Proust and Cinema, Or Luchino Visconti's Search
Proust and Cinema, or Luchino Visconti's Search By Chesney, Duncan McColl PUBLICATION:Post Script VOLUME/ISSUE:Vol. 23, No. 2 PUBLICATION DATE: Spring 2004 PAGES: 48-55 Il est absurde de s'indigner des degradations subies par les chefs-d'oeuvre litteraires a l'ecran, du moins au nom de la litterature. Car, si approximatives que soient les adaptations, elles ne peuvent faire tort a l'original aupres de la minorite qui le connait et l' apprecie; quant aux ignorants, de deux choses l'une: ou bien ils se contenteront du film, qui en vaut certainement un autre, ou bien ils auront envie de connaitre le module, et c'est autant de gagne pour la litterature. Andre Bazin, "Pour un cinema impur" (1) Andre Bazin's early insight in defense of film adaptation ought to have spared us a great deal of the critical chatter of which the discussion around Raoul Ruiz's Le temps retrouve (1999) is only the most recent example. It is this very debate, however, that has occupied Proustians and cinephiles alike every time the audacious idea of adapting Proust has surfaced in the film world. A novel and a film belong to two different and equally complex semiotic systems, each with its own semi-autonomous history as well as its own sociological and economic motivations. Whence, then, the unease at the idea of adaptation of literary classics, especially at a point when film has definitively overtaken the novel as the quintessential mode of cultural expression, reproduction and self-critique? For those who still hold on to the Modernist legitimacy and dignity of the novel Bazin's frank remark seems to speak the awkward truth, even in a stream-lined age of monster media conglomerates whose literary classic film tie-ins serve, like the films themselves, as much to line the coffers of the media moguls as to keep alive the great cultural inheritance of earlier epochs of art.
[Show full text]