DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf WATER BEETLES IN RELATION TO PONDFISH CULTURE, WITH LIFE HISTORIES OF THOSE FOUND. IN FISHPONDS AT FAIRPORT, IOWA. By CHARLES BRANCH WILSON, Ph. D. State Normal School, Department ofScience, WesVield, Mass. Contribution from the U. S. Fisheries Biological Station, Fairport, Iowa• .:I­ CONTENTS. Page. Page. Introduction . 232 Enemies of adults . 247 Importance of water beetles . 232 Turtles . 247 Ignorance of Americanspecies . 232 Birds '" .......•. 247 Lakes versus fishponds...........•.... 233 Toads and frogs ". 248 Methods..•.......................... 233 Electric lights . 248 Ecology .. 235 Beetlesas fish eaters . 249 Modifications of structure and vestiture. 235 Fish as beetle eaters .. 252 Locomotion .. 235 Evidence from fish bait.......•....... 252 Migration from one pond to another . 237 Evidence from fish stomachs•.......... 253 Distribution according to size . 238 General summary and suggestions . 260 . Structural adaptations :. 238 Beetledistributionin Fairportfishponds . 263 For locomotion . 238 Source of material.. 264 Forrespiration . 239 Influence of environment . 264 For flotation . 241 Restriction ofBpecies . 266 For sex functions '" ." . 242 Relative importance of species . 267 For sight . 242 Systematicdescription of Fairportspecies . 267 Enemies of larvse " . 242 Key for identification of larvre . 268 The larva . 242 Key foridentification of pupse . 269 Time of pupation . 243 Peltodytes __ . 271 Dragonfly nymphs . 243 P. edentulus . 271 Mites . 244 Haliplus . 273 Hydra . 244 H. ruficollis . 274 Ants . 244 Coptotomus . 275 Turtles . 244 C. interrogatus . 275 Frogs . 244 Cybister . 277 Snails . 245 C. fimbriolatus. : , 277 Parasites . 245 Dytiscus '" . 282 Enemies of pupre . 245 D. verticalis ; . 282 Water . 245 Hydroporus ,. 285 Imperfect pupation . 246 H. niger ,. 285 Parasites . 246 Laccophilus . 286 The black horsefly . 246 L. maculosus .. 286 Ants . 247 L. proximus.........•............ 290 231 232 BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF FISHERIES. Systematic description of Fairport species­ Systematic description of Fairport species­ Continued. Page. Continued. Page. Thermonectes . 291 Laccobius . 315 T. basilaris ~ . 291 L. agilis . 315 T. ornaticollis . 296 Enochrus . 316 Acilius . 299 E. nebulosus '" . 318 A. semisulcatus . 299 E. diffusis : . 320 Dineutes . 302 E. perplexus . 321 D. americanus . 302 Tropisternus . 321 Gyrinus . 308 T. lateralis __ . 321 G. ventralis . 308 T. glaber . 326 G. limbatus . 308 T. mixtus - . 329 Berosus . 309 Hydrous . 332 B. striatus _._ . 309 H. triangularis . 332 B. pantherinus , 311 ,Donacia . 332 B. peregrinus . 312 D. requalis ,. 332 Hydrophilus . 314 Cap attachment on egg case . 332 H. obtusatus . 314 Bibliography . 334 INTRODUCTION. IMPORTANCE OF WATER BEETLES. The beetles are far more numerous than any other order of insects and are very cosmopolitan in their distribution. Every natural pond, river, and stream is peopled with them, and if one constructs an artificial fishpond in all probability beetles will constitute its first and most permanent insect inhabitants. Pondfish culture, therefore, in order to prove successful, demands sufficient acquaintance with the water beetles to yield a workable knowledge of their economic relations to the fish. The following paper is a beginning toward such an acquaintance and endeavors to suggest lines of research that may prove both interesting and profit­ able to the fish-culturist. IGNORANCE OF AMERICAN SPECIES. Unfortunately, while our American water beetles are fairly well known to the systematist, so that they appear in museum collections and lists of species, very little is known about their life histories, their habits, and their economic impor­ tance. According to Comstock (1912), at least 300 species of carnivorous diving beetles (Dytiscidee) occur in this country, 40 species of whirligig beetles (Gyrinidss), and 150 species of water scavenger beetles (Hydrophilidee). Moreover, there are 25 species of herbivorous water beetles (Haliplidse), a family only briefly mentioned by Comstock. Out of this total of more than 500 species, which is probably far below the actual number, the habits and complete life histories of only about 20 are known. The partial development of 15 other species has been recorded, chiefly the egg cases and newly hatched larvee of hydrophilids by Richmond (1920). This excellent paper-also gave valuable keys for the identification of the egg cases, larvai, and pupee of the Hydrophilidse, but nothing of the sort has been published for the other families. Abstracts of one or two of these published life histories, which are important' from the standpoint of fish culture, are included in the present paper, and in addi­ tion those of 20 other common species are presented, together with the economic relations of the entire group. WATER BEETLES IN RELATION TO PONDFISH CULTURE. 233 With our present meager knowledge outside of the Hydrophilidee it is not safe to name the larvee and pupre of any species, even tentatively, by basing our judg­ ment on the known fauna of the pond from which the specimens were taken, on their size, or on any likeness they may show to European forms. All but one of the species here presented has been reared from the larva to the imago, thus making its identity certain. LAKES VERSUS FISHPONDS. Attention should be called to one very pronounced difference between the fauna of a lake and that of an ordinary fishpond. In the former water beetles are almost entirely lacking; in the latter they are one of the most abundant groups present. Muttkowski (1918, pp. 413, 414), in discussing the fauna of Lake Mendota, said: With all their manifold adaptations to an aquatic life, aquatic beetles, except for a few species, are scarce in thelake complex * * *. The Hydrobiidre, Dytiscidre, Hydrophilidre (except Berosus), Donaciinse, and Gyrinidre, the latter despite the water-breathing Iarvte, are practically absent from the lake community. The typical lake Coleoptora are the Haliplidm in the vegetation zone and the Dry­ opidse in the rocky and graeelly areas, while several species of adult Dytiscidre are locally abundant ** *. The difference between the lake and other aquatic communities is very marked in late sum­ mer, when sheltered water, such as the lagoons in the parks and the several ponds and creeks about the lake, teem with young dytiscid larvee of several species, while such Iarvre are conspicuously absent from the lake. Baker (1916, p. 308), in his discussion of the relations of mollusks to fish in Oneida Lake, N. Y., gave a list of the plants and animals found associated with the mollusks. There were included only two species of dytiscids, one haliplid, three gyrinids, and two hydrophilids. Of these, two species were found only in the stomach of the painted terrapin, leaving six species for the fauna of a lake 21 miles long and 5.50 miles wide. Sherman (1913, p. 44), in summing up the habits of the Dytiscidre, said: In the larger bodies of water it is very difficult to locate any beetles, and in them, whether swamps, ponds, or rivers, the beetles seem to occur only in very limited spots, which are usually separated from the main sheet of water, such as the eddies or small pools along the shore. In fact, the small water bodies are always best, and the time most favorable for collecting is when the water is low or almost dried up. In marked contrast to this scarcity in large bodies of water is the abundance of beetles in the smaller ponds. The largest of the Fairport ponds is but a trifle more than an acre in area, and yet in the fauna of them all beetles are among the most numerous insects both in number of species and in individuals. Pond 5D, just an acre in area, yielded 39 species, while 2E, only 0.13 of an acre, contained 31 species, and 12B, less than 0.02 of an acre, contained 17 species. METHODS. All the different beetle Iarvee that could be obtained were first studied in detail until they could be easily recognized. When the larva leaves the water in order to pupate, it either buries itself in the mud or constructs a pupal chamber, and on transforming throws off the old larval skin. As a part of this skin the chitinous covering of the head remains entire, with the antennes and mouth parts still 234 BULLETIN OF THE BUREAU OF FISHERIES. attached, and the species can be recognized as easily from these discarded skins as from the living larves. Then a search for as many pupre as could be found was made along the shores of the ponds, and in every instance care was taken to secure the old larval skin from the inside of the pupal chamber. In this way the larvse and pupre were defi­ nitely related, one to the other, and the pupre were then kept in suitable terraria until the adult beetle emerged. On transforming from the pupa to the adult the old pupa skin is thrown off and may be obtained from the pupal chamber and used to identify the species. One of the best methods with the larger species, when a pupal chamber is found on a pond shore, is to leave it as nearly intact as possible. By cutting around it with a knife blade a small cube of earth containing the chamber may be removed. This cube can then be kept in a terrarium until the adult beetle emerges, and the chamber will contain both the larval and pupal skins. If the chamber has been opened during the removal, it should be covered again with a pellet of mud before being placed in the terrarium. Darkness is necessary for the best success in rearing the specimens. In the case of the smaller species, and often with the larger ones, the natural pupal chamber is destroyed when the pupa is found. In such cases they will thrive equally well in an artificial chamber, made as nearly the size and shape of the original as possible, and with a removable cover, so that the development of the pupa may be watched from day to day.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen
    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/32097 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2019-01-28 and may be subject to change. Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- ISBN: 978-90-9022753-5 Layout: A.M. Antheunisse Printed by: Gildeprint Drukkerijen B.V. © 2008 W.C.E.P. Verberk; all rights reserved. Verberk W.C.E.P. (2008) Matching species to a changing landscape - Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape. PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen. This research project was financed by the program Development and Management of Nature Quality (O+BN) of the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (project number 3911773). Matching species to a changing landscape -Aquatic macroinvertebrates in a heterogeneous landscape- Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Natuurwetenschappen, Wiskunde en Informatica PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 7 maart 2008 om 10:30 uur precies door Wilhelmus Cornelis Egbertus Petrus Verberk geboren op 30 juni 1976 te Oploo, Nederland Promotores: Prof. dr. H. Siepel Prof. dr. G. van der Velde (Vrije Universiteit, Brussel) Copromotores: Dr. R.S.E.W. Leuven Dr. P.F.M. Verdonschot (Alterra, Wageningen UR) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Calcium Chloride CAS N°:10043-52-4
    OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE FOREWORD INTRODUCTION Calcium chloride CAS N°:10043-52-4 UNEP PUBLICATIONS 1 OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE SIDS Initial Assessment Report For SIAM 15 Boston, USA 22-25th October 2002 1. Chemical Name: Calcium chloride 2. CAS Number: 10043-52-4 3. Sponsor Country: Japan National SIDS Contact Point in Sponsor Country: Mr. Yasuhisa Kawamura Director Second Organization Div. Ministry of Foreign Affairs 2-2-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100 4. Shared Partnership with: 5. Roles/Responsibilities of the Partners: • Name of industry sponsor Tokuyama Corporation /consortium Mr. Shigeru Moriyama, E-mail: [email protected] Mr. Norikazu Hattori, E-mail: [email protected] • Process used 6. Sponsorship History • How was the chemical or This substance is sponsored by Japan under ICCA Initiative and category brought into the is submitted for first discussion at SIAM 15. OECD HPV Chemicals Programme ? 7. Review Process Prior to The industry consortium collected new data and prepared the the SIAM: updated IUCLID, and draft versions of the SIAR and SIAP. Japanese government peer-reviewed the documents, audited selected studies. 8. Quality check process: 9. Date of Submission: 10. Date of last Update: 2 UNEP PUBLICATIONS OECD SIDS CALCIUM CHLORIDE 11. Comments: No testing (X) Testing ( ) The CaCl2-HPV Consortium members: (Japan) Asahi Glass Co., Ltd. Central Glass Co., Ltd. Sanuki Kasei Co., Ltd. Tokuyama Corporation [a global leader of the CaCl2-HPV Consortium] Tosoh Corporation (Europe) Brunner Mond (UK) Ltd. Solvay S.A. (North America) The Dow Chemical Company General Chemical Industrial Products Inc. Tetra Technologies, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 46 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 Numbers Article 7 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2013 April 2013 Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota David B. MacLean Youngstown State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation MacLean, David B. 2013. "Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 46 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol46/iss1/7 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. MacLean: Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Po 104 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 46, Nos. 1 - 2 Inventory of Aquatic and Semiaquatic Coleoptera from the Grand Portage Indian Reservation, Cook County, Minnesota David B. MacLean1 Abstract Collections of aquatic invertebrates from the Grand Portage Indian Res- ervation (Cook County, Minnesota) during 2001 – 2012 resulted in 9 families, 43 genera and 112 species of aquatic and semiaquatic Coleoptera. The Dytisci- dae had the most species (53), followed by Hydrophilidae (20), Gyrinidae (14), Haliplidae (8), Chrysomelidae (7), Elmidae (3) and Curculionidae (5). The families Helodidae and Heteroceridae were each represented by a single spe- cies. Seventy seven percent of species were considered rare or uncommon (1 - 10 records), twenty percent common (11 - 100 records) and only three percent abundant (more than 100 records).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • COLEOPTERA COCCINELLIDAE) INTRODUCTIONS and ESTABLISHMENTS in HAWAII: 1885 to 2015
    AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE COCCINELLID (COLEOPTERA COCCINELLIDAE) INTRODUCTIONS AND ESTABLISHMENTS IN HAWAII: 1885 to 2015 JOHN R. LEEPER PO Box 13086 Las Cruces, NM USA, 88013 [email protected] [1] Abstract. Blackburn & Sharp (1885: 146 & 147) described the first coccinellids found in Hawaii. The first documented introduction and successful establishment was of Rodolia cardinalis from Australia in 1890 (Swezey, 1923b: 300). This paper documents 167 coccinellid species as having been introduced to the Hawaiian Islands with forty-six (46) species considered established based on unpublished Hawaii State Department of Agriculture records and literature published in Hawaii. The paper also provides nomenclatural and taxonomic changes that have occurred in the Hawaiian records through time. INTRODUCTION The Coccinellidae comprise a large family in the Coleoptera with about 490 genera and 4200 species (Sasaji, 1971). The majority of coccinellid species introduced into Hawaii are predacious on insects and/or mites. Exceptions to this are two mycophagous coccinellids, Calvia decimguttata (Linnaeus) and Psyllobora vigintimaculata (Say). Of these, only P. vigintimaculata (Say) appears to be established, see discussion associated with that species’ listing. The members of the phytophagous subfamily Epilachninae are pests themselves and, to date, are not known to be established in Hawaii. None of the Coccinellidae in Hawaii are thought to be either endemic or indigenous. All have been either accidentally or purposely introduced. Three species, Scymnus discendens (= Diomus debilis LeConte), Scymnus ocellatus (=Scymnobius galapagoensis (Waterhouse)) and Scymnus vividus (= Scymnus (Pullus) loewii Mulsant) were described by Sharp (Blackburn & Sharp, 1885: 146 & 147) from specimens collected in the islands. There are, however, no records of introduction for these species prior to Sharp’s descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon
    Dytiscid water beetles of the Yukon FRONTISPIECE. Neoscutopterus horni (Crotch), a large, black species of dytiscid beetle that is common in sphagnum bog pools throughout the Yukon Territory. 491 Dytiscid Water Beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) of the Yukon DAVID J. LARSON Department of Biology, Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada A1B 3X9 Abstract. One hundred and thirteen species of Dytiscidae (Coleoptera) are recorded from the Yukon Territory. The Yukon distribution, total geographical range and habitat of each of these species is described and multi-species patterns are summarized in tabular form. Several different range patterns are recognized with most species being Holarctic or transcontinental Nearctic boreal (73%) in lentic habitats. Other major range patterns are Arctic (20 species) and Cordilleran (12 species), while a few species are considered to have Grassland (7), Deciduous forest (2) or Southern (5) distributions. Sixteen species have a Beringian and glaciated western Nearctic distribution, i.e. the only Nearctic Wisconsinan refugial area encompassed by their present range is the Alaskan/Central Yukon refugium; 5 of these species are closely confined to this area while 11 have wide ranges that extend in the arctic and/or boreal zones east to Hudson Bay. Résumé. Les dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) du Yukon. Cent treize espèces de dytiques (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) sont connues au Yukon. Leur répartition au Yukon, leur répartition globale et leur habitat sont décrits et un tableau résume les regroupements d’espèces. La répartition permet de reconnaître plusieurs éléments: la majorité des espèces sont holarctiques ou transcontinentales-néarctiques-boréales (73%) dans des habitats lénitiques. Vingt espèces sont arctiques, 12 sont cordillériennes, alors qu’un petit nombre sont de la prairie herbeuse (7), ou de la forêt décidue (2), ou sont australes (5).
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites
    Bedfordshire and Luton County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 14 December 2020 BEDFORDSHIRE AND LUTON LOCAL SITES PARTNERSHIP 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2. HISTORY OF THE CWS SYSTEM ......................................................................................................................... 7 3. CURRENT CWS SELECTION PROCESS ................................................................................................................ 8 4. Nature Conservation Review CRITERIA (modified version) ............................................................................. 10 5. GENERAL SUPPLEMENTARY FACTORS ......................................................................................................... 14 6 SITE SELECTION THRESHOLDS........................................................................................................................ 15 BOUNDARIES (all CWS) ............................................................................................................................................ 15 WOODLAND, TREES and HEDGES ........................................................................................................................ 15 TRADITIONAL ORCHARDS AND FRUIT TREES ................................................................................................. 19 ARABLE FIELD MARGINS........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trichurispora Wellgundis Ng, N
    Comp. Parasitol. 75(1), 2008, pp. 82–91 Trichurispora wellgundis n. g., n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eugregarinida: Hirmocystidae) Parasitizing Adult Water Scavenger Beetles, Tropisternus collaris (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) in the Texas Big Thicket 1,3 2 2 R. E. CLOPTON, T. J. COOK, AND J. L. COOK 1 Department of Natural Science, Peru State College, Peru, Nebraska, U.S.A. and 2 Department of Biological Sciences, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77341-2166, U.S.A. ABSTRACT: Trichurispora wellgundis n. g., n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Eugregarinida: Hirmocystidae) is described from the adults of the water scavenger beetle Tropisternus collaris (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) collected from B A Steinhagen Lake in the Cherokee Unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve, Tyler County, Texas, U.S.A. Trichurispora is distinguished from known genera of Hirmocystidae by a distinct ‘‘trichurisiform’’ oocyst that is hesperidiform in outline, comprising a fusiform oocyst with shallowly ovoid terminal knobs or caps. Oocyst residua are present but confined to a central fusiform residuum vacuole. Adult and larval hydrophilid beetles represent distinctly different opportunities for parasite colonization and diversification. Gregarines have been reported from both adult and larval hydrophilid beetles, but no species and no genus is reported from both adult and larval hosts. In fact, gregarine taxic richness is often more disparate between adult and larval beetles of the same species than between host beetle species. This is the first report of a septate gregarine from an adult hydrophilid beetle in the Nearctic. KEY WORDS: Apicomplexa, Eugregarinida, Hirmocystidae, Gregarine, Trichurispora wellgundis n. g., n. sp., Didymophyes, Enterocystis hydrophili incertae sedis, Stylocephalus brevirostris incertae sedis, Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Tropisternus collaris, Texas, Big Thicket, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Introduction and Key to Families
    Royal Entomological Society HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS To purchase current handbooks and to download out-of-print parts visit: http://www.royensoc.co.uk/publications/index.htm This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. Copyright © Royal Entomological Society 2012 ROYAL ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON Vol. IV. Part 1. HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS COLEOPTERA INTRODUCTION AND KEYS TO FAMILIES By R. A. CROWSON LONDON Published by the Society and Sold at its Rooms 41, Queen's Gate, S.W. 7 31st December, 1956 Price-res. c~ . HANDBOOKS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BRITISH INSECTS The aim of this series of publications is to provide illustrated keys to the whole of the British Insects (in so far as this is possible), in ten volumes, as follows : I. Part 1. General Introduction. Part 9. Ephemeroptera. , 2. Thysanura. 10. Odonata. , 3. Protura. , 11. Thysanoptera. 4. Collembola. , 12. Neuroptera. , 5. Dermaptera and , 13. Mecoptera. Orthoptera. , 14. Trichoptera. , 6. Plecoptera. , 15. Strepsiptera. , 7. Psocoptera. , 16. Siphonaptera. , 8. Anoplura. 11. Hemiptera. Ill. Lepidoptera. IV. and V. Coleoptera. VI. Hymenoptera : Symphyta and Aculeata. VII. Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea. VIII. Hymenoptera : Cynipoidea, Chalcidoidea, and Serphoidea. IX. Diptera: Nematocera and Brachycera. X. Diptera: Cyclorrhapha. Volumes 11 to X will be divided into parts of convenient size, but it is not possible to specify in advance the taxonomic content of each part. Conciseness and cheapness are main objectives in this new series, and each part will be the work of a specialist, or of a group of specialists.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Sand Hills Ecological Landscape
    Chapter 9 Central Sand Hills Ecological Landscape Where to Find the Publication The Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin publication is available online, in CD format, and in limited quantities as a hard copy. Individual chapters are available for download in PDF format through the Wisconsin DNR website (http://dnr.wi.gov/, keyword “landscapes”). The introductory chapters (Part 1) and supporting materials (Part 3) should be downloaded along with individual ecological landscape chapters in Part 2 to aid in understanding and using the ecological landscape chapters. In addition to containing the full chapter of each ecological landscape, the website highlights key information such as the ecological landscape at a glance, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, natural community management opportunities, general management opportunities, and ecological landscape and Landtype Association maps (Appendix K of each ecological landscape chapter). These web pages are meant to be dynamic and were designed to work in close association with materials from the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan as well as with information on Wisconsin’s natural communities from the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory Program. If you have a need for a CD or paper copy of this book, you may request one from Dreux Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Photos (L to R): Karner blue butterfly, photo by Gregor Schuurman, Wisconsin DNR; small white lady’s-slipper, photo by Drew Feldkirchner, Wisconsin DNR; ornate box turtle, photo by Rori Paloski, Wisconsin DNR; Fassett’s locoweed, photo by Thomas Meyer, Wisconsin DNR; spatterdock darner, photo by David Marvin. Suggested Citation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Taxonomic Paper Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA Thomas P. Simon†, Charles C. Morris‡, Joseph R. Robb§, William McCoy | † Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 46403, United States of America ‡ US National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Porter, IN 47468, United States of America § US Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, Madison, IN 47250, United States of America | US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge, Oakland City, IN 47660, United States of America Corresponding author: Thomas P. Simon ([email protected]) Academic editor: Benjamin Price Received: 08 Dec 2014 | Accepted: 09 Jan 2015 | Published: 12 Jan 2015 Citation: Simon T, Morris C, Robb J, McCoy W (2015) Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Abstract The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species.
    [Show full text]