DOCSLIB.ORG

Explaining the Pattern of the Dprk‟S Foreign Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EXPLAINING THE PATTERN OF THE DPRK‟S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD MAJOR STATES: AN ANALYSIS OF DOMESTIC POLICY PRIORITIES OF NORTH KOREA ON FOREIGN POLICY by SUKHOON HONG (Under the Direction of Han S. Park) ABSTRACT This dissertation starts with the question of what factors influence whether North Korea chooses to implement risky or cooperative policies toward major states, as well as what role domestic politics and ideology play in the DPRK‟s formation and enactment of foreign policy. This study also seeks to explain why North Korea chooses a hard line foreign policy and when it chooses to engage with surrounding states. To find answers to these questions, the domestic priorities behind foreign policies are analyzed within the framework of human needs development theory. In this theory, North Korean foreign policy goals are motivated by three domestic priorities or preferences: security, identity and prosperity. This study set up three hypotheses based on this theoretical framework. The hypotheses assumed that the DPRK‟s foreign policy is determined primarily by the demands of “national security” relative to the U.S.; North Korea‟s foreign policy toward South Korea is determined by the “identity need”; Pyongyang‟s foreign policy toward China is mostly based on a desire for “economic prosperity.” In order to test these hypotheses, this study employs the “process-tracing” method, and also observes the official newspaper of Pyongyang regime, through content analysis in order to determine the DPRK‟s perception and policy preference toward major states such as the United States, South Korea and China. From the theoretical standpoint, this study proposes that North Korea is not abnormal or atypical, that is, the foreign policy goals of North Korea are not drastically different from any other country. First of all, one must understand that the essential ideologies of Juche and Songun and historical experiences have formed the preferences of Pyongyang‟s leadership. It is clear that the DPRK‟s domestic priorities have great influence on its foreign policy toward major governments, more so than external pressures and direct diplomatic interactions. This study implies that, within it‟s the context of its own history and perceptions, Pyongyang has acted rationally in regard to its goals and strategic interest. INDEX WORDS: North Korean Foreign Policy, Human Needs, Security, Identity, Prosperity, U.S.-DPRK Relations, Inter-Korea Relations, Sino-DPRK Relations. EXPLAINING THE PATTERN OF THE DPRK‟S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD MAJOR STATES: AN ANALYSIS OF DOMESTIC POLICY PRIORITIES OF NORTH KOREA ON FOREIGN POLICY by SUKHOON HONG B.A., Sungkyunkwan University, Korea, 1995 M.A., Korea University, Korea, 2000 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ATHENS, GEORGIA 2013 © 2013 SUKHOON HONG All Rights Reserved EXPLAINING THE PATTERN OF THE DPRK‟S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD MAJOR STATES: AN ANALYSIS OF DOMESTIC POLICY PRIORITIES OF NORTH KOREA ON FOREIGN POLICY by SUKHOON HONG Major Professor: Han S. Park Committee: Loch K. Johnson Jeffrey D. Berejikian Brock F. Tessman Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 2013 DEDICATION To my parents, Taepyo Hong and Soonan Shin iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like express my sincere thanks to my major professor, Dr. Han S. Park for his tremendous support and affection, and to the rest of my committee, Dr. Lock K. Johnson, Dr. Jeffrey D. Berejikian, and Dr. Brock Tessman, without whose support this dissertation would not have been possible. Also, I would like to give my special thanks to my wife, Hyeda Yi, for her unending patience and understanding. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1. The Puzzle .............................................................................................. 1 2. Research Questions ................................................................................ 4 2 IR THEORIES AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK .......................................... 5 1. Theoretical Framework: Selected Features of Leading Theories ......... 5 2. Human Needs Theory ......................................................................... 11 3 RESEARCH DESIGN ............................................................................................. 17 1. Hypotheses ....................................................................................... 17 2. Methodology .................................................................................... 22 3. Expected Findings and Contributions .............................................. 28 4. Organization of the Dissertation ......................................................... 29 4 DOMESTIC POLICY PRIORITIES OF NORTH KOREA: POLICY GOALS AND STRATEGIC CHOICES ................................................................................. 30 1. The DPRK‟s Decision Making Process ............................................ 30 2. Nominal Goals in Foreign Policy ..................................................... 32 vi Page 3. Salient Manifest Goals and Strategies in the DPRK‟s Foreign Policy ................................................................................... 33 5 NORTH KOREAN POLICY TOWARD THE UNITED STATES ........................... 49 1. Historical and Cultural Contexts of US-DPRK Relations ................ 49 2. The United States‟ Policy toward North Korea ................................ 56 3. North Korea‟s Survival Policy toward the United States .................. 61 4. North Korea‟s Policy Priorities toward the United States ................ 76 6 NORTH KOREAN POLICY TOWARD SOUTH KOREA .................................... 85 1. History and Culture of Inter-Korea Relations ................................... 85 2. South Korea‟s Policy toward North Korea ....................................... 89 3. North Korea‟s Security and Economic Policy toward the ROK ....... 93 4. The DPRK‟s Legitimacy Competition with the ROK .................... 108 7 NORTH KOREAN POLICY TOWARD CHINA ................................................ 122 1. Historical and Cultural Contexts of Sino-DPRK Relations ............ 122 2. China‟s Foreign policy toward Korea ............................................. 126 3. Security and Political relations with Sino-DPRK ........................... 131 4. DPRK‟s Economic Relations with China ...................................... 139 5. North Korea‟s Policy Priority toward China .................................. 142 8 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................... 151 1. Summary of Key Findings .............................................................. 151 2. Suggestions for Future Study .......................................................... 156 REFERENCES ......................................................................................................................... 157 vii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Military expenditure by country, 1988-2011 ............................................................. 62 Table 2: Food Situation in the DPRK ..................................................................................... 67 Table 3: The DPRK‟s Policy behavior toward the US ............................................................ 78 Table 4: Trade with the DPRK by Country, 2005-2011 ........................................................... 80 Table 5: The Selected Word's Frequency for the DPRK' Policy Preference to the US, 2005-2009 .............................................................................................................................. 82 Table 6: DPRK & ROK Military Budget ................................................................................. 95 Table 7: Two Koreas‟ GNI (Gross National Income) and Growth Rate ............................... 102 Table 8: North Korea‟s Trade with South Korea: 1995-2011 ................................................ 104 Table 9: Number of Companies Operating in the KIC and Production Volume, 2005-2012 105 Table 10: South Korea's Assistance to North Korea, 2001-2011 ........................................... 106 Table 11: North Korea‟s Military Provocation ....................................................................... 113 Table 12: The DPRK‟s Policy behavior toward the ROK ..................................................... 115 Table 13: The Selected Word's Frequency for the DPRK' Policy Preference to the ROK, 2007-2009 .............................................................................................................. 118 Table 14: Reported Exports of Small Arms to the DPRK by Country .................................. 136 Table 15: The DPRK‟s Merchandise Trade with China, 1995-2011 ..................................... 146 Table 16: The Selected Word's Frequency for the DPRK' Policy Preference to China, 2005-2009 .............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Perspectives: Purposeful Leadership for Turbulent Times, Part I

    Perspectives: Purposeful Leadership for Turbulent Times, Part I

    Purposeful Leadership for Turbulent Times NOVEMBER 2020 Featuring: Hani Kablawi, Chairman of International at BNY Mellon Admiral James Stavridis, PhD, Operating Executive for the Carlyle Group and the former Supreme Allied Commander at NATO Moderated by Tom Hoare, Deputy Chief Communications Officer, BNY Mellon Tom Hoare: Hey everyone, I’m Tom Hoare. I’m the Deputy Chief Communications Officer here at BNY Mellon, and I want to welcome you back and thank you for joining us for our latest episode of our BNY Mellon Perspectives podcast series, where we bring you the leaders and influencers who are making an impact in our financial world, in our industry and beyond. We’ve got another great episode for you today. This episode we want to share with you is the first of a two-parter. It’s a two-part conversation that took place between Hani Kablawi, the Chairman of International here at BNY Mellon and Admiral James Stavridis, the former Supreme Allied Commander at NATO and a current Operating Executive at the Carlyle Group. He’s an incredible leader, and I think you’re really going to enjoy this conversation. Admiral Stavridis was our guest recently for a special webcast series that our Issuer Services business held for clients where we looked at geopolitical issues and the investment landscape relative to the backdrop of the world that we’re living in, one that is awash with change, almost everywhere we look. This part of the conversation you’ll hear today is one in which Hani and Admiral Stavridis talk about the traits that are key to being successful, not just professionally, not just in your career, but in the many elements of what it means to live a fulfilling life.
  • Shaef-Sgs-Records.Pdf

    Shaef-Sgs-Records.Pdf

    363.6 DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER LIBRARY ABILENE, KANSAS SUPREME HEADQUARTERS, ALLIED EXPEDITIONARY FORCE, OFFICE OF SECRETARY, GENERAL STAFF: Records, 1943-45 [microfilm] Accession 71-14 Processed by: DJH Date completed: June 1991 The microfilm of the records of the Secretary of the General Staff, Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force, was sent to the Eisenhower Library by the Modern Military Records Division of the National Archives in September 1969. Linear feet of shelf space occupied: 4 Number of reels of microfilm: 62 Literary rights in the SHAEF records are in the public domain. These records were processed in accordance with the general restrictions on access to government records as set forth by the National Archives. SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE The Supreme Headquarters, Allied Expeditionary Force (SHAEF) was a joint U.S. - British military organization created in England in February 1944 to carry out the invasion of Western Europe. Dwight D. Eisenhower, an officer of the United States Army, was appointed Supreme Allied Commander. Eisenhower organized his staff along U.S. military lines with separate staff sections devoted to personnel (G-1), intelligence (G-2), operations (G-3), logistics (G-4) and civilian affairs (G-5). The most significant files at SHAEF were kept in the Office of the Secretary of the General Staff (SGS). The SGS office served as a type of central file for SHAEF. The highest-level documents that received the personal attention of the Supreme Allied Commander and the Chief of Staff usually ended up in the SGS files. Many of the staff sections and administrative offices at SHAEF retired material to the SGS files.
  • Theater Missile Defenses in the Asia–Pacific Region

    Theater Missile Defenses in the Asia–Pacific Region

    Theater Missile Defenses in the Asia–Pacific Region A Henry L. Stimson Center Working Group Report Report No. 34 June 2000 Copyright©2000 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 [email protected] www.stimson.org Theater Missile Defenses in the Asia–Pacific Region A Henry L. Stimson Center Working Group Report Kenneth W. Allen James R. East David M. Finkelstein Banning Garrett Bonnie Glaser Michael J. Green Michael Krepon Michael McDevitt Eric A. McVadon Mike M. Mochizuki Ronald N. Montaperto James Mulvenon Benjamin L. Self David Shambaugh Executive Summary embers of the Henry L. Stimson Working Group on Theater Missile Defenses (TMD) all agree Mthat policy options for TMD should not be driven by ideological constructs—whether for or against the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, Taiwan independence, or a containment policy toward China. Nor should TMD choices be driven by technological optimism. Far too often, fixed constructs frame policy choices, whether on missile defenses or on China policy. US foreign policy, alliance ties, regional and US national security are likely to suffer if ideology crowds out regional expertise. This report constitutes the best efforts of the Working Group to apply regional expertise to TMD policy choices. The Working Group’s deliberations have been framed by two overarching considerations: US policy choices toward TMD must be acutely mindful of the pitfalls associated with missile defense deployments, but they must also be responsive to the growing ballistic missile threats in the Asia–Pacific region. Given the many complexities as well as the political and military ramifications of TMD options, policy decisions must be made carefully.
  • Why Is the World So Unsettled?

    Why Is the World So Unsettled?

    www.csbaonline.org 1 Why Is the World So Unsettled? The End of the Post-Cold War Era and the Crisis of Global Order The essence of a revolution is that it appears to contemporaries as a series of more or less unrelated upheavals. The temptation is great to treat each issue as an immediate and isolated problem which once surmounted will permit the fundamental stability of the international order to reassert itself. But the crises which form the headlines of the day are symptoms of deep-seated structural problems. --Henry Kissinger, 19691 During Donald Trump’s presidency and after, both U.S. foreign policy and the international system are likely to be wracked by crises. The instability and violence caused by a militarily resurgent Russia’s aggressive behavior in Ukraine and elsewhere; the growing frictions and threat of conflict with an increasingly assertive China; the provocations of an insecure and progressively more dangerous North Korea; the profound Middle Eastern instability generated by a revolutionary, revisionist Iran as well as by persistent challenges from non-state actors—these and other challenges have tested U.S. officials and the basic stability of international affairs in recent years, and they are likely to do so for the foreseeable future. The world now seems less stable and more perilous than at any time since the Cold War; both the number and severity of today’s global crises are on the rise. Yet as Henry Kissinger wrote nearly a half-century ago, during another time of great upheaval in the international environment, making sense of crises requires doing more than simply viewing them—or seeking to address them—individually, for all are symptomatic of deeper changes in the structure of international relations.
  • Current Affairs in North Korea, 2010-2017: a Collection of Research Notes

    Current Affairs in North Korea, 2010-2017: a Collection of Research Notes

    235 Current Affairs in North Korea, 2010-2017: A Collection of Research Notes Rudiger Frank Abstract Starting with the public introduction of Kim Jong-un to the public in autumn of 2010 and ending with observations of consumerism in February 2017, this collection of 16 short research notes that were originally published at 38North discusses some of the most crucial issues, aside from the nuclear problem, that dominated the field of North Korean Studies in the past decade. Left in their original form, these short articles show the consistency of major North Korean policies as much as the development of our understanding of the new leader and his approach. Topics covered include the question of succession, economic statistics, new ideological trends such as pyŏngjin, techno- logical developments including a review of the North Korean tablet computer Samjiyŏn, the Korean unification issue, special economic zones, foreign trade, parliamentary elections and the first ever Party congress since 1980. Keywords: North Korea, DPRK, 38North Frank, Rudiger. “Current Affairs in North Korea, 2010-2017: A Collection of Research Notes” In Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies, Volume 9, eds. Rudiger Frank, Ina Hein, Lukas Pokorny, and Agnes Schick-Chen. Vienna: Praesens Verlag, 2017, pp. 235–350. https://doi.org/10.2478/vjeas-2017-0008 236 Vienna Journal of East Asian Studies Hu Jintao, Deng Xiaoping or another Mao Zedong? Power Restruc- turing in North Korea Date of original publication: 5 October 2010 URL: http://38north.org/2010/10/1451 “Finally,” one is tempted to say. The years of speculation and half-baked news from dubious sources are over.
  • Ranking Us Army Generals of the Twentieth Century

    Ranking Us Army Generals of the Twentieth Century

    ABSTRACT Title of thesis: RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Todd Philip Retchless, Master of Science 2005 Directed By: Professor Bruce Golden Department of Decision and Informatio n Technologies The group analytic hierarchy process (GAHP) is a mathematically based decision making tool that allows groups of individuals to participate in the decision making process. In this thesis, we use the GAHP and the expert opinions of 10 pro fessional and amateur military historians to rank seven U.S. Army generals of the 20th Century. We use two methods to determine the priority vectors: the traditional eigenvector method and the recently introduced interval linear programming method. We co nsider the effects of removing outlier data and compare the rankings obtained by each method. RANKING U.S. ARMY GENERALS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY USING THE GROUP ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. By Todd Philip Retchless Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science 2005 Advisory Committee: Professor Bruce Golden, Chair Professor Edward Wasil Pr ofessor Charles D. Levermore © Copyright by Todd Philip Retchless 2005 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................... iv List of Figures ..............................................................................................................
  • Once in a Blue Moon: Airmen in Theater Command Lauris Norstad, Albrecht Kesselring, and Their Relevance to the Twenty-First Century Air Force

    Once in a Blue Moon: Airmen in Theater Command Lauris Norstad, Albrecht Kesselring, and Their Relevance to the Twenty-First Century Air Force

    COLLEGE OF AEROSPACE DOCTRINE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION AIR UNIVERSITY AIR Y U SIT NI V ER Once in a Blue Moon: Airmen in Theater Command Lauris Norstad, Albrecht Kesselring, and Their Relevance to the Twenty-First Century Air Force HOWARD D. BELOTE Lieutenant Colonel, USAF CADRE Paper No. 7 Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112-6615 July 2000 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Belote, Howard D., 1963– Once in a blue moon : airmen in theater command : Lauris Norstad, Albrecht Kesselring, and their relevance to the twenty-first century Air Force/Howard D. Belote. p. cm. -- (CADRE paper ; no. 7) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 1-58566-082-5 1. United States. Air Force--Officers. 2. Generals--United States. 3. Unified operations (Military science) 4. Combined operations (Military science) 5. Command of troops. I. Title. II. CADRE paper ; 7. UG793 .B45 2000 358.4'133'0973--dc21 00-055881 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. This CADRE Paper, and others in the series, is available electronically at the Air University Research web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil under “Research Papers” then “Special Collections.” ii CADRE Papers CADRE Papers are occasional publications sponsored by the Airpower Research Institute of Air University’s (AU) College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research and Education (CADRE). Dedicated to promoting understanding of air and space power theory and application, these studies are published by the Air University Press and broadly distributed to the US Air Force, the Department of Defense and other governmental organiza- tions, leading scholars, selected institutions of higher learn- ing, public policy institutes, and the media.
  • Dealing with Allies in Decline Alliance Management and U.S

    Dealing with Allies in Decline Alliance Management and U.S

    DEALING WITH ALLIES IN DECLINE ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT AND U.S. STRATEGY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL POWER SHIFTS HAL BRANDS DEALING WITH ALLIES IN DECLINE ALLIANCE MANAGEMENT AND U.S. STRATEGY IN AN ERA OF GLOBAL POWER SHIFTS HAL BRANDS 2017 ABOUT THE CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS (CSBA) The Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments is an independent, nonpartisan policy research institute established to promote innovative thinking and debate about national security strategy and investment options. CSBA’s analysis focuses on key questions related to existing and emerging threats to U.S. national security, and its goal is to enable policymakers to make informed decisions on matters of strategy, security policy, and resource allocation. ABOUT THE AUTHOR Hal Brands is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments and is also Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). In 2015–2016, he was a Council on Foreign Relations International Affairs Fellow. In that capacity, he served as a special assistant to the Secretary of Defense, working on a range of strategic planning and policy issues. He has also consulted with a range of government offices and agencies in the intelligence and national security communities, as well as the RAND Corporation, and provided research and analysis for the Office of Net Assessment in the Department of Defense. He received his BA from Stanford University (2005) and his Ph.D. from Yale University (2009). He previously worked as an Assistant and Associate Professor at Duke University's Sanford School of Public Policy and as a researcher at the Institute for Defense Analyses.
  • Forging the Weapon: the Origins of SHAPE

    Forging the Weapon: the Origins of SHAPE

    “Forging the weapon” the origins oF shape La genèse du shape An exhibition celebrating Une exposition qui aura lieu à l’occasion the first public disclosure de la première mise en lecture publique of SHAPE historical documents. de documents historiques du SHAPE. Official launch & cocktail reception Ouverture officielle & réception 7 December 2012 at 11.45 7 décembre 2012 à 11h45 NATO HQ Press Hall Hall de presse de l’OTAN 1705-12 NATO Graphics & Printing www.nato.int/archives/SHAPE The short film ALLIANCE FOR PEACE (1953) and rare film footage chronicling the historical events related to the creation of SHAPE Le court-métrage ALLIANCE FOR PEACE (1953) et des séquences rares qui relatent les événements historiques concernant la genèse de SHAPE. Forging the weapon The origins of SHAPE The NATO Archives and the SHAPE Historical Office would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of SHAPE Records and Registry, the NATO AIM Printing and Graphics Design team, the NATO PDD video editors, the Imperial War Museum, and the archives of the National Geographic Society, all of whom contributed invaluable assistance and material for this exhibition. Les Archives de l’OTAN et le Bureau historique du SHAPE tiennent à expriment toute leur reconnaissance aux Archives et au Bureau d’ordre du SHAPE, à l’équipe Impression et travaux graphiques de l’AIM de l’OTAN, aux monteurs vidéo de la PDD de l’OTAN, à l’Imperial War Museum et au service des archives de la National Geographic Society, pour leur précieuse assistance ainsi que pour le matériel mis à disposition aux fins de cette exposition.
  • Download Article PDF , Format And

    Download Article PDF , Format And

    Volume 94 Number 888 Winter 2012 PERSPECTIVES ON THE ICRC Working towards a better world Admiral James G. Stavridis, NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Europe Admiral James G. Stavridis assumed duties as the NATO Supreme Allied Commander, Europe, in early summer 2009. A Surface Warfare Officer, Admiral Stavridis has also served ashore as strategic and long-range planner on the staffs of the Chief of Naval Operations and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and as the Executive Assistant to the Secretary of the Navy and the Senior Military Assistant to the Secretary of Defense. He is a distinguished graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy and holds a PhD and a MALD in International Relations from The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. It is both a privilege and pleasure to be asked to contribute to this special edition of the International Review of the Red Cross. As the Supreme Allied Commander Europe, I oversee all NATO’s global operations and regard good relations between the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the military as essential. In today’s world, with its complex conflicts and insurgencies, many see an inevitable friction between the military and civilian international and non-governmental organizations. Frankly, I do not. The ICRC has always been a steadfast companion to our uniformed men and women in combat. Today the focus of the ICRC’s work is more on behalf of civilians; but at its inception, the Red Cross was created in response to the plight of wounded soldiers. In 1864, the first Geneva Convention laid down obligations on armies to care for the wounded of all sides and created a new and universal standard of acceptable behaviour.
  • What Does North Korea Want from China? Understanding Pyongyang’S Policy Priorities Toward Beijing

    What Does North Korea Want from China? Understanding Pyongyang’S Policy Priorities Toward Beijing

    What Does North Korea Want from China? Understanding Pyongyang’s Policy Priorities toward Beijing Sukhoon Hong What influences the role domestic policy priorities and ideology play in North Korea’s enactment of foreign policy toward China? Historically, both North Korea and China are communist nations that share cultural characteristics. Currently, the Sino-North Korea alliance still seems effective and valid. When looking at China, North Korea does not perceive any struggle with regard to security and regime legitimacy. Thus it is reasonable to assume that Pyongyang’s foreign policy toward China is mostly based on a desire for “economic prosperity.” In order to test this hypothesis, this study employs the “process-tracing” method, and also observes the official newspaper of the regime in Pyongyang through content analysis in order to determine the DPRK’s perception and policy preference toward China. In North Korea’s for- eign policy, the essential ideologies and historical experiences have formed the preferences of the leadership in Pyongyang. The DPRK’s domestic pri- orities greatly influence its foreign policy toward China, more so than exter- nal pressures and direct diplomatic interactions. Key Words: North Korean foreign policy, domestic priority, security, identity, prosperity, China-DPRK relations ot only is the Korean peninsula one of the world’s most militarized areas, N but its future stability has been further clouded by North Korea’s nuclear gambit under young leader Kim Jung-Un and the ensuring political and eco- nomic uncertainties in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea). Through the recent purge of executed Jang Song Thaek, a heavy- weight in the economic relationship between China and North Korea, the Sino- DPRK relationship remains as murky as ever.
  • 1 “The Brookings Institution and Taiwan-China Relations” by Richard C. Bush the Brookings Institution Prepared for the Confe

    1 “The Brookings Institution and Taiwan-China Relations” by Richard C. Bush the Brookings Institution Prepared for the Confe

    “The Brookings Institution and Taiwan-China Relations”1 by Richard C. Bush The Brookings Institution Prepared for the Conference on “Between Power and Knowledge: Think Tanks in Transition” Institute for International Relations, National Chengchi University April 2013 A couple of years ago, I chanced upon an aging copy of the January 1945 issue of National Geographic magazine. To my surprise, there was an article about Taiwan (called “Formosa” in the article). As was common with National Geographic at that time, there were many pictures of the island’s aboriginal peoples (in this case, they were all fully clothed). But there were also pictures of U.S. bomb damage during World War II, and a not-bad description of Taiwan’s history, society, and 20th century circumstances. The author was Joseph Ballantine, who had served in the American Consulate in Taihoku from 1912 to 1914. I had never heard of Ballantine, so I resorted to my default source of information – Wikipedia. Imagine my even greater surprise when I discovered that he had actually been a scholar at Brookings, and that through the Institution’s Press, he had published a book about Taiwan in 1952: Formosa: A Problem for United States Foreign Policy.2 I had no idea that my own organization’s coverage of the Taiwan Strait issue had such a long history. So I was pleased when Arthur Ding invited me to write about how Brookings had treated the subject over the last six decades. I do so in a basically chronological way and draw on the books that a series of Brookings scholars have written that addressed cross-Strait relations to one degree or another.