DOCSLIB.ORG

Faclair Airson Riaghaltas Ionadail Gàidhlig Agus Beurla

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Faclair Airson Riaghaltas Ionadail Gàidhlig Agus Beurla Faclair airson Riaghaltas Ionadail Gàidhlig agus Beurla Dictionary for Local Government Scottish Gaelic and English Air a chur ri chèile le Compiled by The European Language Initiative a bhuineas do mhodh : a thogas meanmna ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ a ghabhas leasachadh a nì bacadh br a rinneadh leis a‟ phrìomhaire remediable, obstructionist, prime-ministerial adj retrievable adj obstructive adj gnìomh a rinneadh leis suidheachadh a ghabhas innleachdan a nì bacadh a‟ phrìomhaire leasachadh obstructionist tactics a prime-ministerial action a retrievable situation à seo suas cgr A a nì mì-rian br adv hence a ghabhas obrachadh disruptive adj a bhuineas do mhodh viable adj giùlan a nì mì-rian procedural adj a sheallas inbhe moladh a ghabhas obrachadh disruptive behaviour prestigious adj a viable proposition a bhuineas don bhuidseat budgetary adj a rèir roi a sheasas na aonar a lìonas beàrn according to, stand-alone adj a bhuineas don phrìomhaire stop-gap adj relative (to) prep buidheann a sheasas na aonar a stand-alone body prime-ministerial adj a rèir an lagha according to law a mhair fada br a bhuineas don tuath luachan a rèir a chèile a tha a‟ tighinn a-steach br prolonged adj provincial adj relative values incoming adj thug am pàrtaidh dùbhlain cha tig na h-argamaidean ionnsaigh air an riaghaltas a mhair a dh‟aindeoin roi le gin a rèir a chèile a thaobh roi le gin fada notwithstanding adv the arguments are mutually exclusive in pursuance of, the opposition made a prolonged a dh‟aindeoin nan gearan with reference to, attack on the government notwithstanding the objections with respect to a rèir ceartais br justifiable adj a ghabhas a thoirt gu crìoch br a nì ar-a-mach br a thèid air thùs terminable adj revolutionary adj pioneering adj reachdas a thèid air thùs a rèir sin cgr a ghabhas ais-ghairm (ghnothaichean) a nì ath-aithris br proportionately adv repealable adj pioneering legislation repetitive adj a ghabhas a-steach a rèir solair a thogas meanmna inclusive adj a nì ath-leasachadh br supply-driven adj uplifting adj reforming adj tionnsgnadh a tha a rèir òraid a thogas meanmna a ghabhas cùl-ghairm dealas airson ath-leasachaidh an t-solair (aignidhean) dhaoine revocable adj reforming zeal a supply-driven initiative an uplifting speech a thogas teachd-a-steach : Achd Lùghdachaidh Trafaig Rathaidean / Ròidean (Cuimsean Nàiseanta) ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ a thogas teachd-a-steach Achd (boir) (Cothrom Achd (boir) Chorparaidean Achd (boir) Dìon air Longan Briste revenue-generating adj Fiosrachaidh) Leasachaidh Bhailtean Ùra Protection of Wrecks Act n Co-chomataidhean agus Bailteil Achd (boir) Dìon Dàta a thoradh air teisteanas Co-chomhairleachaidh Seirbheis New Towns and Urban Development Data Protection Act n qualified adj Corporations Act n na Slàinte (having gained certification) Health Service Joint Achd (boir) Còmhdhail agus Achd (boir) Dìon Rèididheachd Consultative Committees Obraichean Radiological Protection Act n A‟ Chuimrigh boir (Access to Information) Act n Transport and Works Act n Wales n Achd (boir) (na) Teàrainteachd Achd (boir) Foghlaim Sgoiltean-àraich agus Shòisealta Achd (boir) Cosgaisean a‟ Mhàil Sgoiltean Tabhartais A‟ Ghàidhealtachd Social Security Act n Rent Charges Act n Nursery Education and Grant Highland n (region) Maintained Schools Act n Achd (boir) a‟ Mhàil Achd (boir) Dealbhaidh Rent Act n (Stuthan Cunnartach) Achd (boir) Fuaim agus Gràine abaich br Planning (Hazardous Substances) Achd (boir) an Aonaidh Reachdail mature adj Act n Act of Union n Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act n abaich br Achd (boir) an Dàimh Chinnidh Achd (boir) Dealbhaidh Achd (boir) Glanaidh Sgudail mature v Race Relations Act n (Togalaichean air Liosta agus (Goireas-taitneis) Àrainnean Glèidhteachais) Refuse Disposal (Amenity) Act n Achd (boir) an Fhoghlaim Planning (Listed Buildings and abaichead fir Education Act n Conservation Areas) Act n maturity n Achd (boir) Gual nam Mèinnean Fosgailte Achd (boir) an Fhuaim Achd (boir) Dealbhaidh agus Noise Act n Open Cast Coal Act n àbhaist boir Dìolaidh norm n Achd (boir) Atharrachaidh Planning and Compensation Act n Achd (boir) Leasachaidh Baile Làraichean Adhraidh Town Development Act n Achd (boir) Dealbhaidh Baile is acainn-smàlaidh (boir) theine Places of Worship Sites fire fighting equipment n Amendment Act n Dùthcha Achd (boir) Lùghdachaidh Town and Country Planning Act n Trafaig Rathaidean / Ròidean Achd (boir) Atharrachaidh (Cuimsean Nàiseanta) Achd boir Slàinte a‟ Phobaill Achd (boir) Dìon air Cur à Taigh Road Traffic Reduction (National Act n Public Health Amendment Act n Protection from Eviction Act n Targets) Act n Achd na Còmhdhalach : Achd Trèanaidh Bodhaig agus Chur-seachad ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Achd (boir) na Còmhdhalach Achd (boir) nam Achd (boir) nan Stuthan Achd (boir) Sheirbheisean Slàinte Transport Act n Pìob-loidhneachan Rèidio-beò agus Slàinte a‟ Phobaill Pipelines Act n Radioactive Substance Act n Health Services and Achd (boir) na h-Eòrpa Shingilte Public Health Act n Single European Act n Achd (boir) nam Puinnsean Achd (boir) Nursaichean, Poisons Act n Achd (boir) Slàinte a‟ Phobaill Achd (boir) na Rèile Bhan-ghlùine agus Public Health Act n Railways Act n Luchd-tadhail Slàinte Achd (boir) nan Àiteachan Nurses, Midwives and Achd (boir) na Slàinte agus Fosgailte Health Visitors Act n Achd (boir) Slàinte a‟ Phobaill Seirbheisean Sòisealta agus Open Spaces Act n (Drèanadh Thogalaichean Ciùird) Breithneachaidhean Dìon Achd (boir) Oifis a‟ Phuist Public Health (Drainage of Trade Post Office Act n Premises) Act n Shòisealta Achd (boir) nan Ciontach a thaobh Health and Social Services and Trafaig Rathaidean / Ròidean Achd (boir) Pàrlamaid Social Security Adjudications Act n Road Traffic Offenders Act n Achd (boir) Slàinte a‟ Phobaill Act (n) of Parliament (Smachd air Galaran) Achd (boir) na Slàinte is Achd (boir) nan Dachaighean Public Health (Control of Diseases) Achd (boir) Phrìobhaideach Chungaidhean-leighis Clàraichte Act n Health and Medicines Act n Registered Homes Act n Pàrlamaid Private Act (n) of Parliament Achd (boir) Smachdachaidh Achd (boir) na Slàinte is Dìon Trafaig Rathaidean / Ròidean Achd (boir) nan Gabhaltas Beaga Achd (boir) Riaghailteachaidh Shòisealta Road Traffic Reduction Act n agus nan Cuibhreann Talmhainn Trafaig Rathaidean / Ròidean Health and Social Security Act n Smallholdings and Allotments Act n Road Traffic Regulation Act n Achd (boir) Teagaisg agus Achd (boir) na Slàinte is Achd (boir) nan Leabharlannan is Achd (boir) Riochdachaidh Àrd-fhoghlaim Sàbhailteachd san Àite-obrach Teaching and Higher Education Act n Health and Safety at Work Act n nan Taighean-tasgaidh Poblach an t-Sluaigh Public Libraries and Museums Representation of the People Act n Achd (boir) nam Bailtean Ùra Act n Achd (boir) Trafaig nan New Towns Act n Achd (boir) Saidheans agus Rathaidean / Ròidean Achd (boir) nan Rùintean- Teicneòlais Road Traffic Act n Achd (boir) nam Buidhnean dìomhair Oifigeil Science and Technology Act n Poblach (Cead Coinneamhan a Official Secrets Act n Achd (boir) Trèanaidh Bodhaig Fhrithealadh) Achd (boir) saorsa an agus Chur-seachad Public Bodies (Admissions to Achd (boir) nan Stòr-amaran Fhiosrachaidh Physical Training and Recreation Meetings) Act n Reservoirs Act n Freedom of Information Act n Act n Achd Ùghdarras Ionadail (Alba) 1973 : ainmeachadh ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Achd (boir) Ùghdarras Ionadail adhbhar èiginneach agartas fir aimhreit boir (Alba) 1973 a compelling reason representations npl dispute n (dissension) Local Government (Scotland) adhbhar deasbaid Act 1973 n bone of contention aghaidh boir aimhreit (boir) gnìomhachais facade n industrial dispute n Achd (boir) Ùghdarrasan Slàinte adhbharaich br Health Authorities Act n lead (to), agus a chaochladh aimhreiteach br occasion, vice versa adv argumentative adj achdachadh fir cause v adhbharaich duilgheadas enactment n (of a bill) àicheadh fir aimsireil br to pose a problem denial n temporal adj adhbharachadh gun deach achmhasan fir na Morairean Aimsireil aithisg ullachadh rebuke n àicheidh br the Lords Temporal to lead to the preparation of a report deny v còmhradh adhbharachadh acranaim fir to occasion comment aineolach br acronym n àidseant fir ill-informed adj agent n (in an election) beachd aineolach adhartach br agallaiche fir an ill-informed comment interviewer n progressive adj ailtire fir architect n aingidh br adhartachadh (fir) gnìomhachais agallamh fir ailtire deilbh-thalmhainn wicked, industrial promotion n interview n landscape architect heinous adj àite-agallaimh interview area adhartas fir ailtireachd boir ainilis (boir) prògraim progress n architecture n programme analysis n agartach br ailtireachd coimhearsnachd adhbhar fir litigious adj community architecture ainm (fir) sgrìobhte occasion, ailtireachd dhachaigheil domestic architecture signature n purpose, agartach fir ailtireachd talmhainn reason n litigant n cha robh adhbhar againn riamh landscape architecture ainmeachadh fir teagamh a chur na chliù nomination n we never had occasion
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unit 7 Electoral Systems and Electoral Processes
    Electoral Systems and Electoral UNIT 7 ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND Processes ELECTORAL PROCESSES Structure 7.0 Objectives 7.1 Introduction 7.2 Classification of electoral systems 7.3 Majoritarian Systems 7.3.1 First-Past-the-Post/ Single-Member Plurality system 7.3.2 Second Ballot System 7.3.3 Alternative Vote (AV)/ Supplementary Vote (SV) system 7.3.4 Condorcet Method 7.4 Proportional Representation Systems 7.4.1 Single-Transferable-Vote (STV) System 7.4.2 Party-List System 7.5 Mixed Methods 7.5.1 Mixed-Member Proportional or Additional Member System 7.5.2 Semi-Proportional Method 7.5.3 Cumulative Vote System 7.5.4 Slate System 7.6 Comparative Assessment of Majoritarian and PR Systems 7.7 Let Us Sum Up 7.8 References 7.9 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises Dr. Tulika Gaur, Guest Faculty, Non-Collegiate Women's Education Board, University of Delhi, Delhi 97 Representation and Political 7.0 OBJECTIVES Participation An electoral system does not only set rules for election, but also plays crucial role in shaping the party system and political culture of the country. This unit focuses on electoral systems and processes. After going through this unit, you should be able to: Define electoral system, Identify the various dimensions of an electoral system, Assess combinations of electoral methods used by different countries in their national or local elections, Examine the advantages and disadvantages of different kinds of electoral systems, and Analyse the links between parties and electoral process. 7.1 INTRODUCTION The electoral system refers to a set of rules through which people get to choose their representatives or political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Reform in Canada: the Shape of Things to Come an Executive Summary March 2016
    Electoral Reform in Canada: The Shape of Things to Come An Executive Summary March 2016 We are committed to ensuring that 2015 will be the last federal election conducted under the first- past- the- post voting system. As part of a national engagement process, we will ensure that electoral reform measures—such as ranked ballots, proportional representation, mandatory voting, and online voting—are fully and fairly studied and considered .... Within 18 months of forming government, we will bring forward legislation to enact electoral reform. —Justin Trudeau, Real Change: A Fair and Open Government ABOUT THIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Public Services Foundation of Canada and the National Union of Public and General Employees have prepared a comprehensive discussion paper based on a survey of the literature and polling and focus group results, which will be published at a later date. This executive summary provides an overview of the main points without the inclusion of the research, position paper, or polling results. Electoral Reform in Canada: The Shape of Things to Come Executive Summary The Canadian Debate Justin Trudeau promised during the election that this would be the last federal election to use the unfair first-past-the-post (FPTP) system. Although he has indicated that other voting systems would be considered, Trudeau has indicated that his preferred proposal is a version of the single transferable vote (STV) that uses a ranked ballot. His critics say that when STV is used in single member ridings, it is really just an alternative vote (AV) system, also known as an instant run-off system, and the result would be even more unfair in its outcome than FPTP.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Reform “Regardless of Electoral System, There Will Always
    Electoral Reform “Regardless of electoral system, there will always be opposing views as to advantages and disadvantages of each” Submitted by SR-F 06 September 2016 Because elections and referenda require a high level of voter awareness and responsibility, civic participation in governance must be encouraged in order that Canada’s Democracy becomes one that protects liberties, particularly communal liberties, rather than simply emphasizing individual Rights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMIbH5D0waA Direct Democracy would be the ideal voting system because it allows citizens to participate in most every aspect of governance through initiatives/voting/referenda... laws and changes to the national constitution being voted on by the citizenry affording them a much greater measure of control over political minutiae. Switzerland is the most prominent modern democracy to use elements of Direct Democracy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_in_Switzerland with versions of it at State and local levels in the USA. As opposed to direct democracy, some version of Representative Democracy , founded on the principle of elected officials representing a group of people (includes Referendum/Initiatives/Recall that provide limited Direct Democracy), would appear to be more practical for Canada at this point in time. Present System : FPTP - Plurality In “winner-take-all" electoral systems, generally just two parties end up competing in national elections, forcing political discussions into a narrow two-party frame where loyalty and party line assertions can distort political debate, voters left undecided as to where to place their vote. When FPTP Voters realise that their preferred candidate cannot win, knowing that their vote won’t count or will be wasted, they have little incentive to vote.
    [Show full text]
  • GUIDELINES to ASSIST NATIONAL MINORITY PARTICIPATION in the ELECTORAL PROCESS Guidelines for Electoral Process.Qxd 03-05-06 11:39 Page 1
    Cover Minority #1 08.09.2003 14:22 Uhr Seite 1 GUIDELINES TO ASSIST NATIONAL MINORITY PARTICIPATION IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS Guidelines_for_Electoral_Process.qxd 03-05-06 11:39 Page 1 GUIDELINES TO ASSIST NATIONAL MINORITY PARTICIPATION IN THE ELECTORAL PROCESS Guidelines_for_Electoral_Process.qxd 03-05-06 11:39 Page 2 Published by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) Aleje Ujazdowskie 19 00-557 Warsaw Poland www.osce.org/odihr © OSCE/ODIHR 2001 Reprint 2003 All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non-commercial purposes, provided that any such reproduction be accompanied by an acknowledgement of the OSCE/ODIHR as the source. Guidelines_for_Electoral_Process.qxd 03-05-06 11:39 Page 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION . 5 2. BACKGROUND TO THE LUND RECOMMENDATIONS . 7 3. THE IMPORTANCE OF PROCESS . 9 4. INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK . 11 5. LUND RECOMMENDATION ON ELECTIONS: NO. 7 . 15 5.1 Content Explanation . 15 5.1.1 The individual rights to participate in elections . 16 5.1.2 The prohibition against discrimination . 20 5.2 Legal Framework and Options . 22 6. LUND RECOMMENDATION ON ELECTIONS: NO. 8 . 24 6.1 Content Explanation . 24 6.2 Legislative Framework . 27 7. LUND RECOMMENDATION ON ELECTIONS: NO. 9 . 28 7.1 Content Explanation . 28 7.2 Legislative Framework and Options . 31 7.3 Other Mechanisms . 38 8. LUND RECOMMENDATION ON ELECTIONS: NO. 10 . 40 8.1 Content Explanation . 40 8.1.1 District magnitude . 40 8.1.2 Territorial delimitation . 41 9. ENSURING FAIR CONDUCT OF ELECTIONS: THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE ELECTIONS .
    [Show full text]
  • The Supplementary Vote Electoral System Again Worked Very Well in London
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/23468 The Supplementary Vote electoral system again worked very well in London. There is no basis for arguing that voters don’t understand their choices Blog Admin A recent article on the London mayoral election suggested that the way the public voted showed that a majority of people did not understand the voting system used. Patrick Dunleavy explains why this criticism of the voting system is quite unfounded. Looking back at the mayoral election in London, James Ball writing in the Guardian Comment section outlines some problems as he sees it with the Supplementary Vote system used to elect London’s powerf ul mayor. He writes: The vast majority of voters decided to use their second preference vote: 1.76 million second preferences were cast, around 80% of the electorate. But only around one in 10 of these were actually counted towards the total. Of the 346,000 or so people who voted for one of the minority candidates, only 185,000 actually cast their vote in such a way as to influence the result. More than 1.1 million people cast their second preference for a candidate with no chance of being in the run-off for the final two. There are two ways to interpret the figures: a large portion of Londoners don’t fully understand the voting system, or they are using it in a remarkably sophisticated way to send subtle signals to minority candidates. If this was the case, there does seem to be a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Systems in the UK
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 04458, 26 October 2017 By Neil Johnston Voting systems in the UK Inside: 1. Current voting systems 2. Electoral systems in the UK – recent developments 3. Previous government reviews of electoral systems 4. International comparisons www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary Number 04458, 26 October 2017 2 Contents Summary 3 1. Current voting systems 4 1.1 First Past the Post (FPTP) 4 1.2 Alternative Vote (AV) 4 1.3 Supplementary Vote 4 1.4 Single Transferable Vote (STV) 5 1.5 Additional Member System 5 1.6 Closed Party List System 6 1.7 Table showing where the voting systems are used in the UK 7 2. Electoral systems in the UK – recent developments 8 2.1 The AV Referendum 8 2.2 Directly electing members of the National Park authorities in England 9 2.3 Devolution of elections to Wales 10 2.4 2017 manifesto commitments 10 3. Previous government reviews of electoral systems 12 3.1 Report of the Independent Commission on the Voting System [October 1998] 12 3.2 Review of Voting Systems: the experience of new voting systems in the United Kingdom since 1997 [January 2008] 12 4. International comparisons 15 4.1 First Past the Post 15 4.2 Additional Member Systems – Germany and New Zealand 15 4.3 Two Round Systems – France 15 4.4 AV – Australia and Ireland 16 4.5 STV – Ireland 16 4.6 List Systems 16 Cover page image copyrightTo the polling station by Matt. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Rules and Democratic Electoral Rules, and Governance Democratic Governance Edited by Mala Htun and G
    Report of the Political Science, Task Force on Electoral Rules and Democratic Electoral Rules, and Governance Democratic Governance Edited by Mala Htun and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE AssOCIATION n TasK FORCE REPORT, SEPTEMBER 2013 Political Science, Electoral Rules, and Democratic Governance Report of the Task Force on Electoral Rules and Democratic Governance Edited by Mala Htun and G. Bingham Powell, Jr. SEPTEMBER 2013 AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE AssOCIATION 1527 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036-1206 Copyright © 2013 by the American Political Science Association. All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-1-878147-41-7 Task Force on Electoral Rules and Democratic Governance Task Force Members Mala Htun, University of New Mexico, Chair G. Bingham Powell, Jr., University of Rochester; President, APSA, 2011–12 John Carey, Dartmouth College Karen E. Ferree, University of California, San Diego Simon Hix, London School of Economics Mona Lena Krook, Rutgers University Robert G. Moser, University of Texas, Austin Shaheen Mozaffar, Bridgewater State University Andrew Rehfeld, Washington University in St. Louis Andrew Reynolds, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill Ethan Scheiner, University of California, Davis Melissa Schwartzberg, Columbia University Matthew S. Shugart, University of California, Davis ii American Political Science Assocation Table of Contents TASK FORCE MEMBERS ............................................................................................................................. ii LIST OF
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Party Politics of Political Decentralization Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jw6f00k Author Wainfan, Kathryn Tanya Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Party Politics of Political Decentralization A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 c Copyright by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Party Politics of Political Decentralization by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Michael F. Thies, Chair In this dissertation, I ask why certain types of parties would agree to support creating or empowering sub-national governments. In particular, I focus on nationalized parties { those that gain support from throughout a country. Political decentralization can negatively impact nationalized parties in at least two ways. First, it reduces the amount of power a party can enjoy should it win control of the national-level government. Second, previous studies show that political decentralization can increase party denationalization, meaning regional parties gain more support, even during national-level elections. I argue that nationalized parties may support decentralization when doing so reduces the ideological conflicts over national-level policy among voters whose support they seek. By altering political institutions, a party may be able to accommodate differing policy prefer- ences in different parts of the country, or limit the damage to the party's electoral fortunes such differences could create.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTING the FIRST PARLIAMENT Party Competition and Voter Participation in Scotland
    PARTY POLITICS VOL 10. No.2 pp. 213–233 Copyright © 2004 SAGE Publications London Thousand Oaks New Delhi www.sagepublications.com ELECTING THE FIRST PARLIAMENT Party Competition and Voter Participation in Scotland Steven E. Galatas ABSTRACT Theory regarding turnout in elections suggests that voters are more likely to vote when their vote could be decisive. The article provides a generalized test of the relationship between the likelihood of turning out and the closeness of elections. Data are single-member district (first- past-the-post) and regional (party list) constituency-level results from the Scottish Parliament election of 1999. Scotland provides an excellent case because the 1999 Scottish Parliament was elected using a combi- nation of single-member districts, plus an additional member, regional list alternative vote system. In addition, the Scottish Parliament election was characterized by regional, multiparty competition. Controlling for other factors, the article finds that closeness counts and relates to higher levels of voter participation in the Scottish Parliament elections. This finding holds for single-member district (first-past-the-post) constituen- cies and additional member regional lists. KEY WORDS electoral competition Scottish Parliament voter turnout In 1999, Scottish voters went to the polls for the first time to elect a Scottish Parliament. Although Scotland had a legislative body prior to the Treaty of Union of 1707, the new Parliament created in 1999 was the first democrat- ically elected Scottish Parliament. Elections to the Scottish Parliament featured a deviation from the single-member district-plurality system (SMD-P) familiar to Scottish voters from other electoral contests. Instead, voters selected Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) using an additional member system (AMS).
    [Show full text]
  • THE 2017 GENERAL ELECTION Volatile Voting, Random Results
    FAIR FRANCHISE THE 2017 GENERAL ELECTION Volatile voting, random results JESS GARLAND & CHRIS TERRY AUGUST 2017 CONTENTS Introduction 5 1. The third strike for First Past the Post 9 2. No return to two-party politics 15 3. Divisive system, divided country 19 4. Alternatives 29 Conclusion 35 Appendix 36 ELECTORAL REFORM SOCIETY 3 INTRODUCTION The 2017 General Election was the third strike for the First Past the Post voting system. From producing a hung Parliament in 2010 – something not meant to happen under Westminster’s winner-takes-all voting system – to a slim majority in 2015, the way we elect our House of Commons isn’t doing the one thing it was claimed to be good for – delivering decisive results. This June’s election outcome throws up yet more questions about the legitimacy of our voting system. Our report shows how far from being ‘strong and stable’, First Past the Post is failing to deliver for the public. With one in five voters trying to second-guess each other by opting for ‘lesser evils’, we are left with a lottery election where casting a ballot is like casting a die. Not only have the last three elections either produced hung par- liaments or results so unrepresentative they demean the electoral process (2015 was the most disproportionate in British history), the last two have seen the highest ‘voter volatility’ since 1931. Our voting system is failing to keep up and is undermining the faith voters have that seats in Parliament will reflect the votes they cast. This lottery approach to running elections means we have no idea what will happen or how votes will be reflected in our elected Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Mixed-Member Proportional Representation in Scotland and Wales: Lessons from Germany?
    The Impact of Mixed-Member Proportional Representation in Scotland and Wales: Lessons from Germany? Thomas Carl Lundberg Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) Working Paper 20 © Thomas Carl Lundberg, 2003 ISSN 1475-1569 ISBN 1-899488-18-9 KEPRU Working Papers are published by: School of Politics, International Relations and the Environment (SPIRE) Keele University Staffs ST5 5BG, UK Tel +44 (0)1782 58 4177/3088/3452 Fax +44 (0)1782 58 3592 www.keele.ac.uk/depts/spire/ Editor: Professor Thomas Poguntke ([email protected]) KEPRU Working Papers are available via SPIRE’s website. Launched in September 2000, the Keele European Parties Research Unit (KEPRU) was the first research grouping of its kind in the UK. It brings together the hitherto largely independent work of Keele researchers focusing on European political parties, and aims: • to facilitate its members' engagement in high-quality academic research, individually, collectively in the Unit and in collaboration with cognate research groups and individuals in the UK and abroad; • to hold regular conferences, workshops, seminars and guest lectures on topics related to European political parties; • to publish a series of parties-related research papers by scholars from Keele and elsewhere; • to expand postgraduate training in the study of political parties, principally through Keele's MA in Parties and Elections and the multinational PhD summer school, with which its members are closely involved; • to constitute a source of expertise on European parties and party politics for media and other interests. The Unit shares the broader aims of the Keele European Research Centre, of which it is a part.
    [Show full text]
  • First Past the Post (FPTP), Also Known As Simple Majority Voting Or Plurality Voting
    First Past the Post First Past The Post (FPTP), also known as Simple majority voting or Plurality voting How does First Past The Post work? Under First Past The Post (FPTP) voting takes place in single-member constituencies. Voters put a cross in a box next to their favoured candidate and the candidate with the most votes in the constituency wins. All other votes count for nothing. We believe FPTP is the very worst system for electing a representative government. Where is First Past The Post used? FPTP is the second most widely used voting system in the world, after Party List-PR. In crude terms, it is used in places that are, or once were, British colonies. Of the many countries that use First Past The Post , the most commonly cited are the UK to elect members of the House of Commons, both chambers of the US Congress, and the lower houses in India and Canada. First Past The Post used to be even more widespread, but many countries that used to use it have adopted other systems. Find out more about reform overseas... Pros and cons of First Past The Post The case for The arguments against It's simple to understand and thus Representatives can get elected on tiny amounts of public support as it doesn't cost much to administer. does not matter by how much they win, only that they get more votes than other candidates. It doesn't take very long to count It encourages tactical voting, as voters vote not for the candidate they all the votes and work out who's most prefer, but against the candidate they most dislike.
    [Show full text]