DOCSLIB.ORG

D3.2B Digital Library Reference Model

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D3.2B Digital Library Reference Model DL.org: Coordination Action on Digital Library Interoperability, Best Practices and Modelling Foundations Funded under the Seventh Framework Programme, ICT Programme – “Cultural Heritage and Technology Enhanced Learning” Project Number: 231551 Deliverable Title: D3.2b The Digital Library Reference Model Submission Due Date: September 2010 Actual Submission Date: April 2011 Work Package: WP3 Responsible Partner: CNR Deliverable Status: Final DL.org www.dlorg.eu Document Information Project Project acronym: DL.org Project full title: Coordination Action on Digital Library Interoperability, Best Practices & Modelling Foundations Project start: 1 December 2008 Project duration: 24 months Call: ICT CALL 3, FP7-ICT-2007-3 Grant agreement no.: 231551 Document Deliverable number: D3.2b Deliverable title: The Digital Library Reference Model Editor(s): L. Candela, A. Nardi Author(s): L. Candela, G. Athanasopoulos, D. Castelli, K. El Raheb, P. Innocenti, Y. Ioannidis, A. Katifori, A. Nika, G. Vullo, S. Ross Reviewer(s): C. Thanos Contributor(s): (DELOS Reference Model Authors) L. Candela; D. Castelli; N. Ferro; Y. Ioannidis; G. Koutrika; C. Meghini; P. Pagano; S. Ross; D. Soergel; M. Agosti; M. Dobreva; V. Katifori; H. Schuldt Participant(s): CNR, NKUA, UG Work package no.: WP3 Work package title: Digital Library Models and Patterns Work package leader: CNR Work package participants: CNR, NKUA, UG Est. Person-months: 6 Distribution: Public Nature: Report Version/Revision: 1.0 Draft/Final Final Total number of pages: 273 (including cover) Keywords: Reference Model; Content Domain Model; User Domain Model; Functionality Domain Model; Policy Domain Model; Quality Domain Model; Architecture Domain Model; Conformance Criteria; Conformance Checklist; Page 2 of 273 D3.2b The Digital Library Reference Model DL.org – No. 231551 www.dlorg.eu DL.org Disclaimer This document contains information on the core activities, findings, and outcomes of the EC-funded project, DL.org, and in some instances, distinguished experts forming part of the project’s Liaison Group, six Thematic Working Groups and External Advisory Board. The document may contain references to content in the DELOS Digital Library Reference Model, which is under copyright. Any references to content herein should clearly indicate the authors, source, organisation and date of publication. This publication has been produced with the funding of the European Commission. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the DL.org consortium and cannot be considered to reflect the views of the European Commission. The European Union was established in accordance with the Treaty on European Union (Maastricht). There are currently 27 Member States of the Union. It is based on the European Communities and member states cooperation in the fields of Common Foreign and Security Policy and Justice and Home Affairs. The five main institutions of the European Union are the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers, the European Commission, the Court of Justice and the Court of Auditors. (http://europa.eu.int/) DL.org is funded by the European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme (FP7). DL.org – No. 231551 D3.2b The Digital Library Reference Model Page 3 of 273 DL.org www.dlorg.eu Table of Contents Summary ......................................................................................................................................................9 About this Document .................................................................................................................................10 PART I The Digital Library Manifesto .....................................................................................12 I.1 Introduction...........................................................................................................................................13 I.1.1 What is a Manifesto?......................................................................................................................13 I.1.2 Motivation ......................................................................................................................................14 I.2 The Digital Library Universe: A Three-tier Framework ..........................................................................17 I.3 The Digital Library Universe: Main Concepts.........................................................................................19 I.3.1 Organisation ...................................................................................................................................19 I.3.2 Content...........................................................................................................................................20 I.3.3 User ................................................................................................................................................20 I.3.4 Functionality...................................................................................................................................20 I.3.5 Policy ..............................................................................................................................................20 I.3.6 Quality ............................................................................................................................................21 I.3.7 Architecture....................................................................................................................................21 I.4 The Digital Library Universe: The Main Roles of Actors ........................................................................23 I.4.1 DL End-users...................................................................................................................................23 I.4.2 DL Managers...................................................................................................................................24 I.4.3 DL Software Developers .................................................................................................................24 I.5 Digital Library Development Framework...............................................................................................27 I.6 Digital Library Manifesto: Concluding Remarks.....................................................................................29 PART II The Digital Library Reference Model in a Nutshell .....................................................30 II.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................31 II.1.1 The Digital Library Manifesto in Brief............................................................................................31 II.1.2 Guide to Using the Reference Model ............................................................................................33 II.1.2.1 Concept Maps.........................................................................................................................34 II.1.2.2 Notational Conventions..........................................................................................................34 II.2 The Constituent Domains.....................................................................................................................36 II.2.1 DL Resource Domain .....................................................................................................................37 II.2.2 Content Domain ............................................................................................................................39 II.2.3 User Domain..................................................................................................................................42 II.2.4 Functionality Domain ....................................................................................................................43 II.2.5 Policy Domain................................................................................................................................48 II.2.6 Quality Domain..............................................................................................................................50 II.2.7 Architecture Domain .....................................................................................................................52 Page 4 of 273 D3.2b The Digital Library Reference Model DL.org – No. 231551 www.dlorg.eu DL.org II.3 Reference Model in Action...................................................................................................................55 II.3.1 Interoperability..............................................................................................................................55 II.3.2 The Preservation Issue ..................................................................................................................56 II.4 Related Work........................................................................................................................................59 II.4.1 The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model......................................................................................59 II.4.2 Stream, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios and Societies: The 5S Framework.....................................60 II.4.3 The DELOS Classification and Evaluation Scheme .........................................................................63 II.4.4 DOLCE-based Ontologies for Large Software Systems ..................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Creative Destruction and the Music Industry
    Creative Destruction and The Music Industry A Thorough approach on new technologies and their impact on the sustainability of the music market. FLAVIO SEFA SUPERVISOR Daniel Nordgård University of Agder, 2019-2020 Faculty of Fine Arts Department of Popular Music Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Research Question .................................................................................................................................... 4 Sub Research Question ............................................................................................................................. 4 Aim of Research ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Creative Destruction ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Creative Destruction and Disruptive innovation .................................................................................... 11 The Main Stages of The Music Industry .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Libraries and Reference Services: Present and Future Gobinda G
    Journal of Documentation Digital libraries and reference services: present and future Gobinda G. Chowdhury Article information: To cite this document: Gobinda G. Chowdhury, (2002),"Digital libraries and reference services: present and future", Journal of Documentation, Vol. 58 Iss 3 pp. 258 - 283 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410210425809 Downloaded on: 09 September 2015, At: 09:24 (PT) References: this document contains references to 70 other documents. To copy this document: [email protected] The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3867 times since 2006* Users who downloaded this article also downloaded: Caroline Henley, (2004),"Digital reference services for young library users: a comparison of four services", Library Review, Vol. 53 Iss 1 pp. 30-36 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530410514775 James A. Stemper, John T. Butler, (2001),"Developing a model to provide digital reference services", Reference Services Review, Vol. 29 Iss 3 pp. 172-189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320110398133 Gobinda Chowdhury, Simone Margariti, (2004),"Digital reference services: a snapshot of the current practices in Scottish libraries", Library Review, Vol. 53 Iss 1 pp. 50-60 http:// dx.doi.org/10.1108/00242530410514793 Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:550172 [] For Authors If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines Downloaded by Rutgers University At 09:24 09 September 2015 (PT) are available for all.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream-Ripping: Its Role in the UK Music Piracy Landscape Three Years On
    Stream-ripping: Its role in the UK music piracy landscape three years on September 2020 PRS for Music Foreword Stream-ripping: its role in the UK music piracy landscape three years on builds on research we published with the Intellectual Property Office three years ago. The initial research, Stream-ripping: How it works and its role in the UK music piracy landscape, came at a time when little work had been done to understand the size of problem posed by stream-ripping. The previous report allowed us to map the landscape of online music piracy and to gain insight into the functioning and the business model of stream-ripping services. We found evidence to support our assumption that stream-ripping was on course to become the dominant mode of online infringement. This second wave of research shows that our expectation is now the reality: stream-ripping services account for more than 80% of the top 50 music specific piracy sites. We can see that the services are becoming more sophisticated, offering better quality downloads, evolving their revenue streams, and becoming more adept at operating beneath the radar, with many using the popular content delivery network Cloudflare to obfuscate the location of their servers. But what we can also see is that concerted efforts by the industry do work: a reduction of more than 50% of BitTorrent sites can be attributed to increased geo-blocking and enforcement efforts over the past three years. Since this research was conducted, the world has changed beyond what anyone could have imagined. Amidst the massive societal changes, the almost global lockdown caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has also accelerated the acculturation of digital services.
    [Show full text]
  • Numer 2/2013
    Numer 2/15/2013 ISSN 2299-5536 l UMOWA UP RP – SIPO CHRL – WAŻNA DLA PRZEDSIĘBIORCÓW I WYNALAZCÓW l PRAWO W INTERNECIE – JAK KORZYSTAĆ LEGALNIE Z ZASOBÓW SIECI l EDUKACJA = INNOWACYJNA GOSPODARKA l ROK PROF. J. CZOCHRALSKIEGO l CZY MOŻNA WIEDZIEĆ „PRZEDTEM”, CO BĘDZIE „POTEM” – PROF. E. MĄCZYŃSKA, PREZES PTE l ORZECZNICTWO TRYBUNAŁU atentowego RP SPRAWIEDLIWOŚCI UE O ZNAKACH rzędu P TOWAROWYCH l REFORMA PCT U l TROLLE PATENTOWE l PRAWO DO GENÓW l DRZWI OTWARTE UP RP WSPIERAMY MŁODYCH WYNALAZCÓW KONFERENCJE I INNE PRZEDSIęWZIęCIA UP RP W III KWARTALE 2013 r. 5-6 września w Krakowie Międzynarodowe seminarium z cyklu: WŁASNOŚĆ PRZEMYSŁOWA W INNOWACYJNEJ GOSPODARCE „WDRAżANIE INNOWACJI: PRZEKSZTAłCANIE WIEDZY W ZYSK” 16-20 września w Cedzynie XXXII SYMPOZJUM RZECZNIKÓW PATENTOWYCH SZKÓł WYżSZYCH 23 września w siedzibie Urzędu spotkanie z młodymi naukowcami i konstruktorami „NAukA JEST SUPER” Zajęcia poprowadzą dorośli specjaliści razem z dziećmi, które zaprezentują swoje pasje, konstrukcje, hodowle. l Dlaczego warto grać na komputerze? l Proste programowanie komputerów. l Bezzałogowe łodzie podwodne. l Bajeczne eksperymenty chemiczne. To główne tematy tego fascynującego spotkania. 26-27 września FESTIWAL NAukI W URZęDZIE PATENTOWYM l 26 września wykład i panel dyskusyjny „O przeszłości i przyszłości wynalazków”, w którym wezmą udział: dr Sławomir Łotysz – Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, prof. Bolesław Orłowski – Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Pamięci Narodowej, Michał Szota – Prezes, Stowarzyszenie Polskich Wynalazców i Racjonalizatorów, Zbysław Szwaj, konstruktor – Leopard Automobile-Mielec l 27 września wykład i panel dyskusyjny „Jak czerpać korzyści materialne z patentów i innych praw niematerialnych?”, w którym udział wezmą: Karol Król – Prezes, Beesfund, Piotr Tomaszewski – Prezes Zarządu, Patentbroker, Dr inż. Wojciech Nawrot – Autorski Park Technologiczny oraz przedstawiciele UP RP SPIS TREŚCI Szanowni Państwo, O wartościach europejskich .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chat Reference: Training and Competencies for Librarians
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln May 2009 Chat Reference: Training and Competencies for Librarians Atefeh Noorizadeh Ghasri Azad University, Tehran Shomal Branch, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Library and Information Science Commons, and the Other Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Ghasri, Atefeh Noorizadeh, "Chat Reference: Training and Competencies for Librarians" (2009). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 256. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/256 Library Philosophy and Practice 2009 ISSN 1522-0222 Chat Reference: Training and Competencies for Librarians Atefeh Noorizadeh Ghasri Mozhdeh Dehghani M.A. Students in Library and Information Science Azad University, Tehran Shomal Branch Tehran, Iran Introduction Technology has changed library services. In particular, the use of the Internet has made a significant difference in the way that traditional services are provided. Reference service is a critical service that has been changed by technology. Digital or virtual reference has developed as a way of helping patrons “not only on the desk, but in cyberspace” (Zanin-Yost, 2004). This article deals with the introduction of chat reference as a new concept that is not extensively used in Iranian libraries and also with competencies needed to implement it. The principles of reference service are discussed in
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Music Business Models
    School of Journalism and Mass Communications Faculty of Economic and Political Sciences Digital Music Business Models BY Esra Poryalı A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF DIGITAL MEDIA, COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM Specialization: Digital Media, Communication, Culture Supervisor: Prof. George Tsourvakas Prof. George Kalliris Prof. Andreas Veglis May 2019 Abstract The Internet and modern-day technologies have changed the way people connect with the world around them. The music industry is one of the areas that is undoubtedly affected by the Internet. Music technologies have faced a drastic reorganization process due to the digital revolution that changed the way people consume, source, listen, purchase, discover, experience, produce, read and learn music. These technological advancements have induced great changes for artists, listeners, and producers. This study will attempt to investigate the business models of digital music that can be profitable in the future. As previous studies suggest (Arditi, 2017), with the introduction of the technological revolution the whole revenue mechanism has shifted. This study attempts to give insight into the changing revenue mechanism of how musicians, record labels, make money from digital music by analyzing the digital music business models from the perspective of the consumer, the record labels and the artists. The fundamental questions this study attempts to address are a) how technology has changed by presenting an overview of the music industry, b) what kind of digital music business models exist by analyzing their effects from the perspective of the listeners, artists and record labels, and c) what happens if the business model does not meet the demand of the users by explaining the ‘piracy’ phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Librarians' Perceptions of Quality Digital Reference Services
    LIBRARIANS' PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY DIGITAL REFERENCE SERVICES BY MEANS OF CRITICAL INCIDENTS by Eylem Ozkaramanl³Ä B.A., Hacettepe University, 1998 M.A., Hacettepe University, 2000 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Department of Library and Information Science School of Information Sciences in partial ful¯llment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh February, 2005 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE SCHOOL OF INFORMATION SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Eylem Ozkaramanl³Ä It was defended on February 25, 2005 and approved by Edie M. Rasmussen, Ph.D., Advisor Jose-Marie Gri±ths, Ph.D. David Robins, Ph.D. Gloriana St. Clair, Ph.D. Dissertation Director: Edie M. Rasmussen, Ph.D., Advisor ii Copyright °c by Eylem Ozkaramanl³Ä February, 2005 iii LIBRARIANS' PERCEPTIONS OF QUALITY DIGITAL REFERENCE SERVICES BY MEANS OF CRITICAL INCIDENTS Eylem Ozkaramanl³,Ä Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh, February, 2005 This research is an e®ort to understand chat reference services through librarians' perceptions of successful and less successful chat reference service. Ten Academic libraries in Ohio and Pennsylvania which o®ered chat reference services were identi¯ed and 40 librarians were interviewed in order to address the research questions of this study. The main methodology used was the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) that is based on collecting and analyzing the most memorable experiences of human behavior in order to evaluate and identify ways to increase e®ectiveness of service. On-site, personal interviews were conducted with librarians who provide chat reference services. The subjects were initially asked to de¯ne chat reference service and compare it with traditional reference services.
    [Show full text]
  • GOOD MONEY GONE BAD Digital Thieves and the Hijacking of the Online Ad Business a Report on the Profitability of Ad-Supported Content Theft
    GOOD MONEY GONE BAD Digital Thieves and the Hijacking of the Online Ad Business A Report on the Profitability of Ad-Supported Content Theft February 2014 www.digitalcitizensalliance.org/followtheprofit CONTENTS Contents .............................................................................................................................................................i Table of References .....................................................................................................................................ii Figures .........................................................................................................................................................................................ii Tables ...........................................................................................................................................................................................ii About this Report ..........................................................................................................................................1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 3 Three Key Relevant Growth Trends .................................................................................................... 4 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Sites Studied ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Virtual Reference Service in Academic Libraries
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by E-LIS repository Virtual Reference Service in Academic Libraries: A Case Study of the Libraries of IIMs and IITs in India Bulu Maharana1 K. C. Panda2 Abstract: The paper introduces the concept of Virtual Reference Service (VRS) in academic libraries. The survey investigates into the state of VRS in the libraries of premier educational institutions, the IIMs and IITs in India. The study reveals that although a remarkable advancement in the automation and electronic access to information has been achieved in these libraries, there is a long way ahead to march towards the establishment of standard VRS at par with similar institutions in developed countries. Keywords: Virtual Reference Service, Digital Reference Service, Live Reference service 1. INTRODUCTION Technology is developing at a very fast rate and what looks a myth a few years back is becoming a reality now. The largest single factor which caused the significant changes in library operations and services in this century is undoubtedly the evolution of information technology. Technology has changed the way the libraries serve their users and this change will continue in future also. While continuing to provide many traditional information services, libraries are developing new skills and taking new roles that are necessary to support technology based services. In the libraries and information centers “Reference Service” is an important personalised service. Traditionally, it is a one-to-one service with user and reference librarian. The user is helped by the variety of sources available to meet the information needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Best of a Decade on Opensource.Com 2010–2019
    Best of a decade on Opensource.com 2010–2019 In celebration of our 10-year anniversary Opensource.com/yearbook FROM THE EDITOR ............................. FROM THE EDITOR ............................. Dear reader, As we celebrate 10 years of publishing, our focus is on the people from all over the globe, in various roles, from diverse backgrounds, who have helped us explore the multitude of ways in which open source can improve our lives—from technology and programming to farming and design, and so much more. We are celebrating you because we’ve learned that growing this unique storytelling site demands that we do one thing better than all the rest: listen to and talk with our readers and writers. Over the years, we’ve gotten better at it. We regularly hold meetings where we review how articles performed with readers from the week before and discuss why we think that’s so. We brainstorm and pitch new and exciting article ideas to our writer community on a weekly basis. And we build and nurture close relationships with many writers who publish articles for us every month. As an editor, I never would have imagined my biggest responsibility would be community management and relationship building over copy editing and calendar planning. I’m so grateful for this because it’s made being a part of Opensource.com a deeply rewarding experience. In December, we closed out a decade of publishing by reaching a new, all-time record of over 2 million reads and over 1 million readers. For us, this validates and affirms the value we’ve learned to place on relationships with people in a world swirling with metrics and trends.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Midwest Archives Conference Volume 34, Number 1
    Archival Issues Journal of the Midwest Archives Conference Volume 34, Number 1, 2012 CONTENTS “Digital Representation of Disability History: Developing a Virtual Exhibition” Arjun Sabharwal “Analog, the Sequel: An Analysis of Current Film Archiving Practice and Hesitance to Embrace Digital Preservation” Suzanna Conrad “History Education Outreach Programs for Adults: A Missed Opportunity for Archivists?” Jessica Miller PUBLICATION REVIEWS ISSN 10674993 Archival Issues Journal of the Midwest Archives Conference Volume 34, Number 1, 2012 CONTENTS “Digital Representation of Disability History: Developing a Virtual Exhibition” Arjun Sabharwal .............................................................................................. 7 “Analog, the Sequel: An Analysis of Current Film Archiving Practice and Hesitance to Embrace Digital Preservation” Suzanna Conrad ............................................................................................. 27 “History Education Outreach Programs for Adults: A Missed Opportunity for Archivists?” Jessica Miller ................................................................................................. 45 2 ARCHIVAL ISSUES Vol. 34, No. 1, 2012 PUBLICATION REVIEWS Better Off Forgetting? Essays on Archives, Public Policy, and Collective Memory reviewed by Jean Dryden ................................................................................55 Organizational Culture for Information Managers reviewed by Bradford Lee Eden ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Patent-Based Open Science
    Maine Law Review Volume 59 Number 2 Symposium: Closing in on Open Science: Article 6 Trends in Intellectual Property & Scientific Research June 2007 Road Map to Revolution? Patent-Based Open Science Lee Petherbridge Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Lee Petherbridge, Road Map to Revolution? Patent-Based Open Science, 59 Me. L. Rev. 339 (2007). Available at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/mlr/vol59/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Maine Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROAD MAP TO REVOLUTION? PATENT-BASED OPEN SCIENCE Lee Petherbridge, Ph.D I. INTRODUCTION II. A TOPOGRAPHY OF INNOVATION AND LAW IN THE LIFE SCIENCES A. The Industrial Infrastructure: Integrating Public and Private Science B. The Legal Infrastructure: A Proprietary Approach I. The Innovation Suppressive Cost of Monopoly 2. Additional Innovation Suppressive Costs III. A THEORY OF OPEN LIFE SCIENCE A. Open Science B. To Open Science from Open Source I. Addressing Fixed Costs 2. Peer Worker Potential 3. Issues of Modularity and Granularity 4. Subsequent (Mis)appropriation IV. TOWARD A PATENT-BASED OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK A. Establishing a Patent Servitude B. Patent Servitudes in Operation C. Additional Considerations V. CONCLUDING REMARKS HeinOnline -- 59 Me. L. Rev. 339 2007 340 MAINE LAW REVIEW [Vol.
    [Show full text]