DOCSLIB.ORG

AMPHIBIANS Baffico Gustavo D. & Ubeda Carmen A. 2006. Larval Diet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AMPHIBIANS Baffico Gustavo D. & Ubeda Carmen A. 2006. Larval Diet AMPHIBIANS Baffico Gustavo D. & Ubeda Carmen A. 2006. Larval diet of the frog Alsodes gargola (Leptodactylidae: Telmat obrinae) and some ecological considerations on its role in alpine and mountain aquatic environments in Patagonia. Amphibia-Reptilia, 27(2): 161-168. Blackburn David C. & Moreau Corie S. 2006. Ontogenetic diet change in the Arthroleptid frog Schoutedenella xenodactyloides. Journal of Herpetology, 40(3): 388-394. Hadfield C.A., Clayton L.A. & Barnet S.L. 2006. Nutritional support of amphibians. Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine, 15(4): 264-268. Hailey Adrian, Sookoo Nicole, Mohammad Azad & Khan Asif. 2006. Factors affecting tadpole growth: development of a rearing system for the neotropical leptodactylid Physalaemus pustulosus for ecotoxicological studies. Applied Herpetology, 3(2): 111-128. Kupfer Alexander, Muller Hendrik, Antoniazzi Marta M., Jared Carlos, Grevan Hartmot, Nussbaum Ronald A. & Wilkinson Mark. 2006. Parental investment by skin feeding in a caecilian amphibian. Nature, 440: 926-929. Miranda Tatiana, Elner Martin, Sole Marco & Kevet Axel. 2006. Spatial, seasonal and intrapopulational variation in the diet of Pseudis cardosoi (Anura: HYLIDAE) from the araucaria plateau of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Herpetology, 1(2): 121-130. BIRDS Aygen Deniz & Enslie, Steven D. 2006. Royal tern (Sterna maxima) chick diet at Fisherman Island National Wildlife Refuge, Virginia. Waterbirds, 29(3): 395-400. Batista de Pinto Joao, Lopes Leonardo Esteves, Honorio de Morais Drausio & Fernandes Alexandre Mendes. 2006. Life history of the Mato Grosse antbird Cercomacra melanaria in the Brazilian Pantanal. Ibis, 148(2): 321-329. Benowitz-Fredericks Z. Morgan, Kitaysky Alexander S. & Thompson Christopher W. 2006. Growth and allocation in captive common murre (Uria aalge) chicks. The Auk, 123(3): 722- 734. Blount Jonathan D., Monaghan Pat, Metcalfe Neil B., Arnold Kathryn E. & Surai Peter F. 2006. Effects of neonatal nutrition on adult reproduction in a passerine bird. Ibis, 148(3): 509-514. Browne Stephen J., Aelischen Nicholas J., Moreby Stephen J. & Teague Luke. 2006. The diet and disease susceptibility of grey partridge Perdix perdix on arable farmland in East Anglia, England. Wildlife Biology, 12(1): 3-10. Carmona Erico R. & Rivadeneira Marcelo M. 2006. Food habits of the barn owl Tyto alba in the national reserve Pampa del Tamarugal, Atacama desert, northern Chile. Journal of Natural History, 40(7): 473-483. Catry Teresa, Ramos Jaime A., Paiva Vitor H., Martins Jorge, Almeida Ana, Palma Jorge, Andrade Pedro J., Peste Filipa, Trigo Sandra & Luis Antonio. 2006. Intercolony and annual differences in the diet and feeding ecology of little tern adults and chicks in Portugal. The Condor, 108(2): 366-376. Cerasale David J. & Guglielmo Christopher G. 2006. Dietary effects on prediction of body mass changes in birds by plasma metabolites. The Auk, 123(3): 836-846. Falk Knud, Jensen Flemming Pagh, Christensen Kim Diget & Svenning Bo. 2006. The diet of nestling Abdim’s stork Ciconia abdimii in Niger. Waterbirds, 29(2): 215-220. Gall Adrian E., Roby Daniel O., Irons David B. & Rose Ian C. 2006. Differential response in chick survival to diet in Least and Crested auklets. Marine Ecology Series, 308: 279-291. Grimm Tomas. 2006. An exceptionally high diversity of hoverflies (Syrphidae) in the food of the reed warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Biologia, 61(2): 235-239. Katzner Todd E., Bragin Evgeny A., Knick Steven T. & Smith T. 2006. Spatial structure in the diet of imperial eagles Aquila heliaca in Kazakhstan. Journal of Avian Biology, 37(6): 594- 600. Kopij Grzegprz. 2006. Diet of the black-headed heron Ardea melanocephala during the breeding season in South African grasslands. Bioogia, 61(2): 241-244. Mace M., Ranger W., Lewis E., Atallian D.M. & Farly M. 2006. Breeding and hand-rearing Storm’s storks Ciconia stormi at the Zoological Society of San Diego. International Zoo Yearbook, 40(1): 254-260. McGraw Kevin J. & Klasing Kirk C. 2006. Carotenoids, immunity and integumentary coloration in red junglefowl (Gallus gallus). The Auk, 123(4): 1161-1171. Merkel Flemming, Jamieson Sarah, Falk Knud & Mosbech Anders. 2007. The diet of common eiders wintering in Nuuk, southwest Greenland. Polar Biology, 30(2): 227-234. Munshi-South Jason & Wilkinson Gerald S. 2006. Diet influences life span in parrots (Psittaciformes). The Auk, 123(1): 108-118. Naves Liliana Coelho & Vooren Carolos Maria. 2006. Diet of black skimmers in southern Brazil. Waterbirds, 29(3): 335-344. Ndithia Henry & Perrin Michael R. 2006. Diet and foraging behavior of the rosy-faced lovebird Agapornis roseicollis in Namibia. Ostrich, 77(1-2): 45-51. Olsen Geoffrey P., Russell Karen E., Dierenfeld Ellen, Falcon Michelle D. & Phalen David N. 2006. Impact of supplements on iron absorption from diets containing high and low iron concentrations in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 20(2): 67-73. Olsen Geoffrey P., Russell Karen E., Dierenfeld Ellen & Phalen David N. 2006. A comparison of four regimens for treatment of iron storage disease using the European starling (Sturnis vulgaris) as a model. Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery, 20(2): 74-79. Pechacek Peter. 2006. Foraging behavior of Eurasian three-toed woodpeckers (Picoides tridactylus alpinus) in relation to sex and season in Germany. The Auk, 123(1): 235-246. Phillips Richard A. 2006. Efficiency and effects of diet sampling of albatross chicks. Emu, 106(4): 305-308. Raley Catherine M. & Aubry Keith B. 2006. Foraging ecology of pileated woodpeckers in coastal forests of Washington. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70(5): 1266-1275. Renton Katherine. 2006. Diet of adult and nestling scarlet macaws in southwest Belize, Central America. Biotropica, 38(2): 280-283. Romano Marc. D., Piatt John F. & Roby Daniel D. 2006. Testing the junk food hypothesis in marine birds: effects of prey type on growth and development. Waterbirds, 29(4): 407-414. Seifelt Nancy E. & Gillingham James C. 2006. A comparison of three methods to investigate the diet of breeding double-crested cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) in the Beaver Archipelago, northern Lake Michigan. Hydrobiologia, 567(1): 57-67. Smith Susan B., McWilliams Scott R. & Gugliemo Christopher G. 2007. Effect of diet composition on plasma metabolite profiles in a migratory songbird. The Condor, 109(1): 48-58. Soave Guillermo E., Camperi Anibal R., Darrieve Carlos E., Cicchino Armando C., Ferretti Vanina & Jurarez Marcos. 2006. White-faced ibis diet in Arentina. Waterbirds, 29(2): 191- 197. Taylor Stuart & Perrin Michael R. 2006. The diet of brown-headed parrots (Poicephalus cryptoxanthus) in the wild in southern Africa. Ostrich: Journal of African Ornithology , 77(2): 179-185. Veng Yih-Tsong, Perng Jen-Jiun, Wang Jiang Ping, Wang Jug-Hsuan & Hou Ping-Chun Lucy. 2006. Diet of the black-faced spoonbill wintering at Chiku wetland in southwestern Taiwan. Waterbirds, 29(2): 185-190. Votier Stephen C., Bearhop Stuart, Crane Jonathan E., Arcos Jose Manuel & Furness Robert W. 2007. Seabird predation by great skuas Stercorarius skua: intra-specific competition for food? Journal of Avian Biology, 38(2): 234-246. Wienecke Barbara & Robertson Graham. 2006. Comparison of foraging strategies of incubating King penguins Aptenodytes patagonicus from Macquarrie and Heard Islands. Polar Biology, 29(5): 424-438. FEEDS, FORAGES and METHODOLOGY Aloma, D., Hodgkinson S., Abarzua D., Fuchslocher R., Alvarado, C. & Rosales E. 2006. Nutritional evaluation of commercial dog foods by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 90(5-6): 223-229. Cerasale David J. & Guglielmo Christopher G. 2006. Dietary effects on prediction of body mass changes in birds by plasma metabolites. The Auk, 123(3): 836-846. Figueroa Ricardo A.R., Corales Soraya E.S., Martinez David R.P., Figueroa Rodolfo M. & Gonzalez-Acuna. 2006. Diet of the rufous-legged owl (Strix rufipes; Strigiformes) in an Andean Nothofagus-Araucaria forest, Southern Chile. Studies in Neotropical Fauna and Environment, 41(3): 179-182. Kaneko Hitomi & Lawler Ivan Robert. 2006. Can near infrared spectroscopy be used to improve assessment of marine mammal diets via fecal analysis? Marine Mammal Science, 22(2): 261-275. Olson Valerie A. 2006. Estimating nutrient intake in comparative studies of animals: an example using dietary carotenoid content in birds. Oikos, 112(3): 620-628. Rombola Emilce, Marschoff Enrique & Coria Nestor. 2006. Interannual study of chinstrap penguin’s diet and reproductive success at Laurie Island, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 29(6): 502- 509. Rubanza Chrispinus DK., Shem Slima S., Ichinohe Toshigoshi & Fujihara Tsutomo. 2007. The content of protein, fiber and minerals of leaves of selected Acacia species indigenous to northwestern Tanzania. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 61(2): 151-156. Selley, P. Feed additives: do bacteria need to be regulated? Journal of Applied Microbiology, 101(3): 607-615. Starks P.J., Zhao D., Phillips W.A. & Coleman S.W. Herbage mass, nutritive value and canopy spectral reflectance of Bermuda grass pastures. Grass and Forage Science, 61(2): 101-111. Sijak Agnieszka, Kotlarz Anna & Strobel Waclaw. 2006. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds. Food Chemistry, 98(4): 711-719. FISH (Aquaria) Ajah P.O., Georgewill M.N. & Ajah M.O. 2006. The food and feeding habits of five freshwater and brackish-water fish species in Nigeria. African Journal of Aquatic Science, 31(2): 313-318. Baeta Alexander,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Grado De Protección De Los Anfibios Patagónicos De Argentina
    DiciembreEcología Austral de 2007 17:269-279. Diciembre PROTECCIÓN 2007 DE ANFIBIOS PATAGÓNICOS 269 Asociación Argentina de Ecología El grado de protección de los anfibios patagónicos de Argentina * CARMEN ÚBEDA & DORA GRIGERA Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Bariloche, Río Negro, Argentina. RESUMEN. En este trabajo se evalúa si las áreas protegidas de la Patagonia brindan una protección adecuada a los anfibios de esta región. Se analizó la distribución y la categoría de conservación de 31 taxa de anuros en función de la ubicación de las áreas protegidas, particularmente del sistema nacional. Seis taxa no se registraron en unidad de protección alguna, siendo la mayoría de ellos típicos de estepa. Todos los anfibios de bosque se encuentran al menos en un área protegida. Cinco de los taxa que se consideran amenazados, y uno insuficientemente conocido, no están comprendidos en ninguna unidad de protección. Otros anfibios amenazados, incluyendo microendemismos y un género monotípico, están en áreas que por falta de implementación o control no garantizan su conservación. La contigüidad entre varios Parques Nacionales argentinos y chilenos a lo largo de los Andes patagónicos contribuye a la protección de los anfibios de bosque, mientras que esta situación favorece a una sola de las especies esteparias. Se concluye que las razones históricas que influyeron en la ubicación de las áreas protegidas, afectaron positivamente a la batracofauna de los bosques, quedando fuera de las áreas nacionales la mayoría de los taxa endémicos de estepa, cuya protección en áreas no pertenecientes al sistema nacional es deficiente o nula. [Palabras clave: anuros, conservación, áreas protegidas, declinación de anfibios, amenazas a la biodiversidad, Patagonia] ABSTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Amphibians of Argentina: an Update and Evaluation of National Assessments
    Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 11(1) [General Section]: 36–44 (e135). Conservation status of Amphibians of Argentina: An update and evaluation of national assessments 1,3Marcos Vaira, 1Laura C. Pereyra, 1Mauricio S. Akmentins, and 2Jon Bielby 1Instituto de Ecorregiones Andinas (INECOA), CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Av. Bolivia 1711 (4600), San Salvador de Jujuy, ARGENTINA 2Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UNITED KINGDOM Abstract.—We present a review on the conservation status of the 177 species and subspecies of amphibians of Argentina and compare the first national assessment, conducted in 2000, with the most recent one, from 2012, to determine changes in conservation status over time. We also evaluate the degree of taxonomic and geographic non-randomness in extinction risk among these taxa. The present study shows an improvement in the knowledge of amphibian diversity in Argentina, but also increasing evidence of population declines and species absences. Twenty-two species showed a genuine increase in threat status between national assessments, and habitat loss and/or degradation, chytrid fungus infection, and introduction of invasive species have been reported as the main threats. Randomization tests showed families Telmatobiidae and Batrachylidae to be over-threatened and Hylidae and Leptodactylidae to be significantly under-threatened. Also, four ecoregions were shown to be significantly over-threatened (Patagonian Steepe, Patagonian Woodlands, Puna, and Yungas Forests). This evaluation help to identify groups of species that face similar suites and intensities of threat as a result of their overlapping geographical distributions and shared biological susceptibility as a result of their evolutionary history.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Ecology and Conservation of Frogs in Urban Habitats of South Africa
    Frogs about town: Aspects of the ecology and conservation of frogs in urban habitats of South Africa DJD Kruger 20428405 Thesis submitted for the degree Philosophiae Doctor in Zoology at the Potchefstroom Campus of the North-West University Supervisor: Prof LH du Preez Co-supervisor: Prof C Weldon September 2014 i In loving memory of my grandmother, Kitty Lombaard (1934/07/09 – 2012/05/18), who has made an invaluable difference in all aspects of my life. ii Acknowledgements A project with a time scale and magnitude this large leaves one indebted by numerous people that contributed to the end result of this study. I would like to thank the following people for their invaluable contributions over the past three years, in no particular order: To my supervisor, Prof. Louis du Preez I am indebted, not only for the help, guidance and support he has provided throughout this study, but also for his mentorship and example he set in all aspects of life. I also appreciate the help of my co-supervisor, Prof. Ché Weldon, for the numerous contributions, constructive comments and hours spent on proofreading. I owe thanks to all contributors for proofreading and language editing and thereby correcting my “boerseun” English grammar but also providing me with professional guidance. Prof. Louis du Preez, Prof. Ché Weldon, Dr. Andrew Hamer, Dr. Kirsten Parris, Prof. John Malone and Dr. Jeanne Tarrant are all dearly thanked for invaluable comments on earlier drafts of parts/the entirety of this thesis. For statistical contributions I am especially also grateful to Dr. Andrew Hamer for help with Bayesian analysis and to the North-West Statistical Services consultant, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property
    Appendix 1: Maps and Plans Appendix184 Map 1: Conservation Categories for the Nominated Property. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 185 Map 2: Andean-North Patagonian Biosphere Reserve: Context for the Nominated Proprty. Los Alerces National Park, Argentina 186 Map 3: Vegetation of the Valdivian Ecoregion 187 Map 4: Vegetation Communities in Los Alerces National Park 188 Map 5: Strict Nature and Wildlife Reserve 189 Map 6: Usage Zoning, Los Alerces National Park 190 Map 7: Human Settlements and Infrastructure 191 Appendix 2: Species Lists Ap9n192 Appendix 2.1 List of Plant Species Recorded at PNLA 193 Appendix 2.2: List of Animal Species: Mammals 212 Appendix 2.3: List of Animal Species: Birds 214 Appendix 2.4: List of Animal Species: Reptiles 219 Appendix 2.5: List of Animal Species: Amphibians 220 Appendix 2.6: List of Animal Species: Fish 221 Appendix 2.7: List of Animal Species and Threat Status 222 Appendix 3: Law No. 19,292 Append228 Appendix 4: PNLA Management Plan Approval and Contents Appendi242 Appendix 5: Participative Process for Writing the Nomination Form Appendi252 Synthesis 252 Management Plan UpdateWorkshop 253 Annex A: Interview Guide 256 Annex B: Meetings and Interviews Held 257 Annex C: Self-Administered Survey 261 Annex D: ExternalWorkshop Participants 262 Annex E: Promotional Leaflet 264 Annex F: Interview Results Summary 267 Annex G: Survey Results Summary 272 Annex H: Esquel Declaration of Interest 274 Annex I: Trevelin Declaration of Interest 276 Annex J: Chubut Tourism Secretariat Declaration of Interest 278
    [Show full text]
  • Beaver Facilitation in the Conservation of Boreal Anuran Communities (Anura: Bufonidae, Ranidae)
    vehkaoja_nummi_beaves__Anuran_conservation_HerPetozoA.qxd 28.07.2015 15:07 Seite 1 HerPetozoA 28 (1/2): 75 - 87 75 Wien, 30. Juli 2015 beaver facilitation in the conservation of boreal anuran communities (Anura: bufonidae, ranidae) Die Förderung des bibers und die erhaltung der borealen Anurengemeinschaften (Anura: bufonidae, ranidae) miA veHkAoJA & P etri nummi kurzFASSunG Artensterben und Habitatverlust verlaufen in europa und weltweit rasant. Amphibien und Feuchtlebens - räume sind ganz wesentlich davon betroffen. letztere warden in der borealen zone häufig durch die Dammbau- tätigkeit des bibers ( Castor sp.) bereitgestellt. Die Autoren untersuchten die Anurenfauna in zehn derartigen biber-Gewässern, zehn nicht vom biber bewohnten und acht temporären Wasserkörpern in Finland. Alle drei in der region heimischen Anurenarten (erdkröte, moor- und Grasfrosch) besiedelten die biber-Gewässer, wobei der moorfrosch in nicht vom biber bewohnten und temporären Gewässern des Gebietes nicht gefunden wurde. moorfrösche profitierten offensichtlich vom teichbaua und dem Fällen von bäumen durch den biber und die damit verbundene Schaffung einer vielzahl von seichten Gewässerabschnitten mit breiten emersen vegetationsgürteln. Die ergebnisse zeigen, daß biber qualitative hochwertige Anurenhabitate schaffen und das vorkommen des moorfrosches begünstigen.. es wird angeregt, biber als ingenieure bei der Wiederherstellung von Ökosystemen einzusetzen, um die ziele des Amphibienschutzes zu unterstützen. AbStrACt A rapid loss of species and habitats is occurring globally. Amphibians and wetlands are important compo - nents of this overall decline. Wetlands in the boreal region are frequently constructed by damming activities of an ecosystem engineer, the beaver ( Castor sp.). the authors investigated the anuran fauna in ten such ‘beaver ponds’, ten ‘non-beaver ponds’ and eight temporary ponds in Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography and Scientific Name Index to Amphibians
    lb BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SCIENTIFIC NAME INDEX TO AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON BULLETIN 1-8, 1918-1988 AND PROCEEDINGS 1-100, 1882-1987 fi pp ERNEST A. LINER Houma, Louisiana SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 92 1992 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. INTRODUCTION The present alphabetical listing by author (s) covers all papers bearing on herpetology that have appeared in Volume 1-100, 1882-1987, of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington and the four numbers of the Bulletin series concerning reference to amphibians and reptiles. From Volume 1 through 82 (in part) , the articles were issued as separates with only the volume number, page numbers and year printed on each. Articles in Volume 82 (in part) through 89 were issued with volume number, article number, page numbers and year.
    [Show full text]
  • Reassessment of the Taxonomic Status Of
    European Journal of Taxonomy 679: 1–36 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.679 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Andrade F.S. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF5B7C1B-E51C-4147-ABF1-4B17A54C8067 Reassessment of the taxonomic status of Pseudopaludicola parnaiba (Anura, Leptodactylidae, Leiuperinae), with the description of a new cryptic species from the Brazilian Cerrado Felipe Silva de ANDRADE 1,*, Isabelle Aquemi HAGA 2, Mariana Lúcio LYRA 3, Thiago Ribeiro de CARVALHO 4, Célio Fernando Baptista HADDAD 5, Ariovaldo Antonio GIARETTA 6 & Luís Felipe TOLEDO 7 1,7 Laboratório de História Natural de Anfíbios Brasileiros (LaHNAB), Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 1,2,6 Laboratório de Taxonomia e Sistemática de Anuros Neotropicais (LTSAN), Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais do Pontal (ICENP), Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU), Ituiutaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil. 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. 3,4,5 Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Biodiversidade e Centro de Aquicultura (CAUNESP), Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 3 Email: [email protected] 4 Email: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Categorización Del Estado De Conservación De Los Anfibios De La República Argentina
    Cuad. herpetol. 26 (Supl. 1): 131-159 (2012) Categorización del estado de conservación de los anfibios de la República Argentina Marcos Vaira1, Mauricio Akmentins1, Maximiliano Attademo2, Diego Baldo3, Diego Barrasso4, Sebastián Barrionuevo5, Néstor Basso4, Boris Blotto5, Samanta Cairo6, Rodrigo Cajade7, Jorge Céspedez8, Valeria Corbalán9, Paula Chilote10, Marta Duré7, Camila Falcione8, Daiana Ferraro5, F. Romina Gutierrez10, Maria del Rosario Ingaramo8, Celina Junges2, Rafael Lajmanovich2, Julián N. Lescano11, Federico Marangoni3, Liza Martinazzo4, Romina Marti10, Liliana Moreno10, Guillermo Sebastián Natale12, Juan Manuel Pérez Iglesias10, Paola Peltzer2, Lorena Quiroga13, Sergio Rosset14, Eduardo Sanabria13,15, Laura Sanchez2, Eduardo Schaefer7, Carmen Úbeda16, Víctor Zaracho8 1 CONICET - Centro de Investigaciones Básicas y Aplicadas (CIBA), Universidad Nacional de Jujuy, Gorriti 237 (4600), S. S. Jujuy, Argentina - Instituto de Bio y GeoCiencias del NOA (IBIGEO) Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Uni- versidad Nacional de Salta. Mendoza 2 (4400), Salta, Argentina. 2 Facultad de Bioquímica y Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral. (3000), Santa Fé, Argentina. 3 Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical, FCEQyN, CONICET-UNaM, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina. 4 Centro Nacional Patagónico (CENPAT-CONICET). Blvd. Brown 2915 (1900), Puerto Madryn, Argentina. 5 Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” Av. Angel Gallardo 470 (1405), Buenos Aires, Argentina. 6 GEKKO - Grupo de Estudios en Conservación y Manejo, Universidad Nacional del Sur. San Juan 670 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina. 7 Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CONICET, UNNE), Ruta 5, km 2.5 (3400), Corrientes, Argentina. 8 Laboratorio de Herpetología. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales y Agrimensura. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Av. Libertad 5470 (3400), Corrientes, Argentina. 9 Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas - IADIZA - CCT - Mendoza - CONICET.
    [Show full text]
  • Anfibios De Chile, Un Desafío Para La Conservación Anfibios De Chile, Un Desafío Para La Conservación
    Anfibios de Chile, un desafío para la conservación Anfibios de Chile, un desafío para la conservación. Gabriel Lobos, Marcela Vidal, Claudio Correa, Antonieta Labra, Helen Díaz-Páez, Andrés Charrier, Felipe Rabanal, Sandra Díaz & Charif Tala Datos del libro Edición noviembre 2013 ISBN 978-956-7204-46-5 Tiraje 2000 ejemplares Diseño y diagramación Francisca Villalón O, Ministerio del Medio Ambiente Cita sugerida LOBOS G, VIDAL M, CORREA C, LABRA A, DÍAZ - PÁEZ H, CHARRIER A, RABANAL F, DÍAZ S & TALA C (2013) Anfibios de Chile, un desafío para la conservación. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente, Fundación Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias de la Universidad de Chile y Red Chilena de Herpetología. Santiago. 104 p. Permitida la reproducción de los textos y esquemas para fines no comerciales, citando la fuente de origen. Prohibida la reproducción de las fotos sin permiso de su autor. Impresión Gráfhika Impresores Foto de la portada Sapo de Bullock (Telmatobufo bullocki), foto de Andrés Charrier Anfibios de Chile, un desafío para la conservación Gabriel Lobos, Marcela Vidal, Claudio Correa, Antonieta Labra, Helen Díaz-Páez, Andrés Charrier, Felipe Rabanal, Sandra Díaz & Charif Tala Ministerio del Medio Ambiente Fundación Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias de la Universidad de Chile Red Chilena de Herpetología I. II. Los anfibios, Estado de patrimonio natural y conservación de cultural de nuestro los anfibios país 8 28 III. Prólogo 7 Las causas de la declinación de los 40 anfibios Índice 88 VI. IV. Reseña de algunas 60 Conocimiento de los especies 72 anfibios en Chile: un aporte para su V. conservación Actuando para la conservación de los anfibios onocer a los anfibios implica introducirse convierte en responsables de su conservación a Prólogo en un mundo sorprendente, no sólo por su nivel mundial.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Review of the Frog Family Hylidae, with Special Reference to Hylinae: Phylogenetic Analysis and Taxonomic Revision
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE FROG FAMILY HYLIDAE, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO HYLINAE: PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS AND TAXONOMIC REVISION JULIAÂ N FAIVOVICH Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology (E3B) Columbia University, New York, NY ([email protected]) CEÂ LIO F.B. HADDAD Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiocieÃncias, Unversidade Estadual Paulista, C.P. 199 13506-900 Rio Claro, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) PAULO C.A. GARCIA Universidade de Mogi das Cruzes, AÂ rea de CieÃncias da SauÂde Curso de Biologia, Rua CaÃndido Xavier de Almeida e Souza 200 08780-911 Mogi das Cruzes, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil and Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de SaÄo Paulo, SaÄo Paulo, Brazil ([email protected]) DARREL R. FROST Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Herpetology), American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) JONATHAN A. CAMPBELL Department of Biology, The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington, Texas 76019 ([email protected]) WARD C. WHEELER Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History ([email protected]) BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10024 Number 294, 240 pp., 16 ®gures, 2 tables, 5 appendices Issued June 24, 2005 Copyright q American Museum of Natural History 2005 ISSN 0003-0090 CONTENTS Abstract ....................................................................... 6 Resumo .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Tadpole of Alsodes Cf. Norae (Anura: Alsodidae) with Comments on the Diagnosis of the Genus Alsodes
    SALAMANDRA 53(1) 131–136 15 February 2017CorrespondenceISSN 0036–3375 Correspondence The tadpole of Alsodes cf. norae (Anura: Alsodidae) with comments on the diagnosis of the genus Alsodes J. Ramon Formas & César C. Cuevas Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Box 567 Valdivia, Chile. Corresponding author: J. Ramon Formas , e-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received: 19 December 2014 Accepted: 12 May 2015 by Arne Schulze The Cordillera de Mahuidanche (about 55 km long and ies (A. norae is the only known species of the genus to have 20 km wide, maximum altitude 715 m a.s.l.) is a small seg- 30 chromosomes, Cuevas 2008) and sequences of DNA ment of the Chilean Coastal Range situated between the fragments. Specific identification via DNA barcoding was mouths of the rivers Queule (39°01’ S, 73°06’ W, Cautín impossible, because the tadpoles were fixed in formalin province) and Valdivia (39°52’ S, 73°23’ W, Valdivia prov- (10%) right after capture and PCR was unsuccessful after ince), southern Chile (Fig. 1). In the recent past, the larg- six months in fixing solution. The presence of A. cf. norae est portion of this mountain range used to be covered tadpoles in this restricted area, the inability to capture lar- by temperate Nothofagus forests (Drymis winteri, Laure­ vae again (we explored the streams in the closer vicinity of lia phyllipiana, Weinmannia trichosperma, Dendroligo­ Llenehue bimonthly during 2013 and 2014), and the extent trichum dendro ides, and Cladonia spp.). However, today, of human intervention exerted on the stream and its sur- their western slopes exhibit a high degree of human inter- roundings are arguments adequate to justify the descrip- vention (Pinus and Eucalyptus plantations, cattle pastures, tion of this tadpole.
    [Show full text]
  • 1704632114.Full.Pdf
    Phylogenomics reveals rapid, simultaneous PNAS PLUS diversification of three major clades of Gondwanan frogs at the Cretaceous–Paleogene boundary Yan-Jie Fenga, David C. Blackburnb, Dan Lianga, David M. Hillisc, David B. Waked,1, David C. Cannatellac,1, and Peng Zhanga,1 aState Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, College of Ecology and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; bDepartment of Natural History, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611; cDepartment of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Collections, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712; and dMuseum of Vertebrate Zoology and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by David B. Wake, June 2, 2017 (sent for review March 22, 2017; reviewed by S. Blair Hedges and Jonathan B. Losos) Frogs (Anura) are one of the most diverse groups of vertebrates The poor resolution for many nodes in anuran phylogeny is and comprise nearly 90% of living amphibian species. Their world- likely a result of the small number of molecular markers tra- wide distribution and diverse biology make them well-suited for ditionally used for these analyses. Previous large-scale studies assessing fundamental questions in evolution, ecology, and conser- used 6 genes (∼4,700 nt) (4), 5 genes (∼3,800 nt) (5), 12 genes vation. However, despite their scientific importance, the evolutionary (6) with ∼12,000 nt of GenBank data (but with ∼80% missing history and tempo of frog diversification remain poorly understood. data), and whole mitochondrial genomes (∼11,000 nt) (7). In By using a molecular dataset of unprecedented size, including 88-kb the larger datasets (e.g., ref.
    [Show full text]