Thailand Report EXPLOITATION OF BOYS EXPLORE THE SEXUAL GLOBAL INITIATIVE TO
1 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 2 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report Tel: +6622153388|www.ecpat.org |[email protected] Bangkok, 10400Thailand 328/1 Phaya Thai Road, Ratchathewi, ECPAT International Published by: © ECPAT International, 2021 ECPAT International. of Boys: ThailandReport. Bangkok: Initiative toExplore the Sexual Exploitation ECPAT International. (2021). TheGlobal Suggested citation: ECPAT. extracted material must beprovided to A copy oftherelevant publication using of thesource asECPAT International. ECPAT International andacknowledgment reproduced onlywithpermissionfrom Extracts from thispublication may be Vicky Yang Cover illustration by: Manida Naebklang Design andlayout by: opinions expressed. donors does not constitute endorsement of the of ECPAT International. Thesupportfrom these The views expressed herein are solelythose Agency (Sida). International Development Cooperation programming supportfrom theSwedish ECPAT International alsoacknowledges core Thailand Institute ofJustice. with thegenerous financialassistance ofthe This research project was made possible
diverse SOGIE: Conducting theinterviews with young peopleof for theirprofessional supportin: like to acknowledge thefollowing organisations population for this research. We would therefore Thailand that serve andrepresent thetarget working inChiangMai,Pattaya andBangkok, involved partnerships withlocal organisations Different elements ofthis research project throughout. coordinating different aspectsofthe project Foundation Thailand for their expertise and for and KhunAroonded Chermueat UrbanLight Paan Jongpaijitsakul, KhunKampon Maichandee also like to thankKhunMaiaMounsher, Khun design, implementation andanalysis work. We’d Davis andMrAlastair Hilton for theirexpert project consultants DrMeredith Dank,MrJarrett ECPAT would like to express appreciation to Justice and ECPAT International during2019-2020. partnership between theThailandInstitute of This report istheresult ofacollaborative ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
CAREMAT Khun Phapawara Ainlaofrom V-Power Urban Light Foundation Thailand Khun ‘Pop’ Kampon Maichandeefrom Rainbow SkyAssociation ofThailand NatthawirojnKhun ‘Nonny’ Inthanin from exploitation in Thailand. and more effective for boys experiencing sexual the path easier to accessingsupportservices experiences andinsights inthehopeofmaking frontline staff whoagreed to talk abouttheir the participation ofthe youngpeopleand This study would have notbeenpossiblewithout work throughout theproject. Lephilibert for theirThailanguage translation Christmas Kongmak andKhunNatthanicha Puthawong, KhunPattaravadee Raha,Khun We would like to thankKhunMonticha and Mr Nattawut Worakhanta. project includeMsKohnwilai Teppunkoonngam Institute ofJustice who alsoworked onthis final report. The former staff oftheThailand who reviewed andprovided comments for the Mingmongkol andMsChernpornRuangsawasdi, Ms Ornpawee Uanirun,MsKanjanachat of theteam includingMsUsaLerdsrisuntad, and Policy Coordination andthemembers Neamhom, DirectorExternal ofOffice Relations From ThailandInstitute ofJustice, MrKittipoom reviews ofthelegal analysis. Santanee Ditsayabut for providing technical thank KhunWorrawan Jirathanapiwat andKhun Ms SubhaNivedha andMrMarkMcKillop.We analysis by MsAndrea Varrella, supported by was provided by DrMarkKavenagh andlegal From ECPAT International, technical coordination providers survey: Coordinating andadministering thefrontline
SISTERS Foundation Rainbow SkyAssociation ofThailand Light Foundation Thailand Khun ‘Mon’Aroonded Chermueat Urban
1 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 2 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report EXCHANGING SEX INTERVIEWS WITHSOGIEIDENTIFYING YOUNG PEOPLE WHO ARE SURVEY OFFRONTLINE WORKERS SUPPORTING BOYS...... BACKGROUND ANDRATIONALE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS Current LivingSituation Sample Demographics Discussion ofSurvey Results Evaluation. ofExisting SupportServices Perceived Barriers for Males. Understanding ofMaleVulnerability andSexual Exploitation Perpetrators andFacilitators. Sample Demographics Limitations Ethical Approval andConsiderations Methodology Activities andAimsofthe Research Project. A note onterminology. Support System Community Relationships. Friendships. Childhood Upbringing Money Debt. Relationship Status. Access to andAssistance Services . Drug Use Health andProtection . Networks. Safety Plans. Violence andAbuse Family and Friends’Knowledge Current Sex Work Experience Entry into Sex Work. Migration First JobExperience. Running Away Experiences. Violence ExperiencedwhenEngaging inSex Work Experience withRecruiters...... 17 38 10 38 29 19 19 17 15 11 30 26 12 12 42 43 39 39 39 39 15 57 56 54 58 55 53 53 48 46 45 44 44 43 51 53 4 RECOMMENDATIONS WITH AFOCUS ONBOYS...... THAI LEGAL PROVISIONS ONSEXUAL EXPLOITATION OFCHILDREN Key Consolidated AppliedLearningsfrom theResearch andOverall Recommendations Recommendations from theAnalysis oftheThaiLegal Framework Recommendations Emerging from theSOGIE-Identifying Young People. Recommendations Emerging from theFrontline Providers. Discussion ofAnalysis ofThaiLegal Framework Access to Compensation Access to Recovery andReintegration Child-Sensitive Justice. National Complaint Mechanismsand Reporting. Access to Justice and Remedies Extraterritoriality andExtradition Understanding Protections from Sexual Exploitation for Boys inThailand The Legal Landscape for Children’s Rights inThailand Thailand’s International and Regional Legal Commitments. Discussion ofInterviews withSOGIE-Identifying Young People ...... Sex Work andSelfWorth. Youth’ Perceptions ofEngaging inSex Work. Experiences withthePolice ...... 64 83 77 65 60 67 87 85 83 80 80 79 64 62 60 59 87 78 77 81
3 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 4 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report The specificobjectives ofthis project were: This report presents thosefindings. and alegal analysis were carried outduring2020. identifying youth whoare currently exchange sex, frontline providers, service interviews withSOGIE SOGIE identifying youth inThailand,asurvey with To capture thevulnerabilities facing boys and sexual exploitation ofchildren. forefront ofactions to prevent and respond to the in Thailand,acountry that has often been at the experience ofboys andSOGIEidentifying youth of theseneeds.Thisreport focuses on the exploitation ofboys attempts toaddress some ECPAT’s globalinitiative to explore the sexual exploitation ofchildren ofall genders. for evidence-based understanding ofthesexual identity and expression (SOGIE).There isaneed those withdiverse sexual orientation or gender more vulnerable to sexual exploitation, suchas particular groups ofchildren are known to be than iscommonly thought. Furthermore, in somesettings boys are muchmore impacted exploitation ofboys that does exist indicates that on girls.Thelimited evidence aboutthesexual data doesexist, itisoften limited to focusing child sexual exploitation is generally when lacking, affects boys. Whiledata ontheprevalence ofall understanding ofhow childsexual exploitation apparent that there isagap intheglobal In recent years, ithasbecome increasingly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
these. and community-based initiatives toaddress for policymakers, providers socialservice exploitation) anddevelop recommendations sex (includinginstances ofchildsexual and push/pullfactors into exchanging experiences ofSOGIE-identified youth To buildthelimited understanding ofthe training andsupport. recommendations for capacity building, sexual exploitation ofboys andprovide of frontline providers service toward the To identify the key perceptions andattitudes Interviews withtwenty SOGIE identifying youth under-reported area ofchildprotection. valuable insight into anunder-researched and experiences reported inthesesurveys offer anecdotes, andtheestimates, perceptions and shared additional observations andillustrative Manyand weaknesses ofservices. participants sexual exploitation andopinionson the strengths what makes boys andSOGIE youth vulnerable to included askingparticipants theirperspectives on and shortopenanswer questions. Questions consisted of89multiple-choice,scenariobased sexual exploitation completed thesurvey, which provide for services young malevictimsof Sixty-five frontline providers service who currently caseload whichincludedboys. of thethree sites identified andhad acurrent experience inwelfare provision service inone they were adultswithat least twelve months of for thesurvey were included onthebasisthat survivors ofsexual exploitation. Participants Thai organisations working directly withmale Rainbow SkyAssociation ofThailand,whichare Foundation ofThailand,SISTERS Foundation and undertaken inpartnership withUrbanLight The frontline welfare providers’ survey was Bangkok andChiangMai. and Pattaya, andinterviews with young peoplein with frontline workers inBangkok, ChiangMai Thai legal framework. Surveys were completed exchanging sex andc)detailed analysis ofthe interviews with SOGIEidentifying youth currently a) asurvey offrontline welfare providers, b) different research activities were undertaken: of boys andSOGIEyouth inThailand. Three a better understanding ofthesexual exploitation The mainpurposeofthisstudy was to establish METHODOLOGY
frameworks to inform future legal advocacy. method to review nationallegal exploitation ofboys usinga standardised opportunities inaddressingthesexual To identify thelegalgaps, barriersand sex andtheircurrent experiences ofthis. how respondents became involved inexchanging about family background andrelationships, to Questions intheseinterviews ranged from asking safety whileparticipating inthissensitive study. to ensureof supportservices theirpsychological required to already beconnected to someform in ChiangMaiandBangkok. Participants were also exchange ofsex for money and/or material goods members ofthesamesex) andinvolved inthe SOGIE (orasheterosexual butengaged insex with being anage of15–24years old,identifying as Specific eligibilitycriteria includedparticipants conducting interviews. They completed two weeks oftraining priorto some similarlived experiences to theparticipants. Interviewers were carefully identified andhad with SOGIEidentifying young people. Thailand inBangkok, whoallspecialiseinworking Chiang MaiandRainbowSkyAssociation of Urban Light Foundation Thailand, V-Power in in partnership withlocal organisations; CAREMAT, involved inexchanging sex were alsoconducted was sought andobtained for theproject. changes were incorporated andethical approval in December2019,following whichsuggested Government Ministries that took placeinBangkok meeting including representatives from key Thai were presented anddiscussedinanexpert group preliminary findingsoftheanalysis oflegislation The proposed methodology, research tools and confirmation. by ahighlyrespected ThaiPublicProsecutor for project andthedraft analysis was peer-reviewed checklist ofover 120items was created for the countries undertheGlobalBoys’ Initiative. A International, whichwillbefurtherusedinother a method andtools developed by ECPAT on boys. Theanalysis was conducted utilising exploitation ofchildren, withaspecific focus legal framework addresses sexual abuseand Institute ofJustice toassess how thecurrent in partnership withstaff from theThailand legal framework, ECPAT International worked To complete thedetailed analysis oftheThai
5 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 6 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report practice ofadult’s touching or playing withaboy’s were; extreme poverty (75%);thecultural increase boys’ vulnerability to sexual exploitation Participants reported that common factors that training, andsupportfor parents andcaregivers. access to legal support,education and vocational a diversity was ofservices available, suchas working inChiangMaiwhoindicated more of Positive signs were evident from providers service Pattaya, andmuchhigher41%inChiangMai). families and caregivers (0%inBangkok, 4%in indicated theprovision for ofsupportservices addressing boys’ needs – only 17% of respondents providers took anindividualistic approach to majority ofprogramming reported by service and foster protective mechanisms.However, the families to prevent risks ofsexual exploitation would suggest a needfor to services engage with who have experienced sexual exploitation. This family asakey challenge for boys andyoung men also commonly identified disconnection from available reported. services providers Service However, economic supportwas oneoftheleast highlighted asamainvulnerability factor for boys. Similarly, theneedfor economic support was of boys who have experienced sexual exploitation. understood to comprehensively meet theneeds arethese services important, they were not andcommunity outreach.health services While on counselling andpsychosocial support,sexual providedservices were very generic, focussing these factors. Instead, responses illustrated how programming focussing addressing onservices respondents indicated any involvement in vulnerability factors for boys, however, few and childhoodhomeexperiences were key rather thanneedsled.For example, poverty suggesting that programming is resource led, provided,needs notaligningwell withservices areof services available to boys, withperceived Participants indicated that a limitedvery range within families andtheindividual. spectrum, includingwidersociety, community, and interlinked across thedomainsofsocial are sexually exploited are multiple, complex consequences andresulting needsofboys who survey illustrate that thecauses, riskfactors, Key findingsofthefrontline providers’ Frontline Providers’ Survey KEY FINDINGS a strong need for increased capacities of staff and It isclearfrom participant responses that there is expressed responses. for providers service were themost commonly for training, awareness andcapacity building useful inorder to better supportboys, theneed When asked aboutwhat key resources would be context. understanding thenuancesofchild’s case and resulted inlimited disclosures anddifficultiesin difficult todescribe their ownvulnerabilities a senseoftrust withboys, andboys findingit vulnerabilities. Thesedifficultiesincultivating difficulties that boys faceindescribing their own providersService alsonoted gender-specific as common barriers inworking withboys. andconfidentiality’ ‘engaging boys’ were named relationships withmalevictims.‘Providing challenges inbeingableto connect andbuild Concerningly, respondents often reported exploitation. are seento be‘actively intheir own engaging’ have anunconscious biastowards children who questions alsoindicated that providers service ‘promiscuous’. Findingsfrom thescenario-based youth are more sexually ‘naturally’ active and unhelpful assumption that gay andtransgender perception ofvulnerability stems from the exploitation. Itispossiblethat this reduced featured definitive examples ofchild sexual despiteidentifying, the fact that thescenarios when thevictimsinscenarios were SOGIE of vulnerability andrecognition of exploitation respondents indicated adiminished perception the hypothetical basedscenarioquestions, particularly ofSOGIEidentifying youth.In exploitation ofchildren inpractical scenarios, in frontline workers’ abilityto identify sexual The data alsoidentified notable challenges masculinity, sexuality andhomophobia. to beincreased dueto cultural beliefs around from otherstudies whichidentify vulnerability interesting asit contrasts finding, with evidence vulnerability to sexual exploitation. This was an considered providers by service to impactaboy’s with oneormore disabilities were factors least belonging to anethnic minoritygroup andliving (63%). Taboos surrounding sex andsexuality, increased accessandexposure to theInternet access andexposure to pornography (68%) and genitals ininfancy andearlychildhood(72%); led young peopleto self-harming andsuicidal rejection, andsome cases of familial rejection ladyboys were most likely to experience familial emotional abuse. Respondents whoidentified as ostracized and/or experienced severe verbal and who came outto their family were immediately abusive to loving andaccepting. Several youths with theirfamilies ranged from violent and part financiallypoor, thoughtheir relationships that participants’ upbringings were for themost Perhaps unsurprisingly, theinterviews showed communities, and employers. orientation or gender identity by families, rejection anddiscrimination basedon sexual family poverty; familial violenceandabuse; pressures to exchange sex. Suchdrivers included past experiences are drivers for theircurrent findings ofpast research: SOGIEdiverse youths’ The data from theinterviews echoesthe Mai where they were interviewed. cities, withonly four beingoriginallyfrom Chiang provinces withinThailandandthenmigrated to vast majority ofparticipants came from rural often involved quite difficult circumstances. The they became involved inexchanging sex, which shared anarray ofstories abouthow andwhy The 20young people interviewed for thisactivity people Interviews with SOGIEidentifying young deserves attention. children by thosewithinlocal communities also indicates theoccurrence ofsexual exploitation of great dealofthediscourse inThailand,thisresult the context oftravel andtourism, consumes a exploitation ofchildren by foreigners, often in who were unfamiliar to thechild.While sexual managed by participants were Thainationals majority ofoffenders (58%)involved in cases from thesurvey alsoshowed that thevast Finally, itisinteresting to note that thefindings gender normsandsexual identity. cultural beliefs related to abuseandexploitation, providers to address underlyingsocialand all training andawareness raising ofservice the importance ofapplyingagender lensto sexual exploitation. Thedata alsoillustrates to disclosevulnerabilities and experience of connecting withboys whomay be reluctant tools andtrainings to aidinunderstanding and individuals andthedevelopment ofspecialised they were sending essential money home. that theirfamilies accepted thesituation because selling sex said they eitherfelt empowered, or their families about theircurrent engagement in Interestingly, those few who saidthey had told meet perpetrators. but didvery little to stop himfrom going out to a childknew hewas involved inexchanging sex, that thestaff at achildren’s homehe was livingas One worrying story from arespondent indicated finding outasthey feared negative repercussions. being adamant abouttheirfamily andfriendsnot families andfriends,with somerespondents involvement inexchanging sex secret from The majorityofrespondents kept their for ladyboys dueto discrimination. sell sex because there are few jobopportunities ladyboy reported that shefeels sheisforced to to survive. Onerespondent whoidentified asa it was their onlyway ofmakingenoughmoney that they didnotwant to sellsex butfelt that in at thetime.Some respondents reported client at thebarorrestaurant they were working sex by friendswhowere already doingitora Most respondents were introduced to exchanging of exchange for goods, food, shelter andsecurity. from thestart, thoughthere were someexamples majority ofcases, sex was exchanged for money into thesex trade beingat theage of12.Inthe first happened),withthe youngest reported entry (two respondents didnotdisclosetheage this and almost halfwere 18years ofage orolder money, goods, shelter, protection, and/or status age of18whenthey first exchanged sex for Almost halfoftherespondents were underthe growing up. within theircommunities whenthey were that they were treated well andwere supported struggles. Similarly, overall respondents alsofelt identity andsupported themthrough familial to accept theirsexual orientation and gender stated that theirpeers growing upwere thefirst complicated anddifficult for respondents, most While familial relationships were predominantly for others to escape severe long-term abuse. because ofanindividualargument withaparent, to escape familial violence in the home – for some away from homeat least onceasachild,primarily ideation. Almost allofthe respondents (16) ran
7 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 8 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report would stop trading sex ifthey could, however felt that 18ofthe20participants stated that they neededisaccentuatedservices whenconsidering The importance provision of service aligningwith financial independencefrom their family. drug use,runningaway andanoverall needfor than at home,whichsometimes led to truancy, resulted inthemspending more timewithfriends orientation and gender identity and expression Further, familial rejection basedontheirsexual the needto runaway to escape theviolence. up around familial violenceandabuse, majority ofyoung peopledisclosedgrowing SOGIE youth told adifferent story. The vast technology andtheInternet aspushfactors. alcohol anddrugmisuseincreased accessto boys’ genitals asaway ofshowing affection, exposure to pornography, thepractice of touching listed arange ofothervulnerabilities -accessand for why SOGIEyouth exchange sex, providers stated by boththeproviders andyoung people sex trade. Whilepoverty was themaindriver key push/pullfactors for youth entering the compared to frontline providers service onthe comparing theanswers SOGIEyouths gave providedservices isfurtherreflected when needednotaligningwith The issueofservices those whoneedto usethem. providedwith services notmeeting theneedsof providers survey, theseresults show theissues highlighted withresults from thefrontline service assistance, mentorship andcounselling. Aswas employment opportunities,financialaid,legal wished were available, responses included asked ifthere were that services respondents often under-funded andunder-resourced. When these programmes were notsufficient and were Bangkok andChiangMaifound themhelpful, While thosewhoengaged in withservices and livingwage opportunities. legalhealth counselling, andeducational services, suchasvocationalservices, training, mental to bealackoforganisations that provided other were mainly healthproviders, andthere seemed organisations respondents were connected with did notknow ofany specificorganisations. The from providers for quite sometime,butothers Bangkok. Somehadbeenreceiving assistance access to providers service inChiangMaiand show avaried level ofawareness andcurrent Responses to questions aboutaccess to services grooming andsexual extortion are notcurrently online streaming of childsexual abuse,online child sexual abusematerials. Thismeansthat the sexual exploitation otherthanthose related to criminalising offences related to onlinechild Concerningly, there iscurrently nolaw explicitly device, for example, inthe form oflive streaming. sexual abusematerials withoutstoring itontheir offenders to avoid punishment by accessingchild personal use.Further, legal loopholescould allow offered withtheintent oftrade, butonly for abuse material isnotproduced, disseminated, loopholes inreference to cases where childsexual include childsexual abusematerial, can create import and export of anything obscene, which can dissemination, offering, sellingorpossession, of theprovision criminalising theproduction, to onlinechildsexual exploitation. The wording There are furtherlimitations oflegislation relating abuse material consensually withanotherchild. produce andshare self-generated childsexual children can beconsidered offenders ifthey Similarly, astheage ofcriminalliabilityis10, Suppression ofProstitution ActB.E.2539(1996). contained inSection5ofThePrevention and engaging inspecificacts related to prostitution offenders by thecriminalisation ofallpersons prostitution are atriskofbeingidentified as Children whoare victimsof exploitation in for activities relating tochild sexual exploitation. always adequately protected from criminalisation The analysis alsoidentified that children are not of childsexual exploitation. how thelaw isappliedinpractice for allsurvivors exploration isnecessary to understand ifthisis allows for equaltreatment ofallchildren, further regardless ofgender. However, whilethelaw blind, meaningitisappliedto allchildren the relevant Thailegislation islargely gender Our legal analysis hasidentified, positively, that Legal analysis liveable-wage employment opportunities. benefits, mental health care and counselling and mentorship, assistance withlegal documents and training, educational opportunities, foodsecurity, help them.Theneedsthey identified includedjob would needalternative options to andservices stop trading sex, respondents expressed that they means for meeting theirbasicfinancialneeds. To that exchanging sex seemedlike theironlyviable child asapriority. efficient system keepingthebest interests ofthe resources, bothfinancialandhuman to create an the research hasidentified adire need formore on crimesrelating to childsexual exploitation and There isnodedicated unitofthepoliceworking and address reports ofchildsexual exploitation. the capability oflaw enforcement to receive The legal analysis alsoraised concerns about child sexual abuseandonlinegrooming. Bill inprocess to criminalisethelive streaming of however, there at thetimeofwriting, isa draft prohibited underThailaw. Encouragingly of survivors. offenders rather thanaccommodating theneeds current legislation focuses ontheprosecution of access to fullrecovery andrehabilitation asthe ensuring that survivors, bothboys andgirls,have limitations. Further, there iscurrently nolaw be thwarted because oftheshortstatute of In thesecases, survivors’ accessto justice can or they may notseethemselves asavictim. what hashappenedto themuntil muchlater children notfullyunderstanding theseverity of disclosure is often delayed for reasons suchas This isnotsufficient, consideringthat survivors’ sexual exploitation offences isonly15 years. highlights how thestatute oflimitations for child A final key observation from thelegal analysis
9 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 10 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report their abilityto seekcare”. constraining theirhelp-seekingbehaviour and is unquestioningly conditioned by gendernorms, common to allgenders, boys accessto support factors for sexual exploitation andabuseare impacted, andsometimes more. that incertain contexts, boys are just asheavily the limited evidence available onboys suggests is somewhat better researched andunderstood, While theimpactofsexual exploitation ongirls out boys andqueer-identifying young people. methodologies that underrepresent orleave of policies,practices, advocacy and research Gender normshave informed thedevelopment 6 7 affects boys. of how sexual exploitation ofchildren (SEC) awareness of the gap intheglobalunderstanding In recent years, there hasbeenan increasing different geographic settings. levels, across all ethnic andcultural groups, and in in allsocioeconomic groups, ofalleducational 2 1 or region is‘immune’. millions ofchildren worldwide andnocountry exploitation andabuse,isestimated to affect Violence against children, includingsexual 5 3 vulnerabilities ofboys; understanding oftheuniqueexperiences and often limited to adolescent girls,obscuring any exploitation andabuseofchildren, samplesare countries collect prevalence data onsexual specifically. For example, inthe rare cases that this iseven more sowhenlookingat boys 4 those withdiverse sexual orientation or gender vulnerable to sexual exploitation thanothers, like particular groups are known to bemore BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE Olivier, S. & Thurasukarn, O. (2018). persecuted because oftheir sexual orientation and gender identity. (2016) S. Chatterji, & S., Kahn, E.J., Alessi, Children. abuse andexploitation –a40-country benchmarking index, of thesexual exploitation ofboys. V.,Josenhans, Wekerle,Kavenagh,& S., Smith, M., press). (in C. Children by 2030 Special Representativeon Secretary the July). General of the of (2019, Office VAC. Boys to Sexual Exploitation inManila,Philippines, (2015), G Miles, and J Davis (2018) Unit Intelligence Economist The of thesexual exploitation ofboys. Josenhans, V.,Josenhans, Kavenagh,Wekerle, & S., Smith, M., press).(in C. 2 Whiledata ingeneral islacking, . New York: United Nations. 1 Ithappensto children 3 “While many “While vulnerability 4
“They didn’t help me: They shamed me.” A Baseline Study on the Vulnerabilities of Street-InvolvedVulnerabilities of the on Study Baseline me.”A shamed They me: help didn’t “They
Child AbuseandNeglect. Child AbuseandNeglect.
Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Intersex and Queer Youth in Thailand. 5 Additionally,
Methodology paper Out of the Shadows: Shining light on the response to child sexual child to response the on light Shining Shadows: the of Out paper Methodology ‘The darkest times of my life’: Recollections of child abuse among forced migrants forced among abuse child of Recollections life’: my of times darkest ‘The
Manila: Love 146.
London: TheEconomist Intelligence Unit,3
reforms, policy andprogramming. and recovery frameworks to inform legislative and identify appropriate prevention, protection evidence baseofthesexual exploitation ofboys, initiative will consolidate and strengthen the to explore thesexual exploitation ofboys. The International began work onaglobalinitiative To address thisneed,inlate 2018,ECPAT sexual exploitation ofchildren. inform allwork to prevent andrespond to the exploitation ofchildren ofall genders to better a higherqualityevidence-base onthesexual there isaclearneedfor greater advocacy and support for girlsexperiencing sexual exploitation, attention from continued research, advocacy, and While thiscontext by nomeansshoulddetract especially for boys. exploitation ofchildren ofall genders, but equitable discourse andnecessary onthesexual are vulnerable. Thesenormsoften hamper males are strong andresilient, whilefemales sexual exploitation andabusetypically holdthat and femininity relevant to understanding child Systemic and cultural normsaround masculinity homosexuality iscriminalised. if theirperpetrator ismaleincontexts where heterosexual– may even face legal consequences of reprisal. rejectionbullying, from peers or family, fears disclosing abuse,includingpotential violence, face increased risks that can beexacerbated by next page). These young peopleoften already identity and expression (SOGIE–seebox inthe Gender, analysis global need responsibilities: a the rightsand for Gender, analysis global responsibilities: need a rightsand the for
Child Abuseand Neglect51.93-105. 6,7 Boys –whether diverse-SOGIE or Keeping the Promise: Ending Violence againstViolence Promise:Ending Keepingthe Bangkok: Save the are understood to be, astheterm implies,adistinct ‘third’ gender, whichisneitherfully male nor female. ‘third-gender’ or ‘ladyboy’ ‘female’), as identifies and feels but birth, at ‘male’ assigned is who individual ‘trans-women’.or ‘transgender’ understoodis an distinction‘transgender’ more (e.g. a While tobinary be It should also be noted arethator ‘third-gender’ ‘ladyboy’ distinguished from the more international term isusedinthetext,youth. itisbecause When‘ladyboy’ therespondent hasself-identified assuch. the to use term (สาวประเภทสอง) ‘third-gender’ as a more supportive and neutral opted marker has for gender non-conforming report this usage, latter this of Because youth. SOGIE belittle or demean to way,often their peers. However, in some contexts, particularly in provincial area, the word is also used in a derogatory and themselves for identifier an as (กระเทย) ‘ladyboy’ term the use respondents Many participants. the by Thai and language. In interviews terminology and gender,during the data around collection process theheld general rulewere was to mirrordiscussions language used detailed interviewers, with training During imposed by families, communities, andlarger society. are that expectations and obligations, norms, masculinity various the by impacted commonly are they as providers,teachers, others communities.or Their aretheir voices in therefore important discussion this in service parents, by such as identified being of experiences ongoing had have possibly and birth, at ‘male’ assigned were but male, as identify not may who individuals of inclusive intentionally are ‘boys’,we for It should also be considered that while this report focuses on the experiences, gaps in services, and barriers means ofexpression. length of hair, choice of personal voice,pronouns, the restroomsof they feel tonecomfortable among using, many clothing, other in choices include may neither.This or behaviour both, feminine, and/or masculine, appearance be may of which manner individual’s an to refers expression Gender birth. at assigned biological individuals’ sex the sex(their chromosomes accompanyingand anatomical features) with genderthe wasor that individual the align not may or may gender these) (or This self-identifies. individual an which with gender(s) the to refers identity Gender attracted. sexually is individual an which to gender(s) to the to refer is understood orientation Expression’. Sexual and Identity expressions Gender Orientation, ‘Sexual for gender and identity gender stands which acronym, an others), is non-binary,transgender,SOGIE woman, others). third-gender, (man, among among asexual, pansexual, bisexual, gay, (including orientationssexualdiverse with individuals arrayof broad the indicate to‘diverse termSOGIE’ the use to Rather than the more commonly used term ‘Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT), this report opts A note onterminology This initiative project focusesonThailand,and: Thailand Report. Initiative withthis project –Global Boys Initiative: charge withinECPAT International’s GlobalBoys’ Justice for thisproject, itisonceagain leadingthe and partnership withtheThailandInstitute of exploitation ofchildren, andthrough thesupport actions to prevent and respond to sexual Thailand hasoften been at the forefront of
exploitation orabuse; Thailand whohave experienced sexual welfare workers that supportboys in Gathered new data primary from frontline and abuse. young people’s experiences ofsexual exploitation surrounding boys’ anddiverse SOGIEidentifying also helpto break down thestigma and taboos of allgenders. Itishopedthat theresults may are gender-sensitive andaccessible for children inform improvements service to ensure that they The results captured inthisreport are intended to
with afocus onboys. protects children from sexual exploitation, Analysed theThailegal framework that exchanging sex; identifying young peoplewhoare currently vulnerable population ofdiverse SOGIE Gathered new data primary from the
11 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 12 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report aims: This research project hadthree core activitiesand Project Activities andAimsofthe Research 3. 2. 1. exploitation. protect boys from childsexual abuseand capacity ofThainational legislation to building, training,andsupport. provide recommendations for capacity toward thesexual exploitation ofboys and attitudes offrontline providers service Aim: sexual exploitation ofboys. challenges andfactors influencing the of allgenders, andgain insight into promising practices accessible to clients Mai, Bangkok andPattaya), to establish inthreeviolence services sites (Chiang sexual exploitation and gender-based frontline welfare workers providing and administer asurvey to Thai advocacy. legal frameworks to inform futurelegal standardised method to review national sexual exploitation ofboys usinga and opportunitiesinaddressingthe Aim: initiatives toaddressthese. providers,service andcommunity-based recommendations for policymakers, social child sexual exploitation), anddevelop exchanging sex (includinginstances of youth andpush/pullfactors into of theexperiences ofSOGIE-identified Aim: children. have experienced sexual exploitation as money and/or material goods andmay of diverse SOGIEwhoexchange sex for explore thebarriers encountered by youth locations (Bangkok andChiangMai) to Legislative Analysis: SOGIE: Interviews with youthofdiverse Frontline Providers Survey: To identify the key perceptions and To identify thelegalgaps, barriers, To buildthelimited understanding Undertake interviews intwo Analyse the Develop project (Seeethics sectionbelow for details). incorporated andethical approval sought for the Following changes themeeting, were stakeholders. from key ThaiGovernment Ministries andother 2019 andwas attended by representatives meeting that took placeinBangkok inDecember were presented anddiscussedinanexpert group preliminary findingsoftheanalysis oflegislation The proposed methodology, research tools and (analysis ofnational legislation). diverse SOGIE)andadocumentary research tool qualitative research (interviews with youth of quantitative research (frontline providers’ survey), methodology ofthisresearch project included boys inThailand.To generate data, primary the understanding ofthesexual exploitation of to buildanempirical baseto establish abetter The mainpurposeofthisresearch project was Methodology support incompleting such a survey. complexity ofthistopic required explanation and was available to supporttheprocess, asthe One-on-one supportby trained data collectors or laptops) that theparticipants self-completed. participants, usingan onlineplatform (via tablets The survey was thenadministered in-person to frontline staff to participate. considerations ofthe research -and to invite to explain thepurpose,objectives and ethical organisation leadership teams were then held professional networks. Aseriesofmeetings with providing welfare to services children withintheir administrators by identifying organisations Potential participants were identified bythe and thenconducted data collection. pilot tested andimproved the Thailanguage tool, trained by theproject team asadministrators, financially compensated for theirtime)and a numberofdays (partnerorganisations were organisations were seconded by theproject for of sexual exploitation. Staff from thesethree organisations working directly withmale survivors Sky Association ofThailand,whichare Thai of Thailand,SISTERS foundation andRainbow in partnership withUrbanLight Foundation For thisactivity, ECPAT International worked Frontline providers’ survey 8 frontline workers that indicated: Specifically, thesurvey aimed to gather data from data. throughout theanalysis to furtherilluminate the Quotes andcomments are alsoincludedat times and under-reported area ofchildprotection. offer valuable insight into anunder-researched perceptions and experiences reported here administrative counts. However, theestimates, merely recalled estimates rather thandetailed workers inThailand,andcases describedare representative ofthe experiences ofallfrontline It shouldbenoted that thedata isnotstatistically action andprogress inthisarea. the challenges andpotential opportunities for throughout thesurvey that furthershedlight on illustrative anecdotes for open response items participants shared additional observations and choice andshortopen-answer questions. Many The onlinesurvey consisted of89multiple- provide supportto meet theirneeds. andfrontlinesupport services, worker’s abilityto affecting boy’s vulnerability, ability toaccess exploitation ofchildren inThailand and key issues results offer asnapshot ofthe context ofsexual sexual exploitation completed thesurvey. The provide for services young malevictimsof Bangkok, ChiangMai,andPattaya, whocurrently Sixty-five frontline providers service from victims. providers having noactive cases involving male attempted, many were disqualifieddue toservice that althoughapproximately 110surveys were latter exclusion criterion, itisimportant to note caseload whichincludedboys. Basedonthis of thethree sites identified andhadacurrent month- experience provision inservice inone basis that they were adultswithat least twelve Participants for this activity were includedonthe Survival Sex. UrbanInstitute. Dank, M. et al. (2015, February). (2015, al. et M. Dank,
SEC. The impactofcultural andsocialnormson providers;service and The level ofawareness ofSEC amongst providers;service The nature andextent ofSEC referrals to
Surviving the Streets of New York. Experiences of LGTBQ Youth, YMSM, and YWSW Engagedin YWSWLGTBQYouth, York.and of New YMSM, Experiences of Streets the Surviving sample. Theseeligibilitycriteria included an specific eligibilitycriteria for inclusioninthe youth involved in exchanging sex, we set In targeting adiverse group ofSOGIE-identified interviews. weeks, ofwhichfive were chosen to conduct people were trained over thecourse ofthetwo interviews withSOGIEidentified youth. Seven trained onhow to identify, recruit and conduct protections. Thefield researchers were also the study methodology andhuman participant two weeks oftraining onSOGIErelated issues, referred to as‘field researchers’). They conducted partner SOGIEfocused organisations (henceforth Bangkok andChiangMaibasedworkers from the Light Foundation, educated andtrained the local collaboration with team members from Urban Dr Meredith DankandMrJarrett Davis, in goals. use aqualitative approach to address the study’s New York City. who have sex withmenengaged insurvival sex in the experiences ofLGBTQ+ youth andyoung men project, DrMeredith Dank,whichdocumented study conducted by theleadinvestigator onthis goods. Themethodology isbasedonapast who exchange sex for money and/or material of adiverse group ofSOGIEidentifying youth to fullyexplore andunderstand theexperiences In-depth, peer-to-peer interviews were needed participants. the comfort andlikely engagement ofthe quality ofinterviews, itisbalancedby improving this approach hadtheriskofimpacting than might occurwithtrained researchers. While facilitate better engagement withtheparticipants lived experiences asparticipants were made to Efforts to identify frontline staff whohadsimilar organisations were financially compensated). Sky Association ofThailandinBangkok (and and V-Power inChiangMai,andfrom Rainbow CAREMAT, UrbanLight Foundation Thailand SOGIE advocates/staff were seconded from specialise inworking withSOGIEpopulations. partnerships withlocal organisations that This activity was alsodelivered through people Interviews withSOGIE-identified young 8 Given thesmallsamplesize, we
13 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 14 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report assistance inspecialincident reports. all efforts to provide appropriate referrals or were notinterviewed. Researchers documented negative impactonmental healthor well-being, ineligible for other reasons, includingperceived organisations provided. Thosewho were deemed agencies andmadeaware those oftheservices were given referrals to youth-oriented service sex were deemedineligiblefor theinterview but criteria; orwhowere notengaged inexchanging of thesamegender); were too oldfor ourage heterosexual butexchanged sex withthose asSOGIE(or Those whodidnotidentify might berequired. and any otherreferrals orinterventions that appropriateness for recruitment into thestudy agency, subjectswere rescreened for eligibility, researchers were employed. Uponarrival at the were conducted at theagencies where thefield field researchers. Almost alloftheinterviews so, to passalongthecontact information ofthe be interested inparticipating inthe study, andif were asked ifthey knew ofanyone whowould wanted to participate. Additionally, thoseclients they knew fitthe study criteria andasked ifthey clients oftheirrespective organisations who Field researchers approached current andformer future. recruited can beconducted in Thailandinthe conducted inNYC where 283young peoplewere hope isthat afull-scale study similarto theone the sampleofjust 20youth was small.The youth engaged inexchanging sex inThailand, could work to recruit diverse SOGIEidentified objectives was to determine ifthismethodology Since thisisanexploratory study, and oneofthe them continuing to dosonow as young adults. well asthecircumstances that may have ledto experiences ofexchanging sex aschildren, as to askolderyouth aboutpossibleprevious was extended upto 24years asitallowed us child sexual exploitation thesampleage range the focus oftheresearch was to understand to someform While ofsocialsupportservices. participants needed to be already connected goods inChiangMaiandBangkok. Additionally, the exchange ofsex for money and/or material members ofthesamesex); andinvolvement in (or asheterosexual butengaged insex with age of15–24years old, identification asSOGIE responses doesn’talways addupto 20. themes that were quantified, thenumberof interview. Asaresult, for thosecategories and protocol were not consistently asked inevery important note: thequestions intheinterview emerging themesversus outlyingexperiences. An the interview questions. Thishelped to identify young peoplewhoresponded acertain way to possible, researchers quantified thenumberof identified forinclusioninthis report.Where of themessorelevant quotes could beeasily Word; and individuallyusingMicrosoft Excel and Qualitative data were examined thoroughly provided by therespondent was helpful. the interview inthesamplesinceinformation with theteam, andultimately decided to include inclusion criteria. We were ableto discussthis is two years older thanwhat isstated inthe interviewed inMarch was 26years ofage, which researchers learnedthat oneoftherespondents valuable feedback to theteam. For example, had beencompleted pre-shut down andprovide the research team to review theinterviews that this caused asignificant disruption, itdidallow was notcompleted until June2020. Even though begun inmid-March before the shutdown, it COVID-19. Althoughdata collection hadalready movement andnon-essential gatherings due to trained, theThaiGovernment heavily restricted a couple ofweeks after thefield researchers were approximately onemonth to complete. However, Data collection was initially expected to take length. which ranged from 30minutes to over anhourin qualitative data from thetranscribed interviews, Researchers extracted asizable amount of agencies, toand service befullydocumented. including theirinteractions withlaw enforcement of theyouths’ experiences inexchanging sex, analysis), whichallowed detailed descriptions later transcribed (andtranslated to Englishfor were conducted inThai,audio-recorded and and they could stop at any time).Allinterviews theinterview(e.g. was confidential, anonymous, covered what theirrights were asaparticipant obtained theirinformed assent/consent, which recruited andinterviewed after the researchers and appropriate for thestudy were subsequently Youth whowere rescreened anddeemedeligible q uotations were codified into aseries Mahidol University. Institute ofHumanRights and Peace Studies at assembled to ethically review theproject viathe to andapproved by apanelofthree experts 9 Exploitation involving Children, ECPAT Guidelinesfor Ethical Research onSexual circumstances andisstrongly guidedby the includes numerous mitigations forthese For these reason acareful methodology that to thesexual abuseandexploitation ofchildren. affected by ‘vicarious traumatisation’ when exposed triggered strong emotions.They may alsohave been or abuse-andsomeofthequestions may have at sometime experienced various forms ofneglect that thesamplewould includestaff, whomay have the frontline providers service survey, asitwas likely or exploitation. Risks also related to participants in experienced discrimination andchildsexual abuse who were targeted for interviews were likely to have SOGIE identified youthengaged in exchanging sex knowledge andanecdotal accounts indicate that the this research project very sensitive. The existing of boys andtheinvolvement ofSOGIEyouth made In particular, the topic ofthesexual exploitation ethically sensitive research approach. the research team andwiththeapplication ofan study hadclearlydefined ethical guidelinesset by should besubjectto strict ethical standards. This research onchildsexual abuseandexploitation Given theinherent vulnerability ofchildren, Ethical Approval andConsiderations Prosecutor for confirmation. peer-reviewed by ahighlyrespected ThaiPublic comprehensiveness. Thedraft oftheanalysis was the development oftheanalysis andensure its including over 120points was created to support Global Boys’ Initiative. Inparticular, achecklist will befurtherusedinothercountries underthe tools developed by ECPAT International, which analysis was conducted utilisingamethod and of children, withaspecific focus onboys. The addressing thesexual abuseandexploitation a documentary analysis ofthelegal framework staff from ThailandInstitute ofJustice to conduct ECPAT International worked inpartnership with Analysis oflegislation International. ECPATInternational. December). (2019, 9 was proposed
Guidelines forethicalGuidelines researchsexual exploitationon involving children. the respondents’ namesare notmentioned. above, inorder to protect interviewee anonymity, used to write aresearch report. Asmentioned were informed that theirresponses would be Participants to bothprimary research activities reason. time, feel uncomfortable, upset, or for any other not to continue withtheinterview ifthey, at any sensitive innature andthat they are encouraged that theinterviews may cover topics that are beginning interviews, they were alsoinformed and for any reason, withoutrecourse. Priorto could withdraw from thestudy at any time participants were informed clearlythat they Team. Nowithdrawals were requested. The by contacting ECPAT International’s Research input process butalsopriorto thedata analysis free to dosobothat any timeduringthedata wished to withdraw from thestudy, they were any participant to thefrontline providers’ survey of thestudy andassent/consent was obtained. If participants were informed aboutthepurpose Before conducting interviews, allinvolved would berecommended infuture. so withinthelast month. Alonger recall period workdid boys with infrequently,not done had but Some excluded participants reported that they accurate recall, thiswas afairly shortperiod. period was deliberately chosento facilitate more Furthermore, whilethe‘one month’ recall been impacted. Thisisexplained intheanalysis. impacts. Nevertheless, thisdata may still have this question recalling amonth prior to COVID-19 administrators instructed participants to answer time ofmovement restrictions. However, the which for many respondents includedduringthe recall theircaseloads “during thelast month” survey, somequestions asked participants to couple ofways. Withinthefrontline providers’ possibility that data was perhaps influenced ina accommodations however there remains the methodology was maintained withminor collection was able to proceed. Ourplanned phase, however after these were relaxed, data COVID-19 delayed theplanneddata collection Movement restrictions asa response to Limitations
Bangkok:ECPAT
15 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report 16 Global Boys Initiative to Explore the Sexual Exploitation of Boys: Thailand Report goods. who exchange sex for money andothermaterial in recruiting more youth undertheage of18 Respondent Driven Samplingcould besuccessful larger samplesize that usesamethodology like adulthood. However, afuture study witha experiences exchanging sex oncethey reach are more comfortable speakingabouttheir 10 Past research were interviewed were over theage of18. Additionally, themajorityof young peoplewho in future research withalarger samplesize. emerging themesthat can befurtherexplored the findingsinthat chapter shouldbetreated as SOGIE identified youthwho exchange sex. Thus, findings to thebroader population ofdiverse limited theresearchers’ abilityto generalise the identified youngpeople wassmall(n=20),which The samplesize for theinterviews withSOGIE- communities. wider andmore nuancedissueswithintheir own on globalindicators ofrisk,andnotevidence of on theirwork, from alist ofsuggestions based providers’ ‘perceptions based ofvulnerability’ This research explored frontline service YWSW Engaged inSurvival Sex. Curtis, et al. (2006).; 10 hasshown that young people Dank, M.
et al.
Urban Institute. (2015, February).
Surviving Surviving the Streets of New York. Experiences of LGTBQ Youth, YMSM, and born andraised inThailand. experiences andneedsmight differ from those Thai nationals inorder to document how their sex shouldmake allattempts to includenon- Future research onSOGIEyouth whoexchange work are more likely to beThainationals. atservices theNGOswhere thefield researchers experiences. Or, that theclients that access are afraid to come forward to talk abouttheir youth whoexchange sex are lesscomfortable or This could bebecause foreign national SOGIE that alloftherespondents were Thainationals. Another limitation oftheSOGIEinterviews was identify as ‘other’. In Pattaya, among25service male (45%)orfemale (45%), andtwo (9%) providers inChiangMai, 90%identify aseither either transgender or‘other’. Among22service 17% identify as female, and44% identify as providers,the 18service 39%identify asmale, as Transgender or‘other’. InBangkok, among female, 19(29%)are male,and17(26%)identify providersNearly half(29or45%)ofservice are Gender three areas. fitting theinclusioncriteriasurvey forthe inthese to beathorough providers samplingofservice Considering this,field researchers believe this providersservice having noactive male cases. attempted, butmany were disqualified due to exploitation. Onehundred and ten surveys were an active caseload ofmalevictims sexual a very limited numberofsocialworkers with sample, field researchers explain that there is (18 or28%).Whilethisisnotastatistically large or 38%),ChiangMai(2228%),andBangkok taken inthree Thaiurbancentres: Pattaya (25 Respondents come from similarlysized samples Location SAMPLE DEMOGRAPHICS SUPPORTING BOYS SURVEY OF FRONTLINE WORKERS