DOCSLIB.ORG

In Weight Percent

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Weight Percent Bass Islands Dolomite Keyser Limestone (lower) and Salina Group Keyser Limestone (lower) and Salina Group Big Mountain Shale through Tonoloway Limestone Bass Islands Dolomite Bass Islands Dolomite Bass Islands Dolomite Bass Islands Dolomite Bass Islands Dolomite and Camillus Shale Bass Islands Dolomite and Camillus Shale Bass Islands Dolomite and Camillus Shale Bass Islands Dolomite and Camillus Shale Bass Islands Dolomite through Salina Group Bass Islands Dolomite and Salina Group Bass Islands Dolomite and Salina Group Bass Islands Dolomite and Salina Group Bass Islands Dolomite through Tonoloway Limestone Bass Islands Dolomite through Tonoloway Limestone Bass Islands Dolomite and Camillus Shale Keyser Formation Keyser Formation and Camillus Shale Keyser Limestone (lower) through Wills Creek Formation Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Camillus Shale Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Syracuse Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation Vernon Formation and Wills Creek Formation Vernon Formation and Lockport Dolomite Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group Salina Group and Wills Creek Formation Salina Group and Wills Creek Formation Salina Group and Wills Creek Formation Salina Group and Wills Creek Formation Salina Group and McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group and McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through McKenzie Limestone Salina Group through Rose Hill Formation Salina Group through Rose Hill Formation Salina Group through Rose Hill Formation Tonoloway Formation Tonoloway Formation Tonoloway Limestone Tonoloway Limestone Tonoloway Limestone Tonoloway Limestone Tonoloway Limestone and Wills Creek Formation Tonoloway Limestone and Wills Creek Formation Tonoloway Limestone and Wills Creek Formation Tonoloway Limestone Tonoloway Limestone through McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation through Rose Hill Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Member Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation and McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone Wills Creek Formation through Rose Hill Formation Base of Upper Silurian Salina Group and Wills Creek Formation Wills Creek Formation Eramosa Dolomite Eramosa Dolomite Eramosa Dolomite Top of Lower to Upper Silurian McKenzie Limestone and Lockport Dolomite (or Group) Eramosa Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite Lockport Dolomite and Rochester Shale Lockport Dolomite and Rochester Shale McKenzie Member Stratigraphic interval of sample, in approximate ascending order McKenzie Member McKenzie Member McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Limestone McKenzie Member McKenzie Member McKenzie Limestone through Rose Hill Formation McKenzie Limestone through Rose Hill Formation McKenzie Limestone through Rose Hill Formation Base of Lower and Upper Silurian McKenzie Limestone and Lockport Dolomite (or Group) McKenzie Limestone and Keefer Sandstone Rose Hill Formation McKenzie Limestone through Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Top of Lower Silurian Cabot Head Shale, Rochester Shale, or Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rose Hill Formation Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale Rochester Shale and Lower Silurian carbonates and shales, undivided Rochester Shale and Lower Silurian carbonates and shales, undivided Lower Silurian carbonates and shales, undivided Castanea Member of Tuscarora Formation Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale EXPLANATION Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Locality of sample Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale New York Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Pennsylvania Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Ohio Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale West Virginia Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Stratigraphic boundary Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale Cabot Head Shale 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 Total organic carbon (TOC), in weight percent Figure 5. Histogram showing total organic carbon (TOC) values (in weight percent) for Silurian rocks sampled in this study. The probable stratigraphic units that yielded the TOC values are underlined. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1708–G.11.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Message from the New Chairman
    Subcommission on Devonian Stratigraphy Newsletter No. 21 April, 2005 MESSAGE FROM THE NEW CHAIRMAN Dear SDS Members: This new Newsletter gives me the pleasant opportunity to thank you for your confidence which should allow me to lead our Devonian Subcommission successfully through the next four years until the next International Geological Congress in Norway. Ahmed El Hassani, as Vice-Chairman, and John Marshall, as our new Secretary, will assist and help me. As it has been our habit in the past, our outgoing chairman, Pierre Bultynck, has continued his duties until the end of the calendar year, and in the name of all the Subcommission, I like to express our warmest thanks to him for all his efforts, his enthusi- asm for our tasks, his patience with the often too slow progress of research, and for the humorous, well organized and skil- ful handling of our affairs, including our annual meetings. At the same time I like to thank all our outgoing Titular Members for their partly long-time service and I express my hope that they will continue their SDS work with the same interest and energy as Corresponding Members. The new ICS rules require a rather constant change of voting members and the change from TM to CM status should not necessarily be taken as an excuse to adopt the lifestyle of a “Devonian pensioner”. I see no reason why constantly active SDS members shouldn´t become TM again, at a later stage. On the other side, the rather strong exchange of voting members should bring in some fresh ideas and some shift towards modern stratigraphical tech- niques.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Framework And
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 2916 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (SHEET 2 OF 2) Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map 82° 80° 78° 82° 80° 78° Table 1.—Wells used to construct cross section F–F '. Refer to figure 2 for well locations. Also shown are perforated intervals, initial production flow per day, and reservoir names. Lake Ontario [Reservoirs: C, “Clinton” sandstone; M, Medina sandstone; T, Tuscarora Sandstone. Oil and gas production terms: AF, after hydrofracturing; BO, barrels of oil; BW, barrels of water; MCFG, thousand cubic feet of gas; N, natural (no stimulation of reservoir); OH, open hole (no casing with perforations); P&A, plugged and abandoned; TA, temporarily abandoned; TO, trace of oil; TW, trace of water. Well that connects section F–F ' with section A–A' shown as 81, A–A' (54); number in parentheses refers to well 54 on section A–A' . A' Lake Ontario —, no data] A' Map American Township Date of Perforated or open hole Initial production flow Orleans Company Lease County/State Reservoirs no. Petroleum (7.5–min quadrangle) log run interval (depth in ft) of natural gas, oil, Niagara Institute no. and water (per day) Ontario Erie 1 34–089–22051 Southern Triangle Oil Co. No. 1 Swetnam Comm. Licking/Ohio Burlington 11–27–63 — P&A, 11–29–63; 1,200 MCFG, — N (from “Clinton” in nearby well No. 1 Houck, 6–30–1905) Lake Erie 2 34–089–22300 Lake Shore Pipeline Co. No. 1 Shipley Licking Burlington 12–13–65 — P&A, 12–12–65; 1,200 MCFG, — B N (from “Clinton” in nearby well No.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Poster
    EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STACKED SHALE-GAS RESERVOIRS ACROSS NORTHERN AND NORTH-CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA ABSTRACT Jessica Pierson Moore1, Susan E. Pool1, Philip A. Dinterman1, J. Eric Lewis1, Ray Boswell2 Three shale-gas units underlying northern and north-central West Virginia create opportunity for one horizontal well pad to produce from multiple zones. The Upper Ordovician Utica/Point Pleasant, Middle Devonian Marcellus, and Upper Devonian Burket/Geneseo 1 West Virginia Geological & Economic Survey, 2 U.S. DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory construction of fairway maps for each play. Current drilling activity focuses on the Marcellus, with more than 1,000 horizontal completions reported through mid-2015. Across northern West Virginia, the Marcellus is 40 to 60 ft. thick with a depth range between 5,000 and 8,000 ft. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) REGIONAL GEOLOGY is generally 10% or greater. Quartz content is relatively high (~60%) and clay content is low (~30%). Reservoir pressure estimates STRUCTURAL CROSS-SECTION FROM HARRISON CO., OHIO TO HARDY CO., WEST VIRGINIA range from 0.3 to 0.7 psi/ft and generally increase to the north. Volumetric assessment of the Marcellus in this area yields preliminary NW SE 81° 80° 79° 78° 1 2 3 4 5 original gas-in-place estimates of 9 to 24 Bcf/mi2. OH WV WV WV WV Pennsylvania Figure 2.—Location of seismic sections, wells, and major basement Harrison Co. Marshall Co. Marion Co. Preston Co. Hardy Co. 34-067-20103 47-051-00539 47-049-00244 47-077-00119 47-031-00021 UTICA SHALE PLAY GR 41 miles GR 36 miles GR 27 miles GR 32 miles GR Westmoreland The Burket /Geneseo interval is approximately 15 to 40 ft thick across the fairway.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic Paleozoic Cambrian Ordovician Silurian Devonian
    Approximate location of Burley No. 1 well Seismic Stratigraphic Extensional and Thrust Age West Formation or Group Name East Lithology Packages Orogenic Events Sheets Perm. Lower Upper Post-Pottsville rocks, undivided Pottsville Group and Middle post-Pottsville rocks Alleghanian orogeny Penn. Lower Pottsville Group Upper Greenbrier Limestone and Mauch Chunk Group Greenbrier Limestone Miss. Lower Berea Sandstone, Sunbury Shale, and Price Formation Venango Group Venango Group (Formation) Hampshire Formation and Riceville Formation Chagrin Shale Bradford Group Bradford Group Huron Mbr. of Greenland Gap Group the Ohio Shale Upper Salina sheet Acadian orogeny Java Formation Angola Shale Member Devonian West Falls Elk Group Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Brallier Formation Elk Group Sonyea Formation Genesee Formation Harrell Shale Middle Tully Limestone, Hamilton Group, Marcellus Shale, and Onondaga Limestone Hamilton Group Lower Oriskany Sandstone and Helderberg Group Upper Salina Group (includes salt beds) Salina Group, Tonoloway Limestone, and Wills Creek Formation and Wills Creek Formation Salina Group Paleozoic Lockport Dolomite and Keefer Sandstone McKenzie Limestone and Keefer Sandstone Silurian Rose Hill Formation Lower Reedsville- Tuscarora Sandstone Taconic orogeny Martinsburg Juniata Formation Juniata Formation sheet Oswego Sandstone Upper Reedsville Shale (Utica Shale at base) Reedsville Shale Trenton Limestone Trenton Limestone Black River Limestone Middle Ordovician Knox unconformity Beekmantown Group Beekmantown Group ? Passive continental Lower Rome- margin modified Waynesboro Upper sandstone member of the Copper Ridge Dolomite of the Knox Group by Rome trough sheet Upper extension Copper Ridge Dolomite of the Knox Group Knox Group and Middle pre-Knox rocks Conasauga Group and Rome Formation Cambrian Lower Autochthonous Grenvillian basement Grenvillian Grenvillian basement basement Proterozoic Figure 3.--Correlation chart of Paleozoic and Proterozoic rocks in the study area and associated thrust sheets.
    [Show full text]
  • Xsec A-A Sht1of2 Layout FINAL V
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3425 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY (SHEET 1 OF 2) Explanatory pamphlet accompanies map A Ontario Allegheny Lowlands Plateau province province SEVERNE WATKINS-BEAVER LODI POINT FIRTREE DAMS ALPINE VAN ETTEN ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE ANTICLINE GLENORA SYNCLINE UNNAMED COHOCTON CORBETT POINT ENFIELD CAYUTA SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE SYNCLINE Bend in section Bend in section Bend in section New York W SE Oatka Genesee NW SE Canisteo NW SW Pennsylvania Black Creek River Canaseraga River Tuscarora Creek Creek Creek FEET MILES 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 3,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 William Duchscherer, Jr. E.F. Blair and Associates NYS Natural Gas Company E.F. Blair and Associates Bowdoin Storage Service Inc. NYS Natural Gas Company No. 1 J. Klotzbach No. 1 L. Tyler No. 1 Albert McClurg No. 1 Arthur N. Kennedy No. 1 Hubbard No. 1 Robert Olin API No. 31-037-05117 API No. 31-037-04593 API No. 31-051-04552 API No. 31-051-04630 API No. 31-101-21496 API No. 31-101-03924 Genesee Co., New York Genesee Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Livingston Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Steuben Co., New York Perrysburg Formation Dunkirk Dunkirk Shale Shale 2,000 Member Wiscoy Sandstone Member Java Perrysburg West River Shale, Nunda Wiscoy Sandstone Member Formation Formation Genundewa Sandstone Member unnamed Pipe Creek 0 Pipe Creek shale member Limestone, Penn Member Shale Member Shale Member Perrysburg Yan Shale, and rmation Formation 0 Dun West River Shale, Java Fo kirk
    [Show full text]
  • Unraveling the Central Appalachian Fold-Thrust Belt, Pennsylvania: the Power of Sequentially Restored Balanced Cross Sections for a Blind Fold-Thrust Belt
    Unraveling the central Appalachian fold-thrust belt, Pennsylvania: The power of sequentially restored balanced cross sections for a blind fold-thrust belt Peter B. Sak1, Nadine McQuarrie2,*, Benjamin P. Oliver2,*, Natasha Lavdovsky2, and Margaret S. Jackson1,* 1Department of Earth Sciences, Dickinson College, Carlisle, Pennsylvania 17013, USA 2Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA ABSTRACT Anticlinorium, the northernmost structure of example of a blind thrust system. At its north- the fold-thrust belt that cuts upsection from ernmost end, the fold-thrust belt sweeps east- We present a kinematic model for the the Cambrian Waynesboro Formation to the ward, creating the broad arc of the Pennsylvania sequential development of the Appalachian Silurian Salina décollement. Because the fault salient (Fig. 1). Although previous research in fold-thrust belt (eastern U.S.) across a clas- that cores the Nittany Anticlinorium can only the central Appalachians has made considerable sic transect through the Pennsylvania salient. facilitate 10 km of shortening on the plateau, progress toward quantifying how shortening New map and strain data are used to create an early history of Appalachian Plateau LPS is distributed among microscopic (e.g., Smart a balanced geologic cross section from the in Silurian and younger rocks is required to et al., 1997; Thorbjornsen and Dunne, 1997), southern edge of the Valley and Ridge Prov- balance the section. We propose that the addi- mesoscopic (e.g., Smart et al., 1997; Hogan
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources
    COMMISSION OF MARYLAND GEOLOGICAL SURVEY S. JAMES CAMPBELL Towson RICHARD W. COOPER Salisbury JOHN C. GEYER Baltimore ROBERT C. HARVEY Frostburg M. GORDON WOLMAN Baltimore PREFACE In 1906 the Maryland Geological Survey published a report on "The Physical Features of Maryland", which was mainly an account of the geology and min- eral resources of the State. It included a brief outline of the geography, a more extended description of the physiography, and chapters on the soils, climate, hydrography, terrestrial magnetism and forestry. In 1918 the Survey published a report on "The Geography of Maryland", which covered the same fields as the earlier report, but gave only a brief outline of the geology and added chap- ters on the economic geography of the State. Both of these reports are now out of print. Because of the close relationship of geography and geology and the overlap in subject matter, the two reports were revised and combined into a single volume and published in 1957 as Bulletin 19 of the Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources. The Bulletin has been subsequently reprinted in 1961 and 1966. Some revisions in statistical data were made in the 1961 and 1968 reprints. Certain sections of the Bulletin were extensively revised by Dr. Jona- than Edwards in this 1974 reprint. The Introduction, Mineral Resources, Soils and Agriculture, Seafood Industries, Commerce and Transportation and Manu- facturing chapters of the book have received the most revision and updating. The chapter on Geology and Physiography was not revised. This report has been used extensively in the schools of the State, and the combination of Geology and Geography in one volume allows greater latitude in adapting it to use as a reference or textbook at various school levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Valley, Units 1 & 2, Davis-Besse & Perry, Response To
    FENOC 76 South Main Street Fi/rstEn Akron. Ohio 44308 SamuelL. Belcher Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer September11,2013 L-13-245 10cFR 50.54(f) ATTN: DocumentControl Desk U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville,MD 20852 SUBJECT. BeaverValley Power Station, Unit Nos. 1 and2 DocketNo. 50-334, License No. DPR-66 DocketNo. 50-412, License No. NPF-73 Davis-BesseNuclear Power Station DocketNo. 50-346, License No. NPF-3 PerryNuclear Power Plant DocketNo. 50-440, License No. NPF-58 FirstEnergyNuclear Operatinq Companv (FENOC) Response to NRCRequest for InformationPursuant to 10CFR 50.54(fl Reqarding_the Seismic Aspects of Recommendation2.1 of the Near-TermTask Force (NTTF) Review of Insiqhtsfrom the FukushimaDai-ichi Accident - 1.5Year Response for CEUS Sites On March12,2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a fettertitled, "Requestfor InformationPursuant to Title10 of the Codeof FederalRegulations 50.54(f)Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-TermTask Force Reviewof Insightsfrom the FukushimaDai-ichi Accident," to all powerreactor licensees andholders of constructionpermits in activeor deferredstatus. Enclosure 1 of the 10 CFR50.54(0 letter contains a requestfor each addressee in the Centraland Eastern UnitedStates (CEUS) to submita writtenresponse consistent with the requested seismichazard evatuation information (items 1 through7) within 1.5 years of thedate of the 10CFR 50.54(0 letter (by September 12,2013). By letterdated February 15,2013, the NRCendorsed the Electrical Power Research Institute (EPRI) Report 1025287, SersmicEvaluation Guidance: Screening, Prioritization and lmplementationDetails (SPID)for the Resolutionof FukushimaNear-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1: Seismic,dated November 2012 (hereafter referred to asthe SPID report) Section 4 of theSPID report identifies the detailed information to be included in the seismic hazard evaluationsubmittals BeaverValley Power Station, Unit Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    University of Alberta NEW PORASPIDINE HETEROSTRACANS FROM THE LOCHKOVIAN (EARLY DEVONIAN) MAN ON THE HILL LOCALITY, MACKENZIE MOUNTAINS, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, CANADA, AND THE PHYLOGENY AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF PORASPIDINAE by Jessica Rae Hawthorn © A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Systematics and Evolution Department of Biological Sciences Edmonton, Alberta Spring 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 OttawaONK1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54698-7 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-54698-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Nntemet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2 (Pdf)
    South North West East West East West East West East Eastern Kentucky Central West Virginia Eastern and Central Ohio Western and Central Pennsylvania Western and Central New York Age Stratigraphy from: Repetski and others (2008) Stratigraphy from: Ryder and others (2008, 2009) Stratigraphy from: Ryder and others (2008, 2009, 2010) Stratigraphy from: Berg and others (1983); Ryder and others (2010) Stratigraphy from: Repetski and others (2008) Era System Series (Ma) Valley Valley Rome Trough Rome Trough Rome Trough and Ridge Bedford Shale and Ridge Cleveland Member Venango Group Catskill Formation 359.2 Upper Devonian strata, undivided Ohio Shale Ohio Three Lick Bed Chagrin Shale equivalent rocks Chagrin Shale Bradford Group Foreknobs Formation Perrysburg Formation Shale Dunkirk Shale Member Huron Member of Ohio Shale Huron Member Elk Group Scherr Formation Upper Dunkirk Shale Java Formation Angola Shale Member Olentangy Shale (upper) Java Formation Java Formation Angola Shale Member West Falls West Falls Brallier Formation West Falls Angola Shale Member Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Rhinestreet Shale Member of the Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Formation Rhinestreet Shale Member Upper Devonian strata, undivided West Falls Formation 385.3 Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Sonyea and Genesee Formations, undivided Tully Limestone Tully Limestone Tully Limestone Mahantango Formation Mahantango Formation Moscow, Ludlowville, and Skaneateles Shales, undivided Hamilton Olentangy Shale (lower)
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic-GIS Data for Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial alpo_jofl_geology.pdf Version: 5/11/2020 I Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial Table of Contents Geologic Resourc..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n..t.o...r.y.. .M...a..p.. .D...o..c..u..m...e...n..t............................................................................ 1 About the NPS Ge..o..l.o..g..i.c... .R..e..s..o..u...r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n...t.o..r.y.. .P...r.o..g...r.a..m............................................................... 3 GRI Digital Maps a..n...d.. .S..o..u...r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C...i.t.a..t.i.o...n..s.................................................................................. 5 Index Map .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Digital Bedrock Geologic-GIS Map of Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site, John..s..t..o..w...n.. .F..l.o..o...d.. .N...a..t.i.o..n..a..l. .M...e..m...o...r.i.a..l. .a..n..d... .V..i.c..i.n..i.t.y.................................................. 7 Map Unit Lis.t................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Map Unit De.s..c..r.i.p..t.io..n..s...................................................................................................................................................... 8 PNcc - Cas.s..e..l.m...a..n.
    [Show full text]