Open PDF File, 9.54 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Open PDF File, 9.54 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water MATFIELD RIVER SUBWATERSHED The Matfield River and its tributaries drain 77 square miles of the northeast portion of the Taunton River Basin. This subwatershed contains some of the most densely developed areas of the state. The following segments are included in the Matfield River subwatershed (Figure 9): Lovett Brook (Segment MA62-46) Salisbury Brook (Segment MA62-08) Trout Brook (Segment MA62-07) Salisbury Plain River (Segment MA62-05) Salisbury Plain River (Segment MA62-06) Beaver Brook (Segment MA62-09) Meadow Brook (Segment MA62-38) Shumatuscacant River (Segment MA62-33) Poor Meadow Brook (Segment MA62-34) Satucket River (Segment MA62-10) Matfield River (Segment MA62-32) In the northwest section of this subwatershed, Lovett Brook has its headwaters in Brockton and flows south joining Salisbury Brook. Salisbury Brook continues in a southeast direction joining with Trout Brook near downtown Brockton to form the Salisbury Plain River. The Salisbury Plain River flows in a southerly direction through highly urbanized portions of Brockton before heading east to form the Matfield River at its confluence with Beaver Brook in East Bridgewater. Meadow Brook has its origins in Whitman and joins the Matfield River in East Bridgewater. The northeastern section of the Matfield River subwatershed is drained by the 8.5-mile Shumatuscacant River, which runs through the towns of Abington and Whitman and joins Poor Meadow Brook in Hanson. Poor Meadow Brook then flow south westerly to Robbins Pond. The Satucket River originates in Robbins Pond in Bridgewater and meanders in a generally westerly direction before joining the Matfield River in East Bridgewater. The land use in the western portion of the Matfield River subwatershed (Lovett, Salisbury, and Trout Brooks and Salisbury Plain River) is primarily residential followed by forest and some commercial and open space areas. This portion of the Matfield River contains some of the highest concentration of impervious area in the Taunton River watershed with impervious cover values all greater than 25.6%. This indicates that there is the potential for water quality to be impacted by impervious surface water runoff. In the central and eastern portions of the Matfield River Subwatershed (Beaver, Meadow and Poor Meadow Brooks and Shumatuscacant, Satucket and Matfield Rivers) the dominant land use is forest followed by residential and some open area. This includes 1008 acres of land which are classified in the Land-Use theme as cranberry bog (UMass Amherst 1999). The impervious area values are all less than 12.8% indicating there is a low to moderate potential for adverse water quality impacts from impervious surface water runoff. Of the eleven segments in the Matfield subwatershed, five are on the Massachusetts Year 2002 Integrated List of Waters – Category 5 for not meeting Water Quality Criteria. There is one site, the East Bridgewater Murray-Carver Landfill, in the Satucket River segment awaiting a NPL decision. Of the eleven facilities permitted under the WMA, seven are municipal public water supply sources. Authorized surface and groundwater withdrawals total 10.56 MGD. Water use for the cranberry bog areas in the Matfield and Satucket River segments is considerably more, estimated at 17.74 MGD (UMass Amherst 1999). There are four minor NPDES permitted facilities in this subwatershed and one major municipal wastewater discharge facility, the Brockton Advanced Water Reclamation Facility which receives wastewater from approximately 20 industrial users. Low dissolved oxygen/saturation and elevated total phosphorus concentrations instream are associated with the Brockton Advanced Water Reclamation Facility discharge. Both acute and chronic toxicity in the effluent are also of concern impacting the Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report 71 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 Salisbury Plain and Matfield Rivers. Additionally, numerous Multi-sector General Stormwater Permits have been issued for facilities in this subwatershed. The communities of Bridgewater, East Bridgewater, West Bridgewater, Whitman, Hanson, Abington, Brockton, Avon, Stoughton and Holbrook are Phase II stormwater communities. Each community was issued a stormwater general permit from EPA and MassDEP in 2003/2004 and is authorized to discharge stormwater from their municipal drainage system. Over the five-year permit term, the communities will develop, implement, and enforce a stormwater management program to reduce the discharge of pollutants from the storm sewer system to protect water quality (Domizio 2004). The Matfield and Salisbury Plain River Watersheds NPS Assessment study, conducted by ESS, Inc., was initiated in 2002 at the request of local and state stakeholders. The primary goals of the project were to identify sources of NPS pollution and recommend actions to protect and improve water quality. Many of the river and stream segments in the NPS study were found to have impaired water and habitat quality due to extensive development, a lack of stream-side vegetation, and minimal stormwater detention or other treatment (ESS 2003). Additionally, DWM conducted water quality sampling at three sites on the Satucket River, USGS sampled one site on the Matfield River and the Bridgewater State WAL also sampled one site on the Matfield River. Due to the lack of instream biological data, most segments in the Matfield River subwatershed are not assessed for the Aquatic Life Use. Nevertheless, this use is identified with an Alert Status in most of these segments because of concerns over habitat degradation, sedimentation, channel alterations, elevated total phosphorus concentrations, and low dissolved oxygen/saturation concentrations. The Matfield River and portions of Salisbury Brook, Salisbury Plain River and the Shumatuscacant River are assessed as impaired for the Aquatic Life Use due to habitat degradation and impacted macroinvertebrate communities. Because of elevated bacteria levels, most segments are assessed as impaired for the Primary and Secondary Contact Recreation uses. Objectionable conditions in some segments caused the Aesthetics use to be assessed as impaired. Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report 72 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 N Boston Harbor Watershed Weymouth Holbrook Avon Custom % Mixing South Coastal Avon Cleveland Watershed Pond Waldo Abington Rockland Lake Stoughton MA62-07 MA62-33 M MA62-46 A 62 - 08 Brockton Whitman MA62-09 Pembroke MA62-05 MA62-38 MA62-34 % East MA62-06 Bridgewater Hanson Brockton East Bridgewater Public Schools AWRF % West Bridgewater M A6 2- 10 Monponsett Robins Plymouth Pond MA62-32 Pond Street Pond Halifax Bridgewater 2 0 2 4 Miles LEGEND Subwatersheds: % NPDES Permitted Facility Lovett Brook (MA62-46) Segments Salisbury Brook (MA62-08) Other Surface Waters Trout Brook (MA62-07) Salisbury Plain River (MA62-05) Town Boundaries Salisbury Plain River (MA62-06) Taunton River Watershed Outli ne Beaver Brook (MA62-09) Meadow Brook (MA62-38) Shumatuscacant River (MA62-33) Poor Meadow Brook (MA62-34) Satucket River (MA62-10) Matfield River (MA62-32) Figure 9. Matfield River Subwatershed Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report 73 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 LOVETT BROOK (SEGMENT MA62-46) Location: Headwaters north of Oak Street, Brockton to inlet Ellis Brett Pond, Brockton. Segment Length: 1.5 miles Classification: B N The drainage area of this segment is approximately 2.2 AVON square miles. Land-use estimates (top three) for the STOUGHTON subwatershed: Residential..... 37.0% Inlet to Forest ........... 27.5% Ellis Brett Pond Commercial ... 12.1% Headwaters The impervious cover area for this subwatershed is 29.3%. # ESS LB1 WMA WATER WITHDRAWAL SUMMARY AND NPDES WASTEWATER DISCHARGE SUMMARY EASTON 1 0 1 Miles BROCKTON Based on available information there are no WMA withdrawals or NPDES dischargers in this subwatershed. Lovett Brook MA62-46 USE ASSESSMENT # Sample Station AQUATIC LIFE Segment Habitat and Flow Surface Water Using MassDEP guidelines, ESS conducted a habitat Subwatershed assessment in Lovett Brook near D.W. Field Park Drive, Town Boundaries Brockton (Station LB1) during the summer of 2002. The Taunton River Watershed Outline overall habitat assessment score was 136/200. Instream cover for fish and epifaunal substrate was somewhat limited as was channel flow status and velocity/depth combinations. The riparian zone width on both banks was also impacted (ESS 2003). Chemistry – water Between August and November 2002, ESS conducted water quality monitoring in Lovett Brook near D.W. Field Park Drive, Brockton (Station LB1) as part of their NPS study. Results of these surveys are summarized as follows (ESS 2003). Dissolved Oxygen and % Saturation Dissolved oxygen in Lovett Brook near D.W. Field Park Drive, Brockton (Station LB1) ranged from 6.2 to 7.7 mg/L with saturations between 69.3 and 74.7%. It should be noted that these data do not represent pre-dawn sampling conditions. Temperature The maximum temperature recorded in Lovett Brook was 22.4�C. pH The pH ranged from 6.6 to 7.6 SU. Specific Conductance Specific conductance ranged from 227.7 to 706.0 µmhos/cm with the highest measurement during the dry weather survey (1 August 2002). Total Suspended Solids (TSS) The highest concentration of TSS measured in Lovett Brook was 12 mg/L (n=3). Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN) The concentration of TKN in Lovett Brook ranged from 0.5 to 1.3 mg/L (n=3). Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report 74 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 Total Phosphorus Total phosphorus concentrations ranged from 0.02 to 0.15 mg/L. Two of the three measurements were > 0.05 mg/L and were collected during wet weather sampling conditions. The Aquatic Life Use is not assessed for Lovett Brook as a result of the lack of instream biological data (response type indicators of in-stream water quality conditions). This use in this urbanized subwatershed is identified with an Alert Status because of habitat degradation (result of sedimentation) and slightly elevated total phosphorus concentrations. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CONTACT RECREATION AND AESTHETICS Both fecal coliform and E.coli bacteria were collected by ESS from Lovett Brook near D.W.
Recommended publications
  • NPDES Permit No. MA0101010 Page 1 of 23 AUTHORIZATION to DISCHARGE UNDER the NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
    NPDES Permit No. MA0101010 Page 1 of 23 AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, as amended, (33 U.S.C. §§1251 et seq.; the "CWA"), and the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, as amended, (M.G.L. Chap. 21, §§ 26-53), City of Brockton is authorized to discharge from the facility located at Brockton Advanced Water Reclamation Facility 303 Oak Hill Way Brockton, Massachusetts 02301 to receiving water named Salisbury Plain River in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth herein. The Towns of Abington and Whitman are co-permittees for Parts 1.B. Unauthorized Discharges and 1.C. Operation and Maintenance of the Sewer System, which include conditions regarding the operation and maintenance of the collection systems owned and operated by the Towns. The responsible Town authorities are: Town of Abington Town of Whitman Sewer Department Department of Public Works 350 Summer Street 100 Essex Street, P.O. Box 454 Abington, MA 02351 Whitman, MA 02382 This permit will become effective on the first day of the calendar month immediately following sixty days after signature.* This permit expires at midnight, five (5) years from the last day of the month preceding the effective date. This permit supersedes the permit issued on May 11, 2005. This permit consists of Part I (23 pages including effluent limitations and monitoring requirements); Attachment A (USEPA Region 1 Freshwater Chronic Toxicity Test Procedure and Protocol, March 2013); Attachment B (USEPA Region 1 Freshwater Acute Toxicity Test Procedure and Protocol, February 2011); Attachment C (USEPA Region 1 Reassessment of Technically Based Industrial Discharge Limits); Attachment D (USEPA Region 1 NPDES Permit Requirement for Industrial Pretreatment Annual Report) and Part II (25 pages including NPDES Part II Standard Conditions).
    [Show full text]
  • NVD-A211) Detailed City Coverage by State
    Smart Map Pro DVD Version 2.0 (NVD-A211) Detailed City Coverage By State Gilbert American Canyon Alabama: Glendale Anaheim Goodyear Angwin Argo Guadalupe Antelope Bessemer Higley Antelope Acres Birmingham Laveen Antioch Brighton Liberty Apple Valley Brookside Litchfield Park Aptos Brookwood Luke Air Force Base Arcadia Cardiff Marana Arlanza County Line Mesa Arlington Fairfield Oro Valley Arlington Station Fultondale Paradise Valley Arnold Heights Gardendale Peoria Aromas Graysville Phoenix Arrowhead Highlands Homewood Queen Creek Arrowhead Springs Hoover Rio Verde Arroyo Grande Hueytown Scottsdale Artesia Huntsville Sedona Ashland Irondale South Tucson Asti Kimberly Sun City Atascadero Leeds Sun City West Athens Lipscomb Sun Lakes Atherton Maytown Surprise Atwater Midfield Tempe Atwood Morris Tolleson Aurant Mountain Brook Tucson Avalon Mulga Waddell Avon North Johns Youngtown Azusa Northport Bahia Pleasant Grove California: Bakersfield Sumiton Balboa Island Sylvan Springs Acton Baldwin Park Tarrant Adelanto Banning Trafford Agoura Bardsdale Trussville Agoura Hills Barona Tuscaloosa Agua Caliente Batavia Vance Agua Dulce Bay Farm Island Vestavia Heights Alameda Bay Park Warrior Alamo Beaumont West Jefferson Albany Bel Air Aldercroft Heights Bel Marin Keys Arizona: Alhambra Bell Aliso Viejo Bell Gardens Apache Junction Allendale Bellflower Avondale Allied Gardens Belmont Carefree Alpine Belmont Shore Cave Creek Alpine Heights Belvedere Chandler Alta Loma Belvedere Heights Chandler Heights Altadena Belvedere-Tiburon El Mirage Alum Rock
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 1.14 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001
    APPENDIX A TAUNTON RIVER WATERSHED DWM YEAR 2001 WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA Technical Memorandum TM-62-6 DWM Control Number: 94.1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE JR., COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report Appendix A A1 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................A3 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................................A3 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................A4 Survey Conditions...........................................................................................................................A12 Water Quality Data .........................................................................................................................A17 References Cited ............................................................................................................................A34 Appendix 1 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Validation .......................................................A35 Appendix 2 - 2001 Data Symbols and Qualifiers ..............................................................................A42
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Names of Places in Plymouth Middleborough Lakeville and Carver Plymouth County Massachusetts with Interpretations of Some
    ' Ma ssasoz t To the [a nd of , O n the h ills of Pometacom , ’ B th t a m of ua d a y e s re s Q equ zn , Th rou h the woods of ueen Weeta moo g Q , i o wi d u If y ou w ll , th is bo k ll lea y o . INTR OD UCTION Y object in collecting some of the Indian Place Name s attem ti n translation of Plymouth County and p g their , is the wish to create an interest in the use of Indian names in New England . A lthough of the following comparatively small collection , Massachu setts records deeds few can be used , the early and Names contain innumerable Indian Place , many of which are h nk more euphonious . T e Algo in language p ossesses also many describ e euphonious words , which will some natural character istic of almost any locality . We scarcely realize that this whole country was once n eo le whose nk i habited by a p p history is almost u nown , but whos e h i c aracteristics , and traditions , and myths , and rel gions ofier re s ects n , in some p , almost as wide a field for i teresting stud t n y and for research , as the myths and raditio s of the races of the old world . I am speaking of the race before it hi was corrupted b y European influences . T s is not a country v of without a past , and much may yet be re ealed great interest to the historian .
    [Show full text]
  • Malaclemys Terrapin) in Taunton River Watershed Report
    Population of Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) in Taunton River Watershed Report 7 November 2018 Prepared By George Bancroft Taunton River Watershed Alliance, INC. 1 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....3 Scope of Work…………………………………………………………………………………………………………....3 Methods………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 Trapping……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......4 Sampling Strategy……………………………………………………………………………………………………...8 Processing and Data Collection………………………………………………………………………………....13 Nest Protection………………………………………………………………………………………………………..13 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…….18 Discussion and Management Implications………………………………………………………………..25 Limitations of the Results…………………………………………………………………………………………25 Recommendations for Future Study…………………………………………………………………………26 Literature Cited………………………………………………………………………………………………………....27 Appendices………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..28 1. Data collected from all Terrapins captured……………………………………………………………….28 2. Shell measurements, mass, and location for all hatchling turtles……………….……………….30 3. List of preparers (including field personnel) and their resumes/vitae…………………..…....31 4. Copies of all completed project data sheets 5. Photos of each turtle captured (located on USB flash drive) 2 Introduction The Diamondback Terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) is a brackish water turtle species found from Southeastern Massachusetts and Cape Cod south to Florida and west along the Gulf Coast to Corpus Christi, Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters
    Massachusetts Year 2012 Integrated List of Waters Final Listing of the Condition of Massachusetts’ Waters Pursuant to Sections 305(b), 314 and 303(d) of the Clean Water Act Featuring new water quality assessments for the Blackstone, Boston Harbor (including Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth/Weir), Merrimack and Parker watersheds and the Cape Cod coastal drainage areas Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Secretary Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Kenneth L. Kimmell, Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Bethany A. Card, Assistant Commissioner Massachusetts Category 5 Waters "Waters requiring a TMDL" EPA NAME SEGMENT ID DESCRIPTION SIZE UNITS IMPAIRMENT CAUSE TMDL NO. Lee River MA61-01 From confluence with Lewin Brook, Swansea to 0.02 SQUARE Fecal Coliform 38905 Route 6, Swansea/Somerset MILES Nutrient/Eutrophication Biological Indicators Lee River MA61-02 Route 6, Swansea/Somerset to mouth at Mount 0.51 SQUARE (Debris/Floatables/Trash*) Hope Bay, Swansea/Somerset MILES Chlorophyll-a Fecal Coliform 38906 Nitrogen (Total) Oxygen, Dissolved Taste and Odor Mount Hope Bay MA61-06 the Massachusetts portion from the Braga Bridge, 2.29 SQUARE Chlorophyll-a Fall River/Somerset to the state border Fall River, MILES Fecal Coliform 38908 MA/Tiverton, RI to the line from Braton Point Somerset to MA/RI border approximately 3/4 of a Fishes Bioassessments mile due east of Spar Island, RI Nitrogen (Total) Temperature, water Mount Hope Bay MA61-07 the Massachusetts
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts
    Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts By JOSEPH H. HARTSHORN GEOLOGY OF SELECTED QUADRANGLES IN MASSACHUSETTS v -GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1163-D Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' Department of Public ff^orks ,UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS ' Page Abstract__ ____-_____-_---___________----__---_----___-------_--- Dl Introduction._ ___-___----____________---_----_------_-------______ 1 Acknowledgments. __.._________,.______-_-_-___-___--______-___ 2 General setting.._.---_____________-_-___'__________-.__________ 2 Pre-Pleistocene geology and history._________________________________ 2 Stratigraphy._______________________----_--------_---_-.______ 3 Structure._______-----____________---------_-----_----____.___ 6 Geologic history._-_-_--__________----_-----_-----_--_-________ 7 Pleistocene geology____-_-_____-_______--__------___-__---_-_______ 8 Glacial erosion._______________________________________________ 8 Glacial deposits.__-_-_.-_______-___---------_---_-_------_.____ 9 Till..---------------------------------------------------- 9 Field and laboratory data..____________________________ 11 * Ground moraine.-.-----------^-------------------- 12 Flowtill. _-______-.-.---------.--------.....-...-_ 19 Textural data.____________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer
    Bird Observer VOLUME 39, NUMBER 2 APRIL 2011 HOT BIRDS On November 20 the Hampshire Bird Club was waiting at Quabbin headquarters for the rest of the group to arrive when Larry Therrien spotted a flock of 19 swans in the distance— Tundra Swans! Ian Davies took this photograph (left). Since 2003 Cave Swallows have been a specialty of November, showing up in coastal locations in increasing numbers over the years. This year there was a flurry of reports along the New England coast. On Thanksgiving Day, Margo Goetschkes took this photograph (right) of one of the birds at Salisbury. On November 30, Vern Laux got a call from a contractor reporting a “funny bird” at the Nantucket dump. Vern hustled over and was rewarded with great views of this Fork-tailed Flycatcher (left). Imagine: you’re photographing a Rough- legged Hawk in flight, and all of a sudden it is being mobbed—by a Northern Lapwing (right)! That’s what happened to Jim Hully on December 2 on Plum Island. This is only the second state record for this species, the first being in Chilmark in December of 1996. On April 9, Keelin Miller found an interesting gull at Kalmus Beach in Hyannis. As photographs were circulated, opinions shifted toward a Yellow-legged Gull (left). Check out Jeremiah Trimble’s photo from April 13. CONTENTS BIRDING THE LAKEVILLE PONDS OF PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS Jim Sweeney 73 THE FINAL YEAR OF THE BREEDING BIRD ATLAS: GOING OVER THE TOP John Galluzzo 83 37 YEARS OF NIGHTHAWKING Tom Gagnon 86 LEIF J ROBINSON: MAY 21, 1939 – FEBRUARY 28, 2011 Soheil Zendeh 93 FIELD NOTES Double-crested Cormorant Has Trouble Eating a Walking Catfish William E.
    [Show full text]
  • Mansfield, MA
    Mansfield, MA Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) and Community Resilience Building Workshop Summary of Findings January 2019 Submitted by: Overview Mansfield is a town of over 23,000 residents in northwestern Bristol County, MA. Its neighboring towns include Easton to the east, Sharon to the northeast, Foxboro to the north, North Attleboro to the west, Attleboro to the southwest, and Norton to the south (see map from Mansfield’s 2017 Open Space Plan). It is located about 28 miles south of Boston, 14 miles from Brockton, and 19 miles from Providence, Rhode Island. This inland community has collaborated with neighboring towns to steward shared natural resources, namely through the Canoe River Aquifer Advisory Committee (CRAAC). Much of Mansfield is low‐lying, and its proximity to critical water bodies like the Canoe River and Rumford River makes effective household and municipal water management systems important. The increasing severity of the regional flood‐drought cycle is noted as a top concern to many residents. Regionally unique ecosystems like the Great Woods offer multiple benefits to the surrounding community and must be actively preserved against climate hazards. In addition to the flood‐drought cycle, heavy precipitation, high winds, and extreme temperatures have severely impacted Mansfield’s various assets. The town sees collaborative planning as the most effective way to ensure the future safety of town residents, and the protection of critical shared resources. This value of collaboration is seen in Mansfield’s leadership as part of an emerging regional group of open space experts working to coordinate conservation efforts. To help the town consider and prioritize actions to improve its climate resilience, the Town of Mansfield applied for and received a grant from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) to become a Designated Municipal Vulnerability Preparedness (MVP) Community.
    [Show full text]
  • Plymouth County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 3 OF 5 PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 PRELIMINARY: APRIL 18, 2018 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV003D Version Number 2.3.3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 5 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 17 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 17 2.2 Floodways 34 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 35 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 35 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 35 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 35 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 37 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 38 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 39 SECTION 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Srpedd Annual Report
    SRPEDD 2021ANNUAL REPORT The Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District plans for the future of our region - for efficient transportation networks, wise land use and housing choices, expansion of economic opportunity, protection of natural and historic resources, and development of excellent physical and cultural amenities. ANNUAL REPORT 2021 Contents 03 Letters to the Region 04 Transportation Planning 12 Comprehensive Planning 16 Technical Assistance Overview 18 Economic Development 20 Environmental Planning 26 Homeland Security 29 Treasurer’s Report 30 The SRPEDD Commission 31 The Staff Cover image: Padanaram Bridge, Dartmouth by Kevin Ham It is the policy of the Southeastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District (SRPEDD) to uphold and assure full compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 13166, Executive Order 12898, and related federal and state statutes and regulations. SRPEDD also upholds the Massachusetts Public Accommodation Law, M.G.L. c 272 §§92a, 98, 98a, and the Governor’s Executive Order 526, section 4. For a complete policy statement, please visit http://www.srpedd.org/title-vi-compliance. 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2021 Letters to the Region Chair’s Report Alan Slavin, Commission Chair This has been a Zoom year with virtually no in-person gatherings. I am, nevertheless, amazed at how much SPREDD has been able to accomplish. The organization has continued to grow during the pandemic, adding further highly qualified staff, expanding its core services, and addressing area needs. I have once again felt very privileged to work with such a great group of people: staff and Commissioners; local, state, and federal officials, across the region.
    [Show full text]