IDDE PROGRAM Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program City of Taunton, MA NPDES Small MS4 General Permit

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IDDE PROGRAM Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program City of Taunton, MA NPDES Small MS4 General Permit City of Taunton, MA Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program NPDES Small MS4 General Permit June 2019 IDDE PROGRAM Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program City of Taunton, MA NPDES Small MS4 General Permit IDDE PROGRAM Prepared by: BETA GROUP, INC. Prepared for: City of Taunton June 2019 Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program IDDE Program City of Taunton, MA TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Objective ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Work Completed to Date ................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 Legal Authority and Statement of IDDE Responsibilities ..................................................................... 4 5.0 Receiving Waters and Impairments.................................................................................................... 4 6.0 Prohibitions and Required Actions ..................................................................................................... 7 7.0 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges .............................................................................................. 7 8.0 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) ....................................................................................................... 8 9.0 Stormwater System Mapping ............................................................................................................. 9 9.1 Phase I Mapping....................................................................................................................... 9 9.2 Phase II Mapping...................................................................................................................... 9 10.0 Outfall and Interconnection Inventory ........................................................................................... 10 11.0 Initial Ranking of Outfalls and Interconnections ............................................................................. 10 12.0 Dry Weather Outfall and Interconnection Screening and Sampling ................................................ 11 12.1 Weather Conditions ................................................................................................................... 11 12.2 General Procedure for Dry Weather Outfall Screening/Sampling ............................................... 12 12.2 Interpreting Results ................................................................................................................... 12 13.0 Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Source Identification Report ................................................ 13 14.0 Follow-up Ranking of Outfalls and Interconnections ...................................................................... 14 15.0 Catchment Investigations............................................................................................................... 14 15.1 System vulnerability Identification ............................................................................................. 14 15.2 Dry weather Key Junction Manhole Inspections ......................................................................... 15 15.3 Wet Weather Investigation ........................................................................................................ 16 16.0 Identification/Confirmation of Illicit Source.................................................................................... 16 17.0 Illicit discharge removal ................................................................................................................. 17 18.0 Ongoing Screening ......................................................................................................................... 17 19.0 Training ......................................................................................................................................... 17 20.0 Citizen Call in Reports .................................................................................................................... 18 21.0 Indicators of IDDE Program Progress and Reporting ....................................................................... 18 i Illicit Discharge Detection & Elimination Program IDDE Program City of Taunton, MA LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 IDDE Program Implementation Timeline Table 5-1 City of Taunton Waterbodies and Impairments Table 11-1 Initial Outfall Ranking Results LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Stormwater Outfall Map Appendix B: Outfall & Interconnection Inventory and Priority Ranking Appendix C: IDDE Composite Ranking Map and Sampling Locations Map Appendix D: Screening/Sampling Standard Operating Procedures and Forms Appendix E: IDDE Employee Training Record ii 1.0 OBJECTIVE Taunton has developed this Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) program to systematically find and eliminate potential sources of non-stormwater discharges to its municipal separate storm sewer system and implement procedures to prevent future discharges. This IDDE Plan has been developed to address Minimum Control Measure 3 requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA’s) 2016 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) in Massachusetts, hereafter referred to as the “2016 Massachusetts MS4 Permit” or “MS4 Permit.” The required timeline for implementing the IDDE program is shown in Table 1-1 starting from the effective 2018 date of the NPDES Small MS4 General Permit Number [MAR041164]. Table 1-1 IDDE Program Implementation Timeline Completion Date from Effective Date of MS4 permit IDDE Program Requirements 7 10 1 Year 1.5 Years 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years Years Years Written IDDE Program Plan Complete SSO Inventory Complete Written Catchment Investigation Procedure Complete Phase I Mapping Complete Phase II Mapping (updates & added details) IDDE Regulatory Mechanism or By- law (if not already in place) Complete Dry Weather Outfall Screening Follow-up Ranking of Outfalls and Interconnections Nitrogen and Phosphorus Source Identification Report (Annual Report) Catchment Investigations – Problem Outfalls Catchment Investigations – as needed based on screening and sampling results On-going Screening and Composite Annually Sampling Training Annually To note, the City of Taunton finalized and implemented a Stormwater Management Ordinance in July 2014. 1 2.0 DEFINITIONS The following definitions are provided for terms used in this IDDE Plan. A catchment is the area that drains to an individual outfall or interconnection. Dry weather is when no more than 0.1 inches of rainfall has fallen in a 24-hour period and when significant snow melt has/is occurred. A sanitary sewer overflow (SSO) is a discharge of untreated sanitary wastewater from a municipal sanitary sewer. An illicit discharge is any discharge to a municipal separate storm sewer that is not composed entirely of stormwater, except discharges pursuant to a NPDES permit (other than the NPDES permit for discharges from the municipal separate storm sewer) and discharges resulting from firefighting activities. Illicit discharges may take a variety of forms. Illicit discharges may enter the drainage system through direct or indirect connections. Direct connections may be relatively obvious, such as cross-connections of sewer services to the storm drain system. Indirect illicit discharges may be more difficult to detect or address, such as failing septic systems that discharge untreated sewage to a ditch within the MS4, or a sump pump that discharges contaminated water on an intermittent basis. Some illicit discharges are intentional, such as dumping pollutants). Some illicit discharges are related to the unsuitability of original infrastructure to the modern regulatory environment. Elimination of some discharges may require substantial costs and efforts, such as funding and designing a project to reconnect sanitary sewer laterals. Others, such as improving self-policing of dog waste management, can be accomplished by outreach in conjunction with the minimal additional cost of dog waste bins and the municipal commitment to disposal of collected materials on a regular basis. Regardless of the intention, when not addressed, illicit discharges can contribute high levels of pollutants, such as heavy metals, toxics, oil, grease, solvents, nutrients, and pathogens to surface waters. Interconnection means the point (excluding sheet flow over impervious surfaces) where the permittee’s MS4 discharges to another MS4 or other storm sewer system, through which the discharge is conveyed to waters of the United States or to another storm sewer system and eventually to a water of the United States. Junction Manhole is a manhole or structure with two or more inlets accepting flow from two or more drainage alignments. For the purposes of this report, manholes with inlets solely from individual catch basins are not considered junction manholes. Key junction is a manhole or structure that can represent one or more junction manholes without compromising adequate implementation of the IDDE program. The MATRIX is the Outfall/Interconnection Data and Priority Ranking table MS4 is a municipal separate storm sewer system The MS4 Permit is the
Recommended publications
  • J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President
    J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mr. Bellisle possesses more than 20 years of experience working on a variety of geotechnical, foundation, civil, and dam engineering projects. He has acted as principal-in-charge, project manager, and project engineer for assignments involving geotechnical design, site investigations, testing, instrumentation, and construction monitoring. His experience also includes over 500 Phase I inspections and Phase II design services for earthen and concrete dams. REGISTRATIONS AND Relevant project experience includes: CERTIFICATIONS His experience includes value engineering of alternate foundation systems, Professional Engineer – Massachusetts, ground improvement methodologies, and temporary construction support. Mr. Rhode Island, Bellisle has also developed environmental permit applications and presented at New Hampshire, New York public hearings in support of public and private projects. Dam Engineering PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS): Principal-in- American Society of Civil Charge/Project Manager for various stability analyses and reports to assess Engineers long-term performance of vegetated emergency spillways. Association of State Dam - Hop Brook Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway Safety Officials Evaluation - George H. Nichols Multipurpose Dam – Conceptual Design of an Armored Spillway EDUCATION - Lester G. Ross Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway University of Rhode Island: Evaluation M.S., Civil Engineering 2001 - Cold Harbor Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway B.S., Civil & Environmental Evaluation Engineering, 1992 - Delaney Complex Dams – Emergency Spillway Evaluation PUBLICATIONS AND Hobbs Pond Dam: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for the design PRESENTATIONS and development of construction documents of a new armored auxiliary spillway and new primary spillway to repair a filed embankment and Bellisle, J.M., Chopy, D, increase discharge capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 1.14 MB, for Taunton River Watershed 2001
    APPENDIX A TAUNTON RIVER WATERSHED DWM YEAR 2001 WATER QUALITY MONITORING DATA Technical Memorandum TM-62-6 DWM Control Number: 94.1 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ELLEN ROY HERZFELDER, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE JR., COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Taunton River Watershed 2001 Water Quality Assessment Report Appendix A A1 62wqar.doc DWM CN 94.0 Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................A3 Project Objectives .............................................................................................................................A3 Field and Analytical Methods .............................................................................................................A4 Survey Conditions...........................................................................................................................A12 Water Quality Data .........................................................................................................................A17 References Cited ............................................................................................................................A34 Appendix 1 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control Data Validation .......................................................A35 Appendix 2 - 2001 Data Symbols and Qualifiers ..............................................................................A42
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 2 Report (PDF)
    Project Name: Phase 2 Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan & Final Environmental Impact Report EEA #13388 REPORT Project Location: Mansfield & Norton, Massachusetts Prepared for: Town of Mansfield, Massachusetts Prepared by: CDM Smith 75 State Street, Suite 701 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Date of Filing: June 2015 75 State Street, Suite 701 Boston, Massachusetts 02109 tel: 617 452-6000 June 10, 2015 Mr. Matthew A. Beaton, Secretary Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Attn: MEPA Office 100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114 Subject: Final Environmental Impact Report and Phase 2 Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan, EOEA No. 13388 Town of Mansfield - Proponent Dear Secretary Beaton: On behalf of the Town of Mansfield (Town), CDM Smith Inc. (CDM Smith) submits this Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) and Phase 2 Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan (CWMP) in accordance with the MEPA Regulations. The FEIR responds to the scope of work identified by MEPA and outlined in the Draft EIR Certificate dated November 26, 2014. The recommended wastewater plan includes expansion of the existing Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) located in Norton and construction of wastewater effluent recharge infiltration basins for infiltration of treated wastewater effluent. In addition, the Fruit Street Landfill, located in Mansfield and previously used for sludge and grit disposal from the WPCF, will be capped and closed. The recommended wastewater management plan as described herein requires MEPA review pursuant to Section 11.03(5)(b)(2) and 11.03(5)(4)(d)ii because a 1.0 mgd expansion of the existing WPCF is proposed and effluent recharge greater than 0.5 mgd is proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Observer
    Bird Observer VOLUME 39, NUMBER 2 APRIL 2011 HOT BIRDS On November 20 the Hampshire Bird Club was waiting at Quabbin headquarters for the rest of the group to arrive when Larry Therrien spotted a flock of 19 swans in the distance— Tundra Swans! Ian Davies took this photograph (left). Since 2003 Cave Swallows have been a specialty of November, showing up in coastal locations in increasing numbers over the years. This year there was a flurry of reports along the New England coast. On Thanksgiving Day, Margo Goetschkes took this photograph (right) of one of the birds at Salisbury. On November 30, Vern Laux got a call from a contractor reporting a “funny bird” at the Nantucket dump. Vern hustled over and was rewarded with great views of this Fork-tailed Flycatcher (left). Imagine: you’re photographing a Rough- legged Hawk in flight, and all of a sudden it is being mobbed—by a Northern Lapwing (right)! That’s what happened to Jim Hully on December 2 on Plum Island. This is only the second state record for this species, the first being in Chilmark in December of 1996. On April 9, Keelin Miller found an interesting gull at Kalmus Beach in Hyannis. As photographs were circulated, opinions shifted toward a Yellow-legged Gull (left). Check out Jeremiah Trimble’s photo from April 13. CONTENTS BIRDING THE LAKEVILLE PONDS OF PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS Jim Sweeney 73 THE FINAL YEAR OF THE BREEDING BIRD ATLAS: GOING OVER THE TOP John Galluzzo 83 37 YEARS OF NIGHTHAWKING Tom Gagnon 86 LEIF J ROBINSON: MAY 21, 1939 – FEBRUARY 28, 2011 Soheil Zendeh 93 FIELD NOTES Double-crested Cormorant Has Trouble Eating a Walking Catfish William E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 2 OF 4 BRISTOL COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Bristol County COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACUSHNET, TOWN OF 250048 ATTLEBORO, CITY OF 250049 BERKLEY, TOWN OF 250050 DARTMOUTH, TOWN OF 250051 DIGHTON, TOWN OF 250052 EASTON, TOWN OF 250053 FAIRHAVEN, TOWN OF 250054 FALL RIVER, CITY OF 250055 FREETOWN, TOWN OF 250056 MANSFIELD, TOWN OF 250057 NEW BEDFORD, CITY OF 255216 NORTH ATTLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250059 NORTON, TOWN OF 250060 RAYNHAM, TOWN OF 250061 REHOBOTH, TOWN OF 250062 SEEKONK, TOWN OF 250063 SOMERSET, TOWN OF 255220 SWANSEA, TOWN OF 255221 TAUTON, CITY OF 250066 WESTPORT, TOWN OF 255224 REVISED JULY 16, 2014 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25005CV002B NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Selected Flood Insurance Rate Map panels for the community contain information that was previously shown separately on the corresponding Flood Boundary and Floodway Map panels (e.g., floodways, cross sections). In addition, former flood hazard zone designations have been changed as follows: Old Zone New Zone A1 through A30 AE V1 through V30 VE (shaded) B X C X Part or all of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this Flood Insurance Study may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the Flood Insurance Study.
    [Show full text]
  • Middleborough, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-12_2008 Town River (3) MA62-01_2008 Taunton River (2) TauntonTaunton RiverRiver Kingston 80 South Brook Monponsett Brook Carver Pond Jones River Brook 104 Halifax MA94133_2008 MA62033_2008 Spring Brook Colchester Brook Russell Pond (3) Carver Pond (4c) BartlettBartlett BrookBrook IndianIndian PondPond MA94072_2008 Cranberry Bogs Bridgewater MA62-24_2008 Indian Pond (3) Winnetuxet River (2) Plympton MA62233_2008 Winnetuxet River Winnetuxet River 58 Muddy Pond (3) BeaverBeaver Brook Brook RavenRaven Brook Brook MA62-26_2008 105 Sawmill Brook MA62-36_2008 Nemasket River (2) 44 Sawmill Brook (3) Plymouth Darby Snows Brook Snows Brook Pond MA62132_2008 MA62046_2008North Center Street Pond (3) Beaver Dam Brook MA62-01_2008 Taunton River (2) MA62167_2008 Cooper Pond (2) Wenham Savery Pond (4c) Pond MA62125_2008 Muddy MA95174_2008 Middleborough Pond Fresh Meadow Pond (4c) 18 Muddy Pond (4c) MA62-26_2008 Nemasket River (2) Saverys Pond Pogouy Brook MA62234_2008 MA62096_2008 44 Fuller Street Pond (4c) Johns Pond (2) Carver PuddingshearPuddingshear BrookBrook MA62220_2008 ShortsShorts Brook Brook 28 Woods Pond (5) MA95153_2008 Taunton River Pogouy Vaughn Pond (2) Brook Lake MA62147_2008 Woods SouthSouth MeadowMeadow Brook Brook Nemasket River Poquoy Pond (3) Nemasket River Pond StonyStony Brook Brook MA95139_2008 Raynham MA62148_2008 South Meadow Brook Pond (3) Lake Rico (4c) MA62-25_2008 WoodsWoods Brook Brook Lake Lake Nemasket River (2) Rico MA62115_2008 MA62041_2008 RockyRocky MeadowMeadow Brook Brook 58 Clear Pond (2) Middle Pond (4c)
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment June 2007 National Park Service 1 Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2007 Prepared by National Park Service, Northeast Region In Cooperation with: » Southeast Region Planning and Economic Development District » Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Project Manager: Jamie Fosburgh, Rivers Program Manager, NER-Boston Poject Team: Bill Napolitano Project Leader, SRPEDD Rachel Calabro Principal Author, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, SRPEDD/ MA Riverways Nancy Durfee Outreach & Volunteers, SRPEDD Karen Porter & Maisy McDarby-Stanovich Mapping & Web Page, SRPEDD Special Thanks: Jim Ross Chair, Taunton Wild and Scenic River Study Committee Comments on this Draft Report can be sent to: Jamie Fosburgh National Park Service 15 State Street Boston MA 02109 (617) 223-5191 [email protected] Please visit www.tauntonriver.org for more information and links related to the Wild and Scenic River Study, Wild and Scenic River Study Committee, Taunton River Stewardship Plan, and the Taunton River. Companion Document: Taunton River Stewardship Plan, July 2005 Cover Photo: Rachel Calabro. Broad Cove, Dighton. Table of Contents Taunton Wild and Scenic Rivers Study Draft Report and Environmental Assessment 2-4 Summary of Findings 5-7 Chapter I. 5 Background and Need 8-14 Chapter II. 8 Eligibility and Classification Findings (The Affected Environment) 15-19 Chapter III. 15 Suitability Findings (Management Context) 20-25 Chapter IV. 20 Identification and Comparison of Alternatives 27-35 Maps 28-29 Study Area Map 30-31 Eligibility and Classification Findings 32-33 Alternative B: Full Designation 34-35 Alternative C: Designation to Steep Brook (N.
    [Show full text]
  • (Academy Building) Bridgewater, MA 02324 Patrick Driscoll, Chair Su
    August 25, 2020 Bridgewater Planning Board 66 Central Square (Academy Building) Bridgewater, MA 02324 Patrick Driscoll, Chair Subject: Fruit Street Flex Building Claremont Properties Map 83 Lot 84 Dear Mr. Driscoll et al. The Taunton River Watershed Alliance (TRWA) would like to provide comments on behalf of the watershed on the proposed Flex Building development off Fruit Street currently before the Board. The TRWA does not oppose development however at a loss to why a Planned Development District was so designated in such a sensitive area that includes a Zone II aquifer for Town Raynham wells, the Hockomock Swamp Area of Critical Concern (ACEC) and Lake Nippenicket. For 32 years, TRWA has been a voice for the 562 square mile Taunton River watershed, an advocate for environmental protection, sustainable development, and responsible stewardship of our precious water resources. We are an Alliance of concerned residents, businesses, and organizations united to restore and properly manage water and related natural resources within the Taunton River Watershed. Our mission is to protect and restore the watershed’s natural resources for current and future generations; build and support responsible stewardship of fragile ecosystems, water quality, forests, farmland, and wetlands; provide opportunities for people to enjoy the river and the watershed’s open space; be an integral resource for environmental education and be voice for threatened land and water resources. TRWA, as stated before, doesn’t oppose development especially development in suitable areas however has serious concerns on the effect this project will have on the aquifer and of the Lake Nippenicket resource area. The building itself will cover 103,000 square feet not to mention the parking lot creating a large amount of impermeable surface over the aquifer which requires permeable surface for recharge.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 5 Technical Memo, 1St Draft April 7, 2021
    HOLISTIC WATERSHED MANAGEMENT FOR EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES: OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION FOR LOCAL DECISION MAKERS: PHASE 1 – MODELING AND DEVELOPMENT OF FLOW DURATION CURVES (FDC 1 PROJECT) SUPPORT FOR SOUTHEAST NEW ENGLAND PROGRAM (SNEP) COMMUNICATIONS STRATEGY AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TASK 5 TECHNICAL MEMO 1ST DRAFT APRIL 7, 2021 Prepared for: U.S. EPA Region 1 Prepared by: Paradigm Environmental Great Lakes Environmental Center Blanket Purchase Agreement: BPA-68HE0118A0001-0003 Requisition Number: PR-R1-20-00322 Order: 68HE0121F0001 FDC 1 Project TM 5 April 7, 2021 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Task 5A. Data/Information Assessment .......................................................................................... 1 2.1 Data Review ............................................................................................................................ 1 Landscape Data ............................................................................................................... 1 Dams and Reservoirs ....................................................................................................... 9 Water Use ....................................................................................................................... 9 Meteorology Data ........................................................................................................... 9 Streamflow
    [Show full text]