Comparison of Empirical Propagation Path Loss Models for Fixed Wireless Access Systems V.S. Abhayawardhana∗, I.J. Wassell†,D.Crosby‡, M.P. Sellars‡,M.G.Brown§ ∗ BT Mobility Research Unit, Rigel House, Adastral Park, Ipswich IP5 3RE, UK.
[email protected] †LCE, Dept. of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
[email protected] ‡Cambridge Broadband Ltd., Selwyn House, Cowley Rd., Cambridge CB4 OWZ, UK. {dcrosby,msellars}@cambridgebroadband.com §Cotares Ltd., 67, Narrow Lane, Histon, Cambridge CB4 9YP, UK.
[email protected] Abstract— Empirical propagation models have found favour in Stanford University Interim (SUI) channel models developed both research and industrial communities owing to their speed of under the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers execution and their limited reliance on detailed knowledge of the (IEEE) 802.16 working group [2]. Examples of non-time- terrain. Although the study of empirical propagation models for mobile channels has been exhaustive, their applicability for FWA dispersive empirical models are ITU-R [7], Hata [8] and the systems is yet to be properly validated. Among the contenders, COST-231 Hata model [3]. All these models predict mean path the ECC-33 model [1], the Stanford University Interim (SUI) loss as a function of various parameters, for example distance, models [2] and the COST-231 Hata model [3] show the most antenna heights etc. Although empirical propagation models promise. In this paper, a comprehensive set of propagation for mobile systems have been comprehensively validated, measurements taken at 3.5 GHz in Cambridge, UK is used to validate the applicability of the three models mentioned their appropriateness for FWA systems has not been fully previously for rural, suburban and urban environments.