DOCSLIB.ORG

Innovative Suburb-To-Suburb Transit Practices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Innovative Suburb-To-Suburb Transit Practices T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 14 Innovative Suburb-to-Suburb Transit Practices A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS ROD J. DIRIDON International Institute for Surface Chair: LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Director, Port Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Transportation Policy Study Vice Chair: JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, Director, California Department of Transportation Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council MEMBERS SHARON D. BANKS AC Transit MEMBERS LEE BARNES Barwood, Inc EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chairman & President, Arnold Industries, Inc GERALD L. BLAIR SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, Oakland, California Indiana County Transit Authority BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Burton Center for Development Studies, MICHAEL BOLTON University of Texas at Dallas Capital Metro DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Department of Transportation SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser I Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin New Jersey Transit Corporation WILLIAM F. BUNDY, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation SANDRA DRAGGOO DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy CATA A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN, Vice President, Freight Policy, American TruckingAssociations, Inc LOUIS J. GAMBACCINI (Past Chair 1993) SEPTA RAY W. CLOUGH, Nishkian Professor of Structural Engineering, Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley DELON HAMPTON JAMES C. DELONG, Director of Aviation, Denver International Airport Delon Hampton & Associates JAMES N. DENN, Commissioner, Minnesota Department of Transportation RICHARD R. KELLY DENNIS J. FITZGERALD, Executive Director, Capital District Transportation Authority Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp JAMES A. HAGEN, Chairman & CEO, CONRAIL ALAN F. KIEPPER DELON HAMPTON, Chairman and CEO, Delon Hampton & Associates New York City Transit Authority LESTER A. HOEL, Hamilton Professor, University of Virginia, Department of Civil Engineering EDWARD N. KRAVITZ DON C. KELLY, Secretary, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet The Flxible Corporation ROBERT KOCHANOWSKI, Executive Director, Southwestern Pennsylvania Regional Planning Commission PAUL LARROUSSE JAMES L. LAMMIE, President & CEO, Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc Madison Metro Transit System CHARLES P. O'LEARY, JR, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Transportation ROBERT G. LINGWOOD JUDE W. P. PATIN, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development BC Transit CRAIG E. PHILIP, President, Ingram Barge Company GORDON J. LINTON DARREL RENSINK, Director, Iowa Department of Transportation FTA JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN, JR East Professor and Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering, MIT (Past WILLIAM W. MILLAR Chair 1994) Port Authority of Allegheny County MARTIN WACHS, Director, Institute of Transportation Studies, Department of Urban Planning, University of MIKE MOBEY California, Los Angeles Isabella County Transportation Comm DAVID N. WORMLEY, Dean of Engineering, Pennsylvania State University DON S. MONROE HOWARD YERUSALIM, Vice President, KCI Technologies, Inc Pierce Transit PATRICIA S. NETTLESHIP The Nettleship Group, Inc MIKE ACOTT, President, National Asphalt Pavement Association (ex officio) ROBERT E. PAASWELL ROY A. ALLEN, Vice President, Research and Test Department, Association of American Railroads (ex The City College of New York officio) JAMES P. REICHERT ANDREW H. CARD, JR., President &CEO, American Automobile Manufacturers Association (ex officio) Reichert Management Services THOMAS J. DONOHUE, President and CEO, American Trucking Associations ( ex officio) LAWRENCE G. REUTER FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS, Executive Director, American Association of State Highway and Transportation WMATA Officials (ex officio) MICHAEL S. TOWNES JACK R. GILSTRAP, Executive Vice President, American Public Transit Association (ex officio) Peninsula Transportation Dist Comm ALBERT J. HERBERGER, Maritime Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FRANK J. WILSON DAVID R. HINSON, Federal Aviation Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) New Jersey DOT T. R. LAKSHMANAN, Director, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex EDWARD WYTKIND officio) AFL-CIO GORDON J. LINTON, Federal Transit Administrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) RICARDO MARTINEZ Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (ex officio) EX OFFICIO MEMBERS JOLENE M. MOLITORIS, Federal RailroadAdministrator, U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) JACK R. GILSTRAP DHARMENDRA K. (DAVE) SHARMA, Administrator, Research & Special Programs Administration, U.S. APTA Department of Transportation (ex officio) RODNEY E. SLATER RODNEY E. SLATER, Federal Highway Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation (ex officio) FHWA ARTHUR E. WILLIAMS, Chief of Engineers and Commander, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ex officio) FRANCIS B. FRANCOIS AASHTO ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TRB Transportation Research Board Executive Committee Subcommittee for TCRP TDC EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR LILLIAN C. BORRONE, Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (Chair) FRANK J. CIHAK SHARON D. BANKS, AC Transit APTA LESTER A. HOEL, University of Virginia GORDON J. LINTON, US Department of Transportation SECRETARY ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board ROBERT J. REILLY JOSEPH M. SUSSMAN, Massachusetts Institute of Technology TRB JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, California Department of Transportation T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M Synthesis of Transit Practice 14 Innovative Suburb-to-Suburb Transit Practices KATHERINE S. HOOPER Falmouth, Maine TOPIC PANEL PAMELA J. BELCHAMBER, Vallejo Transit WAYNE BERMAN, Federal Highway Administration DAVID F. BONE, Montgomery County Division of Transit Services TERRANCE BRANNON, PACE Suburban Bus Division of the RTA JOSEPH M. GOODMAN, Federal Transit Administration ALAN E.PISARSKI, Falls Church, Virginia LAUREL J. RADOW, American Public Transit Association DANIEL RUDGE, University of South Florida JAMES A. SCOTT, Transportation Research Board FRANK SPIELBERG, SG Associates, Inc JON WILLIAMS, Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Research Board National Research Council Research Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in Cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1995 TRANSIT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH PROGRAM TCRP SYNTHESIS 14 Project SB-2 The nation's growth and the need to meet mobility, ISSN 1073-4880 environmental, and energy objectives place demands on public ISBN 0-309-05862-7 transit systems. Current systems, some of which are old and in need Library of Congress Catalog Card No 95-61367 of upgrading, must expand service area, increase service frequency, and improve efficiency to serve these demands. Research is Price $14.00 necessary to solve operating problems, to adapt appropriate new technologies from other industries, and to introduce innovations into the transit industry. The Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) serves as one of the principal means by which the transit industry can develop innovative near-term solutions to meet demands NOTICE placed on it. The need for TCRP was originally identified in TRB Special The project that is the subject of this report was a part of the Transit Report 213--Research for Public Transit. New Directions, published Cooperative Research Program conducted by the Transportation in 1987 and based on a study sponsored by the Federal Transit Research Board with the approval of the Governing Board of the Administration (FTA) A report by the American Public Transit National Research Council. Such approval reflects the Governing Association (APTA), Transportation 2000, also recognized the need Board' s judgment that the project concerned is appropriate with for local, problem-solving research TCRP, modeled after the respect to both the purposes and resources of the National Research longstanding and successful National Cooperative Highway Research Council. Program, undertakes research and other technical activities in The members of the technical advisory panel selected to response to the needs of transit service providers. The scope of vice monitor this project and to review this report were chosen for configuration, equipment, facilities, operations, human resources, recognized scholarly competence and with due consideration for the maintenance, policy, and administrative practices. balance of disciplines appropriate to the project. The opinions and TCRP was established under FTA sponsorship in July 1992. conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency Proposed by the U.S Department of Transportation, TCRP was that performed the research, and while they have been accepted as authorized as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation appropriate by the technical panel, they are not necessarily those of Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA). On May 13, 1992, a memorandum the Transportation Research Board, the Transit Development agreement outlining TCRP operating procedures was executed by the Corporation, the National Research Council, or the Federal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fuori Le Mura: the Productive Compartmentaliztion of the Megalopolis
    Fuori le Mura: The productive compartmentaliztion of the megalopolis Joshua Stein Woodbury University Fuori le Mura is a radical speculative proposal provoking inquiry into right- sizing the contemporary megalopolis. Through a size comparison of vari- ous urban configurations with strictly defined perimeter boundaries, from the Italian city-state to the urban growth boundaries exemplified in con- temporary cities like Portland, OR, a cohesive urban identity and scale is The Walled City defined. Could “walled” mega-enclaves (scaled to match the ideal city size Medieval Siena’s wall operates as more than a simple fortification against the outside of Portland) create manageable urban nodes with a territory of free experi- world. Instead it fosters a complex negotiation between the extra-urban activities still very much networked to those inside the walls. mentation replacing suburbia. Fuori le Mura—Outside the Walls—is a proposal for Los Angeles that draws a dividing line between two complementary modes of living, rein- stating the historical concept of Urbs vs. Rure. No longer prolonging the corrosive dynamic between City and Suburb, where the suburb is simul- taneously culturally subservient to the city and parasitic in its consump- tion of resources, Fuori le Mura instead proposes two different modes of sustainable development and resource management that operate in par- allel. Outside the walls the ultimate fantasy of “no government” prevails— the obvious repercussions being the lack of infrastructure or utilities. The only dictates outside the walls are proscriptive: no impact/no emissions. Beyond this anything is possible. Within the walls infrastructure and utili- ties are heavily regulated, providing inhabitants with easy, prescriptive models for sustainable living.
    [Show full text]
  • Park-And-Ride Study: Inventory, Use, and Need
    Park-and-Ride Study: Inventory, Use, and Need For the Roanoke and New River Valley regions Contents Background ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Study Area ................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 3 Existing Facilities ............................................................................................................................. 4 Performance Measures ................................................................................................................... 9 Connectivity ................................................................................................................................ 9 Capacity ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Access ........................................................................................................................................ 12 General Conditions ................................................................................................................... 13 Education .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Hub's Metropolis: a Glimpse Into Greater Boston's Development
    James C. O’Connell, “The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 42, No. 1 (Winter 2014). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.wsc.ma.edu/mhj. 26 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Winter 2014 Published by The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 7x9 hardcover, 326 pp., $34.95. To order visit http://mitpress.mit.edu/books/hubs-metropolis 27 EDITor’s choicE The Hub’s Metropolis: A Glimpse into Greater Boston’s Development JAMES C. O’CONNELL Editor’s Introduction: Our Editor’s Choice selection for this issue is excerpted from the book, The Hub’s Metropolis: Greater Boston’s Development from Railroad Suburbs to Smart Growth (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013). All who live in Massachusetts are familiar with the compact city of Boston, yet the history of the larger, sprawling metropolitan area has rarely been approached as a comprehensive whole. As one reviewer writes, “Comprehensive and readable, James O’Connell’s account takes care to orient the reader in what is often a disorienting landscape.” Another describes the book as a “riveting history of one of the nation’s most livable places—and a roadmap for how to keep it that way.” James O’Connell, the author, is intimately familiar with his topic through his work as a planner at the National Park Service, Northeast Region, in Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Towns
    24 Satellite Towns Introduction 'Satellite town' was a term used in the year immediately after the World War I as an alternative to Garden City. It subsequently developed a much wider meaning to include any town that is closely related to or dependent on a larger city. The first specific usage of the word ‘satellite town’ was in 1915 by G.R. Taylor in ‘ Satellite Cities’ referring to towns around Chicago, St. Louis and other American cities where industries had escaped congestion and crafted manufacturer’s town in the surrounding area. The new town is planned and built to serve a particular local industry, or as a dormitory or overspill town for people who work in and nearby metropolis. Satellite Town, can also be defined as a town which is self contained and limited in size, built in the vicinity of a large town or city and houses and employs those who otherwise create a demand for expansion of the existing settlement, but dependent on the parent city to some extent for population and major services. A distinction is made between a consumer satellite (essentially a dormitory suburb with few facilities) and a production satellite (with a capacity for commercial, industrial and other production distinct from that of the parent town, so a new town) town or satellite city is a concept of urban planning and referring to a small or medium-sized city that is near a large metropolis, but predates that metropolis suburban expansion and is atleast partially independent from that metropolis economically. CITIES, URBANISATION AND URBAN SYSTEMS 414 Satellite and Dormitory Towns The suburb of an urban centre where due to locational advantage the residential, industrial and educational centres are developed are known as "satellite or dormitory towns." It has a benefit of providing clean environment and spacious ground for residential and industrial expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • City Against Suburb: the Culture Wars in an American Metropolis [Book Review]
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Political Science 2001 City Against Suburb: The Culture Wars in an American Metropolis [book review] Stephen J. McGovern Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/polisci_facpubs Repository Citation McGovern, Stephen. City Against Suburb: The Culture Wars in an American Metropolis, Joseph A. Rodriguez, Pacific Historical Review, 70(2): 332-334, May 2001. This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Political Science at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reviews of Books Pacific Historical Review, Vol. 70, No. 2 (May 2001), pp. 304-351 Published by: University of California Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/phr.2001.70.2.304 . Accessed: 29/03/2013 12:19 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Pacific Historical Review. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 165.82.168.47 on Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:19:39 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Reviews of Books The World That Trade Created: Society, Culture, and the World Economy, 1400 to the Present .
    [Show full text]
  • MEGALOPOLIS MEGALOPOLIS Megalopolis at Night
    3/7/2013 MEGALOPOLIS • Term used to describe any large urban Regional Landscapes of the area created by the growth toward each United States and Canada other and eventual merging of two or MEGALOPOLIS more cities. • The French geographer Jean Gottman Prof. Anthony Grande adopted the term in 1961 for the title of his ©AFG 2013 book, “Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States.” Megalopolis Megalopolis at Night When used with a capital “M”, the term denotes the almost unbroken urban Megalopolis development that extends extends over 500 from north of Boston, MA miles from the to counties south of Wash- northern fringe of ington, DC (from Portsmouth, the Boston metro Boston NH approaching Richmond, VA). area (in NH) to Washington, DC New York City metro area. With a lower case “m” the Philadelphia term is applied to any string Some people have of adjoining very large it extending to Baltimore cities. Richmond, VA. Washington Richmond 4 LANDSCAPES of Megalopolis From the beginning: SETTLEMENT Includes large cities, small towns and rural areas where most of the A place where one people reside in an urban place. person or a group of people live. Settlements are differentiated on the basis of size = number of people present spacing = distance from each other function = reason for people grouping there 6 1 3/7/2013 HIERARCHY of SETTLEMENT HIERARCHY of SETTLEMENT The smallest settlements are greatest in number As the number of settlers (people) and located relatively close to each other. They increase from the single provide residents with basic necessities. dwelling (house ) to hamlet (group The larger settlements (cities) are more complicated, offer variety of goods and services of houses) to village to town to and are located at greater distances from each city, a hierarchy of form and other.
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California
    Travel Characteristics of Transit-Oriented Development in California Hollie M. Lund, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Robert Cervero, Ph.D. Professor of City and Regional Planning University of California at Berkeley Richard W. Willson, Ph.D., AICP Professor of Urban and Regional Planning California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Final Report January 2004 Funded by Caltrans Transportation Grant—“Statewide Planning Studies”—FTA Section 5313 (b) Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Acknowledgements This study was a collaborative effort by a team of researchers, practitioners and graduate students. We would like to thank all members involved for their efforts and suggestions. Project Team Members: Hollie M. Lund, Principle Investigator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Robert Cervero, Research Collaborator (University of California at Berkeley) Richard W. Willson, Research Collaborator (California State Polytechnic University, Pomona) Marian Lee-Skowronek, Project Manager (San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit) Anthony Foster, Research Associate David Levitan, Research Associate Sally Librera, Research Associate Jody Littlehales, Research Associate Technical Advisory Committee Members: Emmanuel Mekwunye, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Val Menotti, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Planning Department Jeff Ordway, San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit, Real Estate Department Chuck Purvis, Metropolitan Transportation Commission Doug Sibley, State of California Department of Transportation, District 4 Research Firms: Corey, Canapary & Galanis, San Francisco, California MARI Hispanic Field Services, Santa Ana, California Taylor Research, San Diego, California i Travel Characteristics of TOD in California ii Travel Characteristics of TOD in California Executive Summary Rapid growth in the urbanized areas of California presents many transportation and land use challenges for local and regional policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • Located in Downtown Narberth Picturesque Suburb Environment Ideally Located Within Walking Distance to Many, Restaurants, Shops
    274 SF - Single Office 1,053 SF - 3 Private Offices, Private Bathroom 1,200 SF - 2 Private Offices, Large Open Office, Private Bathroom, Deck site 1,419 SF - 1 Private Office, Fully Furnished Open Office, Private Bathroom Located in downtown Narberth Picturesque Suburb Environment Ideally located within walking distance to many, restaurants, shops and local business Septa’s Paoli/Thorndale line located just 350 ft. away. Easily accessible to I-76, 476, the PA Turnpike and 422 Michael Willner 33 Rock Hill Road, Suite 350 Phone: (610) 658-7070 Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 E-Mail: [email protected] The Best Little Office Buildings in Narberth are located on Forrest Avenue in Narberth Borough. It encompasses a string of four historic buildings that were converted into offices. There are various sized suites available with each being unique. These offices are ideal for the entrepreneur looking to service main line residents or a larger scale operation looking for up to 2,500 SF on one floor. Parking is available but is limited due to the nature of the downtown. Narberth Borough is located within Lower Merion Township in Montgomery County. It' s on the western edge of the City of Philadelphia on the Main Line, a sequence of picturesque suburbs that extend from Philadelphia along the Pennsylvania Railroad. Montgomery Avenue runs along the borough's northern border making it easily accessible to I-76, 476, the PA Turnpike and 422. Septa' s Paoli/ Thorndale line services Narberth with a train station located in the center of Town. By utilizing the train, patrons can access center city Philadelphia within 19 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: a Literature Review
    Transit Cooperative Research Program Sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration RESEARCH RESULTS DIGEST October 2002—Number 52 Subject Area: VI Public Transit Responsible Senior Program Officer: Gwen Chisholm Transit-Oriented Development and Joint Development in the United States: A Literature Review This digest summarizes the literature review of TCRP Project H-27, “Transit-Oriented Development: State of the Practice and Future Benefits.” This digest provides definitions of transit-oriented development (TOD) and transit joint development (TJD), describes the institutional issues related to TOD and TJD, and provides examples of the impacts and benefits of TOD and TJD. References and an annotated bibliography are included. This digest was written by Robert Cervero, Christopher Ferrell, and Steven Murphy, from the Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. CONTENTS IV.2 Supportive Public Policies: Finance and Tax Policies, 46 I INTRODUCTION, 2 IV.3 Supportive Public Policies: Land-Based I.1 Defining Transit-Oriented Development, 5 Initiatives, 54 I.2 Defining Transit Joint Development, 7 IV.4 Supportive Public Policies: Zoning and I.3 Literature Review, 9 Regulations, 57 IV.5 Supportive Public Policies: Complementary II INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES, 10 Infrastructure, 61 II.1 The Need for Collaboration, 10 IV.6 Supportive Public Policies: Procedural and II.2 Collaboration and Partnerships, 12 Programmatic Approaches, 61 II.3 Community Outreach, 12 IV.7 Use of Value Capture, 66 II.4 Government Roles, 14
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting Include the New UW Research Park on Into Dane County Represented About a 33% Madison’S West Side, the Greentech Village Increase Compared to 2000
    transit, particularly if developed with higher Around 40,000 workers commute into densities, mixed-uses, and pedestrian- Dane County from seven adjacent friendly designs. While most of the existing counties, according to 2006-2008 American peripheral centers have not been designed Community Survey (ACS) data. Of these, in this fashion, plans for many of the new about 22,600 commuted to the city of centers are more transit-supportive. These Madison. The number of workers commuting include the new UW Research Park on into Dane County represented about a 33% Madison’s west side, the GreenTech Village increase compared to 2000. While the 2006- and McGaw Neighborhood areas in the City 2008 and 2000 data sources aren’t directly of Fitchburg, and the Westside Neighborhood comparable, the numbers are consistent on the City of Sun Prairie’s southwest side. with past trends from decennial Census data. “Reverse commuting” from Dane Figure 6 shows the existing and planned County to adjacent counties did not show future major employment/activity centers the same increase. Around 8,400 commuted along with their projected 2035 employment. to adjacent counties, about the same as in The map illustrates the natural east-west 2000. Figure 7 shows work trip commuting to corridor that exists, within which future high- and from Dane County. capacity rapid transit service could connect many of these centers. Around 62,600 workers commuted to the city of Madison from other Dane County Commuting – Where We Work and communities in 2009, according to U.S. Census Longitudinal Employer-Household How We Get There Dynamics (LEHD) program data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Urban-Suburban Interaction on Urbanization and Suburban Ecological Security: a Case Study of Suburban Wuhan, Centr
    sustainability Article The Effect of Urban-Suburban Interaction on Urbanization and Suburban Ecological Security: A Case Study of Suburban Wuhan, Central China Yasi Tian * and Lei Wang Urban and rural planning, School of Architecture, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-159-7208-3952 Received: 28 January 2020; Accepted: 18 February 2020; Published: 20 February 2020 Abstract: In developing countries like China, urbanization is still occurring at a rapid pace. During urbanization, the urban land expands drastically, which makes suburbs the most affected area facing urban expansion. The land transition has proven to threaten the function and security of ecosystems, and therefore the topics of suburban land transition and ecological security have raised much attention. However, the urban-suburban interaction, which is one of the basic characteristics of suburbs, has been insufficiently considered. The urban-suburban interaction is developed based on the flows of people, materials, and information between urban and suburban areas, and it essentially reveals the relationship between human activities and land-use optimization. To fill the research gap, this study adopts a case study of Wuhan city, and first quantifies the urban-suburban interactions from a symbiotic perspective, and investigates rural residents and public buses to verify the estimated interactions. The results show that there is obvious heterogeneity in urban-suburban interactions in different suburban towns. Correlation analysis and geographic weight regression are then applied to demonstrate the relationship between the urban-suburban interaction and urbanization in the suburbs. Additionally, urbanization potential in the suburbs is estimated. Then, a suburban ecological security assessment is conducted by a “pressure-status-response” (PSR) model, and the urbanization potential that is estimated based on urban-suburban interaction is integrated as a “pressure” indicator.
    [Show full text]
  • What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure Or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods?
    Journal of Transport Geography 13 (2005) 83–99 www.elsevier.com/locate/jtrangeo What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Tim Schwanen a,*, Patricia L. Mokhtarian b a Urban and Regional Research Center Utrecht (URU), Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80.115, 3508TC Utrecht, The Netherlands b Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Institute of Transportation Studies, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis CA 95616, USA Abstract The academic literature on the impact of urban form on travel behavior has increasingly recognized that residential location choice and travel choices may be interconnected. We contribute to the understanding of this interrelation by studying to what extent commute mode choice differs by residential neighborhood and by neighborhood type dissonance—the mismatch between a com- muterÕs current neighborhood type and her preferences regarding physical attributes of the residential neighborhood. Using data from the San Francisco Bay Area, we find that neighborhood type dissonance is statistically significantly associated with commute mode choice: dissonant urban residents are more likely to commute by private vehicle than consonant urbanites but not quite as likely as true suburbanites. However, differences between neighborhoods tend to be larger than between consonant and dissonant residents within a neighborhood. Physical neighborhood structure thus appears to have an autonomous impact on commute mode choice. The analysis also shows that the impact of neighborhood type dissonance interacts with that of commutersÕ beliefs about automobile use, suggesting that these are to be reckoned with when studying the joint choices of residential location and commute mode.
    [Show full text]