DOCSLIB.ORG

November 23, 2016 Alex Weresow Executive Producer Slauson Productions, LLC C/O UPS Store 10736 Jefferson Blvd. Culver City, CA 9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
November 23, 2016 Alex Weresow Executive Producer Slauson Productions, LLC C/O UPS Store 10736 Jefferson Blvd. Culver City, CA 9 C H U R C H O F S CIENTOLOGY I NTERNATIONAL November 23, 2016 Alex Weresow Executive Producer Slauson Productions, LLC c/o UPS Store 10736 Jefferson Blvd. Culver City, CA 90230 Re: The Practice of “Disconnection” Dear Mr. Weresow: Enclosed is a statement for use on your program explaining the Church of Scientology’s view on disconnection. It is a voluntary decision by the individual that is consistent with many other faiths. It has been part of Church policy, laid down by Founder L. Ron Hubbard, since the 1960s. To put this all in perspective, the overriding policy of the Church is to encourage family relationships. To promote your sources’ line that families and friends were forced to disconnect from them when they left the Church, whether or not they attacked Scientology, is false and misleading. Your sources are using family conflicts they generated as a forum to manufacture publicity in support of their anti-religious agenda. Slauson Productions is giving its sources a forum to mislead viewers. Many religions today such as the Amish, the Mennonites, the Bahá’í and Jehovah Witnesses practice a form of shunning, a formal decision to cease interaction with an individual or a group. Orthodox and Hasidic Jews practice Herem, the total exclusion of a person from the Jewish community. Considered more broadly, virtually every religion practices some form of social exclusion, whether or not it has a formal ecclesiastical penalty, is in response to an attack, or merely an admonition that one is to avoid the company of evil. Like Scientology, most religions do not forbid contact with people who ___________________________________________________________ 6331 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 1200, Los Angeles, CA, 90028-6329 Slauson Productions 2 November 23, 2016 merely have different beliefs. As can be seen in the enclosed summary, examples of these doctrines exist in all major faith traditions. These religious practices have been upheld as constitutionally protected by multiple court decisions in the United States and elsewhere. There is no requirement in our society that any individual be forced to endure an abusive relationship with a toxic personality, no matter their religious affiliation or lack of any affiliation. Just the opposite. Citizens of this country have a constitutional right to associate with anyone they wish, as well as a right to sever ties to those who are harmful. Members of the Church of Scientology enjoy the same constitutional right. Regards, Karin Pouw cc: Ms. Nancy Dubuc, CEO A+E Networks Mr. Paul Buccieri, President, A&E and History Enclosures: 1. CSI Statement on Disconnection 2. A Comparative Summary of Shunning in World Religions C H U R C H O F S CIENTOLOGY I NTERNATIONAL STATEMENT ON DISCONNECTION There is no policy in Scientology that requires members to disconnect from anyone, family or friends, who have left the Church or who have different religious beliefs. To the contrary, Scientology practice mandates that Scientologists respect the religious beliefs of others. No Scientologist “disconnects” from someone because they left the Church. Disconnection or ceasing to communicate with someone happens when an individual obsessively attacks the individual or those things that affect his spiritual progress, including his religion or Church and only after all other options have been exhausted. The Church does not and cannot order anyone to disconnect—it is a self-determined action. Many of the family members of those Leah Remini and her “co-host” interviewed have all gone on the record to voice their outrage that their personal, private family conflicts are being used as fodder for “reality” television. Each one has informed the show what really shattered their relationships. It was their choice to no longer associate with these toxic personalities. A COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF SHUNNING IN WORLD RELIGIONS shun [shǝn] (v) persistently avoid, ignore, or reject (someone or something) through antipathy or caution. Virtually every world religion practices some form of shunning. As in other religions, Scientologists have a similar practice called disconnection that is often misunderstood or mischaracterized. Scientologists practice disconnection as a last resort after all other avenues of reconciliation have been exhausted. In Scientology, inclusion rather than exclusion is preferred. As with other faiths, Scientology practice does not involve disconnecting from people because they have different beliefs. Scientologists live and work on a daily basis with Jews, Protestants, Catholics, Mormons, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and atheists. Scientologists are taught to respect the faith of others. Here is a summary of religious practices similar to Scientology disconnection: Jewish Doctrines Shunning as an ecclesiastical discipline is still practiced in strictly Orthodox and Chasidic communities. It is even referenced in the Old Testament as in Job: 28:28 (“The fear of the Lord—that is wisdom, and to shun evil is understanding”) and Proverbs 12:26 (“The righteous should choose his friends carefully, for the way of the wicked leads them astray”). Herem is the highest ecclesiastical censure in the Jewish community. It is the total exclusion of a person from the Jewish community. Although it developed from the above Biblical sources, herem, as employed during Talmudic times (70 BCE-500 CE) and during the Middle Ages (400-1400 CE), became a rabbinic institution, the object of which was to preserve Jewish solidarity. Christian Doctrines The Bible contains many references in both the Old and New Testaments to exclude communication with those who are hostile to the faith or its practices, notably in the letters of Paul. Two examples:“I am writing to you not to associate with anyone who bears the name of brother if he is guilty of sexual immorality or greed, or is an idolater, reviler, drunkard, or swindler—not even to eat with such a one,” from I Corinthians 5:11 and “Mark those who cause divisions contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned and avoid them” from Romans 16:17. The interpretation and application of these passages varies widely among Christian denominations and numerous examples exist of current application. Jehovah’s Witnesses Jehovah’s Witnesses practice a form of shunning which they refer to as disfellowshipping. This refers to a person who is not greeted either socially or at meetings following a decision of a judicial committee established by a local congregation that a member is unrepentantly guilty of a “serious sin.” The Jehovah’s Witnesses practice of disfellowshipment has been examined by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and found to be a protected religious practice. [Paul v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., 819 F.2d 87, (1986)] In 2010, the European Court of Human Rights wrote favorably on the practice. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints practices excommunication, as well as the lesser sanctions of private counsel and caution, informal probation, formal probation, and disfellowship. In most cases, excommunication in the Mormon Church is a last resort, used only after repeated warnings. Disfellowshipped individuals are permitted to maintain church membership, but they may not take the sacrament or enter church temples, nor may they offer public prayers or sermons. Disfellowshipped persons may continue to attend most church functions and are permitted to wear temple garments, pay tithes and offerings, and participate in church classes if their conduct is orderly. Disfellowshipment typically lasts for one year, after which one may earn reinstatement. Independent Evangelical Congregations In January 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported an increase in shunning among independent evangelical congregations. Approximately 10-15 percent of evangelical Christian churches practice public disciplining of wayward members. In May 2015, the Southern Baptist Convention shunned then-presidential candidate Ben Carson, a Seventh- Day Adventist, because of his political and theological views. Amish The Amish practice of shunning includes avoiding a former member in every way possible. Excluding that person from both the church and community is considered a means of preserving the Amish culture. At its most severe, other members of the congregation are prohibited almost all contact with an excommunicated member including social and business ties between the member and the congregation, sometimes 2 even marital contact between spouses or family members if one remains in the congregation. Hutterites The Hutterites use shunning as a form of church discipline. Because Hutterites have communal ownership of goods, the effects of excommunication could impose a hardship upon the excluded member and family leaving them without employment income and material assets such as a home. One Hutterite colony in Manitoba, Canada, was involved in a protracted dispute when leaders attempted to force the departure of a group that had been excommunicated but would not leave. Mennonites In the Mennonite Church excommunication is carried out only after many attempts at reconciliation and on someone who is flagrantly and repeatedly violating standards of behavior that the church expects. Occasionally excommunication is also carried out against those who question the church and/or who genuinely differ with the church’s theology. In either case, the church will attempt reconciliation with the member in private. Anabaptist tradition Discipline requires the church to confront a notoriously erring and unrepentant church member, first directly in a very small circle and, if no resolution is forthcoming, expanding the circle in steps eventually to include the entire church congregation. If the errant member persists without repentance and rejects even the admonition of the congregation, that person is excommunicated or excluded from church membership. Exclusion from the church is recognition by the congregation that this person has separated himself or herself from the church by way of his or her visible and unrepentant sin. This is done as a final resort to protect the integrity of the church.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Knows No Heresy”: Jewish Communal Autonomy and the American Court System
    Hindsight Graduate History Journal Vol. VI (Spring 2012) “THE LAW KNOWS NO HERESY”: JEWISH COMMUNAL AUTONOMY AND THE AMERICAN COURT SYSTEM By Jason Schulman Emory University On 15 April 1844, Judge David Lewis Wardlaw of Charleston, South Carolina’s Court of Common Pleas presided over a trial between two factions of synagogue Kahal Kadosh Beth Elohim.1 The so-called “Organ Congregation” represented the temple’s more liberal group, which called for an abridged service, English sermon, and, most controversially, accompanying organ. The other group in the rift—the “Remnants”—was composed of the more traditional members of the congregation that ardently resisted these changes. The predominantly American-born reformers made the case that the more conservative congregation members were “intruders who had exercised the privileges of membership without right.”2 Although the in- fighting in Beth Elohim would later be recognized as paradigmatic of the tensions of Jewish life in America, it was hardly clear at the time that the rupture that had formed in the Charleston community was irreconcilable. Nor, as we shall see, was it a foregone conclusion that the resolution would be found in an American civil court. The schism, between the “Organ Congregation” and the “Remnants”, had developed several years before the court case in the 1840s.3 After the destruction of their synagogue in the Great Fire of 1838, Charleston’s Jews rebuilt Beth Elohim, laying the cornerstones in January 1 State of South Carolina ex relatione Abraham Ottolengui et al. v. G.V. Ancker et al. (1844), cited in James William Hagy, This Happy Land: The Jews of Colonial and Antebellum Charleston (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1993), 254.
    [Show full text]
  • On Robert Alter's Bible
    Barbara S. Burstin Pittsburgh's Jews and the Tree of Life JEWISH REVIEW OF BOOKS Volume 9, Number 4 Winter 2019 $10.45 On Robert Alter’s Bible Adele Berlin David Bentley Hart Shai Held Ronald Hendel Adam Kirsch Aviya Kushner Editor Abraham Socher BRANDEIS Senior Contributing Editor Allan Arkush UNIVERSITY PRESS Art Director Spinoza’s Challenge to Jewish Thought Betsy Klarfeld Writings on His Life, Philosophy, and Legacy Managing Editor Edited by Daniel B. Schwartz Amy Newman Smith “This collection of Jewish views on, and responses to, Spinoza over Web Editor the centuries is an extremely useful addition to the literature. That Rachel Scheinerman it has been edited by an expert on Spinoza’s legacy in the Jewish Editorial Assistant world only adds to its value.” Kate Elinsky Steven Nadler, University of Wisconsin March 2019 Editorial Board Robert Alter Shlomo Avineri Leora Batnitzky Ruth Gavison Moshe Halbertal Hillel Halkin Jon D. Levenson Anita Shapira Michael Walzer J. H.H. Weiler Ruth R. Wisse Steven J. Zipperstein Executive Director Eric Cohen Publisher Gil Press Chairman’s Council Blavatnik Family Foundation Publication Committee The Donigers of Not Bad for The Soul of the Stranger Marilyn and Michael Fedak Great Neck Delancey Street Reading God and Torah from A Mythologized Memoir The Rise of Billy Rose a Transgender Perspective Ahuva and Martin J. Gross Wendy Doniger Mark Cohen Joy Ladin Susan and Roger Hertog Roy J. Katzovicz “Walking through the snow to see “Comprehensive biography . “This heartfelt, difficult work will Wendy at the stately, gracious compelling story. Highly introduce Jews and other readers The Lauder Foundation– home of Rita and Lester Doniger recommended.” of the Torah to fresh, sensitive Leonard and Judy Lauder will forever remain in my memory.” Library Journal (starred review) approaches with room for broader Sandra Earl Mintz Francis Ford Coppola human dignity.” Tina and Steven Price Charitable Foundation Publishers Weekly (starred review) March 2019 Pamela and George Rohr Daniel Senor The Lost Library Jewish Legal Paul E.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was Maimonides Controversial?
    12 Nov 2014, 19 Cheshvan 5775 B”H Congregation Adat Reyim Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Adult Education Why was Maimonides controversial? Introduction Always glad to talk about Maimonides: He was Sephardic (of Spanish origin), and so am I He lived and worked in Egypt, and that's where I was born and grew up His Hebrew name was Moshe (Moses), and so is mine He was a rationalist, and so am I He was a scientist of sorts, and so am I He had very strong opinions, and so do I And, oh yes: He was Jewish, and so am I. -Unfortunately, he probably wasn’t my ancestor. -Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, aka Maimonides, aka The Rambam: b. 1135 (Córdoba, Muslim Spain) – d. 1204 (Fostat, Egypt): Torah scholar, philosopher, physician: Maimonides was the most illustrious figure in Judaism in the post-talmudic era, and one of the greatest of all time… His influence on the future development of Judaism is incalculable. No spiritual leader of the Jewish people in the post- talmudic period has exercised such an influence both in his own and subsequent generations. [Encyclopedia Judaica] -Best-known for Mishneh Torah and Guide for the Perplexed: -Mishneh Torah (Sefer Yad ha-Chazaka) codifies Jewish law. Gathers all laws from Talmud and adds rulings of later Sages. Clear, concise, and logical. No personal opinions. -The Guide for the Perplexed (Dalalat al-Ha'erin; Moreh Nevukhim) is a non-legal philosophical work, for general public, that bridges Jewish and Greek thought. -Controversial in his lifetime and for many centuries afterwards. Controversies concerning Maimonides 1-No need to study Talmud -He appears to downplay study of Talmud.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Types of Commandments
    Sat 2 Feb 2019 / 27 Shevat 5779 B”H Dr Maurice M. Mizrahi Congregation Adat Reyim Torah discussion on Mishpatim Three Types of Commandments Introduction This week’s Torah portion is Mishpatim, meaning “Laws”. The Israelites have just heard the Ten Commandments, and now they learn the details. The parasha has no less than 53 commandments. It begins with: When you acquire a Hebrew slave, he shall serve you for six years; but in the seventh year he shall go free, without paying anything. [Ex. 21:2] And the next four verses give more details on how the slave is to be treated. That’s odd… Why begin with a validation of slavery, albeit with restrictions, when the Israelites themselves have just been rescued from slavery? We expected the Torah to say: “You shall not enslave another person, because you yourselves were slaves in the Land of Egypt.” But it doesn’t. Why not? God figured that Jews would not have accepted Torah if some allowances were not made for existing practices. Three types of commandments There are three types of injunctions in the Torah: 1. You must not do this 2. You may do this, within limits 3. You must do this Over the centuries, the rabbis treated them differently. 1. You must not do this Negative commandments were never qualified. They were the limits of behavior. The rabbis could not find a logical basis for allowing that which is forbidden, except to save a life, and even then with exceptions: 1 -Pikuach nefesh: You may violate any commandment to save a life, except those against idolatry, sexual immorality and murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Judaism and the Ethics of War
    Volume 87 Number 858 June 2005 Judaism and the ethics of war Norman Solomon* Norman Solomon served as rabbi to Orthodox congregations in Britain, and since 1983 has been engaged in interfaith relations and in academic work, most recently at the University of Oxford. He has published several books on Judaism. Abstract The article surveys Jewish sources relating to the justification and conduct of war, from the Bible and rabbinic interpretation to recent times, including special problems of the State of Israel. It concludes with the suggestion that there is convergence between contemporary Jewish teaching, modern human rights doctrine and international law. : : : : : : : The sources and how to read them Judaism, like Christianity, has deep roots in the Hebrew scriptures (“Old Testament”), but it interprets those scriptures along lines classically formulated by the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud, completed shortly before the rise of Islam. The Talmud is a reference point rather than a definitive statement; Judaism has continued to develop right up to the present day. To get some idea of how Judaism handles the ethics of war, we will review a selection of sources from the earliest scriptures to rabbinic discussion in contemporary Israel, thus over a period of three thousand years. The starting point for rabbinic thinking about war is the biblical legisla- tion set out in Deuteronomy 20. In form this is a military oration, concerned with jus in bello rather than jus ad bellum; it regulates conduct in war, but does not specify conditions under which it is appropriate to engage in war. It distin- guishes between (a) the war directly mandated by God against the Canaanites * For a fuller examination of this subject with bibliography see Norman Solomon, “Th e ethics of war in the Jewish tradition”, in Th e Ethics of War, Rochard Sorabji, David Robin et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Privacy and Forbidding Intrusion Into a Person's
    Ubiquitous Presence: Protecting Privacy and Forbidding Intrusion into a Person’s Records in Jewish Law Aviad Hacohen and Gabi Siboni The development of internet use raises serious questions about a person’s right to privacy and the duty of companies to safeguard the confidentiality of information they possess. In practice, too many events have occurred in which confidential information leaks out of the companies responsible for safeguarding it; such information is sometimes even sold to criminals. In the face of these abuses, the western legal system and regulatory agencies have been forced to deal extensively with this seemingly new issue in recent years. Yet, we find that this topic was discussed in some of the earliest sources of Jewish law. This article reviews this development, particularly given incidents in cyberspace in recent years. Keywords: Privacy, Jewish law, cyber, online advertising Introduction Disturbing reports have been published recently about Facebook, the social network giant, and its use of the personal information of its members. Facebook has recently been the subject of negative publicity because of problems it has had in safeguarding the personal data of its users, as well Prof. Aviad Hacohen is president of the Academic Center for Law and Science, dean of its School of Law, and director of its Center for the Instruction and Study of Jewish Law. Prof. Hacohen is a specialist in constitutional law and a research fellow at the Van Leer Jerusalem Institute. Dr. Col. (res.) Gabi Siboni heads the Cyber Security program at the Institute for National Security Studies. The authors would like to thank Adv.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Sources of Asylumx
    High Commissioner’s Dialogue Distr: General on Protection Challenges 20 November 2012 Theme: Faith and Protection English (12-13 December 2012) Original: English English and French only THE PROTECTION OF REFUGEES UNDER JEWISH LAW: A SHORT INTRODUCTION 1. On November 11, 2012, during his keynote address to the General Assembly of the Jewish Federations of North America, the leader of the Union of Reform Judaism 1, Rabbi Rick Jacobs, underscored that “Repairing the World” ( Tikkun olam) is a core tenet of Judaism and to engaging in Jewish life. In so doing, Rabbi Jacobs posed the rhetorical question: “Which is the ‘more Jewish’ act: welcoming the Sabbath…or welcoming the refugee who has fled persecution?” 2. Within Jewish law, few tenets are repeated as much as the commandment; “When a stranger resides with you in your land, you shall not wrong him. The stranger who resides with you shall be to you as one of your citizens; you shall love him as yourself, for you were strangers in the Land of Egypt. I am the Lord your God.” (Leviticus 19:33-34). This tenet is repeated no less than 36 times in the Torah, the first five books of the Bible which were given to Moses, to the Jewish people, and to all humanity, by God. 3. The biblical principle of welcoming and protecting the stranger was not without historical context as, according to Joshua (9:3-27) and throughout Jewish history, Jewish refugees have been joined by non-Jews also fleeing drought, famine, slavery, persecution, and invaders. The duty of protecting strangers vulnerable to xenophobic violence was an important principle for Jews during biblical times and remains so today.
    [Show full text]
  • Studying the Bible: the Tanakh and Early Christian Writings
    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press NPP eBooks Monographs 2019 Studying the Bible: The Tanakh and Early Christian Writings Gregory Eiselein Kansas State University Anna Goins Kansas State University Naomi J. Wood Kansas State University Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks Part of the Biblical Studies Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License Recommended Citation Eiselein, Gregory; Goins, Anna; and Wood, Naomi J., "Studying the Bible: The Tanakh and Early Christian Writings" (2019). NPP eBooks. 29. https://newprairiepress.org/ebooks/29 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Monographs at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in NPP eBooks by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Studying the Bible: The Tanakh and Early Christian Writings Gregory Eiselein, Anna Goins, and Naomi J. Wood Kansas State University Copyright © 2019 Gregory Eiselein, Anna Goins, and Naomi J. Wood New Prairie Press, Kansas State University Libraries Manhattan, Kansas Cover design by Anna Goins Cover image by congerdesign, CC0 https://pixabay.com/photos/book-read-bible-study-notes-write-1156001/ Electronic edition available online at: http://newprairiepress.org/ebooks This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC-BY NC 4.0) License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Publication of Studying the Bible: The Tanakh and Early Christian Writings was funded in part by the Kansas State University Open/Alternative Textbook Initiative, which is supported through Student Centered Tuition Enhancement Funds and K-State Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dilemma of Genocide in the Old Testament
    LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THE DILEMMA OF GENOCIDE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT A THESIS PROJECT SUBMITTED TO LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF THEOLOGY BY DARYL NEIPP LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA FRIDAY, APRIL 13, 2012 ii COPYRIGHT © 2012 DARYL A. NEIPP ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii LIBERTY BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THESIS APPROVAL SHEET ____________ GRADE ________________________________ DR. GARY YATES, MENTOR ________________________________ DR. CHET RODEN, READER iv ABSTRACT THE DILEMMA OF GENOCIDE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT Daryl A. Neipp Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary, 2012 Mentor: Dr. Gary Yates The Old Testament command to destroy every breathing thing within the cities of the Promised Land has long been a problem for those who seek to understand God. In some cases this has become welcome fodder for those who desire to question the credibility of Scripture, while for others it just creates an ethical gap that is simply too far to cross. This thesis will address the challenging issue by demonstrating how God’s command to destroy the Canaanites was an essential component of his redemptive plan in that it brought to fruition the goals of the Abrahamic Covenant and established a line to Christ who would become the ultimate redeemer of the world. ABSTRACT LENGTH: 113 WORDS. v TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1 Statement of the Problem ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dispute Resolution and Kahal Kadosh Talmud Torah: Community Forum and Legal Acculturation in Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam
    Chapter 9 Dispute Resolution and Kahal Kadosh Talmud Torah: Community Forum and Legal Acculturation in Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam Evelyne Oliel-Grausz 1 Introduction This contribution focuses on a little known aspect of Sephardic history: the role of the kehilla or community, and its related institutions, as a forum for the settlement of disputes in Amsterdam in the seventeenth and eighteenth cen- turies. Whereas general depictions of the emergence of the Western diaspora are common in the historical literature of the past decades, in-depth analy- ses of the functional similarities and dissimilarities of the Sephardic kehillot are too rarely conducted.1 As is well known, the Western Sephardic diaspora communities evolved from shared models into distinctive communal enti- ties through a process of differentiation shaped both by internal and external dynamics. The early seventeenth-century Portuguese kehillot on the Elbe and Amstel adopted and adapted the Venetian community model and, in turn, Amsterdam’s institutions inspired the London community’s 1663 statutes. Further West, rippling influences from the Dutch and English models shaped the New World and Caribbean communities. With each step of this evolution, 1 For a historical introduction to the genesis and development of the Western Sephardic Diaspora, see Yosef Kaplan, “The Sephardim in North-Western Europe and the New World,” in Moreshet Sepharad: The Sephardic Legacy, ed. Haim Beinart (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1992), 240–87; for a comparison of the communal enactments regarding excommunication in Amsterdam and Hamburg, see Yosef Kaplan, “The Place of the Herem in the Sephardic Community of Hamburg during the Seventeenth Century,” in Die Sefarden in Hamburg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deuteronomist on Intermarriage
    SEX, RELIGION, AND POLITICS: THE DEUTERONOMIST ON INTERMARRIAGE by Gary N. Knoppers The Pennsylvania State University Introduction The quotation of a legal traditum in I Kgs 11: 1-2 to criticize Solomon is a fascinating but problematic example of inner-biblical exegesis. 1 The author begins his portrayal of Solomon's decline by mentioning Solomon's love for foreign women - Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, Hittites, and the daughter of Pharaoh - "from the nations of which YHWH said to the Israelites: •you shall not have sexual relations with them nor shall they have sexual relations with you; truly, they will turn your heart after their gods."' 2 The censure seems straightforward: Solomon flounders because of his violation of an established divine command. But, upon close scrutiny, two major exegetical difficulties emerge. First, the text that the author of I Kgs 11 :2 quotes appears neither in the Pentateuch nor elsewhere in the Former Prophets. Second, only one of the nations appearing in the MT of 1 Kgs 11: 1-2 (the Hittites) actually appears in th~ Pentateuchal passages (Exod 34:11-16 and Deut 7: 1-4), which prohibit Israelites from intermarrying with any one of the native Canaanite nations. 3 The appearance of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, and Sidonians therefore seems surprising. 1 Kgs 11: 1-4 raises both exegetical and thematic issues. Mixed marriages, often considered to be a distinctly postexilic problem, are pivotal to Solomon's demise. To be sure, the Yahwist (Exod 34:11-16) and the I. In this essay I am basically following Knight's definition of traditum and traditio (1977, pp.
    [Show full text]