Picoplankton Distribution and Activity in the Deep Waters of the Southern Adriatic Sea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks Bioblitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event
National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 ON THIS PAGE Photograph of BioBlitz participants conducting data entry into iNaturalist. Photograph courtesy of the National Park Service. ON THE COVER Photograph of BioBlitz participants collecting aquatic species data in the Presidio of San Francisco. Photograph courtesy of National Park Service. The 2014 Golden Gate National Parks BioBlitz - Data Management and the Event Species List Achieving a Quality Dataset from a Large Scale Event Natural Resource Report NPS/GOGA/NRR—2016/1147 Elizabeth Edson1, Michelle O’Herron1, Alison Forrestel2, Daniel George3 1Golden Gate Parks Conservancy Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94129 2National Park Service. Golden Gate National Recreation Area Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1061 Sausalito, CA 94965 3National Park Service. San Francisco Bay Area Network Inventory & Monitoring Program Manager Fort Cronkhite, Bldg. 1063 Sausalito, CA 94965 March 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. -
Anoxygenic Photosynthesis in Photolithotrophic Sulfur Bacteria and Their Role in Detoxication of Hydrogen Sulfide
antioxidants Review Anoxygenic Photosynthesis in Photolithotrophic Sulfur Bacteria and Their Role in Detoxication of Hydrogen Sulfide Ivan Kushkevych 1,* , Veronika Bosáková 1,2 , Monika Vítˇezová 1 and Simon K.-M. R. Rittmann 3,* 1 Department of Experimental Biology, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic; [email protected] (V.B.); [email protected] (M.V.) 2 Department of Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic 3 Archaea Physiology & Biotechnology Group, Department of Functional and Evolutionary Ecology, Universität Wien, 1090 Vienna, Austria * Correspondence: [email protected] (I.K.); [email protected] (S.K.-M.R.R.); Tel.: +420-549-495-315 (I.K.); +431-427-776-513 (S.K.-M.R.R.) Abstract: Hydrogen sulfide is a toxic compound that can affect various groups of water microorgan- isms. Photolithotrophic sulfur bacteria including Chromatiaceae and Chlorobiaceae are able to convert inorganic substrate (hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide) into organic matter deriving energy from photosynthesis. This process takes place in the absence of molecular oxygen and is referred to as anoxygenic photosynthesis, in which exogenous electron donors are needed. These donors may be reduced sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide. This paper deals with the description of this metabolic process, representatives of the above-mentioned families, and discusses the possibility using anoxygenic phototrophic microorganisms for the detoxification of toxic hydrogen sulfide. Moreover, their general characteristics, morphology, metabolism, and taxonomy are described as Citation: Kushkevych, I.; Bosáková, well as the conditions for isolation and cultivation of these microorganisms will be presented. V.; Vítˇezová,M.; Rittmann, S.K.-M.R. -
Coming-Of-Age Characterization of Soil Viruses: a User's Guide To
Review Coming-of-Age Characterization of Soil Viruses: A User’s Guide to Virus Isolation, Detection within Metagenomes, and Viromics Gareth Trubl 1,* , Paul Hyman 2 , Simon Roux 3 and Stephen T. Abedon 4,* 1 Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, USA 2 Department of Biology/Toxicology, Ashland University, Ashland, OH 44805, USA; [email protected] 3 DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; [email protected] 4 Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Mansfield, OH 44906, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (S.T.A.) Received: 25 February 2020; Accepted: 17 April 2020; Published: 21 April 2020 Abstract: The study of soil viruses, though not new, has languished relative to the study of marine viruses. This is particularly due to challenges associated with separating virions from harboring soils. Generally, three approaches to analyzing soil viruses have been employed: (1) Isolation, to characterize virus genotypes and phenotypes, the primary method used prior to the start of the 21st century. (2) Metagenomics, which has revealed a vast diversity of viruses while also allowing insights into viral community ecology, although with limitations due to DNA from cellular organisms obscuring viral DNA. (3) Viromics (targeted metagenomics of virus-like-particles), which has provided a more focused development of ‘virus-sequence-to-ecology’ pipelines, a result of separation of presumptive virions from cellular organisms prior to DNA extraction. This separation permits greater sequencing emphasis on virus DNA and thereby more targeted molecular and ecological characterization of viruses. -
Myoglobin with Modified Tetrapyrrole Chromophores: Binding Specificity and Photochemistry ⁎ Stephanie Pröll A, Brigitte Wilhelm A, Bruno Robert B, Hugo Scheer A
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1757 (2006) 750–763 www.elsevier.com/locate/bbabio Myoglobin with modified tetrapyrrole chromophores: Binding specificity and photochemistry ⁎ Stephanie Pröll a, Brigitte Wilhelm a, Bruno Robert b, Hugo Scheer a, a Department Biologie I-Botanik, Universität München, Menzingerstr, 67, 80638 München, Germany b Sections de Biophysique des Protéines et des Membranes, DBCM/CEA et URA CNRS 2096, C.E. Saclay, 91191 Gif (Yvette), France Received 2 August 2005; received in revised form 2 March 2006; accepted 28 March 2006 Available online 12 May 2006 Abstract Complexes were prepared of horse heart myoglobin with derivatives of (bacterio)chlorophylls and the linear tetrapyrrole, phycocyanobilin. Structural factors important for binding are (i) the presence of a central metal with open ligation site, which even induces binding of phycocyanobilin, and (ii) the absence of the hydrophobic esterifying alcohol, phytol. Binding is further modulated by the stereochemistry at the isocyclic ring. The binding pocket can act as a reaction chamber: with enolizable substrates, apo-myoglobin acts as a 132-epimerase converting, e.g., Zn-pheophorbide a' (132S) to a (132R). Light-induced reduction and oxidation of the bound pigments are accelerated as compared to solution. Some flexibility of the myoglobin is required for these reactions to occur; a nucleophile is required near the chromophores for photoreduction (Krasnovskii reaction), and oxygen for photooxidation. Oxidation of the bacteriochlorin in the complex and in aqueous solution continues in the dark. © 2006 Elsevier B.V. -
Does a Latitudinal Gradient Exist?
Notes 1813 Limnol. Oceatzogr., 38(8). 1993, 1813-1818 (0 1993, by the Ameruzan Society of Limnology and Oceanography. Inc Chlorophyll a concentrations in the North Pacific: Does a latitudinal gradient exist? Abstract -Chlorophyll a concentrations were tion properties of glass-fiber and membrane measured as a function of depth from 28 to 48”N filters have demonstrated that glass-fiber filters along 152”W in March 199 1 with Whatman GF/F and 0.2~pm Nuclepore filters. Surface Chl a concen- inadequately retain < 1-pm-diameter cells due trations measured with 0.2~ym Nuclepore filters were to their large nominal pore size (0.7 and 1.2 up to fourfold higher than those measured with pm for Whatman GF/F and GF/C filters). Low Whatman GF/F filters. The largest difference be- retention efficiencies of glass-fiber filters result tween the two filter types was found in subtropical waters, where picoplankton were a major constituent when Chl a concentrations are low (<0.5-l .O of the phytoplankton assemblage. Chl a concentra- pg Chl a liter-‘) and when picoplankton are a tions integrated from 0 to 175 m showed a threefold dominant fraction of the phytoplankton as- increase (9-26 mg Chl a m-I) between 28 and 48”N semblage (Phinney and Yentsch 1985; Taguchi when Whatman GF/F filters were used. However, integrated Chl a concentrations based on measure- and Laws 1988). Under such conditions the ments with 0.2~pm Nuclepore filters were nearly con- use of membrane filters with submicron pore stant (25-3 1 mg Chl a mpZ) over the transect. -
Characteristic Microbiomes Correlate with Polyphosphate Accumulation of Marine Sponges in South China Sea Areas
microorganisms Article Characteristic Microbiomes Correlate with Polyphosphate Accumulation of Marine Sponges in South China Sea Areas 1 1, 1 1 2, 1,3, Huilong Ou , Mingyu Li y, Shufei Wu , Linli Jia , Russell T. Hill * and Jing Zhao * 1 College of Ocean and Earth Science of Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China; [email protected] (H.O.); [email protected] (M.L.); [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (L.J.) 2 Institute of Marine and Environmental Technology, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA 3 Xiamen City Key Laboratory of Urban Sea Ecological Conservation and Restoration (USER), Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (R.T.H.); Tel.: +86-592-288-0811 (J.Z.); Tel.: +(410)-234-8802 (R.T.H.) The author contributed equally to the work as co-first author. y Received: 24 September 2019; Accepted: 25 December 2019; Published: 30 December 2019 Abstract: Some sponges have been shown to accumulate abundant phosphorus in the form of polyphosphate (polyP) granules even in waters where phosphorus is present at low concentrations. But the polyP accumulation occurring in sponges and their symbiotic bacteria have been little studied. The amounts of polyP exhibited significant differences in twelve sponges from marine environments with high or low dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) concentrations which were quantified by spectral analysis, even though in the same sponge genus, e.g., Mycale sp. or Callyspongia sp. PolyP enrichment rates of sponges in oligotrophic environments were far higher than those in eutrophic environments. -
Marine Microplankton Ecology Reading
Marine Microplankton Ecology Reading Microbes dominate our planet, especially the Earth’s oceans. The distinguishing feature of microorganisms is their small size, usually defined as less than 200 micrometers (µm); they are all invisible to the naked eye. As a group, sea microbes are extremely diverse, and extremely versatile with respect to their abilities to make and eat food. All marine microbes are too small to swim against the current and are therefore classified as plankton. First we will discuss several ways to classify marine microbes. 1. Size Planktonic marine organisms can be divided into the following size categories: Category Size femtoplankton <0.2 µm picoplankton 0.2-2 µm nanoplankton 2-20 µm microplankton 20-200 µm mesoplankton 200-2000 µm In this laboratory we are concerned with the microscopic portion of the plankton, less than 200 µm. These organisms are not visible to the naked eye (Figure 1). Figure 1. Size classes of marine plankton 2. Type A. Viruses Viruses are the smallest and simplest microplankton. They range from 0.01 to 0.3 um in diameter. Externally, viruses have a capsid, or protein coat. Viruses can also have simple or complex external morphologies with tail fibers and structures that are used to inject DNA or RNA into their host. Viruses have little internal morphology. They do not have a nucleus or organelles. They do not have chlorophyll. Inside a virus there is only nucleic acid, either DNA or RNA. Viruses do not grow and have no metabolism. Marine viruses are highly abundant. There are up to 10 billion in one liter of seawater! B. -
Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun
OCEANOGRAPHY – Vol.II - Biological Oceanography - Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun BIOLOGICAL OCEANOGRAPHY Legendre, Louis and Rassoulzadegan, Fereidoun Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche, France. Keywords: Algae, allochthonous nutrient, aphotic zone, autochthonous nutrient, Auxotrophs, bacteria, bacterioplankton, benthos, carbon dioxide, carnivory, chelator, chemoautotrophs, ciliates, coastal eutrophication, coccolithophores, convection, crustaceans, cyanobacteria, detritus, diatoms, dinoflagellates, disphotic zone, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved organic matter (DOM), ecosystem, eukaryotes, euphotic zone, eutrophic, excretion, exoenzymes, exudation, fecal pellet, femtoplankton, fish, fish lavae, flagellates, food web, foraminifers, fungi, harmful algal blooms (HABs), herbivorous food web, herbivory, heterotrophs, holoplankton, ichthyoplankton, irradiance, labile, large planktonic microphages, lysis, macroplankton, marine snow, megaplankton, meroplankton, mesoplankton, metazoan, metazooplankton, microbial food web, microbial loop, microheterotrophs, microplankton, mixotrophs, mollusks, multivorous food web, mutualism, mycoplankton, nanoplankton, nekton, net community production (NCP), neuston, new production, nutrient limitation, nutrient (macro-, micro-, inorganic, organic), oligotrophic, omnivory, osmotrophs, particulate organic carbon (POC), particulate organic matter (POM), pelagic, phagocytosis, phagotrophs, photoautotorphs, photosynthesis, phytoplankton, phytoplankton bloom, picoplankton, plankton, -
Biofilm Forming Purple Sulfur Bacteria Enrichment from Trunk River
Different biofilm-forming purple sulfur bacteria enriched from Trunk River Xiaolei Liu Abstract Three different types of biofilm were developed on the bottles of purple sulfur bacteria enrichments. The original inoculum is a piece of sea grass covered with purple biofilm that collected from Trunk River during the course. Microscopy imaging showed that two of the three biofilms were apparently composed of two major species. MonoFISH probing supports the recognition of purple sulfur bacteria as Chromatium in the class of gammaproteobacteria which grow together with a deltaproteobacteria species. Such a combination of Chromatium colonize with deltaproteobacteria species is also originally present in the purple biofilm on sea grass. Further work is needed to investigate the potential interactions between these two species. Introduction Purple sulfur bacteria are photosynthetic anearobes in the phylum of Proteobacteria (Fowler et al., 1984), which is capable of fixing carbon dioxide with sulfide other than water as the electron donors. Since oxygen is not produced during their photosynthesis these purple sulfur bacteria are also known as anoxygenic photoautotrophs. Most purple sulfur bacteria synthesize bacteriochlorophyll and carotenoids as their light-harvesting pigment complex (Iba et al., 1988). Because their photosynthesis reQuires anoxic condition and sulfide, these purple sulfur bacteria are often found in organic rich aquatic environments where sulfate reducing heterotrophic bacteria thrive. Both planktonic and benthic species of purple sulfur bacteria exist in different sulfidic environments. In the habitat of stratified meromictic lakes with external sulfate input, such as Green Lake, Mahoney Lake and Lake Cadagno, the phototrophic chemocline microbial communities are often dominated by planktonic purple sulfur bacteria living on sulfide diffused up from organic rich sediment (e.g. -
Marine Microbiology at Scripps
81832_Ocean 8/28/03 7:18 PM Page 67 Special Issue—Scripps Centennial Marine Microbiology at Scripps A. Aristides Yayanos Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, • San Diego, California USA Marine microbiology is the study of the smallest isolated marine bioluminescent bacteria, isolated and organisms found in the oceans—bacteria and archaea, characterized sulfate-reducing bacteria, and showed many eukaryotes (among the protozoa, fungi, and denitrifying bacteria could both produce and consume plants), and viruses. Most microorganisms can be seen nitrous oxide, now known to be an important green- only with a microscope. Microbes pervade the oceans, house gas. Beijerinck also founded the field of virology its sediments, and some hydrothermal fluids and through his work on plant viruses (van Iterson et al., exhibit solitary life styles as well as complex relation- 1983). Mills (1989) describes the significance of the ships with animals, other microorganisms, and each work of Beijerink and Winogradsky to plankton other. The skeletal remains of microorganisms form the research and marine chemistry. largest component of sedimentary fossils whose study Around 1903, bacteriology in California was reveals Earth’s history. The enormous morphological, emerging in the areas of medicine and public health physiological, and taxonomic diversity of marine and accordingly was developing into an academic dis- microorganisms remains far from adequately cipline in medical schools (McClung and Meyer, 1974). described and studied. Because the sea receives terres- Whereas the branch of microbiology dealing with bac- trial microorganisms from rivers, sewage outfalls, and teria and viruses was just beginning, the branch con- other sources, marine microbiology also includes the cerning protozoa and algae was a relatively more estab- study of alien microorganisms. -
Present and Future Global Distributions of the Marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus
Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus Pedro Flombauma,b, José L. Gallegosa, Rodolfo A. Gordilloa, José Rincóna, Lina L. Zabalab, Nianzhi Jiaoc, David M. Karld,1, William K. W. Lie, Michael W. Lomasf, Daniele Venezianog, Carolina S. Verab, Jasper A. Vrugta,h, and Adam C. Martinya,i,1 Departments of aEarth System Science, hCivil Engineering, and iEcology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697; bCentro de Investigaciones del Mar y la Atmósfera, Departamento de Ciencias de la Atmósfera y los Océanos, and Instituto Franco Argentino sobre Estudios del Clima y sus Impactos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científica y Tecnológicas and Universidad de Buenos Aires, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina; cInstitute of Microbes and Ecosphere, State Key Lab for Marine Environmental Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China; dCenter for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education (C-MORE), University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822; eFisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS, Canada B2Y 4A2; fBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, East Boothbay, ME 04544; and gDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 Contributed by David M. Karl, April 25, 2013 (sent for review January 22, 2013) The Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus account for outcompeted by other phytoplankton in high-nutrient waters (12, a substantial fraction of marine primary production. Here, we pres- 13). Synechococcus does not extend as deep in the water column as ent quantitative niche models for these lineages that assess present Prochlorococcus, but it has a wider geographical distribution that and future global abundances and distributions. -
Table S5. the Information of the Bacteria Annotated in the Soil Community at Species Level
Table S5. The information of the bacteria annotated in the soil community at species level No. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species The number of contigs Abundance(%) 1 Firmicutes Bacilli Bacillales Bacillaceae Bacillus Bacillus cereus 1749 5.145782459 2 Bacteroidetes Cytophagia Cytophagales Hymenobacteraceae Hymenobacter Hymenobacter sedentarius 1538 4.52499338 3 Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadaceae Gemmatirosa Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis 1020 3.000970902 4 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas indica 797 2.344876284 5 Firmicutes Bacilli Lactobacillales Streptococcaceae Lactococcus Lactococcus piscium 542 1.594633558 6 Actinobacteria Thermoleophilia Solirubrobacterales Conexibacteraceae Conexibacter Conexibacter woesei 471 1.385742446 7 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas taxi 430 1.265115184 8 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas wittichii 388 1.141545794 9 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas sp. FARSPH 298 0.876754244 10 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sorangium cellulosum 260 0.764953367 11 Proteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Myxococcales Polyangiaceae Sorangium Sphingomonas sp. Cra20 260 0.764953367 12 Proteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Sphingomonadales Sphingomonadaceae Sphingomonas Sphingomonas panacis 252 0.741416341