DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 112 of the Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Attachment Page 1 of 15 Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 Section 112 Surface Transportation Projects (March 22, 2006) Obligation Authority Designated Amounts Amount available after Program Code LY60 Allocation Project Description in Statement of Managers This Memorandum (DELPHI Code State Demo ID in Conf.Rep. 1 percent rescission This Memorandum Conference Report 109-307 15X043P000-050) H.R. 109-307 Project State Total Project State Total Project State Total Alabama AL167 Airport Road Expansion, Phase II, Jasper, AL 1,830,000 1,811,700 1,811,700 1,811,700 Alabama AL168 Baldwin County Highway 83 Evacuation Route Project, AL 850,000 841,500 841,500 841,500 Alabama AL169 City of Selma Water Avenue Streetscape Improvement, AL 400,000 396,000 396,000 396,000 Alabama AL170 County Road 19 Improvements, Cherokee County, AL 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 Alabama AL171 Downtown Multimodal Parking System, Huntsville, AL 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 Expansion of access and parking adjacent to Post Office, City of Alabama AL172 Jacksonville, AL 110,000 108,900 108,900 108,900 Alabama AL173 Expansion of Highway 431, Town of Roanoke, AL 150,000 148,500 148,500 148,500 Alabama AL174 Extend I-759 East to US Highway 278, Gadsden, AL 2,800,000 2,772,000 2,772,000 2,772,000 Alabama AL175 Highway 21 extension, Talladega, AL 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 Alabama AL176 Third Avenue resurfacing Project, Ranburne, AL 40,000 39,600 39,600 39,600 University of South Alabama Transportation Technology Center, Alabama AL177 AL 10,000,000 9,900,000 9,900,000 9,900,000 Alabama 17,998,200 17,998,200 17,998,200 Alaska AK164 Culvert Replacement on Roads, AK 750,000 742,500 742,500 742,500 Alaska AK165 Keystone Drive Reconstruction and Upgrade, AK 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 Alaska AK166 Rural dock and waterfront development projects, AK 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Alaska AK167 Tanana River Bridge Replacement, AK 3,000,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 Alaska AK168 Walden Point Road, AK 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 Alaska 7,672,500 7,672,500 7,672,500 Arizona AZ068 Bird Springs Road/Bridge Rehabilitation, AZ 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Arizona AZ069 Issac Middle School Pedestrian Bridge, AZ 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 Arizona AZ070 Tucson Wash Crossings Improvements, AZ 100,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 Arizona AZ071 University of Arizona Science Center Bridge, AZ 3,500,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 3,465,000 Arizona AZ072 Widen SR 86--Sells, AZ 650,000 643,500 643,500 643,500 Arizona 6,880,500 6,880,500 6,880,500 Arkansas AR128 Highway 412 Mountain Home to Ash Flat, AR 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 Arkansas AR129 Highway 63: Interstate 55-Jonesboro, AR 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Arkansas AR130 Highway 71: Texarkana--DeQueen, AR 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Arkansas AR131 Highway 77 Rail Grade Separation, Marion, AR 350,000 346,500 346,500 346,500 Arkansas AR132 Interstate 40/Highways 25/64 Interchange, AR 750,000 742,500 742,500 742,500 Arkansas 5,742,000 5,742,000 5,742,000 California CA755 Alameda Corridor-East, San Gabriel Valley, CA 4,200,000 4,158,000 4,158,000 4,158,000 California CA756 Bristol Street Multi-Modal Corridor, CA 600,000 594,000 594,000 594,000 California CA757 Burbank/Sepulveda Boulevards Intersection Improvements, CA 200,000 198,000 198,000 198,000 California CA758 City of Lawndale Street Improvements, CA 850,000 841,500 841,500 841,500 California CA759 City of Santa Fe Springs, Los Angeles County, CA 800,000 792,000 792,000 792,000 California CA760 City of Santa Monica ITS Improvements, CA 350,000 346,500 346,500 346,500 California CA761 Cross Valley Connector, Santa Clarita, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 California CA762 Dublin Boulevard and Dougherty, City of Dublin, CA 300,000 297,000 297,000 297,000 California CA763 Essential road improvements, Desert Hot Springs, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 Flamingo Road Reconstruction, Laguna Beach, CA (including roadbed reconstruction and stabilization, and hillside stabilization, clarified per Jan 12, 2006 clarification letter) Valley Transportation California CA764 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Authority for the Blossum Hill and Monterey Highway Pedestrian Crossing, San Jose, CA (activities must be title 23 or 49 eligible) (original description revised per May 12, 2006 clarification letter) California CA765 Fort Bragg Bike Path, CA 750,000 742,500 742,500 742,500 FY 2006 Section 112 Project Allocations - States - March 22, 2006 Attachment Page 2 of 15 Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 Section 112 Surface Transportation Projects (March 22, 2006) Obligation Authority Designated Amounts Amount available after Program Code LY60 Allocation Project Description in Statement of Managers This Memorandum (DELPHI Code State Demo ID in Conf.Rep. 1 percent rescission This Memorandum Conference Report 109-307 15X043P000-050) H.R. 109-307 Project State Total Project State Total Project State Total California CA766 Fourth Street Bridge, San Francisco, CA 1,500,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 California CA767 Fresno State Route 41 Off ramp Improvements, CA 1,500,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 California CA768 Guaranteed Ride Home Prog. Santa Clara County, CA 300,000 297,000 297,000 297,000 California CA769 I-15 (Falchion Rd)/SR 18 Interchange, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 California CA770 I-40/Arizona 95 Interconnect, Needles, CA 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 California CA771 I-5 Sorrento Valley/Genesee Avenue, San Diego, CA 600,000 594,000 594,000 594,000 California CA772 Intelligent Transportation System, Ventura County, CA 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 California CA773 Lincoln Bypass, CA 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 California CA774 Marin Novato Narrows Highway 101 Corridor Widening, CA 850,000 841,500 841,500 841,500 California CA775 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 California CA776 Mountain Avenue Duarte Road Realignment, Duarte, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 California CA777 Myrtle Avenue Streetscape Project, Monrovia, CA 100,000 99,000 99,000 99,000 North County 1-5 interchanges and Arch Sperry Road, San California CA778 Joaquin County, CA 3,000,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 California CA779 Palmer Canyon Road Improvements, Los Angeles County, CA 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 California CA780 Park Street Streetscape Improvements, Alameda, CA 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 California CA781 Port of Stockton, Daggett Road, Stockton, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 Ranch Vista Boulevard widening project, Palmdale, CA Rancho California CA782 Vista Boulevard widening project, Palmdale, CA (original 545,000 539,550 539,550 539,550 description revised per Jan 12, 2006 clarification letter) California CA783 Ranchero Road Grade Separation, Hesperia, CA 3,000,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 California CA784 Ravenswood Road Improvement Project, East Palo Alto, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 California CA785 Sacramento Buses and Bus Facilities, CA 250,000 247,500 247,500 247,500 California CA786 San Francisco 19th Avenue Improvements, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 California CA787 School Pedestrian Safety, Alameda County, CA 650,000 643,500 643,500 643,500 California CA788 SCRRA Highway/Rail Sealed Corridor Program, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 California CA789 Sierra College Boulevard/I-80 Interchange, Rocklin, CA 300,000 297,000 297,000 297,000 Southern California High Speed Rail Grade Crossing Improvements, CA Southern California Regional Rail Authority's California CA790 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 Metrolink alignments (original description revised per Jan 12, 2006 clarification letter) California CA791 SR 4 widening and bridge replacement, Brentwood, CA 200,000 198,000 198,000 198,000 California CA792 SR-56/I-5 Northbound Widening Project, San Diego, CA 400,000 396,000 396,000 396,000 California CA793 SR-91 Chokepoint Elimination in Corona, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 California CA794 State Route 79 Realignment, Riverside County, CA 700,000 693,000 693,000 693,000 California CA795 Tower Bridge Pedestrian/Bike Improvements, CA 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 California CA796 UP/Sunset Avenue Grade Separation Banning, CA 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 California 39,347,550 39,347,550 39,347,550 Colorado CO114 56th Avenue/Quebec Improvements, Denver, CO 2,800,000 2,772,000 2,772,000 2,772,000 Colorado CO115 City of Thornton, Grade Separation Improvements, CO 500,000 495,000 495,000 495,000 Colorado CO116 Colorado Boulevard Connector, CO 2,000,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 1,980,000 I-76 Corridor Improvements from Ft. Morgan to Nebraska state Colorado CO117 line, CO 1,600,000 1,584,000 1,584,000 1,584,000 Colorado CO118 Ports to Plains, US 287 Corridor, CO 3,000,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 2,970,000 Colorado CO119 Rio Grande Bike Trail, Garfield County, CO 1,000,000 990,000 990,000 990,000 Colorado CO120 US 287 Corridor construction and repaving, CO 2,400,000 2,376,000 2,376,000 2,376,000 Colorado CO121 Wadsworth Interchange/State Highway 128, CO 1,500,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 1,485,000 Colorado 14,652,000 14,652,000 14,652,000 FY 2006 Section 112 Project Allocations - States - March 22, 2006 Attachment Page 3 of 15 Transportation, Treasury, Housing and Urban Development, the Judiciary, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006 Section 112 Surface Transportation Projects (March 22, 2006) Obligation Authority Designated Amounts Amount available after Program Code LY60 Allocation Project Description in Statement of Managers This Memorandum (DELPHI Code State Demo ID in Conf.Rep.
Recommended publications
  • Current Weitz Iowa Office Building 5901 Thornton Avenue | Des Moines, Iowa

    Current Weitz Iowa Office Building 5901 Thornton Avenue | Des Moines, Iowa

    CURRENT WEITZ IOWA OFFICE BUILDING 5901 THORNTON AVENUE | DES MOINES, IOWA FOR SALE PROPERTY INFORMATION CBRE|Hubbell Commercial is pleased to offer for sale this 26,199 SF free-standing single-story office building overlooking downtown Des Moines. Currently home to Weitz Iowa who will be vacating the building in the spring of 2022, the property is minutes away from the central business district, Des Moines International Airport, historic Valley Junction, Freeway/Interstate 235 and the Highway 5 bypass. Building features Class A finishes and current décor with ample offices, meeting rooms, and space for free standing office furniture. Great opportunity for owner user or future investment property. Sale Price: $3,000,000 Available Space: 26,199 SF; 3.011 Acres Building Features: • One story tilt-up concrete building • Built in 2000 • Modern/current décor and finishes • Veranda overlooking downtown Des Moines & Raccoon River Valley • Ample parking • Area for future development • Priced below replacement value • Centrally located in Des Moines for employee base • Efficient building design 2 AERIAL VIEW 63RD ST 5901 THORNTON AVE PARK AVENUE S 1ST ST 3 SW 56TH STREET 4 5901 THORNTON AVE SW MCKINLEY AVE 2 1 Hwy 5 Bypass 2 Des Moines Internation Airport 1 3 Downtown Des Moines/East Village 4 Historical Valley Junction 3 BUILDING DESCRIPTION Total Building Square Feet: 26,199 SF Year Built 2000, Addition in 2005 (6,205 SF) Construction: Concrete block and tilt up concrete, metal frame Foundation: Concrete on grade Sprinkler System: Wet Roof: Rubber Membrane Lighting: Mixture Parking 101 Parking Stalls (3.8/1,000) Security: Security Card Access Signage: Monument Sign HVAC: Roof mounted forced air Other Features: Outdoor patio Zoning - Planned Unit Development 4 FLOOR PLAN 5 INTERIOR PHOTOS 6 INTERIOR PHOTOS 7 AERIAL VIEW OUTDOOR PATIO 8 EXTERIOR PHOTOS 9 MARKET INFORMATION Des Moines is centrally located at the intersection of Interstates 80 and 35, within several hours of driving distance of Omaha, Minneapolis and Kansas City and within a 5 ½ hour drive of Chicago, St.
  • I-69 Implementation Strategy and Update Report

    I-69 Implementation Strategy and Update Report

    I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report February 2018 Transportation Planning and Programming Division Report Revision History The following table tracks revisions and changes made to this report over time. Date Revision Explanation March 2016 First edition of the report February 2018 • Updates Statewide and District Summaries based on fiscal year (FY) 2018 Unified Transportation Program (UTP) and its December 2017 revision as well as TxDOT’s other internal planning and programming systems as of January 3, 2018 • Includes Advisory Committee $2B project prioritization exercise results I-69 Implementation Strategy Update Report – February 2018 ii Table of Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................................... iv List of Acronyms ......................................................................................................................... v Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 I-69 System ............................................................................................................................... 1 Importance of the I-69 System to Texas ........................................................................ 3 I-69 System Project Prioritization ............................................................................................. 6 I-69 System Implementation Strategy Update .....................................................................
  • Ordinance 14335

    Ordinance 14335

    ORDINANCE NO. 14,335 AN ORDINANCE to amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, set forth in Section 134-277 of the Municipal Code of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, 2000, by rezoning and changing the district classification of certain property located in the area generally bounded by Interstate 235 on the north, Des Moines Street on the south, E. 4th Street on the east, and Robert D Ray Drive on the west, from the "M-1" Light Industrial District to the "D-R" Downtown Riverfront District classification. Be It Ordained by the City Council of the City of Des Moines, Iowa: Section 1. That the Official Zoning Map of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, set forth in Section 134-277 of the Municipal Code of the City of Des Moines, Iowa, 2000, be and the same is hereby amended by rezoning and changing the district classification of certain property located in the area generally bounded by Interstate 235 on the north, Des Moines Street on the south, E. 4th Street on the east, and Robert D Ray Drive on the west, and more fully described as follows, from the "M-1" Light Industrial District to the "D-R" Downtown Riverfront District classification: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Lot 1, River Hills Plat No. 7, an Official Plat; thence South along the East line of said Lot 1, to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, and being on the East right-of-way line of East 4th Street; thence southwesterly to the West right-of-way line of East 4th Street and the East line of Lot 12 of said River Hills No.
  • I-69 Implementation Strategy Report – March 2016 Ii

    I-69 Implementation Strategy Report – March 2016 Ii

    I-69 Implementation Strategy Report March 2016 Transportation Planning and Programming Division Table of Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................ iv I-69 System Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 Importance of the I-69 System to Texas ........................................................................ 1 I-69 System Progress ....................................................................................................... 5 I-69 Implementation Strategy .................................................................................................. 6 Development .................................................................................................................... 7 Components ..................................................................................................................... 9 Next Steps - How the Implementation Strategy Will Be Used ..................................... 11 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 12 I-69 Implementation Strategy Summary Information and Data .......................................... 13 Tables Table 1. I-69 System Activities Since September
  • Table of Contents Agenda 4 III-1. Appeal of Historic

    Table of Contents Agenda 4 III-1. Appeal of Historic

    Table of Contents Agenda 4 III-1. Appeal of Historic Preservation Board Denial of Demolition of McClinton Grocery Store, 1201 E. 12th Street. (District I) Agenda Report No. III-1 12 Historic Preservation Board Denial Appeal Background Information 13 III-2. 2015 State Legislative Agenda. Agenda Report No. III-2 18 Power Point 19 IV-1. Request for Letter of Intent for Industrial Revenue Bonds, TCRS, LLC. (District IV) Agenda Report No. IV-1 43 TCRS, LLC IRB Application 45 Resolution No. 14-374 51 IV-2. Amended and Restated Development Agreement - River Vista, L.L.C, West Bank Apartments, Amended TIF Project Plan, Amended River District STAR Bond Project Plan and Creation of River Vista Village Community Improvement District. (District VI) Agenda Report No. IV- 2 55 AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (CLEAN) (12-11-14) 60 Amended TIF Project Plan Description West Bank apts 7-10-2014 134 The Riv Pay Request 161 Signed River Vista SA Petitions 12-5-2014 163 Ordinance No. 49-914 CID 166 Ordinance No. 49-915 Project Plan Amend 171 Ordinance No. 49-916 Star Project Plan Amend 176 Ordinance No. 49-917 186 Resolution No. 14-371 191 IV-3. 2015 Contract Renewal with Go Wichita Convention and Visitors Bureau. Agenda Report No. IV-3 193 Exhibit B Final 112414 196 Exhibit C 2015 Contingency Sponsorships 203 Go Wichita Contract 2015 red lined 111414 v3a w changes accepted 204 IV-4. Operating Partnership Agreement with The Wichita Art Museum, Inc. Agenda Report No. IV-4 213 WAM - Third Supplemental Agreement for Operation Mgmt 11 18 14 (00932335-2x7FED2) 215 IV-5.
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries

    Oklahoma Statutes Title 69. Roads, Bridges, and Ferries

    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 69. ROADS, BRIDGES, AND FERRIES §69-101. Declaration of legislative intent.............................................................................................19 §69-113a. Successful bidders - Return of executed contract................................................................20 §69-201. Definitions of words and phrases..........................................................................................21 §69-202. Abandonment........................................................................................................................21 §69-203. Acquisition or taking..............................................................................................................21 §69-204. Arterial highway.....................................................................................................................21 §69-205. Authority................................................................................................................................21 §69-206. Auxiliary service highway.......................................................................................................21 §69-207. Board......................................................................................................................................21 §69-208. Bureau of Public Roads..........................................................................................................21 §69-209. Commission............................................................................................................................21
  • Regional Context

    Regional Context

    August 2007 REGIONAL CONTEXT Regional Transportation System Defining Regional Context The purpose of this task was to identify and summarize community specific and regional needs within and adjacent to the influence area. The recent update to the Wichita area’s Long Range Transportation Plan was a starting point with its identification of development trends and potential future transportation projects as well as its information on commuting patterns and trends, freight flows and use of all modes of transportation. The needs may include access to recreation/natural areas, development potential, and travel efficiency. System continuity at both a regional and local level was reviewed, including limited opportunities for east-west travel crossing the Wichita Valley Center Floodway commonly referred to as the “Big Ditch”. The system needs will take into account the Kansas Department of Transportation’s (KDOT) existing and proposed roadway system, including the Northwest Bypass, potential transportation improvements to be defined through the on-going South Area Transportation Study as well as any improvements completed or proposed by City or County offices. Access to regionally significant land uses in the immediate vicinity were considered including Towne West Mall, Mid-Continent Airport, Dugan Business area and several aviation manufacturers. The MPO planning area, Sedgwick County, and the Wichita Metropolitan Statistical Area, each of which has a unique boundary, are referenced in the following sections of this report. WAMPO LRTP Goals and Objectives The 2030 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) is guided by a set of goals, objectives and strategies that were recommended by the LRTP Advisory Committee and approved by the Wichita Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (WAMPO).
  • I-69 Final Eis Document 6-28-06

    I-69 Final Eis Document 6-28-06

    FHWA-TN-EIS-04-01F INTERSTATE 69, SECTION OF INDEPENDENT UTILITY #9 From the Interstate 55/MS State Route 304 Interchange in Hernando, Mississippi to the Intersection of U.S. 51 and State Route 385 in Millington, Tennessee DeSoto and Marshall Counties, Mississippi Shelby and Fayette Counties, Tennessee Final Environmental Impact Statement Submitted Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 42 U.S.C. 4332(2) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, Tennessee Department of Transportation and Mississippi Department of Transportation Cooperating Agency Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service This document identifies and assesses the environmental impacts associated with the construction of an interstate facility from Hernando, Mississippi to Millington, Tennessee. The project is a segment of Corridor 18, a Congressionally-designated High Priority transportation Corridor that will be designated as Interstate 69. Segments of the roadway are proposed for new locations, while other segments will follow existing interstates and state highways built to interstate standards. The length of the proposed improvement is approximately 44 miles. __________________ ______________________________________________________________ Date of Approval For Federal Highway Administration __________________ ______________________________________________________________ Date of Approval For
  • 279300000 the ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Bofa Merrill Lynch Siebert Brandford Shank & Co

    279300000 the ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Bofa Merrill Lynch Siebert Brandford Shank & Co

    NEW ISSUE – BOOK-ENTRY ONLY RATINGS: See “RATINGS” herein. Subject to compliance by the Authority with certain covenants, in the opinion of Pugh, Jones, Johnson & Quandt, P.C., Chicago, Illinois, Bond Counsel, under present law interest on the 2010A Bonds will not be includible in the gross income of the owners thereof for Federal income tax purposes. Interest on the 2010A Bonds will not be treated as an item of tax preference in computing the alternative minimum tax for individuals and corporations. See the heading “TAX MATTERS” herein for a more detailed discussion of some of the federal tax consequences of owning the 2010A Bonds. The interest on the 2010A Bonds is not exempt from present Illinois income taxes. $279,300,000 THE ILLINOIS STATE TOLL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY Toll Highway Senior Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series A-1 Maturities, Principal Amounts, Interest Rates, Yields and CUSIP Numbers are shown on the Inside of the Front Cover This Official Statement contains information relating to The Illinois State Toll Highway Authority (the “Authority”) and the Authority’s Toll Highway Senior Refunding Revenue Bonds, 2010 Series A-1 (the “2010A Bonds”). The 2010A Bonds are being issued under a Trust Indenture dated as of December 1, 1985 (as amended, restated and supplemented, the “Indenture”) from the Authority to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor trustee (the “Trustee”). The 2010A Bonds will be issuable as fully registered bonds in the name of Cede & Co., as registered owner and nominee of The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”).
  • Tier 2 Biological Opinion Section 2

    Tier 2 Biological Opinion Section 2

    TIER 2 BIOLOGICAL OPINION for SECTION 2 of the PROPOSED INTERSTATE 69 (I-69) EXTENSION FROM EVANSVILLE TO INDIANAPOLIS for the FEDERALLY ENDANGERED INDIANA BAT traversing portions of GIBSON, PIKE, and DAVIESS COUNTIES, INDIANA Submitted to the Federal Highway Administration February 2010 Prepared by: Robin McWilliams Munson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Bloomington Field Office 620 S. Walker Street Bloomington, IN 47403 (812) 334-4261 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document contains a Tier 2 Biological Opinion for Section 2 of I-69 and tiers back to the Tier 1 Revised Programmatic Biological Opinion dated August 24, 2006 for the proposed extension of I-69 from Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana. The Federal Highway Administration reinitiated formal consultation on Tier 1 of the proposed I-69 extension on March 7, 2006 and submitted an addendum to the original Biological Assessment that detailed significant new information regarding potential impacts to the Federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) that were not known or available for analysis during the original formal consultation period in 2003. The effects associated with the proposed construction, operation, and maintenance of Section 2 of I-69 are within the scope of effects contemplated in the Tier 1 Revised Programmatic Biological Opinion. Upon evaluation of the proposed project, we believe incidental take of Indiana bats in the Section 2 Action Area is likely, but the impact of such taking is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Indiana bat and is not likely to adversely modify the bat’s designated Critical Habitat. A Tier 2 Incidental Take Statement for Section 2 has been included at the end of this Biological Opinion with its non-discretionary Reasonable and Prudent Measures and associated Terms and Conditions to further minimize the incidental take of Indiana bats in Section 2.
  • Drake Special Investment ADOPTED District JULY 2019

    Drake Special Investment ADOPTED District JULY 2019

    Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for the Drake Special Investment ADOPTED District JULY 2019 Prepared for the City of Des Moines by czbLLC Acknowledgements Des Moines Mayor and City Council Des Moines Plan and Zoning Commission Stakeholder Committee Members Ryan Arnold Lori Calhoun Seth Crouch Alec Davis Deric Gourd Seth Johnson Jennifer Sayers Jason Stuyvesant Adam White City Staff Chris Johansen, Community Development Director Kyle Larson, AICP, Senior City Planner Amber Lynch, AICP, Senior City Planner Laura Peters, ASLA, Assistant City Planner (Project Lead) Anuprit Minhas, AICP, Assistant City Planner Naomi Hamlett, Economic Development Coordinator With assistance from various City staff members across multiple City departments. Consultants: czbLLC with Fall Creek Consultants and MJB Consulting 2 Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for Drake Special Investment District | czbLLC July 2019 Table of 4 Introduction Contents 10 PART 1 Neighborhood Planning and Revitalization in Des Moines 18 PART 2 Assets, Trends, and Key Issues 26 PART 3 Vision, Priorities, and Outcomes 32 PART 4 Action Plan 50 Appendix Neighborhood Planning | czbLLC for City of Des Moines, IA, July 2019 3 Introduction Introduction In the quality and design of its built environment, the Drake neighborhood We are a conveys an aspiration to diverse neighborhood create something valuable with a strong and lasting—a place where neighborhood people for generations to association... come would feel elevated by their surroundings. The solid homes with artful details, the dimensions of Kingman Boulevard, the buildings and lawns of Drake University, the towering oaks at Drake Park, and many other traits speak to this intention. These qualities are a key part of Drake’s recent reemergence as a neighborhood of choice after periods of tumultuous change.
  • House Study Bill 235 - Introduced

    House Study Bill 235 - Introduced

    House Study Bill 235 - Introduced SENATE/HOUSE FILE _____ BY (PROPOSED COMMITTEE ON STATE GOVERNMENT BILL BY LEGISLATIVE SERVICES AGENCY) A BILL FOR 1 An Act providing for congressional and legislative districts 2 and providing an effective date. 3 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: TLSB 9022XD (38) 84 ec/gr S.F. _____ H.F. _____ 1 Section 1. Section 40.1, Code 2011, is amended by striking 2 the section and inserting in lieu thereof the following: 3 40.1 Congressional districts. 4 The state of Iowa is hereby organized and divided into four 5 congressional districts, which shall be composed, respectively, 6 of the following counties: 7 1. The first district shall consist of the counties of 8 Worth, Mitchell, Howard, Winneshiek, Allamakee, Bremer, 9 Fayette, Clayton, Black Hawk, Buchanan, Delaware, Dubuque, 10 Marshall, Tama, Benton, Linn, Jones, Jackson, Poweshiek, and 11 Iowa. 12 2. The second district shall consist of the counties of 13 Jasper, Johnson, Cedar, Clinton, Marion, Mahaska, Keokuk, 14 Washington, Louisa, Muscatine, Scott, Clarke, Lucas, Monroe, 15 Wapello, Jefferson, Henry, Des Moines, Decatur, Wayne, 16 Appanoose, Davis, Van Buren, and Lee. 17 3. The third district shall consist of the counties of 18 Guthrie, Dallas, Polk, Pottawattamie, Cass, Adair, Madison, 19 Warren, Mills, Montgomery, Adams, Union, Fremont, Page, Taylor, 20 and Ringgold. 21 4. The fourth district shall consist of the counties of 22 Lyon, Osceola, Dickinson, Emmet, Kossuth, Winnebago, Sioux, 23 O’Brien, Clay, Palo Alto, Hancock, Cerro Gordo, Floyd, 24 Chickasaw, Plymouth, Cherokee, Buena Vista, Pocahontas, 25 Humboldt, Wright, Franklin, Butler, Woodbury, Ida, Sac, 26 Calhoun, Webster, Hamilton, Hardin, Grundy, Monona, Crawford, 27 Carroll, Greene, Boone, Story, Harrison, Shelby, and Audubon.