DOCSLIB.ORG

WEST NEWBURY TRAINING FIELD Where Newbury Men Trained for the Revolutionary War and West Newbury Men Trained for the Civil War ANNUAL STATEMENT of the RECEIPTS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WEST NEWBURY TRAINING FIELD Where Newbury Men Trained for the Revolutionary War and West Newbury Men Trained for the Civil War ANNUAL STATEMENT of the RECEIPTS WEST NEWBURY TRAINING FIELD Where Newbury men trained for the Revolutionary War and West Newbury men trained for the Civil War ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES OF THE Together with the Reports of the School Committee, Board of Engineers, Trustees of the Public Library, Assessors, Auditor, Treasurer and Collector and the Statistics of the Town Clerk. Printed by ~ NEWBURYPORT P11Ess, INc. lln )mlemnrhnn Harold T. Daley January 8, 1911 December 9, 1977 Selectman Assessor Board of Public Welfare Board of Health 1936-1938 Selectman Assessor Board of Public Welfare Board of Health 1951-1956 Member of First Water Board 1936 DIRECTORY OF TOWN OFFICERS BOARD OF SELECTMEN Stephen F. Burke, Jr., Chairman, 1978 Ann S. Reilly, 1979 Albert E. Elwell, 1980 BOARD OF PUBLIC HEAL TH Albert E. Elwell, Chairman, 1980 Stephen F. Burke, Jr., 1978 Ann S. Reilly, 1979 BOARD OF ASSESSORS Dorothea B. Crowley, Chairman, 1978 George E. Schofield, 1979 Steven W. Cashman, 1980 MODERATOR William A. Cook, 1979 TOWN TREASURER AND TAX COLLECTOR Norman H. Hobson, 1979 TOWN CLERK Norman H. Hobson, 1980 SCHOOL COMMITTEE William P. Bannister, Chairman, 1980 Louis A. Porcelli, 1978 Wayne G. Maglione, 1979 Barbara M. Wells, 1979 Gunter Waehling, 1980 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS Charles D. Courtemanche, Chairman, 1979 Edward Vansickle, 1978 David Jennell, 1980 CONSTABLES Charles b. Courtemanche, 1980 Wilbert H. Thompson, 1980 Eugene M. Willis, Jr., 1980 BOARD OF TRUSTEES G.A.R. MEMORIAL LIBRARY David D. Hindle, Chairman, 1979 Ann S. Lape, Recording Secretary, 1978 J. Jackson George, 1979 Philip J. Crowley, 1980 Hugh F. Cawley, 1978 Sarkis M. Kurkjian, 1980 Leah Mingo, 1980 Jean A. Berkenbush, 1978 Esther D. Thurlow, 1979 3 PLANNING BOARD Malcolm S. Burr, Chairman, 1978 Richard Berkenbush, 1982 Lawrence G. Hogan, 1980 Jeremiah F. Mahoney, 1979 June P. Cook, 1981 BOARD OF PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS Thomas Flaherty, 1980 Raymond S. Dower, Ill, "1978 Anthony J. Fusco, 1979 HOUSING AUTHORITY Charles M. Shupe, Chairman, 1980 Edward F. Bartlett, 1982 Harry T. Chisholm, 1981 Clifford A. Wallace, 1979 *Ralph Lewis, Sept. 23, 1979 *Appointed by Governor 4 APPOINTED OFFICERS TOWN ACCOUNT ANT Lincoln R. Walker, 1980 CLERK TO SELECTMEN AND BOARD OF HEALTH Marjorie A. Peterson CLERK TO ASSESSORS Dorothea B. Crowley BOARD OF FIRE ENGINEERS Richard Berkenbush, Chief Russell R. Mingo, Deputy Chief Howard S. Poore, Deputy Chief FOREST FIRE WARDEN Richard Berkenbush CHIEF OF POLICE Eugene M. Willis, Jr. POLICE OFFICERS Anthony M. Campano Edward VanSickle Richard J. Connolly Byron S. Reynolds Charles D. Courtemanche Wilbert H. Thompson SPECIAL POLICE OFFICERS Russell R. Mingo Betsey L. Wallace Edvil G. Hurn Milton Otis, Dr. Page School, Central School Everett Nichols, Town Dump CARETAKER - REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA Everett Nichols FIELD DRIVER AND FENCE VIEWER Charles D. Courtemanche Wilbert H. Thompson DOG OFFICER Everett Nichols 5 CIVIL DEFENSE Russell R. Mingo, Director A. Neil Gadd, Deputy Director J. Winston Popplewell, Deputy Director Charles P. Susen, Communications Officer Fred W. Taylor, Engineering & Shelter Officer Raymond S. Dower, III, Radiological Officer Robert H. Adams, Rescue Officer, Snow Squad Particia Scheidegger, Medical Officer Adelaide Janes, Public Relations Officer AUXILIARY POLICE OFFICERS A. Neil Gadd J. Winston Popplewell Charles P. Susen FINANCE COMMITTEE Barbara L. Gove, Chairman, 1979 Louise E. Mills, 1980 Harry Kimball, 1978 Frank A. Thompson, 1980 George Hagopian, 1978 Russell Lahr, 1979 SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS TREE WARDEN MOTH SUPERINTENDENT Albert H. Knowles, Jr. INSPECTOR OF ANIMALS Everett H. Nichols GRAYES REGISTRATION OFFICER Malcolm B. Poor - Walnut Hill Cemetery Joseph W. Leary - Bridge Street Cemetery Thomas F. Downey - Rural Cemetery John Bailey - Merrimac Cemetery REGISTRARS OF VOTERS Mary Leary, Chairman, 1978 Edward F. Mears, Jr., 1979 Richard Hemingway, 1980 N. H. Hobson, Town Clerk, Ex Officio INSPECTOR OF WIRING Alfred Thomson 6 BUILDING INSPECTOR Bernard L. Guilford, Jr. GAS INSPECTOR AND ASSIST ANT PLUMBING INSPECTOR Louis Grieco PLUMBING INSPECTOR Louis Grieco TOWN COUNSEL John P. Healey BOARD OF APPEALS Frederick M. Faulkner, Jr., Chairman, 1979 Edward Bartlett, 1979 Jeffrey A. Gerrish, 1978 Roger G. Coggeshall, 1978 Raymond J. Tolosko, 1980 ASSOCIATE MEMBERS - BOARD OF APPEALS Lawrence Snell, 1978 Carol A. Derro, 1979 Gary A. Swindlehurst, 1980 OLD AGE ASSISTANCE Mrs. Jarda Cragg, Director, Pentucket Welfare District Tel. 352-2832 - Georgetown, Mass. SENIOR AIDE Vera J. Jameson Tel. 363-5439 VETERANS SERVICE OFFICER James N. Chooljian, Director North Essex Veterans Service District Tel. 352-2426 - One Library St., Georgetown TOWN HALL CUSTODIAN Arthur A. Marston 7 TOWN COMMITTEES CONSERVATION COMMISSION (S) Wayne A. Sanborn, Chairman, 1979 Ralph L. Tucker, 1980 Mary Poore, 1978 Howard Nichols, 1978 Leah M. Mingo, 1979 John F. Rooney, 1979 HISTORICAL COMMISSION (S) M. Elizabeth Thompson, 1979 Gregory H. Laing, 1980 Esther Osman, 1978 H. Richard Hinrichs, 1980 Ronald N. Tagney, 1978 COUNCIL ON AGING (S) *Rt. Rev. Daniel J. Doyle, 1978 Charles Thompson, 1979 Chester L. Fowler, 1978 M. Elizabeth Thompson, 1979 Evelyn M. Fowler, 1978 John Jennell, 1980 Albert Knowles, 1979 Ann Roby, 1980 Wayne Maglione, 1979 Jean G. Cronk, 1980 CENTRAL MERRIMACK VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING DISTRICT (S) June P. Cook Shirley Griffin WHITTIER REGIONAL VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE (SC) Louis A. Porcelli TREE COMMITTEE (M) Stanley Bill John D. Thurlow TOWN FOREST COMMITTEE (S) Stanley Bill Prescott L. Spalding, Jr. William J. Vynorius MILL POND COMMITTEE T. Anne Jarzobski Howard G. Nichols Gary Dunbar Anthony J. Fusco Russell W. Joy, Jr. HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Lawrence Dodge, 1978 Marion Treichler, 1980 Gary Dunbar, 1978 Charles Roy, 1980-Alternate Edward Cummings, 1979 Beatrice Downey, 1980- Alternate Raymond J. Tolosko *Resigned 8 Honorable Board of Selectmen West Newbury, Mass. 01950 April 4, 1978 Gentlemen: Conforming with General Laws of Massachusetts, Chapter 41, Section 60, I submit to you herewith, the financial reports compiled by me for the period July 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977. I have examined the accounts of the Treasurer, Collector, Water Depart­ ment and various Trust Funds. Respectfully submitted, LINCOLN R. WALKER Town Accountant 9 TOWN OF WEST NEWBURY ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT JULY 1, 1976 - JUNE 30, 1977 BALANCE SHEET GENERAL ACCOUNTS ASSETS Cash - Regular $ 181,982.09 Cash - Revenue Sharing 545.30 Investments - Regular 400,000.00 Investments - Revenue Sharing 16,000.00 Accounts Receivable Real Estate Tax 1972 59.75 1973 1974 12.24 1975 460.11 1976 3,077.92 1977 28,258.36 31,868.38 Personal Property Tax 1971 32.50 1973 10.05 1975 199.03 1976 657.24 1977 1,425.89 2,324.71 Motor Vehicle Excise 1971 378.22 1972 364.73 1973 l,738.29 1974 2,179.47 1975 '.3,455.38 1976 11,085.39 1977 34,421.08 53,622.56 Farm Animal Excise 1977 60.00 Water 18,109.48 Water Leins 1977 552.73 18,662.21 Tax Titles Held (7 Parcels) 5,617.99 Tax Possessions 65.43 5,683.42 State Aid to Highways 52,955.48 Overdrafts, Etc. Highways -Chap. 765 ATM 5/17/75 Art. 10 20,777.00 Water Reserve 1,240.96 10 Essex Cty Retirement System 8,780.00 Overlay 76-77 1,560.59 County Tax 76-77 5,160.98 Election & Registration Expense 154.38 Settlement of Dog Case - R. Noble 325.00 Purchase Police Cruiser 74.84 Fire Dept. Expense 94.97 Emergency Ambulance Service 200.00 Civil Defence Expenses 6.51 38,375.23 Loans Authorized 35,000.00 Revenue - Fiscal 1977-1978 1,715,993.52 TOTAL ASSETS 2,553 ,072. 90 LIABILITIES & RESERVES Revenue Reserved Until Collected State Aid to Highway 52,955.48 Tax Titles 5,683.42 Motor Vehicle 53,622.56 Farm Animal 60.00 Water 18,662.21 130,983.67 Unexpended Balances, Etc. Tailings 565.09 Highways Sec. 20 Chap. 1140-1973 5,000.00 Highways Chap. 74 Local Aid Nov. '76 12,168.00 Elliott Fund Income 10,891.58 Emery Fund Income 59.37 Albertson Fund Income 1.05 Dog Licenses 166.05 Sales of Dogs 3.00 State Parks & Reservations 495.02 M. V. Air Pollution Control 2.95 Antirecession Fiscal Asst. PR 94-369 3,039.00 Overlay 1971 293.00 1972 623.50 1973 184.68 1974 1371.65 1975 8218.36 1976 l2717 .67 23,408.86 Overlay Surplus Reserve 22,239.40 Road Machinery Fund 3,043.50 11 Library Building Fund 31.68 T. Kennett Library Fund Income 98.22 A. Dodge Library Fund Income 21.20 J. Durgin Library Fund Income 20.27 J. H. Durgin Library Fund Income 4.32 Deed Emery to Town of West New. 1.00 Library Reserve Fund 1,538.12 School Athletic Fund 52.60 Cemetery Fund - Mr. Farrington 42.00 B.C., B.S., & Ins. Prem. Withheld 1,017.40 Colonial Penn Ins. Prem Withheld 4.69 Excess & Deficiency 249,172.77 Application Etc. for Fed. & State 1,500.00 Shelves for Office 20.99 Historical District Study Com. 76.19 Bicentennial Comm. Exp. 147.87 Embroidered W. N. Flag 5.00 Repair Generator 400.00 Revolving Fund for Off-Duty 50.00 Purchase Breathalyser 134.00 Purchase Monitor Receiver 50.00 Purchase 1975 Police Cruiser 41.50 Construct Fire Station Garden St. 18,787.91 Repair Driveway etc. Main Fire Sta. 563.98 Civil Defense Rescue Truck 4.98 Road Machinery Operating Acct. 7,675.97 Clear Brush at Triangle 29.50 Culverts Prospect St. 411.04 Drains Albion Lane 221.09 Communication System Highway etc. 4,000.00 Article 6 Highway Construction 7,973.50 Article 9 Highway Maintenance etc. 10,341.01 Highway Construction Chap. 765 5,777.00 Construct Roads 30,091.47 Awards & Land Damages 210.00 Awards & Land Damages 700.00 Purchase Snow Plow 1.00 Purchase Sander 187.40 Improve Crane Neck St.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
    DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
    Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Us Epa Archive Document
    Author’s Copy of Article Published in Water,Air1 and Soil Pollution (2008) 191:15-31. DOI: RUNNING HEAD: Fish Mercury Hotspot 10.1007/s11270-007-9604-9. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com TITLE: FRESHWATER FISH MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS IN A REGIONALLY HIGH MERCURY DEPOSITION AREA AUTHORS: Michael S. Hutcheson,1 C. Mark Smith,1 Gordon T.Wallace,2 Jane Rose,1 Barbara Eddy,3 James Sullivan,3 Oscar Pancorbo,3 and Carol Rowan West1 AFFILIATIONS: 1 Office of Research and Standards, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, 1 Winter Street, Boston, MA 02108,USA. 2 Earth, Environmental and Ocean Sciences Department, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA 02125-3393,USA. 3 Sen. W. X. Wall Experiment Station, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, 37 Shattuck Street, Lawrence, MA 01843-1398, USA. CORRESPONDING AUTHOR ADDRESS: Michael Hutcheson Office of Research and Standards Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 1 Winter St., Boston, MA 02108 USA Phone: 617-292-5998; fax: 617-556-1006; email: [email protected] 2 ABSTRACT. We sampled and analyzed individually, edible dorsal muscle from largemouth bass (LMB), Micropterus salmoides (n=138) and yellow perch (YP), Perca flavescens (n=97) from 15 lakes to investigate potential local impacts of mercury emission point sources in northeastern Massachusetts (MA), USA. This area was identified in three separate modeling exercises as a mercury deposition hotspot. In 1995, 55% of mercury emissions to the environment from all MA sources came from three municipal solid waste combustors (trash incinerators) and one large regional medical waste incinerator in the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL (PDF)
    Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission October 24, 2007 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Fish Tissue Mercury Studies: Long-Term
    MassDEP Long-Term Monitoring MASSACHUSETTS FISH TISSUE MERCURY STUDIES: LONG-TERM MONITORING RESULTS, 1999 - 2004 by Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Office of Research and Standards 1 Winter St., Boston, MA 02043 and Wall Experiment Station Lawrence, MA 2006 MassDEP Long-Term Monitoring PREFACE In 1994, the first comprehensive Massachusetts statewide examination of mercury in freshwater fish was conducted (MassDEP 1997). This study was followed in 1999 by an investigation of fish mercury concentrations in a region of the state predicted to have regionally high atmospheric deposition of mercury (MassDEP 2003b). That study was complemented by a study of historical mercury deposition into one lake in this region through the analysis of a sediment core using radioisotope dating techniques (Wallace et al. 2004). Additional work addressing mercury emissions and deposition is ongoing. A number of additional studies have been conducted as part of the Department’s continuing efforts to better elucidate the status of the Commonwealth’s freshwater fish populations and environments with respect to mercury contamination. A long-term monitoring network of lakes was established in 2001 to provide temporal tracking of changes in the mercury contamination status of fish in the Commonwealth, particularly as comprehensive mercury use and emissions reductions efforts have been implemented in Massachusetts and regionally. Results from these lakes will also provide a perspective on the scale of natural variability in tissue mercury concentrations for comparison with other sources of variation. The results from the first 5 years of this effort are contained in this report and in particular highlight the changes in fish tissue mercury concentrations which have taken place in the high mercury deposition area during a period when emissions from major point sources of mercury to the atmosphere have declined substantially in Massachusetts and across the region.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Water Supply Alternatives Analysis
    SECTION 5 WATER SUPPLY ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS The section presents and screens alternatives that could meet North Reading’s water supply needs. The Water Supply Needs section estimated that the town needs at least an additional 0.4 million gallons per day (MGD) of water supply to meet the Town’s maximum day demand (MDD) of 2.58 MGD. This need represents the future growth of the system to accommodate existing persons currently not served by the municipal water system as well as parcels and lots that are undeveloped. The MDD also presumes the Town will reduce water consumption to 65 gpcd and the Unaccounted for Water to 10%, from current levels. The goal of this section is to identify alternatives that would most successfully meet this need, with minimum environmental impact and optimum economic impacts. As a result of this planning effort, the Town of North Reading hopes to achieve a number of goals for their water system in addition to providing the needed surplus to meet future demands. A new water source alternative should: · Provide a long-term and sustainable solution. · Reduce water system complexity. · Maintain reliable service to existing and future commercial/industrial customers. · Keep capital, operations, and maintenance costs manageable. · Mitigate stress on the Ipswich River Basin. 5.1 INITIAL SCREENING As stated in the Environmental Notification Form Certificate, the town should consider three specific alternatives and combinations of these alternatives to meet projected MDDs: · No build alternative · In town alternative · MWRA alternative These alternatives are described in more detail in the following sections. 5.1.1 No Build The “No Build” alternative evaluates impacts associated with maintaining current groundwater withdrawals from Town wells and water purchased from the Town of Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylmercury Exposure Through Fish Ingestion and Trends in Human Health Risk in the Merrimack River Watershed
    Methylmercury Exposure through Fish Ingestion and Trends in Human Health Risk in the Merrimack River Watershed A thesis submitted by Tiffany A. Blake in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering Tufts University August 2017 Advisers: Anne Marie C. Desmarais, David M. Gute, Diane M. Manganaro ABSTRACT Northeast Massachusetts has the highest concentration of point sources for mercury emissions in the state. Emissions from major point sources decreased 96% from the 1990s to 2008 as a result of stricter controls on releases. Fish consumption is the primary exposure route for people. This thesis used risk assessment to assess whether reduction in mercury emissions over time was contributing to lower exposure and risk among people who eat fish from lakes and ponds in the Merrimack River watershed. Decreases in risk were observed from 1999 to 2011, but this risk assessment demonstrates that unacceptable risk continues to exist for people who eat fish from these water bodies, especially young children. Small sample sizes and differences in average fish weight throughout the study period introduced uncertainty in the study. The observed reduced risk has positive public health implications but also demonstrates the continuing need for fish advisories. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express great thanks to my committee members: Anne Marie Desmarais, David Gute, and Diane Manganaro for their continuous guidance throughout this entire process. With special thanks to my advisor Anne Marie, who served as my editor, mentor, and inspiration throughout my graduate studies. I thank Carolyn Talmadge, Tufts GIS Specialist, and Karen Vagts, Tufts Librarian, for lending me their expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality, Fish Ecology, and Hydropower in the Merrimack River Since the Time of Thoreau Timothy Melia University of New Hampshire, Durham
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Fall 2016 The wS ift aW ter Place: Water Quality, Fish Ecology, and Hydropower in the Merrimack River since the Time of Thoreau Timothy Melia University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Melia, Timothy, "The wS ift aW ter Place: Water Quality, Fish Ecology, and Hydropower in the Merrimack River since the Time of Thoreau" (2016). Doctoral Dissertations. 1362. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/1362 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The wS ift aW ter Place: Water Quality, Fish Ecology, and Hydropower in the Merrimack River since the Time of Thoreau Abstract The eM rrimack River and its landscape reflect the priorities that have shaped the stream for two centuries. When Henry David Thoreau and his brother John put their dory into the Merrimack in September of 1839, they were paddling into a landscape that was shifting towards water-powered industries and mill cities. The legal transformation of water and the completion of the Great Stone Dam at Lawrence in 1847 spelled the end of the anadromous fish runs that had populated the Merrimack for centuries. Salmon restoration proceeded for three decades after the Civil War until fish passage failed.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsuuseuracsbe
    RAYMOND STRATHAM Rye Harbor RYE FREMONT BRENTWOOD Lamprey River KITTERY AUBURN 109thEXETER Congress of the United States Exeter NORTH HAMPTON Manchester Little River CHESTER Meadow Pond SANDOWN Greenwood Pond Hampton HAMPTON KENSINGTON HAMPTON FALLS Derry Angle Pond DANVILLE EAST KINGSTON Browns East SEABROOK River Merrimack DERRY Wash Pond SOUTH HAMPTON E LONDONDERRY HAMPSTEAD KINGSTON IR SH Tuxbury Pond P TS AM T NEW H SE NEWTON U Lake Gardner StHwy 286 Island H (Pike St) Pond ROCKINGHAM C AMESBURY SA L MAS a f a y Amesbury e t te R d Lake Attitash 1 StHwy 1 10 (Elm S t) 110 SALISBURY LITCHFIELD PLAISTOW MERRIMAC wy ATKINSON StH St ain ) Londonderry (M Salisbury Brandy Brow Rd d R e g d i S r tH B ( w ) H i y d g 1 R h 1 S 3 ry t bu ) es Am 0 ( WINDHAM y 11 Newburyport w H t) t S S ain Crystal M S ( Lake 3 tH 1 Upper Artichoke Reservoir w 1 y y 1 w 2 H Cobbetts 5 t S t Pond ( S WEST NEWBURY H M Kenoza w a y 1 in Lake SALEM A S Haverhill lt t ) (H StH i wy g (Bro 97 h HILLSBOROUGH ad R wa d y) ) StHwy S 1 tH 1 w 3 y (W 11 a 0 te NEWBURY (R t) r HUDSON r S S Merrimac River Hudson iv e t) ) St in e a k S Atlantic Ocean M p ( t 125 H T y wy 95 t w r M World End Pond tH o 9 p er S 7 y GROVELAND r r ( Johnson Cr S u i b m c h w ) a ) o e t 0 t o S c N 1 S l k S n 3 1 i 1 k 2 I R t a y c s y ) l a a i w w v tH M n m Chadwick Pond ( d e S 3 H i t r 1 ) r R t r 1 S lt Nashua S d y t e A w n M 1 H a ( ) y t t Pentucket Pond PELHAM S s St w a S Methuen e Hwy H l ( 9 t (P d M 7 a S o Johnsons Pond in St o Rock Pond ) g s O ROWLEY ( 5 GEORGETOWN
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 163.51 KB, for Massachusetts Great Ponds List
    Massachusetts Great Ponds List Any project located in, on, over or under the water of a great pond is within the jurisdiction of Chapter 91. A great pond is defined as any pond or lake that contained more than 10 acres in its natural state. Ponds that once measured 10 or more acres in their natural state, but which are now smaller, are still considered great ponds. This is a county-by-county listing of great ponds in Massachusetts, according to a 1996 Waterways Program Study. This listing was last revised in September 2017 (updating ponds in Hopkinton, Milford, and Upton). Barnstable County Barnstable: Garretts Pond Upper Mill Pond Hamblin Pond Walkers Pond Hathaway Pond (lower portion) Long Pond Bourne: Lovell's Pond Middle Pond Great Herring Pond (Plymouth) [Added to Mystic Pond Bourne 2006] Red Lily Pond/Lake Elizabeth (added 1/30/2014) Round Pond Chatham: Rushy Marsh Pond (originally tidal) Shubael Pond Emery Pond Wequaquet Lake (includes Bearse Pond) Goose Pond Lovers Lake Brewster: Mill Pond Schoolhouse Pond Baker's Pond Stillwater Pond Black Pond (Harwich) White Pond Blueberry pond Cahoon Pond (Harwich) Dennis: Canoe Pond Cliff Pond Baker's Pond Cobbs Pond Eagle Pond Elbow Pond Flax Pond Flax pond Fresh Pond Grassy Pond (Harwich) Grassy Pond Greenland Pond Run Pond Griffith's Pond Scargo Pond Higgin's Pond Simmons Pond Little Cliff Pond White Pond (Harwich) Long Pond (Harwich) Lower Mill Pond Eastham: Pine Pond Seymour Pond/Bangs Pond (Harwich) Depot Pond Sheep Pond Great Pond Slough Pond Herring/Coles Pond Smalls Pond Minister
    [Show full text]
  • MERRIMACK RIVER a Com Prehensive W Atershed Assessm Ent Report 2001
    Powow River, Amesbury, MA MWT Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MERRIMACK RIVER A Com prehensive W atershed Assessm ent Report 2001 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 251 Causeway Street, Suite 900 Boston, MA 02114-2119 JANE SW IFT GOVERNOR Tel. (617) 626-1000 BOB DURAND Fax (617) 626-1181 SECRETARY June 2002 http://www.m ass.gov/envir Dear Friends of the Merrimack River Watershed: I am pleased to present the Year 3 Assessment Report for the Merrimack River Watershed. This report outlines the main environmental issues that face the watershed and provides the most current status of the Merrimack River. This report will help formulate the 5-year watershed action plan that will guide state and local environmental actions within the Merrimack River Watershed. The plan will implement the goals of the Massachusetts Watershed Initiative including: improving water quality; restoring natural flows to rivers; protecting and restoring biodiversity and habitats; improving public access and balanced resource use; improving local capacity; and promoting a shared responsibility for watershed protection and management. The EOEA Merrimack River Watershed Team Leader has developed this Assessment Report after extensive research and input was provided from state and federal agencies, Regional Planning Agencies, watershed groups and organizations, and team members. The Watershed Initiative is unique because it focuses on the problems and challenges that are identified with stakeholders and local community partners in each watershed, rather than deciding these priorities solely at the state level. The priority issues identified in the Report include: Water Quality ‹ Water Quantity and Supply ‹ Open Space ‹ Habitat I commend all of those involved with the Merrimack River Assessment effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Regional Mercury TMDL – October 2007 Ii
    Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission October 24, 2007 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]