DOCSLIB.ORG

Origin and Growth of C in and Growth of Coalition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ss zz Available online at http://www.journalcra.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CURRENT RESEARCH International Journal of Current Research Vol. 13, Issue, 01, pp. 15762-15766, January, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24941/ijcr.40647.01.2021 ISSN: 0975-833X RESEARCH ARTICLE ORIGIN AND GROWTH OF COALITION POLITICS IN INDIA *1Tanveer Aziz Dar and 2Dr. S. Prabhakaran 1 2 M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Annamalai University ARTICLEAssistantINFO Professor, DepartmentABSTRACT of Political Science and Public Administration, Annamalai University Article History: The paper covets to draw attention to the origin and growth of coalition politics in India. The Received 08th October, 2020 manuscript wants to emphasize the fruition of coalition governments in India. The assessment of Received in revised form coalition politics and a scrutiny of how far coalition remains vivacious nevertheless stable. However 17th November, 2020 tough it is to make policy decisions once of ideologies forms the political government. Coalitions are Accepted 03rd December, 2020 shaped to avert a common enemy from the government and capturing the political power. Evenly Published online 30th January, 2021 fascinating is the reality a coalition devoid of ideological mornings survives till the rival is defeated. However manufacturing political adjustments, main beliefs may have to be set out-of-the-way and in Key Words: this course Ideology becomes the primarily to suffer. Once the election success is ended, differences Withdrawal, Union, Coalition, Government, come to the float up and the formation of coalitation collapses like a bunch of cards. On the basis of India, Alliance, Ideology, Partner. facts, history and research one has to admit India lives in affairs of state of Coalition. In general the piece of work also throughs light on the pros and cons of coalition politics. Copyright © 2021, Tanveer Aziz Dar and 2Dr. S. Prabhakaran. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Citation: Tanveer Aziz Dar and Dr. S. Prabhakaran. “How corona virus pandemic (covid -19) affect the teaching & training of dental institutions of India- a descriptive study”, International Journal of Current Research, 13, (01), 15762-15766. INTRODUCTION single party to realise a possible majority within the representative house(lower house) of the assembly. Coalition is a trend of a democratic multi-party system where a large number of parties unite for the purpose of Objectives operationalize the government which is or else not possible. A coalition is formed when many groups come into familiar In the current study, it is safe to say that coalition politics has conditions with each other and define a programme or agenda settled in Indian federal system. On a deeper analysis, it is on which they are planning to work. A coalition government reflective of a societal transformation; where a larger number forever remains in pulls and pressures mostly in a dynamic of hitherto covert groups of Indian society are getting socio-economic, multicultural and multinational country like mobilised and politicised. In the situation, once again, several factors need to be examined. In this aspect, this study focused India. The term “coalition” springs from the Latin word on the following: ‘coalition’ that means ‘to go’ or ‘grow together’. Therefore, it means that associate act of coalescing or uniting into one body or alliance. It indicates the mixture of variety of bodies or 1. To study the evolution of coalition politics in India. components into one body or whole. within the political sense 2. To examine the history of coalition politics in India. it is used to point out an agreement or impermanent union 3. To narrate the strength and challenges of coalition between numerous political groups for the control or exercise politics. of political power. Professor ogg defines coalition in the 4. How and why coalition politics became deciding factor in India. encyclopedia of social sciences, as “cooperative arrangements underneath distinct political parties or at all events members of such parties unite to create a ministry”. Thus, it may be METHODOLOGY believed that result of the exigencies of competitive multi- party system in a parliamentary type of democratic system is The present study makes an endeavor to look in the coalition coalition. It is a observable fact that where two or more government in origin of coalition politics in India. It is mainly political parties close to create a government, dipping their a fact finding study based on the exploratory method. This basic ideological variations within the event of the lack of any study is based on secondary sources of knowledge that includes Assembly debates, Manuals, Daily News Papers, *Corresponding author: Tanveer Aziz Dar, Periodicals, articles published in Journals and books etc. thus M.Phil. Scholar, Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Annamalai University this study is based on the Historical and descriptive approach. 15763 Tanveer Aziz Dar and Dr. S. Prabhakaran, Origin and growth of coalition politics in India International scenario of coalition politics: Coalitions are distinctive in the sense that in its place of providing choice to quite unusual in England and experiments have not proved to the Congress government it influences the factional groups be very victorious. That is why when faced with the within the Indian national Congress. These factional groups prospective coalition of Russell and Aberdeen in 1852, within ruling party played the character of opposition. The Disraeli declared: “England does not love coalition” in lack of unified opponent and appreciation to first- past- the- continental countries where there is a multi- party system, post voting system, the Indian national congress was coalitions are the rule not the exclusion. There have been competent to uphold its dominance. However it will be coalitions in Switzerland, France and Scandinavian countries. mistaken to believe that the Indian national Congress has According to Cambridge dictionary, coalition means “the dominated the whole nation in the first two decades joining together of different political parties or groups for a subsequent to independence. In 1952 state election assembly particular purpose, usually for a limited time, or a government the Indian national Congress won comprehensible majority in that is formed in this way”. According to ogg,”the term all the states except for PEPSU, Madras, Orissa and coalition as employed in political parties, or at all events Travancore-cochin but managed a clean majority in Rajasthan. members of such parties unite to form a government or Its opponent in Madras was saved by the partition to create ministry” new state of Andhra Pradesh, however, the Communists Party of India abases the Congress rule in November, 1954 and the Origin and Legacy of Coalition Politics in India: Coalition Presidents rule was imposed. The state assembly election was politics is not new observable fact in Indian political affairs. held in 1954 at Travancore-Cochin were coalition government India has a lot of diverse identity groups and these unique was shaped by Praja socialist party with the support of the groups had remained in union with one another since Congress. The Coalition government formed in Orissa by centuries. This social union is one of the major features of Gantantra Parishad and Congress in 1957 which survived till Indian society. The All Indian National Congress (INC) 1967. In Kerala from 1960-1964 coalition government became the driving force behind the national movement and dominated. It had been the coalition between Muslim league, reinforced the social coalition. India saw its first coalition Congress and PSP.'' In spite the Congress dominance coalition during election in 1937 between the Muslim League and All politics at state level was from the very inception. India National Congress (INC) through the Provincial governing body elections that was held underneath rules of the Indian national Congress divide and First Coalition at the 1935 Act. Prior to the independence Jawaharlal Nehru headed Centre (1967-1979): The Congress fiasco in the fourth the first political coalition rule in 1946. It was coalition general election fueled internal strife within the Indian between the All Indian National Congress, the Muslim League national congress. The Indian national Congress dominated by and the Hindu Mahasabha. Though, the exit of Muslim League syndicates became influential in the Congress Party decision from the Indian electoral system after independence making. In July 1969 at Bangalore session of AICC, marked strengthened the domination of the Congress Party. After the the indra Gandhi's move towards the Congress split as freedom the Indian national Congress dominated Indian intended to reassure her. She vividly spoke about radical electoral system both at the union as well as state level for at economic policies that upset the conventional group in the least twenty years through its intra-coalitional character. The Congress party. However the main causes of controversy appearance of multi-party coalition system in India today has between Mrs. Gandhi and syndicates were the filling its ancestry in the coalitional character of Congress Party. The nomination of the President of India. The Syndicates
Recommended publications
  • Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014

    Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014

    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2019/05 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee Amory Gethin Thomas Piketty March 2019 Growing Cleavages in India? Evidence from the Changing Structure of Electorates, 1962-2014 Abhijit Banerjee, Amory Gethin, Thomas Piketty* January 16, 2019 Abstract This paper combines surveys, election results and social spending data to document the long-run evolution of political cleavages in India. From a dominant- party system featuring the Indian National Congress as the main actor of the mediation of political conflicts, Indian politics have gradually come to include a number of smaller regionalist parties and, more recently, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These changes coincide with the rise of religious divisions and the persistence of strong caste-based cleavages, while education, income and occupation play little role (controlling for caste) in determining voters’ choices. We find no evidence that India’s new party system has been associated with changes in social policy. While BJP-led states are generally characterized by a smaller social sector, switching to a party representing upper castes or upper classes has no significant effect on social spending. We interpret this as evidence that voters seem to be less driven by straightforward economic interests than by sectarian interests and cultural priorities. In India, as in many Western democracies, political conflicts have become increasingly focused on identity and religious-ethnic conflicts
  • As on 13/02/2020]

    As on 13/02/2020]

    OFFICERS/OFFICIALS OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [AS ON 13/02/2020] S. No. Name Designation 1 Shri Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar Secretary General 2 Shri Surya Pratap Singh Registrar 3 Shri Anil Laxman Pansare Registrar 4 Shri P.K. Gera Registrar 5 Ms. Rita Chopra Registrar 6 Shri Rajesh Kumar Goel Registrar 7 Shri Avani Pal Singh Registrar 8 Shri Deepak Jain Registrar 9 Shri Pardeep Kumar Sharma Registrar 10 Shri H.K.Juneja Registrar 11 Shri Rajiv Kalra Registrar 12 Shri Sham Nagnathrao Joshi Officer on Special Duty 13 Shri B. Hari Officer on Special Duty 14 Shri Surinder S. Rathi Member[Processes], eCommittee 15 Ms. Seema Dua Additional Registrar 16 Shri B.L.N.Achary Additional Registrar 17 Ms. Kanchan Jain Additional Registrar 18 Shri Rakesh Kumar Additional Registrar 19 Shri Devender Pal Walia Additional Registrar 20 Ms. Madhu Arora Additional Registrar 21 Ms. Meena Sarin Additional Registrar 22 Shri Sunil Kumar Additional Registrar 23 Shri Harvinder singh Additional Registrar 24 Shri Mahesh Tanajirao Patankar Additional Registrar 25 Shri Vidhan Maheshwari Additional Registrar 26 Col. (Retd.) K.B.Marwaha Additional Registrar 27 Shri Ajay Agrawal Additional Registrar (Information & Statistics Officer) 28 Ms. Surabhi Prashar Additional Registrar 29 Shri Sanjeev Goyal Additional Registrar 30 Shri Yashwant Anand Goswami Additional Registrar 31 Shri Sushil Anuj Tyagi Additional Registrar 32 Shri Satish Kumar Arora Additional Registrar 33 Shri Badr-ul-Islam Officer on Special Duty 34 Shri Anand Singh Rawat Officer on Special Duty 35 Shri A. Ramesh Babu Member[Project Management], eCommittee 36 Shri Kuldeep Singh Kushwah Member[Systems], eCommittee 37 Shri Tauzeeh-Ul-Islam Rajput Deputy Registrar S.
  • General Elections, 1977 to the Sixth Lok Sabha

    General Elections, 1977 to the Sixth Lok Sabha

    STATISTICAL REPORT ON GENERAL ELECTIONS, 1977 TO THE SIXTH LOK SABHA VOLUME I (NATIONAL AND STATE ABSTRACTS & DETAILED RESULTS) ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA NEW DELHI ECI-GE77-LS (VOL. I) © Election Commision of India, 1978 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without prior and express permission in writing from Election Commision of India. First published 1978 Published by Election Commision of India, Nirvachan Sadan, Ashoka Road, New Delhi - 110 001. Computer Data Processing and Laser Printing of Reports by Statistics and Information System Division, Election Commision of India. Election Commission of India – General Elections, 1977 (6th LOK SABHA) STATISCAL REPORT – VOLUME I (National and State Abstracts & Detailed Results) CONTENTS SUBJECT Page No. Part – I 1. List of Participating Political Parties 1 - 2 2. Number and Types of Constituencies 3 3. Size of Electorate 4 4. Voter Turnout and Polling Station 5 5. Number of Candidates per Constituency 6 - 7 6. Number of Candidates and Forfeiture of Deposits 8 7. Candidates Data Summary 9 - 39 8. Electors Data Summary 40 - 70 9. List of Successful Candidates 71 - 84 10. Performance of National Parties vis-à-vis Others 85 11. Seats won by Parties in States / UT’s 86 - 88 12. Seats won in States / UT’s by Parties 89 - 92 13. Votes Polled by Parties – National Summary 93 - 95 14. Votes Polled by Parties in States / UT’s 96 - 102 15. Votes Polled in States / UT by Parties 103 - 109 16. Women’s Participation in Polls 110 17.
  • Jayaprakash Narayan: an Idealist Betrayed

    Jayaprakash Narayan: an Idealist Betrayed

    Jayaprakash Narayan: An Idealist Betrayed M.G. DEVASAHAYAM Jayaprakash Narayan addressing a public meeting at Sitabdiara during a visit to his village on November 5, 1977. Photo: The Hindu Archives. The imposition of the Emergency in June 1975 by Indira Gandhi led to a general uprising across the country under the leadership of Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP. It also brought together strange bedfellows—the socialists and the Jan Sangh, the political face of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). In this personal epitaph on Jayaprakash Narayan, former civil servant M.G. Devasahayam, who was "the only person who had unrestricted access" to the late JP when he was prisoner during the Emergency, explains how the JP movement fizzled out due to what he terms the "betrayal of the RSS". Prelude The150th birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi commenced on October 2, 2018 with all solemnity and is being celebrated across the country. October 2 has become an iconic date known to even kindergarten kids. October 11 is the 116th birth anniversary of Jayaprakash Narayan, popularly known as JP. If Mahatma Gandhi is the architect of India’s first freedom in 1947, which was extinguished by Congress supremo Indira Gandhi on 25/26 June, 1975, it was JP who got us our second freedom after defeating Emergency in 1977. While Gandhiji won it from a tottering alien rule, JP had to take on and defeat the might of an entrenched domestic despot with vast resources and armed with draconian Emergency powers, reminiscent of Stalinist regime. In gratitude, common people called him the Second Mahatma.
  • Annex I-A Notification

    Annex I-A Notification

    Annexes 179 ANNEX I-A No.F. 34/6/49-Public GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS New Delhi, the 16th May, 1949 NOTIFICATION The Governor General is pleased to announce the creation with immediate effect of a Department of Parliamentary Affairs under the Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs. This Department will take over from the Ministry of Law the work in connection with the functions of the Government Chief Whip and other Parliamentary Affairs. Sd: H.V.R. IENGER SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 180 Handbook on the Working of Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs ANNEX I-B ALLOCATION OF FUNCTIONS TO THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS 1. Dates of summoning and prorogation of the two Houses of Parliament: Dissolution of Lok Sabha, President’s Address to Parliament. 2. Planning and coordination of Legislative and other Official Business in both Houses. 3. Allocation of Government time in Parliament for discussion of Motions given notice of by Members. 4. Liaison with Leaders and Whips of various Parties and Groups represented in Parliament. 5. Lists of Members of Select and Joint Committees on Bills. 6. Appointment of Members of Parliament on Committees and other bodies set up by Government. 7. Functioning of Consultative Committees of Members of Parliament for various Ministries. 8. Implementation of assurances given by Ministers in Parliament. 9. Government’s stand on Private Members’ Bills and Resolutions. 10. Secretarial assistance to the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Affairs. 11. Advice to Ministries on procedural and other parliamentary matters. 12. Coordination of action by Ministries on the recommendations of general application made by parliamentary committees.
  • Boctor Oc $Fitlofi(Opf)}>

    Boctor Oc $Fitlofi(Opf)}>

    STATE ELECTIONS: A STUDY OF 1996 ASSEMBLY ELECTION IN UP ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Boctor oC $fitlofi(opf)}> IN POLITICAL SCIENCE BY SAN]EDA WARSI UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF Prof. M. ASMER BEG DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2008 ABSTRACT Uttar Pradesh, a relatively backward state, has been important in India's politics since independence. It has always played a decisive role in the formation of the government at the centre as it used to have 85 lok sabha seats. It is India's fifth largest state with basically an agrarian society. After independence, leaders tried to politicize these peasants and convert them in their vote bank. Rich peasants from upper castes dominated U.P. politics for a long period. Uttar Pradesh has a heterogeneous society which' is divided into different castes and communities. Hindu and Muslims are the two important religious groups. Muslims have so many sects and Hindu society is divided into many castes and sub-castes. Brahmans, kshatriya and Thakurs are upper castes, Kurmi, Yadav and Lodhis are considered as OBC's; Saini, Prajapati and Pal are MBC's while Jatav, Chamar, Pasi, Kori, and Dhobi are considered as scheduled castes. Different political parties try to manipulate these social cleavages and make sectarian appeal to mobilize voters. Congress has always been a dominant party in U.P, except a notable exception of 1977 U.P. Assembly Elections. Congress ruled U.P. for almost two decades after independence. It was known as an upper caste party as a result of upper caste domination.
  • Pdf | 706.12 Kb

    Pdf | 706.12 Kb

    No. 139 2 March 2015 February 2015 – Trends Deteriorated situations Libya, Myanmar, Niger, Nigeria, Syria, Ukraine, Venezuela, Yemen Improved situations March 2015 – Watchlist Conflict risk alerts Bangladesh, Yemen d Conflict resolution opportunities CrisisWatch summarises developments during the previous month in some 70 situations of current or potential conflict, listed alphabetically by region, providing references and links to more detailed sources. It assesses whether the overall situation in each case has, during the previous month, significantly deteriorated, significantly improved, or on balance re- mained more or less unchanged. It identifies situations where, in the coming month, there is a risk of new or significantly escalated conflict, or a conflict resolution opportunity (noting that in some instances there may be both). It also summarises Crisis Group’s reports and briefing papers published the previous month. Arrows and alerts: Up, down and side arrows signify, respectively, improved, deteriorated or unchanged situations. Con- flict Risk Alerts (identified with bombs) or Conflict Resolution Opportunities (with doves) are used in addition to arrows: a bomb signifies a risk of escalated violence; a dove an opportunity to advance peace. Both bombs and doves tend to be used where events are moving fast. Table of Contents AFRICA .................................................................................................................................. 3 Central Africa ................................................................................................................
  • The State Bank of India (Amendment) Bill, 1959

    The State Bank of India (Amendment) Bill, 1959

    C. B. :II) No. 87 LOK SABHA THE STATE BANK OF INDIA (AMENDMENT) BILL, 1959 (Report of the Joint Committee) PRESENTED ON 1HE 3rd AUGUST, 1959 LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI August, 1959. P?"ice : o ·55 nP. l'Aons 1. Composition of the Joint Committee i·li 2. Report of the Joint Committee iii-i'l 3· Minute of Dissent v 4· Bill as amended by the Joint Committe< Al'PBNDllt !- Motion in the Lok Sabha for reference of the Bill to Joint Commitlee APP8ND!X II- Motion in the Rajya Sabha APPIINDIX II I- Minutes of the Sittina;s of the Joint Committee n-zo (ii) 27. 5hri Subiman Ghose 28. Shri Laisi'am Achaw Singh 29. Shri Balasaheb Salunke 30. Shri Morarji Desai. Rajya Sabha 31. Shri K. P. Madhavan Nair 32. Shri Tika Ram Paliwal 33. Shri Jaspat Roy Kapoor 34. Shrimati Pushpalata Das 35. Shri Jadavji Keshavji Modi 36. Dr. Anup Singh 37. Shri N. M. Lingam 38. Syed Mazhar Imam 39. Shri Jagannath Prasad Agrowal 40. Shri Niranjan Singh 41. Shri P. Narayanan Singh 42. Shri Harihar Patel 43. Shri Mulka Govinda Reddy 44. Dr. P. J. Thomas 45. Dr. B. Gopala Reddi DIIAFTSMElN Shri S. K. Hiranandani, Joint Secretary and Draftsman, Ministry of Law. Shri V. N. Bhatia, Deputy Draftsman, Ministry of Law. SECRETAIUAT Shri S. L. Shakdher-Joint Secretary. Shri A. L. Rai-Under Secretary. Report of the Joint Committee I, the Chairman of the Joint Committee to which the "Bill further to amend the State Bank of India Act, 1935, was referred, having been authorised to submit the Report on their behalf, present their Report with the Bill as amended by the Committee annexed thereto.
  • A Life of Truth in Politics LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI

    A Life of Truth in Politics LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI

    jot OXFORD INDIA PAPERBACKS A life of truth in politics LAL BAHADUR SHASTRI A Life of Truth in Politics C. P. SRIVASTAVA DELHI OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS Acknowledgements have gathered documentary material and photographs for this bio­ graphy from a number of libraries and institutions. To all of them, particularly the following, I wish to express my profound gratitude: INehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi: Professor Ravinder Kumar, director. Dr Mari DcvSharma, deputy director, and librarian and staff. The library of the Ministry of Informat ion and Broadcasting, Govern­ ment of India, New Delhi: the librarian and staff of the library. All India Radio, New Delhi: the director-general and his staff. The Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi: Dr V.A. Pai Panandiker, director, and his staff. The Servants of the People Society, New Delhi: Shri Satya Pal. The Hindustan Times, New Delhi: I have quoted extensively from this newspaper and am deeply gratcftil also to Mr N. Thiagarajan, former chief photographer, Hindustan Times Group, who has provided the cover photograph and other photographs. The Films Division, Government of India, Bombay, the director and his staff. The Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, Austin, Texas, USA: David Humphrey, supervising archivist; John Wilson, ar­ chivist; Irene Parra, archivist; Linda Hanson, archivist; Regina Greenwell, archivist; Claudia Anderson, archivist; and Jeremy Duval, staff member. Yale University Library, Connecticut, USA: the librarian and staff of the library. The British Library, London: the librarian and staff of the library. The British Library, Newspaper Library, Colindalc, London: the librarian and staff of the library.
  • GOVERNMENT REBUKED That Such Misleading Maps Had • ONLOOKER '

    GOVERNMENT REBUKED That Such Misleading Maps Had • ONLOOKER '

    , 26 SWARAJYA II August 22, 1970 .' I FROM THE GALLERY: ParlIament on ~uch an issue. Sri Prakash Vir Shastri (BKD) said RUSSIA'S MAPS: GOVERNMENT REBUKED that such misleading maps had • ONLOOKER '. been published in the past also, and India suffered on that account NEW DELHI, August 11: The up till the calling attention motion when the Colo~bo proposals were Opposition scored a major point was disposed of. Opposition made. They ,Idid not want the against the Government this week members from all non-communist same thing to happen again. when all the parties, except the parties pleaded strongly for ad­ Achatya Ra~ga said: "In the Communists, walked out in protest mission of the adjournment light of what Jas explained in the on the issue of the Soviet official motion, as. their intention was to other House, ,ye felt that no use-' maps showing large areas of censure the Government. When ful purpose w~?uld be served by a Indian territory as Chinese. The the Speaker did not accept the calling . attentionII motion. All these Government made a poor show. plea, they walked out. The Con­ years, and particularly during The statement by the Foreign gress (0), Swatantra, Jan Sangh, recent months: the Government Minister was mild, and even Rajya SSP, PSP and Independents all has not stoodl! up in the manner Sabha Members, who generally jOined the protest walk-out, which we expected it to do for the in­ give a patient hearing to Minis­ registered the indignation of a terests, honour, integrity and dig­ ters, found it difficult to put up very large section of the House.
  • Women in Indira Gandhi's India, 1975-1977

    Women in Indira Gandhi's India, 1975-1977

    This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights and duplication or sale of all or part is not permitted, except that material may be duplicated by you for research, private study, criticism/review or educational purposes. Electronic or print copies are for your own personal, non- commercial use and shall not be passed to any other individual. No quotation may be published without proper acknowledgement. For any other use, or to quote extensively from the work, permission must be obtained from the copyright holder/s. Emerging from the Emergency: women in Indira Gandhi’s India, 1975-1977 Gemma Scott Doctor of Philosophy in History March 2018 Keele University Abstract India’s State of Emergency (1975-1977) is a critical period in the independent nation’s history. The government’s suspension of democratic norms and its institution of many, now infamous repressive measures have been the subject of much commentary. However, scholars have not examined Emergency politics from a gendered perspective. Women’s participation in support for and resistance to the regime and their experiences of its programmes are notably absent from historiography. This thesis addresses this gap and argues that a gendered perspective enhances our understanding of this critical period in India’s political history. It assesses the importance of gendered narratives and women to the regime’s dominant political discourses. I also analyse women’s experiences of Emergency measures, particularly the regime’s coercive sterilisation programme and use of preventive detention to repress dissent. I explore how gendered power relations and women’s status affected the implementation of these measures and people’s attempts to negotiate and resist them.
  • Fnukad 07-07-14 Ls Fjdr Vk;Qoszn Qkekzfllv Ds Inksa Ds Fy, Vk;Ksftr Gksus Okyh Dkmflfyax Gsrq Vgz Vh;Ffkz;Ksa Dh Lwph

    Fnukad 07-07-14 Ls Fjdr Vk;Qoszn Qkekzfllv Ds Inksa Ds Fy, Vk;Ksftr Gksus Okyh Dkmflfyax Gsrq Vgz Vh;Ffkz;Ksa Dh Lwph

    fnukad 07-07-14 ls fjDr vk;qosZn QkekZflLV ds inksa ds fy, vk;ksftr gksus okyh dkmflfyax gsrq vgZ vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lwph Date of Registration Batch Suplim- Aggrigrate Percentage SL.NO. Name of Candidate Father's/Husband's Name Birth Year Year entary. Marks (%) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 SABHAPATI SHEETLA PRASAD 08.08.60 1984 1980 1 826 45.89 2 KAMLA PD. SINGH LATE PATI RAJ SINGH 25.01.57 1998 1982 723 60.25 3 RAISUL HAQUE SIDDQUI ALTAF HUSAIN 30.01.62 1986 1983 4 644 53.67 4 RAJENDRA PRASAD BRIJ BHUSAN PANDEY 01.10.58 1986 1983 5 625 52.08 5 LALIT MOHAN SRIVASTAVA JAGNNATH LAL 14.06.58 1985 1983 4 617 51.42 6 TRIBHUAN NARAYAN PANDEY RAMA KANT PANDEY 25.02.66 1985 1985 700 58.33 7 BHAIRAW SINGH LATE MANNI SINGH 01.01.63 1986 1985 1 652 54.33 8 MUNI PRASAD SAHEB DIN 15.09.65 1987 1985 2 628 52.33 9 BAL MUKUND SHUKLA TILAK DHARI SHUKLA 01.02.64 1987 1986 1 793 66.08 10 PREM CHANDRA GUPTA GANPATI PD. GUPTA 01.08.62 1987 1986 1 744 62.00 11 ISHWAR DEV MISHRA RAM NAYAK MISHRA 07.05.65 1987 1986 2 710 59.17 12 ANIL KR. TRIPATHI CHANDRA PRAKASH TRIPATHI 29.12.63 1988 1986 2 705 58.75 13 RAM NARESH SINGH SRI KRISHN 20.03.67 1987 1986 3 699 58.25 14 OM PRAKASH YADAV LATE RAM NAYAN YADAV 12.02.65 1987 1986 2 698 58.17 15 RAM KARAN RAM LATE SAKKHAN RAM 05.01.66 1987 1986 1 698 58.17 16 ASHOK KR.