Ride the Wave Transit Guide, March 2019
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Seattle Seattlelake
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 map continues on page 8 map continues on page 5 527 North KingCo. / SNOHOMISH COUNTY E N 952 NE Ave 120th Seattle Ave NE Ave d 100th 104th Ave NE Ave KING COUNTY B 306 Bothell 424 a o Page 8 o t 405 R h Woodinville-Snohomish Rd NE e y E ll e l N W NE 195th l a NE 195th St e y a Lake v 88th Ave NE Ave 88th V East King County N A St d A E e t R i s e 1 522 931 m Cascadia CC/ 372 k l 6 156th Ave NE Forest a a 306 532 L u 80th Ave NE80th Ave 931 UW Bothell 5th St 931 NE Woodinville-Duvall Rd q NE 18 522 NE Woodinville-Duvall Rd e 309 o 952 s 306 522 105 312 i n Park NE 68thAve Kenmore d S 312 931 a t 522 r 535 106 372 s 331 a e 238 931 Wood 522 Woodinville P 342 Bothell in 237 W 522 B vi 202 Cottage Lake Park 342 r lle Woodinville 372 E Riv R i 311 232 ers c D NE 175th St o Swamp N id k r Cottage Kenmore E B 312 e 238 a y 372 alley R o d a 236 NE 171st St V d th r Lake Duvall-Monroey Rd NE E Creek 522 D d r N 234 ell y 342 r 424 r y Wa 202 236 e W Park 372 Blyth h ll 244 237 342 W 212th C 1 NE Ave NE e 236 o 4 Snohomish County th 935 Park 311 952 o 0 NE 165th St o 238 d t B i h Page 4 n B vi P Simonds Road NE W ll l 224 Duvall e NE 160th St N Gold NE Ave 3rd a 232 E W R y E 232 e Creek N y n d 931 Mink Rd NE t NE 155th St i N t m S 158th 224 a Brickyard Park o Ave NE McCormick E n n i Taylor 236 255 a d J l Park u e NE 150th St 234 l R P M Park a il 257 257 n v 532 d h 244 n t it i a d 6 NE Ave 216th 535 NEAve 124th 4 D o NE 145th St E 1 E N r o i N 935 v W Bus Routes by Agency y NE 144th St NE e 237 236 a a N t -
SDP 13-00003 Project: Issaquah Highlands Site Development Permit - Blocks 25-27 (Discovery West)
CITY OF ISSAQUAH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT URBAN VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION STAFF REPORT October 8, 2013 File No.: SDP 13-00003 Project: Issaquah Highlands Site Development Permit - Blocks 25-27 (Discovery West) Table of Contents I. Application Information ..................................................................................................................... 2 II. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Proposed Action ............................................................................................................. 4 Permit History ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Approval Criteria ................................................................................................................................ 6 Public Notice ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Proposal Modification ........................................................................................................................ 7 III. Development Standards and Regulations ........................................................................................ -
Matrix of Public Comments Received and Reponses Provided
MATRIX OF PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSES PROVIDED Eglinton Crosstown LRT Project Detailed Comments and Responses from April 25, 2008 – February 22, 2010 The following table lists comments and / or questions received from members of the public in reference to the Eglinton Crosstown LRT line, from the project’s inception (beginning April 25, 2008) and continuing through to February 22, 2010. These detailed comments were received through various outlets including telephone conversations, email correspondence, fax or letter. Once a comment or question was received, a response was generated by the appropriate project team member and sent out by either the Public Consultation Unit at the City of Toronto, LURA Consulting or the TTC (refer to “Response” column). During the noted timeframe, a total of 584 comments were received and responded to. Each email or phone call was identified by an ID number, linking it to any attachments that might have accompanied the correspondence. In addition, each comment (email, phone call, fax or letter) had the potential to include numerous issues, concerns or question s. Please refer to the “Subject” Column for a summary of the more detailed communication listed in the “Comment / Question” column. Total number of people only requresting to be placed on the mailing list: 54 ID # Date Source Subject Response Date out 203 25-Apr-08 Email Support for better Transit. Sent by Councillor’s office. No details provided therefore no response. N/A Comment: Lives near Trethewey and Eglinton and have to put up with traffic congestion, heavy gas emissions and noise. This area needs to improve. -
Appendix C Existing and Future Transit Routes and Level of Service
Appendix C Existing and Future Transit Routes and Level of Service Appendix C Existing and Future Transit Routes and Level of Service TABLE C-1 Existing, No-Build, and Build Transit Routes in East Link Study Area Stop Locations in Stop Locations Stop Location in Project Area in Study Area Service Area Study Area Route No. (Existing) Service Area (Existing) (No Build) (No Build) (Build) Service Area (Build) KCM 111 I-90 Downtown Seattle, I-90 & Rainier, Newport Hills Same as Existing Same as Existing I-90, South - Downtown Seattle, I-90 P&R, Kennydale, Renton Highlands P&R, Renton Bellevue, and Rainier Highlands, Maplewood Heights, Lake Kathleen Bellevue + South Bellevue, Bellevue KCM 114 I-90 Downtown Seattle, I-90 & Rainier, Newport Hills Same as Existing Same as Existing I-90, South - Downtown Seattle, I-90 P&R, Kennydale, Renton Highlands P&R, Renton Bellevue, and Rainier Highlands, Maplewood Heights, Lake Kathleen Bellevue + South Bellevue, Bellevue, Lake Kathleen KCM 202 North Mercer Island Downtown Seattle, North Mercer Island, South Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Mercer Island KCM 205 North Mercer Island University District, Montlake, First Hill Seattle, North Deleted Deleted Deleted Deleted Mercer Island, South Mercer Island KCM 210 I-90 & Rainier Avenue Downtown Seattle, I-90 & Rainier, Factoria, Same as Existing Same as Existing South Bellevue - Downtown Seattle, I-90 Eastgate, Issaquah Transfer Point and Rainier + South Bellevue KCM 212 I-90 & Rainier Avenue, Downtown Seattle, I-90 & Rainier, Factoria, Same as Existing Same -
Sound Transit Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report
Transit Development Plan 2013-2018 and 2012 Annual Report Public Hearing Held: July 11, 2013 Operations and Administration Committee Referral to Board: July 18, 2013 Board of Directors Approval for Submittal: July 25, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................2 I: ORGANIZATION .....................................................................................................................2 II: PHYSICAL PLANT ................................................................................................................5 III: SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS ...........................................................................................6 IV: SERVICE CONNECTIONS ................................................................................................. 10 V: ACTIVITIES IN 2012 ............................................................................................................ 12 VI: PLANNED ACTION STRATEGIES, 2012 – 2018 .............................................................. 19 VII: PLANNED ACTIVITIES, 2012 – 2018 ............................................................................... 20 VIII: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, 2012 – 2018 ..................................................... 23 IX: OPERATING DATA, 2012 – 2018 ...................................................................................... 23 X: ANNUAL REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES, 2012 – 2018 ............................................. -
Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface
01 Canada Rail Opportunities Canada Rail Opportunities Scoping Report Preface Acknowledgements Photo and image credits The authors would like to thank the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport following organisations for their help and British Columbia Ministry of Transportation support in the creation of this publication: and Infrastructure Agence Métropolitaine de Transport BC Transit Alberta Ministry of Transport Calgary Transit Alberta High Speed Rail City of Brampton ARUP City of Hamilton Balfour Beatty City of Mississauga Bombardier City of Ottawa Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit Canadian National Railway Helen Hemmingsen, UKTI Toronto Canadian Urban Transit Association Metrolinx Edmonton Transit OC Transpo GO Transit Sasha Musij, UKTI Calgary Metrolinx Société de Transport de Montréal RailTerm TransLink SNC Lavalin Toronto Transit Commission Toronto Transit Commission Wikimedia Commons Wikipedia Front cover image: SkyTrain in Richmond, Vancouver Canada Rail Opportunities Contents Preface Foreword 09 About UK Trade & Investment 10 High Value Opportunities Programme 11 Executive Summary 12 1.0 Introduction 14 2.0 Background on Canada 15 2.1 Macro Economic Review 16 2.2 Public-Private Partnerships 18 3.0 Overview of the Canadian Rail Sector 20 4.0 Review of Urban Transit Operations and Opportunities by Province 21 4.1 Summary Table of Existing Urban Transit Rail Infrastructure and Operations 22 4.2 Summary Table of Key Project Opportunities 24 4.3 Ontario 26 4.4 Québec 33 4.5 Alberta 37 4.6 British Columbia 41 5.0 In-Market suppliers 45 5.1 Contractors 45 5.2 Systems and Rolling Stock 48 5.3 Consultants 49 6.0 Concluding Remarks 51 7.0 Annexes 52 7.1 Doing Business in Canada 52 7.2 Abbreviations 53 7.3 Bibliography 54 7.4 List of Reference Websites 56 7.5 How can UKTI Help UK Organisations Succeed in Canada 58 Contact UKTI 59 04 Canada Rail Opportunities About the Authors David Bill Helen Hemmingsen David is the International Helen Hemmingsen is a Trade Officer Development Director for the UK with the British Consulate General Railway Industry Association (RIA). -
Transit Now Rapidly Developing Areas
TRANSIT NOW RAPIDLY DEVELOPING AREAS Areas Assessment and Program Priorities King County Metro Transit Service Planning Group January 2008 Transit Now Rapidly Developing Areas EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Purpose and Objectives The purpose of this report is to define eligible areas and identify potential improvements related to the Rapidly Developing Areas component of the Transit Now program. The specific objectives of this report are as follows: 1) Provide an assessment of Rapidly Developing Areas identified in the Transit Now Ordinance #15582, adopted September 6, 2006. 2) Identify and assess additional areas proposed for inclusion in the Rapidly Developing Areas program, and 3) Identify potential service improvements to address service deficiencies in the areas identified in 1) and 2). The program of improvements described in this report should be regarded as preliminary in nature. The program will be subject to modification based on input received from area stakeholders and the public (see Implementation Process section below). Outline This Executive Summary includes a brief program description and a discussion of general issues that should be considered as the program further develops. Next, potential service investments are listed by area and the potential year of implementation. A set of two maps depicting the Rapidly Developing Areas and the potential set of improvements is also provided. The areas assessment follows the Executive Summary and for each area includes a brief overview of the area, a description of current service, deficiencies in the existing service and improvements intended to address identified deficiencies. Program Description The stated objective of the Rapidly Developing Areas component of the Transit Now Program is as follows: Increase service to growing residential areas within the Urban Growth Area and implement Strategy S-7 of the 2007-2016 Strategic Plan for Public Transportation by adding peak service in areas not currently served and offering expanded midday service in some areas that currently have peak service only. -
Union Pearson Express
UP EXPRESS FAQ The Union Pearson Express (UP Express) is a dedicated air rail link service that connects Toronto Pearson International Airport to Union Station in the heart of downtown in just 25 minutes. UP Express trains depart every 15 minutes, 19 ½ hours a day between 05:30 and 01:00. All UP Express Stations and trains are fully accessible. UP EXPRESS ROUTE UP EXPRESS 25 minutes Guests can board the Union Pearson Express trains from one of four stations: $27.50 1. Union 2. Weston 3. Bloor 4. Pearson LIMO 45 –60 minutes ~$70 TAXI 45 –60 minutes ~$60 For complete information on any of the information on this sheet, please visit our website at www.upexpress.com or contact us at 1.844.GET.ON.UP (1.844.387.3652). STATION LOCATIONS Each UP Express station is conveniently located so that it can be reached by car and through major transit connections. GO 45 –60 minutes UP Express Stations Locations ~$8 In the Skywalk at Union Station in downtown Toronto between Union York Street and Simcoe Street. On Bloor Street West just east of the intersection of Bloor Street West and Dundas Street West (East of Dundas West TTC Weston subway station ~5mins walk) and shared with the Bloor GO TTC 60 –75+ minutes Transit Station. ~$3 Just east of Weston Road near Lawrence Avenue West and Bloor shared with the Weston GO Transit station. Located beside the Link Train at Terminal 1, the service that Pearson connects travellers to Terminal 3. HOURS OF OPERATION Each trip from Union to Pearson station takes 25 minutes and includes brief stops at Bloor and Weston GO Stations. -
Terminal 1 Arrivals Directions to up Express Pearson Station Follow the Train to City Icon to Get to Our Station
Terminal 1 Arrivals Directions to UP Express Pearson Station Follow the Train to City icon to get to our station Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Exiting baggage claim, locate the Union Pearson Take the escalator next to the UP Express service Enter the walkway leading to the parking garage Express service counter in Terminal 1, adjacent to counter to the second floor, and turn right. and stay to the left. the international arrivals hall. Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Turn left at the end of the walkway (before entering Ascend the escalator. Walk past the Terminal Link Train to the UP Express the garage), and follow the signs for ‘Train to City’. Station at the end of the platform. Terminal 3 Arrivals Directions to UP Express Pearson Station Follow the Train to City icon to get to our station Option 1: Elevator Option 2: Escalator Step 2 Follow the train icon above and ‘Train to City’ Or, if you prefer, take the escalator located near Walk towards the end of the hall. signage. Take the elevator, near door ‘D’, to door ‘F’. Keep to your right and you’ll come to a level 3. second set of escalators that will take you to level 3. Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Either take the elevator to the left, or the escalator Take the free blue Terminal Link train to ‘Terminal 1 Once you arrive at Terminal 1, the UP Express to the right, to reach the Terminal Link train and the UP Express Station’. platform can be found at the end of the hall. -
Directions to Union Person Express Station V5
Directions to Union Pearson Express Stations UP Express Pearson Station – Toronto Pearson International Airport From UP Express to Terminal 1 Departures Upon arriving at UP Express Pearson Station walk straight past the Terminal Link train platform (blue train) to the escalators/ elevators down. Follow the signage past the parking garage and through the pedestrian bridge to Terminal 1. Flight check-in desks are located on the Departures level (upper level). From UP Express to Terminal 3 Departures Upon arriving at UP Express Pearson Station, exit the UP Express area and wait for the blue Terminal Link train on the platform located immediately before the escalators. The Terminal Link train is a free service and operates 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, and the travel time to Terminal 3 is about 3 minutes. Exit the Terminal Link train at the first stop and take the escalator down to the pedestrian bridge to Terminal 3. Then, past the bridge, take the next escalator down to the Departures level. From Terminal 1 Arrivals to UP Express Upon exiting the baggage hall, follow the signage “Train to City” and “Trains” - look for the train icon pictured above. Please note there is an UP Express service counter adjacent to the International Arrivals hall for information or ticket sales. From the Arrivals level, take the escalator up to the mezzanine level (level 2) and cross the pedestrian bridge to the parking garage. As you enter the parking garage, make a sharp le turn into the train station and take the escalator up to the train station. -
Downtown Bellevue Bus Guide Tips for Your Commute
Downtown Bellevue Bus Guide Tips for Your Commute BELLEVUE TRANSIT CENTER: The Bellevue Transit Center is the largest transit hub in the City of Bellevue. If you use transit on your commute, the Bellevue Transit Center is a great resource. The Bellevue Transit Center is located at 10850 NE 6th St, Bellevue, WA 98004 PARK & RIDE: Park & Ride locations are large lots that help connect remote locations to transit hubs. Turn to the other side of this sheet for some Park & Ride locations in your neighborhood. ORCA CARDS: ORCA cards allow you to hop on the bus and pay with a simple swipe – you can set up an online account. Load funds onto your card manually or set up automatic payments whenever funds are low. Another perk for ORCA users includes reduced rates for transferring from a Sound Transit (ST) bus to a King County Metro (Metro) bus and vice versa. FARES: Your bus fare depends on a few different factors: (1) Did you transfer busses? (2) Did you travel within 1 zone or 2 zones? (3) Did you travel during peak hours? (4) Which transit provider did you use? o Sound Transit: One-County Fare – $2.75 | Multi-County Fare – $3.75 o King County Metro: Off-Peak – $2.50 | One-Zone Peak – $2.75 | Two-zone Peak – $3.25 Free Mobile Apps & Websites for Commute Planning: ONE BUS AWAY Download the app for iPhone, Android and Windows phones to access up-to-date bus arrival times so you aren’t running or waiting for the next Metro or Sound Transit bus. -
24 3.5 Chronology of the Air Rail Link Project in 2001, Transport Canada
3.5 Chronology of the Air Rail Link Project In 2001, Transport Canada issued a request for Expression of Interest from the private sector to finance, design, build, operate, and maintain passenger rail service between Union Station and Pearson Airport. Four firms were pre-qualified and submitted business cases in 2003. Union Pearson AirLink Group (UPAG), owned by SNC Lavalin Engineers & Constructors, was awarded the contract that same year (Transport Canada, 2007). They decided to call the project the Blue22 after the estimated length in minutes of the trip (Figure 3.4). Figure 3.4: Initial Blue22 Route Plan Source: Transport Canada, 2007 In May 2004, the Government of Canada, Province of Ontario, and GO Transit entered into a funding agreement for upgrades to the GO network in the GTA. This included the GO’s Georgetown Corridor and the Union Station GO Corridor, which would be used by the Blue22 on its trip to Pearson. For the next few years planning, negotiations, and an environmental assessment were undertaken (Transport Canada, 2007). Concurrently, the Province was developing the MoveOntario 2020 plan and The 24 Big Move respectively. Both of these plans included this connection as a way to relieve congestion and provide more public transit options. Negotiations with the private partner, SNC Lavalin, fell through in July 2010. In a press release surrounding the negotiations, SNC Lavalin said, Given the state of financial markets over the past few years, lenders in both Canada and elsewhere are reluctant to lend money for full revenue- risk projects. As a result an agreement that met our standards of risk tolerance could not be reached with interested lenders (SNC Lavalin, 2010).