DOCSLIB.ORG

Methylmercury Exposure Through Fish Ingestion and Trends in Human Health Risk in the Merrimack River Watershed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Methylmercury Exposure Through Fish Ingestion and Trends in Human Health Risk in the Merrimack River Watershed Methylmercury Exposure through Fish Ingestion and Trends in Human Health Risk in the Merrimack River Watershed A thesis submitted by Tiffany A. Blake in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering Tufts University August 2017 Advisers: Anne Marie C. Desmarais, David M. Gute, Diane M. Manganaro ABSTRACT Northeast Massachusetts has the highest concentration of point sources for mercury emissions in the state. Emissions from major point sources decreased 96% from the 1990s to 2008 as a result of stricter controls on releases. Fish consumption is the primary exposure route for people. This thesis used risk assessment to assess whether reduction in mercury emissions over time was contributing to lower exposure and risk among people who eat fish from lakes and ponds in the Merrimack River watershed. Decreases in risk were observed from 1999 to 2011, but this risk assessment demonstrates that unacceptable risk continues to exist for people who eat fish from these water bodies, especially young children. Small sample sizes and differences in average fish weight throughout the study period introduced uncertainty in the study. The observed reduced risk has positive public health implications but also demonstrates the continuing need for fish advisories. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express great thanks to my committee members: Anne Marie Desmarais, David Gute, and Diane Manganaro for their continuous guidance throughout this entire process. With special thanks to my advisor Anne Marie, who served as my editor, mentor, and inspiration throughout my graduate studies. I thank Carolyn Talmadge, Tufts GIS Specialist, and Karen Vagts, Tufts Librarian, for lending me their expertise. I also thank my family (special thanks to my mother and Christopher, for shuttling me around and always lending an ear), my grandparents (Pop and my inspirational “Tufts grad” Nana), my friends, and my Pj for their unfaltering love and support. I would like to dedicate my work to you. I would also like to dedicate this work in memory of my loved ones that are no longer with us: to my grandparents (Nene and Papa); a special thank you to my Uncle Bob, who spent hours talking with me as I was beginning this journey. I love you all, always. Thank you to my undergraduate advisor, Joel, who encouraged me to apply to Tufts. Thank you to my boss and newest mentor, Glen, for being understanding, accommodating, and believing in me. Lastly, I thank my mentors who have shared both scientific expertise and friendship: Peter, Carol, and Nina. With special thanks to Nina, who gave me a chance that I will never forget… I promise to pay it forward someday. Thank you Tufts University Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, both students and faculty, for continuing to fuel my passion of environmental health. May this passion and enjoyment never falter as I build my career to protect all beings, and most importantly, our Earth: without which life would cease to exist. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………...ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………….iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………...1 2.0 BACKGROUND……………………………………………………………..4 2.1 Mercury in the Environment…………………………………………..5 2.2 Mercury in Environmental Media……………………………………..7 2.2.1 Atmospheric…………………………………………………7 2.2.2 Water..…………………………………………………….....8 2.2.3 Soil…………………………………………………………..9 2.3 Bioconcentration and Biomagnification……………………………..10 2.4 Sources of Human Exposure to Mercury…………………………….11 2.5 Health Effects and Toxicology of Mercury in Humans……………...12 Health Effects…………………………………………………….12 Absorption and Distribution……………………………………..13 Metabolism……………………………………………………….13 Excretion………………………………………………………....14 2.6 Risk Assessment and Dose-Response Variables…………………….14 2.6.1 Dose-Response Variables………………………………….15 2.7 Methylmercury Epidemiological Studies Used to Derive Dose- Response Values…………………………………………………………16 Faroe Islands and the EPA Reference Dose for Chronic Oral Exposure (RfD)…………………………………………………..18 Seychelles Child Development Study and the ATSDR Minimal Risk Level (MRL)……………………………………...………………19 2.8 Health Benefits of Fish Consumption vs. Mercury Exposure……….21 2.9 Risk with Consuming Freshwater Fish vs. All Fish…………………24 2.10 Fish Consumption Studies………………………………………….25 2.11 Massachusetts Fish Consumption Advisories for Mercury in Freshwater Fish……………………..……………………………………26 2.12 Massachusetts Regulations…………………………………………27 Mercury Added Products………………………………………...27 Emissions………………………………………………………...28 2.13 Massachusetts Fish-Tissue Mercury Reductions…………………...30 3.0 METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………32 3.1 Study Methods……………………………………………………….32 3.2 Fish Mercury Data…………………………………………………...32 3.2.1 Merrimack River Watershed……………………………….33 Municipal Solid Waste Combustors……………………...33 Regulatory Initiatives…………………………………….34 iv Fish Tissue Monitoring………………………………..…35 Merrimack River Water Body Selection…………………35 3.2.2 Selection of Water Bodies for Study……………………….37 3.2.3 Risk Assessment Procedure………………………………..39 3.2.4 Selection of Exposure Parameters…………………………41 Exposure Point Concentrations………………………….41 Ingestion Rate……………………………………………42 Calculation of Ingestion Rates…………………………...44 Exposure Frequency……………………………………..45 Exposure Duration……………………………………….45 Relative Absorption Factor………………………………46 Body Weight……………………………………………...46 Averaging Period………………………………………...46 3.2.5 Risk Characterization……………………………………...46 Hazard Index (HI)………………………………………..47 Determining Reduction in Risk…………………………..47 4.0 RESULTS…………………………………………………………...49 4.1 Results of Risk Calculations…………………………………49 Exposure Calculation…………………………………….49 Exposure Point Concentration…………………………...49 4.2 Summary Risk Tables for Merrimack River Watershed……..50 4.3 Summary of Percent Change in Risk from Year to Year…….51 Chadwicks Pond………………………………………….52 Haggetts Pond……………………………………………53 Johnsons Pond…………………………………………...54 Lake Attitash……………………………………………..55 Lake Cochichewick………………………………………56 Pomps Pond……………………………………………...57 Stevens Pond……………………………………………..58 4.4 Summary of Percent Change in Risk from Baseline HI(1999) to Later Years.....………………………………………………...59 5.0 DISCUSSION……………………………………………..………...61 5.1 Varying Parameters and Risk Classification……………...….61 5.1.1 U.S. EPA Reference Dose (RfD) Versus ATSDR Minimal Risk Level( MRL)….……………………..……62 5.1.2 Calculated Risk Using Multipliers………………....63 5.2 Tipping Point and Massachusetts Department of Public Health Risk Management Approach……………………………………..64 5.2.1 Current Fish Consumption Advisories…………….64 Chadwicks Pond………………………………………….66 Haggetts Pond…………………………………………....66 Johnsons Pond…………………………………………...67 Lake Attitash……………………………………………..68 Lake Cochichewick………………………………………69 v Pomps Pond……………………………………………...69 Stevens Pond……………………………………………..70 5.3 Observations of Year-to-Year Trends and Effects of Sample Size and Average Fish Weight………..………………………….72 Chadwicks Pond………………………………………….72 Haggetts Pond……………………………………………72 Johnsons Pond…………………………………………...76 Lake Attitash……………………………………………..77 Lake Cochichewick………………………………………79 Pomps Pond……………………………………………...80 Stevens Pond……………………………………………..82 5.4 Discussion of Percent Changes of Baseline HI(1999) to Later Years Sampled…………………………………………………………..84 5.4.1 Acceptance of Alternative Hypothesis……………..85 5.5 Risk Levels from Consumption of Different Species………..85 5.6 Communicating Health Risk in Risk Management………….86 5.7 Regulation and Risk Interpretation…………………………..89 5.8 Future Research……………………………………………...90 5.9 Uncertainty Analysis…………………………………………92 Small Data Sets…………………………………………..92 Temporal Issues………………………………………….93 Exposure Uncertainties…………………………………..93 Dietary Preferences……………………………………...93 Intake…………………………………………………….93 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS………………………...95 6.1 Conclusions…………………………………………………..95 6.2 Recommendations……………………………………………97 6.3 Epilogue…………………………………………………….100 REFERENCES……………………………………………………..…………101 APPENDICES Appendix A Maps of the Merrimack River Watershed Appendix B HI Summary Tables Appendix C Species-Specific EPCs per Year Appendix D Full Risk Calculations vi LIST OF TABLES Table 3-1 Merrimack River Water Bodies Data Table 3-2 Dose-Response Values Table 3-3 Exposure Profile Summary Table 3-4 Species Specific Exposure Point Concentrations (mg/kg ww) Table 3-5 Fish Ingestion Rate Summary for Several Surveys Table 3-6 Summary of Exposure (Ingestion) Frequency Table 4-1 Summary of Exposure Calculation Inputs Table 4-2 Summary of Percent Changes in Risk from Year to Year Table 4-3 Summary of Percent Change from Baseline HI(1999) Table 5-1 Multipliers for Child 7-16, Adult, and Woman of Childbearing Age In Comparison to Child 2-6 Table 5-2 Merrimack River Watershed Freshwater Fish Consumption Advisories Table 5-3 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Chadwicks Pond Table 5-4 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Haggetts Pond Table 5-5 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Johnsons Pond Table 5-6 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Lake Attitash Table 5-7 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Lake Cochichewick Table 5-8 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Pomps Pond Table 5-9 Exposure Scenario, in Meals per Year, with Risks (HI) Greater than 1 for Child 2-6 at Stevens
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
    DRAFT Northeast Regional Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Maine Department of Environmental Protection Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission April 2007 DRAFT Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ..........................................................................................................................................................iv Figures.........................................................................................................................................................iv Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................................v Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................vi Abbreviations ...........................................................................................................................................xiii Definition of Terms..................................................................................................................................xvi
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Revisions to 314 CMR 4.00 (Tables and Figures, Clean)
    Please see the 314 CMR 4.00 Summary and Notice to Reviewers document, as well as the Fact Sheets on particular topics for additional information and explanatory detail associated with these proposed regulatory changes. These documents are available on the MassDEP Website. 314 CMR: DIVISION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL 4.06: continued LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES* TABLE & TABLE AND CORRESPONDING FIGURE TITLE Page # FIGURE # A (Figure only) River Basins and Coastal Drainage Areas TF-2 1 Blackstone River Basin TF-3 2 Boston Harbor Drainage Area (formerly Boston Harbor Drainage System and Mystic, Neponset and Weymouth & Weir River Basins) TF-8 3 Buzzards Bay Coastal Drainage Area TF-17 4 Cape Cod Coastal Drainage Area TF-22 5 Charles River Basin TF-30 6 Chicopee River Basin TF-34 7 Connecticut River Basin TF-40 8 Deerfield River Basin TF-49 9 Farmington River Basin TF-58 10 French River Basin TF-60 11 Housatonic River Basin TF-62 12 Hudson River Basin (formerly Hoosic, Kinderhook and Bashbish) TF-70 13 Ipswich River Basin TF-76 14 Islands Coastal Drainage Area (formerly Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket) TF-79 15 Merrimack River Basin TF-81 16 Millers River Basin TF-86 17 Narragansett Bay and Mount Hope Bay Drainage Area TF-90 18 Nashua River Basin TF-93 19 North Coastal Drainage Area TF-103 20 Parker River Basin TF-109 21 Quinebaug River Basin TF-113 22 Shawsheen River Basin TF-116 23 South Coastal Drainage Area TF-118 24 Sudbury, Assabet, and Concord (SuAsCo) River Basin (formerly Concord) TF-123 25 Taunton River Basin TF-128 26 Ten Mile River Basin TF-132 27 Westfield River Basin TF-134 28 (Table only) Site-Specific Criteria TF-144 29 (Table only) GenerallyApplicable Criteria: 29a.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Report
    IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT 20173509.001A JUNE 19, 2017 This project has been financed partially with State Capital Funds from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (the Department) under a Sustainable Water Management Initiative Grant. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Department, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. TOWN OF DANVERS TOWN OF MIDDLETON TOWN OF HAMILTON LYNNFIELD CENTER WATER DISTRICT TOWN OF TOPSFIELD TOWN OF WENHAM WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report © 2017 Kleinfelder A Report Prepared for: The Town of Danvers, MA In partnership with: Town of Middleton, MA Town of Hamilton, MA Lynnfield Center Water District Town of Topsfield, MA Town of Wenham, MA IPSWICH BASIN WATER MANAGEMENT ACT PLANNING GRANT FY17 DRAFT REPORT Prepared by: Kirsten N. Ryan, P.G.(NH) Project Manager; Principal Hydrogeologist Reviewed by: Elizabeth C. Frederick Principal Planner KLEINFELDER 215 First Street, Suite 320 Cambridge, MA 02142 Phone: 617.497.7800 Fax: 617.498.4630 June 19, 2017 20173509.001A WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page i of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS to be added WMA Grant Ipswich Basin Report Page ii of v DRAFT June 19, 2017 © 2017 Kleinfelder TABLE OF CONTENTS ____________________________________________________________________________ Section Page 0 EXECUTIVE
    [Show full text]
  • Cyanobacteria Monitoring Perspectives from Region 1
    Cyanobacteria Monitoring Perspectives from Region 1 NWQMC WEBINAR SERIES TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2016 HILARY SNOOK USEPA REGION 1 LABORATORY Today’s Talk Basic approach Methods and tools employed Addressing data Why the Need? A request from states No clear picture A moving target A need at multiple levels Educational Data need/modeling Resource management tool Risk/vulnerability UNH What Must it Encompass Multi-tiered with ability for technical expansion Low budget but technically sound Easily implemented Regionally consistency (standardized methods) New information at multiple levels Educational/Informative Utility for resource management applications Address ambient waters (preemptive) and bloom conditions Commensurate QA Workgroup Participants VTDEC Massachusetts Charles River Watershed Association Lake Champlain Basin Monitoring Program University of Rhode Island Watershed Watch NHDES Volunteer Monitoring Network Partnership NHDES Beaches/Lakes Program New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission NHDES Drinking Water Program USEPA Atlantic Ecology Division University of New Hampshire CFB CTDEEP Ambient Monitoring Program University of New Hampshire Extension Office CT Federation of Lakes Lebanon NH PWS USEPA Mid-Continent Ecology Division Manchester NH PWS USGS Merideth NH PWS Lim-Tex, LLC Pennichuck Water Works NH Eastern Analytical, Inc. Wakefield New Hampshire Lakes Collaborative Penobscot Nation Maine DEP Lakes Program Individual Citizen Scientists Maine Dover-Foxcroft Water
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Journal
    UNCORRECTED PROOF. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts ___________ JOURNAL OF THE SENATE. THURSDAY, JULY 16, 2020 [70] 1 UNCORRECTED PROOF. JOURNAL OF THE SENATE Thursday, July 16, 2020. Met at seven minutes past eleven o’clock A.M. (Mr. Boncore in the Chair) (having been appointed by the President, under authority conferred by Senate Rule 4, to perform the duties of the Chair). The Chair (Mr. Boncore), members, guests and staff then recited the pledge of Pledge of allegiance. allegiance to the flag. Communications. The following communications were severlly receoved and placed on file, to wit: Communication from the Honorable Karen E. Spilak, President of the Senate (under Soldiers’ Home in the provisions of House Order 4835), announcing the following appointments to the Holyoke,-- special commission. Special Commission to the Joint Oversight Committee to make an investigation and study of the Soldiers’ Home in Holyoke (received July 16, 2020) Senator Walter F. Timilty – Co-Chair Senator Anne M. Gobi Senator Michael F. Rush Senator John C. Velis Senator James T. Welch Communication from the Honorable Bruce E. Tarr, Senate Minority Leader (under Id. the provisions of House Order 4835), appointing Senator Dean Tran of Fitchburg to serve as his appointee to the Special Commission to the Joint Oversight Committee to make an investigation and study of the Soldiers’ Home in Holyoke (received July 15, 2020). Petitions. Petitions were severally presented and referred as follows: By Ms. Lovely, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 2826) of Joan B. Lovely Topsfield,-- and Bradford Hill (by vote of the town) for legislation relative to the reorganization of the reorganization.
    [Show full text]
  • Amesbury Reconnaissance Report
    AMESBURY RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ESSEX COUNTY LANDSCAPE INVENTORY MASSACHUSETTS HERITAGE LANDSCAPE INVENTORY PROGRAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Essex National Heritage Commission PROJECT TEAM Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Jessica Rowcroft, Preservation Planner Division of Planning and Engineering Essex National Heritage Commission Bill Steelman, Director of Heritage Preservation Project Consultants Shary Page Berg Gretchen G. Schuler Virginia Adams, PAL Local Project Coordinator Orlando Pacheco Local Heritage Landscape Participants Jim Babbin Michael A. Browne Deborah Allen Carey Jim Dowd Paul Fenner Jon Higgins Nanette Masi Bruce McBrien Juli McDonald Orlando Pacheco Jay Williamson May 2005 INTRODUCTION Essex County is known for its unusually rich and varied landscapes, which are represented in each of its 34 municipalities. Heritage landscapes are places that are created by human interaction with the natural environment. They are dynamic and evolving; they reflect the history of a community and provide a sense of place; they show the natural ecology that influenced land use patterns; and they often have scenic qualities. This wealth of landscapes is central to each community’s character; yet heritage landscapes are vulnerable and ever changing. For this reason it is important to take the first steps towards their preservation by identifying those landscapes that are particularly valued by the community – a favorite local farm, a distinctive neighborhood or mill village, a unique natural feature, an inland river corridor or the rocky coast. To this end, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) and the Essex National Heritage Commission (ENHC) have collaborated to bring the Heritage Landscape Inventory program (HLI) to communities in Essex County.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST NEWBURY TRAINING FIELD Where Newbury Men Trained for the Revolutionary War and West Newbury Men Trained for the Civil War ANNUAL STATEMENT of the RECEIPTS
    WEST NEWBURY TRAINING FIELD Where Newbury men trained for the Revolutionary War and West Newbury men trained for the Civil War ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE RECEIPTS AND EXPENDITURES OF THE Together with the Reports of the School Committee, Board of Engineers, Trustees of the Public Library, Assessors, Auditor, Treasurer and Collector and the Statistics of the Town Clerk. Printed by ~ NEWBURYPORT P11Ess, INc. lln )mlemnrhnn Harold T. Daley January 8, 1911 December 9, 1977 Selectman Assessor Board of Public Welfare Board of Health 1936-1938 Selectman Assessor Board of Public Welfare Board of Health 1951-1956 Member of First Water Board 1936 DIRECTORY OF TOWN OFFICERS BOARD OF SELECTMEN Stephen F. Burke, Jr., Chairman, 1978 Ann S. Reilly, 1979 Albert E. Elwell, 1980 BOARD OF PUBLIC HEAL TH Albert E. Elwell, Chairman, 1980 Stephen F. Burke, Jr., 1978 Ann S. Reilly, 1979 BOARD OF ASSESSORS Dorothea B. Crowley, Chairman, 1978 George E. Schofield, 1979 Steven W. Cashman, 1980 MODERATOR William A. Cook, 1979 TOWN TREASURER AND TAX COLLECTOR Norman H. Hobson, 1979 TOWN CLERK Norman H. Hobson, 1980 SCHOOL COMMITTEE William P. Bannister, Chairman, 1980 Louis A. Porcelli, 1978 Wayne G. Maglione, 1979 Barbara M. Wells, 1979 Gunter Waehling, 1980 BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS Charles D. Courtemanche, Chairman, 1979 Edward Vansickle, 1978 David Jennell, 1980 CONSTABLES Charles b. Courtemanche, 1980 Wilbert H. Thompson, 1980 Eugene M. Willis, Jr., 1980 BOARD OF TRUSTEES G.A.R. MEMORIAL LIBRARY David D. Hindle, Chairman, 1979 Ann S. Lape, Recording Secretary, 1978 J. Jackson George, 1979 Philip J. Crowley, 1980 Hugh F. Cawley, 1978 Sarkis M.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Lake Attitash Rd – Unit a Amesbury, Mass
    MORTGAGEE’S FORECLOSURE SALE REAL ESTATE AUCTION - roperty nformation acket - P I P Deed Info: Book: 26303 Page 461 Taxes: $4,196.04 Assessed Value: $287,400.00 4 LAKE ATTITASH RD – UNIT A AMESBURY, MASS Thursday, November 20th @ 1:00 PM Preview: Drive By Recommended Registration Auction Day: 1 hr. prior to sale JOHN McINNIS AUCTIONEERS 76 Main Street ~ Amesbury, MA 800-822-1417 ♦ mcinnisauctions.com MA Lic# 770 TABLE OF CONTENTS Transmittal Letter Disclaimer Property Description Mortgagee’s Sale of Real Estate Memorandum of Sale Plot Plan MLC Assessor Card th Auction Date: Thursday, November 20 @ 1:00 PM Lake Attitash is a lake located on the border of Merrimac, Massachusetts and Amesbury, Massachusetts, and constitutes at least a portion of Amesbury's water supply. There are beaches both on the Amesbury and Merrimac shores. Merrimac's beach is known as Indian Head Park. The lake was formerly known as "Kimball's Pond". The lake is popular with seasonal tourists, as well as residents. It is normally safe for swimming. Boats are allowed on the lake. This shallow, 360-acre enlarged natural great pond has a maximum depth of 30 feet and an average depth of 11 feet JOHN McINNIS AUCTIONEERS 76 Main Street ~ Amesbury, MA 800-822-1417 ♦ mcinnisauctions.com MA Lic# 770 Dear Prospective Bidder: Thank you for your inquiry and interest in our upcoming Mortgagee’s Real Estate Foreclosure Auction located at 4 Lake Attitash Road, Unit A in Amesbury, Massachusetts at 1 pm. This two bedroom, one bath 1920’s style lake cottage will be sold at Public Auction To be eligible to bid, at the time of registration you must present a $10,000.00 deposit in cash or certified check.
    [Show full text]
  • MDPH Beaches Annual Report 2008
    Marine and Freshwater Beach Testing in Massachusetts Annual Report: 2008 Season Massachusetts Department of Public Health Bureau of Environmental Health Environmental Toxicology Program http://www.mass.gov/dph/topics/beaches.htm July 2009 PART ONE: THE MDPH/BEH BEACHES PROJECT 3 I. Overview ......................................................................................................5 II. Background ..................................................................................................6 A. Beach Water Quality & Health: the need for testing......................................................... 6 B. Establishment of the MDPH/BEHP Beaches Project ....................................................... 6 III. Beach Water Quality Monitoring...................................................................8 A. Sample collection..............................................................................................................8 B. Sample analysis................................................................................................................9 1. The MDPH contract laboratory program ...................................................................... 9 2. The use of indicators .................................................................................................... 9 3. Enterococci................................................................................................................... 10 4. E. coli...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts' Waters
    Photo: Supe87, Under license from Shutterstock.com from Supe87, Under license Photo: ToXIC WATERWAYS Mercury Pollution in Massachusetts’ Waters Lauren Randall Environment Massachusetts Research & Policy Center December 2011 Executive Summary Coal-fired power plants are the single larg- Human Services advises that all chil- est source of mercury pollution in the Unit- dren under twelve, pregnant women, ed States. Emissions from these plants even- women who may become pregnant, tually make their way into Massachusetts’ and nursing mothers not consume any waterways, contaminating fish and wildlife. fish from Massachusetts’ waterways. Many of Massachusetts’ waterways are un- der advisory because of mercury contami- Mercury pollution threatens public nation. Eating contaminated fish is the main health source of human exposure to mercury. • Eating contaminated fish is the main Mercury pollution poses enormous public source of human exposure to mercury. health threats. Mercury exposure during • Mercury is a potent neurotoxicant. In critical periods of brain development can the first two years of a child’s life, mer- contribute to irreversible deficits in verbal cury exposure can lead to irreversible skills, damage to attention and motor con- deficits in attention and motor control, trol, and reduced IQ. damage to verbal skills, and reduced IQ. • While adults are at lower risk of neu- In 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection rological impairment than children, Agency (EPA) developed and proposed the evidence shows that a low-level dose first national standards limiting mercury and of mercury from fish consumption in other toxic air pollution from existing coal- adults can lead to defects similar to and oil-fired power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocn370391905.Pdf (9.301Mb)
    r C A REGIONAL DEMONSTRATION PROJECT FOR r- Prepared by: MANAGEMENT OF URBAN RUNOFF Merrimack Valley Planning Commission [ Metropolitan Area Planning Council Pioneer Valley Planning Commission r L r r r L_ r PREPARED FOR L MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION r OFFICE OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT NONPOINT SOURCE PROGRAM AND r U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY L REGION I I I Clearing the Waters: A Regional Demonstration Project for I Management of Urban Runoff I Prepared by: Merrimack Valley Planning Commission I Metropolitan Area Planning Council Pioneer Valley Planning Commission I Prepared for: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection I Office of Watershed Management Nonpoint Source Program I and U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region I I Water Division, Water Quality Section I Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs I Trudy Coxe, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection I Thomas Powers, Acting Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection I Dean Spencer, Acting Assistant Commissioner I Office of Watershed Management Andrew Gottlieb, Director I July 1992 - September 1994 I This project has been financed partially with federal funds from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) under a S.319 Nonpoint Source Competitive grant The contents do not I necessarily reflect the views and policies of EPA or DEP, nor does the mention of trade I names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. I I I Acknowledgements I Connecticut River Demonstration Project Pioneer Valley Planning Commission Holyoke Urban Runoff Task Force I Project Manager: Christopher Curtis Jane Cameron, Planning Department Research & Writing: Carl Mailler Bill Fuqua, Department of Public Works Layout & Design: Shaun Hayes, Catherine Gibbs Karen Hirschberg, Conservation Commission I David Rundle, City Engineer Special thanks to: Springfield Urban Runoff task Force: I Bethany Eisenberg, Rizzo Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Outdoor Recreation Recreation Outdoor Massachusetts the Wildlife
    Photos by MassWildlife by Photos Photo © Kindra Clineff massvacation.com mass.gov/massgrown Office of Fishing & Boating Access * = Access to coastal waters A = General Access: Boats and trailer parking B = Fisherman Access: Smaller boats and trailers C = Cartop Access: Small boats, canoes, kayaks D = River Access: Canoes and kayaks Other Massachusetts Outdoor Information Outdoor Massachusetts Other E = Sportfishing Pier: Barrier free fishing area F = Shorefishing Area: Onshore fishing access mass.gov/eea/agencies/dfg/fba/ Western Massachusetts boundaries and access points. mass.gov/dfw/pond-maps points. access and boundaries BOAT ACCESS SITE TOWN SITE ACCESS then head outdoors with your friends and family! and friends your with outdoors head then publicly accessible ponds providing approximate depths, depths, approximate providing ponds accessible publicly ID# TYPE Conservation & Recreation websites. Make a plan and and plan a Make websites. Recreation & Conservation Ashmere Lake Hinsdale 202 B Pond Maps – Suitable for printing, this is a list of maps to to maps of list a is this printing, for Suitable – Maps Pond Benedict Pond Monterey 15 B Department of Fish & Game and the Department of of Department the and Game & Fish of Department Big Pond Otis 125 B properties and recreational activities, visit the the visit activities, recreational and properties customize and print maps. mass.gov/dfw/wildlife-lands maps. print and customize Center Pond Becket 147 C For interactive maps and information on other other on information and maps interactive For Cheshire Lake Cheshire 210 B displays all MassWildlife properties and allows you to to you allows and properties MassWildlife all displays Cheshire Lake-Farnams Causeway Cheshire 273 F Wildlife Lands Maps – The MassWildlife Lands Viewer Viewer Lands MassWildlife The – Maps Lands Wildlife Cranberry Pond West Stockbridge 233 C Commonwealth’s properties and recreation activities.
    [Show full text]