NATURESCAPE BRITISH COLUMBIA Caring for Wildlife Habitat at Home

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NATURESCAPE BRITISH COLUMBIA Caring for Wildlife Habitat at Home The Stewardship Series NATURESCAPE BRITISH COLUMBIA Caring for Wildlife Habitat at Home Native Plant and Animal Booklet, Coast and Mountains Naturescape British Columbia IS FUNDED BY For More information, call 1-800-387-9853 National Library of Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Naturescape British Columbia. Native plant and animal booklet, coast & mountains. – [Stewardship series] Consists of 2 v. in 1. Title on v. [2]: Naturescape British Columbia. Resource booklet, coast & mountains. Vol. [2] compiled by Saila Hull. Also available on the Internet. ISBN 0-7726-5179-5 1. Animals - British Columbia. 2. Plants - British Columbia. 3. Biotic communities - British Columbia. 4. Coastal ecology - British Columbia. 5. Nature conservation - Bibliography. 6. Nature conservation - British Columbia – Information resources. 7. Pacific Coast (B.C.) – Environmental conditions. I. MacDonald, Andrew, 1965- II. Hull, Saila. III. Naturescape British Columbia. IV. Title: Naturescape British Columbia. Resource booklet, coast & mountains. QH77.C3 N37 2004 578’.097111 C2004-960069-9 Notice: The information contained in the Naturescape British Columbia Guide and booklets is true and complete to the best of our knowledge. All recommendations are made without any guarantees on the part of the authors and Naturescape British Columbia sponsors. Because the means, materials and procedures followed by home- owners are beyond our control, the authors and Naturescape British Columbia disclaim all liability in connection with the use of this information. Naturescape British Columbia publications are copyright© 1995 by the Government of British Columbia. All rights reserved. Except for use in review, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including xerography, photocopying, and recording, and in any information storage and retrieval system is forbidden without the written permission of Naturescape British Columbia and Havitat Conservation Trust Foundation Photo credits: Front Cover Mount Moresby Kimiko von Boetticher Back Cover Tow Hill Wm Merilees Wildlife Tree Aaron Bremner Mushroom Aaron Bremner Boy with Back Pack Aaron Bremner Naturescape British Columbia Swallowfail Butterfly Tammy Keetch Havitat Conservation Trust Foundation Red Columbine Tammy Keetch Suite 107 19 Dallas Road Victoria BC Common Meganser Tammy Keetch V8V 5A6 www.naturescapebc.ca NAT U R E S C A P E BR I T I S H CO L U M B I A Native Plant and Animal Booklet, Coast & Mountains W r itten and compiled by Andrew MacDonald (Project Leader) Shane Ford Matt Fairbarn s C r is Guppy Liz Crocke r Dennis Demarchi G r aphic Design and Electronic A s s e m bly Bobolo Design Group I l l u s t r a t o r Andrew MacDonald About Naturescape British Columbia ABOUT NATURESCAPE BRITISH COLUMBIA Naturescape British Columbia promotes caring for wildlife habitat at home. It is funded by W i l d l i fe Habitat Canada, E nvironment Canada (Canadian W i l d l i fe Serv i c e ) , B r itish Columbia Wa t e r, Land and Air Protection, the Habitat Conservation Trust Fund, and the Real Estate Foundation of BC and the participants who register in the Naturescape Progra m . The support and assistance of the Federation of B r itish Columbia Natura l i s t s , B r itish Columbia Nurs e r y Trades A s s o c i a t i o n , B r itish Columbia Society of Landscape A r c h i t e c t s , and the Urban W i l d l i fe Committee (Va n c o u ver) is greatly appreciated. H O N O U R A RY PAT R O N The Honoura ble John A . F r a s e r, P. C . , O. C . , O. B . C . , Q. C. , L L . B . N ATURESCAPE A DV I S O RY SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBU TO R S C O M M I T T E E AND REVIEWERS Pa t r icia Banning-Love r, Ve r non C. B r i n k , Va n c o u ver WBT Wild Bird Trust of B. C . , West Va n c o u ve r Dennis Demarchi,V i c t o r i a Ve r non C. B r i n k , Va n c o u ver Natural History Society,Va n c o u ve r Susan Campbell,Va n c o u ve r Susan Campbell, G r i f fin Wo r k s , Va n c o u ve r Neil Dawe, Qualicum Beach Gretchen Harl ow, Angela Deeri n g , V i c t o r i a Canadian W i l d l i fe Serv i c e , D e l t a L a u r a Fri i s , V i c t o r i a Theresa Duynstee, Greater Va n c o u ver Regional Distri c t Liz Stanlake,V i c t o r i a Linda Georg e ,Va n c o u ve r Linda Kingston, F e d e r ation of B. C . N a t u r alists and Va n c o u ver Natural History Society, B u r n a by Pa t r icia Leslie,Va n c o u ve r Willie MacGillivray, Swan Lake Christmas Hill Nature Sanctuary,V i c t o r i a B a r b a r a Stevenson Nield,Va n c o u ve r Sylvia Pincott, F e d e r ation of B. C . N a t u r a l i s t s , Pender Island Rod Silve r, C h a i r, Naturescape A d v i s o r y Committee,V i c t o r i a Paulus V r i j m o e d , B. C . N u r s e r y Trades A s s o c i a t i o n , L a n g l e y Ta ble of Contents TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S I n t r o d u c t i o n . .2 Ecosystems and Ecosystem Dive r s i t y . .2 H ow Ecosystems are Classified in British Columbia . .5 The Southern Alaska Mountains Ecoprov i n c e . .6 The Coast & Mountains Ecoprov i n c e . .7 Putting It All Together In Your Ya r d . .1 6 S u m m a r y of Plant and Animal Ta bl e s , Coast & Mountains Ta ble 1: Native Plants . .1 9 Ta ble 2: Non-native Plants . .3 9 Ta ble 3: B u t t e r f l i e s , Moths and Other Insects . .4 2 Ta ble 4: Amphibians and Reptiles . .5 0 Ta ble 5: B i r d s . .5 3 Ta ble 6: M a m m a l s . .6 3 P L A N T A N D A N I M A L B O O K L E T , C O A S T & M O U N T A I N S • N a t u r e s c a p e B r i t i s h C o l u m b i a 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n I N T RO D U C T I O N This Native Plant and Animal Booklet explains the The Provincial Guide has give n broader natural environment within which you live, you the basic how - t o and allows you to determine the general types of i n fo r mation for creating wildlife habitat in yo u r w i l d l i fe habitats you might consider when planning ya r d . The next step is to consider the type of N a t u re s c ap e p r o j e c t s . It includes a listing of habitat appropriate to your location in the Coast plants and examples of their uses by wildlife, a n d & Mountains. What plants should you consider? listings of wildlife species with notes on their And what animals can you expect to attract? n a t u r al history. To answer these questions, l e t ’s fi r st venture into E C O S YSTEMS AND ECOSYS T E M the surroundings beyond your home. L e t ’s explore D I V E R S I T Y the concept of ecosystems and the physical area of Ecosystem Defined the Coast & Mountains to take a look at where An ecosystem is a concept. The term applies to a your property sits in this larger scheme of things. set of living organisms and non-living elements, a n d Then we can return to your outdoor space and their interaction with each other in both obv i o u s begin to answer your questions. and subtle way s . To get a better sense of our sustaining You can think of an ecosystem as being any e nv i r o n m e n t , we need a different pers p e c t i ve – segment of the wo r ld that includes all the one that looks beyond the neighbourhoods and o r ganisms and the environment within which they t own sites. While it is still possible in Bri t i s h o c c u r. The entire system must have a pri m a r y Columbia to look over mountains and plateaus e n e r gy source, which is genera l ly the sun.
Recommended publications
  • Tesis. Síndromes De Polinización En
    Dr. Luis Giménez Benavides, Profesor Contratado Doctor del Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica de la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, CERTIFICA Que los trabajos de investigación desarrollados en la memoria de tesis doctoral, “Síndromes de polinización en Silene. Evolución de las interacciones polinizador-depredador con Hadena” son aptos para ser presentados por el Ldo. Samuel Prieto Benítez ante el tribunal que en su día se consigne, para aspirar al Grado de Doctor en el Programa de Doctorado de Conservación de Recursos Naturales por la Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid. V°B° Director de Tesis Dr. Luis Giménez Benavides TESIS DOCTORAL Síndromes de polinización en Silene. Evolución de las interacciones polinizador- depredador con Hadena. Samuel Prieto Benítez Dirigida por: Luis Giménez Benavides Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Mayo 2015 A mi familia y a Sofía, gracias por el apoyo y el cariño que me dais. ÍNDICE RESUMEN Antecedentes 11 Objetivos 19 Metodología 20 Conclusiones 25 Referencias 27 Lista de manuscritos 33 CAPÍTULOS/CHAPTERS Capítulo 1/Chapter 1 35 Revisión y actualización del estado de conocimiento de las relaciones polinización- depredación entre Caryophyllaceae y Hadena (Noctuidae). Capítulo 2/Chapter 2 65 Diel Variation in Flower Scent Reveals Poor Consistency of Diurnal and Nocturnal Pollination Syndromes in Sileneae. Capítulo 3/Chapter 3 113 Floral scent evolution in Silene: a multivariate phylogenetic analysis. Capítulo 4/Chapter 4 145 Flower circadian rhythm restricts/constraints pollination generalization and prevents the escape from a pollinator-seed predating specialist in Silene. Capítulo 5/Chapter 5 173 Spatio-temporal variation in the interaction outcome between a nursery pollinator and its host plant when other other pollinators, fruit predators and nectar robbers are present.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Phyciodes Butterfly Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): Complex Mtdna Variation and Species Delimitations
    Systematic Entomology (2003) 28, 257±273 Phylogenetic relationships of Phyciodes butterfly species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): complex mtDNA variation and species delimitations NIKLAS WAHLBERG*, RITA OLIVEIRA* andJAMES A. SCOTTy *Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Ecology and Systematics, University of Helsinki, Finland, and yLakewood, Colorado, U.S.A. Abstract. Mitochondrial DNA variation wasstudied in the butterfly genus Phyciodes (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) by sequencing 1450 bp of the COI gene from 140 individuals of all eleven currently recognized species. The study focused on four species in particular that have been taxonomically difficult for the past century, P. tharos, P. cocyta, P. batesii and P. pulchella. A cladistic analysis of ninety-eight unique haplotypesshowedthat Phyciodes formsa monophyletic group with P. graphica as the most basal species. Of the three informal species groupsdescribed for Phyciodes, only one (the mylitta-group) isunambiguously monophyletic. Within the tharos-group, seven well supported clades were found that correspond to three taxa, P. tharos, P. pulchella and a grade consisting of P. cocyta and P. batesii haplotypesinterdigitated with each other. None of the clades is formed exclusively by one species. The patterns of haplotype variation are the result of both retained ancient polymorphism and introgression. Introgression appearsto be mostcommon between P. cocyta and P. batesii; however, these two species occur sympatrically and are morphologically and ecologically distinct, suggesting that the level of current introgression does not seem to be enough to threaten their genetic integrity. The results indicate that mitochondrial DNA sequences must be used with great caution in delimiting species, especially when infraspecific samples are few, or introgression seems to be rampant.
    [Show full text]
  • Garibaldi Provincial Park M ASTER LAN P
    Garibaldi Provincial Park M ASTER LAN P Prepared by South Coast Region North Vancouver, B.C. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Garibaldi Provincial Park master plan On cover: Master plan for Garibaldi Provincial Park. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-7726-1208-0 1. Garibaldi Provincial Park (B.C.) 2. Parks – British Columbia – Planning. I. British Columbia. Ministry of Parks. South Coast Region. II Title: Master plan for Garibaldi Provincial Park. FC3815.G37G37 1990 33.78”30971131 C90-092256-7 F1089.G3G37 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS GARIBALDI PROVINCIAL PARK Page 1.0 PLAN HIGHLIGHTS 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Plan Purpose 2 2.2 Background Summary 3 3.0 ROLE OF THE PARK 4 3.1 Regional and Provincial Context 4 3.2 Conservation Role 6 3.3 Recreation Role 6 4.0 ZONING 8 5.0 NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 11 5.1 Introduction 11 5.2 Natural Resources Management: Objectives/Policies/Actions 11 5.2.1 Land Management 11 5.2.2 Vegetation Management 15 5.2.3 Water Management 15 5.2.4 Visual Resource Management 16 5.2.5 Wildlife Management 16 5.2.6 Fish Management 17 5.3 Cultural Resources 17 6.0 VISITOR SERVICES 6.1 Introduction 18 6.2 Visitor Opportunities/Facilities 19 6.2.1 Hiking/Backpacking 19 6.2.2 Angling 20 6.2.3 Mountain Biking 20 6.2.4 Winter Recreation 21 6.2.5 Recreational Services 21 6.2.6 Outdoor Education 22 TABLE OF CONTENTS VISITOR SERVICES (Continued) Page 6.2.7 Other Activities 22 6.3 Management Services 22 6.3.1 Headquarters and Service Yards 22 6.3.2 Site and Facility Design Standards
    [Show full text]
  • Moths & Butterflies of Grizzly Peak Preserve
    2018 ANNUAL REPORT MOTHS & BUTTERFLIES OF GRIZZLY PEAK PRESERVE: Inventory Results from 2018 Prepared and Submi�ed by: DANA ROSS (Entomologist/Lepidoptera Specialist) Corvallis, Oregon SUMMARY The Grizzly Peak Preserve was sampled for butterflies and moths during May, June and October, 2018. A grand total of 218 species were documented and included 170 moths and 48 butterflies. These are presented as an annotated checklist in the appendix of this report. Butterflies and day-flying moths were sampled during daylight hours with an insect net. Nocturnal moths were collected using battery-powered backlight traps over single night periods at 10 locations during each monthly visit. While many of the documented butterflies and moths are common and widespread species, others - that include the Western Sulphur (Colias occidentalis primordialis) and the noctuid moth Eupsilia fringata - represent more locally endemic and/or rare taxa. One geometrid moth has yet to be identified and may represent an undescribed (“new”) species. Future sampling during March, April, July, August and September will capture many more Lepidoptera that have not been recorded. Once the site is more thoroughly sampled, the combined Grizzly Peak butterfly-moth fauna should total at least 450-500 species. INTRODUCTION The Order Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) is an abundant and diverse insect group that performs essential ecological functions within terrestrial environments. As a group, these insects are major herbivores (caterpillars) and pollinators (adults), and are a critical food source for many species of birds, mammals (including bats) and predacious and parasitoid insects. With hundreds of species of butterflies and moths combined occurring at sites with ample habitat heterogeneity, a Lepidoptera inventory can provide a valuable baseline for biodiversity studies.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title The utility of repeated presence data as a surrogate for counts: A case study using butterflies Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/13r5464h Journal Journal of Insect Conservation, 18(1) ISSN 1366-638X Authors Casner, KL Forister, ML Ram, K et al. Publication Date 2014-02-01 DOI 10.1007/s10841-013-9610-8 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The utility of repeated presence data as a surrogate for counts: a case study using butterflies Kayce L. Casner, Matthew L. Forister, Karthik Ram & Arthur M. Shapiro Journal of Insect Conservation An international journal devoted to the conservation of insects and related invertebrates ISSN 1366-638X Volume 18 Number 1 J Insect Conserv (2014) 18:13-27 DOI 10.1007/s10841-013-9610-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science +Business Media Dordrecht. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”.
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Floral Scent Compounds for the Interaction
    Importance of floral scent compounds for the interaction between Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae) and the nursery pollinator Hadena bicruris (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften – Dr. rer. nat. – der Fakultät Biologie / Chemie / Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth Vorgelegt von Stefan Dötterl Bayreuth, Mai 2004 Die vorliegende Arbeit wurde von Mai 2001 bis Mai 2004 am Lehrstuhl Pflanzensystematik der Universität Bayreuth in der Arbeitsgruppe von Frau Prof. Dr. Sigrid Liede-Schumann angefertigt. Gefördert durch ein Stipendium der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (Graduiertenkolleg 678). Vollständiger Abdruck der von der Fakultät Biologie, Chemie, und Geowissenschaften der Universität Bayreuth genehmigten Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.). Tag der Einreichung: 10.05.2004 Tag des wissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums: 27.07.2004 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. S. Liede-Schumann 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. K. Fiedler Prüfungsausschuss: PD Dr. G. Aas Prof. Dr. K. H. Hoffmann Prof. Dr. C. Unverzagt Contents 1. General Introduction 1 2. Geographic variation of flower scent in Silene latifolia 8 3. Antennal and behavioural responses of the nursery pollinator H. bicruris to various chemotypes of its most important host plant, Silene latifolia, and to S. vulgaris 36 4. Antennal and behavioural responses of Hadena bicruris to floral volatiles of its main host plant, Silene latifolia 64 5. Spatial fragrance patterns in flowers of Silene latifolia: Lilac compounds as olfactory nectar guides? 92 6. Synopsis 111 7. Summary 124 8. Zusammenfassung 127 Darstellung des Eigenanteils 131 Acknowledgements 132 Erklärung 134 1 General Introduction 1. General Introduction Worldwide, at least thirteen nursery pollination systems, in which pollinators reproduce within the flowers they pollinate are known (nursery pollination, Dufay and Anstett, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Systematics of Phyciodes (Phyciodes)
    cf#']i:z 10 Feb. 20, 1998 PAPILIO ~ $4.00 - ..- ·-- .. -· - ~- - PHYCIODES (PHYCIOD£S): N£W DISCOVERIES, NEW SUBSPECIES, AND comf£R6ENCE by DR. JAMES A. SCOTT 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226 Abstract. The paper presents new discoveries in Phyciodes (Phyciodes ). New life history information is given for P. mylitta arizonensis, P. pallida pallida, P. pallida barnesi, P. tharos tharos, P. cocyta selenis, P. cocyta dimin'utor, P. batesii lakota, P. b. apsaalooke, P. b. anasazi, P. pulchella camillus, and P. picta picta. P. batesii anasazi was found to significantly converge toward P. cocyta in western Colorado in appearance of some adults larvae and pupae, and P. cocyta selenis from the same area was found to converge a little toward anasazi in adult wing pattern and larval head pattern, so some individuals of these two tax.a are difficult to distinguish. The nomenclatural identity of P. tharos form marcia is clarified. Five new subspecies are named: P. tharos orantain has orange antenna nudum and is somewhat intermediate between P. tharos tharos and P. cocyta. P. cocyta diminutor is multivoltine with late-flying summer generations that are small like P. tharos, and might possibly even be a separate species from the sympatric univoltine larger P. cocyta selenis. P. pulchella deltarufa has oranger ups than ssp. pulchella. P. pulchella owimba differs from ssp. pulchella by having an orange antenna nudum and some different wing pattern details. P. phaon jalapeno has paler median ups bands. INTRODUCTION Scott (1994) reported on the systematics and biology of Phyciodes (Phyciodes), described numerous new life histories, named five new tax.a, and corrected prior nomenclature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Butterfly Inventories in Boulder County Open Space Properties
    2010 Butterfly Inventories In Boulder County Open Space Properties By Janet Chu October 2, 2010 1 Table of Contents I. Acknowledgments …………………… 3 II. Abstract …………………………… 4 II. Introduction……………………………… 5 IV. Objectives ………………………….. 6 V. Research Methods ………………….. 7 VI. Results and Discussion ………………... 8 VII. Weather ………………………………… 12 VIII. Conclusions …………………………….. 13 VIII. Recommendations …………………….. 15 IX. References …………………………. 16 X. Butterfly Survey Data Tables …………. 17 Table I. Survey Dates and Locations ……………. 17 Table II. Southeast Buffer …………………. 18 Table III. Anne U. White – Fourmile Trail …… 21 Table IV. Heil Valley Open Space –Geer Watershed... 24 Table V. Heil Valley Open Space –Plumely Canyon 27 Table VI. Heil Valley Open Space – North ………… 30 Table VII. Walker Ranch - Meyer’s Gulch ………… 34 Table VIII. Caribou Ranch Open Space ……………… 37 Table IX. Compilation of Species and Locations …… 38 2 I. Acknowledgments Our research team has conducted butterfly surveys for nine consecutive years, from 2002 through 2010, with 2002-2004 introductory to the lands and species, and 2005-2010 in more depth. My valuable field team this year was composed of friends with sharp eyes and ready binoculars Larry Crowley who recorded not only the butterflies but blossoming plants and wildlife joined by Jean Morgan and Amy Chu both joined enthusiastic butterfly chasers. Venice Kelley and John Barr, professional photographers, joined us on many surveys. With their digital photos we are often able to classify the hard-to-identify butterflies later on at the desk. The surveys have been within Boulder County Parks and Open Space (BCPOS) lands. Therese Glowacki, Manager-Resource Manager, issued a Special Collection Permit for access into the Open Spaces; Susan Spaulding, Wildlife Specialist, oversaw research, maintained records of our monographs and organized seminars for presentation of data.
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio (New Series) # 25 2016 Issn 2372-9449
    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) # 25 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 ERNEST J. OSLAR, 1858-1944: HIS TRAVEL AND COLLECTION ITINERARY, AND HIS BUTTERFLIES by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. Ernest John Oslar collected more than 50,000 butterflies and moths and other insects and sold them to many taxonomists and museums throughout the world. This paper attempts to determine his travels in America to collect those specimens, by using data from labeled specimens (most in his remaining collection but some from published papers) plus information from correspondence etc. and a few small field diaries preserved by his descendants. The butterfly specimens and their localities/dates in his collection in the C. P. Gillette Museum (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado) are detailed. This information will help determine the possible collection locations of Oslar specimens that lack accurate collection data. Many more biographical details of Oslar are revealed, and the 26 insects named for Oslar are detailed. Introduction The last collection of Ernest J. Oslar, ~2159 papered butterfly specimens and several moths, was found in the C. P. Gillette Museum, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado by Paul A. Opler, providing the opportunity to study his travels and collections. Scott & Fisher (2014) documented specimens sent by Ernest J. Oslar of about 100 Argynnis (Speyeria) nokomis nokomis Edwards labeled from the San Juan Mts. and Hall Valley of Colorado, which were collected by Wilmatte Cockerell at Beulah New Mexico, and documented Oslar’s specimens of Oeneis alberta oslari Skinner labeled from Deer Creek Canyon, [Jefferson County] Colorado, September 25, 1909, which were collected in South Park, Park Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy
    Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy Disclaimer: This draft management plan contains preliminary proposals that are subject to change and therefore may not necessarily reflect the position of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy. At the conclusion of the planning process, a revised management plan will be approved by the Ministry. Draft Management Plan June 29, 2018 Cover Page Photo Credit: Scott Flavelle Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy Draft Management Plan <signature page for FINAL version> Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy Draft Management Plan iii Acknowledgements Preparation of this management plan for Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy has been jointly undertaken by the Lil’wat Nation and BC Parks (hereafter referred to as the “Parties”). The management planning process was coordinated by Harriet VanWart, Director, Land and Resources Department of the Lil’wat Nation, and Vicki Haberl, Planning Section Head, South Coast Region, BC Parks. A planning team was set up with Harriet, Vicki, Councillor Greg Bikadi of the Lil’wat Nation, and Chris Platz, BC Parks Area Supervisor. Liz Scroggins of Grey Owl Consulting prepared the management plan drafts for review by Lil’wat Nation and BC Parks, under contract to Lil’wat Nation. The Parties acknowledge that Nlháxten/Cerise Creek Conservancy is in the shared territory of the N’Quatqua First Nation, Sekw’el’was (Cayoose Creek) First Nation, and T’it’q’et First Nation, and are grateful for their support and cooperation in developing this management plan, and for the shared St’at’imc value of i tmícwsa i ucwalmícwa (the people and the land are one) that has guided this planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Monica Mountains Butterfly List
    Santa Monica Mountains Butterfly List Probable in Griffith Park Abundance Codes: A- Abundant C- Common Possible in Griffith Park U- Uncommon R- Rare ?- Not Yet Found Food Plant Flight Time Swallowtails Papilionidae Anise Swallowtail Papilio zelicaon Fennel or other carrot family All year Giant Swallowtail Papilio cresphones Citrus Mar-Oct Western Tiger Swallowtail Papilio rutulus Mostly sycamore; cottonwood, willow, alder All year Pale Swallowtail Papilio eurymedon Ceanothus, other buckthorn family Feb-Oct White and Sulphurs Pieridae Whites Becker's White Pontia beckerii Bladderpod Feb-Aug Checkered White Pontia protodice Mustards, native and non-native All year Cabbage White Pieris rapae Black mustard, wild radish, nasturtium All year Sara Orangetip Anthocharis sara Native mustards Feb-June Sulphurs Orange Sulphur Colias eurytheme Various pea family: lotus, clover, vetch All year Harford's Sulphur Colias harfordii Astragalus (locoweed or rattleweed) Apr-Sept California Dogface Colias eurydice False indigo (Amorpha californica) Mar-Sept Cloudless Sulphur Phoebis sennae Cassia (Senna) Mar-Oct Sleepy Orange Eurema nicippe Cassia (Senna) Mar-Oct Dainty Sulphur Nathalis iole Various sunflower family Mar-Nov Gossamer-Wings Lycaenidae Coppers Tailed Copper Lycaena arota Wild currant or goooseberry (Ribes) May-July Gorgon Copper Lycaena gorgon Wand Buckwheat (Eriogonum elongatum) Apr-July Hairstreaks Great Purple Hairstreak Atlides halesus Mistletoe in sycamores or cottonwood Mar-Oct California Hairstreak Satyrium californica Ceanothus (wild
    [Show full text]
  • A Range-Wide Restoration Strategy for Whitebark Pine (Pinus Albicaulis)
    United States Department A Range-Wide Restoration Strategy for of Agriculture Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis) General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-279 June 2012 Keane, Robert E.; Tomback, D.F.; Aubry, C.A.; Bower, A.D.; Campbell, E.M.; Cripps, C.L.; Jenkins, M.B.; Mahalovich, M.F.; Manning, M.; McKinney, S.T.; Murray, M.P.; Perkins, D.L.; Reinhart, D.P.; Ryan, C.; Schoettle, A.W.; Smith, C.M. 2012. A range-wide restoration strategy for whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis). Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-279. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 108 p. ABSTRACT Whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis), an important component of western high- elevation forests, has been declining in both the United States and Canada since the early Twentieth Century from the combined effects of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreaks, fire exclusion policies, and the spread of the exotic disease white pine blister rust (caused by the pathogen Cronartium ribicola). The pine is now a candidate species for listing under the Endangered Species Act. Within the last decade, with major surges of pine beetle and increasing damage and mortality from blister rust, the cumulative whitebark pine losses have altered high-elevation community composition and ecosystem processes in many regions. Whitebark pine is a keystone species because of its various roles in supporting community diversity and a foundation species for its roles in promoting community development and stability. Since more than 90 percent of whitebark pine forests occur on public lands in the United States and Canada, maintaining whitebark pine communities requires a coordinated and trans-boundary effort across Federal and provincial land management agencies to develop a comprehensive strategy for restoration of this declining ecosystem.
    [Show full text]