DOCSLIB.ORG

Boctor Oc $Fitlofi(Opf)}>

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boctor Oc $Fitlofi(Opf)}> STATE ELECTIONS: A STUDY OF 1996 ASSEMBLY ELECTION IN UP ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Boctor oC $fitlofi(opf)}> IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY SAN]EDA WARSI UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Prof. M. ASMER BEG DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2008 ABSTRACT Uttar Pradesh, a relatively backward state, has been important in India's politics since independence. It has always played a decisive role in the formation of the government at the centre as it used to have 85 lok sabha seats. It is India's fifth largest state with basically an agrarian society. After independence, leaders tried to politicize these peasants and convert them in their vote bank. Rich peasants from upper castes dominated U.P. politics for a long period. Uttar Pradesh has a heterogeneous society which' is divided into different castes and communities. Hindu and Muslims are the two important religious groups. Muslims have so many sects and Hindu society is divided into many castes and sub-castes. Brahmans, kshatriya and Thakurs are upper castes, Kurmi, Yadav and Lodhis are considered as OBC's; Saini, Prajapati and Pal are MBC's while Jatav, Chamar, Pasi, Kori, and Dhobi are considered as scheduled castes. Different political parties try to manipulate these social cleavages and make sectarian appeal to mobilize voters. Congress has always been a dominant party in U.P, except a notable exception of 1977 U.P. Assembly Elections. Congress ruled U.P. for almost two decades after independence. It was known as an upper caste party as a result of upper caste domination. Congress was tactfully using caste politics to capture power. Rajni Kothari describe this as "Congress System". The election of 1967 greatly reduced Congress strength at the centre and in the states. From 1967 Congress support in the states steadily leaked away to the various regional parties. After 1967, there was first coalition era in U.P. state up to 1977. In this decade, congress remained a single largest party in the state except in 1977 when it could manage only 47 seats - lowest since independence. This decade was also marked by frequent elections i.e. mid-term elections and instability and it was believed that only Congress could give a stable government in the state, while other socialist parties and Jana Sangh could not deliver the result. The Grand Coalition : The Janata party could overthrow the congress but in 1980 Congress come back in power. From 1989 upto now, its position in the state is deteriorating. Decline of Congress resulted in the emergence of multiparty system in U.P. Before 1996, in three successive state Assembly Election 1989, 1991 and 1993, no single party was able to secure a majority, resulting in the formation of coalition Government. Instead of Congress, B.S.P., S.P. and B.J.P. were more powerful in the state. Not only these parties formed coalition in the state by uniting themselves, these could be characterized as a coalition of group interests representing a segment of the social community. The big size of the state, the existence of various castes and communities and other related problems such as communalism tends to divide society, and has turned sections of the masses towards a party which can represent their interest. Making only sectarian appeal these parties can win a large numbers of votes from their own targeted group. This however, leaves them short of a majority. The only viable solution remains a coalition government. In U.P., whether it was coalition between SP-BSP or BJP and BSP, it could not survive for a long period. Coalition government in the state. therefore, needs to tackle the problem of stability. In 1993, SP-BSP combine formed the coalition government in the state. Muslim, Dalits and OBC came together to defeat communal and upper caste parties. But this coalition could not survive because of ambitious strategies of SP and BSP. After the collapse of BSP-SP alliance Mayawati became Chief Minister of U.P. in June 1995 with an alliance with BJP. Major aim of this alliance was to control Mulayam Singh Yadav, whose increasing political influence both partners wished to curb. This BSP and BJP flirtation was characterized as opportunistic political strategy of both the partners. One major question which arose with this alliance was why BSP entered into an alliance with a Manuwadi party who was against Bahujanwad? BSP had always declared its opposition to all forms of Brahmanism. Coalition between two partners is not an easy affair but coalition with a partner who has a completely different ideology is entirely impossible for both the partners. Both tried to increase their influence at the cost of other. In U.P. the essence of coalition politics is opportunism and self interest. The main problem of coalition is that the interest of these actors in the coalition are not identical. Here coalition arrangements survive on negative agendas, like BJP aligned with BSP to stop SP from coming to power or in 1993, SP-BSP combined to stop BJP from coming to power. As these combines did not have identical interest, it result in breakup of coalitions, frequent President's rule and instability in the state. In U.P., caste is a factor of instability, violence and fractured verdict. It gave rise to multiparty system, impetus to regionalism. Mandalisation with anti-Mandal agitation and rise of lower castes on the political front. Earlier Congress had been a dominant party with a very weak factional opposition. Now congress is loosing its ground in U.P. and with the three other parties BJP, SP and BSP are building their base rapidly. In the fierce struggle for power from parties, no single party is able to gain majority and multiparty system is an established trend and is forcing parties to make unbelievable alliances. Caste politics is also making regionalism more prominent. Caste based parties can realize their potential largely at different regional levels. So, parties like SP and BSP can be seen as dominant parties in U.P. Parties also use one caste against other castes. Post Mandal politics in U.P. witnessed clashes between upper castes and OBCs on the one hand and lower castes opposition to OBCs on the other. Caste may be a secularizing force cutting across religious barriers but it gave rise to a different kind of struggle and violence in the state. Though dalits feel proud and have a sense of dignity but their upsurge is not a welcome move and they are subjected to fierce opposition in the state. Parties like BSP used caste politics as their 'natural right' opposing other castes openly and parties like BJP are heading for 'indirect dalitization', realizing its weak support base in the state, by making alliances with BSP. In 1989 elections Congress banked on its traditional Brahmin Harijan Muslim votes. BJP relied on its Hindutva politics with an eye on upper castes. Janata Dal appealed to OBCs Muslims, jats and Rajputs while BSP emerged solely as 'Dalit' party and raised its old slogan, Brahmin, Thakur, Bania Chor, Baki sab hain DS4 (Brahmin, Thakur and Banias are thieves and others belong to dalit shoshit sangharsh samiti). Implementation of Mandal commission Report sparked off a sharp polarization along caste lines in U.P. But it helped OBCs to rise as a political community. Mandal politics of Janata Dal was countered by Hindutva politics of BJP. BJP could emerge as the single largest party in 1993 Assembly election, it gained 178 seats with 33.3 per cent vote share but it could not form the government as it was short of about 37 seats to gain majority. It's Mandal vs Kamandal politics could not bring majority votes and victory of SP and BSP alliances was seen as victory of secular forces against Congress and BJP. In U,.P., competition between two national parties and: two state parties like SP and BSP show the growing resurgence of caste based parties. Now National parties like Congress and BJP are unable to dominate U.P. politics because of presence of state based parties like BSP and SP who have strong support of their own caste. It will not be wrong to say that caste based mobilization is a key feature of U.P. politics and seems to be an established one. One other major issue, which dominated U.P. politics since independence is communalism. From Bhartiya Jana Sangh to BJP an attempt has been witnessed in communalization of U.P. politics. In 1990, communalism was nurtured and promoted by the BJP in association with VHP, RSS and Bajrang Dal. BJP openly used communal politics to come in power. Shilaniyas at the disputed site in Ayodhya and then demolition of Babri masjid added fiiel to the fire. Violence, riots and insecurity was everywhere and BJP could become a success overnight. One of the major causes of communalism is no doubt political opportunism. Though congress has been tacitly using communal identities, but BJP, wholeheartedly declared itself a Hindu party, fighting for the Hindu cause, using ideologies such as Hinduva to win elections. Hindu nationalists target secular state and allege that 'pseudo-secularism' or 'appeasing minorities' is anti-democratic. They don't believe in equality. They promote a party which exploits religion for getting votes and asks people to respond to the call for Hindutva at the polls. This Hindu Right also condemns those parties who declare themselves secular and accuse them of promoting minority rights at the cost of majority. Hindu right maintains that every Indian must acknowledge that he or she belongs to Hindutva.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2019/05 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee Amory Gethin Thomas Piketty March 2019 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee, Amory Gethin, Thomas Piketty* January 16, 2019 Abstract This paper combines surveys, election results and social spending data to document the long-run evolution of political cleavages in India. From a dominant- party system featuring the Indian National Congress as the main actor of the mediation of political conflicts, Indian politics have gradually come to include a number of smaller regionalist parties and, more recently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These changes coincide with the rise of religious divisions and the persistence of strong caste-based cleavages, while education, income and occupation play little role (controlling for caste) in determining voters’ choices. We find no evidence that India’s new party system has been associated with changes in social policy. While BJP-led states are generally characterized by a smaller social sector, switching to a party representing upper castes or upper classes has no significant effect on social spending. We interpret this as evidence that voters seem to be less driven by straightforward economic interests than by sectarian interests and cultural priorities. In India, as in many Western democracies, political conflicts have become increasingly focused on identity and religious-ethnic conflicts
    [Show full text]
  • Jayaprakash Narayan: an Idealist Betrayed
    Jayaprakash Narayan: An Idealist Betrayed M.G. DEVASAHAYAM Jayaprakash Narayan addressing a public meeting at Sitabdiara during a visit to his village on November 5, 1977. Photo: The Hindu Archives. The imposition of the Emergency in June 1975 by Indira Gandhi led to a general uprising across the country under the leadership of Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP. It also brought together strange bedfellows—the socialists and the Jan Sangh, the political face of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). In this personal epitaph on Jayaprakash Narayan, former civil servant M.G. Devasahayam, who was "the only person who had unrestricted access" to the late JP when he was prisoner during the Emergency, explains how the JP movement fizzled out due to what he terms the "betrayal of the RSS". Prelude The150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi commenced on October 2, 2018 with all solemnity and is being celebrated across the country. October 2 has become an iconic date known to even kindergarten kids. October 11 is the 116th birth anniversary of Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP. If Mahatma Gandhi is the architect of India’s first freedom in 1947, which was extinguished by Congress supremo Indira Gandhi on 25/26 June, 1975, it was JP who got us our second freedom after defeating Emergency in 1977. While Gandhiji won it from a tottering alien rule, JP had to take on and defeat the might of an entrenched domestic despot with vast resources and armed with draconian Emergency powers, reminiscent of Stalinist regime. In gratitude, common people called him the Second Mahatma.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 706.12 Kb
    No. 139 2 March 2015 February 2015 – Trends Deteriorated situations Libya, Myanmar, Niger, Nigeria, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela, Yemen Improved situations March 2015 – Watchlist Conflict risk alerts Bangladesh, Yemen d Conflict resolution opportunities CrisisWatch summarises developments during the previous month in some 70 situations of current or potential conflict, listed alphabetically by region, providing references and links to more detailed sources. It assesses whether the overall situation in each case has, during the previous month, significantly deteriorated, significantly improved, or on balance re- mained more or less unchanged. It identifies situations where, in the coming month, there is a risk of new or significantly escalated conflict, or a conflict resolution opportunity (noting that in some instances there may be both). It also summarises Crisis Group’s reports and briefing papers published the previous month. Arrows and alerts: Up, down and side arrows signify, respectively, improved, deteriorated or unchanged situations. Con- flict Risk Alerts (identified with bombs) or Conflict Resolution Opportunities (with doves) are used in addition to arrows: a bomb signifies a risk of escalated violence; a dove an opportunity to advance peace. Both bombs and doves tend to be used where events are moving fast. Table of Contents AFRICA .................................................................................................................................. 3 Central Africa ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Indira Gandhi's India, 1975-1977
    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. Emerging from the Emergency: women in Indira Gandhi’s India, 1975-1977 Gemma Scott Doctor of Philosophy in History March 2018 Keele University Abstract India’s State of Emergency (1975-1977) is a critical period in the independent nation’s history. The government’s suspension of democratic norms and its institution of many, now infamous repressive measures have been the subject of much commentary. However, scholars have not examined Emergency politics from a gendered perspective. Women’s participation in support for and resistance to the regime and their experiences of its programmes are notably absent from historiography. This thesis addresses this gap and argues that a gendered perspective enhances our understanding of this critical period in India’s political history. It assesses the importance of gendered narratives and women to the regime’s dominant political discourses. I also analyse women’s experiences of Emergency measures, particularly the regime’s coercive sterilisation programme and use of preventive detention to repress dissent. I explore how gendered power relations and women’s status affected the implementation of these measures and people’s attempts to negotiate and resist them.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Emergency: Restoration and Resurgence (1977-1980) , Course- 203(II- SEM ,Category I)
    Post-Emergency: Restoration and Resurgence (1977-1980) , Course- 203(II- SEM ,Category I) 1 INTRODUCTION The 1977 was the historic year in the life of the Indian democracy: an attempt to legitimize authoritarian tendencies and personalization of state power through democratic elections was out rightly rejected by the voters; Indian National Congress’s monopoly to rule at the centre was ended; a non-Congress political formation for the first time came to power as Union government; fundamental rights and civil liberties of citizens and freedom of the print media suspended during the emergency were restored; endangered independence of higher judiciary was protected; and finally, democracy was saved and brought back to the proper political track. Additional to that, a demand for autonomy to the broadcast and telecast media got a boost. An attempt has been made to critically examine the role that the mass media played in the immediate post-Emergency democratic process of India, and also to analyze the contributions of the short lived Janata Government’s corrective as well as preventive constitutional and political measures in restoring, securing, and consolidating the democratic institutions and processes. A surprising as well as pleasant development were the pro-active role that the print media played in digging out the truth and in exposing the government machinery, party in power, and individuals with extra-constitutional authority who were responsible for either of abusing or of misusing of state power in the name of security of the state, preservation of social order and peace, and promotion of economic prosperity among the rural and urban poor and weaker sections of society.
    [Show full text]
  • National Political Parties MODULE - 4
    National Political Parties MODULE - 4 19 NATIONAL POLITICAL PARTIES Notes In the previous lessons you have read about the methods of representation and the electoral process. In this lesson you will study about political parties. Political parties exist in every democratic society and even in authoritarian systems. In a political system, parties act as the carrier of ideas, opinions and approaches to social needs and national goals. Parties provide a link between the citizens and the government, between the electorate and the representative institutions. In fact a successful democracy requires a healthy party-system for its sustenance. Political parties are instruments through which citizens choose those who constitute the government. They explain merits and dangers of alternate policies and provide political education to the citizens. Objectives After studying this lesson, you will be able to l recognise the importance of political parties; l identify the different types of party system; l recall the features of Indian party-system; l distinguish between national and regional parties; l describe the ideals and objectives of major national parties; l appreciate the role of these national parties in sustaining India’s democratic system. 19.1 Meaning and Role of Political Parties Human beings have always organised themselves in groups and larger formations. Political parties have emerged as one of these human organisations. In modern age the ideal form of government is run through one or the other method of representative institutions. All representative governments and representative institutions require the existence of political parties. A political party is an organised body of people who share certain common principles and goals regarding the political system of a country.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the 19N Parliamentary Elections in India
    Notes on the 19n Parliamentary Elections in India AJIT SINGH RYE End of an Era "The collective judgment of the people must be respected. My colleagues and I accept their verdict unreservedly and in a spirit of humility." With this statement, Indira Gandhi brought to a close a long era of Congress Party hegemony in Indian politics. Mrs. Gandhi and her controversial son Sanjay both suffered humiliating defeats at the polls. Popular resentment against the abuse of power during the Emergency was such that, in the home state of the Nehrus- Uttar Pradesh, the Congress Party did not even win a single seat. All 85 seats were won by the janata coalition. Similarly, in Bihar State, all 54 seats were won by Janata. Out of 542 seats in the Lower house, Congress won only 153; Janata and Congress for Democracy won 299. In fact all over north­ ern India-from Punjab to Assam-the Congress Party was virtually wiped out by the united opposition. In addition, more than two­ thirds of the Central Ministers in the Cabinet who contested the elec­ tions, including Mrs. Gandhi, were defeated. Congress was for the first time since 1946 forced into opposition in the Central Parliament. Many explanations have been advanced for the Congress rout at the polls. The most widely-held view is that Indira Gandhi and the Congress Party were defeated primarily because of their brazen misuse and abuse of power during the period of Emergency rule. Her Ajit Singh Rye is Associate Professor in Asian Politics at the Institute of Asian Studies, Philippine Center for Advance Studies, University of the Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Polity in Transition India After the 2004 General Elections
    Special articles Polity in Transition India after the 2004 General Elections The general elections of May 2004 in India saw the ousting of the National Democratic Alliance and the victory of a Congress-led coalition. Though Indian politics has since undergone a significant shift, with the Congress entering into power-sharing arrangements with smaller formations, an unusual situation at the apex finds corollary shifts in the base of the body politic. The ascendancy of ‘regional’ parties and the increasing electoral clout of marginal groups have been major developments. How these forces will govern in an era of economic reform will influence India’s future. Political and institutional challenges will continue to matter, but whether or not the Nehru-Gandhi clan can restore the fortunes of their party is still unclear. It will also be worth watching how the opposition re-groups and how far the ruling coalition resolves internal contradictions. MAHESH RANGARAJAN ew electoral outcomes have been as stunning as the victory most powerful office in the world’s most populous democracy. of a Congress-led coalition in the polls, called some weeks Personal origin had ceased to matter except to her most deter- Fin advance held in May 2004 in India. As it appears, the mined adversaries. Even turning down the office enhanced her wheel has turned but come to halt at the same place. As with prestige as someone who could have had power but chose instead Indira Gandhi in 1971 and Rajiv in 1984, a member of the Nehru to renounce it. The new prime minister has take care to evoke family still holds the key to power in New Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Governments in India: an Evaluation of United Progressive Alliance Government -1
    COALITION GOVERNMENTS IN INDIA: AN EVALUATION OF UNITED PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE GOVERNMENT -1 SUBMITT&O )N {^/tRTlACIULFILLMEN liREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF (i^i m ^ 3n » POLITICAL SCIENCE By AgM^ QAZI Under the Supervision of Dr. IFTEKHAR AHEMMED (ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR) DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AUGARH (INDIA) 2014 2 4 NCV 2014 DS4380 il Q © ® © ® e Dr. IFTEKHARAHEMMED Telephones: Associate Professor Chairman: 0571-2^01720 DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AMUPABX: 700916/7000920-21-22 Aligarh Muslim University Chairman: 1561 Aligarh - 202002 Office: 1560 <Date: •>^/ij_^l^^^9 Certificate '> . Tliis is io certify tHat^tHe (Dissertation *CoaQ.tion governments in India: Jin ^abuUion of Vnited (Progressive At^nce government - I" Sy !Wr. Mudam' Jifimad Qizi is the originaC researcd wor^ of the candidate, and is suitaMe for submission as the partiaCfidfittmentfor the award of the (Degree of Master of (PhUosophy in (PoCiticaCScienc^. ^i } tg O' /• yr-5S Dr. Iftekhar Ahemmed (Supervisor) DECLARATION I hereby declare that the dissertation "Coalition Governments in India: An Evaluation of United Progressive Alliance Government-I" submitted for the award of the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science is based on my original research work and the dissertation has not been presented for any other degree of this University or any other University or Institution and that all sources used in this work have been thoroughly acknowledged. Place: A w^ vJ /NUcv^^^ MudaHfAhmad Qazi Date: 9o | ) o | >o \<^
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties and Pressure Groups(1562
    MODULE - 3 Political Parties and Pressure Groups Democracy at Work 21 Notes POLITICAL PARTIES AND PRESSURE GROUPS You might have already read that democracy is a government of the people, for the people and by the people. A democratic government is considered a people’s government run by the people themselves. In practice in most of the countries the democratic governments are run by the representatives elected by the people. You might be thinking how the people get themselves represented in the government. People elect their representatives through the process of elections. In elections candidates generally are nominated by organizations known as political parties. Yes some of the candidates contest elections as independents also. However, participation of the people does not begin and end with elections only. People also participate in the process of governance through groups known as pressure groups or interest groups. In this lesson, we shall discuss political parties and pressure groups, especially in the context of our country. You will like to know more about political parties and pressure groups. OBJECTIVES After studying this lesson, you will be able to: z explain the meaning of a political party; z elaborate the main characteristics of political parties; z classify the types of political parties in India; z discuss the functions and role of political parties in a democratic government in India; z distinguish between national and regional political parties of India; z highlight briefly the major policies of national political parties; z differentiate between political parties and pressure/interest groups; 130 SOCIAL SCIENCE Political Parties and Pressure Groups MODULE - 3 Democracy at Work z assess the role of pressure/interest group; and z analyse the impact of political parties on our daily lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Full PDF
    Job Name:2102087 Date:14-12-30 PDF Page:2102087pbc.p1.pdf Color: Cyan Magenta Yellow Black The American Enterprise Institute f,or Public Policy Research, established in 1943, is a publicly supported, nonpartisan, research and educational organization. Its purpose is to assist policy makers, scholars, businessmen, fhe press, and the public by providing objective analysis of national and international issues. Views expressed in the institute's publications are those of the authors and do not neces­ sarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AE!. Council of Academic Advisers Paul W. McCracken, Chainnan, Edmund Ezra Day University Professor of Busi­ ness Ad111inistration, University of Michigan Kenneth W. Dam, Harold 7. and Marion F. Green Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School Milton Friedman, Paul Snowden Russell Distinguished Service Professor of Eco­ nOlnics, University of Chicago; Nobel Laureate in Economic Science Donald C. Hellmann, Professor of Political Science and Comparative and Foreign Area Studies, University of Washington D. Gale Johnson, Eliakim Hastings Moore Distinguished Service Professor of Econolnics and Provost, University of Chicago Robert A. Nisbet, Albert Schweitzer Professor of Humanities, Colun1bia University G. Warren Nutter, Paul Goodloe McIntire Professor of Econon1ics, University of Virginia Marina v. N. Whitman, Distinguished Public Service Professor of Economics, Uni­ versity of Pittsburgh James Q. Wilson, Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Govenl111ent, Harvard University Executive Committee fferman J. Schmidt, Chainnan of the Board Richard J. Farrell William J. Baroody, Jr., President Richard B. Madden Charles T. Fisher III, Treasurer Richard D. Wood Gary L. Jones/Vice President, Edward Styles, Director of Administration Pu bli catio'n s Program Directors Periodicals Russell Chapin, Legislative Analyses AEI Defense Review, Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition Politics and Role of Regional Parties in North India
    Volume-02 ISSN: 2455-3085 (Online) Issue-09 RESEARCH REVIEW International Journal of Multidisciplinary September-2017 www.rrjournals.com Coalition Politics and Role of Regional Parties in North India *Neelam Rani *Assistant Professor in Laws, GHG Institute of Law for Women, Sidhwan Khurd, Ludhiana (Punjab) Research Scholar at Panjab University, Chandigarh (India) ARTICLE DETAILS ABSTRACT Article History Democracy is considered as one of the best form of government because it ensure liberty of Received: 12 Sep 2017 thought, expression, belief, faith and worship, equality of status and opportunity, fraternity Accepted: 17 Sep 2017 as well as the right to participate in political decision making. It is a form of government Published Online: 19 Sep 2017 which is brought into existence by the people, of the people, for the people. One cannot Keywords ignore the role of Political parties at state as well as at regional level in the formation of Democracy government. The rise of regional parties has contributed to the break-down of the one-party Coalition Government dominant at the Centre and a total reversal of the authoritarian and centralized politics of Political Parties one part system in Indian politics. The new role of regional parties has transformed Indian Regional Parties federalism significantly. North India *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION to control the government and carry out their general policies”.3 “A coalition government is a combination of heterogeneous socio-political elements which are The rise of regional parties has contributed to the break- susceptible to political turmoil and storms emerging from down of the one-party dominant at the Centre and a total changing socio-political conditions and compulsions.”1 reversal of the authoritarian and centralized politics of one part system in Indian politics.
    [Show full text]