DOCSLIB.ORG

Problems of English Grammar

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Problems of English Grammar Problems of English Grammar Version 6.0 Prof. Dr. Russell Block University of Applied Sciences - München Department 13 - General Studies Summer Semester 2018 © 2018 by Russell Block Um eine gute Note in der Klausur zu erzielen, genügt es nicht, das Buch zu lesen. Sie müssen auch die “Show” sehen! The causes why our English tongue hath not yet been thoroughly perceived are the hope and despair of such as have either thought upon it, and not dealt in it, or that have dealt in it, but not rightly thought upon it. Richard Mulcaster (1582) Contents Part I: Languages and Language Learning ................................... 9 1 Language learning .................................................. 9 1.1 First language – child in appropriate situation . 9 1.2 What children learn............................................ 9 1.2.1 Evidence from errors (9) 1.2.2 Impoverished corpus (9) 1.2.3 Different corpuses – same grammar (10) 1.3 Critical age hypothesis ........................................ 10 1.3.1 Brain damage (10) 1.3.2 Genie (10) 1.3.3 Experience (10) 1.4 Second language learning ..................................... 11 1.4.1 Children – classroom experience ineffective (11) 1.4.2 Adults – No longer able to extract the rules from simple exposure. (11) 1.4.3 First and Second Language Learning - extracting the rules (11) 2 Contrastive Linguistics.............................................. 15 2.1 Basic thesis................................................. 15 2.2 English as a Second Language (ESL) in the USA and in Germany . 15 2.3 The mapping problem......................................... 16 3 Difficulties of English .............................................. 17 3.1 Tense and aspect system....................................... 17 3.2 Complementation system ...................................... 17 Part II: The Theoretical Framework ....................................... 19 framework............................................................. 19 2 What can be a rule of English grammar?................................. 19 2.1 Syntactic rules: - ing-form after a preposition (20) 2.2 Semantically based rules (20) 2.3 Pragmatically based rules (21) 2.4 Conversational implicatures (21) 2.5 Perceptional rules (22) 2.6 Discourse rules (23) 2.7 Historical relicts (23) 3 Transformational rules .............................................. 24 3.1 Phrase order rules............................................ 27 3.2 Function changing transformations - the cycle . 29 3.3 Verb Raising................................................ 31 3.4 The strange case of for ........................................ 32 -4- 3.5 Deletion transformations....................................... 34 3.7 Extraction – WH-Movement ................................... 36 3.8 Syntactic ambiguity .......................................... 38 3.8.1 The line between syntax and pragmatics (39) Close correspondencies ............................................. 40 3.10 Articles (41) 3.11 Problems of determiners - set theory (41) 3.12 Negative polarity (43) 3.13 Negative attraction (45) 3.14 Surface case assignment (47) 3.15 Shadow pronouns (49) 3.16 Promotion and demotion (51) 3.17 Unaccusative and German sich (53) Part III: Aspect and the English Verb System ................................ 56 1 The English tense and aspect system ................................... 56 1.1 English verb morphology (the forms of the English verb) . 56 1.2 Tenses .................................................... 56 1.3 Aspects ................................................... 56 1.3.1 (57) 1.3.2 Continuous form (Delimited) (58) 1.3.3 Perfect form (58) 1.3.3.1 Resultative (58) 1.3.3.2 Anterior (59) 1.3.4 Present perfect continuous (59) 1.4 Additional ways to express aspect................................ 59 2 Simple present vs. present continuous .................................. 60 2.1.1 Restrictions on the continuous (62) 2.1.2 Continuous form and inherent aspect (63) 2.1.3 Timelessness of the present (64) 2.1.4 Historical holdovers (66) 2.2 Simple past and past continuous ................................. 66 2.3 Simple past and present perfect.................................. 69 2.4 Present perfect and present perfect continuous . 74 2.5 Repeated action ............................................. 77 2.5.1 Past perfect (79) 2.5.2 Past perfect continuous (79) 2.5.3 Future perfect and future perfect continuous (79) 3 The future system - pragmatics........................................ 80 3.1 The future indefinite - will vs. the future definite going to + inf. ........ 80 3.2 Will and shall ............................................... 82 3.3 The decided future - be + Vb-ing ................................ 83 3.4 The speculative future - will + be + -ing .......................... 84 3.5 The definite scheduled future - simple present . 84 3.6 The putative scheduled future - be + to + Vb ....................... 85 -5- 3.7 The hypothetical future – would + inf. ............................ 85 3.8 The future perfect............................................ 85 3.9 English and German future ..................................... 86 3.10 Summary of English future forms ................................ 86 4 Indirect Discourse ................................................. 87 4.1 What is Indirect Discourse? .................................... 87 4.2 Indirect Discourse in German ................................... 87 4.3 Indirect Discourse in English ................................... 87 4.4 Future complications ......................................... 88 4.5 Past complications ........................................... 88 4.6 Imperatives................................................. 90 4.7 Epithets (name calling) ........................................ 90 4.8 Yes-no questions ............................................ 91 4.9 Deictic problems............................................. 91 4.10 The sequence of tenses ........................................ 92 5 The conditional ................................................... 93 5.1 Present real conditions ........................................ 93 5.2 Future real conditions......................................... 93 5.3 Past real conditions........................................... 94 5.4 Present unreal conditions ...................................... 94 5.5 Future unreal conditions ....................................... 94 5.5.1 Present/future unreal (95) 5.5.2 Accidental future unreal (95) 5.5.3 Unlikely future unreal (95) 5.6 Past unreal conditions......................................... 95 5.7 Conditional as a substitute for the past subjunctive . 96 6 The Subjunctive ................................................... 97 6.1 Subjunctive verb forms ....................................... 97 6.1.1 Present subjunctive (97) 6.2 Do-support .............................................. 98 6.3 Past subjunctive ............................................. 98 6.4 Optative and ad hortative ...................................... 98 6.4.1 The past subjunctive as optative (99) 6.5 Uses of the present subjunctive . 99 6.5.1 After verbs of requesting, suggesting, insisting and demanding (99) 6.5.2 Subjunctive with necessary conditions (99) 6.5.3 Formal literary uses of the present subjunctive (100) 6.5.3.1 Concessive clauses (100); 6.5.3.2 Negative clauses of intention introduced by lest (100) 6.6 The past subjunctive......................................... 101 6.6.1 Unreal conditions (101) 6.6.2 Hypothetical comparisons (101) 6.7 With the verb seems ........................................ 101 -6- Part IV: The English Complementation System – Complex Sentences: ........... 102 1 Clauses ........................................................ 102 1.1 Form of the verb............................................ 102 1.1.1 Finite clause (102) 1.1.2 Infinitive clauses (102) 1.1.3 Gerund clauses (103) 1.1.4 Participial clauses (103) 1.2 Part of speech.............................................. 103 1.3 Grammatical function ........................................ 104 1.4 Gerunds and abstract nouns ................................... 104 1.5 The Gerund = German zu + inf., dass-clause ...................... 105 1.6 Subject Clauses ............................................ 107 1.7 Object clauses.............................................. 110 1.7.1 Choice of complements (111) 1.7.1.2 Semantic classes (113); 1.7.1.3 Factive predicates (114) 1.8 Objects of a preposition = German da-construction (O.E. inflected infinitive) ........................................................ 115 1.9 Clause prepositions and subordinating conjunctions . 116 1.10 Adverbial clauses ........................................... 118 1.11 The absolute participial construction - German (rare) . 118 1.12 Adverbial adjuncts with prepositions . 119 1.13 Adverbial clauses after verbs of perception . 120 1.14 Clauses with aspectual verbs................................... 122 1.14.1 After verbs of action – starting, stopping, continuing (122) 1.14.2 After verbs of motion and position (124) 1.14.3 After go with verbs of motion (125) 2 Relative Clauses.................................................. 125 2.1 Relative clause – adjective and determiner . 125 2.2 Relative pronouns and relative particles . 126 2.3 Major types of relative clauses . 128 2.4 Defining, restrictive and nonrestrictive relative clauses . 128 2.4.1 Proper names (130) 2.5 Who, whom, whose, which .................................... 130 2.6 Omission of the relative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lexical and Syntactic Ambiguity As a Source of Humor: the Case of Newspaper Headlines
    Lexical and syntactic ambiguity as a source of humor: The case of newspaper headlines CHIARA BUCARIA Abstract The paper analyzes some forms of linguistic ambiguity in English in a specific register, i.e. newspaper headlines. In particular, the focus of the research is on examples of lexical and syntactic ambiguity that result in sources of voluntary or involuntary humor. The study is based on a corpus of 135 verbally ambiguous headlines found on web sites presenting humor- ous bits of information. The linguistic phenomena that contribute to create this kind of semantic confusion in headlines will be analyzed and divided into the three main categories of lexical, syntactic, and phonological ambi- guity, and examples from the corpus will be discussed for each category. The main results of the study were that, firstly, contrary to the findings of previous research on jokes, syntactically ambiguous headlines were found in good percentage in the corpus and that this might point to di¤erences in genre. Secondly, two new configurations for the processing of the disjunctor/connector order were found. In the first of these configurations the disjunctor appears before the connector, instead of being placed after or coinciding with the ambiguous element, while in the second one two ambig- uous elements are present, each of which functions both as a connector and a disjunctor. Keywords: Ambiguity; headlines; lexical; syntactic; disjunctor; connector. Introduction The present paper sets out to analyze some forms of linguistic ambiguity in English in a specific register, i.e. newspaper headlines. In particular, the Humor 17–3 (2004), 279–309 0933–1719/04/0017–0279 6 Walter de Gruyter 280 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of Language
    01:615:201 Introduction to Linguistic Theory Adam Szczegielniak The Meaning of Language Copyright in part: Cengage learning The Meaning of Language • When you know a language you know: • When a word is meaningful or meaningless, when a word has two meanings, when two words have the same meaning, and what words refer to (in the real world or imagination) • When a sentence is meaningful or meaningless, when a sentence has two meanings, when two sentences have the same meaning, and whether a sentence is true or false (the truth conditions of the sentence) • Semantics is the study of the meaning of morphemes, words, phrases, and sentences – Lexical semantics: the meaning of words and the relationships among words – Phrasal or sentential semantics: the meaning of syntactic units larger than one word Truth • Compositional semantics: formulating semantic rules that build the meaning of a sentence based on the meaning of the words and how they combine – Also known as truth-conditional semantics because the speaker’ s knowledge of truth conditions is central Truth • If you know the meaning of a sentence, you can determine under what conditions it is true or false – You don’ t need to know whether or not a sentence is true or false to understand it, so knowing the meaning of a sentence means knowing under what circumstances it would be true or false • Most sentences are true or false depending on the situation – But some sentences are always true (tautologies) – And some are always false (contradictions) Entailment and Related Notions • Entailment: one sentence entails another if whenever the first sentence is true the second one must be true also Jack swims beautifully.
    [Show full text]
  • English Grammar for Students of French
    English Grammar for Students of French The Study Guide for Those Learning French Seventh edition Jacqueline Morton with the collaboration of Hélène Neu, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor The Olivia and Hill Press® THE O&H STUDY GUIDES Jacqueline Morton, editor English Grammar for Students of Spanish English Grammar for Students of French English Grammar for Students of German English Grammar for Students of Italian English Grammar for Students of Latin English Grammar for Students of Russian English Grammar for Students of Japanese English Grammar for Students of Arabic English Grammar for Students of Chinese Gramática española para estudiantes de inglés © 2013, Jacqueline Morton All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or trans- mitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the U.S.A. ISBN: 978-0-934034-42-5 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013930691 CONTENTS Study Tips 1 Tips for learning grammar 1 Tips for learning vocabulary 2 Tips for learning word forms 4 Tips for effective study 4 1. What’s in a Word? 6 Meaning 6 Part of speech 6 Function 7 Form 7 2. What is a Noun? 9 3. What is Meant by Gender? 11 4. What is Meant by Number? 14 Hearing the plural 15 5. What is an Article? 16 Definite articles 16 Indefinite articles 18 Non-count nouns and partitive articles` 20 Study Tips — Nouns and their gender 21 6. What is the Possessive? 22 7.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: a Comparative Analysis
    Nicholas Catasso 7 Journal of Universal Language 12-1 March 2011, 7-46 The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis Nicholas Catasso Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia * Abstract An article, irrespective of its distribution across natural languages, dialects and varieties, is a member of the class of determiners which particularizes a noun according to language-specific principles of grammatical and semantic structuring. Definite articles in Indo- European languages – in those grammatical systems where they are present – are derived from ancient demonstratives through a grammaticalization process: given that demonstratives are deictic expressions (i.e. they depend on a frame of reference which is external to that of the speaker and of the interlocutor) with the role of selecting a referent or a set of referents, it is easy to understand what the role of “universal quantifier” of the, which is in English the prototypical – but questionable – example of definiteness, is due to. Demonstratives are frequently reanalyzed across languages as grammatical markers (very often as definite articles, but also as copulas, relative and third person pronouns, sentence connectives, Nicholas Catasso Dipartimento di Scienze del Linguaggio - Dorsoduro 3462 - VENEZIA 30123 (VE) Phone 0039-3463157243; Email: [email protected] Received Oct. 2010; Reviewed Dec. 2010; Revised version received Jan. 2011. 8 The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis focus markers, etc.). In this article I concentrate on the grammaticalization of the definite article in English, adopting a comparative-contrastive approach (including a wide range of Indo- European languages), given the complexity of the article. Keywords: grammaticalization, definite articles, English, Indo- European languages, definiteness 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Automated Detection of Syntactic Ambiguity Using Shallow Parsing and Web Data by Reza Khezri [email protected]
    DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY, LINGUISTICS AND THEORY OF SCIENCE Automated Detection of Syntactic Ambiguity Using Shallow Parsing and Web Data By Reza Khezri [email protected] Master’s Thesis, 30 credits Master’s Programme in Language Technology Autumn, 2017 Supervisor: Prof. Staffan Larsson Keywords: ambiguity, ambiguity detection tool, ambiguity resolution, syntactic ambiguity, Shallow Parsing, Google search API, PythonAnywhere, PP attachment ambiguity Abstract: Technical documents are mostly written in natural languages and they are highly ambiguity-prone due to the fact that ambiguity is an inevitable feature of natural languages. Many researchers have urged technical documents to be free from ambiguity to avoid unwanted and, in some cases, disastrous consequences ambiguity and misunderstanding can have in technical context. Therefore the need for ambiguity detection tools to assist writers with ambiguity detection and resolution seems indispensable. The purpose of this thesis work is to propose an automated approach in detection and resolution of syntactic ambiguity. AmbiGO is the name of the prototyping web application that has been developed for this thesis which is freely available on the web. The hope is that a developed version of AmbiGO will assist users with ambiguity detection and resolution. Currently AmbiGO is capable of detecting and resolving three types of syntactic ambiguity, namely analytical, coordination and PP attachment types. AmbiGO uses syntactic parsing to detect ambiguity patterns and retrieves frequency counts from Google for each possible reading as a segregate for semantic analysis. Such semantic analysis through Google frequency counts has significantly improved the precision score of the tool’s output in all three ambiguity detection functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in Linguistics
    STiL Studies in Linguistics Proceedings XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa Vol 3. 2009 CISCL CENTRO INTERDIPARTIMENTALE DI STUDI COGNITIVI SUL LINGUAGGIO Interdepartmental Centre for Cognitive Studies on Language Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI SIENA Studies In Linguistics Vol3, 2009 2 STiL Studies in Linguistics Edited by: Vincenzo Moscati Emilio Servidio Correspondence can be addressed to: CISCL – Centro Interdipartimentale di Studi Cognitivi sul Linguaggio Dipartimento di Scienze della Comunicazione Complesso S. Niccolò, Via Roma, 56 I-53100 Siena, Italy or by email at: moscati unisi.it 3 Contents Maria Teresa Guasti, Chiara Branchini, Fabrizio Arosio Agreement in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions 6 Liliane Haegeman The syntax of conditional clauses 28 Maria Rita Manzini & Leonardo Savoia Mesoclisis in the Imperative: Phonology, Morphology or Syntax? 51 Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts Linearization and the Architecture of Grammar: A view from the Final-over- Final Constraint 77 Gloria Cocchi Bantu verbal extensions: a cartographic approach 90 Federica Cognola TopicPs and Relativised Minimality in Mòcheno left periphery 104 Silvio Cruschina & Eva-Maria Remberger Focus Fronting in Sardinian and Sicilian 118 Maria Teresa Espinal & Jaume Mateu On bare nominals and argument structure 131 Irene Franco Stylistic Fronting: a comparative analysis 144 Hanako Fujino The Adnominal Form in Japanese as a Relativization Strategy 158 Ion Giurgea Romanian null objects and gender
    [Show full text]
  • Lightweight Monadic Programming in ML
    Lightweight Monadic Programming in ML Nikhil Swamy? Nataliya Gutsy Daan Leijen? Michael Hicksy ?Microsoft Research, Redmond yUniversity of Maryland, College Park Abstract ing [26]. In a monadic type system, if values are given type τ then Many useful programming constructions can be expressed as mon- computations are given type m τ for some monad constructor m. ads. Examples include probabilistic modeling, functional reactive For example, an expression of type IO τ in Haskell represents programming, parsing, and information flow tracking, not to men- a computation that will produce (if it terminates) a value of type tion effectful functionality like state and I/O. In this paper, we τ but may perform effectful operations in the process. Haskell’s present a type-based rewriting algorithm to make programming Monad type class, which requires the bind and unit operations with arbitrary monads as easy as using ML’s built-in support for given above, is blessed with special syntax, the do notation, for state and I/O. Developers write programs using monadic values programming with instances of this class. of type m τ as if they were of type τ, and our algorithm inserts Moggi [22], Filinksi [11], and others have noted that ML pro- the necessary binds, units, and monad-to-monad morphisms so that grams, which are impure and observe a deterministic, call-by-value evaluation order, are inherently monadic. For example, the value the program type checks. Our algorithm, based on Jones’ qualified 0 types, produces principal types. But principal types are sometimes λx.e can be viewed as having type τ ! m τ : the argument problematic: the program’s semantics could depend on the choice type τ is never monadic because x is always bound to a value in of instantiation when more than one instantiation is valid.
    [Show full text]
  • An Approach for Detecting Syntax and Syntactic Ambiguity in Software Requirement Specification
    Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 30th April 2018. Vol.96. No 8 © 2005 – ongoing JATIT & LLS ISSN: 1992-8645 www.jatit.org E-ISSN: 1817-3195 AN APPROACH FOR DETECTING SYNTAX AND SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY IN SOFTWARE REQUIREMENT SPECIFICATION 1 ALI OLOW JIM’ALE SABRIYE, 2*WAN MOHD NAZMEE WAN ZAINON 1Faculty of Computing, SIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia 2School of Computer Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT Software requirements are considered to be ambiguous if the requirements statement could have more than one interpretation. The ambiguous requirements could cause the software developers to develop software which is different from what the customer needs. The focus of this paper is to propose an approach to detect syntax and syntactic ambiguity in software requirements specification. In this paper, Parts of speech (POS) tagging technique has been used to detect these ambiguities. A prototype tool has been developed in order to evaluate the proposed approach. The evaluation is done by comparing the detection capabilities of the proposed tool against human capabilities. The overall results show that the humans do have some difficulties in detecting ambiguity in software requirements, especially the syntactic ambiguity and software requirements that contains both syntax and syntactic ambiguity in one sentence. The proposed tool can definitely help the analyst in detecting ambiguity in Software requirements. Keywords: Part of speech tagging, Syntax ambiguity, Syntactic ambiguity, Software requirements specification. 1. INTRODUCTION can negatively affect in all the software development process [7]. Software requirement specification (SRS) document is an important document with a full Ambiguity in SRS can cause some big issues that description about functional and non-functional can affect the software development process because requirements of a software sys-tem to be developed different interpretations can turn into bugs (such as [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The Ambiguous Nature of Language
    International J. Soc. Sci. & Education 2017 Vol.7 Issue 4, ISSN: 2223-4934 E and 2227-393X Print The Ambiguous Nature of Language By Mohammad Awwad Applied Linguistics, English Department, Lebanese University, Beirut, LEBANON. [email protected] Abstract Linguistic ambiguity is rendered as a problematic issue since it hinders precise language processing. Ambiguity leads to a confusion of ideas in the reader’s mind when he struggles to decide on the precise meaning intended behind an utterance. In the literature relevant to the topic, no clear classification of linguistic ambiguity can be traced, for what is considered syntactic ambiguity, for some linguists, falls under pragmatic ambiguity for others; what is rendered as lexical ambiguity for some linguists is perceived as semantic ambiguity for others and still as unambiguous to few. The problematic issue, hence, can be recapitulated in the abstruseness hovering around what is linguistic ambiguity, what is not, and what comprises each type of ambiguity in language. The present study aimed at propounding lucid classification of ambiguity types according to their function in context by delving into ambiguity types which are displayed in English words, phrases, clauses, and sentences. converges in an attempt to disambiguate English language structures, and thus provide learners with a better language processing outcome and enhance teachers with a more facile and lucid teaching task. Keywords: linguistic ambiguity, language processing. 1. Introduction Ambiguity is derived from ‘ambiagotatem’ in Latin which combined ‘ambi’ and ‘ago’ each word meaning ‘around’ or ‘by’ (Atlas,1989) , and thus the concept of ambiguity is hesitation, doubt, or uncertainty and that concept associated the term ‘ambiguous’ from the first usage until the most recent linguistic definition.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Grounds for Commitment Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1ps845ks Author Northrup, Oliver Burton Publication Date 2014 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ GROUNDS FOR COMMITMENT A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in LINGUISTICS by Oliver Northrup June 2014 The Dissertation of Oliver Northrup is approved: Professor Donka Farkas, Chair Professor Pranav Anand Professor Adrian Brasoveanu Dean Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Oliver Northrup 2014 Table of Contents List of Figures vi List of Tables vii Abstract viii Acknowledgments x 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview ......................................... 1 1.2 Discourse is a commitment space . 5 1.2.1 The common ground . 5 1.2.2 Affecting the common ground . 7 1.2.3 Discourse commitments . 9 1.2.4 An initial model of discourse . 11 2 An evidential model of discourse 17 2.1 Introduction ........................................ 17 2.2 Variation in commitment . 19 2.2.1 Sourcehood . 19 2.2.2 Conditional commitment . 22 2.2.3 A fledgling model of discourse . 28 2.3 Evidentiality as grounds for commitment . 29 2.3.1 Evidentiality primer . 29 2.3.2 The not-at-issue effects of evidentiality . 32 2.4 A revised model for commitments . 38 2.4.1 Model architecture . 38 2.4.2 Examples . 47 2.4.3 Summary . 54 2.5 Further evidence and issues . 54 2.5.1 Attested and unattested bases .
    [Show full text]
  • The Semantic Nature of Tense Ambiguity: Resolving Tense and Aspect in Japanese Phrasal Constructions
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics Linguistics 2017 THE SEMANTIC NATURE OF TENSE AMBIGUITY: RESOLVING TENSE AND ASPECT IN JAPANESE PHRASAL CONSTRUCTIONS Annabelle T. Bruno University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2017.421 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Bruno, Annabelle T., "THE SEMANTIC NATURE OF TENSE AMBIGUITY: RESOLVING TENSE AND ASPECT IN JAPANESE PHRASAL CONSTRUCTIONS" (2017). Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics. 24. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ltt_etds/24 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Linguistics at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Linguistics by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • French Language Studies – Grammar Reference Resource
    French Language Studies – Grammar Reference Resource Contents Nouns ................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction to Nouns ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 number: singular, plural ................................................................................................................................................. 6 Gender: Masculine, Feminine ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Voila vs. il y a .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 Temps, heure, fois ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 Determiners ...................................................................................................................................................................... 13 Introduction to Determiners .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Determiners: Definite Articles .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]