DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Use Impacts in LCA: Part I—Inventory Modelling and Characterisation Factors for the Main Impact Pathways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Use Impacts in LCA: Part I—Inventory Modelling and Characterisation Factors for the Main Impact Pathways DELIVERABLE FRONTPAGE Project number: 243827 FP7-ENV-2009-1 Project acronym: LC-IMPACT Project title: Development and application of environmental Life Cycle Impact assessment Methods for improved sustainability Characterisation of Technologies. Deliverable number: D 1.7 Deliverable name: Recommended assessment framework, method and characterisation factors and normalisation factors for water resource use impacts (phase 3) Version: 1.2 WP number: 1 Lead beneficiary: ETH Nature: R1 Dissemination level: RE2 Delivery date Annex I: 41 (month number) Actual delivery date: May 3, 2013 (updated September 30, 2013) Authors: Assumpció Anton, Marlia M. Hanafiah, Stefanie Hellweg, Mark A.J. Huijbregts, Ronnie Juraske, Llorenç Milà i Canals, Montse Núñez, Stephan Pfister, Catherine Raptis, Dominik Saner, Franziska Stössel, Rosalie van Zelm, Francesca Verones (alphabetical order) Comments: Several parts of this deliverable will be published in scientific journals and need to be treated confidentially until the publishing date (for internal EU review only). 1 Please indicate the nature of the deliverable using one of the following codes: R = Report, P = Prototype, D = Demonstrator, O = Other 2 Please indicate the dissemination level using one of the following codes: PU = Public, PP = Restricted to other programme participants (incl. the Commission Services), RE = Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (incl. the Commission Services), CO = Confidential, only for members of the consortium (incl. the Commission Services) 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................2 List of abbreviations ............................................................................................................................8 Definitions ........................................................................................................................................ 10 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 11 1. Characterization factors for water consumption and greenhouse gas emissions based on freshwater fish species extinction ............................................................................................ 16 1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 17 1.1.1 Framework..................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.2 Water Consumption ...................................................................................................... 18 1.1.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................................................ 19 1.1.4 Normalization ................................................................................................................ 20 1.3. Results ................................................................................................................................... 20 1.1.5 Water Consumption ...................................................................................................... 20 1.1.6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions............................................................................................ 20 1.1.7 Normalization ................................................................................................................ 21 1.4. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 22 1.2.1 Fate factors .................................................................................................................... 22 1.2.2 Effect factors ................................................................................................................. 23 1.2.3 Implications ................................................................................................................... 24 1.5. References ............................................................................................................................. 24 2. Surface water use – human health impacts ............................................................................. 27 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 27 2.1.1. Characterization Factors ................................................................................................ 27 2.1.2. Concept.......................................................................................................................... 28 2.1.3. Spatial scope and resolution ......................................................................................... 28 2.2. Model and parameter uncertainties ..................................................................................... 28 2.3. Error propagation .................................................................................................................. 29 2.4. Results ................................................................................................................................... 30 2.5. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 34 2.6. References ............................................................................................................................. 34 2 3. Implementing groundwater extraction in life cycle impact assessment: characterization factors based on plant species richness ................................................................................... 35 3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 35 3.2. Methods ................................................................................................................................ 36 3.2.1. Characterization factor .................................................................................................. 36 3.2.2. Fate factor ..................................................................................................................... 36 3.2.3. Effect factor ................................................................................................................... 37 3.2.4. Cultural perspectives ..................................................................................................... 39 3.2.5. LCA application .............................................................................................................. 40 3.3. Results ................................................................................................................................... 40 3.4. Discussion .............................................................................................................................. 43 3.4.1. Fate factors .................................................................................................................... 43 3.4.2. Effect factor ................................................................................................................... 44 3.4.3. Application in LCA studies ............................................................................................. 45 3.5. References ................................................................................................................................ 45 4. Quantifying area changes of internationally important wetlands due to water consumption in LCA ............................................................................................................................................ 48 4.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 48 4.2. Methods ................................................................................................................................... 49 4.2.1. Wetland distribution and classification ............................................................................. 49 4.2.2. Wetland areas ................................................................................................................... 49 4.2.3. Calculation of fate factors (FF) .......................................................................................... 50 4.2.4. Fate factors for surface water-fed wetlands ..................................................................... 51 4.2.5. Groundwater-fed wetlands ............................................................................................... 52 4.2.6. Sensitivity analysis ............................................................................................................. 54 4.2.7. Coupling with the inventory .............................................................................................. 55 4.3. Results ...................................................................................................................................... 55 4.3.1. Fate factors .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pops in South Asia Status and Environmental Health Impacts
    POPs in South Asia Status and environmental health impacts A survey of the available information of POPs in the South East Asian Region. The information is examined to reveal the nature and extent of the POPs problem. July 2004; Toxics Link Acknowledgements: The report entailed extensive research work involving data collection from various research institutes and organizations. We have been much assisted in our endeavor at data collection by scientists from Industrial Toxicological Research Institute (ITRC), National Institute of Occupational Heath (NIOH), National Environmental Engineering Re- search Institute (NEERI), NIO, Regional Research Laboratory (RRL) Trivandrum, Consumer Education Research Center (CERC), Institute for Toxicological Studies (INTOX), Bhaba Atomic Research Centre (BARC), Malaria Research Centre (MRC), Ministry of Environment and Forest (MOEF), Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Central Electricity Authority (CEA), Power Grid Corporation, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Bose Institute, Centre for Study of Man and Environment (CSME), Centre for Science and environment (CSE), Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History (SACON), Wildlife Institute of India (WII), National Anti Malaria Program (NAMP), Educational Research Institute ERI (Pakistan), The Central Pulp and Paper Research Institute (CPPRI), Confederation of Indian Industries (CII), Delhi University, Jadavpur University, Kolkata University, Kalyani University, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay, Karachi University and Indian Agriculture Re- search Institute (IARI). We are also thankful to all the scientists who have spared their time, informally interacting with us and sharing their knowledge and experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Periodic Review 2005-2015
    This Periodic Review can also be downloaded at www.vattenriket.kristianstad.se/unesco/. Title: Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve. Periodic Review 2005-2015 Authors: This review is produced by the Biosphere Office, Kristianstads kommun: Carina Wettemark, Johanna Källén, Åsa Pearce, Karin Magntorn, Jonas Dahl, Hans Cronert; Karin Hernborg and Ebba Trolle. In addition a large number of people have contributed directly and indirectly. Cover photo: Patrik Olofsson/N Maps: Stadsbyggnadskontoret Kristianstads kommun PERIODIC REVIEW FOR BIOSPHERE RESERVE INTRODUCTION The UNESCO General Conference, at its 28th session, adopted Resolution 28 C/2.4 on the Statutory Framework of the World Network of Biosphere Reserves. This text defines in particular the criteria for an area to be qualified for designation as a biosphere reserve (Article 4). In addition, Article 9 foresees a periodic review every ten years The periodic review is based on a report prepared by the relevant authority, on the basis of the criteria of Article 4. The periodic review must be submitted by the national MAB Committee to the MAB Secretariat in Paris. The text of the Statutory Framework is presented in the third annex. The form which follows is provided to help States prepare their national reports in accordance with Article 9 and to update the Secretariat's information on the biosphere reserve concerned. This report should enable the International Coordinating Council (ICC) of the MAB Programme to review how each biosphere reserve is fulfilling the criteria of Article 4 of the Statutory Framework and, in particular, the three functions: conservation, development and support. It should be noted that it is requested, in the last part of the form (Criteria and Progress Made), that an indication be given of how the biosphere reserve fulfils each of these criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • QQR 7 Information Pack
    7th Quinquennial Review of Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981) Information Pack (version 2.21) 14 May 2021 1 Version 2.2: Four reptiles and two seals removed from the EPS list (Annex 1); one EPS amphibian and two EPS reptiles that are all Endangered removed from Annex 2 – these species were included in Version 2 and/or 2.1 in error. See Annex 1 and Annex 2 for further information. 1. Introduction Every five years, the country nature conservation bodies (Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and NatureScot), working jointly through the UK Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), review Schedules 5 and 8 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (WCA) 1981. The review will provide recommendations to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and to Ministers for the Environment in the Scottish Government and Welsh Government for changes to these schedules2. This is known as the Quinquennial Review (QQR). As part of the QQR, stakeholders are provided with the opportunity to propose changes to the species on the schedules. This Information Pack has been produced for the 7th QQR (QQR 7). It is important to note that this QQR differs from previous ones. The Information Pack explains the new selection criteria, provides a timetable, and explains the process to be used by stakeholders. Contact details of the QQR Inter-agency Group who are managing QQR 7, are listed in Section 5. In addition, the Information Pack provides details of how to complete the online survey through which stakeholders propose new species for inclusion on, or removal of existing species from Schedules 5 and 8, or propose a change to how species are protected on the schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • HAUSTORIUM 45 August 2004 1 HAUSTORIUM Parasitic Plants Newsletter
    HAUSTORIUM 45 August 2004 1 HAUSTORIUM Parasitic Plants Newsletter Official Organ of the International Parasitic Plant Society August 2005 Number 45 IPPS –A MESSAGE FROM THE SECRETARY Science Congress (IWSC), by which the parasitic weed researchers were exposed to the broader scope Dear IPPS Members, of weed science and the IWSC participants could Our most recent Symposium on Parasitic Weeds, take part in presentations and discussions during our which took place in Durban (South Africa) last Symposium. We are grateful to the organizers of the June, was a wonderful occasion to learn about IWSC, and in particular to Baruch Rubin, Vice- progress in many areas of parasitic plant research, to President of the IWSS and member of our Board, discuss new ideas, to meet old friends and for help and encouragement regarding the colleagues, and to make new acquaintances. Let me coordination of these two scientific meetings. take this opportunity to once again thank everyone The International Scientific Committee, with who contributed to the meeting; it was in many representative of the major areas of parasitic plant ways a resounding success! research and control, evaluated all submitted The International Parasitic Plants Society was abstracts, and the final program was constructed inaugurated during the International Parasitic according to their recommendations. We happily Weeds Conference in Nantes. Due to some legal thank all members of the committee for their difficulties it was possible to officially register the contribution to the success of the Symposium. The IPPS as an international society only in 2002. The Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Board of Directors provided the Executive Parasitic Weeds can be downloaded from the IPPS Committee with recommendations that are now website at http://www.ppws.vt.edu/IPPS/ .
    [Show full text]
  • 2013, XLVIII: 27-37 Grădina Botanică “Alexandru Borza” Cluj-Napoca
    Contribuţii Botanice – 2013, XLVIII: 27-37 Grădina Botanică “Alexandru Borza” Cluj-Napoca THE PRESENCE OF VERONICA SPECIES IN DIFFERENT NATURA 2000 HABITAT TYPES IN ROMANIA Silvia OROIAN,1 Mihaela SĂMĂRGHIŢAN2 1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Târgu-Mureş, Faculty of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Botany and Cell Biology Department, 38 Gh. Marinescu Street, RO-540139 Târgu-Mureş, Romania 2 Mureş County Museum, Natural Science Department, 24 Horea Street, RO-540036 Târgu-Mureş, Romania e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: A principal objective of this study was to summarise the distribution of Veronica species in Romania, where such an inventory has not existed before. Taxa of Veronica genus were identified in 311 plant associations and 36 subassociations framed in 132 alliances. Of the 311 plant associations, 138 are included in various types of NATURA 2000 Habitats. The review of phytosociological data reveals the presence of Veronica taxa in 42 types of Natura 2000 habitats with scientific significance. Some of these Veronica taxa are characteristic species for alliances (i.e. Veronicion baumgartenii Coldea 1991, Veronico officinalis-Quercion Pop 1971) or differential species at plant association level (Veronico baumgartenii-Saxifragetum bryoidis Boşcaiu et al. 1977). Keywords: Veronica genus, Natura 2000 habitats, plant associations Introduction Veronica is considered among the richest genera of the vascular flora of Romania as well as of other European countries. As regards their systematic position, Veronica species were included until recently in the Scrophularioideae (Antirrhinoideae) subfamily, Scrophulariaceae family, Scrophulariales order, Asterideae subclass, Magnoliopsida class [7]. Because there are several classification systems for this genus, here we mention three of them, which we consider most recent.
    [Show full text]
  • Detailed Species Accounts from The
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PREFACE The report in hand is the Final (updated October 2006) of the Integrated Social & Environmental Assessment (ISEA) for proposed Water Sector Improvement Project (WSIP). This report encompasses the research, investigations, analysis and conclusions of a study carried out by M/s Osmani & Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., Consulting Engineers for the Institutional Reforms Consultant (IRC) of Sindh Irrigation & Drainage Authority (SIDA). The Proposed Water Sector Improvement Project (WSIP) Phase-I, being negotiated between Government of Sindh and the World Bank entails a number of interventions aimed at improving the water management and institutional reforms in the province of Sindh. The second largest province in Pakistan, Sindh has approx. 5.0 Million Ha of farm area irrigated through three barrages and 14 canals. The canal command areas of Sindh are planned to be converted into 14 Area Water Boards (AWBs) whereby the management, operations and maintenance would be carried out by elected bodies. Similarly the distributaries and watercourses are to be managed by Farmers Organizations (FOs) and Watercourse Associations (WCAs), respectively. The Project focuses on the three established Area Water Boards (AWBs) of Nara, Left Bank (Akram Wah & Phuleli Canal) & Ghotki Feeder. The major project interventions include the following targets:- • Improvement of 9 main canals (726 Km) and 37 branch canals (1,441 Km). This includes new lining of 50% length of the lined reach of Akram Wah. • Control of Direct Outlets • Replacement of APMs with agreed type of modules • Improvement of 173 distributaries and minor canals (1527 Km) including 145 Km of geomembrane lining and 112 Km of concrete lining in 3 AWBs.
    [Show full text]
  • Floristic Quality Assessment Report
    FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN INDIANA: THE CONCEPT, USE, AND DEVELOPMENT OF COEFFICIENTS OF CONSERVATISM Tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) the State tree of Indiana June 2004 Final Report for ARN A305-4-53 EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01 Prepared by: Paul E. Rothrock, Ph.D. Taylor University Upland, IN 46989-1001 Introduction Since the early nineteenth century the Indiana landscape has undergone a massive transformation (Jackson 1997). In the pre-settlement period, Indiana was an almost unbroken blanket of forests, prairies, and wetlands. Much of the land was cleared, plowed, or drained for lumber, the raising of crops, and a range of urban and industrial activities. Indiana’s native biota is now restricted to relatively small and often isolated tracts across the State. This fragmentation and reduction of the State’s biological diversity has challenged Hoosiers to look carefully at how to monitor further changes within our remnant natural communities and how to effectively conserve and even restore many of these valuable places within our State. To meet this monitoring, conservation, and restoration challenge, one needs to develop a variety of appropriate analytical tools. Ideally these techniques should be simple to learn and apply, give consistent results between different observers, and be repeatable. Floristic Assessment, which includes metrics such as the Floristic Quality Index (FQI) and Mean C values, has gained wide acceptance among environmental scientists and decision-makers, land stewards, and restoration ecologists in Indiana’s neighboring states and regions: Illinois (Taft et al. 1997), Michigan (Herman et al. 1996), Missouri (Ladd 1996), and Wisconsin (Bernthal 2003) as well as northern Ohio (Andreas 1993) and southern Ontario (Oldham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • (Linaria Vulgaris) and Dalmatian Toadflax (Linaria
    DISSERTATION VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Submitted by Marie F.S. Turner Department of Soil and Crop Sciences In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Fall 2012 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Sarah Ward Christopher Richards David Steingraeber George Beck Sharlene Sing Copyright by Marie Frances Sundem Turner 2012 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT VIABILITY AND INVASIVE POTENTIAL OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN YELLOW TOADFLAX (LINARIA VULGARIS) AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX (LINARIA DALMATICA) Although outcomes of hybridization are highly variable, it is now considered to play an important role in evolution, speciation, and invasion. Hybridization has recently been confirmed between populations of yellow (or common) toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) and Dalmatian toadflax (Linaria dalmatica) in the Rocky Mountain region of the United States. The presence of hybrid toadflax populations on public lands is of concern, as both parents are aggressive invaders already listed as noxious weeds in multiple western states. A common garden experiment was designed to measure differences in quantitative (shoot length, biomass, flowering stems, seed capsule production) phenological (time of emergence, first flowering and seed maturity) and ecophysiological (photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency (WUE)) traits for yellow and Dalmatian toadflax, F1 and BC1 hybrids, as well as natural field-collected hybrids from two sites. Genotypes were cloned to produce true replicates and the entire common garden was also replicated at two locations (Colorado and Montana); physiological data were collected only in Colorado. All genotypes grew larger and were more reproductively active in Colorado than in Montana, and hybrids outperformed parent taxa across vegetative and reproductive traits indicating heterosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Functional Characterization of the First Two
    Identification and functional characterization of the first two aromatic prenyltransferases implicated in the biosynthesis of furanocoumarins and prenylated coumarins in two plant families: Rutaceae and Apiaceae Fazeelat Karamat To cite this version: Fazeelat Karamat. Identification and functional characterization of the first two aromatic prenyl- transferases implicated in the biosynthesis of furanocoumarins and prenylated coumarins in two plant families: Rutaceae and Apiaceae. Agronomy. Université de Lorraine, 2013. English. NNT : 2013LORR0029. tel-01749560 HAL Id: tel-01749560 https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-01749560 Submitted on 29 Mar 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat,
    [Show full text]
  • Annexes to the Bioscore Report: a Tool to Assess the Impacts of European Community Policies on Europe’S Biodiversity
    Annexes to the BioScore report: A tool to assess the impacts of European Community policies on Europe’s biodiversity Edited by Ben Delbaere Ana Nieto Serradilla Mark Snethlage (Eds) ECNC, Tilburg, the Netherlands, 2009 The report can be consulted on www.bioscore.eu and www.ecnc.org Annex 1. List of environmental variables as derived from species data availability and literature sources Annex 2. Species list with sensitivity scores Annex 3. List of references considered in BioScore for distribution ranges and ecological requirements Annex 4. Technical description of the BioScore tool and database Annex 5. Additional results from case study on afforestation in Italy Annex 6. Additional results from prospective case study of biofuel crop production Annex 7. Test with random set of species Annex 1 List of environmental variables as derived from species data availability and literature sources Environmental variables Biogeographical region Land cover ( CLC classes) Dispersal capacity Dispersal capacity minimum Dispersal capacity maximum Elevation Minimum elevation Maximum elevation Optimum elevation minimum Optimum elevation maximum Light Temperature Continentality Soil moisture Soil acidity Nitrogen availability Salt tolerance Habitat patch size (minimum area requirement) Habitat patch size minimum Habitat patch size maximum Habitat structure Population size Host/nectar plant Influence roads Permanent water surface Temporary water availability Exchange between watersheds Water flow (reduced) Water quality sensitivity Water acidification Water
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.1 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities A104444-7
    Northern Gateway Area GMA 1.1 - Ecological Constraints and Opportunities A104444-7 June 2021 Prepared by WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited On behalf of Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Quay West at MediaCityUK, Trafford Wharf Road, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1HH Tel: +44 (0)161 872 3223 Fax: +44 (0)161 872 3193 Email: Website: www.wyg.com WYG Environment Planning Transport Limited. Registered in England & Wales Number: 03050297 Registered Office: 3 Sovereign Square, Sovereign Street, Leeds, LS1 4ER Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Document control A104444-5 June 2021 www.wyg.com creative minds safe hands 2 Northern Gateway – High-Level Constraints – Area GMA 1.1 Document: Area G1.1 – Ecological Constraints and Opportunities Project: Northern Gateway Client: Northern Gateway Development Vehicle LLP Job Number: A104444-7 File Origin: A104444- 5/Reports/Draft/Volume 2 Revision: 0 Date: December 2019 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Laura Holmes MCIEEM Philip Preston MCIEEM Rachel Kerr CEnv Principal Ecologist Principal Ecologist MCIEEM Associate Ecologist Description of revision: First Issue Revision: 1 Date: August 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke ACIEEM Laura Holmes MCIEEM Rachel Kerr CEnv Consultant Ecologist Principal Ecologist MCIEEM Associate Ecologist Description of revision: Update following an extended Phase 1 habitat survey of part of the site and addressing client’s comments Revision: 2 Date: September 2020 Prepared by: Checked by: Approved By: Jessica Yorke
    [Show full text]