Estudios Socioambientales En La Cuenca De Río Bayano

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Estudios Socioambientales En La Cuenca De Río Bayano “Análisis de Pre-factibilidad y factibilidad para determinar el Potencial del Río Bayano para la Producción de Agua Potable para las regiones de Panamá Este y Metropolitana” Contrato No. 025 (2016) Estudios Socioambientales en la Cuenca de Río Bayano Río Bayano, Provincia de Panamá Diciembre 2017 Índice 1. Introducción............................................................................................................................. 9 2. Objetivo ................................................................................................................................. 10 3. Alcance ................................................................................................................................... 10 4. Localización ............................................................................................................................ 11 5. Antecedentes ......................................................................................................................... 12 6. Metodología .......................................................................................................................... 12 7. Usos de suelo en la cuenca .................................................................................................... 15 8. Inventario de recursos de infraestructura en la cuenca ....................................................... 16 9. Características demográficas en la cuenca ............................................................................ 20 9.1 Metodología ................................................................................................................... 22 9.1.1 Fuentes de información empleada ............................................................................. 22 9.1.2 Determinación del Área de Influencia Social del Proyecto (AIS) ................................ 23 9.1.3 Determinación de la población muestral ................................................................... 27 9.1.4 Fuentes empleadas ..................................................................................................... 29 9.1.5 Análisis de los resultados ............................................................................................ 29 9.1.5.1 Tamaño y movimiento espacial de la población ................................................. 30 9.1.6 Composición de la población ...................................................................................... 34 9.1.6.1 Procedencia de la Población ............................................................................... 35 9.1.6.2 Antigüedad de la población ................................................................................ 36 9.1.6.3 Composición de la población por género ........................................................... 38 9.1.6.4 Jefatura de los hogares del AIS ........................................................................... 39 9.1.6.3 Pertenencia a alguna etnia indígena ................................................................... 42 9.1.6.4 Actividades económicas en el AIS ....................................................................... 43 9.1.6.5 Organización social: presencia de comités y asociaciones civiles ...................... 44 9.1.6.6 Movilidad (Acceso a medios de transporte) ....................................................... 45 9.1.6.7 Uso e Imaginario de Bienes Socio ambientales .................................................. 46 9.1.6.8 Percepción sobre los bienes ambientales más valiosos ..................................... 46 9.1.6.9 Uso principal de los bienes ambientales ............................................................. 47 9.1.6.10 Principales problemáticas que afectan al medio ambiente ................................ 48 9.1.6.11 Percepción sobre el futuro ambiental y doméstico si se desarrolla el proyecto 49 9.1.7 Estimación de la población al año 2025 (con y sin proyecto) .................................... 51 1 10. Características epidemiológicas en la cuenca ....................................................................... 55 10.1 Perfil Epidemiológico del Entorno .............................................................................. 56 10.2 Morbilidad declarada por la población del AIS .......................................................... 58 10.3 Situación de salud y estado de la red de salud .......................................................... 58 10.4 Disponibilidad de agua potable en los hogares del AIS .............................................. 59 10.5 Fuentes de agua para consumo de los hogares en el AIS .......................................... 60 10.6 Disponibilidad de servicio sanitario de los hogares en el AIS .................................... 60 10.7 Disposición final de la basura de los hogares en el AIS .............................................. 61 10.8 Establecimientos de salud existentes en el distrito de Chepo ................................... 62 10.9 Establecimientos de salud a los que acude la población del AIS ............................... 63 10.10 Conclusiones ........................................................................................................... 64 11. Descripción de la estructura económica de la cuenca .......................................................... 65 11.1 Área de influencia directa ........................................................................................... 65 11.1.1 Sector primario ....................................................................................................... 66 11.1.1.1 Aprovechamiento de la tierra ............................................................................. 66 11.1.1.2 Tenencia de la tierra ............................................................................................ 67 11.1.1.3 Producción agrícola ............................................................................................. 70 11.1.1.4 Producción pecuaria ............................................................................................ 73 11.1.2 Actividades Industriales en el Área de Influencia Directa ...................................... 78 11.1.3 Servicios en el Área de Influencia Directa .............................................................. 80 11.2 Área de influencia indirecta........................................................................................ 85 11.2.1. Sector primario .................................................................................................... 85 11.2.1.1. Aprovechamiento de la tierra ............................................................................. 85 11.2.1.2. Tenencia de la tierra ............................................................................................ 85 11.2.1.2.1. Producción agrícola ......................................................................................... 87 11.2.1.2.1.1. Cultivos temporales ....................................................................................... 87 11.2.1.2.1.2. Cultivos permanentes .................................................................................... 88 11.2.1.2.1.3. Producción pecuaria ...................................................................................... 88 11.2.1.2.1.4. Ganado vacuno .............................................................................................. 89 11.2.1.2.1.5. Ganado porcino ............................................................................................. 89 11.2.1.2.1.6. Aves de corral ................................................................................................ 90 11.2.1.2.1.7. Caballos, mulas, asnos y otros ....................................................................... 91 2 11.2.1.2.2. Industrias ......................................................................................................... 91 11.2.1.2.3. Comercios en el Área de Influencia Indirecta (AII) .......................................... 92 11.2.1.2.4. Servicios en el Área de Influencia Indirecta .................................................... 93 11.2.1.3. Participación de los sectores económicos en el Área de influencia indirecta .... 94 11.2.1.3.1. Generación y distribución del ingreso en el Área de Influencia Indirecta ...... 94 11.2.1.3.1.1. Comercios en el Área de Influencia Indirecta ................................................ 95 11.2.1.3.1.2. Servicios en el Área de Influencia Indirecta .................................................. 95 11.2.1.4. Participación de los sectores económicos en el Área de influencia indirecta .... 96 12. Inventario de características de paisajes escénicos .............................................................. 98 13. Informe resumido de la situación socioeconómica ............................................................. 100 13.1. Descripción específica de los recursos económicos existentes en la Cuenca ...... 101 13.2. Movimiento económico en el área de estudio ..................................................... 105 13.3. Aspectos más relevantes de la situación social ................................................... 106 14. Tipos de Hábitats ................................................................................................................. 111 14.1. Metodología .......................................................................................................... 112 14.2. Tipos de Hábitats en el Área de Influencia Directa
Recommended publications
  • Department of Biology (Pdf)
    Department of Biology 26 Summary The Department of Biology at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette took its current form in the late 1980s, with the merger of the Biology and Microbiology Departments. In Spring of 2019, the department has 28 professorial faculty members, 6 emeritus faculty members, and 7 instructors. Almost all professorial faculty members are active in research and serve as graduate faculty. Our graduate programs are also supported by 8 adjunct faculty members; their affiliations include the United States Geological Survey, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Smithsonian Institution. In this report, we summarize research accomplishments of our departmental faculty since 2013. The report is focused on our research strengths; however, faculty members have also been awarded considerable honors and funding for educational activities. We also briefly summarize the growth and size of our degree programs. Grant Productivity From 2013 through 2018, the Department of Biology has secured over 16 million dollars of new research funding (the total number of dollars associated with these grants, which are often multi- institutional, is considerably higher). Publications The faculty has a strong record of publication, with 279 papers published in peer-reviewed journals in the last 5 years. An additional 30 papers were published in conference proceedings or other edited volumes. Other Accomplishments Other notable accomplishments between 2013 and 2018 include faculty authorship of five books and edited volumes. Faculty members have served as editors, associate editors, or editorial board members for 21 different journals or as members of 34 society boards or grant review panels. They presented 107 of presentations as keynote addresses or invited seminars.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Deep Nodes in an Ancient Radiation of Neotropical Fishes in The
    Resolving Deep Nodes in an Ancient Radiation of Neotropical Fishes in the Presence of Conflicting Signals from Incomplete Lineage Sorting SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Table S1. Concordance factors and their 95% CI for the most frequent bipartitios in the concordance tree inferred from the Bayesian concordance analysis in BUCKy with values of α=1, 5, 10 and ∞. Bipartition α=1 α=5 α=10 α=∞ Gymnotiformes|… 0.961 (0.954-0.970) 0.961 (0.951-0.970) 0.96 (0.951-0.967) 0.848 (0.826-0.872) Apteronotidae|… 0.981 (0.973-0.989) 0.979 (0.970-0.986) 0.981 (0.973-0.989) 0.937 (0.918-0.954) Sternopygidae|… 0.558 (0.527-0.601) 0.565 (0.541-0.590) 0.571 (0.541-0.598) 0.347 (0.315-0.380) Pulseoidea|… 0.386 (0.353-0.435) 0.402 (0.372-0.438) 0.398 (0.353-0.440) 0.34 (0.304-0.375) Gymnotidae|… 0.29 (0.242-0.342) 0.277 (0.245-0.312) 0.285 (0.236-0.326) 0.157 (0.128-0.188) Rhamphichthyoidea|… 0.908 (0.886-0.924) 0.903 (0.872-0.924) 0.908 (0.886-0.924) 0.719 (0.690-0.747) Pulseoidea|… 0.386 (0.353-0.435) 0.402 (0.372-0.438) 0.398 (0.353-0.440) 0.34 (0.304-0.375) Table S2. Bootstrap support values recovered for the major nodes of the Gymnotiformes species tree inferred in ASTRAL-II for each one of the filtered and non-filtered datasets.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae), with Assignment to a New Genus
    Neotropical Ichthyology Original article https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2019-0126 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4ECB5004-B2C9-4467-9760-B4F11199DCF8 A redescription of deep-channel ghost knifefish, Sternarchogiton preto (Gymnotiformes: Apteronotidae), with assignment to a new genus Correspondence: 1 2 3 Maxwell J. Bernt Maxwell J. Bernt , Aaron H. Fronk , Kory M. Evans 2 [email protected] and James S. Albert From a study of morphological and molecular datasets we determine that a species originally described as Sternarchogiton preto does not form a monophyletic group with the other valid species of Sternarchogiton including the type species, S. nattereri. Previously-published phylogenetic analyses indicate that this species is sister to a diverse clade comprised of six described apteronotid genera. We therefore place it into a new genus diagnosed by the presence of three cranial fontanels, first and second infraorbital bones independent (not fused), the absence of an ascending process on the endopterygoid, and dark brown to black pigments over the body surface and fins membranes. We additionally provide Submitted November 13, 2019 a redescription of this enigmatic species with an emphasis on its osteology, and Accepted February 2, 2020 by provide the first documentation of secondary sexual dimorphism in this species. William Crampton Published April 20, 2020 Keywords: Amazonia, Neotropics, Sexual dimorphism, Systematics, Taxonomy. Online version ISSN 1982-0224 Print version ISSN 1679-6225 1 Department of Ichthyology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Neotrop. Ichthyol. Street, 10024-5192 New York, NY, USA. [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of Apteronotus Rostratus in the Wild
    The Life of Apteronotus rostratus, a Panamanian Species of Weakly Electric Fish: A Field Study Jan Gogarten McGill University Panamá Field Study Semester 2008 Independent Project - ENVR 451 Host Laboratories: Eldredge Bermingham [email protected] Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute Apartado Postal 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancon, Republic of Panama Rüdiger Krahe [email protected] McGill University - Department of Biology 1205 Docteur Penfield Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1 Gogarten 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary i. English p. 3 ii. Español p. 4 II. Host Information p. 5 III. Introduction p. 6 - 11 IV. Methodology p. 11 - 18 V. Results p. 18 - 30 VI. Discussion p. 31– 33 VII. Limitations and Problems p. 33 VIII. Acknowledgements/Reconocimientos p. 34 IX. Bibliography p. 35-36 X. Appendix i. Budget p. 37 ii. Chronogram of Activities p. 38-39 Gogarten 3 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ENGLISH: This study sought to provide insight into the life of Apteronotus rostratus, a species of weakly electric fish encountered in the rivers of Panama. Weakly electric fish have had their ability to actively generate electricity to sense their environment extensively studied in the laboratory, but little is known about their lives in the wild. A suitable study site was found at Piriati, in the Bayano region, where numerous Apteronotus rostratus were found in the river on an initial field outing. In order to fill the knowledge void about Apteronotus rostratus in the wild, four 200m transects were conducted in the Piriati river, and the location, habitat and frequency of every individual was taken (for a total of 240 Apteronotus rostratus sampled).
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Mitogenomics of Central American Weakly-Electric Fishes
    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gene journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gene Research paper Mitogenomics of Central American weakly-electric fishes Celestino Aguilara,b,c, Matthew J. Millerd, Jose R. Loaizaa,c, Rüdiger Krahee, Luis F. De Leóna,f,⁎ a Centro de Biodiversidad y Descubrimiento de Drogas, Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP), P. O. Box 0843-01103, Panama, Panama b Department of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, India c Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O. Box 0843-03092, Balboa Ancón, Panama, Panama d Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA e Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany f Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Electric fishes are a diverse group of freshwater organisms with the ability to generate electric organ discharges Gymnotiformes (EODs) that are used for communication and electrolocation. This group (ca. 200 species) has originated in South Intergenic spacer America, and six species colonized the Central American Isthmus. Here, we assembled the complete mi- Mitogenome tochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) for three Central American electric fishes (i.e. Sternopygus dariensis, Next generation sequencing Brachyhypopomus occidentalis, and Apteronotus rostratus), and, based on these data, explored their phylogenetic Panama position among Gymnotiformes. The three mitogenomes show the same gene order, as reported for other fishes, with a size ranging from 16,631 to 17,093 bp. We uncovered a novel 60 bp intergenic spacer (IGS) located between the COII and tRNALys genes, which appears to be unique to the Apteronotidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecología De Los Peces Amazónicos En El Ecuador, Pp
    Citación sugerida: Para todo el documento: Jiménez-Prado, P y J. Valdiviezo-Rivera (Eds.). 2021. Biodiversidad de peces en el Ecuador. Serie Especial de Ictiología Ecuatoriana I. Red Ecuatoriana de ictiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. 166 pp. Para sus capítulos: Puertas, C. 2021. Ecología de los peces amazónicos en el Ecuador, pp. 10 - 21. En Jiménez-Prado, P y J. Valdiviezo- Rivera (ed.). 2021. Biodiversidad de peces en el Ecuador. Serie Especial de Ictiología Ecuatoriana I. Red Ecuatoriana de ictiología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Esmeraldas, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. 166 pp. ISBN: 9 7 8 - 9 9 4 2 - 4 0 - 1 5 4 - 0 D.R. © Red Ecuatoriana de Ictiología Responsabilidad: El material aquí presentado, así como las opiniones expresadas, no representan necesariamente el juicio o las políticas de las instituciones participantes. Todo lo expresado es de la entera responsabilidad de los autores. Los escritos y la información presentada han sido editadas con aprobación previa de sus autores. Cuerpo editorial para la revisión ciega por pares Aguirre Windsor. Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago. Buenaño Martha. Ictióloga independiente. Burgos Ricardo. Departamento de Ciencias de la Tierra, Universidad Estatal amazónica. Carrillo-Moreno Carolina. Investigadora asociada del INABIO. Carvache- Wilan Evelyn. Ictióloga independiente. Escobar-Camacho Daniel. Laboratorio de Ecología Acuática, Instituto Biósfera, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador Moreno Cristhian. Ictiólogo independiente. Nugra Fredy. Laboratorio de Limnología de la Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador. Revelo-Ramírez Willian. Unidad de Recursos Demersales Bentónicos de Agua Dulce y Embalses, Instituto Público de Investigación de Acuicultura y Pesca.
    [Show full text]
  • Apteronotidae, by James S. Albert
    Apteronotidae, by James S. Albert Apteronotidae by: James S. Albert Family Apterontoidae. Pp 503-508 In: R.E. Reis, S.O. Kullander & C.J. Ferraris, Jr. (eds). Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. 2003, Edipucrs, Porto Alegre, 735p. Species diversity and systematics of the Apteronotidae has been reviewed by Mago-Leccia (1994), Albert and Campos-da-Paz (1998), and Albert (2001). Apteronotid species are readily recognized as the only gymnotiform fishes with a caudal fin and a dorsal organ (a longitudinal strip of fleshy tissue firmly attached to posterodorsal midline). Among gymnotiforms, apteronotid species also possess the following unique combination of characters: small eye (its diameter less than distance between nares); infraorbital and supraorbital laterosensory lines connected anterior to eye; infraorbital bones ossified as slender tubes; anterior nares located outside gape; no urogenital papilla; 1-2 rows of conical teeth in both jaws; anal-fin origin at, or anterior to, isthmus; no urogenital papilla. Apteronotids also possess a high frequency tone-type electric organ discharge (more than 750 Hz at maturity). There are currently 72 names available in the literature for apteronotid genera and species. Of these, 13 generic and 52 species names are valid. There are in addition 12 manuscript names for species currently in preparation, bringing the known diversity of the Apteronotidae to 64 species. Many more apteronotid species are anticipated, as the rate of description is accelerating. Apteronotids are relatively conservative in terms of overall external morphology. Like all gymnotiforms the shape is typically culteriform, with an elongate body and anal fin. Higher level apteronotid taxonomy emphasizes differences in snout length and shape, and shape and position of the mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghost Knifefishes
    FAMILY Apteronotidae Jordan, 1923 - ghost knifefishes [=?Ophichthytes, Sternarchidae, Adontosternarchinae, Sternarchorhynchinae, Oedemognathinae, Sternarchorhamphini, Sternarchellini, Porotergini] GENUS Adontosternarchus Ellis, in Eigenmann, 1912 - ghost knifefishes Species Adontosternarchus balaenops (Cope, 1878) - Pebas ghost knifefish Species Adontosternarchus clarkae Mago-Leccia et al., 1985 - Raudal ghost knifefish Species Adontosternarchus devenanzii Mago-Leccia et al., 1985 - Cano Cuajarito dwarf knifefish Species Adontosternarchus duartei de Santana & Vari, 2012 - Beruri ghost knifefish Species Adontosternarchus nebulosus Lundberg & Cox Fernandes, 2007 - nebulosus ghost knifefish Species Adontosternarchus sachsi (Peters, 1877) - Sachs' ghost knifefish GENUS Apteronotus Lacépède, 1800 - ghost knifefishes, black ghost knifefishes [=Memarchus, Sternarchus, Ubidia] Species Apteronotus acidops Triques, 2011 - long-snouted electric fish Species Apteronotus albifrons (Linnaeus, 1758) - apteronotid eel [=lacepedii, maximilliani, passan] Species Apteronotus anu de Santana & Vari, 2013 - black ghost knifefish Species Apteronotus apurensis Fernández-Yépez, 1968 - Apure ghost knifefish Species Apteronotus baniwa de Santana & Vari, 2013 - Baniwa ghost knifefish Species Apteronotus bonapartii (Castelnau, 1855) - Bonapart's ghost knifefish [=anas] Species Apteronotus brasiliensis (Reinhardt, 1852) - Velhas ghost knifefish Species Apteronotus camposdapazi de Santana & Lehmann A., 2006 - Rosariana black electric ghost knifefish Species Apteronotus
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from by Bukkyo University User on 06 December 2018
    Resolving Deep Nodes in an Ancient Radiation of Neotropical Fishes in the Presence of Conflicting Signals from Incomplete Lineage Sorting Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syy085/5232148 by Bukkyo University user on 06 December 2018 Fernando Alda1,2*, Victor A. Tagliacollo3, Maxwell J. Bernt4, Brandon T. Waltz4, William B. Ludt1, Brant C. Faircloth1, Michael E. Alfaro5, James S. Albert4, Prosanta Chakrabarty1 1Museum of Natural Science, Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA 2Current address: Department of Biology, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA 3Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo (MZUSP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 4Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA *Corresponding author Fernando Alda University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Dpt. of Biology, Geology and Environmental Science Holt Hall, 620 E 5th St. Chattanooga, TN 70803 Phone: (423) 425-4341 E-Mail: [email protected] © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Resolving patterns of ancient and rapid diversifications is one of the most challenging Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/sysbio/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/sysbio/syy085/5232148 by Bukkyo University user on 06 December 2018 tasks in evolutionary biology. These difficulties arise from confusing phylogenetic signals that are associated with the interplay of incomplete lineage sorting and homoplasy.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core Alternative to the Updating Problem
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 708: 25–138Checklist (2017) of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative... 25 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.708.13897 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative to the updating problem Carlos DoNascimiento1, Edgar Esteban Herrera-Collazos2, Guido A. Herrera-R.2, Armando Ortega-Lara3, Francisco A. Villa-Navarro4, José Saulo Usma Oviedo5, Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo2 1 Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva, Colombia 2 Laboratorio de Ictiología, Unidad de Ecología y Sistemática (UNESIS), Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, DC, Colombia 3 Grupo de Investigación en Peces Neotropicales, Fundación para la Investigación y el Desarrollo Sostenible (FUNINDES), Cali, Colombia 4 Grupo de Investigación en Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué, Colombia 5 Programa Ecosistemas de Agua Dulce de WWF Colombia, Cali, Colombia Corresponding authors: Carlos DoNascimiento ([email protected]); Javier A. Maldonado-Ocampo ([email protected]) Academic editor: N. Bogutskaya | Received 31 May 2017 | Accepted 8 September 2017 | Published 16 October 2017 http://zoobank.org/FB01BD9E-6656-4FA8-AFB0-4EC546CFF953 Citation: DoNascimiento C, Herrera-Collazos EE, Herrera-R GA, Ortega-Lara A, Villa-Navarro FA, Usma-Oviedo JS, Maldonado-Ocampo JA (2017) Checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia: a Darwin Core alternative to the updating problem. ZooKeys 708: 25–138. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.708.13897 Abstract The present work is part of a process to create a Catalogue of the Freshwater Fishes of Colombia and consisted in the depuration and updating of the taxonomic and geographic components of the checklist of the freshwater fishes of Colombia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitogenomics of Central American Weakly-Electric Fishes
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328983837 Mitogenomics of Central American weakly-electric fishes Article in Gene · November 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.045 CITATION READS 1 140 provided by Repositorio INDICASAT AIP View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk CORE brought to you by 5 authors, including: Celestino Aguilar Matthew J. Miller Instituto de Investigaciones Cientificas y Servicios de Alta Tecnologia University of Oklahoma 12 PUBLICATIONS 43 CITATIONS 85 PUBLICATIONS 765 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Jose R Loaiza Luis F. De León Instituto de Investigaciones Cientificas y Servicios de Alta Tecnologia University of Massachusetts Boston 146 PUBLICATIONS 510 CITATIONS 45 PUBLICATIONS 661 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Woodpecker Genomics, Species Limits, and Molecular Evolution View project Evolutionary, behavioral, & conservation ecology of Mimidae View project All content following this page was uploaded by Matthew J. Miller on 20 January 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Gene 686 (2019) 164–170 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Gene journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/gene Research paper Mitogenomics of Central American weakly-electric fishes T ⁎ Celestino Aguilara,b,c, Matthew J. Millerd, Jose R. Loaizaa,c, Rüdiger Krahee, Luis F. De Leóna,f, a Centro de Biodiversidad y Descubrimiento de Drogas, Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP), P. O. Box 0843-01103, Panama, Panama b Department of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, India c Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes and Phylogenetic Analysis of Central American Weakly-Electric
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/353565; this version posted June 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Mitochondrial genomes and phylogenetic analysis of Central American weakly-electric 2 fishes: Apteronotus rostratus, Brachyhypopomus occidentalis and Sternopygus dariensis 3 4 Celestino Aguilara ,b,c, Matthew J. Millerd, Jose R. Loaizaa,c, Rüdiger Krahee and Luis F. De 5 Leóna,f 6 7 a Centro de Biodiversidad y Descubrimiento de Drogas, Instituto de Investigaciones 8 Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP), P. O. Box 0843-01103, 9 Panama, Republic of Panama 10 b Department of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Guntur, India 11 c Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, P.O. Box 0843-03092, Balboa Ancón, Panama, 12 Republic of Panama 13 d Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History and Department of Biology, University of 14 Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA 15 e Institut für Biologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany 16 f Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA 17 18 * For correspondence: LFD – Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 19 Boston, MA, USA, email: [email protected] 20 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/353565; this version posted June 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]