment in the domestic area and regulation for installation of ADS-B airborne system;

Singapore

3.4.55 Singapore informed the meeting that the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) installed an ADS-B station and an ADS-B data processor in Singapore on 7 December 2009. The facility will:

a) complement the existing surveillance coverage by the Long Range Radar;

b) allow Singapore to perform operational trial using ADS-B data; and

c) complement the coverage of Indonesia and Vietnam through data sharing.

3.4.56 The ground station supplied by Comsoft GmbH supports ASTERIX Cat 21 versions 0.23, 0.26 and 1.3 with coverage of about 290 NM based on targets of opportunity. The ADS-B data processor can also process versions 0.23, 0.26 and 1.3 of ASTERIX Cat 21. The processing system is able to fuse ADS-B data from various sources and customized filtered dataset for each user.

3.4.57 It was also informed that the ADS-B data is currently used mainly for technical evaluation and familiarization. CAAS is considering to purchase a stand-alone controller position to conduct operational trials, before the commissioning of the new ATM automation system in early 2012. Singapore is ready to share ADS-B data with other States.

ADS-B in USA

3.4.58 .An essential component of the FAA’s Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen), is the ADS-B Program. This program will increase safety, capacity and efficiency of air travel and will provide critical flight information simultaneously to pilots and air traffic controllers. In response to a query, it was clarified that USA issued the final rule in end of May for DO260B mandate from 2020. It was further explained that the mandate does not include ADS-B IN nor does it include TIS- B and FIS-B. Further information regarding ADS-B project is available on the following FAA’s webpage: www.adsb.gov

A - 7 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

3.4.59 The current status of ADS-B deployment for FAA into National Airspace System of USA was noted. It introduced the system coverage by 794 radio sites. The meeting noted the implementation status and high level programme schedule in the presentation. About 800 ground stations will be commissioned by end of 2013. It was concluded that ADS-B technology is proven. It was informed that ITT Team has successfully designed, developed, and integrated an exceptional ADS-B ground infrastructure solution.

3.4.60 FAA, also provided information on the implementation status of essential services to the properly equipped aircraft with Traffic Information Service – Broadcast (TIS-B) and Flight Information Service – Broadcast (FIS-B). US ADS-B rule requires aircraft to be equipped by 2020 to transmit “ADS- B Out” to fly in certain airspace, equipage to receive “ADS-B In” to receive free traffic and weather service is voluntary as of now. The interoperability requirement between different ANSPs was stressed. It was also suggested that States should consider ADS-B in 3 mile terminal operation and airport surface instead of 5 mile separation for use in non-radar airspace, to save expenditure towards retrofits at a later date. It was advised that the States should consider total benefits that can be accrued from ADS-B before publishing any regulations or requirements. FAA claimed that its Final Rule and standards, notably DO 260B provides the maximum benefits possible for all these applications.

ADS-B Seminar for Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP)

3.4.61 CANSO informed the meeting that an ADS-B seminar for the CAAP was conducted by the CANSO in Manila on 11 August 2010. The Seminar discussed the benefits of the Philippines participating in the South China Sea project and recommended that apart from the ADS-B site at Puerto Princesa, the CAAP consider adding another ADS-B station, taking into account the need to provide coverage on the 2 trunk routes (N884 and M767). A possible site identified was Quezon Palawan. The seminar recommended that the CAAP consider location of additional ADS-B sites based on possible cost allocation to other user States.

3.4.62 The meeting discussed the need to optimize overall benefits of ADS-B implementation for flights in South China Sea airspace and supported the recommendation for the Philippines to install an ADS-B station on a site in the South like Quezon Palawan to cover the above two trunk routes. In this connection, the meeting also supported the recommendation that Brunei consider installing an ADS-B ground station in Brunei.

GPS Time Tagging Issue

3.4.63 The meeting noted the GPS Time Tagging issues as presented by Australia. GPS time currently differs from Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) by 15 seconds due to UTC “leap seconds”. Some GPS receivers erroneously output GPS time (as if it were UTC) until a new offset is received in a GPS navigation message. It can be 14 minutes before such a message is received. If these GPS receivers are used for ADS-B time tagging, before the offset arrives false position reports can be shown to ATC. A number of protections can limit the impact of this issue.

Regional Surveillance Strategy for APAC Region

3.4.64 The meeting reviewed regional surveillance strategy for Asia and Pacific Regions adopted by APANPIRG/19 in 2008. The meeting updated the strategy taking into account comments from fourteenth meeting of CNS/MET Sub-group of APANPIRG held in July 2010 which suggested inclusion of information regarding newly developed standard DO260B (Version 2 ES being developed by ICAO to be applicable in November 2013) and insert additional word “cooperation” at last bullet paragraph as follows: Ensure civil-military cooperation and interoperability.

A - 8

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

3.4.65 The noted revised regional surveillance strategy for Asia and Pacific Regions and adopted the following Conclusion:

Conclusion 21/41 – Revised Regional Surveillance Strategy for Asia and Pacific Regions

That, the revised Regional surveillance strategy for Asia and Pacific Regions provided in Appendix Q to the Report be adopted.

Updates on ADS-B Data Sharing in South China Sea area

3.4.66 It was informed that Indonesia, Singapore and Vietnam have been jointly working on the installation of ADS-B ground stations and VHF radios. Discussions were also held between the parties concerned on the ADS-B data and VHF radio facilities sharing.

3.4.67 ADS-B operations will be implemented in the area in 2 phases. In Phase I, ADS-B operations will apply to ATS routes L642 and M771 while other ATS routes could be covered in Phase II. ADS-B operations will be exclusive and applicable between FL310 and FL410. Aircraft intending to operate in ADS-B airspace will need to be ADS-B equipped and certified accordingly.

3.4.68 During CNS/ATM SG meeting, CANSO congratulated Indonesia, Viet Nam and Singapore for the project and for coming up with the project timeline and milestone so that all parties could work towards timely completion of the project. It was further stated that this was an excellent example of regional collaboration involving multiple ANSPs which would pave the way for the wider implementation of ADS-B in the ASIA/PAC Region.

3.4.69 IATA supported efforts made by the three States to enable ADS-B data and DCPC capability sharing. IATA totally endorsed the proposed steps and emphasized the very important role of the project with clear timelines. Importance of regulator’s ADS-B equipment seminar to be held in August was emphasized. It was suggested that States should finalize their equipment requirement to allow the air space users to have 4-5 years time for equipping their aircraft. Member Airlines are expecting to receive early benefits as best equipage should be able to receive best service.

Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub-regional Projects

3.4.70 Regarding planning and implementation of ADS-B in Bay of Bengal area, the meeting agreed to the proposal of the Task Force that a more pragmatic solution in the near term is to invite India and Myanmar to the next meeting of the SEA ADS-B Working Group, which had already been discussed and agreed by the working group. It was also suggested that both Pakistan and Nepal should also be invited.

Australia-Indonesia Data Sharing Project

3.4.71 Australia and Indonesia provided an update on their data sharing project between the Brisbane and Pandang FIRs. Airservices Australia has approved Phase 1A. Indonesia’s DGCA has also approved Phase 1A and an ADS-B Filter has been installed in MAATS, Makassar. The ADS-B Filter has been tested and integrated into the ATC System in MAATS (Eurocat X). The tests were conducted between two States and the result of the test was successful. The need to re establish satellite channel previously used between Bali and Brisbane had been identified.

A - 9 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

3.4.72 The project is expected to extend to Phase 1B and possibly Phase 2. The Phase 1A shall be operational before requesting approval to commence phase 1B which would comprise following additional sites: Broome, Doongan in Australia and Kintamani, Kupang in Indonesia. The Phase 2 would transform to full radar like separation when both parties have in place suitable infrastructure such as duplicated data communication links and DCPC capability. The meeting appreciated the progress made by the two States and supported the continued execution of the project.

Misleading ADS-B Transmissions

3.4.73 The meeting noted that a number of ADS-B avionics products transmit ADS-B data which could be considered misleading. Examples of these are:

- A product which transmits messages formats similar to, but not the same as DO260, DO260A or DO260B. When interpreted as DO260 messages, these can be misinterpreted as a good integrity messages with an incorrect position.

- A product which transmits DO260 NUC based solely on the accuracy value HFOM instead of the integrity value HPL. This can be interpreted as a DO260 message with good integrity when in fact integrity is poor.

- Other transponder and GPS products that fail to meet the published requirements of the Australian regulations

3.4.74 In environments where all airspace participants are required to have compliant equipment, the risk of using such misleading data is low. However, in an airspace which does not mandate ADS-B equippage, ADS-B transmissions may still be used, and the risk of use of such misleading data is higher in the following airspaces:

- where ATC separation services are delivered in voluntary equipage airspace;

- where ADS-B is used for ATC situational awareness only and ADS-B equipage is not mandatory; and

- where ADS-B IN may be used

3.4.75 The exception related to transmission of NIC or NUCp=0 is made because NIC or NUCp = 0 indicates that the data has no integrity and the Australian ATC system will discard such messages. Many aircraft with compliant ATC transponders, without GPS systems, transmit inertial positional data in ADS-B messages with NUC or NIC=0. It is also expected that ADS-B IN systems will discard NUC/ NIC=0 data.

3.4.76 In view of the foregoing, the meeting recommended all Asia/Pac States intending to implement ADS-B based surveillance service to consider publishing additional provisions in their mandating rule and adopted following Conclusion:

Conclusion 21/42 – Rule on Misleading ADS-B Transmissions

That, States where ADS-B may be used, even voluntarily, promulgate rule for ADS-B Avionics Equipage Requirements consider publishing additional provisions for misleading ADS-B transmission as follows:

A - 10

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix A to the Report

After if an aircraft carries ADS-B transmitting equipment which does not comply with a) EASA AMC 20-24, or b) the equipment configuration standards in Appendix XI of Civil Aviation Order 20.18 of the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia.

the aircraft must not fly unless the equipment is: (a) deactivated; or (b) set to transmit only a value of zero for the NUCp or NIC.

Note: 1. It is considered equivalent to deactivation if NUCp or NIC is set to continually transmit only a value of zero.

2. Regulators should take appropriate action to ensure that such regulations are complied with.

3. ATC systems should discard ADS-B data when NUC or NIC=0

______

A - 11 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix B to the Report

TERMS OF REFERENCE

SOUTHEAST ASIA SUB-REGIONAL ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP

Terms of Reference

APANPIRG18 Conclusion 18/38 agreed to the establishment of a sub-regional ADS-B implementation Working Group in the South-East Asia area (SEA ADS-B WG) by the end 2007 to develop the terms of cooperation and an implementation plan for near-term ADS-B applications in the sub-region.

The outcome of the ADS-B Working Group will report to APANPIRG through the ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force.

The SEA ADS-B WG shall

(a) Develop Terms of Co-operation which will include :

• establishing model documents for possible use by States when :

o Agreeing to share ADS-B data, and DCPC (such as VHF radio voice communication) capability between adjoining States for various ADS-B applications (including a sample letter of agreement); or

o Establishing ADS-B avionics fitment mandates

• identifying optimum coverage for ADS-B ground stations and associated VHF radio voice communication in the sub-regional FIR boundary areas.

(b) Develop an implementation plan for near term ADS-B application which will delivery efficient airspace and increased safety on a regional basis that include :

• schedule and priority dates to bring into effect ADS-B based services taking into account;

o Timing of any equipage mandates.

o Timing of any ATC automation upgrades to support ADS-B.

o Timing of commissioning of any ADS-B data and associated VHF radio voice communication facilities.

• consideration of major traffic flows

(c) Coordination for implementation of the plan

Composition: The Group will be composed of experts nominated by States in the Sub-region including: Australia, Brunei Darussalam, China, Hong Kong China Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, IATA and CANSO.

Reporting: The Group will present its report to ADS-B Study and Implementation Task Force.

B - 1

MYANMAR ATS ROUTES AND RADAR, ADS-B COVERAGE SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix D to the Report

ADS-B Collaboration over the South China Sea Tasks and Milestones/Implementation timeline

Item Description Status Target Completion A Installation of ADS-B ground stations i) Natuna and Matak Completed ii) Singapore Completed iii) Con Son On-Going 2H2011 B Installation of VHF station and links i) Natuna and Matak On-Going 2H2011 ii) Conson On-Going 2H2012 C Signing of ADS-B data and VHF radio facility sharing agreement i) Between Indonesia and Completed Singapore ii) Between Vietnam and 2H2011 Singapore D Signing of ATS Operational LOA between Ho Chi Minh and Singapore 1H2011 ACCs E Issue AIC on aircraft equipage mandate Completed F Technical Monitoring of ADS-B 1H2011 G Operational trial and Implementation See Annex B

D - 1

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix D to the Report Annex B-1

INTRODUCTION OF AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST (ADS-B) OUT SERVICES WITHIN PARTS OF THE SINGAPORE FIR

D - 2

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix D to the Report

ADS-B Operational Trial and Implementation In Singapore FIR

•Publish AIC on Introduction of ADS‐B Services within parts of Singapore FIR 28 Dec pursuant to APANPIRG Conclusion 19/37 and 21/39 2010

•ADS‐B Monitoring within parts of Singapore FIR •Conduct of Safety Assessment for Implementation of ADS‐B Operations in 1H2011 Singapore FIR

•PHASE I : ADS‐B Operational Trials without priority on ATS Route L642 and 2H2011 M771 within Singapore FIR

•PHASE II : ADS‐B Operational Trials with priority for suitably equipped aircraft 2H2012 on in parts of Singapore FIR at FL 290 and above

•Implementation of exclusive ADS‐B Operations in parts of Singapore FIR at FL 2H 2013 290 and above.

D - 3

290FL SEA ADS-BWG/6B WG/6 Laoag Aparri Appendix E to the Report

Tagaytay

Mt. Majic

Quezon

Zamboanga Davao PiPasuquin

Manila

Con Son PtPuerto QuezonPrincesa Palawan

Natuna Brunei

Matak Singapore SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE ON DATA SHARING AGREEMENT

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Pre-amble Pre-amble [We reworded the pre-amble stating that: (A) Having regard to the South East Asia Sub-regional Automatic Dependent a) ADS-B will enhance safety; Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) Implementation Working Group (SEA ADS-B b) Recognising the benefits, APANPIRG WG) objectives, including the optimisation of the provision and use of the ADS-B established the ADS-B task force to surveillance function through the installation of new facilities or the sharing of ADS- implement ADS-B; B data; c) Airlines expressed their desire to reap (B) With a view to the establishment of the categories of services through the airspace of operational benefits through ADS-B the regions specified in Annex A and I; d) CANSO voiced support for collaboration between ANSPs to share ADS-B data and VHF facilities; e) The parties are desirous of cooperation to enhance air traffic services; f) Parties enter into the agreement to reap full potential of ADS-B for the benefit of airlines. ] Article 1 – Definitions [Not in existing template.] [We created a new section to define the various terms used in the agreement.] Article 2 – Objective of the Agreement Article 1 – Objective of the Agreement [We include the provision of VHF voice 1 The objective of this Agreement is to improve safety and operations efficiency of civil communication services (VHF services) as part of air traffic by enhancing ADS-B coverage and ADS-B data availability in the Flight the objective.] Information Regions for which the User is responsible and the areas within 150Nm from the boundaries of these Flight Information Regions

2 For this purpose, the Provider shall provide its ADS-B data to the User with effect from [date] and in accordance with the implementation schedule in Annex G.

3 The ADS-B data to be provided are specified in Annex B, H and I.

F - 1 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Article 3 – Installation of Required Equipment Article 3 – Installation and Private Circuits 1 The Provider and the User shall install all required equipment at their respective [We amended the clause to include the provision premises. of VHF services.] 2 Both the Provider and the User shall arrange for the provision, installation and commissioning of private circuits and other associated equipment as specified in Annex B and F, required for the transmission of the ADS-B data from the Provider to the User.

3 Initial testing of the equipment and private circuits for the provision of the ADS-B data be carried out in conjunction with the Provider and the User.

4 The provision of the present article shall also apply in the event of modifications to the equipment or private circuits. Article 4 – Operations and Maintenance Article 4 – Maintenance [The maintenance of the equipment and the quality 1 Unless otherwise specified in Annex C, the routine maintenance, repair and of the data are associated. Hence, the two articles replacement service for the equipment and the private circuits installed for the provision are combined.] of ADS-B data under this Agreement shall be executed by technical staff available at the Provider’s and at the User’s premises.

2 Unless otherwise specified in Annex D, the routine maintenance, repair and replacement at the Provider’s premises referred to in paragraph 1 hereof shall be carried out free of charge by the Provider to the standards of maintenance commonly adopted by the Provider.

3 The routine maintenance, repair and replacement at the User’s premises shall be done by and at the expense of the User to the standard of maintenance commonly adopted by the User.

F - 2 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement

Article 7 – Integrity 1 The Provider shall take all reasonable steps, in accordance with the standards commonly adopted by him, to monitor and maintain the quality and continuity of the provision of ADS-B data of the facilities specified in Annex B and F.

2 Where this is reasonably practicable the Provider shall give the User such notice in respect to any planned periodic break in service as soon as such information is available and a minimum of 24 hours notice in case of any other planned break in service.

3 The Provider shall report immediately or at the earliest reasonable opportunity any failure in the provision of the ADS-B data or any abnormality of ADS-B data provided, to the User’s technical supervisor centre.

4 The User shall, in accordance with the standards commonly adopted by him, monitor the ADS-B data received from the Provider and report immediately or at the earliest reasonable opportunity any failure in the reception or any abnormality of the ADS-B data, to the Provider’s technical supervisor centre. Article 5 – Modifications Article 5 – Modifications [We include VHF and other services as part of the 1 Both the Provider and the User shall implement any modification in the equipment and possible proposed changes by the Users. The the private circuits for the provision of ADS-B data at their respective premises due to amended clauses address the costs of modification any decision of the Provider. The modification shall be carried out in accordance with to be born by each party.] Article 3.

2 The User may propose technical modifications of the specifications for the provision of ADS-B data to the Provider. The Provider shall decide on the implementation of it.

3 The modifications to be implemented shall be specified by the Provider in writing to the User not less than six months before the date the modification shall be implemented.

F - 3 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Article 6 – Cost Article 6 – Cost [We include VHF as part of the article.] 1 The cost apportionment for the use of ADS-B data as specified in Annex A, B and I shall be in accordance with Annex D.

Article 7 – Limitations on Use and Article 2 – Limitations Communication of ADS-B Data 1 The User shall use the ADS-B data provided only to ensure the safe, proper and [In the original template, either party is only continuous operation of civil Air Traffic Services or activities in support of his Air allowed to use the information for civil Air Traffic Traffic Services and for technical demonstration, evaluation and test purposes related to Services only. We added a provision stating that his operational tasks, unless otherwise specified in Annex A. any other usage is subjected to the provider’s approval.] 2 The User shall not communicate to any party not specified in this Agreement in any matter of form whatsoever any information supplied pursuant to this Agreement. The said information shall not be used for any purpose other than those specified in paragraph 1 hereof, without the prior written consent of the Provider.

Article 8 – Liability Article 8 – Liability [We amended in accordance to our mutual [The requirements on this Article should be agreed bilaterally between States] agreement.] Article 9 – Force Majeure Article 9 – Legal Aspect / Settlement of Dispute [We stated that the Provider is not in breach of this [The requirements on this Article should be agreed bilaterally between States] agreement in case of failure to perform its duty due to force majeure.] Article 10 – Settlement of Disputes Article 9 – Legal Aspect / Settlement of Dispute [We amended in accordance to our mutual [The requirements on this Article should be agreed bilaterally between States] agreement.] Article 11 – Final Provisions [Not in existing template.] [We include an article stating that nothing in the agreement shall prejudice the primary obligation of the parties whether under statute or otherwise, to ensure the safe, proper and continuous provision of civil air traffic services.] F - 4 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Article 12 – Duration Article 12 – Duration [Editoral changes to simplify the clause.] 1 The present Agreement shall enter into force on the day on which it is signed by the last of the contracting Parties, for a period of [duration to be decided by the Parties].

2 Thereafter, that period shall be automatically prolonged unless any of the contracting Parties has, by giving written notice at least [duration to be decided by the Parties] before the expiry of the contract period or the termination date of prolonged period, terminated the Agreement.

3 The Agreement can early terminate in the event the provision of ADS-B data as specified in Annex A hereof is to be permanently withdrawn from service. The Provider shall give to the User not less than [duration to be decided by Parties] notice in writing in advance thereof.

4 The Agreement can early terminate on request of the User in the event of modifications to be implemented. The User shall give to the Provider not less than [duration to be decided by Parties] notice in writing in advance thereof. Article 13 – Entire Agreement Article 11 – Annexes [The agreement and the annexes form the entire 1 Annex A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I are attachments to this Agreement. The Provider agreement between the parties.] and User, in mutual consent and formal acceptance, are allowed to amend and up-date, as circumstances deem necessary, the contents of the Annexes, in so far as the amendments are not in contradiction to or out of scope with the text in this Agreement. Annex A – Parties Annex B – Interface Specifications Annex C – Maintenance Annex D – Cost Annex E – Correspondence Annex F – Equipment Provided By One Party to the Other Annex G – Implementation Schedule Annex H – Functional Performance Requirement Annex I – Coverage or Ground Station Details

F - 5 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Article 14 – Amendment Article 11 – Annexes [This article states the mechanism in which an 1 Annex A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I are attachments to this Agreement. The Provider amendment is valid.] and User, in mutual consent and formal acceptance, are allowed to amend and up-date, as circumstances deem necessary, the contents of the Annexes, in so far as the amendments are not in contradiction to or out of scope with the text in this Agreement. Annex A – Parties Annex B – Interface Specifications Annex C – Maintenance Annex D – Cost Annex E – Correspondence Annex F – Equipment Provided By One Party to the Other Annex G – Implementation Schedule Annex H – Functional Performance Requirement Annex I – Coverage or Ground Station Details Article 15 – Rights of Third Parties [Not in existing template.] [Third parties are not allowed to enforce any terms in this agreement.] Annex A – Providers and Users of ADS-B and Annex A – Parties DCPC Facilities Annex F – Equipment Provided By One Party to the Other [Defines the providers and users] Annex B – Implementation Schedule Annex G – Implementation Schedule [Defines the implementation schedule] Annex C – Technical Scope of Work Annex B – Interface Specifications [The various technical details are combined to one Annex C – Maintenance annex] Annex H – Functional Performance Requirement Annex I – Coverage or Ground Station Details Anenx D – Cost Annex D – Cost [This annex deals with cost issues]

F - 6 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix F to the Report

Final agreement with brief description Original wordings in sample agreement Annex E – Correspondence Article 10 – Correspondence [This annex mentions about the official means of 1 Correspondence to be applied in the framework of this Agreement is specified in correspondence, which is by email, fax or letter.] Annex E. Annex E- Correspondence

F - 7 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

LETTER OF AGREEMENT ON AUTOMATIC DEPENDENT SURVEILLANCE BROADCAST (ADS-B) COLLABORATION BETWEEN [PARTY 1] AND [PARTY 2]

This Agreement is made on the [ ] day of [ ] 2011

BETWEEN

The [Party 1] of [Address], hereinafter referred to as “[.]”,

And

The [Party 2] of [Address], hereinafter referred to as “[.]”;

(each individually referred to as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”).

WHEREAS

(A) Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (“ADS-B”) is a new surveillance technology that will enhance safety and efficiency of air traffic services provision, complementing the role of radars used by air navigation service providers currently;

(B) The Asia Pacific Air Navigation Planning and Implementation Regional Group (“APANPIRG”), recognising the benefits of ADS-B, has established the ADS-B Implementation Task Force under the auspices of the International Civil Aviation Organisation to progressively implement ADS-B in the Asia-Pacific region;

(C) It is the expressed desire of airlines, through representation by the International Air Transport Association, to reap operational benefits arising from the use of ADS-B surveillance by air navigation service providers in the separation of air traffic;

(D) In line with the global thrust towards seamless air traffic services including over oceanic airspaces, the Civil Air Navigation Services Organisation has voiced support for collaboration between air navigation services providers on sharing of ADS-B surveillance data and VHF communications facilities and services, in order to reap the full capabilities of advanced technology in the most cost-effective manner;

(E) The Parties are desirous of collaboration to enhance air traffic services in the South East Asia region by mutual sharing of the ADS-B surveillance data and to facilitate direct controller-pilot communications by availing communication facilities to each other (hereinafter referred to as “ADS-B Collaboration”);

(F) The Parties have agreed to enter into this Agreement to govern their rights and obligations, to regulate their relationship with each other as Provider and User (defined below) of the ADS-B data and to reap the full potential of ADS-B for the benefit of airlines.

G - 1

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – Definitions and Interpretations

1.1 For the purpose of this Agreement, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) “ADS-B” or “ADS-B OUT” means a function on an aircraft or vehicle that periodically broadcasts its state vector (position and velocity) and other information derived from on-board systems in a format suitable for ADS-B IN capable receivers.

(b) “ADS-B IN” means a function that receives surveillance data from ADS-B OUT data sources.

(c) "ADS-B data" means information regarding aircraft position, altitude and status received from aircraft or other information generated from the ADS-B Ground Stations that receive the information from the aircraft.

(d) “ADS-B Ground Station” means a duplicated ADS-B ground station comprising receivers and communications interfaces.

(e) “ADS-B Filtering System” means the system to process the ADS-B data from the ADS-B ground stations or from other ADS-B sources before the data are sent to the Users. It includes the data fusion equipment, filtering equipment and routers.

(f) Air Traffic Services (“ATS”) includes flight information service, alerting service, air traffic advisory service, air traffic control (“ATC”) service (area control service, approach control service and aerodrome control service).

(g) All Purpose Structured Eurocontrol Radar Information Exchange (“Asterix”) means Eurocontrol standard format for data message exchange.

(h) “Direct Controller-Pilot Communication” (“DCPC”) means VHF communications, or other approved communication media in future, which is the required means for communications in order to achieve radar-like separation.

(i) “Private Circuit” means dedicated communication links between equipment sites, including those between the Provider’s and the User’s premises.

(j) “Provider” means the respective party providing the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities or other services required for ADS-B Collaboration as stated in Annex A.

(k) “Premises” of each Party means the building or land belonging to the Party, or to the Party who has possession and control over the building or land, as the case may be.

G - 2

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

(l) “User” means the respective party receiving the ADS-B data, using DCPC facilities or other services required for ADS-B Collaboration as stated in Annex A.

(m) Very High Frequency (“VHF”) means the radio frequency band from 30MHz to 300MHz.

(n) “VHF Station” means a duplicated VHF ground station comprising transmitters, receivers and communications interfaces.

1.2 Unless the context or the provisions of this Agreement otherwise require:

(a) words importing the singular number include the plural number, and vice versa;

(b) references to the neuter gender include the masculine and feminine genders, and vice versa;

(c) words denoting one gender include all other genders;

(d) references to Articles and Annexes are references to Articles and Annexes of this Agreement; and

(e) the headings to the Articles hereof shall not be deemed to be a part thereof nor shall they be taken in consideration in the interpretation or construction of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 2 – Objective of the Agreement

2.1 The objective of this Agreement is to improve safety and operational efficiency in the Parties’ respective provision of air traffic services for civil air traffic flow in the Parties’ respective flight information regions by providing and enhancing ADS-B coverage, ADS-B data availability and DCPC facilities in these regions and where applicable, the areas including and up to 150 nautical miles from the boundaries of these flight information regions.

2.2 To achieve the objective specified in Article 2.1, the Parties shall provide their respective ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration in accordance with Annex A and according to the Implementation Schedule in Annex B and the Technical Scope of Works in Annex C.

2.3 The ADS-B data is to be provided for the technical and operational purposes specified in Article 7.1, including but not limited to:

(a) ATC situational awareness; (b) ATC safety nets; (c) Support of procedural separation procedures; and (d) Updating flight plans

G - 3

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ARTICLE 3 – Provision of Equipment and Private Circuits

3.1 The Provider and the User shall be responsible for the provision, installation and commissioning of all equipment and private circuits required for the provision of ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration under this Agreement at their respective premises, unless otherwise stated in Annex C.

3.2 The technical requirement of the required equipment and private circuits are stated in Annex C.

3.3 The Provider and the User shall collaborate to test the above-mentioned equipment and private circuits to support ADS-B Collaboration before operational use.

ARTICLE 4 – Operations and Maintenance

4.1 The Provider and the User shall perform the routine maintenance, repair and replacement services of the equipment and the private circuits installed for the provision of ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration under this Agreement at their respective premises, unless otherwise stated in Annex C. The required standards of such maintenance, repair and replacement services shall be applied by the respective parties performing such services in a manner to keep the equipment and the private circuits in good working condition and fit for its purposes.

4.2 Where reasonably practicable, the Provider shall give the User a minimum of [.] days’ notice in respect of any planned periodic break and a minimum of [.] hours’ notice for any other planned non-periodic breaks in service.

4.3 The Provider shall report immediately or at the earliest opportunity any failure in the provision of the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration, or any abnormality in the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration, to the User’s technical supervisor centre, as listed in Annex C.

4.4 The User shall monitor the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration from the Provider and report immediately or at the earliest opportunity any failure in the reception or any abnormality of the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities or other services required for ADS-B Collaboration, to the Provider’s technical supervisor centre, as listed in Annex C.

4.5 The User will engage a maintenance agent for the routine maintenance, repair and replacement services of the DCPC facilities and other services required for provision of DCPC facilities.

G - 4

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ARTICLE 5 – Modifications

5.1 From time to time, the equipment, private circuits and facilities provided by the Parties may need to be modified to meet new requirements., in such situations, the Provider and the User shall be responsible, upon agreement being reached pursuant to this Article, to implement such modifications on the equipment and private circuits provided by them respectively, within the agreed timeframe. The apportionment of the modification costs is specified in Annex D.

5.2 Any proposal for such modification shall allow at least [.] or any agreed period between agreement of the modification and the date that the modification is proposed to become effective.

5.3 The Provider and the User shall collaborate to test the equipment, private circuits and facilities affected by such modification before operational use.

5.4 No modification to a Party’s equipment, private circuits or facilities shall be effected without the express agreement in writing of the other Party if the modification will require the latter to also modify any of its equipment, private circuits or facilities.

ARTICLE 6 – Cost

6.1 The cost apportionment for the use of ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required for ADS-B Collaboration including maintenance costs is specified in Annex D.

ARTICLE 7 – Limitations on Use and Communication of ADS-B Data

7.1 The User shall use the ADS-B data provided to ensure the safe, efficient and regular provision of civil air traffic services and activities in support of his civil air traffic services and for investigation or technical demonstration, evaluation, and test purposes. The User shall not, at all times, use such data for any other purpose, nor communicate to any party not specified in this Agreement in any manner or form whatsoever any data supplied pursuant to this Agreement, without the prior written consent of the Provider.

ARTICLE 8 – Liability

8.1 [To be mutually agreed between the Parties]

ARTICLE 9 – Force Majeure

9.1 A Provider shall not be in breach of this Agreement if any failure to perform its duties or to provide the ADS-B data, DCPC facilities and other services required under the ADS-B Collaboration, arises from or is caused by any event or circumstance which is beyond its control and which constitutes force majeure. Such Provider shall promptly inform the User and take all reasonable steps (under the circumstances) to minimise the disruption and to resume normal operations as quickly as possible.

G - 5

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ARTICLE 10– Settlement of Disputes

10.1 [To be mutually agreed between the Parties]

ARTICLE 11 – Final Provisions

11.1 It is understood that nothing in this Agreement shall prejudice or detract from the primary obligation of the Parties whether under domestic law or applicable international law, to ensure the safe, efficient and regular provision of civil air traffic services for the areas within their respective areas of responsibility.

ARTICLE 12 – Duration

12.1 This Agreement shall enter into force on ______for a contract period of [.] years.

12.2 This Agreement shall automatically be extended for a further contract period of [.] years upon expiry of each contract period unless either Party has givenwritten notice to the other of its intention to terminate at least [.] months before the date of expiry of each contract period.

12.3 in the event the provision of any ADS-B data as specified in Annex A hereof is to be permanently withdrawn from service, the Provider shall give the User not less than [.] year notice in writing in advance thereof.

ARTICLE 13 – Entire Agreement

13.1 This Agreement (including the Annexes hereto) constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties in relation to its subject matter and supercedes all prior or contemporaneous agreements and understandings whether oral or written with respect to that subject matter.

ARTICLE 14 – Amendment

14.1 This Agreement shall not be amended, modified or supplemented by the Parties in any manner, except by an instrument in writing signed on behalf of each of the Parties by a duly authorized officer or representative.

ARTICLE 15 – Rights of Third Parties

15.1 For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree and acknowledge that no person who is not a party to this Agreement may enforce any term of this Agreement in his own right, in particular and to the extent legally possible, the Parties specifically exclude the application of any law in [State of party1], [State of party2] or elsewhere which provides that any third party has the right to enforce this Agreement.

G - 6

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

In witness whereof, the parties having been duly authorized, have entered into this Agreement on the day and year first above written.

Signed for and on behalf of Signed for and on behalf of [Party 1] [Party 2]

[Name and title of authorised signatory] [Name and title of authorised signatory]

G - 7

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ANNEX A

PROVIDERS AND USERS OF ADS-B AND DCPC FACILITIES

1 In this Agreement, the Providers and Users are as specified below:

(a) [Facility 1]

Provider: [.] User: [.]

(b) [Facility 2]

Provider: [.] User: [.]

(c) [Facility 3]

Provider: [.] User: [.]

2 Each Provider authorizes the User to communicate the Provider’s ADS-B data to the maintenance agents appointed by the User for the purposes of maintenance and management of ADS-B equipment.

G - 8

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ANNEX B

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

[To include time line for various facilities]

G - 9

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ANNEX C

TECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORKS

1 Equipment, Facilities And Services To Be Provided By Each Party

1.1 ADS-B Stations

[Description of equipment to be provided by each party]

1.2 ADS-B Filtering System

[Description of equipment to be provided by each party]

1.3 DCPC Facilities (VHF Radio Voice Communication Station)

[Description of equipment to be provided by each party]

1.4 Private Circuits between States

[Description of equipment to be provided by each party]

2 ADS-B Data Sharing Interface Specification

2.1 Data Elements

2.1.1 ADS-B messages will comprise the data elements defined in Eurocontrol Asterix Category 21 version 0.23.

2.1.2 ADS-B Data received from each aircraft will be transmitted from each ADS-B station to the User(s) at an update rate of 1second.

2.1.3 The Asterix Category 21 version 0.23 standard allows packaging of multiple ADS-B records into a single data block, or alternatively to place a single ADS-B record per data block. Record packaging should be performed to the extent possible to minimise communication bandwidth requirements without delaying transmission of any given record.

2.1.4 The ADS-B stations and routers / processors shall not alter the contents of the data elements.

2.2 Message Description

2.2.1 The message format will be in accordance with Asterix Cat 21 version 0.23.

G - 10

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

2.3 Communication Protocol

2.3.1 The network layer is to be implemented using the Internet Protocol (IP). The network shall support Internet Group Management Protocol (IGMP) level 0, 1 and 2 as defined in RFC3300.

Note: IGMP level 1 supports transmission of Multicast datagrams, level 2 supports transmission and reception of multicast datagrams, while level 0 corresponds to IP unicast.

2.3.2 For Asterix messages, the Network Layer will use the IP for the delivery of packets. An addressing scheme, as agreed, shall be used. Multicast shall be used.

2.4 Physical Aspects

2.4.1 The communication media will be VSAT data-link communications links and submarine cables. The bandwidth of the media shall be as follows:

[Description of communication media]

3 DCPC Facilities– VHF Radio Voice Communication interface

3.1 Communication Protocol

[Description of communication protocol]

3.2 Physical Aspects

[Description of communication media]

4 Maintenance

4.1 [Description of maintenance requirement]

5 Functional Performance Requirement

5.1 General Performance Requirements

5.1.1 The ADS-B data and DCPC facilities together with the systems and equipment that provide such data and DCPC will meet and comply with the relevant international standards and best practices for applying radar-like separation using ADS-B, or radar if such standards have not been defined for ADS-B.

5.2 Specific Performance Requirements

5.2.1 Unless otherwise stated, the ADS-B stations, ADS-B routers and DCPC facilities will be duplicated with no common point of failure.

G - 11

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

5.2.2 The following standard will be met:

Aircraft Updates 1 second update rate 95%: < 2 seconds of ground-station output Network Latency (from ADS-B ground station to input of the User) 2 autonomous ground-stations including Reliability 1 antennae, each providing data with no common point of failure Each ground-station including antenna to Reliability 2 - MTBF have MTBF >10,000 hrs Reliability – Communications Completely duplicated, no common point Infrastructure of failure Reliability – Total ADS-B Total Service MTBF > 50,000 hrs Service Availability – Total Service Availability > 0.999 Total ADS-B Service Ground Station shall be checked by Site Integrity – Ground Station monitor and monitored by RCMS Integrity – Data All systems up to ATM system, errors < 1 Communications & x 10E-6 Processing

5.2.3 The following standard for DCPC facilities will be met:

System Monthly Availability Type Minimum Requirement

VHF Base Stations (Per Frequency) [State required availability]

5.3 Filtering and Message Modification

5.3.1 The ADS-B data from aircraft is collected and formed into Asterix messages in accordance with the technical specification of the ground station. The content of the Asterix messages should not be removed or modified unless technically required.

6 Location and Contact Number of the Technical Supervisor Centres of Each Party

6.1 All routine co-ordination and fault reporting of the equipment, facilities or services provided by a Party will be addressed to the following technical supervisor centre at the Party’s premises:

G - 12

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

(a) Technical Supervisor Centre at [Party 1]’s premises:

[Contact details]

(b) Technical Supervisor Centre at [Party 2]’s premises:

[Contact details]

G - 13

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ANNEX D

COST

1 General

1.1 The costs to be borne by the Parties will be on a mutually-agreed basis between the Parties.

1.2 The costs will include equipment costs, installation and testing costs, maintenance and operating costs, private circuit or equipment lease costs, cost of performance reporting, administration costs and costs of relevant taxes including but not limited to goods and services tax and costs of relevant services including but not limited to consultancy services.

2 Costs for Provision of equipment, facilities and services

2.1 Unless otherwise specified in this Annex, each Party will pay for his own costs including all the capital and recurrent costs of the equipment, private circuits, facilities and associated services provided by him as specified in Annex C.

2.2 Costs of [Facility 1]

[Description on how cost of Facility 1 will be shared]

2.3 Costs of [Facility 2]

[Description on how cost of Facility 2 will be shared]

2.4 Costs of [Facility 3]

[Description on how cost of Facility 3 will be shared]

3 Technical and operational support costs

3.1 [Description on how technical and operational support costs will be shared]

4 Termination costs

4.1 [Description on how cost due to termination will be shared]

5 Modification costs

5.1 Unless otherwise agreed between the Parties, in the event of modification pursuance to Article 5 of this Agreement, each Party will bear the modification costs of the equipment, private circuits, facilities and associated services provided by him as specified in Annex C.

G - 14

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

6 Facilities Fees

6.1 [Description on fees for facilities, if any]

G - 15

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix G to the Report

ANNEX E

CORRESPONDENCE

1. The correspondence between the Parties shall be posted and faxed or emailed to the addresses and attention it to the person indicated below:

To [Party 1]: [Contact details]

To [Party 2]: [Contact details]

2 Any Party may from time to time, by written notice to the other Party, designate a different person, facsimile or email to whom the correspondences, notices or communications must be attention to.

G - 16

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix H to the Report

H - 1 GUANGZHOU FIR DHAKA FIR TAIPEI FIR FUKOUKA FIR HANOI FIR Hong Kong HONG Chiang Rai YANGON FIR VIENTIANE KONG FIR FIR KOLKATA FIR Chiang Mai SANYA FIR Sakhon Nakhon

Ubon Ratchathani BANGKOK FIR

BkkBangkok MANILA FIR MilManila

PHNOM OAKLAND FIR PENH Trad FIR CHENNAI FIR Puerto HO CHI MINH FIR Princesa Ranong

Phuket Con Son Island

Narathiwat

SINGAPORE FIR B Aceh KUALA LUMPUR FIR Natuna KOTA COLOMBO FIR KINABALU Tarakan FIR Medan Matak Manado Galela Note: For Thailand , only a few Singapore representative stations are shown. Pontianak Palu Balikpapan Diagrams are based on last known Pekanbaru Pangkalan Sorong Biak information. Bun UJUNG PANDANG FIR For Vietnam and The Philippines, JAKARTA FIR Banjarmasin the diagrams are based on last Kendari Palembang known information. Makassar Ambon Timika Soetta For Australia, only those at the Surabaya Saumlaki fringe of South East Asia are shown. Alor Dotted line is for planned locations, Cilacap Semarang Merauke continuous line is for installed Christmas Island station. Kintamani Kupang Thursday Island Waingapu

Gove MELBOURNE FIR Darwin

Doongan SEA ADS-B WG/6 BRISBANE FIR Appendix I to the Report Broome MitMornington

Karratha

ATE_ FIR. msx 14 Nov 2007 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix J to the Report

Hong Kong Figure 1: ADS-B[O-2013] Implementation in South China Sea Legend L642 M771 (1) “ ” - Location of ADS-B ground station

(2) [O – 20xx] Planned year for ADS-B in operational use*

(3) [T – 20xx] Planned year for ADS-B in trial

Existing ADS-B Coverage** with Trial Activities

Proposed ADS-B Coverage** Con Son with Planned Date [T-2010]

Note : (*) Pre-requisites for ADS-B in operational use may include :- (a) Availability of ground station, communication backbone and ATM Natuna system that could meet ICAO [O-2014] requirements for ADS-B separation Matak services [ by ANSP ] [O-2014] (b) Operational approval on aircraft equipage [ by regulators & airlines ] (c) Approval on safety cases for ADS-B separation services [ by regulators & Singapore ANSP ] [O-2014] (**) Coverage assumes to be 250nm at FL410

J - 1

HARMONIZATION PLAN FOR M771 AND L642 (Work in progress)

S/No What to Harmonise When Issue SG - 12 Dec 2013 HK - TBC in TF10 Mandate Effective VN - TBD 1 CN - TBC in TF10 2 ATC Operating Procedures Don't Need to Harmonise 3 Mandate Publish Date Don't Need to Harmonise 4 Date of Operational Approval Don't Need to Harmonise SG - At or Above FL290 - ADS-B A/C Below FL290 - Non ADS-B A/C HK - From FL290 to FL410 inclusive - ADS-B A/C Concerns on upper Flight Level Below FL290 - Non ADS-B A/C limits VN - TBD 5 CN - TBD SG - CASA or AMC2024 HK - CASA or AMC2024 Avionics Standard (CASA/AMC2024) VN - TBD 6 CN - TBD Before 15 Nov 2012, as per AIDG. Flight Planning Same as Aus/Canada 7 On or after 15 Nov 2012, as per new flight plan format. 8 Aircraft Approval a) Procedures if A/C Not Approved Fly non-ADS-B airspace b) A/C approved but Transmitting Bad Data 9 Contingency Plan Coordination - Systemic Failure such as Ground System /GPS Failure Fall back to non-ADS-B procedure. a) between FIRs? Need to address aircraft transiting from - Avionics Failure radar airspace to non- radar airspace b) Need for commonly agreed minimal in- Letter of Operation Agreement trail spacing 10 throughout SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix L to the Report

LIST OF ACTION ITMES

No. Subject Forum Status / Target Remarks / Action Party Raised Date follow-up 1. Conclusion 1/4 – Terms of cooperation for the SEA ADS-B Closed in SEA Completed Singapore/ Working Group WG/1 ADS-B WG/2 Australia

That, a sample Agreement for ADS-B Data Sharing be developed based on the guidelines material provided by Eurocontrol contained in Appendix D to the Report. 2. Decision 2/2 – SEA Sub-regional ADS-B SEA ADS-B Closed in SEA Completed IATA implementation study project WG/2 ADS-B WG/3

That, IATA conducts SEA Sub-regional ADS-B implementation study within the project scope as specified in the Appendix B to this Report and present the initial result of study to the next meeting of the SEA ADS-B Implementation WG 3. To present the outcome of first and second SEA ADS-B Closed during Completed Singapore meeting to next ADS-B SITF. WG/2 ADS-B SIFT/7 4. IATA and CANSO to conduct a cost benefit SEA ADS-B Closed in SEA Completed IATA/CANSO study on the South Seast Asia Project. To update WG/3 ADS-B WG/4 progress on next working group. 5. Action Item 45/3 SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Reflected in the SEA ADS-B Recognizing the benefits that can be derived WG/4 SITF/8 PFF and Task WG from implementation of ADS-B, the Conference (originally List and invited the ICAO APANPIRG ADS-B Study and from completed by Implementation Task Force (ADS-B SITF) to DGCA/45) AdS-SITF/9 develop guidance material for harmonized regulations of ADS-B systems on aircraft.

L - 1 SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix L to the Report

LIST OF ACTION ITMES

No. Subject Forum Status / Target Remarks / Action Party Raised Date follow-up 6. Prepare a paper on the plans for and status of SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B On-going Malaysia ADS-B data sharing between Indonesia- WG/4 SITF/8 Malaysia

7. Prepare a paper on the experience of using the SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B To be further Singapore & ADS-B data sharing template and make any WG/4 SITF/8 updated and to Indonesia recommendations for change of the data sharing be reviewed by template. ADS-B SITF/10 8. Identify the reasons for non compliance of some SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Completed Aric Oh aircraft to AMC 20-24 when already approved WG/4 SITF/8 (Singapore for operations in Australia Airlines) 9. Prepare a paper on the “state of play” of SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Completed Australia development of ADS-B avionics regulations WG/4 SITF/8 explaining differences between regions, states 10. Prepare a paper on the status of the proposed SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Presented Australia & Indonesia-Australia project WG/4 SITF/8 updates to SEA Indonesia ADS-B WG/6 11. Organise a side meeting for regulators to discuss SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Regulator’s ADS-B TF the status of avionics standards and rulemaking WG/4 SITF/9 workshop on Chairman & at the ADS-B Task Force avionics ICAO standards was Secretariat conducted 12. Prepare a proposal on avionics equipage SEA ADS-B Closed in ADS-B Completed IATA acceptable to IATA members relevant to Asia WG/4 SITF/8 Pacific objectives

L - 2

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix L to the Report

LIST OF ACTION ITMES

No. Subject Forum Status / Target Remarks / Action Party Raised Date follow-up 13. Increase awareness by States for operational and SEA ADS-B SEA ADS-B WG/7 Letter to States Secretariat airworthiness approval WG/6 through regional offices 14. Increase awareness of Airlines’ responsibility to SEA ADS-B SEA ADS-B WG/7 Reminder to IATA get operational and airworthiness approval from WG/6 airlines and State of registry. feedback to WG 15. Clarify relation between DO260B and 3NM SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Prepare a paper Australia separation in TMA WG/6 based outcome of SASP 16. Renaming WG and relation between WG and TF SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Review and All members of WG/6 consideration at WG and TF ADS-B SITF/10 17. Review the forward fit requirement for SA SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 To develop a IATA & Aware compliance by June 2012. WG/6 strategy to Australia resolve this issue 18. To exam existing air-ground communication and SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Report status China & surveillance capability in the boarder area WG/6 and position Myanmar between China and Myanmar and identify the need and possibility for sharing ADS-B data from potential ADS-B ground station at Lashio. 19. To exam possibility of sharing ADS-B data from SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Report status Myanmar & potential ADS-B ground station from Coo Co WG/6 and possibility India and Pathein. 20. ATS operational letter of agreements between SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Report progress China, Hong neighboring FIRs among South China Sea States WG/6 SEA ADS-B WG/7 Kong China, for radar-like surveillance service Viet Nam and

L - 3

SEA ADS-B WG/6 Appendix L to the Report

LIST OF ACTION ITMES

No. Subject Forum Status / Target Remarks / Action Party Raised Date follow-up Singapore 21. Review of FPL Amendment to update AIGD and SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/11 Update the Australia and its effective date WG/6 AIGD Secretariat 22. Identify new data sharing projects in the eastern SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Prepare a Singapore and part of South China Sea. WG/6 working paper Philippines 23. Identify new data sharing projects in Bay of SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Update the Australia Bengal WG/6 proposal 24. To update ADS-B task force in the revised data SEA ADS-B ADS-B SITF/10 Prepare a Singapore sharing agreement WG/6 working paper

L - 4 SEA ADS-B WG/6-WP/6 Appendix M to the Report

ASIA/PACIFIC REGION

PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK FORM (REGIONAL)

(Amended in September 2010) REGIONAL PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVE: APAC Objective 10

IMPROVED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND SURFACE SURVEILLANCE- IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADS-B TO GROUND SURVEILLANCE

Benefits Environment • Reductions in fuel consumption and subsequent lower gas emissions

Efficiency • Increased flexibility and flow of traffic operations • Ultimately, when performing radar-like control, potential redesign of airspace taking into account the application of reduced separation minima, integrate use of aircraft navigation and surveillance capability Safety • Introduction of surveillance in a non-radar environment • Support to search and rescue operations Strategy Medium Term (2011-2015) Short term (2010) ATM OC TASKS TIME RESPONSIBILITY STATUS REMARKS COMPONENTS FRAME STARTED AOM (Airspace Implementation of ADS-B based surveillance service in the sub-regions. Organization and Management)

CM (Conflict Management)

AUO (Airspace Users Operations) • Compare current technologies with respect to concept of COMPLETED operations, relative costing, technical and Regional ATM SDM ( ATM operational performance Guidance

Service Delivery and maturity of ADS-B Study and In progress material on 2009 Management) alternative Implementation Task comparison of technology/solutions Force (ADS-B SITF) technologies (primary, secondary developed and radar including issued Mode-S, ADS-B, multilateration, ADS-C)

M - 1

• Develop an implementation plan for near-term ADS-B The FASID applications in the Asia Table CNS 4A Pacific Region including and 4B – implementation target surveillance and dates taking into ATM automation account: being updated; available equipment o ADS-B Seminar standards; readiness of conducted airspace users and ATS annually in providers; conjunction with identifying sub- o Task Force regional areas (FIRs) meetings. where there is a positive cost/benefit outcome Potential sub- expected for near-term 2009-10 ADS-B Study and In progress regions for using implementation of Implementation Task ADS-B ADS-B OUT; Force identified; developing a o Requirement for standardized and avionics systematic task-list specification for approach to ADS-B the near-term OUT implementation; application are and being developed holding educational o based on seminars and provide AMC2024 and guidance material to Australian educate States and CASA airspace users on what document. is required to implement ADS-B OUT.

• Develop Guidance Forty Fifth Material to support DGCA harmonized regulation of 2010 ADS-B Study and In progress Conference, ADS-B systems required Implementation Task through its on board the aircraft. Force Action Item 45/3 invited ICAO APANPIRG ADS-B SITF to develop the. The Guidance material has been developed by Regulators Workshop and ADS-B SITF/9 held in Aug. 10.

M - 2

• Study and identify applicable Concept of using multilateration multlateration applications in the Asia has been and Pacific Region developed; Some considering: states have plan - Concept of in place to use/operations; introduce - Required site and multilateration in network architecture; 2011 ADS-B Study and In progress particular & - Expected surveillance Implementation Task integrate it with coverage; Force A-SMGCS and Cost of system; Terminal area Recommended and en-route separation minimas; and surveillance - If multilateration can application be successfully integrated into an ADS-B OUT system for air traffic control Updated • Coordinate ADS-B information on implementation plan and ADS-B in concept of operations Europe and with other ICAO regions North American where ADS-B Regions is implementation is going 2013 ADS-B Study and On- going provided to Task on and with relevant Implementation Task Force Meeting external bodies such as Force annually; EUROCONTROL, Some Industry EUROCARE, RTCA representatives and Industry. provide input at ADS-B Seminar and meetings

M - 3

• Develop Terms of Co-operation for SEA Terms of which will include: co-operation • Establishing model developed; documents for possible sample use by States when agreement of - Agreeing to share data sharing ADS-B data and South East Asia In progress developed DCPC (such as VHF 2011 (SEA) Sub-Regional further updated radio voice ADS-B Some location communication) Implementation for ADS-B capability between Working Group ground stations adjoining States for identified. CBA various ADS-B for SEA project applications has been (including a sample completed; letter of agreement); Implementation or plan for - Establishing ADS-B Australia- avionics fitment Indonesia and mandates South China Sea • Identifying optimum Data and VHF coverage for ADS-B communication ground stations and capacity sharing associated VHF radio projects voice communication in developed . the sub-regional FIR boundary areas.

Develop an implementation plan for near- term ADS-B application in SEA which will deliver efficient airspace and increased safety on a Major traffic sub-regional basis that flow from includes: Australia to • Schedule and priority South East Asia Singapore dates to bring into effect (SEA) Sub-Regional In progress through ADS-B based services 2013 ADS-B Indonesia and taking into account: Implementation Singapore to - Timing of any Working Group Hong Hong equipage mandates; along L642 and - Timing of any ATC M771 in South automation upgrades to China Sea being support ADS-B; progressed. - Timing of Milestones and commissioning of any timelines have ADS-B data sharing and been established. associated VHF radio voice communication facilities;

M - 4

• Consideration of major traffic flows. linkage to GPIs GSI-12 Use of Technology to Enhance Safety; GPI/9 Situational Awareness; GPI/5: RNAV and RNP, GPI/7: dynamic and flexible ATS route management, GPI/17: data link applications and GPI/22: Communication Infrastructure;

References • Report of AN CONF/11; • Global ATM Operational Concept (Doc 9854); • Global Air Navigation Plan (Doc 9750); • Technical Provisions for Mode S Services and Extended Squitter (Doc 9871) • APANPIRG/16, 17, 19, 20 report on ADS-B • ADS-B related regional guidance materials adopted by APANPIRG

M - 5

SIXTH MEETING OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIA SUB-REGIONAL ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP (SEA ADS-B WG/6)

Singapore, 24-25 February 2011

ATTACHMENT 1 TO THE REPORT

LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

AUSTRALIA (1) Mr. Greg Dunstone Senior Engineering Specialist Tel: +61 (2) 6268 4286 Airservices Australia Fax: +61 (2) 6268 5709 GPO Box 367, Canberra E-mail: ACT 2601 [email protected] AUSTRALIA

CHINA (3) Mr. Kang Nan Assistant of ATC Department Tel: +86 (10) 8778 6815 Air Traffic Management Bureau, CAAC Fax: +86 (10) 8778 6810 No. 12, Zhonglu Third Ring Road East E-mail: [email protected] Chaoyang District Beijing 100022 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Mr. Li Bing Assistant of CNS Division Tel: +86 (10) 8778 6933 Air Traffic Management Bureau, CAAC Fax: +86 (10) 8778 6910 No. 12, Zhonglu Third Ring Road East E-mail: [email protected] Chaoyang District Beijing 100022 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Ms. Chen Ye Civil Servant Tel: +86 (10) 6409 1302 Division of Aircraft Certification Fax: +86 (10) 6409 2302 Department of Aircraft Airworthiness Certification E-mail: [email protected] Civil Aviation Administration Of China No. 155, Dong Si Xi Da Jie Street Beijing 100110 PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

HONG KONG, CHINA (6) Mr. Leung Ching Biu Senior Electronics Engineer Tel: +852 2591 5003 Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2845 7160 3/F, Dragonair House E-mail: [email protected] 11 Tung Fai Road Hong Kong International Airport HONG KONG, CHINA

Mr. Hui Man Ho Electronics Engineer Tel: +852 2591 5035 Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2845 7160 3/F, Dragonair House E-mail: [email protected] 11 Tung Fai Road Hong Kong International Airport HONG KONG, CHINA

1 - 2

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

Mr. Tong Ming Fai, Operations Officer Tel: +852 2910 6463 Geoffrey Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2910 0186 4/F, Air Traffic Control Complex E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong International Airport HONG KONG, CHINA

Mr. Luk Kwing-man, Evaluation Officer Tel: +852 2910 6502 Thomson Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2910 0186 4/F, Air Traffic Control Complex E-mail: [email protected] Hong Kong International Airport HONG KONG, CHINA

Mr. Pang Pak Wai, Peter Senior Airworthiness Officer Tel: +852 2769 7149 Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2362 4250 10/F, Commercial Building E-mail: [email protected] Airport Freight Forwarding Centre 2 Chun Wan Road, Lantau HONG KONG, CHINA

Capt. Cheng Lam Yuen Flight Operations Inspector Tel: +852 2769 7338 Hong Kong Civil Aviation Department Fax: +852 2362 4250 10/F, Commercial Building E-mail: [email protected] Airport Freight Forwarding Centre 2 Chun Wan Road, Lantau HONG KONG, CHINA

INDONESIA (5) Mr. Tugino DGCA Indonesia Tel: +62 21 3505006 ext. 5168 Karya Building Fax: +62 21 3507569 23th floor E-mail: [email protected] Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 8 Jakarta Pusat 10110 INDONESIA

Mr. Budi Fathoni DGCA Indonesia Tel: +62 21 3515006 ext. 5145 Karya Building Mobile: +62 818 766 722 23th floor Fax: +62 21 3507569 Jalan Medan Barat No. 8 E-mail: [email protected] Jarkarta Pusat 10110 INDONESIA

Mr. Alwyn Laksono DGCA Indonesia Tel: +62 21 31990767 (68) Gedung Thamrin City Fax: +62 21 31990769 Jl. Thamrin Boulevard E-mail: [email protected] Jakarta 10230, Indonesia INDONESIA

Mr. Teguh Harnomo Pt. Angkasa Pura II Tel: +62 21 550 6120 Gedung 600 Fax: +62 21 5506106 Bandara Soekarno-Hatta Email: [email protected] Tangerang INDONESIA

Mr. Tian Kusdinar DGCA Indonesia Tel: +62 21 3506554 Karya Building Fax: +62 21 3507569 23th floor E-mail: [email protected] Jalan Medan Barat No. 8 Jarkarta Pusat 10110 INDONESIA

1 - 3

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

MALAYSIA (2) Mr. Khairul A’ Amali Bin Principle Assistant Director Tel: +603 8871 4000 Ismail Department of Civil Aviation Fax: +603 8881 0530 Level 4, Podium Block B E-mail: [email protected] No. 27, Persiaran Perdana, Precinct 4 Federal Government Administrative Centre 62618 Putrajaya MALAYSIA

Mr. Che Ya Bin Che Man Senior Assistant Director Tel: +603 7847 3573 Kuala Lumpur Air Traffic Control Centre Fax: +603 7847 3572 Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport E-mail: [email protected] Subang 47200, Selangor Darul Ehsan MALAYSIA

MYANMAR (2) Mr. Sai Win Myint Executive Engineer (CNS) Tel: +951 533 020, 533053 Department of Civil Aviation Fax: +952 533 016 Yangon International Airport E-mail: [email protected] Mingaladon Township, Yangon 11021 MYANMAR

Mr. Myint Saung Executive Engineer (CNS) Tel: +951 533 020, 533053 Department of Civil Aviation Fax: +952 533 016 Headquarters Building E-mail: [email protected] Airport Avenue Road Yangon International Airport Mingaladon TSP, Yangon MYANMAR

PHILIPPINES (3) Mr. Andrew B. Basallote Assistant Director General II Tel: +63 (2) 879 9163 Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines Fax: +63 (2) 8799 174 Mia Road corner E-mail: [email protected] Ninoy Aquino Avenue [email protected] Pasay City Metro Manila 1301 PHILIPPINES

Ms. Anna Joy C. Papag Supervising Air Traffic Controller, Manila ACC Tel: +63 (2) 851 0639 Air Traffic Service Fax: +63 (2) 851 0639 Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines E-mail: [email protected] Old Mia Road Pasay City, 1300 PHILIPPINES

Ms. Melba S. Acurantes Supervising Air Traffic Controller Tel: +63 (2) 851 0639 Air Traffic Service Fax: +63 (2) 851 0639 Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines E-mail: [email protected] Old Mia Road Pasay City, 1300 PHILIPPINES

SINGAPORE – CAAS AAR (2) Mr. Ong Chuan Bin Head (CNS Safety Oversight) Tel: +65 6541 3032 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6542 3869 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1,Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE 1 - 4

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

Mr. Eng Chew Say Inspector (Communication, Navigation & Surveillance) Tel: +65 6541 2295 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6542 3869 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE – CAAS ATS (7) Mr. Rosly Saad Deputy Chief Air Traffic Control Officer (Operations) Tel: +65 6541 3478 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6516 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Yeo Cheng Nam Deputy Director (Aeronautical Telecommunications Tel: +65 6541 2442 Engineering) Fax: +65 6542 2447 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore E-mail: [email protected] Singapore Changi Airport PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Louie Cheng Hong Head (Surveillance) Tel: +65 6541 2406 Wing Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6542 2447 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Ho Wee Sin Senior Engineer (Surveillance) Tel: +65 6595 6061 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6542 2447 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Hermizan Jumari Senior ATC Manager (Air Traffic Management) Tel: +65 6595 6064 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6516 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Loke Chee Yong Senior ATC Manager (Air Traffic Management) Tel: +65 6595 6064 Jeffrey Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6516 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Chew Guang Wei Executive Engineer (Surveillance) Tel: +65 6595 6774 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6542 2447 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

1 - 5

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

SINGAPORE – CAAS AFO (5) Mr. Vincent Ng Senior Manager (Certification) Tel: +65 6595 6024 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6519 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Raphael Lee Manager (Continuing Airworthiness) Tel: +65 6595 6020 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6519 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Mr. Koh Wei Jen Assistant Manager Tel: +65 6541 2490 (Continuing Airworthiness) Fax: +65 6545 6519 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore E-mail: [email protected] Singapore Changi Airport PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Capt. Ong Keng Peng Flight Operations Instructor (Helicopters) Tel: +65 6541 3488 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6519 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

Capt. Mah Ching Poh Flight Operations Inspector (Airlines) Tel: +65 6541 2560 Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore Fax: +65 6545 6519 Singapore Changi Airport E-mail: [email protected] PO Box 1 Singapore 918141 SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE – JETT8 AIRLINES (2) Mr. Wee Hong Guan VP Quality Tel: +65 654 68871 Ext. 210 Jett8 Airlines PL Mobile: +65 913 0737 20 Changi North Crescent #03-00 Fax: +65 654 68221 Singapore 499613 E-mail: [email protected] SINGAPORE

Mr. Yong Kok Wee VP Engineering Tel: +65 6546 8871 Ext. 209 Jett8 Airlines PL Mobile: +65 9680 1447 20 Changi North Crescent #03-00 Fax: +65 6546 8221 Singapore 499613 E-mail: [email protected] SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE – TIGER AIRWAYS (1) Capt. Nandkumar Deputy Chief Pilot Tel: +65 938 89211 Ramaswami Tiger Airways Singapore Fax: Tiger Airways Pte. Ltd. E-mail: [email protected] Changi Airport Post Office P.O. Box 82, Singapore 918143 SINGAPORE

1 - 6

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

SINGAPORE – NCS COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING PTE LTD (2) Mr. Ng Sya Kee Deputy Director Tel: +65 6214 8068 Singapore/ NCS Pte Ltd Fax: +65 6542 3195 Singapore Air Traffic Control Centre E-mail: [email protected] 60 Biggin Hill Road Singapore 509950 SINGAPORE

Mr. Tan Yong Boon Senior Manager, Technical Solution Tel: +65 6556 7919 NCS Communications Engineering Pte Ltd Fax: +65 6481 9678 5 Ang Mo Kio Street 62 E-mail: [email protected] NCS Hub Singapore 569141 SINGAPORE

SINGAPORE – SINGAPORE TECHNOLOGIES ELECTRONICS LIMITED (2) Mr. Stephen Lim Hwee Singapore Technologies Electronic Limited Tel: Pin 24 Ang Mo Kio Street 65, Fax: Singapore 569061 E-mail: [email protected] SINGAPORE

Mr. Soh Chee Hiang Manager ATE Tel: +65 6413-1910 Singapore Technologies Electronic Limited Fax: +65 6482-0114 24 Ang Mo Kio Street 65, E-mail: [email protected] Singapore 569061 SINGAPORE

THAILAND (1) Mr. Chainan Engineering Manager Tel: +66 (2) 287 8391 Chaisompong Aeronautical Radio of Thailand Ltd. Fax: +66 (2) 285 9358 102 Ngarmduplee, Tungmahamek E-mail: [email protected] Sathorn, Bangkok 10120 THAILAND

VIETNAM (2) Mr. Hoang Huu Lich Manager, CNS (Air Navigation Dept) Tel: +84 (4) 3822 4191 Civil Aviation Administration of Vietnam Fax: +84 (4) 3822 4194 119 Nguyen Son Street E-mail: [email protected] Long Bien District Hanoi VIETNAM

Mr. Pham Hung Son Manager, CNS (Technical Department) Tel: +84 (4) 3827 1386 Vietnam Air Traffic Management Fax: +84 (4) 3827 1386 Civil Aviation Administration of Vietnam E-mail: [email protected] 200/6 Nguyen Son Street Long Bien District Hanoi VIETNAM

COMSOFT (4) Mr. Roger Becker Manager, Industrial and Aeronautical Products Tel: +49 721 9497 3040 COMSOFT Gmbh Germany Fax: +49 721 9497 1950 Wachhauster 5a E-mail: [email protected] 76227 Karlsruhe GERMANY

1 - 7

STATE/NAME DESIGNATION/ADDRESS TEL/FAX/-EMAIL

Mr. Bernard Sik COMSOFT Gmbh Germany Tel: Wachhauster 5a Fax: 76227 Karlsruhe E-mail: [email protected] GERMANY

Mr. Manfred Schmid COMSOFT Gmbh Germany Wachhauster 5a 76227 Karlsruhe GERMANY

Mr. Ian Sik COMSOFT Gmbh Germany Tel: +65-6570-1151 Wachhauster 5a Mobile: +65-9451-1241 76227 Karlsruhe Fax: +65-6570-1141 GERMANY E-mail: [email protected]

IATA (3) Mr. Geoff Hounsell Assistant Director ATM Tel: +65 6498 2253 Safety, Operations & Infrastructure (Asia/Pacific) Fax: IATA E-mail: [email protected] Tripleone Somerset 111 Somerset Road #14-05, Singapore 238164 SINGAPORE

Capt. Wee Yeng Chor Flight Operations Manager (Technical B747) Tel: +603 8777 9666 Malaysia Airlines Fax: +603 8783 8109 Flight Operations Division E-mail: [email protected] 4th Floor, Administration Building Southern Support Zone Kuala Lumpur International Airport 6400 Sepang, Selangor MALAYSIA

Capt. Aric Oh Deputy Chief Pilot (Flight Operations Technical) Tel: +65 9654 9655 Singapore Airlines Ltd. Fax: Flight Operations Technical SIA Training Centre E-mail: [email protected] 04-C, 720 Upper Changi Road East Singapore 486852 SINGAPORE

ICAO (1) Mr. Li Peng Regional Officer CNS Tel: +66 (2) 537-8189 Ext. 158 International Civil Aviation Organization Fax: +66 (2) 537-8199 252/1, Vibhavadee Road E-mail: [email protected] Ladyao, Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 THAILAND

ATTACHMENT 2 International Civil Aviation Organization

SIXTH MEETING OF THE SOUTHEAST ASIA SUB-REGIONAL ADS-B IMPLEMENTATION WORKING GROUP (SEA ADS-B WG/6)

Singapore, 24 - 25 February 2011

LIST OF WORKING AND INFORMATION PAPERS

WP/IP Agenda Subject Presented by No.

WORKING PAPERS

1 - Provisional Agenda Secretariat

2 2 Outcome of ADS-B SITF/9 and APANPIRG/21 on ADS-B Secretariat

3 3 Review of Terms of Reference of the Sea ADS-B Working Secretariat Group

4 5 Review of SEA and Bay of Bengal/South Asia Sub- Secretariat regional ADS-B Implementation Projects

5 5 Review on ADS-B Implementation in the South China Sea Hong Kong China

6 6 Review Regional Performance Objective on ADS-B Secretariat

7 5 CANSO ADS-B Seminar for Myanmar CANSO

8 5 Australian ADS-B Update Australia

9 5 Updating of Sample Agreement Indonesia and Singapore

10 5 Update on the ADS-B Collaboration Project in the South Indonesia, China Sea Area Singapore and Viet Nam

INFORMATION PAPERS

1 - Meeting Bulletin Secretariat

2 5 ADS-B Implementation Plan in Myanmar Myanmar

3 5 Review of SEA and SA Sub-Regional ADS-B Secretariat Implementation Projects (ADS-B SITF/8)

4 4 ADS-B Mandate Issued by Singapore Singapore

2 - 1

WP/IP Agenda Subject Presented by No. 5 5 ADS-B Data Sharing : Indonesia - Australia Australia and Indonesia

6 4 Update ADS-B Implementation in Indonesia Indonesia

______Sixth Meeting of the Southeast Asia Sub‐Regional ADS‐B Implementation Working Group (SEA ADS‐B WG/6) Singapore, 24 ‐ 25 February 2011