Actuele Houtmonstervoorraad Juni 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Actuele Houtmonstervoorraad Juni 2021 ltr Nr. Ltr Botanische namen Handels- en boomnamen Familie Prijs (EUR) Info A 1 Taxus baccata L. Taxus Taxaceae 2,25 5 A 1 B Taxus baccata L. Taxus Taxaceae 2,25 0 A 2 Abies alba Mill. Dennen, Duits Pinaceae 2,25 32 A 3 Tetragastris sp. / Protium sp. oa. T.hostmannii Salie Burseraceae 2,25 0 A 4 A Pseudotsuga taxifolia (Poir.) Britton Douglas, inlands Pinaceae 2,25 8 A 5 Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. Vuren, inlands Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 6 Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. Vuren, Duits Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 7 Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. Vuren, Fins Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 8 Picea abies (L.) H.Karst. Vuren, Noors Pinaceae 2,25 21 A 9 Picea spec.div. Vuren, Zweeds Pinaceae 2,25 1 A 10 Larix sp. Larix Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 10 A Larix sp. Larix Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 11 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, inlands Pinaceae 2,25 1 A 12 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, Duits Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 13 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, Fins Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 14 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, Noors Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 15 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, Zweeds Pinaceae 2,25 1 A 16 Pinus pinaster Aiton Grenen, Frans Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 17 Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold Grenen / Oostenrijkse den Pinaceae 2,25 0 A 18 Pinus nigra subsp. Laricio Maire Grenen / Corsicaanse den Pinaceae 2,25 18 A 19 A Pinus strobus L. Weymouth den Pinaceae 2,25 8 A 20 Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. / A.incana (L.) Moench Elzen Betulaceae 2,25 1 A 21 Betula pendula Roth / Betula pubescens Ehrh. Berken Betulaceae 2,25 41 A 22 Carpinus betulus L. Haagbeuken Corylaceae 2,25 0 A 23 Corylus avellana L. Hazelaar Corylaceae 2,25 18 A 24 Quercus spec.div. (Q. rubra L. ?) Rode eik / inl. Am. eiken Fagaceae 2,25 18 A 25 Quercus robur L. / Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Eiken, inlands Fagaceae 2,25 0 A 26 Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Eiken, Duits Fagaceae 2,25 26 A 27 Quercus robur L. / Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Eiken, Frans Fagaceae 2,25 8 A 31 Quercus robur L. Eiken, Slavonisch Fagaceae 2,25 14 A 32 Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Eiken, Spessart Fagaceae 2,25 13 A 33 Castanea sativa Mill. Tamme kastanje Fagaceae 2,25 28 A 33 A Castanea sativa Mill. Tamme kastanje Fagaceae 2,25 0 A 34 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, inlands Fagaceae 2,25 0 A 35 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, Deens Fagaceae 2,25 0 A 36 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, Roemeens Fagaceae 2,25 0 A 37 A Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, Slav. (gestoomd) Fagaceae 2,25 43 A 38 Juglans regia L. Noten, inlands Juglandaceae 2,25 22 A 38 A Juglans regia L. Noten, inlands Juglandaceae 2,25 2 A 39 Juglans regia L. Noten, duits Juglandaceae 2,25 0 A 40 Juglans regia L. Noten, Frans Juglandaceae 2,25 1 A 41 Juglans regia L. Noten, Italiaans Juglandaceae 2,25 1 A 42 Juglans regia L. Noten, Kaukasisch Juglandaceae 2,25 0 A 43 Salix spec.div. vnml. S.alba L. Wilgen Salicaceae 2,25 0 A 44 Populus alba L. Populieren Salicaceae 2,25 74 A 44 A Populus alba L. Populieren Salicaceae 2,25 13 A 45 Populus alba L. Populieren Salicaceae 2,25 0 A 46 Ulmus spec.div. Iepen, inlands Ulmaceae 2,25 25 A 47 Platanus x hispanica Mill.ex Münch Plataan Platanaceae 2,25 27 A 48 Prunus domestica L. Pruimen Rosaceae 2,25 5 A 48 B Prunus domestica L. Pruimen Rosaceae 2,25 0 A 49 Prunus avium (L.) L. Kersen, Europees Rosaceae 2,25 6 A 49 A Prunus avium (L.) L. Kersen, Europees Rosaceae 2,25 0 A 50 Pyrus communis L. Peren Rosaceae 2,25 17 A 50 B Pyrus communis L. Peren Rosaceae 2,25 7 A 51 Malus pumila Mill. Appel Rosaceae 2,25 0 A 52 Robinia pseudoacacia L. Robinia Leguminosae (Ppl) 2,25 11 A 53 Tilia spec.div. Linden Malvaceae 2,25 21 A 53 A Tilia spec.div. Linden Malvaceae 2,25 14 A 54 Acer platanoides L. / Acer pseudoplatanus L. Esdoorn Sapindaceae 2,25 1 A 55 Aesculus hippocastanum L. Paardenkastanje Sapindaceae 2,25 0 A 56 Fraxinus excelsior L. Essen Oleaceae 2,25 34 A 56 A Fraxinus excelsior L. Essen Oleaceae 2,25 0 1 Aspidosperma polyneuron Muell.Arg. Peroba rosa Apocynaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 2 A Loxopterygium sagotii Hook.f. Slangenhout Anacardiaceae 2,25 0 3 Tetragastris sp. / Protium sp. mog. T.hostmannii Kuntze Salie Burseraceae 2,25 24 4 A Carapa guianensis Aubl. / Carapa procera DC. Krappa Meliaceae 2,25 0 5 A Tarrietia sp. mog. utilis (Sparague) Sprageu Niangon, ingegr.bast Sterculiaceae 2,5 jvg'11 16 5 A Tarrietia utilis (Sparague) Sprageu Niangon Sterculiaceae 2,25 33 6 A Paratecoma peroba (Record) Kuhlm. Peroba de campos Bignoniaceae 2,25 10 7 Symphonia globulifera L.f. Matakki Clusiaceae 2,25 19 8 Robinia pseudoacacia L. Robinia Leguminosae (Ppl) 2,25 nu A52 0 9 Populus spec. div. Populieren, Peppel Betulaceae 2,25 nu A45 0 10 Turraeanthus africanus (Welw. Ex C.DC.) Pellegr. Avodiré Meliaceae 2,25 7 11 Tilia cordata, T.platyphyllos Scop Linden, inlands Malvaceae 2,25 nu A53 0 12 Betula lenta L. Berken Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 13 Pyrus communis Peren, inlands Rosaceae 2,25 nu A50 0 14 Malus sylvestris Appel, inlands Rosaceae 2,25 nu A51 0 15 Dipterocarpus spec.div. Yang Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 1 15 A Dipterocarpus spec.div. Yang Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 27 16 Sequoia sempervirens (D.Don) Endl. Redwood, Californian Taxodiaceae 2,25 16 17 Betula pubescens Ehrh. Berken Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 18 Betula pubescens Ehrh Vlam-berken Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 19 Podocarpus spec.div. oa. P.nubigenus Lindl. Manio Podocarpaceae 2,25 10 20 Aesculus hippocastanum Paardenkastanje Sapindaceae 2,25 nu A55 0 21 Betula pubescens Ehrh. Berken moiré Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 21 A Betula pubescens Ehrh. Berken wortel Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 22 Ulmus spec.div. Iepen, inlands Ulmaceae 2,25 nu A46 0 23 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, inlands Fagaceae 2,25 nu A34 0 24 AB Betula pubescens Ehrh Berken (gekleurd) Betulaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 25 Aspidosperma eburneum Allemão ex Saldanha Pequia marfim Apocynaceae 2,25 0 26 Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Eiken, Frans Fagaceae 2,25 nu A27 0 27 Quercus robur L. Eiken, Slavonisch Fagaceae 2,25 nu A31 0 28 Mimusops sp. (verm. M.africana) Makoré Sapotaceae 2,25 2 29 Tabebuia spec.div. vnml. Handroanthus serratifolia (Vahl) S.O. Grose Surinaams groenhart Bignoniaceae 2,25 14 30 Lophira procera Banks ex C.F. Gaertn. Azobé Ochnaceae 2,25 36 31 Shorea laevifolia (Parijs) Endert Bangkirai Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 34 31 A Shorea laevifolia (Parijs) Endert Bangkirai Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 0 32 Ocotea rubra Mez Wane Lauraceae 2,25 38 33 A Eperua spec.div. mog. E.falcata Aubl. Walaba Leguminosae (Detarioideae) 2,25 12 34 Diplotropis guianensis Benth. / Bowdichia? Zwarte kabbes Leguminosae (Ppl) 2,25 37 35 Zanthoxylum spec.div. Zwarte pritijari Rutaceae 2,25 0 36 Micropholis guyanensis (A.DC.) Pierre (verm.) Riemhout Sapotaceae 2,25 0 37 Chytranthus setosus (verm.) Nye Sapindaceae 2,25 nu 079 0 38 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, Slav. (gestoomd) Fagaceae 2,25 nu A37 0 39 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken (gestoomd) Fagaceae 2,25 0 39 A Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken (licht gestoomd) Fagaceae 2,25 15 40 Fagus sylvatica L. Beuken, inlands Fagaceae 2,25 46 41 Platanus X acerifolia Plataan Platanaceae 2,25 nu A47 0 42 Quercus spec. verm. Q. robur L. Mooreiken Fagaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 43 Entandrofragma/Khaya sp. Mahonie, drapé Meliaceae 2,25 (fineer) 0 44 A Fitzroya cupressoides (Molina) I.M.Johnston Alerce Cupressaceae 2,25 19 45 Hymenaea courbaril L. Locus Leguminosae (Detarioideae) 2,25 6 46 A Vouacapoua americana Aubl. Bruinhart Leguminosae (Csl) 2,25 4 47 Nothofagus obliqua (Mirb.) Oerst. Roble pellin Nothofagaceae 2,25 1 48 Platonia insignis Mart. Pakoeli / Geelhart Clusiaceae 2,25 1 48 A Platonia insignis Mart. Pakoeli / Geelhart Clusiaceae 2,25 11 49 A Dryobalanops spec. oa D.sumatrensis (J.F.Gmel.) Kosterm. Kapoer Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 35 50 Shorea spec.div. Meranti Dipterocarpaceae 2,25 0 51 Virola surinamensis (Rol. Ex Rottb.) Warb. Baboen Myristicaceae 2,25 0 52 Mora excelsa Benth. Mora Leguminosae (Csl) 2,25 7 53 Prunus sp. Verm. P.avium (L.) L. Kersen, Europees Rosaceae 2,25 nu A49 0 54 Ocotea prosa (Nees & Mart.) Barroso Laurel Monimiaceae 2,25 1 55 Phoebe porosa (Nees & Mart.) Mez Imbuia Lauraceae 2,25 19 56 A Nothofagus procera (Poepp. & Endl.) Oerst. Rauli Nothofagaceae 2,25 20 57 Weinmannia spec.div. Tenio Cunoniaceae 2,25 0 58 Cryptocarya alba (Molina) Looser Canella lageana Lauraceae 2,25 0 59 Podocarpus spec.div. Pinheirinho Podocarpaceae 2,25 2 60 Pinus spec.div. ? Grenen, Philipijns Pinaceae 2,25 0 61 Pinus sylvestris L. Grenen, inlands Pinaceae 2,25 nu A11 0 62 Thuja plicata Donn ex D.Don Western redcedar Cupressaceae 2,25 49 62 A Thuja plicata Donn ex D.Don Western redcedar Cupressaceae 2,25 0 63 Abies alba Mill. Dennen, Duits Pinaceae 2,25 nu A02 0 64 A Tsuga spec.div. verm. Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg. Hemlock Pinaceae 2,25 14 65 Picea abies Vuren, Zweeds Pinaceae 2,25 nu A09 0 66 Pinus resinosa Aiton (verm.) Pine, Norway (?) Pinaceae 2,25 0 67 Picea spec.div.
Recommended publications
  • Physical, Mechanical, and Other Properties Of
    ARC: 634.9 TA/OST 73-24 C559a PHYSICAL, MECHANICAL, AND OTHER PROPERTIES OF SELECTED SECONDARY SPECIES in Surinam, Peru, Colombia, Nigeria, Gabon, Philippines, and Malaysia FPL-AID-PASA TA(Aj)2-73 (Species Properties) * PHYSICAL, MECHANICAL, AND OTHER PROPERTIES OF SELECTED SECONDARY SPECIES LOCATED IN SURINAM, PERU, COLOMBIA, NIGERIA, GABON, PHILIPPINES, AND MALAYSIA MARTIN CHUDNOFF, Forest Products Technologist Forest Products Laboratory Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Madison, Wisconsin 53705 November 1973 Prepared for AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT U.S. Department of State Washington, DC 20523 ARC No. 634.9 - C 559a INTRODUCTION This report is a partial response to a Participating Agency Service Agreement between the Agency for Inter­ national Development and the USDA, Forest Service (PASA Control No. TA(AJ)2-73) and concerns a study of the factors influencing the utilization of the tropical forest resource. The purpose of this portion of the PASA obligation is to present previously published information on the tree and wood characteristics of selected secondary species growing m seven tropical countries. The format is concise and follows the outline developed for the second edition of the "Handbook of Hardwoods" published by HMSO, London. Species selected for review are well known in the source countries, but make up a very small component, if any, of their export trade. The reasons why these species play a secondary role in the timber harvest are discussed in the other accompanying PASA reports. ii INDEX Pages SURINAM 1-11 Audira spp. Eperu falcata Eschweilera spp. Micropholis guyanensis Nectandra spp. Ocotea spp. Parinari campestris Parinari excelsa Pouteria engleri Protium spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Grou Di Formatio O the Co Servatio Status of Bubi Ga Ad We Ge Tree
    BACK GROUD IFORMATIO O THE COSERVATIO STATUS OF BUBIGA AD WEGE TREE SPECIES I AFRICA COUTRIES Report prepared for the International Tropical Timber Organization (ITTO). by Dr Jean Lagarde BETTI, ITTO - CITES Project Africa Regional Coordinator, University of Douala, Cameroon Tel: 00 237 77 30 32 72 [email protected] June 2012 1 TABLE OF COTET TABLE OF CONTENT......................................................................................................... 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS................................................................................................... 4 ABREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. 5 ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................... 6 0. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................10 I. MATERIAL AND METHOD...........................................................................................11 1.1. Study area..................................................................................................................11 1.2. Method ......................................................................................................................12 II. BIOLOGICAL DATA .....................................................................................................14 2.1. Distribution of Bubinga and Wengé species in Africa.................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Middle to Late Paleocene Leguminosae Fruits and Leaves from Colombia
    AUTHORS’ PAGE PROOFS: NOT FOR CIRCULATION CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Systematic Botany https://doi.org/10.1071/SB19001 Middle to Late Paleocene Leguminosae fruits and leaves from Colombia Fabiany Herrera A,B,D, Mónica R. Carvalho B, Scott L. Wing C, Carlos Jaramillo B and Patrick S. Herendeen A AChicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, IL 60022, USA. BSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Republic of Panamá. CDepartment of Paleobiology, NHB121, PO Box 37012, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013, USA. DCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Leguminosae are one of the most diverse flowering-plant groups today, but the evolutionary history of the family remains obscure because of the scarce early fossil record, particularly from lowland tropics. Here, we report ~500 compression or impression specimens with distinctive legume features collected from the Cerrejón and Bogotá Formations, Middle to Late Paleocene of Colombia. The specimens were segregated into eight fruit and six leaf 5 morphotypes. Two bipinnate leaf morphotypes are confidently placed in the Caesalpinioideae and are the earliest record of this subfamily. Two of the fruit morphotypes are placed in the Detarioideae and Dialioideae. All other fruit and leaf morphotypes show similarities with more than one subfamily or their affinities remain uncertain. The abundant fossil fruits and leaves described here show that Leguminosae was the most important component of the earliest rainforests in northern South America c. 60–58 million years ago. Additional keywords: diversity, Fabaceae, fossil plants, legumes, Neotropics, South America. Received 10 January 2019, accepted 5 April 2019, published online dd mmm yyyy Introduction dates for the crown clades ranging from the Cretaceous to the – Leguminosae, the third-largest family of flowering plants with Early Paleogene, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Large‐Scale Genomic Sequence Data Resolve the Deepest Divergences in the Legume Phylogeny and Support a Near‐Simultaneous Evolutionary Origin of All Six Subfamilies
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 Large‐scale genomic sequence data resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny and support a near‐simultaneous evolutionary origin of all six subfamilies Koenen, Erik J M ; Ojeda, Dario I ; Steeves, Royce ; Migliore, Jérémy ; Bakker, Freek T ; Wieringa, Jan J ; Kidner, Catherine ; Hardy, Olivier J ; Pennington, R Toby ; Bruneau, Anne ; Hughes, Colin E Abstract: Phylogenomics is increasingly used to infer deep‐branching relationships while revealing the complexity of evolutionary processes such as incomplete lineage sorting, hybridization/introgression and polyploidization. We investigate the deep‐branching relationships among subfamilies of the Leguminosae (or Fabaceae), the third largest angiosperm family. Despite their ecological and economic importance, a robust phylogenetic framework for legumes based on genome‐scale sequence data is lacking. We generated alignments of 72 chloroplast genes and 7621 homologous nuclear‐encoded proteins, for 157 and 76 taxa, respectively. We analysed these with maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference, and a multispecies coa- lescent summary method, and evaluated support for alternative topologies across gene trees. We resolve the deepest divergences in the legume phylogeny despite lack of phylogenetic signal across all chloroplast genes and the majority of nuclear genes. Strongly supported conflict in the remainder of nuclear genes is suggestive of incomplete lineage sorting. All six subfamilies originated nearly simultaneously, suggesting that the prevailing view of some subfamilies as ‘basal’ or ‘early‐diverging’ with respect to others should be abandoned, which has important implications for understanding the evolution of legume diversity and traits.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in Antibacterial Activity of Schotia Species
    South African Journal of Botany 2002, 68: 41–46 Copyright © NISC Pty Ltd Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY ISSN 0254–6299 Variation in antibacterial activity of Schotia species LJ McGaw, AK Jäger and J van Staden* Research Centre for Plant Growth and Development, School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal Pietermaritzburg, Private Bag X01, Scottsville 3209, South Africa * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Received 29 March 2001, accepted in revised form 7 June 2001 The roots and bark of Schotia brachypetala are used in ture, or as an extract residue at -15°C, had little effect on South African traditional medicine as a remedy for the antibacterial activity. In general, the ethanolic dysentery and diarrhoea. The paucity of pharmacologi- extracts were more active than the aqueous extracts. cal and chemical data on this plant prompted an inves- The chemical profiles on TLC chromatograms were tigation into its antibacterial activity. The differences in compared and found to be very similar in the case of activity of ethanol and water extracts with respect to ethanol extracts prepared in different months of the plant part, season and geographical position were year, and from different trees. The extracts of the three analysed. No extreme fluctuations in activity were species and of the leaves stored under various condi- noted. Two other Schotia species, S. afra and S. capita- tions also showed similar TLC fingerprints, however, ta, were included in the study, and both displayed good various plant parts of S. brachypetala showed distinctly in vitro antibacterial activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand Structure and the Genetic Diversity of Koompassia
    Sains Malaysiana 36(2)(2007): 233-242 Stand Structure and the Genetic Diversity of Koompassia malaccensis and Dryobalanops aromatica in Unlogged and Logged-over Stands (Struktur Dirian dan Kepelbagaian Genetik Koompassia Malaccensis dan Dryobalanops Aromatica pada Dirian yang Belum dan yang telah Dibalak) KIM SU LEE, RATNAM WICKNESWARI & CHEE YEN CHOONG ABSTRACT The disturbance level of two nearby logged stands, Compartment 118 and Compartment 69 were studied in Ulu Sedili Forest Reserve, Johor. The mean basal area for trees (trees ! 1 cm dbh) in logged stand of Compartment 118 showed 51% reduction in comparison to immediately before logging of the same stand. A similar level of reduction (47%) was observed for mean density of trees in Compartment 118. However, the mean basal area and mean density of tree were higher in 50-year logged Compartment 69 (21% and 122% respectively) compared to Compartment 118 before logging. Concurrently, we examined the effects of logging on genetic diversity of seedling, sapling and mature trees of two important timber species, Koompassia malaccensis and Dryobalanops aromatica using M13 universal primer (multilocus minisatellite DNA) and three other universally-primed primers. Mature trees of K. malaccensis showed 39% reduction in Shannon diversity index (H) in Compartment 69 compared to Compartment 118 before logging detected by M13 universal primer. This may be attributed to the small sample size of the species in Compartment 69. Reduction in H and polymorphic loci (P) for K. malaccensis was higher in seedlings, 5% and 56% respectively in Compartment 69 compared to mature trees (3% and 23% respectively). Contrastingly for seedlings and saplings of D.
    [Show full text]
  • NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists
    NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE REPORT FOR HANS HOHEISEN WILDLIFE RESEARCH STATION Compiled by Ben Orban, PriSciNat. June 2013 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC. - Reg No: 16549023 / PO Box 11644, Hatfield, Pretoria. Our reference: NABRO / HHWRS/V01 NABRO Ecological Analysts CC Natural Asset and Botanical Resource Ordinations Environmental Consultants & Wildlife Specialists CONTENTS 1 SPECIALIST INVESTIGATORS ............................................................................... 3 2 DECLARATION ............................................................................................................ 3 3 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 3 4 LOCALITY OF STUDY AREA .................................................................................... 4 4.1 Location ................................................................................................................... 4 5 INFRASTRUCTURE ..................................................................................................... 4 5.1 Fencing ..................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Camps ...................................................................................................................... 4 5.3 Buildings ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank (Refer to Table
    COPYRIGHT AND CITATION CONSIDERATIONS FOR THIS THESIS/ DISSERTATION o Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. o NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. o ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. How to cite this thesis Surname, Initial(s). (2012) Title of the thesis or dissertation. PhD. (Chemistry)/ M.Sc. (Physics)/ M.A. (Philosophy)/M.Com. (Finance) etc. [Unpublished]: University of Johannesburg. Retrieved from: https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za (Accessed: Date). ` The assessment of DNA barcoding as an identification tool for traded and protected trees in southern Africa: Mozambican commercial timber species as a case study By Ronny Mukala Kabongo Dissertation presented in the fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTIAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY AND PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: PROF MICHELLE VAN DER BANK CO-SUPERVISOR: DR. OLIVIER MAURIN January 2014 I hereby declare that this dissertation has been composed by me and work contained within unless stated otherwise, is my own. Signed: Ronny Mukala Kabongo Date: 30 January 2013 Table of Contents Table of Contents .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Guidelines for Reforestation at Ex-Coal-Mining Areas
    Technical Guidelines for Reforestation at Ex-Coal-Mining Areas - Based on the outcomes of experimental reforestation activities at ex-coal-mining areas in South Kalimantan, Indonesia - Japan International Forestry Promotion and Cooperation Center (JIFPRO) March 2015 Technical Guidelines for Reforestation at Ex-Coal-Mining Areas - Based on the outcomes of experimental reforestation activities at ex-coal-mining areas in South Kalimantan, Indonesia - Eiichiro Nakama, Seiichi Ohta, Yasuo Ohsumi, Tokunori Mori and Satohiko Sasaki Japan International Forestry Promotion and Cooperation Center Fakhrur Razie, Hamdani Fauzi and Mahrus Aryadi Lambung Mangkurat University, Indonesia Japan International Forestry Promotion and Cooperation Center March 2015 Foreword During the past decades, deforestation and forest degradation continues especially in developing countries. According to the report of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation (FAO), approximately 13 million hectors of global forests have been lost annually due to forest land conversion to other land uses, forest fires and natural disasters, while reforestation and natural regeneration account for an increase of approx. 7.8 million hectors of forest cover. This means the net loss of global forest is estimated at 5.2 million hectors. Adverse impacts of forest conversion to farmland can be minimized as far as the land is properly used and managed in a sustainable manner. However, in some cases, problem soils are exposed and abandoned as degraded land. Deforestation by mining is a big issue these years. Problem soils such as strong acid soils and/or too much heavy metal soils appear at the ex-mining areas. In some cases it is too difficult to reforestate.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Germination, Seedling Survival and Storage Behavior of Koompassia Excelsa (Leguminosae)
    NUSANTARA BIOSCIENCE ISSN: 2087-3948 Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 46-49 E-ISSN: 2087-3956 May 2020 DOI: 10.13057/nusbiosci/n120108 Short Communication: Seed germination, seedling survival and storage behavior of Koompassia excelsa (Leguminosae) DIAN LATIFAH♥, FITRI FATMA WARDANI, RIZMOON NURUL ZULKARNAEN Research Center for Plant Conservation and Botanic Gardens, Indonesian Institute of Sciences. Jl. Ir. H.Juanda no. 13, Bogor 16122, West Java, Indonesia. Tel./fax.: +62-251-8322187, ♥email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 25 November 2019. Revision accepted: 14 February 2020. Abstract. Latifah D, Wardani FF, Zulkarnaen RN. 2020. Seed germination, seedling survival and storage behavior of Koompassia excelsa (Leguminosae). Nusantara Bioscience 12: 46-49. Koompassia excelsa (Becc.) Taub. (Leguminosae) is an important component of many tropical rainforests as an emergent canopy tree. Knowledge and application of germination strategies and increasing seedling survival of this species in many conservation efforts are essential as it is endemic to several areas in Southeast Asia. This research investigated the effects of the different moisture levels of the sowing media on the germination and seedling survival percentage of K. excelsa. The seeds exhibited faster germination percentage and higher seedling survival when sown in media with 33.2%-moisture. The seeds appeared to have intermediate storage behavior. Thus, sowing seeds in 33.2%-moisture media may promote seedling survival, which is an important part of regeneration as well as conservation of K. excelsa. Keywords: Germination, Koompassia excelsa, media, seedling, storage INTRODUCTION orthodox (Sasaki 1976, Sasaki 1980), K. excelsa seeds have been cryopreserved successfully for long-term storage Koompassia excelsa is distributed across Southeast (Azman 2015) indicating the seed storage behavior was Asia, including Indonesia (Sumatera and Borneo Islands), intermediate.
    [Show full text]
  • MUTENYE Page 1Of 4
    MUTENYE Page 1of 4 Family: FABACEAE-CAESALPINIOIDEAE (angiosperm) Scientific name(s): Guibourtia arnoldiana Commercial restriction: no commercial restriction WOOD DESCRIPTION LOG DESCRIPTION Color: brown Diameter: from 40 to 80 cm Sapwood: clearly demarcated Thickness of sapwood: from 5 to 8 cm Texture: fine Floats: no Grain: straight or interlocked Log durability: moderate (treatment recommended) Interlocked grain: slight Note: Heartwood yellowish brown to brown presenting a dark striping or reddish glints. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES MECHANICAL AND ACOUSTIC PROPERTIES Physical and mechanical properties are based on mature heartwood specimens. These properties can vary greatly depending on origin and growth conditions. Mean Std dev. Mean Std dev. Specific gravity *: 0,79 0,05 Crushing strength *: 79 MPa 10 MPa Monnin hardness *: 5,9 2,1 Static bending strength *: 138 MPa 14 MPa Coeff. of volumetric shrinkage: 0,56 % 0,06 % Modulus of elasticity *: 21250 MPa 4700 MPa Total tangential shrinkage (TS): 8,8 % 0,7 % Total radial shrinkage (RS): 5,0 % 0,6 % (*: at 12% moisture content, with 1 MPa = 1 N/mm²) TS/RS ratio: 1,8 Fiber saturation point: 27 % Musical quality factor: 123,4 measured at 2734 Hz Stability: moderately stable NATURAL DURABILITY AND TREATABILITY Fungi and termite resistance refers to end-uses under temperate climate. Except for special comments on sapwood, natural durability is based on mature heartwood. Sapwood must always be considered as non-durable against wood degrading agents. E.N. = Euro Norm Funghi (according to E.N. standards): class 3 - moderately durable Dry wood borers: durable - sapwood demarcated (risk limited to sapwood) Termites (according to E.N. standards): class M - moderately durable Treatability (according to E.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research Volume: 10 | Issue: 01| Jan
    Middle East Journal of Agriculture Research Volume: 10 | Issue: 01| Jan. - March| 2021 EISSN: 2706-7955 ISSN: 2077-4605 DOI: 10.36632/mejar/2021.10.1.13 Journal homepage: www.curresweb.com Pages: 227-237 Plant genetic barcoding of some Legume tree species grown in Egypt Houssam El-Din M.F. El-Wakil1, Aly Z. Abdelsalam2, Hesham M. Aly3, Asma Aboshady2, Samar M.A. Rabie1, Mohamed E. Hasan4 and Nader R. Abdelsalam1 1 Agricultural Botany Department Faculty of Agriculture, Saba-Basha, Alexandria University, Egypt. 2 Genetics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain-Shams University, Egypt. 3 Department of Forestry and Wood Technology, Horticulture Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Antoniadis Botanical Garden, Alexandria 21554, Egypt. 4Bioinformatic Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Egypt Received: 20 December 2020 Accepted: 10 February 2021 Published: 25 February 2021 ABSTRACT DNA barcoding as tools for rapid species documentation based on DNA sequences. During the current study fifteen species were collected, belonged to family fabacea from Antoniades Garden Alexandria between July 2019 and January 2020 RbcL and matK of the plastid genomes were used to study the sequence of the nucleotides bases of these genetic materials, alignment the current genetic sequence which obtained from NCBI and CBOL and matched the observed sequence with other in the GeneBank, calculating the differential between the different species of trees using precise genetic coding instead of the phenotypic distinction and finding the evolutionary relationship between the types of these trees. The results showed that the quality of the extracted DNA which detected by using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis there were no fragmentation was observed in extracted DNA.
    [Show full text]