Responsibilities of the Music Executive
Chapter II Responsibilities of the Music Executive Frederick Miller, Dean Emeritus School of Music, DePaul University Administrative Organization in Academia In virtually all academic institutions, ultimate authority rests with a governing board, that is, trustees, regents, whatever. As a practical matter, much of the board’s authority is delegated to the president, who retains as much as he or she needs to do the job and passes along the rest to the next person in the institutional chain of command, typically the provost. That person, in turn, keeps what is needed for that office and gives the rest to the deans and department chairs in this downward flow of authority in academia. Whatever title the music executive may hold—dean, chair, and so on—the position will typically be thought of as “middle management.” Others in the academic hierarchy— president, provost, vice presidents—are seen as “upper management,” and as some cynics might view it, hardly anyone is lower than a dean. However accurate this may be, mid-level administrative positions in higher education possess an unmistakable fragility. It stems from the fact that while we may be tenured in our faculty positions, at some professorial rank, we are not tenured in our administrative positions. We are positioned in the hierarchy between faculty, many or most of whom are tenured in their roles, and the upper administration, who typically are less subject to periodic, formal review. We spend much of our time in adversarial relationships with one of these groups on behalf of the other. That is, we may be pressing the upper administration on behalf of some faculty need.
[Show full text]