Election Code of Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Election Code of Georgia Strasbourg, 18 October 2005 CDL-EL(2005)033 Engl. Only Opinion no. 358 / 2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ELECTION CODE OF GEORGIA This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. Ce document ne sera pas distribué en réunion. Prière de vous munir de cet exemplaire. CDL-EL(2005)033 - 2 - General Section PART I CHAPTER I GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. Purpose of the Law This Law shall establish the legal basis for the preparation and conduct of elections of the President of Georgia, the Parliament of Georgia, the local self-government representative body – sakrebulo (local council), of gamgebel) (head of local government) and of a mayor. The Law shall also define the rights and guarantees of the election participants, the rules for forming the Election Administration and the competencies thereof, as well as the regulations for dispute resolution in the cases provided by this Law. Article 2. Legal Basis of Elections The legal basis for preparing and conducting elections of the President of Georgia, the Parliament of Georgia, the of local self-government representative body (local council) – sakrebulo, gamgebeli and mayor, shall be the Constitution of Georgia, universally recognised human rights principles and standards of international law, this Law, other legislative Acts and legal Acts of the Election Administration. Article 3. Definition of Terms For the purposes of this Law, the terms used herein shall have the following meaning: a. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Elections – for the purposes of this Law elections shall mean the election process aiming at and resulting in the election of the members of representative bodies of public authorities and public officials through universal elections; b. Elections conducted through proportional electoral system – election of members of Parliament and the local self-government representative body – sakrebulo, based on Party Lists; c. Elections conducted through majoritarian (first pass the post) electoral system – election of the members of parliament, election of sakrebulo members, of gamgebelis and mayors, by single-mandate or multi-mandate election districts; d. Right to vote – active and passive voting right; e. (14.08. 200. N 2965-ÒÓ) Active electoral right/suffrage – the right of a citizen to participate, through voting, in universal elections and a referendum held for electing people’s representatives in public representative bodies and public officials; f. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Passive electoral right/eligibility – the right of a citizen to be a candidate for the membership in a public representative body and run for the public office; - 3 - CDL-EL(2005)033 g. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ ) Electoral registration – the registration by the relevant Election Commission of the parties, electoral blocs, initiative groups of voters and candidates with the purpose of their participation in elections; h. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Election subject – a candidate nominated for a membership in a public representative body or a candidate for holding a public office, as well as the party, the election bloc and the initiative group of voters registered by the relevant Election Commission; i. Election Administration – the Central Election Commission of Georgia (CEC), the District Election Commissions (DEC) and the Precinct Election Commissions (PEC); j. Party – a political union of citizens, acting in accordance with the Organic Law of Georgia on Political Unions of Citizens, which is registered by the Central Election Commission of Georgia for the purpose of taking part in elections; k. Election bloc – a union of 2 or more Parties registered by the Central Election Commission of Georgia; l. Electoral campaign – a set of the measures undertaken by the candidates to becoming election subjects and by election subjects, for the purpose of participating in and winning elections; m. Election agitation – the action of Georgian citizens and election subjects calling upon the voters to support or to vote against election subjects; n. Candidate for the Presidency of Georgia – a citizen of Georgia, nominated by a Party registered by the Central Election Commission of Georgia, or by an initiative group of voters, as a candidate to run for the Presidency of Georgia; o. Party List Candidate – a citizen of Georgia included on a party listregistered by the Central Election Commission of Georgia with the purpose of taking part in the Parliamentary and local representative body – sakrebulo - elections; p. Majoritarian (first pass the post) candidate – a citizen of Georgia, nominated by the party (election bloc) or by the initiative group of voters (registered by the relevant Election Commission) in a specific electoral district as a candidate to run for the membership in the Parliament of Georgia or in the local government representative body – sakrebulo, or run for the office of a gamgebeli or a mayor; q. Candidate for the position of gamgebeli – a citizen of Georgia nominated by a Party (election bloc) or by an initiative group of voters for the office of a gamgebeli; r. Candidate for the position of a mayor – a citizen of Georgia nominated by a Party (election bloc) or by an initiative group of voters for the mayor’s office; s. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) General elections – the regular or off-year universal elections held with the purpose of electing a public representative body or public officials and in which, all voters established by this law as the voters for a representative body or voters to elect the public official, can participate; t. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Regular elections – the general elections to be held due to the expiration of the term of office of a public representative body or a public official within the timeframes established by the Constitution of Georgia, this Law, the Constitutions of the Abkhazia and Adjara autonomous republics and respective laws; CDL-EL(2005)033 - 4 - u. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Off-year elections – the general elections to be held due to the early expiration of the term of office of a public representative body or a public official; v. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Mid-term elections – the elections to be held with the purpose of filling up the vacancies in the public representative body; w. By- elections – the elections to be held on the entire territory of Georgia as regular elections in the event: a. the returns of the proportional elections held throughout Georgia have been invalidated and the law does not provide for the conduct of by- elections; b. the returns of the majority (first pass the post elections) held in the entire election district have been invalidated or returns were accepted, but no-one has been elected and the law does not provide for the onduc t the second round of elections; c. the elected individual has failed to present before the Central Election Commission a narcological (drug) test certificate and the elections returns were invalidated by the relevant decision of CEC; d. the election returns have been declared void by the court ruling (12.10.2004. #448); x. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Repeated ballot – the voting to be repeatedly held in those electoral precinct(s), where the ballot returns were declared void, or in the entire multi-mandate district based on the party lists, where no party/election bloc has won a mandate; y. Second round of elections –voting to be held in the cases and within the timeframes established by this Law in the event the first round of elections has not identified a winner; y¹. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) End of elections – the date of publication of the summary protocol of final election returns (including second-round elections and repeated ballots) as approved by the appropriate Election Commission; y². (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Election day – the day of holding general, mid-term or by-elections; y³. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Polling day – the day of holding elections, second ballot or second round of elections; z. Election documents – applications, complaints, letters, working papers, protocols, ballot papers, special envelopes, legal Acts of the Election Administration, voting licenses, control sheets, registration logs, voter lists, voter cards and other documents incoming to and outgoing from the Election Commissions; (12.10.2004. N488); z¹. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Packaging of documents –wrapping or packing the documents in a bale or in a box and sealing it so that it becomes impossible to remove or insert the documents from or into the bale/box without damaging the seal; z². (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Seal – a strip of paper attached to the places of opening of a voting device, document box, registration log, polling day record book, indicating the date and time of sealing and signed by individuals defined by this Law; aa. Representative body of local self-government – sakrebulo – the sakrebulo (the local council) of a village, community, township, city and the city out of the rayon (district) subordination; - 5 - CDL-EL(2005)033 ab. (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) Local constituency/electoral district – the part of an election district formed with the purpose of holding local self- government elections provided that the constituency comprises more than one local self-government unit; The local constituency comprises entire territory of the respective local self-government unit.” Article 31. Calculation of Timeframes Prescribed by this Law (14.08. 2003ß. N 2965-ÒÓ) 1. All periods prescribed by this Law, including the timeframes from the beginning until the completion of elections, the time-limits for lodging applications before and making ruling by courts shall be counted by calendar days (including the days off and holidays as prescribed by the Labour Code of Georgia). 2. In the expression "in N days after the elections", the words "after the elections" shall mean that counting of the days shall start from the end of elections.
Recommended publications
  • Elections Held and Mitigating Measures Taken During COVID-19 – As of October 21, 2020
    Featured Elections Held and Mitigating Measures Taken During COVID-19 – As of October 21, 2020 Contents Mitigating Measures During Recent Elections ................................................................................. 1 Other Mitigating Measures ............................................................................................................... 15 Mitigating Measures During Recent Elections This list focuses on some of the measures election management bodies (EMBs) around the globe are using when holding electoral activities amid COVID-19. The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) has not analyzed these mitigating measures for their effectiveness or desirability. Please contact IFES at [email protected] if you know of additional mitigating measures or believe any data in this resource to be inaccurate. Israel General Elections – March 4, 2020 Israelis under quarantine from the coronavirus voted at separate, tented-off polling locations. Paramedics “dressed in head-to-toe protective gear stood guard” at these designated polling stations, where election officials sat behind sheeted plastic to ensure voting operations went smoothly while staying protected.1 France Municipal Elections – Round 1 on March 15, 2020 On March 14, France introduced significant restrictions to curb the spread of COVID-19, such as banning gatherings of over 100 people, closing schools and nonessential shops and suspending sporting events. However, France continued to hold local elections on March 15. Proxy voting is permitted
    [Show full text]
  • Law on Elections of the President
    UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN “ON ELECTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN” (Bulletin of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1992, No. 1, Art. 34; Bulletin of the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 1998, No. 3, Art. 38; 1999, No 9, Art. 206; 2000, No 5-6, Art.153; Compilation of the Legislation of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 2004, No.51, Art. 514) Chapter I. General provisions Article 1. Elections of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan The election of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall be undertaken by the citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the basis of universal, equal and direct suffrage by secret voting. A citizen of the Republic of Uzbekistan, who has reached the age of thirty five, has an excellent command of the state language and resided permanently in the territory of Uzbekistan no less than ten years directly prior to the elections, can be elected as the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. The President of the Republic of Uzbekistan shall be elected for a term of five years. (the third part of the article 1 was amended by the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan from December 12, 2011, № LRUZ-306- The bulletin of the chambers of the Oliy Majlis, 2011, № 12/1, art.344) Article 2. Electoral rights of citizens The citizens of the Republic of Uzbekistan at the age of 18 shall have the right to participate in the election of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia
    Legislation: National Assemly of RA http://www.parliament.am/legislation.php?sel=show&ID=2020&lang=eng ELECTORAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA 05.02.1999 Non official translation PART ONE SECTION ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION TWO ELECTORAL COMMISSIONS SECTION THREE VOTING SUMMARIZATION OF THE VOTING RESULTS PART TWO SECTION FOUR ELECTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC CHAPTER THIRTEEN GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION FIVE ELECTIONS TO THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SECTION SIX ELECTIONS TO THE LOCAL SELF-GOVERNING BODIES PART ONE SECTION ONE GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER ONE FUNDAMENTAL PROVISIONS Article 1: Electoral Bases 1. In accordance with Article 3 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, elections of the President, elections to the National Assembly, elections of the local self-governing bodies of the Republic of Armenia are held through universal, equal, direct suffrage, by secret ballot. 2. Citizens of the Republic of Armenia having the right to vote participate in elections directly, by the expression of free will, on voluntary basis. 3. The state encourages that the elections of the President of the Republic, elections to National Assembly, local self-governing bodies are held under competitive and alternative principles. 4. The state holds responsibility for the preparation, organization and conduct of elections, and for the legality of elections. Article 2: Citizens' Electoral Right 1. The citizens of the Republic of Armenia who have attained the age of 18 years have the right to vote. 2. During the preparation and conduct of the elections, the citizens of the Republic of Armenia who live or are living outside Armenia, have the electoral right.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2019 Final DFID
    Governance Initiative Review Paper J-PAL Governance Initiative October 2019 This paper was primarily written by Benjamin A. Olken and Rohini Pande, with assistance from Adil Ababou, Alison Fahey, Yuen Ho, Gabriel Tourek, and Eliza Keller. We gratefully acknowledge funding support from DFID, the Hewlett Foundation, and an anonymous donor. The views expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of DFID, the Hewlett Foundation, or any other third party. Governance Initiative Review Paper Contents 1. What do we mean by governance? ............................................................................................ 5 2. Participation in the political and policy process ........................................................................ 7 2.1. Impacts of participation ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1. Impact on policy outcomes................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1.1. Participation as voters .................................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1.2. Participation as leaders ................................................................................................................ 9 2.1.1.3. Participation as community monitors ...........................................................................................11 2.1.1.4. Participation through decentralization .........................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter E-3.3 ELECTION ACT Election
    Chapter E-3.3 ELECTION ACT Election regulations © Chief Electoral Officer of Québec, 2015 Legal Deposit – Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec, 2015 Library and Archives of Canada ISBN 978-2-550-73074-3 (PDF version) Chapter E-3.3 ELECTION ACT Election regulations LE DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS DU QUÉBEC FOREWORD This edition contains the Election Act and the Election Regulations. Where it is intended to interpret or to enforce the Act or Regulations, the official wording published by the Éditeur officiel du Québec should be used. Me Lucie Fiset Chief Electoral Officer President of the “Commission de la représentation électorale” Updated May 1st , 2015 SUMMARY page Election Act.................................................................................................. 1 Election Regulations .................................................................................... 199 Election Calendar ......................................................................................... 277 ELECTION ACT INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE ELECTION ACT The Election Act (1989, c. 1), approved March 22, 1989 and effective April 24, 1989, except subparagraph 4 of the first paragraph of section 1 which came into force on April 15, 1990, has been modified by the following acts: 1990, c. 4 2001, c. 2 2011, c. 21 1991, c. 48 2001, c. 13 2011, c. 27 1991, c. 73 2001, c, 26 2011, c. 38 1992, c. 38 2001, c. 45 2012, c. 26 1992, c. 21 2001, c. 72 2013, c. 5 1992, c. 61 2002, c. 6 2013, c. 13 1994, c. 18 2002, c. 10 2013, c. 16 1994, c. 23 2004, c. 36 2015, c. 6 1995, c. 23 2005, c. 7 1996, c. 2 2006, c. 17 1997, c. 8 2006, c. 22 1998, c. 52 2007, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Code
    Act of 5 January, 2011 Election Code (Journal of Laws 31 January, 2011) Section I. Introductory provisions Chapter 1 General Provisions (Article 1 - Article 9) Chapter 2 Voting rights (Article 10 - Article 11) Chapter 3 Electoral Districts (Article 12 - Article 17) Chapter 4 The register of voters (Article 18 - Article 25) Chapter 5 Roll of voters (Article 26 - Article 37) Chapter 6 Common provisions on voting (Article 38 - Article 53) Chapter 7 Voting by proxy (Article 54 - Article 61) Chapter 8 Voting by correspondence in the electoral wards established abroad (Article 62 - Article 68) Chapter 9 Determining the results of voting in the circuit (Article 69 - Article 81) Chapter 10 Election protests (Article 82 - Article 83) Chapter 11 Electoral committees (Article 84 - Article 103) Chapter 12 The election campaign (Articles 104 - 115) Chapter 13 The election campaign in the programs of radio and television broadcasters (Article 116 - Article 122) Chapter 14 Funding of elections from the state budget (Article 123 - Article 124) Chapter 15 Financing of election campaigns (Article 125 - Article 151) Section III. Elections to the Sejm Chapter 1 General principles (Article 192 - Article 200) Chapter 2 Constituencies (Article 201 - Article 203) Chapter 3 Reporting of candidates for deputies (Article 204 - Article 222) Chapter 4 Ballot (Article 223 - Article 226) Chapter 5 The method of voting and the conditions of validity of the vote (Article 227) Chapter 6 Determination of voting results and election results in constituency (Article 228 - Article 237) Chapter 7 Announcement of results of elections to the Sejm (Article 238 - Article 240) Chapter 8 Validity of election (Article 241 - Article 246) Chapter 9 The expiration of the mandate of Mr and complement the composition of the Sejm (Article 247 - Article 251) Chapter 10 The election campaign in public programs, radio and television broadcasters (Article 252 - Article 254) Section IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Law on Elections of Deputies to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
    Federal Law On Elections of Deputies to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Adopted by State Duma February 14, 2014 Approved by Council of the Federation February 19, 2014 Amended: Federal law of 24.11.2014 Nо 355-FZ, 13.07.2015 Nо 231-FZ, 14.07.2015 Nо 272-FZ, 05.10.2015 Nо 287-FZ, 15.02.2016 Nо 29-FZ, 09.03.2016 No 66-FZ, 05.04.2016 No 92-FZ Table of Contents CHAPTER 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS .......................................................................................................... 4 Article 1. Basic Principles of Conducting Elections of Deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly.......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Article 2. Legislation on Elections of Deputies ................................................................................................. 5 Article 3. Electoral System........................................................................................................................................ 5 Article 4. Electoral Rights of Citizens ................................................................................................................... 5 Article 5. Announcement of Elections of Deputies ......................................................................................... 7 Article 6. Right to Nominate Candidates ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Bill Election
    FIRST SESSION THIRTY-SEVENTH LEGISLATURE Draft Bill Election Act Tabled by Mr. Jacques P. Dupuis Minister for the Reform of Democratic Institutions Québec Official Publisher 2004 1 EXPLANATORY NOTES This draft bill proposes to replace the current Election Act with a new one featuring more logically organized titles and chapters. The purpose of the draft bill is to regulate the organization and holding of free and democratic elections in accordance with the right of every person to vote and to run as a candidate. The main objectives of the draft bill are to encourage all electors to vote, ensure effective representation for all electors, taking into account that all votes are of equal weight, ensure equal opportunity for all candidates and parties during an election, particularly through equitable financing and efficient control of election spending, and encourage fair representation of women and ethnocultural minorities in the National Assembly that mirrors their demographic representation in Québec society. To that end, the draft bill proposes measures designed to facilitate the voting process, including – extending the revision period for the list of electors, setting up mobile boards of revisors and allowing revision requests to be filed by mail, fax or electronic means; – allowing voting in any of the offices set up by the returning officer in an electoral division over the entire electoral period; – allowing persons domiciled in Québec to vote by correspondence in the same manner as electors outside Québec; voting by correspondence will thus be possible for hospitalized persons, inmates, workers and students, among others; and – extending advance polling hours and allowing advance polling in private residences for the elderly.
    [Show full text]
  • Partisan Spatial Sorting in the United States: a Theoretical and Empirical Overview
    Partisan Spatial Sorting in the United States: A Theoretical and Empirical Overview Ethan Kaplan, University of Maryland Jörg L. Spenkuch, Northwestern University Rebecca Sullivan, University of Maryland April 2020 Abstract We document the evolution of geographic partisan sorting in the American electorate. Our analysis begins by proposing seven theoretical properties that are intuitively desir- able for a summary measure of voter sorting. We then formally prove that a variance- like index is the only measure that satises all desiderata. Using this index, we provide evidence that spatial cleavages have increased dramatically since the mid-twentieth centuryconsistent with the Big Sort hypothesis. At no point since the Civil War have partisans been as clustered within the boundaries of individual states as today. Nonetheless, even when geographic sorting is measured at the precinct level, dierences across communities tend to be signicantly smaller than dierences within. In this sense, the American electorate continues to be more diverse within than across areas. 1 1 Introduction According to journalists and pundits, ordinary Americans are not only divided in their allegiance to one of the two major parties, but partisan divisions also manifest themselves across space. Republican supporters live in red, rural states, while Democrats reside in blue, urban areas along the coasts. In fact, in a bestselling popular-science book, journalist Bill Bishop argues that Americans have become so clustered in like-minded communities that the resulting spatial ssures are tearing us apart (Bishop 2008). More specically, Bishop's Big Sort makes three claims. (1) There has been a large in- crease in the geographic clustering of partisans.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Laws Supplement
    \..,J ELECTION LAWS OF IOWA OCTOBER1999SUPPLEMENT ~ Published under the authority of Iowa Code chapter 2B by the Legislative Service Bureau GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF IOWA Des Moines ~ "'-:·· n· October 1999 Supplement INSTRUCTIONS FOR Updating Election Laws of Iowa Obsolete pages of Election Laws of Iowa are listed in the column headed "Remove Old Pages." New and replacement pages in this Supplement are listed in the column headed "Insert New Pages." It is important to follow instructions in both columns. Remove Old Pages Insert New Pages iii ............................................................ iii 1-6 ......................................................... 1-6 12a-12h ................................................. 12a-12j 133-136 ................................................. 133-136 141,142 .................................................. 141,142 151,152 .................................................. 151,152 159-162 ................................................. 159-162 165-166b ............................................... 165-166b 265-274b ............................................... 265-27 4b 277-284 ................................................. 277-284 none ....................................................... 320a,320b 326c-328b .............................................. 326c-328b 328e-328j .............................................. 328e-328j 391,392-394 .......................................... 391-394 412g,412h .............................................. 412g-412j 423,424 .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Concepts of Enclave and Exclave and Their Use
    www.ssoar.info The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Yuri Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Rozhkov-Yuryevsky, Y. (2013). The concepts of enclave and exclave and their use in the political and geographical characteristic of the Kaliningrad region. Baltic Region, 2, 113-123. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2013-2-11 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-351079 RESEARCH REPORTS This article focuses on the genesis of THE CONCEPTS and correlation between the related con- OF ENCLAVE cepts of enclave and exclave and the scope of their use in different sciences, fields of AND EXCLAVE knowledge, and everyday speech. The au- thor examines the circumstances of their AND THEIR USE emergence in the reference and professional IN THE POLITICAL literature in the Russian language. Special attention is paid to the typology of the AND GEOGRAPHICAL world’s enclave territories as objects of po- CHARACTERISTIC litical geography; at the same time, their new categories and divisions (international OF THE KALININGRAD enclave, overseas exclaves, internal en- claves of different levels) are extended and REGION introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Health Epidemics
    Working paper The political economy of health epidemics Evidence from the Ebola outbreak Elisa M. Maffioli January 2018 When citing this paper, please use the title and the following reference number: S-51208-LIB-1 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF HEALTH EPIDEMICS: EVIDENCE FROM THE EBOLA OUTBREAK ELISA M. MAFFIOLI? [CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST VERSION] Abstract. Health epidemics represent a unique test of governmental accountability. Com- pared to other disasters, the way the government responds is crucial to stop the contagion and limit the ultimate costs to citizens. However, political motives may distort the allocation of governmental resources. In this paper, I study the response of the Liberian government to the 2014 West Africa Ebola outbreak, and the subsequent effects on citizens’ voting behavior and political perceptions. I combine proprietary data on Ebola cases, novel surveys, and publicly available data on the government’s relief effort and post-outbreak Senatorial election. I first provide evidence of limited governmental response before the arrival of foreign aid, in contrast to improved assistance after aid was provided. I then build a spatio-temporal epidemiological model to estimate the ex-ante optimal allocation of relief effort. I find that the government mis- allocated resources towards swing villages affected by the contagion. Voters in turn reacted to the differential response: the incumbent party lost political support in areas hit in the first part of the epidemic, while it did not lose votes in areas hit in the second part and in swing villages. I conclude by discussing the costs to citizens of the political misallocation of resources.
    [Show full text]