Separation Vs. Integration Legacy, Identity, Nationalism
POLSKA AKADEMIA UMIEJĘTNOŚCI TOM XXVI STUDIA ŚRODKOWOEUROPEJSKIE I BAŁKANISTYCZNE 2017 DOI 10.4467/2543733XSSB.17.027.8325 DUŠAN T. BATAKOVIĆ Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade THE CASE OF KOSOVO: SEPARATION VS. INTEGRATION LEGACY, IDENTITY, NATIONALISM Keywords: Serbia, Kosovo, ethnic-strife, Albanians, Serbs, 1999 NATO intervention, interna- tional policy, ethnic discrimination, self-proclaimed independence The Difficult Legacy Kosovo (Kosovo and Metohija) consists of two distinct areas: Kosovo proper and Metohija, with portions of territories which were not considered to belong to these two areas. A valley between the cities of Kosovska Mitrovica and Uroševac, Kosovo proper is eighty-four kilometres long and roughly fourteen kilometres wide. Since medieval times the Kosovo valley has been a densely populated area, an important crossroad of vital transport routes in the Western Balkans, linking the Adriatic Sea with the lower Danube basin. Kosovo and Metohija are rich with both agricultural and mineral resources1. The other area geographically separated from Kosovo by the hills of Drenica has been, for centuries, known as Metohija. Marked since the medieval period by hundreds of Serb Christian Orthodox churches, monasteries and their dependencies (metochion– signifying in Greek language the church property) Metohija is renowned by splendid endowments of Serbian rulers and landlords2. Bordering northern Albania in the west, Metohija is a highly fertile agrarian flatland that stretches roughly from the towns of Istok and Peć in the north to the Djakovica and Prizren area (Prizrenski Podgor) further south. 1 Atanasije U r o š e v i ć, Kosovo, Belgrade 1965; Zadužbine Kosova. Spomenici i znamenja srpskog naro- da, A.
[Show full text]