DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3 Answer Keys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 3 Answer Keys Chapter 3 Reading Quiz Answer Key 1. What is the best description of the Hedonic Treadmill? A. You are running very fast and you actually enjoy it B. You are stuck repeating things in your life, like a job or chores, and you do not like them C. You are increasingly happy the more you work D. CORRECT: You are convinced the next desire you have will finally make you happy, then you reach it only to crave something else. - For example, you get that cheesesteak and fries, but once you eat it, you don’t feel great and are maybe already looking forward to what your next meal will be. This is normal and okay, but we don’t want our lives to revolve around seeking out these simple pleasures. 2. What is the best definition of “hedonism?” A. Excitement from exercise of either your mind or body B. The belief that valuing your mind or “head” is most important C. The pursuit of very meaningful pleasures, like helping the world or taking care of sick loved ones D. CORRECT: The pursuit of simple pleasures 3. Which of the following is an example of “hedonism?” I. Going out to dinner II. Playing video games III. Hanging out with a group of friends IV. Having a job that makes a big difference in the world A. I only B. I and II C. CORRECT: I, II and III – These are all temporary forms of happiness, which is hedonism. Have a job that makes a big difference in the world would be an example of your eudaimonia. D. I, II, III and IV 4. Which of the following statements is true about your brain? I. Anytime you feel “happy,” such as eating a tasty piece of food, your brain releases chemicals called serotonin and dopamine. It’s those chemicals that make you feel happy. II. Hedonism is always bad. Anytime your brain starts to recognize happiness from hedonism, your physical body starts to get a little sicker. A. CORRECT: I only – Hedonism is not always bad. We all pursue it and that’s okay, but we need to make sure that’s not all we focus on. We must also strive to find our purpose in life and what will give us long lasting happiness. B. II only C. Both I and II D. Neither I nor II 5. What statement best summarizes the premise that “wealth and well-being work together?” A. Money will always make you happy. – NOT TRUE – THERE ARE PLENTY OF FOLKS WHO HAVE A LOT OF MONEY BUT ARE NOT HAPPY. B. Being wealthier is worse than being rich, and when you are rich you also tend to be physically healthier. C. Hedonism should always be avoided at all costs. You should always strive to live a life full of purpose. D. CORRECT: Money will not guarantee everyday will be great, but it will help you have an increasing amount of better and better days. – There is no way to guarantee you’ll be happy each day, but you can be sure that you’ll have more happy days if you’re wealthy because you won’t have to worry about meeting your basic needs all the time. Chapter 3 YouTube Video Quiz Answer Key 1. How old is the Big Bang? A. CORRECT: 13.8 billion years B. 5 billion years C. 500 million years D. 5,000 years 2. How old is writing? A. 13.8 billion years B. 5 billion years C. 500 million years D. CORRECT: 5,000 years 3. What do we call the consistent improvement in the quality of human life over long periods of time? A. Writing B. Find Your Niche C. Wealth and Well-Being Work Together D. CORRECT: The Optimistic Universe 4. Where is the earliest known records of the first humans? A. CORRECT: Ethiopia B. Greece C. Rome D. China 5. What is interesting to Mr. LaSalle about the idea of hedonism and eudaimonia? A. Only the Greeks came up with this or any similar idea. B. Even though it may go by different names, these two forms of happiness were developed by Jews, Christians, and Muslims at the exact same time. C. CORRECT: Even though it may go by different names, these two forms of happiness were invented by different thinkers and civilizations very close in time from one another. – How cool is that?! D. Eudaimonia is the only good form of happiness and hedonism is a terrible form of happiness. 6. What refers to happiness we get from simple pleasures? A. CORRECT: Hedonism B. Eudaimonia C. Both (A) and (B) D. Neither (A) nor (B) 7. What refers to happiness we get from discovering our purpose or potential? A. Hedonism B. CORRECT: Eudaimonia C. Both (A) and (B) D. Neither (A) nor (B) 8. Wealth or money helps you achieve what type of happiness? A. Hedonism B. Eudaimonia C. CORRECT: Both (A) and (B) D. Neither (A) nor (B) 9. What is true when you “find or create your niche?” I. You will only have happy days in the future II. All of your different identities are in balance A. I only B. CORRECT: II only – You won’t necessarily have only happy days in the future but you’ll have a lot more happy days than you would if you didn’t find your niche. C. Both I and II D. Neither I nor II 10. “Find or create your niche” is similar to what other idea? A. The Optimistic Universe B. Invest and diversify C. CORRECT: Wealth and well-being work together – Finding your niche will likely lead to wealth which will lead to more happy days. D. Hedonism Chapter 3 Friday Summative Quiz Answer Key 1. Which description best represents the “Hedonic Treadmill?” A. Humans can only achieve the greatest happiness by chasing after specific goals, similar to being on a treadmill. B. The source of unhappiness and misery comes when we pursue goals without reaching them, similar to how a treadmill uses energy without getting the runner any closer to any destination. C. The key to happiness is to motivate others to do the exhausting work that they find meaningful but you do not. D. CORRECT: Humans think achieving or obtaining will lead to happiness but humans find themselves wanting more and more without getting much happier. – We are never satisfied with simple pleasures – we always want more. In other words, we’re always chasing (like on a treadmill) that next thing that will make us temporarily happy. 2. Which of the following is the best summary of the “Hedonic Helmet?” A. Real technology that now exists that can measure a person’s potential to earn money. B. The greatest scam in recent human history where normal Americans wasted thousands of dollars on something that did not make anyone happier. C. A theoretical idea that Einstein thought up, which then motivated millions of dollars in government investment that led to new inventions never dreamed up before. D. CORRECT: An imaginary experiment that asks someone if they would spend their time feeling instant happiness by plugging it in. – Would you do it? Probably not. No one wants to be happy every second of every day with no effort. 3. What was Mr. LaSalle’s purpose in writing about the Hedonic Helmet? A. CORRECT: To force the reader to realize that there is more to happiness than the pursuit of simple pleasures – it’s easy to think that’s what life is all about, but we would all agree it’s about more than the simple pleasures. B. To force the reader to realize that money cannot buy happiness C. To force the reader to realize that technology is changing the world, and has been, in better and better ways for thousands of years D. To force the reader to recognize that science and innovation can destroy civilization 4. What is the best way to describe the difference between hedonism versus eudaimonia? A. Hedonism is the pursuit of money and eudaimonia is the pursuit of value B. Eudaimonia is the pursuit of money and hedonism is the pursuit of value C. CORRECT: Hedonism is the pursuit of simple pleasures and eudaimonia is the pursuit of discovering your purpose in life D. Eudaimonia is the pursuit of simple pleasure and hedonism is the pursuit of simple pleasure in life 5. What does Mr. LaSalle mean by “value wealth and well-being?” A. Happiness comes before earning money B. Earning money comes before happiness C. CORRECT: Money that does not run-out allows people to achieve the goals that lead to happiness – if you don’t have to worry about your basic needs because you have wealth, you’ll have many more happy days. D. The more money a person has, the happier the person will be 6. A metaphor or analogy is used throughout the chapter about a “yo-yo going up a hill.” Obviously, no one in this class is going to receive a yo-yo or be asked to walk up a hill. What was Mr. LaSalle’s purpose in introducing the idea of a “yo-yo going up a hill?” A. The yo-yo represents the focus, discipline and perseverance necessary to achieve wealth. The hill represents challenges. B. Gravity on the yo-yo symbolizes how poverty weighs us down, and the mountain is time. C. CORRECT: A yo-yo represents your mood or level of happiness, and walking up a hill with a yo-yo represents how wealth leads to a gradual improvement in happiness as we get older.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeremy Bentham, Werner Stark, and 'The Psychology of Economic Man'
    Jeremy Bentham, ‘The Psychology of Economic Man’, and Behavioural Economics Michael Quinn (Bentham Project, UCL. [email protected]) Résumés English Francais § 1 briefly reviews first the received interpretation of Bentham, which sees him as having had little to do with the development of economics (excepting some passing mentions which recognize his deployment of the concept of utility or his reduction of human motivation to self-interest, and perhaps a note on his discussion of the concept of diminishing marginal utility); and second, the manner in which he applies his concept of rationality to political economy. In § 2, the central thesis of the paper is presented: it is argued that an examination of his insights into the psychology of individual choice supplies good reasons to identify him as an intellectual godfather of behavioural economics. In keeping with the normativity of his concept of rationality, Bentham would maintain that the way in which traditional economics continues to ignore the gulf between its model of human decision-making and the facts of human psychology weakens its usefulness both as a science and as a guide to public policy. Bentham anticipated several modifications to the standard model (for instance loss- aversion, the endowment effect, reference dependence, framing, the desire for cognitive ease, and status-quo bias) which have been introduced later by behavioural economics. § 3 introduces two problems concerning the normativity of economics, the first of which, at least for Bentham, rests upon a false premise,
    [Show full text]
  • Foundational Frameworks of Positive Psychology: Mapping Well-Being Orientations
    Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne © 2015 Canadian Psychological Association 2015, Vol. 56, No. 3, 311–321 0708-5591/15/$12.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/cap0000033 Foundational Frameworks of Positive Psychology: Mapping Well-Being Orientations Louise Lambert Holli-Anne Passmore and Mark D. Holder Canadian University of Dubai University of British Columbia The scientific study of well-being has been strongly influenced by ideas from a number of related fields, including different areas of psychology. Two major philosophical traditions—hedonia and eudaimonia— underscore much of our current understanding of well-being, and are reflected across early and contemporary psychological theories of well-being. These traditions help delineate the various concep- tualisations of well-being and its components; moreover, these traditions influence which research questions are asked, and where and how answers are sought. This has resulted in a plethora of categories and terms referring to similar, yet distinct, concepts such as: well-being, happiness, optimal or positive experiences, life satisfaction, and flourishing. Given the difficulties of distinguishing these concepts, this article aims to provide clarity by delineating the major orientations in positive psychology. We provide a “road-map” to theories and models of well-being found within positive psychology, thereby providing a starting a point from which an integrative framework of theories and models of well-being can be developed. To that end, also included in this review is a selection of well-being models that lie beyond the traditional frameworks. We conclude with a consideration of several criticisms that have been directed at positive psychology, and provide recommendations for future directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedonic Treadmill———419
    H-Baumeister (Encyc)-45348.qxd 7/24/2007 6:16 PM Page 419 Hedonic Treadmill———419 life-span perspective, from the time of conception report themselves as being much happier than other (How do prenatal stressors influence birth outcomes?) people, and those who were paralyzed in an accident to the end of life (How can clinicians help people die do not report themselves as being much less happy. with dignity?). Others are now discovering how cul- Similarly, as nations get wealthier, the reported well- tural and gender differences in lifestyles, stress reac- being of its citizens does not increase. tivity, and coping can influence health outcomes. As The lack of evidence for a relation between objec- the population ages and many develop chronic dis- tive circumstances and reported well-being has given eases, it will be increasingly important to focus on rise to the concept of a hedonic treadmill, on which health promotion and how to help individuals cope humans’ happiness remains stationary, despite efforts with their diagnoses and improve their quality of life. or interventions to advance it. The metaphor is also As the biopsychosocial model gains acceptance in interpreted to mean that humans’ happiness will decline the medical community, health psychologists have if their material circumstances remain constant. increasingly important roles to play on interdiscipli- The hedonic treadmill metaphor draws support nary teams of health care providers. Health psycholo- from adaptation in other domains. Pleasant smells gists have the potential to have a dramatic impact on usually become less intense (and less pleasurable) the health of individuals by conducting research that with continued exposure, and a 70° Fahrenheit room contributes knowledge of how psychosocial factors that initially feels delightful when one comes in from can influence behavioral and disease processes and by the cold ceases to confer pleasure after one has been intervening to promote health and prevent illness.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Approaches to Understanding Change in Happiness
    IZA DP No. 8131 Economic Approaches to Understanding Change in Happiness Nattavudh Powdthavee Alois Stutzer April 2014 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit Institute for the Study of Labor Economic Approaches to Understanding Change in Happiness Nattavudh Powdthavee CEP, London School of Economics, MIAESR, University of Melbourne and IZA Alois Stutzer University of Basel, CREMA and IZA Discussion Paper No. 8131 April 2014 IZA P.O. Box 7240 53072 Bonn Germany Phone: +49-228-3894-0 Fax: +49-228-3894-180 E-mail: [email protected] Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Different Positive Exercises on Hedonism and Eudaemonia Miguel Pereira Lopes* , Patricia Jardim Da Palma, Bruno Cardoso Garcia and Catarina Gomes
    Lopes et al. SpringerPlus (2016) 5:744 DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2407-y RESEARCH Open Access Training for happiness: the impacts of different positive exercises on hedonism and eudaemonia Miguel Pereira Lopes* , Patricia Jardim da Palma, Bruno Cardoso Garcia and Catarina Gomes Abstract Theoretical conceptions on happiness have generally considered two broad perspectives: hedonic enjoyment and eudaemonia. However, most research on how to improve people’s happiness has focused primarily on the enhance‑ ment of hedonic happiness. In this longitudinal experimental study we test the differential impact of two positive exercises—Best Possible Selves and the Lottery Question—on hedonic and eudaemonic happiness. The hypothesis that the practice of the Best Possible Selves exercise would increase hedonic happiness was confirmed. This effect was immediate and maintained a week after the exercise. Furthermore, this exercise also increased eudaemonic happiness. However, its effect decreased after a week. Contrary to what was expected the Lottery Question exercise decreased both eudaemonic happiness and hedonic happiness over time. We discuss implications of this study for the literature on positive psychological and behavioral interventions to increase happiness. Keywords: Hedonic enjoyment, Happiness, Eudaemonia, Experimental, Positive exercise Background These two perspectives mirror different views of Hedonic and eudaemonic happiness have been described human nature. Whereas the hedonic approach consid- with reference to the two Greek mythological entities of ers the human organism to be relatively empty and thus Dionysius and Apollo, the first mirroring an orientation malleable (Tooby and Cosmides 1992), the eudaemonic to pleasure and the second as representative of an ori- approach ascribes content to human nature and works to entation to meaning of life (Linley and Leontiev 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Freed from Desire1 Countering Consumerism with Critical Epicureanism
    Freed From Desire1 Countering Consumerism with Critical Epicureanism Master Thesis Philosophy by Robin Habbé, written under guidance of Johan Hartle ABSTRACT: Consumer society has the consumer in a tight hold; due to the cyclical nature of desire the consumer is manipulated to keep on consuming with disastrous ecological and social problems as a result. In my thesis I will elucidate the rise and the workings of contemporary consumer societies, more specifically the element of hedonism, because the organization of consumer society can be categorized as hedonistic. I will discuss hedonism and happiness as understood by Marcuse, as well as tactics for liberation from the imposed desires to consume. I will discover what room we have for emancipating the consumer by providing an alternative form of hedonism, based in Epicureanism. This thesis will show that Marcuse and Epicurus have very similar ideas as to how we should live happily, but most importantly on how to distinguish between true and false desires in order to live a more free and happy life, and to not destroy the planet while living. Keywords: Consumerism, Liberation, Hedonism, Emancipation, Epicureanism, Desire, Happiness, Marcuse, Aesthetic Revisioning, Critical Hedonism 1 This title is a reference to the 1996 dance song by Gala, a Belgian performer. The lyrics seem to be very much aligned with the teachings of Epicurus: condemning money, power and fame and the desire for them as something we should liberate ourselves from through strong beliefs. I would certainly recommend listening to them. ~ 1 ~ Introduction We live in strange times: most of the affluent inhabitants on our beautiful planet are consuming away an immense proportion of the scarce resources we have left.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedonic Treadmill Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being
    Beyond the Hedonic Treadmill Revising the Adaptation Theory of Well-Being Ed Diener University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign Richard E. Lucas Michigan State University Christie Napa Scollon Texas Christian University According to the hedonic treadmill model, good and bad of Happiness, David Myers (1992) wrote, “The point can- events temporarily affect happiness, but people quickly not be overstated: Every desirable experience—passionate adapt back to hedonic neutrality. The theory, which has love, a spiritual high, the pleasure of a new possession, the gained widespread acceptance in recent years, implies that exhilaration of success—is transitory” (p. 53). individual and societal efforts to increase happiness are In the original treadmill theory, Brickman and Camp- doomed to failure. The recent empirical work outlined here bell (1971) proposed that people briefly react to good and indicates that 5 important revisions to the treadmill model bad events, but in a short time they return to neutrality. are needed. First, individuals’ set points are not hedoni- Thus, happiness and unhappiness are merely short-lived cally neutral. Second, people have different set points, reactions to changes in people’s circumstances. People which are partly dependent on their temperaments. Third, continue to pursue happiness because they incorrectly be- a single person may have multiple happiness set points: lieve that greater happiness lies just around the corner in Different components of well-being such as pleasant emo- the next goal accomplished, the next social relationship tions, unpleasant emotions, and life satisfaction can move obtained, or the next problem solved. Because new goals in different directions. Fourth, and perhaps most impor- continually capture one’s attention, one constantly strives tant, well-being set points can change under some condi- to be happy without realizing that in the long run such tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Unpacking the Hedonic Paradox: a Dynamic Analysis of the Relationships Between Financial Capital, Social Capital and Life Satisfaction
    Ilka H. Gleibs, Thomas A. Morton, Anna Rabinovich, S. Alexander Haslam, and John F. Helliwell. Unpacking the hedonic paradox: a dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Gleibs, Ilka H., Morton, Thomas A., Rabinovich, Anna, Haslam, S. Alexander and Helliwell, John F. (2013) Unpacking the hedonic paradox: a dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction. British journal of social psychology, 52 (1). pp. 25-43. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02035.x © 2011 The British Psychological Society This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48799/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2013 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s final accepted version of the journal article. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Wealth and happiness 1 Unpacking the hedonic paradox: A dynamic analysis of the relationships between financial capital, social capital and life satisfaction Ilka H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier?
    Economics Faculty Works Economics 2-2008 The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier? James Konow Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Joseph Earley Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/econ_fac Part of the Economics Commons Recommended Citation Konow, James, and Earley, Joseph (2008). “The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier?,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 92, nos. 1-2 (February), pp. 1-33. This Article - post-print is brought to you for free and open access by the Economics at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. March 2007 The Hedonistic Paradox: Is Homo Economicus Happier? James Konow* and Joseph Earley Department of Economics Loyola Marymount University One LMU Drive, Suite 4200 Los Angeles, CA 90045 Abstract The “Hedonistic Paradox” states that homo economicus, or someone who seeks happiness for him- or herself, will not find it, but the person who helps others will. This study examines two questions in connection with happiness and generosity. First, do more generous people, as identified in dictator experiments, report on average greater happiness, or subjective well-being (SWB), as measured by responses to various questionnaires? Second, if the answer is affirmative, what is the causal relationship between generosity and happiness? We find a favorable correlation between generosity and happiness (i.e., SWB is directly related to several measures of happiness and inversely related to unhappiness) and examine various possible explanations, including that material well-being causes both happiness and generosity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Psychology and Science of Happiness: What Does the Research Say? David Dubner
    The Psychology and Science of Happiness: What Does the Research Say? David Dubner Abstract This paper surveys the scientific evidence regarding the nature of human happiness by drawing upon numerous studies in social science domains: namely psychology, but also related fields of business leadership and consulting, economics, and behavioral economics. Beginning with a definition and narrowing of the terminology, the review moves toward a brief sketch of measurement methods in the topic. Subjective well-being and happiness are then explored within the framework of psychological theories of happiness, including tension-reduction and goal attainment theories, activity and process theories, and genetic and biologic dispositional theory. Evolving views regarding hedonic adaptation as a key process underlying happiness is examined, as well as Lyubomirsky and Layous’ (2013) comprehensive model of happiness as a framework that encompasses the entire scope of psychological theories regarding happiness. Finally, the correlational evidence related to the various components of happiness is reviewed, concluding with the observation that although strong correlational evidence is linked to well-being, happiness is a concept that defies unequivocal causal attributions because it contains a complex amalgam of interrelated and bi-reciprocal variables. Defining Happiness Any serious discussion about happiness must first begin by attempting to define what we mean by the term happiness. In general, happiness can be thought of as an emotional state that reflects a high level of mental and/or emotional well-being. Current scientific perspectives typically frame happiness as a complex binary construct that encompasses subjective elements of both affect and cognition that contribute to well- being. Subjective well-being (SWB), according to Lyubomirsky and Dickerhoof (2006) “ represents people’s beliefs and feelings about whether they are leading a rewarding and desirable life (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Articles Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness Rick Swedloff Rutgers School of Law Peter H. Huang University of Colorado Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles Part of the Law and Psychology Commons, Legal Remedies Commons, and the Torts Commons Citation Information Rick Swedloff and Peter H. Huang, Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness, 85 IND. L.J. 553 (2010), available at https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/articles/224. Copyright Statement Copyright protected. Use of materials from this collection beyond the exceptions provided for in the Fair Use and Educational Use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Law may violate federal law. Permission to publish or reproduce is required. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Colorado Law Faculty Scholarship at Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Colorado Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. +(,121/,1( Citation: 85 Ind. L.J. 553 2010 Provided by: William A. Wise Law Library Content downloaded/printed from HeinOnline Tue Feb 28 17:01:05 2017 -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at http://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text. -- To obtain permission to use this article beyond the scope of your HeinOnline license, please use: Copyright Information Tort Damages and the New Science of Happiness* RICK SWEDLOFF** & PETER H.
    [Show full text]
  • Theories of Happiness
    Theories of Happiness On the Origins of Happiness and Our Contemporary Conception Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität zu Bonn vorgelegt von Ryan Hanlon Bremner aus Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A. Bonn, 2011 Gedruckt mit der Genehmigung der Philosophischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Zusammensetzung der Prüfungskommission: Prof. Dr. Hans-Joachim Pieper (Vorsitzender) Prof. Dr. Christoph Horn (Betreuer und Gutachter) Prof. Dr. Wolfram Hogrebe (Gutachter) Prof. Dr. Theo Kobusch (weiteres prüfungsberechtigtes Mitglied) Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 16.07.08 2 Acknowledgments More than a few people offered me great assistance in my time in Bonn, and I am sure that I will not be able to remember everyone I ought to thank. Alexander Brenig, Stephan Cursiefen, Phillip Disselbeck, Miriam Ossa, Corinna Mieth, Katja Thierjung and others each bore part of the burden of proofreading reams of German papers and applications, including many related to this dissertation. My adviser, Prof. Dr. Christoph Horn, as well as Jörn Müller, Thomas Müller, and Jacob Rosenthal were a great help to me in clarifying my ideas for the dynamic affective standard theory. It seems that through the years virtually the entire faculty of the Philosophisches Seminar in Bonn has offered me assistance in one way or another. For their support I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz, Prof. Dr. Theo Kobusch, and especially both Prof. Dr. Christoph Horn and Prof. Dr. Wolfram Hogrebe. Without their strong and wide-ranging support throughout the past five years, this dissertation would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]