DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildlife Conservation Regulations, 1971 (L.I. 685)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wildlife Conservation Regulations, 1971 (L.I. 685) L,I, 685, Wll,DLIFE CONSERVATION REGULATIONS, 1971 .ARRANGEME:NT OF REGULATIONS PART l-R,ESTRlCTIONS ON HUN:tlNO, BTC, Rf,gulation . ' · I. Animals wholly protected 2. Auimals'partly protected 3. Animals protected in close season 4. Prohibited methods of hunting 5. Offences. PART II-GAME LICENCES 6. Prohibition ofhnritifl~ withouti licence 7. Application for game licence 8. Form and validity of game licence '}, Discretion to grant licence. PART Ill--GAME AND TROPHY ExPORT PBRMITS 10. Application of Part lll 11. Prohibition of exporting without permit 12. Application for game and trophy export permit 13. Form and validity of permit 14. l>iscretion to grant perm1t. PART IV--GENERAL 15. Forfeiture of illegal equipment and apparatus 16. Exemption for Game Officers 17. Killing in defence of person 18. Amendment of Schedules to the Act 19. Revocations, SCHEDULES L.I. 685. 2 WILDLIFE CONSERVATION REGUJ.ATIONS, 1971 ,IN cxcroil)c ot the power:. confcrrod on the.; Prc:,idont by 3cctiono 3 and 11 of 11,e Wild Animals Preservation Act, 1961 (Act 43) these Reg11lations arc hereby made this 4th day of March, 197 J. ' PART 1-.. RESTRICTIONS ON HUNTING) El'C. Animals 1. No person shall at any time hunt, captl,re or destroy any of 1,·holy llie ::ipc(.;ics m1.'.'ntiout:"d in the First Sched11lc to these H,egulations, protected. Animals 2. No person shall at any time hunt, capture or deshoy- Pa.rtly prot<!,:lt!rl. (a) young animals; or (b) animals accompanied by their young, of any of the species mentioned in tl e Second Schedule to these Regulations. Auimals 3. No person shall between the 1st day of August and the 1st day protected in dm1e: of December m ai1y year l1unt, captttre or destroy any of the species season. mentioned in the Second and Third Schedules to these Regulations. Prohibited 4. (1) No person shall manufacture, use or be in possess.ion of methods of lwrtting. any gin trap which may be used for tbepurp(se of hunting, capturing or destroying any animal. (2) No )'.lers011 shall lmnt, capture or destroy any wild animal by using any artificial light or flare. (3) Na person shall hunt, capture or destroy any wild animal by using nets (except in the case of fish or poisonous snakes), unless authorised in writing to do so by the Chief Gatne and Wildlife Officer. (4) No perso11 shall hunt, capture or destroy any wild animal by using pitfalls, snares effective only in conjunction with pitfalls, poison or poisoned weapons. Offences. 5. Any person who contravenes any provision of regulations 1 to 4 shall be ~uilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding two tbundred new cedis or to imprisonment ~ot exceeaing six monlhs or to both. PART 11--GAME LICENCES Prohibition 6, (1) No person shall hunt, capture or destroy- of hunting w1tn out (lT) any adult anim.nl of tho apcoioo mentioned in th~ Second licence, Sched1tle to these Regulations when unaccompanied by its young; or 3 L,J. 685. WILDLIFE CONSERVATIONG REGULATIONS, 1971 (a) any of tl1e species mentioned in the Second and Third Schedules to these Reg~latians outside tbe close season referred to in regulation 3, unless be is the !\older of a valid licenw to ,lo so (hereinafter oallcd "a game licence") granted \ly the Chiel Game and Wildlife Officet in accordance with this Part of these Rebulations. (2) Any person wno contravenes this .regulation shall be guilty of an offence and reliable on summary c-0nvictic,n to a fine not exceeding twc hundred new cedis or to imprisonment not exceeding six niontb s or to botb. 7. (1) Application for a ;;ame lice11ce shall, be tllllde in writing Application to the Chief Game and Wildlife Officer. accompanied by a fee 1>f ii~:,• ten new cedis and by the particulars specified in the Fourtb Schedule to these Regulations. (2) 1'he Chief Game and Wildlife Officer shall not grant a game licence to hunt, capture or destroy any of the aforesaid animals with firearms nnless the applicant satisfies him that be is lawfully in possession of a licence granted under regulation 59 or 60 of the Arms and Ammunition Regulations, 1962 (L.J. 200), authorising him to use a firearm for the µeriod durirtg which he requires af huntillg licence under these Reg1-,Jations. 8. (1) A game licence sliall be itt the form specified in the Fifth Forll) and Schedule to these Regulations and shall- ~~t~. (o) be valid for a fll';tiNrl of s-ix monthR from the date of licence. the grant of the licence; and (b) authorise the hcnting, captt1ring or destroying only of the; specie-.,;: Hsteif in the licence ar:ui 1n nu.mhers not in excess cf the numbers specified in !l;e licence; (c) authcrise the h11nting, capturing or destroying permit­ ted by the Hce11ce to be carried out {;nly by the means specified in tl1e licence. (2) A gatne !ice1,ce tnay be issued subject to s11cl, special c:anditfrn,~ $!nil rP.<:.trif"'.tin:n~ !l~ th~ t1.hil"f Gtifl'I!- an~ "U.7~1rt1ifP Offi('€'1' may in his discretion think iit to impose, a11d such conditions or restrictions shall be endorsed on the licence. (3) A game licence shall oot be trnnsfernbl,. ano shall n<.>t authorise a person to hunt, captr,re or destroy any animal in coll· traven!ion of thse Regulations. L.J. 6SS. 4 WILDLIFE CONSERVA.110N REGULATIONS, 197 I lJisi.;rctfrw 9. (1) ihc !:,f~nt of a r4a-m<; Hcen.cc under these Rc;~datio11s shall to grant licence. he in !he discretion of the Chief Game and Wildlife Officer, and he 1way refuse to grant such lkence- (o) where in his opinion tbc grant of the licence wonld be ,,ndesirable ha,ing reganl to the conservation of the species concerned; or (b) wh~i-<:' thP .1ppli{'!'l.nt ht1<.: hi>-f".n ~nnvir.t,•<1 nf :-'lny offe,nr,~ under these Regulations; or (r:) where he is not satisfied of the Ct)mpetence of the appFcant to use a firearm for hunting, or to recognise the species in respect of which the lteence 1s appt1e<l for. (2) Where for any reason the grant of a licence is refused, the Chief Game and Wildlife Officer shall return tlle fee S\\b1uitted by the applicant. PART Ill-GAME AND TROPHY EXPORT PERMITS Af plii.;aUon 10. Ttte provisions of this Part shall be in addilion lo the ptovi­ I) Part ll. sions of any other law relating to exportating from Ghana. Prohibition 11, (!) No person shall export or attempt to export from ur tiKpoiling without Ghana- permit. (a) any anintal (whether living or dead) of an)' of the species mentioned in the First, Second or l'hird Schedules t.:> these Regulations; or (b) any elephant's tusk; or (c) any hides or skins in commercial quantities, of any of Ute species mentioned in tl,e First, Second or Thiu.l Scbedilles to these Regulations, unless he is the h<:>lder of a valid pern1it to do so (hereinafter called "a game and trophy expert permit") granted by the Chief Orurtc anu Wildlife Offi<:er in accordance wilh this Part of these Regulations. (2) Any person who contravenes this regulation shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary ~onviction to a fine not exceeding two hundred new cedis. Applicatfon 12. Application for a game and trophy export permit shall be for snmo · and trophy made in writing to the Chief Game and Wildlife Olficer accompanied export by a fee of three new cedis and by the particulars specified in the permit. Sixth Schedule to these Regulations. 5 L.I. ·685, WILDLIFE CONSERVATION REGULATIONS, 1971 13. (1) A game and trophy export permit shall be in the form Form and vQ.fipit:, spe<.,1Ueli in Hie Seventh 5t~uellule to t11ese Regulations and ti1lall- of permit. (a) be valid for a period of twelve mcnths from the date of the grant of the licence; and (b) ouly authorise lhe export of iu,ms of .the nature and not in excess of the quantities specified in the permit; (c) only authorise the export of the items to which tne permit relateg in a single consigntnent; (d) only authorise the export of the items to which the pennit relates by the means and from the place specified Jn the permit. (2) A game and trophy export permit may be iss11ed subject to s11ch special conditions anu restrictions as tne Chief Game and Wildlife Officer may in his discretion think fit to impose, and such conditk ns or restrictions shall be endorseo on the permit. (3) Where the holder of a game and trophy export permit contravenes any special cundition or restriction endorseo on tne permit, the permit shall from the time of such contravention be vi)id for all purposes. ( 4) A game and trophy expnrt permit shall 11ot be transferable and shall not at>thorise the export of the items to which it relates in more than one ccnsignment, 14. (1) The grant of a game and trophy export permit shall be Discretion in the discretion of the Chief Game and Wildlife Officer, and he may to grant refuse to grant snch permit- Permit, (a) where in his opinion the grant of the permit would be undesirable havin5 regard to the conservation of the specks concerned; or (h) where he is not satisfied that any item to which the permit relates has been lawfully acquired. (2) Where for any reason the grant of a game and trophy export permit is refused, the Chief Game and Wildlife Officer shall return the fee submitted by the applicant.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area by Andrew Cole Burton a Dissertation Submitted in Partial
    Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area By Andrew Cole Burton A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Justin S. Brashares, Chair Professor Steven R. Beissinger Professor Claire Kremen Professor William Z. Lidicker Fall 2010 Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area © 2010 by Andrew Cole Burton ABSTRACT Wildlife Monitoring and Conservation in a West African Protected Area by Andrew Cole Burton Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy and Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Justin S. Brashares, Chair Global declines in biological diversity are increasingly well documented and threaten the welfare and resilience of ecological and human communities. Despite international commitments to better assess and protect biodiversity, current monitoring effort is insufficient and conservation targets are not being met (e.g., Convention on Biological Diversity 2010 Target). Protected areas are a cornerstone of attempts to shield wildlife from anthropogenic impact, yet their effectiveness is uncertain. In this dissertation, I investigated the monitoring and conservation of wildlife (specifically carnivores and other larger mammals) within the context of a poorly studied savanna reserve in a tropical developing region: Mole National Park (MNP) in the West African nation of Ghana. I first evaluated the efficacy of the park’s long-term, patrol-based wildlife monitoring system through comparison with a camera-trap survey and an assessment of sampling error. I found that park patrol observations underrepresented MNP’s mammal community, recording only two-thirds as many species as camera traps over a common sampling period.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Mongoose
    Mungos mungo – Banded Mongoose Assessment Rationale The Banded Mongoose is listed as Least Concern as, although its distribution is restricted to the northeast of the assessment region, it is generally common in suitable habitat and is present in several protected areas. There are no major threats that could cause range-wide population decline. Accidental persecution through poisoning, controlled burning, and infectious disease may lead to local declines, whilst wildlife ranching might have a positive effect by conserving more suitable habitat and connecting subpopulations. Regional population effects: Dispersal across regional Chris & Mathilde Stuart borders is suspected as the range extends widely into Mozambique and is continuous into southeastern Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern Botswana and southern Zimbabwe, and the species is not constrained by fences. National Red List status (2004) Least Concern Reasons for change No change Distribution Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern This species is distributed widely in sub-Saharan Africa TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) None from Senegal and Gambia to Ethiopia, Eritrea and Somalia, and south to about 31° in South Africa. It has CITES listing None been recorded to 1,600 m asl. in Ethiopia (Yalden et al. Endemic No 1996). Although fairly widespread in southern Africa, M. mungo appears to be rare in West Africa. Its relative In addition to living in groups numbering tens of scarcity in West Africa may be due to niche overlap with its individuals, Banded Mongooses are plural congener, the Gambian Mongoose (M. gambianus), breeders, females giving birth synchronously, and endemic to West Africa and reported to occupy similar provide cooperative care to the communal litter of habitat and have a similar diet (Cant & Gilchrist 2013; van pups (Cant & Gilchrist 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivore CAMP 1993.Pdf
    SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Review Draft Report 1G May 1994 Edited and compiled by Roland Wirth, Angela Glatston, Onnie Byers, Susie Ellis, Pat Foster-Turley, Paul Robinson, Harry Van Rompaey, Don Moore, Ajith Kumar, Roland Melisch, and Ulysses Seal Prepared by the participants of a workshop held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands 11-14 February 1993 A Collaborative Workshop IUCN/SSC MUSTELID, VIVERRID, AND PROCYONID SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC CAPTIVE BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP Sponsored by The Rotterdam Zoo IUCN/SSC Sir Peter Scott Fund United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid, and Procyonid Specialist Group and the IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group. The Primary Sponsors of the Workshop were: The Rotterdam Zoo, IUCN/SSC Peter Scott Fund, United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group. Cover Photo: Malayan Civet, Viverra tangalunga by Roland Wirth. Wirth, R., A Glatston, 0. Byers, S. Ellis, P. Foster-Turley, P. Robinson, H. Van Rompaey, D. Moore, A Kumar, R. Melisch, U.Seal. (eds.). 1994. Small Carnivore Conservation Assessment and Management Plan. IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of this publication can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. Send checks for US $35.00 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US Bank. Funds may be wired to First Bank NA ABA No. 091000022, for credit to CBSG Account No.
    [Show full text]
  • Feliforms 21 V-6
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Feliform Sanctuaries Version: December 2019 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 4 FELIFORM STANDARDS 4 FELIFORM HOUSING 4 H-1. Types of Space and Size 4 H-2. Containment 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings 8 H-4. Transfer Doors 9 H-5. Shelter 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 10 H-7. Sanitation 12 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 13 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 15 N-1. Water 15 N-2. Diet 15 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 17 N-4. Food Storage 17 N-5. Food Handling 18 VETERINARY CARE 18 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 18 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 19 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 19 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 20 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Feliforms 21 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 22 V-7. Breeding/Contraception 23 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program 24 V-9. Euthanasia 30 WELL BEING AND HANDLING OF FELIFORMS 25 W-1. Physical Well-Being 26 W-2. Social Housing 27 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals 27 W-4. Behavioral/Psychological Well-Being 28 W-5. Feliform-Caregiver Relationships 29 W-6. Handling and Restraint 30 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries W-7. Animal Transport 37 FELIFORMS BEING RELEASED TO THE WILD 32 R-1. General Considerations 32 R-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from to Calculate Both and the Variance Inflation Factor [77,78]
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title Hierarchical multi-species modeling of carnivore responses to hunting, habitat and prey in a West African protected area. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/44j3d4mr Journal PLoS One, 7(5) Authors Burton, A Sam, Moses Balangtaa, Cletus et al. Publication Date 2012 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0038007 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Hierarchical Multi-Species Modeling of Carnivore Responses to Hunting, Habitat and Prey in a West African Protected Area A. Cole Burton1,2*, Moses K. Sam3, Cletus Balangtaa3, Justin S. Brashares1 1 Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America, 2 Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 3 Wildlife Division of the Forestry Commission of Ghana, Accra, Ghana Abstract Protected areas (PAs) are a cornerstone of global efforts to shield wildlife from anthropogenic impacts, yet their effectiveness at protecting wide-ranging species prone to human conflict – notably mammalian carnivores – is increasingly in question. An understanding of carnivore responses to human-induced and natural changes in and around PAs is critical not only to the conservation of threatened carnivore populations, but also to the effective protection of ecosystems in which they play key functional roles. However, an important challenge to assessing carnivore communities is the often infrequent and imperfect nature of survey detections. We applied a novel hierarchical multi-species occupancy model that accounted for detectability and spatial autocorrelation to data from 224 camera trap stations (sampled between October 2006 and January 2009) in order to test hypotheses about extrinsic influences on carnivore community dynamics in a West African protected area (Mole National Park, Ghana).
    [Show full text]
  • Annex C-1 Flora and Fauna Species in Study Area
    A N N E X C SUPLEMENTALSUPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT SECTION ANNEX C-1 FLORA AND FAUNA SPECIES IN STUDY AREA Annex C1 – Flora and Fauna Species in Study Area C1 - 1 Table C1-1 Large Mammals Recorded during Baseline Studies Conducted in Akyem Study Area within Ajenjua Bepo Forest Reserve, Mamang River Forest Reserve, and Outside Forest Reserves (FR) SGS SGS CI CI GWS Ajenjua Mamang Outside Species 1998 2004 2005 2006 2007 Bepo FR FR FRs Order Artiodactyla Cephalophus maxwelli + + + + + + + (Maxwell’s duiker) Cephalophus niger (Black + + + + + + duiker) Cephalophus niger (Bay duiker) + + Potomochoerus porcus (Red + + + river hog) Neotragus pygmaeus (Royal + + + + + + + duiker) Boocerus euryceros (Bongo) + + Tragelaphus scriptus + + + + + + + + (Bushbuck) Order Primate Galagoides demidovi (Bushbaby) + + + + + Galago senegalensis (Bosman’s + + + + + + + potto) Perodictus potto (Potto) + + + Cercopithicus diana (Diana + + monkey) Cercopithicus petaurista + + + + + + + (Spot-nosed monkey) Cercopithicus mona (Mona + + + + + + monkey) Cercopithicus nicitans (Putty + + + nosed monkey) Colobus polykomos (Black and + white colobus monkey) Procolobus verus (Olive colobus) + + Order Pholidota Manis longicaudatus (Long- + + + + + + + tailed pangolin) Manis tricuspis + + + + (White-tailed pangolin) Order Carnivora Civettictis civette (African civet) + + + + + + + + Genetta maculate (Forest + + genet) Helogale parvula (Dwarf + + + + + mongoose) Nandinia binotata (Palm civet) + + + + + Atilax paludinosus (Marsh + + mongoose) Mungos
    [Show full text]
  • Banded Mongoose • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Mungos Mungo
    Banded Mongoose • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Mungos mungo through human understanding Classification What groups does this organism belong to based on characteristics shared with other organisms? Class: Mammalia (all mammals) Order: Carnivora (carnivores) Family: Herpestidae (mongoose and meerkats) Genus: Mungos (Gambian mongoose and banded mongoose) Species: mungo (banded mongoose) Distribution Where in the world does this species live? Banded mongooses live in Africa and might be found anywhere from Gambia to northeast Ethiopia and south to the border of South Africa. Habitat What kinds of areas does this species live in? Banded mongoose can be found in a variety of habitats, including savannas, forest, shrubland and grasslands. Physical Description How would this animal’s body shape and size be described? • Typically, a banded mongoose weighs from three-and-a-half to five pounds (1.59-2.27 kg). • They have brownish-gray fur with dark brown stripes on the back of its body, which ranges from 12 to 16 inches (30.4-38.1 cm) long. • The face is long with small rounded ears. It has short legs. • This species has an 8 inch (20.3 cm) bushy tail that tapers to a black tip. Diet What does this species eat? In their historic range: Mongooses are opportunistic feeders and eat mostly insects and a variety of other invertebrates. Small mammals, reptiles and birds are occasionally in their diet. They will also eat eggs and sometimes fruits. At the zoo: They are fed a variety of fruits and vegetables, ground meat, crickets, wax worms, earthworms and mealworms. Predators What eats this species? Jackals, leopards, lions, cheetah, large snakes, African wild dogs, birds of prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
    United Nations Environment Programme V Programme des Nations Unies pour l'environnement ... _ Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) Proceedings of the Third Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Geneva, Switzerland: 9 - 13 September 1991 Addendum : National reports on the implementation of the Convention and opening statements Convention stir la conservation des espèces migratrices appartenant a la faune sauvage (CMS) Compte rendu de la troisième session de la Conference des Parties Genève, Suisse: 9 - 13 septembre 1991 Additif: Rapports nationaux sur l'application de la Convention et declarations liminaires Convención sobre la conservación de las especies migratorias de animales silvestres (CMS) Actas de la tercera reunion de la Conferencia de las Partes Ginebra, Suiza: 9 a 13 de septiembre de 1991 Suplemento : Informes nacionales sobre la aplicaciOn de la ConvenciOn y declaraciones inaugurales Secretariat of the Convention Secretariat de la Convention Secretarla de la Convención Bonn, Germany Bonn, Allemagne Bonn, Alemania I' Paper bleached without chlorine Papier blanchi sans adjonction de Papel blanqueado sin cloro or chlorine compounds. Made chlore ou de dérivés du chlore. derivados del cloro. Producido from reject woodchips from saw Fait a partir de copeaux et de madera de desecho forestal mills and forest,y thinnings. bois d'éclaircissement de foret. aserraderos. Sin blanqueantes Without brightening additives. Sans azurant optique. ópticos.
    [Show full text]
  • Ebook Download Seals and Sea Lions Ebook
    SEALS AND SEA LIONS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Crossingham,Bobbie Kalman | 32 pages | 28 Feb 2006 | Crabtree Publishing Co,Canada | 9780778713234 | English | New York, Canada Seals and sea lions - CodyCross Answers Cheats and Solutions In one legend, seals, whales and other marine mammals were formed from her severed fingers. The Greeks associated them with both the sea and sun and were considered to be under the protection of the gods Poseidon and Apollo. Pinnipeds can be found in facilities around the world, as their large size and playfulness make them popular attractions. Zoologist Georges Cuvier noted during the 19th century that wild seals show considerable fondness for humans and stated that they are second only to some monkeys among wild animals in their easily tamability. Francis Galton noted in his landmark paper on domestication that seals were a spectacular example of an animal that would most likely never be domesticated despite their friendliness and desire for comfort due to the fact that they serve no practical use for humans. Some modern exhibits have rocky backgrounds with artificial haul-out sites and a pool, while others have pens with small rocky, elevated shelters where the animals can dive into their pools. More elaborate exhibits contain deep pools that can be viewed underwater with rock-mimicking cement as haul-out areas. The most common pinniped species kept in captivity is the California sea lion as it is both easy to train and adaptable. Other species popularly kept include the grey seal and harbor seal. Larger animals like walruses and Steller sea lions are much less common.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Feliform Sanctuaries Version: June, 2013 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 4 FELIFORM STANDARDS 4 FELIFORM HOUSING 4 H-1. Types of Space and Size 4 H-2. Containment 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings 8 H-4. Transfer Doors 9 H-5. Shelter 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 12 H-7. Sanitation 13 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 14 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION 16 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities 16 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing 16 PF-3. Life Support 16 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling 16 PF-5. Security: Feliform Enclosures 17 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance 18 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring 18 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control 19 PF-9. Record Keeping 19 PF-10. Animal Transport 20 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 21 N-1. Water 21 N-2. Diet 21 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 23 N-4. Food Storage 23 N-5. Food Handling 24 VETERINARY CARE 24 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 24 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 25 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 25 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 26 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Feliforms 27 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 28 V-7. Breeding/Contraception 29 V-8.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Conservation Status of Large Mammals in Sime Darby Oil Palm Concession in Liberia
    G.J.B.A.H.S.,Vol.2(3):93-102 (July – September, 2013) ISSN: 2319 – 5584 CURRENT CONSERVATION STATUS OF LARGE MAMMALS IN SIME DARBY OIL PALM CONCESSION IN LIBERIA Jean-Claude Koffi BENE1, Eloi Anderson BITTY2, Kouakou Hilaire BOHOUSSOU3, Michael ABEDI- LARTEY4, Joel GAMYS5 & Prince A. J. SORIBAH6 1UFR Environnement, Université Jean Lorougnon Guédé; BP 150 Daloa. 2Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques en Côte d’Ivoire ; 01 BP 1303 Abidjan 01. 3Laboratoire de Zoologie et Biologie Animale, UFR Biosciences, Université de Cocody; 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22. 4University of Konstanz, Schlossallee 2, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany. 5Frend of Ecosystems and Environment-Liberia. 6CARE Building, Congo Town, Monrovia. Abstract The forest ecosystem of Liberia is part from the Upper Guinea Eco-region, and harbors an exceptional biodiversity in a rich mosaic of habitats serving as refuge for numerous endemic species. Unfortunately, many of these forests have been lost rapidly over the past decades, and the remaining are under various forms of anthropogenic pressure, subsistence farming, and large-scale industrial agriculture and mining. As part of a broader survey to generate information for conservation management strategies in the Gross Concession Area in preparation for its oil palm and rubber plantations in western Liberia, Sime Darby (Liberia) Inc., commissioned surveys on large mammals species in 2011. Through a combination of hunter interviews and foot surveys, we documented evidence of 46 and 32, respectively, of large mammals in the area. Fourteen of the confirmed species are fully protected at national level and three are partially protected. At the international level, 15 species are of conservation concern, including Zebra and Jentink’s duiker, Diana monkey, Sooty mangabey, Olive colobus, Elephant and Leopard.
    [Show full text]