DOCSLIB.ORG

First Air Flight 6560 Struck a Hill About 1 Nautical Mile East of the Runway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Air Flight 6560 Struck a Hill About 1 Nautical Mile East of the Runway AVIATION INVESTIGATION REPORT A11H0002 CONTROLLED FLIGHT INTO TERRAIN BRADLEY AIR SERVICES LIMITED (FIRST AIR) BOEING 737-210C, C-GNWN RESOLUTE BAY, NUNAVUT 20 AUGUST 2011 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. Aviation Investigation Report A11H0002 Controlled flight into terrain Bradley Air Services Limited (First Air) Boeing 737-210C, C-GNWN Resolute Bay, Nunavut 20 August 2011 Summary On 20 August 2011, the Boeing 737-210C combi aircraft (registration C-GNWN, serial number 21067), operated by Bradley Air Services Limited under its business name First Air, was being flown as First Air charter flight 6560 from Yellowknife, Northwest Territories, to Resolute Bay, Nunavut. At 1642 Coordinated Universal Time (1142 Central Daylight Time), during the approach to Runway 35T, First Air flight 6560 struck a hill about 1 nautical mile east of the runway. The aircraft was destroyed by impact forces and an ensuing post-crash fire. Eight passengers and all 4 crew members sustained fatal injuries. The remaining 3 passengers sustained serious injuries and were rescued by Canadian military personnel, who were in Resolute Bay as part of a military exercise. The accident occurred during daylight hours. No emergency locator transmitter signal was emitted by the aircraft. Ce rapport est également disponible en français. Table of contents 1.0 Factual information ................................................................................... 1 1.1 History of the flight .............................................................................................................1 1.2 Injuries to persons ................................................................................................................6 1.3 Damage to aircraft ...............................................................................................................6 1.4 Other damage .......................................................................................................................6 1.5 Personnel information .........................................................................................................7 1.5.1 Flight crew ............................................................................................................................................. 7 1.5.2 Flight attendants ................................................................................................................................... 8 1.5.3 CYRB air traffic controllers .................................................................................................................. 8 1.6 Aircraft information ............................................................................................................9 1.6.1 Aircraft maintenance ............................................................................................................................ 9 1.6.2 Aircraft performance .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.6.3 Terrain awareness devices ................................................................................................................. 11 1.6.4 C-GNWN navigation systems ........................................................................................................... 12 1.6.5 C-GNWN compass systems .............................................................................................................. 13 1.6.6 Autopilot system ................................................................................................................................. 15 1.6.7 FD-108 flight director system ............................................................................................................ 17 1.6.8 Attitude director indicator ................................................................................................................. 18 1.6.9 Approach progress display annunciators ........................................................................................ 19 1.6.10 Global positioning system ................................................................................................................. 19 1.6.11 Emergency locator transmitter .......................................................................................................... 20 1.7 Meteorological information ..............................................................................................21 1.7.1 Cloud ceiling height ........................................................................................................................... 21 1.7.2 Yellowknife weather at departure .................................................................................................... 21 1.7.3 Resolute Bay weather issued before departure ............................................................................... 21 1.7.4 Resolute Bay weather issued while FAB6560 was en route .......................................................... 22 1.7.5 Resolute Bay weather issued after the accident .............................................................................. 22 1.7.6 Upper winds ........................................................................................................................................ 23 1.7.7 Weather received by the crew ........................................................................................................... 23 1.8 Aids to navigation..............................................................................................................23 1.8.1 Navigational aids ................................................................................................................................ 23 1.8.2 Possible interference with Resolute Bay instrument landing system functionality .................. 24 1.9 Communications ................................................................................................................24 1.9.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 24 1.9.2 Arrival and approach of KBA909 ..................................................................................................... 24 1.9.3 Communication search for FAB6560 ................................................................................................ 25 1.10 Aerodrome information ....................................................................................................26 1.10.1 Resolute Bay airport ........................................................................................................................... 26 1.10.2 Operation NANOOK additional resources ..................................................................................... 27 1.10.3 Community aerodrome radio stations ............................................................................................. 27 1.11 Flight recorders ..................................................................................................................28 1.11.1 General ................................................................................................................................................. 28 1.11.2 Flight data recorder ............................................................................................................................ 28 1.11.3 Cockpit voice recorder ....................................................................................................................... 31 1.12 Wreckage and impact information ..................................................................................32 1.12.1 Impact ................................................................................................................................................... 32 1.12.2 Wreckage .............................................................................................................................................. 33 1.13 Medical and pathological information ...........................................................................35 1.14 Fire........................................................................................................................................35 1.15 Survival aspects ..................................................................................................................36 1.15.1 Rescue response .................................................................................................................................. 36 1.15.2 Emergency locator transmitter .......................................................................................................... 36 1.15.3 Aircraft occupant seats / structural damage .................................................................................. 37 1.16 Tests and research ..............................................................................................................38 1.17 Organizational and management information ..............................................................38 1.17.1 First Air................................................................................................................................................. 38 1.17.2 Adaptations of standard operating procedures .............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pitot-Static System Blockage Effects on Airspeed Indicator
    The Dramatic Effects of Pitot-Static System Blockages and Failures by Luiz Roberto Monteiro de Oliveira . Table of Contents I ‐ Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….1 II ‐ Pitot‐Static Instruments…………………………………………………………………………………………..3 III ‐ Blockage Scenarios – Description……………………………..…………………………………….…..…11 IV ‐ Examples of the Blockage Scenarios…………………..……………………………………………….…15 V ‐ Disclaimer………………………………………………………………………………………………………………50 VI ‐ References…………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……..……51 Please also review and understand the disclaimer found at the end of the article before applying the information contained herein. I - Introduction This article takes a comprehensive look into Pitot-static system blockages and failures. These typically affect the airspeed indicator (ASI), vertical speed indicator (VSI) and altimeter. They can also affect the autopilot auto-throttle and other equipment that relies on airspeed and altitude information. There have been several commercial flights, more recently Air France's flight 447, whose crash could have been due, in part, to Pitot-static system issues and pilot reaction. It is plausible that the pilot at the controls could have become confused with the erroneous instrument readings of the airspeed and have unknowingly flown the aircraft out of control resulting in the crash. The goal of this article is to help remove or reduce, through knowledge, the likelihood of at least this one link in the chain of problems that can lead to accidents. Table 1 below is provided to summarize
    [Show full text]
  • JTFN Area of Responsibility
    Joint Task Force (North) Force opérationnelle interarmées (Nord) Joint Task Force North Op Nanook: Meeting Northern Challenges with Regional Collaboration LCol Steve Burke Director of Operations Joint Task Force North Yellowknife, NT Joint Task Force (North) Force opérationnelle interarmées (Nord) JTFN Area of Responsibility 40% of Canada’s landmass 75% of Canada’s coastline 72 Communities = .3% of Canada’s population 2 Joint Task Force (North) Force opérationnelle interarmées (Nord) CAF Roles in the North Demonstrate Support Exercise Contribute to Visible and Northern Surveillance Whole of Persistent Peoples and and Control Government Presence Communities Cooperation 3 Joint Task Force (North) Force opérationnelle interarmées (Nord) Joint Task Force (North) Vision Mission Statement The Arctic, integral to Canada and JTFN will enable the Canadian an approach to North America, Armed Forces mandate through necessitates defence across all operations in our Area of domains enabled by partnerships. Responsibility and, in collaboration with partners, will support security JTFN will provide an effective & safety in achieving government operational HQ to leverage these priorities in the Arctic. partnerships ISO CJOC, to: • plan; • command and control; and • support and execute operations and training throughout the North. 4 Joint Task Force (North) Force opérationnelle interarmées (Nord) CAF Presence in Canada’s North • CAF, including through NORAD, operates from a number of locations in the North. • Permanent presence includes JTFN, 1 CRPG, 440
    [Show full text]
  • Air Canada Direct Flight to Sydney Australia
    Air Canada Direct Flight To Sydney Australia Depressive and boneheaded Gabriel junk her refiners arsine boos and jolt surgically. Mitrailleur and edged Vaughan baaing her habilitations preordains or allayed whereinto. Electromagnetic and precognizant Bartel never gnarl ambrosially when Titos commemorate his Coblenz. Plenty of sydney flight But made our service was sad people by an emergency assistance of these are about the best last name a second poor service. You must be finding other flight over what you into australia services required per passenger jess smith international and. You fly to sydney to follow along with. Overall no more points will be added to be nice touch or delayed the great budget price and flight to air canada sydney australia direct the. If you need travel to canada cancelled due to vancouver to? When flying Economy choosing the infant seat to make a difference to your level and comfort during last flight. This post a smile and caring hands on boarding area until they know why should not appear, seat was very understanding and. Also I would appreciate coffee or some drink while waiting. This district what eye need. Korean Air is by far second best airlines I have flown with. Department of Home Affairs in writing. Click should help icon above to shift more. Hawaii or the United Kingdom. Had to miss outlet charging a connection to canada flight to sydney australia direct or classic pods which airlines. Im shocked not reading it anywhere online, anyone know about the route? Price Forecast tool help me choose the right time to buy? Where food and.
    [Show full text]
  • Airline Schedules
    Airline Schedules This finding aid was produced using ArchivesSpace on January 08, 2019. English (eng) Describing Archives: A Content Standard Special Collections and Archives Division, History of Aviation Archives. 3020 Waterview Pkwy SP2 Suite 11.206 Richardson, Texas 75080 [email protected]. URL: https://www.utdallas.edu/library/special-collections-and-archives/ Airline Schedules Table of Contents Summary Information .................................................................................................................................... 3 Scope and Content ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Series Description .......................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative Information ............................................................................................................................ 4 Related Materials ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Controlled Access Headings .......................................................................................................................... 5 Collection Inventory ....................................................................................................................................... 6 - Page 2 - Airline Schedules Summary Information Repository:
    [Show full text]
  • High Arctic Theatre for All Audiences
    High Arctic theatre for all audiences WHITNEY LACKENBAUER The Globe and Mail September 14, 2010 The Arctic is cast in many roles by many people these days. The beauty of Operation Nanook, the “sovereignty and presence patrolling exercise” currently playing out in the High Arctic, is that all Canadians can and should applaud it. Some purveyors of polar peril see the Arctic as a region on the precipice of international conflict. Unsettled boundary disputes, dreams of newly accessible resources, legal uncertainties, sovereignty concerns and an alleged Arctic “arms race” point to the “use it or lose it” scenario repeatedly raised by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government. A display of Canadian Forces capabilities certainly fits this script. Soldiers from 32 Canadian Brigade Group in Ontario, deployed north as an Arctic Response Company Group, are joined by Canadian Rangers to provide “boots on the ground” in Resolute, Pond Inlet and other Qiqiktani communities. Three naval ships, a dive team, helicopters and transport and patrol aircraft round out this visible demonstration of Canada’s military capabilities. On the other hand, commentators who emphasize that the circumpolar world is more representative of co-operation than competition can hold up Operation Nanook as an appropriate exercise of Canada’s capabilities. We are exercising our sovereignty by inviting our closest neighbours, the Danes and the Americans, to participate. We are putting aside the well-managed disputes over tiny Hans Island, the oil-rich Beaufort Sea and the Northwest Passage and working with the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard and the Royal Danish Navy to enhance our ability to operate together.
    [Show full text]
  • Module-7 Lecture-29 Flight Experiment
    Module-7 Lecture-29 Flight Experiment: Instruments used in flight experiment, pre and post flight measurement of aircraft c.g. Module Agenda • Instruments used in flight experiments. • Pre and post flight measurement of center of gravity. • Experimental procedure for the following experiments. (a) Cruise Performance: Estimation of profile Drag coefficient (CDo ) and Os- walds efficiency (e) of an aircraft from experimental data obtained during steady and level flight. (b) Climb Performance: Estimation of Rate of Climb RC and Absolute and Service Ceiling from experimental data obtained during steady climb flight (c) Estimation of stick free and fixed neutral and maneuvering point using flight data. (d) Static lateral-directional stability tests. (e) Phugoid demonstration (f) Dutch roll demonstration 1 Instruments used for experiments1 1. Airspeed Indicator: The airspeed indicator shows the aircraft's speed (usually in knots ) relative to the surrounding air. It works by measuring the ram-air pressure in the aircraft's Pitot tube. The indicated airspeed must be corrected for air density (which varies with altitude, temperature and humidity) in order to obtain the true airspeed, and for wind conditions in order to obtain the speed over the ground. 2. Attitude Indicator: The attitude indicator (also known as an artificial horizon) shows the aircraft's relation to the horizon. From this the pilot can tell whether the wings are level and if the aircraft nose is pointing above or below the horizon. This is a primary instrument for instrument flight and is also useful in conditions of poor visibility. Pilots are trained to use other instruments in combination should this instrument or its power fail.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants and Contributions
    TABLED DOCUMENT 287-18(3) TABLED ON NOVEMBER 1, 2018 Grants and Contributions Results Report 2017 – 2018 Subventions et Contributions Le present document contient la traduction française du résumé et du message du ministre Rapport 2017 – 2018 October 2018 | Octobre 2018 If you would like this information in another official language, call us. English Si vous voulez ces informations dans une autre langue officielle, contactez-nous. French Kīspin ki nitawihtīn ē nīhīyawihk ōma ācimōwin, tipwāsinān. Cree Tłı̨chǫ yatı k’ę̀ę̀. Dı wegodı newǫ dè, gots’o gonede. Tłı̨chǫ Ɂerıhtł’ıś Dëne Sųłıné yatı t’a huts’elkër xa beyáyatı theɂą ɂat’e, nuwe ts’ën yółtı. Chipewyan Edı gondı dehgáh got’ı̨e zhatıé k’ę́ę́ edatł’éh enahddhę nıde naxets’ę́ edahłı.́ South Slavey K’áhshó got’ı̨ne xǝdǝ k’é hederı ɂedı̨htl’é yerınıwę nı ́dé dúle. North Slavey Jii gwandak izhii ginjìk vat’atr’ijąhch’uu zhit yinohthan jì’, diits’àt ginohkhìi. Gwich’in Uvanittuaq ilitchurisukupku Inuvialuktun, ququaqluta. Inuvialuktun ᑖᒃᑯᐊ ᑎᑎᕐᒃᑲᐃᑦ ᐱᔪᒪᒍᕕᒋᑦ ᐃᓄᒃᑎᑐᓕᕐᒃᓯᒪᓗᑎᒃ, ᐅᕙᑦᑎᓐᓄᑦ ᐅᖄᓚᔪᓐᓇᖅᑐᑎᑦ. Inuktitut Hapkua titiqqat pijumagupkit Inuinnaqtun, uvaptinnut hivajarlutit. Inuinnaqtun Indigenous Languages Secretariat: 867-767-9346 ext. 71037 Francophone Affairs Secretariat: 867-767-9343 TABLE OF CONTENTS MINISTER’S MESSAGE ............................................................. i MESSAGE DU MINISTRE .......................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................ 3 RÉSUMÉ .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • BEECH D18S/ D18C & RCAF EXPEDITER Mk.3 (Built at Wichita, Kansas Between 1945 and 1957)
    Last updated 10 March 2021 BEECH 18 PRODUCTION LIST Compiled by Geoff Goodall PART 2: BEECH D18S/ D18C & RCAF EXPEDITER Mk.3 (Built at Wichita, Kansas between 1945 and 1957) Beech D18S VH-FIE (A-808) flown by owner Rod Lovell at Mangalore, Victoria in April 1984. Photo by Geoff Goodall The D18S was the first new commercial Beechcraft model at the end of World War II. It began a production run of 1,800 Beech 18 variants for the post-war market (D18S, D18C, E18S, G18S, H18), all built by Beech Aircraft Company at their Wichita Kansas plant. The “S” suffix indicated it was powered by the reliable 450hp P&W Wasp Junior series. The first D18S c/n A-1 was first flown in October 1945 at Beech field, Wichita. On 5 December 1945 the D18S received CAA Approved Type Certificate No.757, the first to be issued to any post-war aircraft. The first delivery of a new model D18S to a customer departed Wichita the following day. From 1947 the D18C model was available as an executive version with more powerful 525hp Continental R-9A radials, also offered as the D18C-T passenger transport approved by CAA for feeder airlines. Beech assigned c/n prefix "A-" to D18S production, and "AA-" to the small number of D18Cs. Total production of the D18S, D18C and Canadian Expediter Mk.3 models was 1,035 aircraft. A-1 D18S NX44592 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS: prototype, ff Wichita 10.45/48 (FAA type certification flight test program until 11.45) NC44592 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS 46/48 (prototype D18S, retained by Beech as demonstrator) N44592 Tobe Foster Productions, Lubbock TX 6.2.48 retired by 3.52 further details see Beech 18 by Parmerter p.184 A-2 D18S NX44593 Beech Aircraft Co, Wichita KS: ff Wichita 11.45 NC44593 reg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 81 | Issue 1 Article 3 2002 The rT ansition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety? Renè David-Cooper Federal Court of Appeal of Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Renè David-Cooper, The Transition to Safety Management Systems (SMS) in Aviation: Is Canada Deregulating Flight Safety?, 81 J. Air L. & Com. 33 (2002) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol81/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. THE TRANSITION TO SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (SMS) IN AVIATION: IS CANADA DEREGULATING FLIGHT SAFETY? RENE´ DAVID-COOPER* ABSTRACT In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) adopted Annex 19 to the Chicago Convention to implement Safety Management Systems (SMS) for airlines around the world. While most ICAO Member States worldwide are still in the early stages of introducing SMS, Canada became the first and only ICAO country in 2008 to fully implement SMS for all Canadian-registered airlines. This article will highlight the documented shortcomings of SMS in Canada during the implementation of the first ever SMS framework in civil aviation. While air carriers struggled to un- derstand and introduce SMS into their operations, this article will illustrate how Transport Canada (TC) did not have the knowledge or the necessary resources to properly guide airline operators during this transition, how SMS was improperly tai- lored for smaller air carriers, and how the Canadian govern- ment canceled safety inspections around the country, leaving many air carriers partially unregulated.
    [Show full text]
  • BAN 2008-00231-4 13-3 3806079 Open.Xls FA 13-3
    BAN 2008-00231-4 13-3_3806079_open.xls FA 13-3 RG Accession no. Box / File no. / No. de Part / Title / Titre Date 2 Date 2 / No. Boîte dossier Partie d'acquisition RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0001E 1 TREASURY BOARD - ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 (RCMP) PENSION CONTINUATION REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0001F 1 CONSEIL DU TRESOR - REGLEMENT SUR LA CONTINUATION 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 DES PENSIONS DE LA GENDARMERIE ROYALE DU CANADA RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0002E 1 TRANSPORT - PACIFIC PILOTAGE FRASER RIVER TARIFF 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 REGULATIONS REVISION RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0002F 1 TRANSPORT - REGLEMENT SUR LES TARIFS DE PILOTAGE DU 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 PACIFIQUE (FLEUVE FRASER) RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0003E 1 VETERANS AFFAIRS - VETERANS TREATMENT REGULATIONS 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 AMENDMENTS RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0003F 1 ANCIEN COMBATTANT - REGLEMENT SUR LE TRAITEMENT 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 DES ANCIENS COMBATTANTS RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0004E 1 NATIONAL REVENUE TAXATION - UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 (COLLECTION OF PREMIUMS) REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0004F 1 REVENU NATIONAL - REGLEMENT SUR L'ASSURANCE 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 CHOMAGE (PERCEPTION DES COTISATIONS) RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0005E 1 ENVIRONMENT - BRITISH COLUMBIA FISHERY REGULATIONS 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 AMENDMENTS RG13 2008-00231-4 1 HQLEG-1976-0005F 1 ENVIRONNEMENT - REGLEMENT DE PECHE DE LA COLOMBIE 1976-01-01 1976-12-31 BRITANNIQUE 2021-01-05 1/427 BAN 2008-00231-4 13-3_3806079_open.xls FA 13-3 RG Accession no.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeox FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA
    jEOX FP)1.0 CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH FORUM Lip LE GROUPE DE RECHERCHES SUR LES TRANSPORTS AU CANADA 20th ANNUAL MEETING PROCEEDINGS TORONTO, ONTARIO MAY 1985 591 AT THE CROSSROADS - THE FINANCIAL HEALTH OF CANADA'S LEVEL I AIRLINES by R.W. Lake,. J.M. Serafin and A., Mozes Research Branch, Canadian Transport Commission INTRODUCTION In 1981 the Air Transport Committee and the 'Research Branch of the Canadian Transport Commission on a joint basis, and in conjunction with the major Canadian airlines, (who formed a Task Force) undertook a programme of studies concerning airline pricing and financial performance. This paper is based on a CTC Working Paper' which presented current data on the topic, and interpreted them in the context of the financial and regulatory circumstances faced by the airlines as of July 1984. ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVE The trends illustrated in Figure 1 suggest that air trans- portation may have reached the stage of a mature industry with air . travel/transport no longer accounting for an increasing proportion of economic activity. This mile/stone in the industry's life cycle, if in fact it has been reached, would suggest that an apparent fall in the income elasticity of demand for air travel between 1981 and 1983 could persist. As data reflecting the apparent demand re- surgence of 1984 become available, the picture may change, but 1 LAKE Figure 2 Figure 1 AIR FARE INDICES AIR TRANSPORT REVENUE AS A PERCENT OF GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT 1.90 1.20.. 1.80. 1.70 - 1.10 -, 1.60. ..... 1.50. .. 8 .: . 1.40 -, r,.
    [Show full text]
  • RFP) Page 1 of 12 Canada – Canada – Défense Accommodations for OP NANOOK 14 National Defence Nationale Iqaluit NU W8484-15-8222
    Government of Gouvernement du REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Page 1 of 12 Canada – Canada – Défense Accommodations for OP NANOOK 14 National Defence nationale Iqaluit NU W8484-15-8222 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) DND Reference Number: W8484‐15‐8222 Accommodations for OPERATION NANOOK 14 Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada Government of Gouvernement du REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Page 2 of 12 Canada – Canada – Défense Accommodations for OP NANOOK 14 National Defence nationale Iqaluit NU W8484-15-8222 Request for Proposal Accommodations in Iqaluit NU For the Department of National Defence TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Security Requirement 2. Statement of Requirement 3. Debriefings 7. Trade Agreements PART 2 - BIDDER INSTRUCTIONS 1. Standard Instructions, Clauses and Conditions 2. Submission of Bids 3. Enquiries - Bid Solicitation 4. Applicable Laws PART 3 - BID PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS 1. Bid Preparation Instructions PART 4 - EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND BASIS OF SELECTION 1. Evaluation Procedures 2. Basis of Selection PART 5 - CERTIFICATIONS 1. Certifications Required Precedent to Contract Award PART 6 - RESULTING CONTRACT CLAUSES 1. Introduction 2. Security 3. Terms and Conditions of Contract 4. Priority of documents 5. Period of the Contract 6. Contract Amount 7. Departmental Representatives 8. Payment 9. Invoice Submissions 10. Appropriate Laws 11. Compliance with Certifications 12. Insurance List of Annexes: Annex A Statement of Requirement Annex B Basis of Payment Government of Gouvernement du REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) Page 3 of 12 Canada – Canada – Défense Accommodations for OP NANOOK 14 National Defence nationale Iqaluit NU W8484-15-8222 PART 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Security Requirement There is no security requirement associated with the requirement.
    [Show full text]