DOCSLIB.ORG

Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL – October 2007 Ii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL – October 2007 Ii Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission October 24, 2007 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Water Quality and Health Concerns...............................................................................................1 1.2 TMDL Requirements and Process ..................................................................................................1 2 Background Information.........................................................................................................................2 2.1 Fish Consumption Advisories ..........................................................................................................2 2.2 Section 319 Nonpoint Source Assessments and Categorization of Atmospheric Deposition as a Nonpoint Source......................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Massachusetts’ TMDL Alternative and EPA Justification for Disapproval ...............................4 2.4 Section 303(d) Listing for Mercury Impaired Waters – Category 5m.........................................5 2.5 Northeast Regional Commitment to Reducing Regional Sources of Mercury............................6 2.6 Control of In-State Sources not Sufficient to Meet Water Quality Standards............................7 3 Applicable Water Quality Standards and Fish Tissue Criteria...........................................................8 3.1 Assessment of Fish Contaminants ...................................................................................................8 4 Fish Tissue Mercury Concentrations .....................................................................................................9 4.1 Fish Tissue Monitoring Dataset.......................................................................................................9 4.2 Areas of Elevated Concentration...................................................................................................11 5 Northeast Regional Approach...............................................................................................................11 5.1 Impaired Waters .............................................................................................................................11 5.2 Priority Ranking of Impaired Waterbodies .................................................................................12 5.3 Selection of Existing Fish Mercury Concentration Based on Standard Size Fish.....................13 5.4 Target Fish Mercury Concentration.............................................................................................15 5.5 Proportionality of Mercury Reductions........................................................................................16 6 Source Assessment .................................................................................................................................18 6.1 Northeast States Emissions Inventory...........................................................................................18 6.2 Atmospheric Deposition Modeling ................................................................................................22 6.3 Point Sources to Water...................................................................................................................25 7 Development of a Regional Total Maximum Daily Load...................................................................26 7.1 TMDL Formulation ........................................................................................................................26 7.2 Calculation of Existing Total Source Load (TSL)........................................................................27 7.3 Reduction Factor (RF)....................................................................................................................28 7.4 TMDL Calculation..........................................................................................................................29 7.5 Wasteload Allocation (WLA).........................................................................................................29 7.6 Load Allocations..............................................................................................................................30 7.6.1 Load Allocation Calculations..................................................................................................30 7.6.2 Necessary Reductions to Meet LA..........................................................................................31 7.7 Margin of Safety..............................................................................................................................33 7.8 Seasonal Variation and Critical Conditions .................................................................................34 7.9 Daily Load........................................................................................................................................34 8 Final TMDL............................................................................................................................................34 9 Implementation ......................................................................................................................................35 Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL – October 2007 ii 9.1 State and Regional Implementation ..............................................................................................35 9.1.1 Implementation of Wasteload Allocation ..............................................................................35 9.1.2 Adaptive Implementation of Load Allocation .......................................................................36 9.2 Adaptive National Implementation ...............................................................................................38 10 Reasonable Assurances........................................................................................................................39 10.1 State Level Assurances .................................................................................................................39 10.2 National and International Assurances.......................................................................................44 11 Public Participation .............................................................................................................................45 12 References.............................................................................................................................................47 Appendix A: Northeast Waters Impaired Primarily by Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury .........50 Appendix B: Necessary Reductions to meet Water Quality Standards in Maine and Connecticut..57 Appendix C: Mean Mercury Concentrations at NPDES-Permitted Facilities Used in Calculating the Baseline Point Source Load......................................................................................................................66 Appendix D: State Mercury Reduction Plans ........................................................................................72 Appendix E: Response to Comments ......................................................................................................73 Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL – October 2007 iii Tables Table ES-1 Summary of Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL………………………………………......viii Table 2-1 Summary of Statewide Fish Consumption Advisories for Freshwaters………………………...3 Table 3-1 Water Quality Criteria and Fish Consumption Advisory Values for Mercury…………..……...8 Table 4-1 Number of Fillet Mercury Samples Included and Mean Length-Standardized Mercury Concentration for Fish Species Analyzed in the NERC Dataset…...…………………………………..…10 Table 4-2 Standard Lengths and Mercury Concentrations of Selected Freshwater Fish Species in the Northeast…………………………………………………………………………………………………..10
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
    DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Quaboag and Quacumqausit
    Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS STEPHEN R. PRITCHARD, SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE Jr., COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION MARY GRIFFIN, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT GLENN HAAS, DIRECTOR Total Maximum Daily Loads of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag & Quacumquasit Ponds DEP, DWM TMDL Final Report MA36130-2005-1 CN 216.1 May 16, 2006 Location of Quaboag & Quacumquasit Pond within Chicopee Basin in Massachusetts. NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street Worcester, MA 01608 This report is also available from DEP’s home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963- (current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constituted neither endorsement nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Front Cover Photograph of the flow gate at Quacumquasit Pond, East Brookfield. Total Maximum Daily Load of Total Phosphorus for Quaboag and Quacumquasit Ponds 2 Executive Summary The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) is responsible for monitoring the waters of the Commonwealth, identifying those waters that are impaired, and developing a plan to bring them back into compliance with the Massachusetts Surface Water Quality Standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions to 314 CMR 4.00 (Tables and Figures, Clean)
    Please see the 314 CMR 4.00 Summary and Notice to Reviewers document, as well as the Fact Sheets on particular topics for additional information and explanatory detail associated with these proposed regulatory changes. These documents are available on the MassDEP Website. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES* TABLE & TABLE AND CORRESPONDING FIGURE TITLE Page # FIGURE # A (Figure only) River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas TF-2 1 Blackstone River Basin TF-3 2 Boston Harbor Drainage Area (formerly Boston Harbor Drainage System and Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth & Weir River Basins) TF-8 3 Buzzards Bay Coastal Drainage Area TF-17 4 Cape Cod Coastal Drainage Area TF-22 5 Charles River Basin TF-30 6 Chicopee River Basin TF-34 7 Connecticut River Basin TF-40 8 Deerfield River Basin TF-49 9 Farmington River Basin TF-58 10 French River Basin TF-60 11 Housatonic River Basin TF-62 12 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish) TF-70 13 Ipswich River Basin TF-76 14 Islands Coastal Drainage Area (formerly Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket) TF-79 15 Merrimack River Basin TF-81 16 Millers River Basin TF-86 17 Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Drainage Area TF-90 18 Nashua River Basin TF-93 19 North Coastal Drainage Area TF-103 20 Parker River Basin TF-109 21 Quinebaug River Basin TF-113 22 Shawsheen River Basin TF-116 23 South Coastal Drainage Area TF-118 24 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord (SuAsCo) River Basin (formerly Concord) TF-123 25 Taunton River Basin TF-128 26 Ten Mile River Basin TF-132 27 Westfield River Basin TF-134 28 (Table only) Site-Specific Criteria TF-144 29 (Table only) GenerallyApplicable Criteria: 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • Wenham Great Pond
    Wenham Great Pond BY JOHJV C. PHILLIPS SALEM PEABODY MUSEUM Copyright, 1938, by The Peabody Museum, Salem, Massachusetts Printed by The Southworth-A nthoensen Press, Portland, Maine \VEN HAM GREAT POND MosT of the source material for this book was collected for me by Mr.Arthur C. Pickering of Salem in 1913. He had access to the town records of Wenham and Beverly, the libraries of Boston, Salem and Beverly, the files of the Salem Register, Water Board Records) the Registry of Deeds in Salem) etc.) etc. He talked with various of the older men of that time) Mr. John Robinson of Salem, Mr. Robert S. Rantoul (author of the paper on Wenham Lake from which I quote largely), Alonzo Galloupe of Beverly) Mr. William Porter) then town clerk of Wenham) Mr. George E. Woodbury of the Beverly Historical Society) and others. For a good many years these notes of Mr. Pickering's lay around my desk) but in 1933 they were used to prepare an article on Wen­ ham Lake) partly historical) partly dealing with the water short­ age) which appeared in the Salem Evening News in March and April of that year. Ahead of us lies 1943, when Wenham will celebrate her three hundredth anniversary, and it seems possible that a collection of notes such as these) dealing with one of our best known "Great Ponds)" might be acceptable )for the lives of the earlier people must always have centered around this beautiful lake. I was greatly disappointed, at the time we were looking up the history of the lake) to find so few references to it, almost nothing of Indian l()re, of the fisheries and wild lift, or the earliest settlers.
    [Show full text]
  • Taunton, MA Waterbody Assessment, 305(B)/303(D)
    MA62-10_2008 MA62-22_2008 MA62-32_2008 Matfield River (5) Satucket River (2) Coweeset Brook (3) 106 West 28 123 MA62-13_2008 Bridgewater Town River (3) Mansfield Easton MA62106_2008 MA62-12_2008 MA62-13_2008 Hockomock River Little Cedar Swamp (3) Town River (3) Town River (3) MA62203_2008 Town Black Brook River Fuller Hammond Ward Pond (3) MA62-35_2008 TownTown RiverRiver Pond Hockomock River (3) MA62134_2008 MA62158_2008 MA62-11_2008 Norton Reservoir (5) Reservoir (3) Town River (3) MA62-27_2008 South Brook 138 South Brook Canoe River (2) MA62-31_2008 Mulberry Meadow Brook (3) Carver Canoe River Pond MA62033_2008 Norton MA62213_2008 Carver Pond (4c) Reservoir Winnecunnet Pond (4c) MA62131_2008 Norton Lake Nippenicket (4c) (TMDL) 140 Bridgewater Winnecunnet MA62-28_2008 Lake 18 Pond Nippenicket MA62-40_2008 Snake River (3) 495 Rumford River Rumford River Rumford River (2) Watson Sawmill Brook SnowsBrook 104 SnowsBrook Pond MA62007_2008 MA62-56_2008 MA62-36_2008 Barrowsville Pond (3) Three Mile River (5) MA62166_2008 MA62088_2008 Sawmill Brook (3) Barrowsville MA62084_2008 MA62205_2008 Lake Sabbatia (5) Hewitt Pond (3) Gushee PondMA62-49_2008 Pond Gushee Pond (4c) Watson Pond (5) Otis Pratt Brook Wading River (5) Meadow Sabbatia Lake Kings Brook Pond Prospect Hill MA62101_2008 Pond Pond MA62228_2008 Mill Kings Pond (3) 24 MA62113_2008 River Johnson Bassett Brook Whittenton Impoundment (4c) Pond Meadow Brook Pond (3) MA62149_2008 Birch Brook Prospect Hill Pond (3) MA62097_2008 Middleborough MA62-56_2008 Three Mile River (5) MA62136_2008
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES Lakesmart Program
    Partnership Opportunities for Lake-Friendly Living Service Providers NH LAKES LakeSmart Program Only with YOUR help will New Hampshire’s lakes remain clean and healthy, now and in the future. The health of our lakes, and our enjoyment of these irreplaceable natural resources, is at risk. Polluted runoff water from the landscape is washing into our lakes, causing toxic algal blooms that make swimming in lakes unsafe. Failing septic systems and animal waste washed off the land are contributing bacteria to our lakes that can make people and pets who swim in the water sick. Toxic products used in the home, on lawns, and on roadways and driveways are also reaching our lakes, poisoning the water in some areas to the point where fish and other aquatic life cannot survive. NH LAKES has found that most property owners don’t know how their actions affect the health of lakes. We’ve also found that property owners want to do the right thing to help keep the lakes they enjoy clean and healthy and that they often need help of professional service providers like YOU! What is LakeSmart? The LakeSmart program is an education, evaluation, and recognition program that inspires property owners to live in a lake- friendly way, keeping our lakes clean and healthy. The program is free, voluntary, and non-regulatory. Through a confidential evaluation process, property owners receive tailored recommendations about how to implement lake-friendly living practices year-round in their home, on their property, and along and on the lake. Property owners have access to a directory of lake- friendly living service providers to help them adopt lake-friendly living practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water Quality Data for Public and Semi-Public Beaches
    Massachusetts Freshwater Beaches [2018]: Water quality data for public and semi-public beaches The table below summarizes testing and posting information for each freshwater beach in Massachusetts. Under the state regulations, freshwater beaches must test for either E. coli or Enterococci. Most beaches do not have to post after each exceedance, provided that (1) they take an immediate resample and (2) that resample does not exceed the standard. Thus, a beach may have an exceedance but no days posted. Conversely, a beach may have days posted, but no exceedances, if it was posted for a reason other than a bacterial exceedance (e.g. rainfall, a cyanobacterial harmful algae bloom, or another hazard such as limited visibility due to poor water clarity). Single Minimum Maximum Testing Days Community Beach Name Tests Indicator Sample Exceedance Exceedance Frequency Posted Exceedances (cfu/100mL) (cfu/100mL) Abington Island Grove Beach Weekly 12 E. coli 3 236 312 3 Acton NARA Beach Weekly 16 E. coli Agawam Robinson Pond Beach (DCR) Weekly 15 Enterococci Amesbury Camp Bauercrest Weekly 10 E. coli Amesbury Glen Devin Condominiums Weekly 11 E. coli 2 261 1553 14 Amesbury Lake Attitash - A.L.S.I.A. Weekly 11 E. coli Amesbury Lake Gardner Weekly 11 E. coli 1 261 261 7 Amesbury Tuxbury RV Resort Lagoon Weekly 11 E. coli Amherst Puffers Pond (North) Weekly 17 E. coli 4 240 1986.3 8 Amherst Puffers Pond (South) Weekly 18 E. coli 4 285.1 1986.3 8 Andover Camp Maude Eaton (1) Weekly 11 E. Coli Andover Camp Maude Eaton (2) Weekly 11 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report
    IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT 20173509.001A JUNE 19, 2017 This project has been financed partially with State Capital Funds from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the Department) under a Sustainable Water Management Initiative Grant. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. TOWN OF DANVERS TOWN OF MIDDLETON TOWN OF HAMILTON LYNNFIELD CENTER WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF TOPSFIELD TOWN OF WENHAM WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: The Town of Danvers, MA In partnership with: Town of Middleton, MA Town of Hamilton, MA Lynnfield Center Water District Town of Topsfield, MA Town of Wenham, MA IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT Prepared by: Kirsten N. Ryan, P.G.(NH) Project Manager; Principal Hydrogeologist Reviewed by: Elizabeth C. Frederick Principal Planner KLEINFELDER 215 First Street, Suite 320 Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617.497.7800 Fax: 617.498.4630 June 19, 2017 20173509.001A WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page i of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS to be added WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page ii of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment
    VERMONT RIVER CONSERVANCY: Upper Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Strategic Assessment Prepared for The Vermont River Conservancy. 29 Main St. Suite 11 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 Prepared by Noah Pollock 55 Harrison Ave Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 540-0319 • Noah.Pollock@gmail.com Updated May 12th, 2009 CONNECTICUT RIVER WATER TRAIL STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................................................2 Results of the Stakeholder Review and Analysis .............................................................................5 Summary of Connecticut River Paddler's Trail Planning Documents .........................................9 Campsite and Access Point Inventory and Gap Analysis .............................................................14 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................29 Appendix A: Connecticut River Primitive Campsites and Access Meeting Notes ...................32 Appendix B: Upper Valley Land Trust Campsite Monitoring Checklist ....................................35 Appendix C: Comprehensive List of Campsites and Access Points .........................................36 Appendix D: Example Stewardship Signage .................................................................................39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Northern Forest Canoe Trail Railroad Trestle ................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacteria Monitoring Perspectives from Region 1
    Cyanobacteria Monitoring Perspectives from Region 1 NWQMC WEBINAR SERIES TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2016 HILARY SNOOK USEPA REGION 1 LABORATORY Today’s Talk Basic approach Methods and tools employed Addressing data Why the Need? A request from states No clear picture A moving target A need at multiple levels Educational Data need/modeling Resource management tool Risk/vulnerability UNH What Must it Encompass Multi-tiered with ability for technical expansion Low budget but technically sound Easily implemented Regionally consistency (standardized methods) New information at multiple levels Educational/Informative Utility for resource management applications Address ambient waters (preemptive) and bloom conditions Commensurate QA Workgroup Participants VTDEC Massachusetts Charles River Watershed Association Lake Champlain Basin Monitoring Program University of Rhode Island Watershed Watch NHDES Volunteer Monitoring Network Partnership NHDES Beaches/Lakes Program New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission NHDES Drinking Water Program USEPA Atlantic Ecology Division University of New Hampshire CFB CTDEEP Ambient Monitoring Program University of New Hampshire Extension Office CT Federation of Lakes Lebanon NH PWS USEPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division Manchester NH PWS USGS Merideth NH PWS Lim-Tex, LLC Pennichuck Water Works NH Eastern Analytical, Inc. Wakefield New Hampshire Lakes Collaborative Penobscot Nation Maine DEP Lakes Program Individual Citizen Scientists Maine Dover-Foxcroft Water
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts
    Geology of the Taunton "Quadrangle, Bristol and Plymouth Counties Massachusetts By JOSEPH H. HARTSHORN GEOLOGY OF SELECTED QUADRANGLES IN MASSACHUSETTS v -GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1163-D Prepared in cooperation with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts ' Department of Public ff^orks ,UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1967 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS ' Page Abstract__ ____-_____-_---___________----__---_----___-------_--- Dl Introduction._ ___-___----____________---_----_------_-------______ 1 Acknowledgments. __.._________,.______-_-_-___-___--______-___ 2 General setting.._.---_____________-_-___'__________-.__________ 2 Pre-Pleistocene geology and history._________________________________ 2 Stratigraphy._______________________----_--------_---_-.______ 3 Structure._______-----____________---------_-----_----____.___ 6 Geologic history._-_-_--__________----_-----_-----_--_-________ 7 Pleistocene geology____-_-_____-_______--__------___-__---_-_______ 8 Glacial erosion._______________________________________________ 8 Glacial deposits.__-_-_.-_______-___---------_---_-_------_.____ 9 Till..---------------------------------------------------- 9 Field and laboratory data..____________________________ 11 * Ground moraine.-.-----------^-------------------- 12 Flowtill. _-______-.-.---------.--------.....-...-_ 19 Textural data.____________________________________
    [Show full text]