DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.1 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities A104444-7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.1 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities A104444-7 June 2021 Prepared by WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited On behalf of Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Quay West at MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1HH Tel: +44 (0)161 872 3223 Fax: +44 (0)161 872 3193 Email: Website: www.wyg.com WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England & Wales Number: 03050297 Registered Office: 3 Sovereign Square, Sovereign Street, Leeds, LS1 4ER Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Document control A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 2 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Document: Area G1.1 – Ecological Constraints and Opportunities Project: Northern Gateway Client: Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Job Number: A104444-7 File Origin: A104444- 5/Reports/Draft/Volume 2 Revision: 0 Date: December 2019 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Laura Holmes MCIEEM Philip Preston MCIEEM Rachel Kerr CEnv Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist MCIEEM Associate Ecologist Description of revision: First Issue Revision: 1 Date: August 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke ACIEEM Laura Holmes MCIEEM Rachel Kerr CEnv Consultant Ecologist Principal Ecologist MCIEEM Associate Ecologist Description of revision: Update following an extended Phase 1 habitat survey of part of the site and addressing client’s comments Revision: 2 Date: September 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke ACIEEM Laura Holmes MCIEEM Rachel Kerr CEnv Consultant Ecologist Principal Ecologist MCIEEM Associate Ecologist A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 3 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Description of revision: Update to reflect client comments Revision: 3 Date: June 2021 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Samantha Wood Caroline Martin Caroline Martin Description of revision: Accessibility Check A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 4 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Instruction .................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................. 8 1.3 Proposed Development ............................................................................. 9 2.0 Site Setting ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Location and Size .................................................................................... 11 2.2 Site Description ........................................................................................ 11 2.3 Desk Study .............................................................................................. 12 2.3.1 Previous Surveys ........................................................................... 12 2.3.2 Desk Based Study ......................................................................... 13 2.4 2020 Site Surveys .................................................................................... 14 2.5 Limitations ................................................................................................ 14 3.0 Baseline Ecological Conditions ........................................................................ 16 3.1 Desk Study .............................................................................................. 16 3.1.1 Designated Sites and Habitats of Principal Importance ................. 16 3.1.2 Previous Survey ............................................................................. 18 3.2 2020 Update: Habitats ............................................................................. 19 3.3 2020 Update: Protected and Notable Species ......................................... 26 3.3.1 Invertebrates .................................................................................. 26 3.3.2 Amphibians including Great Crested Newt .................................... 27 3.3.3 Reptiles .......................................................................................... 28 3.3.4 Bats ................................................................................................ 29 3.3.5 Birds ............................................................................................... 30 A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 5 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 3.3.6 Badger ........................................................................................... 31 3.3.7 Otter ............................................................................................... 32 3.3.8 Water Vole ..................................................................................... 32 3.3.9 Brown Hare .................................................................................... 32 3.3.10 European Hedgehog ...................................................................... 33 3.3.11 Invasive non-native plant species .................................................. 33 4.0 Constraints and Opportunities .......................................................................... 34 4.1 Constraints ............................................................................................... 37 4.1.1 Biodiversity Net Gain ..................................................................... 37 4.1.2 Internationally Designated Sites ..................................................... 39 4.1.3 Nationally and Locally Designated Sites ........................................ 40 4.1.4 Habitats .......................................................................................... 41 4.1.5 Protected and Notable Species ...................................................... 41 4.2 Opportunities ........................................................................................... 43 4.2.1 Biodiversity Net Gain ..................................................................... 43 4.2.2 Habitats / Protected and Notable Species ..................................... 44 4.3 Next Steps to Assess Constraints and Opportunities ............................... 46 4.3.1 Next Steps – Requirements for Future Planning Application ......... 46 4.3.2 Next Steps - Opportunities ............................................................. 47 4.4 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 47 Appendices ............................................................................................................... 49 National Planning Policy Framework ................................................................ 73 Biodiversity 2020: A strategy for England’s wildlife & ecosystem services ....... 73 Local Biodiversity Action Plan .......................................................................... 74 Local Plans ....................................................................................................... 75 A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 6 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council .................................................................. 75 Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council .......................................................... 79 Drawings A104444-5-MAN-N-01 Site Location Plan A104444-5-MAN-N-301 GMA 1.1 Desk Study Search Area A104444-5-MAN-N-305 GMA 1.1. High Level Constraints Plan Appendices: Appendix A: Report Conditions Appendix B: Wildlife Legislation Appendix B: Relevant Planning Policy and Legislation Appendix C: Survey Calendar A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 7 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 1.0 Introduction WYG has been commissioned by Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP (‘NGDV’) to undertake a high-level desktop and site reconnaissance constraints and opportunities review of a site referred to as Area GMA 1.1 within the proposed Greater Manchester Northern Gateway development area. The site is identified as Allocation GM 1.1 in the draft Greater Manchester Strategic Framework (GMSF). It forms part of the strategic cross-boundary ‘Northern Gateway’ allocation positioned around the intersection of the M60, M62 and M66 Motorways. 1.1 Instruction This desk top assessment and constraints review provides information to support the promotion of GMA 1.1 for allocation in the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF). The findings from the assessment will be used to inform the site masterplan as it is updated and refined This report has assessed the land shown on Figure A104444-5-MAN-N-01. It forms the majority part of proposed allocation GMA 1.1 ‘Heywood/Pilsworth (Northern Gateway)’ in the draft GMSF. The north-eastern part of the proposed allocation already benefits from an outline planning permission for mixed use employment and residential development (the ‘South Heywood’ scheme, granted in March 2020); as such it is not included within this assessment work commissioned by the NGDV. 1.2 Objectives Following a desk top, site reconnaissance, constraints and opportunities review in December 2019 by WYG1, the main body of the site was assessed in greater detail in June 2020; WYG undertook an extended Phase 1 habitat
Recommended publications
  • Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Periodic Review 2005-2015

    Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Periodic Review 2005-2015

    This Periodic Review can also be downloaded at www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/unesco/. Title: Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve. Periodic Review 2005-2015 Authors: This review is produced by the Biosphere Office, Kristianstads kommun: Carina Wettemark, Johanna Källén, Åsa Pearce, Karin Magntorn, Jonas Dahl, Hans Cronert; Karin Hernborg and Ebba Trolle. In addition a large number of people have contributed directly and indirectly. Cover photo: Patrik Olofsson/N Maps: Stadsbyggnadskontoret Kristianstads kommun PERIODIC REVIEW FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVE INTRODUCTION The UNESCO General Conference, at its 28th session, adopted Resolution 28 C/2.4 on the Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. This text defines in particular the criteria for an area to be qualified for designation as a biosphere reserve (Article 4). In addition, Article 9 foresees a periodic review every ten years The periodic review is based on a report prepared by the relevant authority, on the basis of the criteria of Article 4. The periodic review must be submitted by the national MAB Committee to the MAB Secretariat in Paris. The text of the Statutory Framework is presented in the third annex. The form which follows is provided to help States prepare their national reports in accordance with Article 9 and to update the Secretariat's information on the biosphere reserve concerned. This report should enable the International Coordinating Council (ICC) of the MAB Programme to review how each biosphere reserve is fulfilling the criteria of Article 4 of the Statutory Framework and, in particular, the three functions: conservation, development and support. It should be noted that it is requested, in the last part of the form (Criteria and Progress Made), that an indication be given of how the biosphere reserve fulfils each of these criteria.
  • QQR 7 Information Pack

    QQR 7 Information Pack

    7th Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Information Pack (version 2.21) 14 May 2021 1 Version 2.2: Four reptiles and two seals removed from the EPS list (Annex 1); one EPS amphibian and two EPS reptiles that are all Endangered removed from Annex 2 – these species were included in Version 2 and/or 2.1 in error. See Annex 1 and Annex 2 for further information. 1. Introduction Every five years, the country nature conservation bodies (Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot), working jointly through the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), review Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981. The review will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and to Ministers for the Environment in the Scottish Government and Welsh Government for changes to these schedules2. This is known as the Quinquennial Review (QQR). As part of the QQR, stakeholders are provided with the opportunity to propose changes to the species on the schedules. This Information Pack has been produced for the 7th QQR (QQR 7). It is important to note that this QQR differs from previous ones. The Information Pack explains the new selection criteria, provides a timetable, and explains the process to be used by stakeholders. Contact details of the QQR Inter-agency Group who are managing QQR 7, are listed in Section 5. In addition, the Information Pack provides details of how to complete the online survey through which stakeholders propose new species for inclusion on, or removal of existing species from Schedules 5 and 8, or propose a change to how species are protected on the schedules.
  • Wengen - Alpine Flowers of the Swiss Alps

    Wengen - Alpine Flowers of the Swiss Alps

    Wengen - Alpine Flowers of the Swiss Alps Naturetrek Tour Report 21 - 28 June 2015 Report compiled by David Tattersfield Naturetrek Mingledown Barn Wolf's Lane Chawton Alton Hampshire GU34 3HJ UK T: +44 (0)1962 733051 E: [email protected] W: www.naturetrek.co.uk Tour Report Wengen - Alpine Flowers of the Swiss Alps Tour participants: David Tattersfield & Kerrie Porteous (leaders) with 16 Naturetrek clients Day 1 Sunday 21st June We met and Zurich, in the early afternoon, and enjoyed the comfort of the intercity trains to Interlaken. Here we boarded the regional train to Laterbrunnen and finally took the cog-wheel railway, up to Wengen. We arrived at 8pm and made the short walk to our comfortable hotel. Although cloudy, we had a clear view of the imposing north face of the Jungfrau, to the south. After a delicious meal and a brief talk on the plans for the week, we retired to bed, eagerly anticipating the days ahead. Day 2 Monday 22nd June Contrary to the weather forecast, we woke to a brilliant sunny morning. After breakfast, we took the cable car to Mannlichen, where we found ourselves in another world. A vast panorama of snowy peaks filled the southern horizon and we were surrounded by colourful flowers. After looking at a range of commoner plants, on the cliff edge, we set off to explore the slopes towards Mannlichen summit, at 2230 metres. We saw a wide range of habitats, finding new flowers, with every pace. Globeflower Trollius europaeus, Long-spurred Pansy Viola calcarata and Trumpet Gentian Gentiana acaulis made a fine show in the turf, and north-facing banks and cliffs held a rich flora, typical of areas where snow lies late into the season.
  • Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover A104444-7

    Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover A104444-7

    Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover A104444-7 June 2021 Prepared by WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited On behalf of Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP. Quay West at MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1HH Tel: +44 (0)161 872 3223 Fax: +44 (0)161 872 3193 Email: Website: www.wyg.com WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England & Wales Number: 03050297 Registered Office: 3 Sovereign Square, Sovereign Street, Leeds, LS1 4ER Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.2 Document control A104444-7 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.2 Document: Area GMA 1.2 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities: High-Level Walkover Project: Northern Gateway Client: Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Job Number: A104444-7 File Origin: A104444-7/Reports/GMA 1.2 Revision: 0 Date: December 2019 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke Phil Preston MCIEEM Rachel Kerr MCIEEM GradCIEEM Principal Ecologist CEnv Associate Consultant Ecologist Ecologist Description of revision: First Issue Revision: 1 Date: July 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Candice Howe MCIEEM Laura Holmes MCIEEM Phil Preston MCIEEM Senior Ecologist Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist Description of revision: Update following high-level walkover survey undertaken in June 2020 and addressing client’s comments. Revision: 2 Date: September 2020 A104444-7 June 2021 www.wyg.com
  • Current State of Populations of Rhodiola Rosea L. (Crassulaceae) in East Kazakhstan

    Current State of Populations of Rhodiola Rosea L. (Crassulaceae) in East Kazakhstan

    Current State of Populations of Rhodiola Rosea L. (Crassulaceae) in East Kazakhstan Serik Kubentayev Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Moldir Zhumagul ( [email protected] ) Al-Farabi Kazakh National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9467-1483 Meruyert Kurmanbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Daniar Alibekov Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Juri Kotuhov Kotuhov Altai Botanical Garden Gulnara Sitpayeva Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Saule Mukhtubayeva Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Klara Izbastina IBiF: Institute of Botany and Phytointroduction Research Article Keywords: ontogenesis, Kazakh Altai, Central Asia, chorological analysis, life forms, morphological and quantitative indicators Posted Date: June 4th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-520767/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/36 Abstract Background: Based on world experience, rst, a modern assessment of the ora is needed to develop strategies and tactics for the conservation of ecosystems of rare and endangered plant species. A regional and global biodiversity strategy should focus on assessing the current state of bioresources. In this regard, to preserve the biodiversity, the botanical features, the ontogenetic state, the ecological and phytocenotic structure of the rare endangered species Rh. rosea in the highlands of Eastern Kazakhstan were studied. Results: Ten populations of Rh. rosea were identied under various ecological and geomorphological conditions with a detailed description of the structure of the plant community. Systematic analysis of the plant community with Rh. rosea shows that the families Poaceae Barnhart, Ranunculaceae Juss., Asteraceae Bercht, J. Presl, Rosaceae Juss. and the leaders in the number of species are Caryophyllaceae Juss., Apiaceae Lindl., Fabaceae Lindl., Polygonaceae Juss.
  • Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon

    Portland State University PDXScholar Institute for Natural Resources Publications Institute for Natural Resources - Portland 8-2016 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon James S. Kagan Portland State University Sue Vrilakas Portland State University, [email protected] John A. Christy Portland State University Eleanor P. Gaines Portland State University Lindsey Wise Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Biology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Oregon Biodiversity Information Center. 2016. Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species of Oregon. Institute for Natural Resources, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 130 pp. This Book is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute for Natural Resources Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors James S. Kagan, Sue Vrilakas, John A. Christy, Eleanor P. Gaines, Lindsey Wise, Cameron Pahl, and Kathy Howell This book is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/naturalresources_pub/25 RARE, THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES OF OREGON OREGON BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION CENTER August 2016 Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Institute for Natural Resources Portland State University P.O. Box 751,
  • Water Use Impacts in LCA: Part I—Inventory Modelling and Characterisation Factors for the Main Impact Pathways

    Water Use Impacts in LCA: Part I—Inventory Modelling and Characterisation Factors for the Main Impact Pathways

    DELIVERABLE FRONTPAGE Project number: 243827 FP7-ENV-2009-1 Project acronym: LC-IMPACT Project title: Development and application of environmental Life Cycle Impact assessment Methods for improved sustainability Characterisation of Technologies. Deliverable number: D 1.7 Deliverable name: Recommended assessment framework, method and characterisation factors and normalisation factors for water resource use impacts (phase 3) Version: 1.2 WP number: 1 Lead beneficiary: ETH Nature: R1 Dissemination level: RE2 Delivery date Annex I: 41 (month number) Actual delivery date: May 3, 2013 (updated September 30, 2013) Authors: Assumpció Anton, Marlia M. Hanafiah, Stefanie Hellweg, Mark A.J. Huijbregts, Ronnie Juraske, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Montse Núñez, Stephan Pfister, Catherine Raptis, Dominik Saner, Franziska Stössel, Rosalie van Zelm, Francesca Verones (alphabetical order) Comments: Several parts of this deliverable will be published in scientific journals and need to be treated confidentially until the publishing date (for internal EU review only). 1 Please indicate the nature of the deliverable using one of the following codes: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other 2 Please indicate the dissemination level using one of the following codes: PU = Public, PP = Restricted to other programme participants (incl. the Commission Services), RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (incl. the Commission Services), CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (incl. the Commission Services) 1 Table of Contents
  • Biosystems Diversity, 26(2), 160–169

    Biosystems Diversity, 26(2), 160–169

    ISSN 2519-8513 (Print) Biosystems ISSN 2520-2529 (Online) Biosyst. Divers., 26(2), 160–169 doi: 10.15421/011825 Diversity Long-term dynamics of flora of karst lakes: Changes and current state E. A. Belyakov*, **, E. V. Garin* *Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, Borok, Russia **Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets, Russia Article info Belyakov, E. A., & Garin, E. V. (2018). Long-term dynamics of flora of karst lakes: Changes and current state. Received 19.04.2018 Biosystems Diversity, 26(2), 160–169. doi:10.15421/011825 Received in revised form 07.05.2018 Long-term observations of the rates and pattern of changes in flora and vegetation contribute to understanding of one Accepted 10.05.2018 of the most important contemporary global problems, the eutrophication of water bodies. In this study, using classical floristic methods, we attempt to determine (for a period of almost 80 years) the nature and possible causes of changes in I. D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters RAS, the floristic composition of the lakes of karst origin, Velikoe and Parovoe (Pustinskaya lake-river system, the right bank of Borok, 152742, Yaroslavl Nizhny Novgorod oblast). The paper shows that over a long period of observations a significant transformation of the Oblast, Russia. vegetation cover has occurred in the lakes. The process was accompanied by the disappearance of a number of native Tel.: +748-547-24-042 species and appearance of others, including adventitious ones (for example, Elodea canadensis Michx., Zizania latifolia E-mail: [email protected] (Griseb.) Stapf, Bidens frondosa L. and Epilobium adenocaulon Hausskn.).
  • A Floristic Study of Vascular Plants in Ushishir, the Middle Kuril Islands

    A Floristic Study of Vascular Plants in Ushishir, the Middle Kuril Islands

    J. Jpn. Bot. 91 Suppl.: 68–82 (2016) A Floristic Study of Vascular Plants in Ushishir, the Middle Kuril Islands a, b Hideki TAKAHASHI * and Vyacheslav Yu. BARKALOV aThe Hokkaido University Museum, Sappporo, 060-0810 JAPAN; bInstitute of Biology and Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Far Eastern Branch, Vladivostok, 690022 RUSSIA *Corresponding author: [email protected] (Accepted on January 9, 2016) A preliminary list of vascular plants is provided for the southern Yankicha and northern Ryponkicha islets of Ushishir, the middle Kuril Islands, based on herbarium specimens. The list represents 45 families, 114 genera, and 158 species for the whole of Ushishir. Only two species of non-native plants have been recorded from Ushishir- Yankicha. The main dominant families in Ushishir are Asteraceae, Poaceae, Cyperaceae, and Caryophyllaceae. Although the entire flora of Ushishir does not show distinguishing features different from those of adjacent Ketoi and Rasshua, a clear contrast of floristic composition was confirmed between Yankicha and Ryponkicha in Ushishir. Notably, a higher number of species and collections of Cyperaceae in Ryponkicha than in Yankicha was confirmed. A Ryponkicha bias is evident in several taxa, for example Rubus chamaemorus, Vaccinium uliginosum var. alpinum, Carex rariflora, and C. stylosa. The floristic contrast mainly reflects the common occurrence of herbaceous meadows on Yankicha and the presence of a shrubby heath community on the terrace of Ryponkicha. A clear difference of flora and vegetation between Yankicha and Ryponkicha may be due to the different topographical and geological features of the two islets. Key words: Middle Kurils, Ryponkicha, Ushishir, Yankicha. The Kuril Islands extend about 1200 km Hokkaido and 470 km southwest of Kamchatka between Hokkaido and the Kamchatka peninsula (Fig.
  • Searchable PDF Created by OCR.Space (Free Version) 8:47-48

    Searchable PDF Created by OCR.Space (Free Version) 8:47-48

    podobně nerozlišoval DOMIN (Preslia 13—15:233, 1936), anastředomořskýchostrovech:z. Asie najih po Kavkaz. Ve který v seznamutaxonů uvedl pouze Chrysanthemum mari- str.aj, Evropěsnadjenjako archeofyt, —Mapy: ZAJACRozp. timum (L.) PERS.,mezi jehož synonyma zařadil jak Matrica- Habil. Univ. Jagiell. 29: 124, 1979; ZAJACZesz. Nauk. Univ. ria maritima L., tak i M. inodora L. Jagiell.,pr.bot., 17:43, 1986;HULTĚNcp 1971:296: HULTĚN NE 1986:905; MEUSEL et al. 1992:480. Ekologie a cenologie: Pouze na synan- tropních stanovištích v raných fázích sukcese Mezirodový kříženec Anthemis x Tripleuros- (v žádné části areálu není známý z přirozených permum je za rodem Anthemis (str. 232), mezi- biotopů): rumiště,okrajekomunikací,úhory,pole, rodový kříženec Matricaria x Tripleurospermum odvaly lomů, výsypky, navážky,haldy, štěrkovny je za rodem Matricaria (str. 248). a hliníky, též v jednoleté vegetaci písčin, na růz- Poznámka:*) V letech 1958—1961 se v Brně pře- ných substrátech včetně zasolených; místy tvoří chodne vyskytoval s australskou vlnou zavlečený mechovec souvislý pruh na krajnicích solených silnic. Nej- australský, Cotula australis (SIEBERex SPRENGEL)HOOKER častěji ve společenstvech svazu Sisymbrion offi- fil. (Bot. Antarct. Voy. 2:128. 1852). původem z Austrálie cinalis s přesahemdo společenstevsvazů Dauco- a Nového Zélandu (blíže DVOŘÁK et KÜHN Preslia 38:329, -Melilotion, Chenopodion glauci, Polygonion 1966). Je to jednoletá. měkce chlupatá bylina až 30 cm vys., avicularis, též v subhalofilních nitrofilních spo- s větvenou a poléhavou lodyhou. Listy jsou střídavé, řapíkaté, lečenstvech pravidelně zaplavovaných stanovišť v obrysueliptické, 2—3cm dl., 2x peřenosečnév čárkovité úkrojky.Úborykoncové,jednotlivé.4—5cm v průměru,na (podsvaz Loto- Trifolienion). tenkých stopkách; zákrov 2—3řadý,zákrovní listeny podlou- Rozšíření v CR: V celém území velmi hle kopinaté.
  • List of Alaskan Seed Plant and Fern Names Compiled from ALA, ACCS, PAF, WCSP, FNA

    List of Alaskan Seed Plant and Fern Names Compiled from ALA, ACCS, PAF, WCSP, FNA

    List of Alaskan Seed Plant and Fern names Compiled from ALA, ACCS, PAF, WCSP, FNA (Questions to [email protected]) January 18, 2020 Acoraceae Acorus americanus (Raf.) Raf. (GUID: trop-2100001). In Alaska according to ALA, FNA. An accepted name according to ALA, FNA.A synonym of: • Acorus calamus var. americanus Raf. according to WCSP ; Comments: WCSP Acorus calamus L. (GUID: ipni-84009-1). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to WCSP, ACCS. Adoxaceae Adoxa moschatellina L. (GUID: ipni-5331-2). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF, WCSP, ACCS. Sambucus pubens Michx. (GUID: ipni-227191-2). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to WCSP, ALA.A synonym of: • Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) Hultén according to PAF ; Comments: Subspecies [pubens] reaches the Arctic in southwestern Alaska. This hardy race is introduced in northern Norway and Iceland, escaping in Iceland, and may be found in the arctic parts. • Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) House according to ACCS ; Comments: Panarctic Flora Checklist Sambucus racemosa L. (GUID: ipni-30056767-2). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, WCSP, ACCS. Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) House (GUID: NULL). In Alaska according to ACCS. An accepted name according to ACCS. Sambucus racemosa subsp. pubens (Michx.) Hultén (GUID: ipni-227221-2). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF. Viburnum edule (Michx.) Raf. (GUID: ipni-149665-1). In Alaska according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. An accepted name according to ALA, PAF, ACCS. Viburnum opulus L.
  • Ecological Survey

    Ecological Survey

    Wandsworth Estate - The Alders Estate Ecological Appraisal For Wandsworth Borough Council August 2019 11th Floor, 1 Angel Court, London, EC2R 7HJ 020 7250 7783 [email protected] www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands Wandsworth Estate - The Alders Estate: Ecological Appraisal Document Control Project: Wandsworth Estate - The Alders Estate Client: Wandsworth Borough Council Job Number: A100140-36 File Origin: \\lds-dc-vm-002\Group Ecology\Projects\Projects A100000 on\A100140-36 Wandsworth Estate Renewal Tender\REPORTS\The Alders Estate Version 1 8th August 2019 FINAL Georgia Alfreds ACIEEM Prepared by: Project Ecologist Richard J Penson MCIEEM Checked By: Project Ecologist Vivienne Greenough MCIEEM Verified By: Associate Ecologist Version: Date: Updated by: Verified by: Description of changes: WYG Environment Planning Transport Ltd. accept no responsibility or liability for the use which is made of this document other than by the Client for the purpose for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. Wandsworth Borough Council i August 2019 A100140-36 Wandsworth Estate - The Alders Estate: Ecological Appraisal Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 1 Glossary ................................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................