(Academy Building) Bridgewater, MA 02324 Patrick Driscoll, Chair Su

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

August 25, 2020 Bridgewater Planning Board 66 Central Square (Academy Building) Bridgewater, MA 02324 Patrick Driscoll, Chair Subject: Fruit Street Flex Building Claremont Properties Map 83 Lot 84 Dear Mr. Driscoll et al. The Taunton River Watershed Alliance (TRWA) would like to provide comments on behalf of the watershed on the proposed Flex Building development off Fruit Street currently before the Board. The TRWA does not oppose development however at a loss to why a Planned Development District was so designated in such a sensitive area that includes a Zone II aquifer for Town Raynham wells, the Hockomock Swamp Area of Critical Concern (ACEC) and Lake Nippenicket. For 32 years, TRWA has been a voice for the 562 square mile Taunton River watershed, an advocate for environmental protection, sustainable development, and responsible stewardship of our precious water resources. We are an Alliance of concerned residents, businesses, and organizations united to restore and properly manage water and related natural resources within the Taunton River Watershed. Our mission is to protect and restore the watershed’s natural resources for current and future generations; build and support responsible stewardship of fragile ecosystems, water quality, forests, farmland, and wetlands; provide opportunities for people to enjoy the river and the watershed’s open space; be an integral resource for environmental education and be voice for threatened land and water resources. TRWA, as stated before, doesn’t oppose development especially development in suitable areas however has serious concerns on the effect this project will have on the aquifer and of the Lake Nippenicket resource area. The building itself will cover 103,000 square feet not to mention the parking lot creating a large amount of impermeable surface over the aquifer which requires permeable surface for recharge. Massachusetts is currently in a severe drought and we are concerned what the effect of this impermeable surface would do to the recharge of the Lake as well as the aquifer. In this area that has been confusingly designated a Priority Development District with only 25 feet of buffer to wetlands we strongly encourage the use of sustainable practices such as permeable pavement and sustainable drainage. If you have any questions please don’t hesitate to contact me at [email protected]. Thank you for considering these comments. Truly yours, Priscilla A. Chapman President .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
[Show full text]
Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts
Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts By JOSEPH H. HARTSHORN GEOLOGY OF SELECTED QUADRANGLES IN MASSACHUSETTS v -GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1163-D Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' Department of Public ff^orks ,UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS ' Page Abstract__ ____-_____-_---___________----__---_----___-------_--- Dl Introduction._ ___-___----____________---_----_------_-------______ 1 Acknowledgments. __.._________,.______-_-_-___-___--______-___ 2 General setting.._.---_____________-_-___'__________-.__________ 2 Pre-Pleistocene geology and history._________________________________ 2 Stratigraphy._______________________----_--------_---_-.______ 3 Structure._______-----____________---------_-----_----____.___ 6 Geologic history._-_-_--__________----_-----_-----_--_-________ 7 Pleistocene geology____-_-_____-_______--__------___-__---_-_______ 8 Glacial erosion._______________________________________________ 8 Glacial deposits.__-_-_.-_______-___---------_---_-_------_.____ 9 Till..---------------------------------------------------- 9 Field and laboratory data..____________________________ 11 * Ground moraine.-.-----------^-------------------- 12 Flowtill. _-______-.-.---------.--------.....-...-_ 19 Textural data.____________________________________
[Show full text]
Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
[Show full text]
Vectordraw Printing
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 3 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 Effective: July 17, 2012 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV001A NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time.
[Show full text]
Éöçpsgsev2qiyvyqsg2weä2yp2
Prepared in cooperation with the OFFICE OF THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE GEOLOGIST COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS STATE GEOLOGIST PORTION OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS S 15U 0 M B H O M Y S E D T E R O 3 P 0 S N A 3 0 T P 0 R IN R R 15 K DESCRIPTION OF MAP UNITS T B E O E L C E V A R OP U S E T I L V T D A A E T N E E E D N H N 9 3 S T I U R C EE 1 Y L T 3 E L A E 5 BOSTON A 0 N T K V 0 0 E U E E R D N I N N IV U T I P S E 0 I E O I K N R 3 E DEDHAM H IG S H T W A R A layer of windblown sand and silt containing sparse ventifacts, and generally 30 A U 0 Y T E S T 9 E 3 C A QUINCY R C 1 S A MILTON mixed with underlying glacial deposits, is present over much of the area but F 5 T A T R N S 0 O CH A T T I D C O KATA R W Y N B A E U U T E N A R K N O has not been mapped separately. V A EE T D D E Q IV N U IS U I I ON E T H Y I GH R W O A 0 Y A 0 R N D A 0 3 HA A 450 T N WESTWOOD 3 I A N N D T H S O T E I R R G E L E S H T T P T E H S E A T T A R R 0 E E 0 V 0 T 3 9 E 0 Artificial Fill - Artificially emplaced earth chiefly along roadways, E 3 T S 3 3 U E N 0 H P A D T U H L 0 I 0 ER A S L 4 E Y N 3 L L R D a f 5 I STR O a f T EE A T railroads, dams and construction sites.
[Show full text]
Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007 National Park Service 1 Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2007 Prepared by National Park Service, Northeast Region In Cooperation with: » Southeast Region Planning and Economic Development District » Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Project Manager: Jamie Fosburgh, Rivers Program Manager, NER-Boston Poject Team: Bill Napolitano Project Leader, SRPEDD Rachel Calabro Principal Author, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, SRPEDD/ MA Riverways Nancy Durfee Outreach & Volunteers, SRPEDD Karen Porter & Maisy McDarby-Stanovich Mapping & Web Page, SRPEDD Special Thanks: Jim Ross Chair, Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Comments on this Draft Report can be sent to: Jamie Fosburgh National Park Service 15 State Street Boston MA 02109 (617) 223-5191 [email protected] Please visit www.tauntonriver.org for more information and links related to the Wild and Scenic River Study, Wild and Scenic River Study Committee, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, and the Taunton River. Companion Document: Taunton River Stewardship Plan, July 2005 Cover Photo: Rachel Calabro. Broad Cove, Dighton. Table of Contents Taunton Wild and Scenic Rivers Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2-4 Summary of Findings 5-7 Chapter I. 5 Background and Need 8-14 Chapter II. 8 Eligibility and Classification Findings (The Affected Environment) 15-19 Chapter III. 15 Suitability Findings (Management Context) 20-25 Chapter IV. 20 Identification and Comparison of Alternatives 27-35 Maps 28-29 Study Area Map 30-31 Eligibility and Classification Findings 32-33 Alternative B: Full Designation 34-35 Alternative C: Designation to Steep Brook (N.
[Show full text]
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4
PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 REVISED NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS
[Show full text]
Massachusetts Fish Tissue Mercury Studies: Long-Term
MassDEP Long-Term Monitoring MASSACHUSETTS FISH TISSUE MERCURY STUDIES: LONG-TERM MONITORING RESULTS, 1999 - 2004 by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Office of Research and Standards 1 Winter St., Boston, MA 02043 and Wall Experiment Station Lawrence, MA 2006 MassDEP Long-Term Monitoring PREFACE In 1994, the first comprehensive Massachusetts statewide examination of mercury in freshwater fish was conducted (MassDEP 1997). This study was followed in 1999 by an investigation of fish mercury concentrations in a region of the state predicted to have regionally high atmospheric deposition of mercury (MassDEP 2003b). That study was complemented by a study of historical mercury deposition into one lake in this region through the analysis of a sediment core using radioisotope dating techniques (Wallace et al. 2004). Additional work addressing mercury emissions and deposition is ongoing. A number of additional studies have been conducted as part of the Department’s continuing efforts to better elucidate the status of the Commonwealth’s freshwater fish populations and environments with respect to mercury contamination. A long-term monitoring network of lakes was established in 2001 to provide temporal tracking of changes in the mercury contamination status of fish in the Commonwealth, particularly as comprehensive mercury use and emissions reductions efforts have been implemented in Massachusetts and regionally. Results from these lakes will also provide a perspective on the scale of natural variability in tissue mercury concentrations for comparison with other sources of variation. The results from the first 5 years of this effort are contained in this report and in particular highlight the changes in fish tissue mercury concentrations which have taken place in the high mercury deposition area during a period when emissions from major point sources of mercury to the atmosphere have declined substantially in Massachusetts and across the region.
[Show full text]
13526-117-50-2-84-CR Approved by Daniel Carter, State Purchasing Agent ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
BASELINEWATER QUALITY STUDIES OF SELECTEDLAKES AND PONDS IN THE TAUNTONRIVER BASIN 1975, 1979, and 1980 DEPARTMENTOF ENVIRONMENTALQUALITY ENGINEERING MASSACHUSETTSDIVISION OF WATERPOLLUTION CONTROL TECHNICALSERVICES BRANCH WESTBOROUGH,MASSACHUSETTS January 1982 PUBLICATION: #13526-117-50-2-84-CR Approved by Daniel Carter, State Purchasing Agent ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Division of Water Pollution Control wishes to thank those whose efforts have made the Taunton River Basin Baseline Lake Surveys and this report possible. The following groups and individuals have been particularly helpful: George Minasian and the staff of the Lawrence Experiment Station who performed the laboratory analyses on the chemical samples from the lakes. The Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife who provided many of the bathymetric maps included in this report. All of the seasonal employees and members of the Technical Services Branch (DEQE) who assisted in gathering the water quality data, 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 2 LIST OF TABLES 5 LIST OF FIGURES 7 A NOTE ON LIMNOLOGYAND LAKE RESTORATIONPROJECTS 9 EUTROPHICATION lO LAKE METHODOLOGY 18 Morphometry 18 Sampling Station Location 18 Data Collection 18 Physical and Chemical Data 18 Biological Data 19 Phytoplankton and Chlorophyll~ 19 Aquatic Vegetation 19 TAUNTONRIVER BASIN LAKE SURVEYS 23 Introduction 23 Lake Descriptions 23 Conclusions 29 BASELINE LAKE SURVEYDATA 30 Island Grove Pond 31 Thirtyacre Pond 37 Brockton Reservoir 43 Waldo Lake 49 Lake Nippenicket 55 Robbins Pond 61 Cleveland
[Show full text]
Mill River Dams Feasibility Study River Restoration and Diadromous Fish Passage
Mill River Dams Feasibility Study River Restoration and Diadromous Fish Passage January 31st, 2008 Prepared for: Massachusetts Riverways Program Riverways Program, DFG 251 Causeway St., Suite 400 Boston, MA 02114 3602 Atwood Avenue Suite 3 Madison, WI 53714 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary........................................................................................................ 5 1.1. State Hospital Dam ................................................................................................ 5 1.2. West Britannia Dam............................................................................................... 8 1.3. Whittenton Pond .................................................................................................... 9 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 13 2.1. Project Team and Scope of Work ........................................................................ 15 2.2. Report Format...................................................................................................... 15 3. Data Collection............................................................................................................. 16 3.1. Existing data ........................................................................................................ 16 3.2. Field data.............................................................................................................. 16 4. Background Information..............................................................................................
[Show full text]
A Survey of the Rumford River
Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Watershed Access Lab Projects Watershed Access Lab 2013 eXstream Ecology: A Survey of the Rumford River Recommended Citation Mansfield High School, Mansfield, Massachusetts (2013). eXstream Ecology: A Survey of the Rumford River. In Watershed Access Lab Projects. Project 130. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/wal_projects/130 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. eXstream Ecology: A Survey of the Rumford River Presented by: Mansfield High School Students Ellen Julia Kerrin Shannon Sarah Sarah Erin Carly Lindsay Presented by: Mansfield High School Students Justin Conor Max Josh Jordan Ben Michael Nina Emma The Rumford River • Part of the Taunton River Watershed • The Rumford River is 14.4 Miles (23.1 Kilometers) long • The river begins in Foxborough and flows through Mansfield to the Norton Reservoir • At the Norton Reservoir, the Rumford River combines with the Wading River to form the Three Mile River • The Three Mile River continues to flow until it combines with the Taunton River in Taunton Rumford River History • Mansfield used to run off water power from the Rumford River along with help from the Wading and Canoe rivers. • At least 21 Water powered factories were at one point active along 3.5 miles of the Rumford River. Location: • The Rumford River is a tributary of the Taunton River which is within the Taunton River Watershed. Fulton’s Pond X 2011 Sample Site N W Kingman’s E Pond S X 2012 Sample Site Rumford River Background Information • Listed on EPA’s National Priority List.
[Show full text]
Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton River Watershed
Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton Watershed June 2017 Stream Continuity Assessment in the Taunton River Watershed Table of Contents Executive Summary p. 5 1. The Importance of Stream Continuity p. 8 2. The Taunton River, its Tributaries and Watershed p. 12 3. Regulatory Standards to Protect Streams p. 18 4. Programs to Identify Priorities for Crossing Upgrade/Replacement p. 19 in Massachusetts A. Geographic Roadway Runoff Inventory Program B. BioMap2 C. Conservation Assessment and Prioritization System (CAPS) D. Critical Linkages Project E. River and Stream Continuity Project/NAACC 5. Stream Crossing Assessment Procedure p. 24 6. Overview of Findings of the Taunton River Watershed Stream Crossing p. 27 Surveys 7. Taunton River Watershed Sites with Significant Potential for Ecological p. 35 Restoration 8. Stream Crossing Success Story p. 45 9. What Cities and Towns Can Do p. 47 Appendix A: Stream Crossings Listed by Town Appendix B: Stream Crossings Listed by Sub-watershed Appendix C: Additional Tables: Table 9. Crossings in Poor or Damaged Condition Table 10. Crossings with Severe Constriction Table 11. Crossings with Skewed Alignment Table 12. Crossings with Inlet and Outlet Drops Table 13. Unassessed Sites Ranked as Tier 1 or 2 1 List of Tables1 Table 1. Number of Sites Surveyed by Municipality with Barrier Evaluation p. 28 Table 2. Crossings Identified as Severe or Significant Barriers to Aquatic p. 29 Passage Table 3. Number of Crossings Surveyed and Barrier Evaluation by p. 31 Sub-watershed Table 4. Example of Information from Database p. 34 Table 5. Highest Priority Sites for Ecological Restoration p. 35 Table 6.
[Show full text]