DOCSLIB.ORG

South Gloucestershire Council Boundary Review Liberal Democrat Group Submission June 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
South Gloucestershire Council Boundary Review Liberal Democrat Group Submission June 2017 South Gloucestershire Council Boundary Review Liberal Democrat Group Submission June 2017 This submission is from the Liberal Democrat group on South Gloucestershire Council. The Lib Dems are the second largest group on the council, and one of only two to ever have had an overall majority. As such, there is a good understanding of community links, and history, across much of the district. In our submission we have focussed upon the areas where we have deep community roots, stretching back over 40 years. In those areas we know the communities well, so feel we can make submissions which reflect the nuances of natural communities. However, there are some areas where we do feel others are better placed to identify the nuances. In those areas we have not sought to offer detailed solutions. We believe communities and individuals in those areas are best placed to provide their local solutions. We have submitted specific plans for the district over the areas where we have a good understanding, and believe our proposals are powerful, rooted in strong community identities, and efficient local government. All of the proposals are within the permissible variance from the new electoral quota with 61 Councillors, and we do not believe this needs to be modified up or down to make the map work. South Gloucestershire elects in an “all-up” manner, which means under Commission guidance, a mixture of 1, 2, and 3 member wards is appropriate, which we have proposed. We have proposed no ‘doughnut’, or detached wards, and many of the proposals allow for the reunification of communities which have previously been separated by imposed political boundaries. The outside edge of South Gloucestershire can be considered a ‘hard’ border – although within the district, existing polling districts and wards can, and should be split, the external boundary cannot be moved. Three rural wards, up against this border, make up around a third of the land area of the entire authority. As some of their boundaries are unalterable by the parameters of the review, it seems sensible to start with these, and work inwards. Rural Areas Charfield Ward – Projected electorate 3,533. Variance -6%. 1 Member. The existing Charfield Ward would be slightly undersized, but within the variance limits allowed. The existing community links are well established, and the ward is relatively compact for the area it covers, with a vaguely rectangular shape. Extensive development is planned for the Charfield area, in both the adopted core strategy, and the new draft joint strategic plan. The ward should be undersized at the time of adoption to allow for that, as there will be a rapid population increase in the future, both up to 2023 and beyond, and a larger ward would result in one well over the ideal size and would create an artificial boundary. This review is only considering population changes up to 2023, but even to that point, rapid planned expansion means that the existing ward is well within the deviation allowed from the new, larger, electoral quota. We propose no change to the existing borders, which would elect a single Councillor. This ward contains the four Civil Parishes of Charfield, Cromhall, Tortworth, and Falfield. The total borders of the four Parishes are coterminous with the borders of the ward, and aid efficient local government by meaning a single Councillor covers their entire areas, and no other. Cotswold Edge – Projected electorate 4,132. Variance 10%. 1 Member. Cotswold Edge is by far the largest geographical ward in the authority, stretching down the eastern border, and, as the name suggests, covering the Cotswold Edge, a dramatic escarpment separating the Cotswold Hills from the surrounding lowlands. It is has a very strong historic identity, being Cotswold villages all very much linked through a set of social and community networks of the escarpment communities, with their links to the Beaufort network. They have more in common with communities across the county border than to the communities to the west. The existing ward would be too small in terms of population to continue unchanged. We propose a relatively minor alteration, attaching the polling district of BVD, from the existing Boyd Valley ward. The addition of the town of Marshfield would give Cotswold Edge the population it needs to be a viable ward, without adding too much additional land area for a single Councillor to cover. The existing Cotswold Edge ward already goes south past the M4 motorway, to the village of West Littleton, whose primary road continues south to Marshfield. Marshfield is very much a Cotswold edge town, perched up on the escarpment. Marshfield has a population of around 1,200, very similar to Hawkesbury Upton which is the current principal settlement of the ward. This proposal would create a single member ward covering a variety of separate communities, but ones which all share common features to their identity, and a shared aspect of rural towns and villages, on the edge of the Cotswolds. The transport links between the communities run north-south entirely within the proposed ward, and there is no obvious reason to stop the ward where it currently does; there is no physical boundary, such as a major road, railway, or river. As most of the communities down the eastern border of the district are currently politically linked together, separating Marshfield at the southern edge into a different ward than the rest of the Cotswold Edge has been a historic anomaly which can now be repaired. The proposed new ward would mean South Gloucestershire’s area of the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty was almost entirely within a single ward, rather than being split between two as is currently the case. It is important to note that although Cotswold Edge is near to other settlements, such as Chipping Sodbury, the character of community found within them is extremely different. Chipping Sodbury is an old market town, largely integrated with the Yate urban area. In community terms, it has nothing in common with the small towns and villages of the Cotswold edge. Although Cotswold residents may access services in Chipping Sodbury, the communities within Cotswold edge have identities built on their rural character. This should be preserved, in accordance with the Commission guidelines for wards to reflect community identity. Efficient government is provided in large part by links such as the A46, which runs north to south through almost the entire new ward, centrally in the top half, and as the western border for the lower half. The ward boundary would shift to the east of the A46 a few miles above the southern boundary of the district, in order to exclude Cold Ashton and Pennsylvania (Polling District BVA) which would remain in the Boyd Valley rural ward. The new ward would be at the upper limit of population for a single Councillor. Considering the strong community of interests represented in this area, the relatively large – and entirely permissible – number of electors seems a reasonable compromise. Severn – Projected electorate 4072. Variance 8%. 1 Member. Severn ward as it stands is dramatically undersized; with an electorate of 3,046, projected to remain substantially unchanged, it would be some 20% under quota. Because its border cannot be moved to the north east (Severn river, boundary with Wales), or the north west (boundary with Gloucestershire), the only legal options are to expand into the town of Thornbury, or to continue down the coast, taking in additional towns and villages similar to those already within the ward. As Thornbury is a distinct unit and community, and substantially larger than any other settlement in the area (see below), it would make no sense to merge these two together. This would result in disparate communities lacking commonality of interests, and the small communities of the Severn estuary would find their voices entirely drowned out by the larger town. Instead, the ward should be expanded towards the villages of Pilning and Severn Beach, down the A403 corridor. This road runs from Aust, in the existing Severn ward, to both of the two villages of Pilning and Severn Beach. This would create a single member ward, comprised mainly of current Polling Districts SEA, SEB, SEC, SEE, PSA and PSB, which ran in a broadly rectangular manner down the entire Severn coast of the district. The villages involved are all small, coastal or just inland, and have similar characteristics and concerns. This would aid in both community cohesion and efficient local government, as issues related to the mud flats, or coastal flooding would be entirely contained within a single ward, with one member. It is important that this rural area, of Vale communities is kept together as a ward, and not submerged into urban Thornbury, which has a different focus and different needs. The vale communities clustered along the Severn are very distinctive, and have a long tradition of electing very local candidates to reflect their distinctiveness. This should not be lost. We propose the removal of two sections. Polling district SED, which is entirely inland, would be moved to Ladden Brook ward to reflect their communities’ links to the non-coastal interior of the district, and a small portion of polling district PSA would be moved to Almondsbury ward. The affected properties are all on the other side of the railway line from Pilning, and largely on a road leading away from Pilning, towards the interior. Aust, Hill, Oldbury on Severn and Rockhampton Parishes are totally enclosed in the new proposed ward, as is the overwhelming majority of Pilning and Severn Beach, with the exception of 148 electors, who are separated from the rest of the community by the railway line.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ms Kate Coggins Sent Via Email To: Request-713266
    Chief Executive & Corporate Resources Ms Kate Coggins Date: 8th January 2021 Your Ref: Our Ref: FIDP/015776-20 Sent via email to: Enquiries to: Customer Relations request-713266- Tel: (01454) 868009 [email protected] Email: [email protected] Dear Ms Coggins, RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST Thank you for your request for information received on 16th December 2020. Further to our acknowledgement of 18th December 2020, I am writing to provide the Council’s response to your enquiry. This is provided at the end of this letter. I trust that your questions have been satisfactorily answered. If you have any questions about this response, then please contact me again via [email protected] or at the address below. If you are not happy with this response you have the right to request an internal review by emailing [email protected]. Please quote the reference number above when contacting the Council again. If you remain dissatisfied with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF or via their website at www.ico.org.uk Yours sincerely, Chris Gillett Private Sector Housing Manager cc CECR – Freedom of Information South Gloucestershire Council, Chief Executive & Corporate Resources Department Customer Relations, PO Box 1953, Bristol, BS37 0DB www.southglos.gov.uk FOI request reference: FIDP/015776-20 Request Title: List of Licensed HMOs in Bristol area Date received: 16th December 2020 Service areas: Housing Date responded: 8th January 2021 FOI Request Questions I would be grateful if you would supply a list of addresses for current HMO licensed properties in the Bristol area including the name(s) and correspondence address(es) for the owners.
    [Show full text]
  • And Times of Sir Bernard Lovell Bernard Lovell Academy
    The Week in East Bristol & North East Somerset FREE Issue no 445 20th October 2016 Read by over 30,000 people every week In this week’s issue ...... Use or lose new bus service . page 6 Transport forum warning over new 19a route Sir Bernard Lovell honoured . pages 12 & 13 Special day in Oldland for radio astronomer Safety concerns over Keynsham crossing . page 15 Bath Hill courtesy crossing is confusing, say residents 2 The Week in • Thursday 20th October 2016 Hanham 'Clowns' terrify youngsters at youth club The current craze of people dressing and behaving in an anti- social and threatening way has come to the Hanham and Keynsham area. Last Wednesday night police were called to Hanham Youth Club after two 'clowns' frightened the young people enjoying themselves there. Sandy Hore-Ruthven, chief executive of Creative Youth Network, which runs the club, said it had been Year 7 night at the club and there were lots of young people inside at the time. “Two people, we don't know who, turned up with the intention of valuable police resources are also being used, potentially frightening the young people which they duly did. We called the impacting on our capacity to respond to other more serious police.” incidents.” It is understood the clowns did not enter the club itself but Anyone with information can report it to via frightened the youngsters by appearing at the windows. www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/contact-us/tell-us-something Mr Hore-Ruthven added: “We take this seriously. The people behind this may think it is fun but it is not funny for a lot of young people.” The so-called 'killer clown' craze began in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Curo Housing Estate a Scene of “Deprivation” Keynsham Town Councillor Dave Biddleston Says Pre-War Poverty”
    THE WEEK IN East Bristol & North East Somerset FREE Issue 544 26th September 2018 Read by over 40,000 people each week Curo housing estate a scene of “deprivation” Keynsham town councillor Dave Biddleston says pre-war poverty”. vandalism and ant-social behaviour. residents are living in “deprivation” at Curo homes in Last week, a deputation from the 40-plus homes A Facebook page set up by residents shows images of Tintagel Close, claiming “basic sanitary living has been attended the town council meeting to describe some of bare electrical wiring exposed to the elements and other so compromised it's as if Keynsham has moved back to the problems they face as a result of poor maintenance, scenes of neglect. Recently The Week In reported on an arson attack when waste bins were deliberately set alight and although nobody was hurt, considerable damage was caused to neighbouring properties, with the heat even melting drainpipes and guttering. At the time residents reported that the lock on the bin store door had been vandalised and not repaired. Responding to a report by BBC Bristol, Curo claimed that the CCTV system at Tintagel Close had been vandalised beyond repair. This brought an angry reaction from residents who claimed the security cameras have never worked. Continued on page 3 Tintagel Close Concerns at Warmley Funding boost for Problems persist at MP changes position Also in this Community Centre . Keynsham one-way Mangotsfield tip on Brexit week’s issue . page 5 . page 6 . page 12 . page 7 2 The Week in • Wednesday 26th September 2018 Curo housing estate a Public meeting to scene of “deprivation” discuss traffic concerns Continued from page 1 homes at Tintagel Close.
    [Show full text]
  • NOTICE of ELECTION Election of Parish Councillors
    NOTICE OF ELECTION South Gloucestershire Council Election of Parish Councillors for the Parishes listed below Number of Parish Councillors to Number of Parish Councillors to Parishes Parishes be elected be elected Acton Turville Five Marshfield Nine Almondsbury, Almondsbury Four Oldbury-on-Severn Seven Almondsbury, Compton Two Oldland, Cadbury Heath Seven Almondsbury, Cribbs Causeway Seven Oldland, Longwell Green Seven Alveston Eleven Oldland, Mount Hill One Aust Seven Olveston Nine Badminton Seven Patchway, Callicroft Nine Bitton, North Common Six Patchway, Coniston Six Bitton, Oldland Common Four Pilning & Severn Beach, Pilning Four Bitton, South Four Pilning & Severn Beach, Severn Six Beach Bradley Stoke, North Six Pucklechurch Nine Bradley Stoke, South Seven Rangeworthy Five Bradley Stoke, Stoke Brook Two Rockhampton Five Charfield Nine Siston, Common Three Cold Ashton Five Siston, Rural One Cromhall Seven Siston, Warmley Five Dodington, North East Four Sodbury, North East Five Dodington, North West Eight Sodbury, Old Sodbury Five Dodington, South Three Sodbury, South West Five Downend & Bromley Heath, Downend Ten Stoke Gifford, Central Nine Downend & Bromley Heath, Staple Hill Two Stoke Gifford, University Three Doynton Five Stoke Lodge and the Common Nine Dyrham & Hinton Five Thornbury, Central Three Emersons Green, Badminton Three Thornbury, East Three Emersons Green, Blackhorse Three Thornbury, North East Four Emersons Green, Emersons Green Seven Thornbury, North West Three Emersons Green, Pomphrey Three Thornbury, South Three
    [Show full text]
  • Accounts of the Constables of Bristol Castle
    BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS General Editor: PROFESSOR PATRICK MCGRATH, M.A., Assistant General Editor: MISS ELIZABETH RALPH, M .A., F.S.A. VOL. XXXIV ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN 1HE THIRTEENTH AND EARLY FOURTEENTH CENTURIES ACCOUNTS OF THE CONSTABLES OF BRISTOL CASTLE IN THE THIR1EENTH AND EARLY FOUR1EENTH CENTURIES EDITED BY MARGARET SHARP Printed for the BRISTOL RECORD SOCIETY 1982 ISSN 0305-8730 © Margaret Sharp Produced for the Society by A1an Sutton Publishing Limited, Gloucester Printed in Great Britain by Redwood Burn Limited Trowbridge CONTENTS Page Abbreviations VI Preface XI Introduction Xlll Pandulf- 1221-24 1 Ralph de Wiliton - 1224-25 5 Burgesses of Bristol - 1224-25 8 Peter de la Mare - 1282-84 10 Peter de la Mare - 1289-91 22 Nicholas Fermbaud - 1294-96 28 Nicholas Fermbaud- 1300-1303 47 Appendix 1 - Lists of Lords of Castle 69 Appendix 2 - Lists of Constables 77 Appendix 3 - Dating 94 Bibliography 97 Index 111 ABBREVIATIONS Abbrev. Plac. Placitorum in domo Capitulari Westmon­ asteriensi asservatorum abbrevatio ... Ed. W. Dlingworth. Rec. Comm. London, 1811. Ann. Mon. Annales monastici Ed. H.R. Luard. 5v. (R S xxxvi) London, 1864-69. BBC British Borough Charters, 1216-1307. Ed. A. Ballard and J. Tait. 3v. Cambridge 1913-43. BOAS Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society Transactions (Author's name and the volume number quoted. Full details in bibliography). BIHR Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research. BM British Museum - Now British Library. Book of Fees Liber Feodorum: the Book of Fees com­ monly called Testa de Nevill 3v. HMSO 1920-31. Book of Seals Sir Christopher Hatton's Book of Seals Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Crackdown on 'Cuckooing' Drug Dealers in Staple Hill
    THE WEEK IN East Bristol & North East Somerset FREE Issue 570 3rd April 2019 Read by over 40,000 people each week Crackdown on ‘cuckooing’ drug dealers in Staple Hill A court has granted a partial closure order for a premises as a base to supply drugs from – known as past six months. Officers executed a warrant at the property in Staple Hill to help protect a vulnerable cuckooing. property in January and found large amounts of class A man from ‘cuckooing’. Residents have made multiple reports of offences drugs and weapons, including machetes. The man, who lives in a property in the Phoenix Grove including drug-dealing and misuse, anti-social behaviour Paul Crouch, Anti-Social Behaviour Officer at Avon & area, was at risk from dealers who wanted to exploit his and cuckooing to Sovereign Housing Association over the Somerset Police, said: “We’ve been working with the housing association and South Gloucestershire Council to safeguard the victim and prevent further offences from taking place. “We took the unusual step of applying for a partial closure order, which was granted at Bristol Magistrates’ Court, which allows the victim to stay at the property but means no one else is permitted to be inside the premises, apart from council and housing association staff and emergency services personnel. “Drug dealers use cuckooing as a method of exploiting vulnerable people. They effectively take over their home and use it as a base to supply class A drugs from. “It’s a destructive practice which has a corrosive influence on our local communities and we’ll do everything we can to prevent it from happening.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan 2018-2036
    SUPPORTING DOCUMENT FEBRUARY 2018 South Gloucestershire LOCAL PLAN 2018-2036 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) 2017 Explanatory Note February 2018 www.southglos.gov.ukPAGE 3 Planning for our future South Gloucestershire Gypsy & Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) 2017 – Explanatory Note Introduction The Council, in its capacity as the local planning authority (LPA) is required by national policy to make their own assessment of ‘travellers’ accommodation needs for the purposes of planning. In August 2015, the Government published revised planning guidance in ‘Planning Policy for Traveller Sites’ (PPTS). The most significant amendment was a change to the definition of Gypsy and Travellers and Travelling Showpeople (‘travellers’). The new definition effectively regards those who have ceased to travel on a permanent basis as falling outside of the definition of what it means, for the purposes of planning, to be a Gypsy/Traveller or Travelling Showperson. The revised definition (from Annex 1) is as follows: “Persons of nomadic habit of life whatever their race or origin, including such persons who on grounds only of their own or their family’s or dependants’ educational or health needs or old age have ceased to travel temporarily, but excluding members of an organised group of travelling showpeople or circus people travelling together as such. In determining whether persons are “gypsies and travellers” for the purposes of this planning policy, consideration should be given to the following issues amongst other relevant matters: a. whether they previously led a nomadic habit of life b. the reasons for ceasing their nomadic habit of life c. whether there is an intention of living a nomadic habit of life in the future, and if so, how soon and in what circumstances.” This change to national policy has resulted in the Council needing to update its Gypsy and Traveller evidence base (the GTAA) in progressing its Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • West of England Joint Spatial Plan Publication Document November 2017
    West of England Joint Spatial Plan Publication Document November 2017 Contents Foreword 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 6 Chapter 2: Vision, Critical Issues and Strategic Priorites 8 Chapter 3: Formulating the Spatial Strategy 14 Chapter 4: Policy Framework 18 Chapter 5: Delivery and Implementation 47 www.jointplanningwofe.org.uk 3 MANCHESTER BIRMINGHAM CARDIFF WEST OF ENGLAND LONDON SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE BRISTOL NORTH SOMERSET BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET 4 We have to address key economic and social Foreword imbalances within our city region and support The West of England (WoE) currently faces a key inclusive growth. In the WoE, we need to take steps challenge; how to accommodate and deliver to ensure more homes are built of the right type and much needed new homes, jobs and infrastructure mix, and in locations that people and businesses alongside protecting and enhancing our unique need. Businesses should be able to locate where and high quality built and natural environment. It is they can be most efficient and create jobs, enabling this combination that will create viable, healthy and people to live, rent and own homes in places which attractive places. This is key to the ongoing success are accessible to where they work. Transport and of the West of England which contributes to its infrastructure provision needs to be in place up appeal and its high quality of life. front or to keep pace with development to support sustainable growth. Many people feel passionately about where they live and the impact new growth might have on their local The challenges involved and the scale of the issues communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling South Gloucestershire 10 Short Leisure Routes Between 3 and 12 Miles 10 Leisure Rides
    Cycling South Gloucestershire 10 short leisure routes between 3 and 12 miles 10 Leisure Rides 2 8 4 7 10 5 1 3 6 9 © Crown copyright and route (route shown in relevant colour) database rights 2011 Ordnance Survey Key 100023410 K Cafe Toilets Pub xyA Station Refer to this key for all route maps 2 Introduction These routes are aimed at all levels of cyclists and their families. Cycling offers a great opportunity to discover new places and views in South Gloucestershire.We hope that you enjoy cycling these routes and that it encourages you to get your bike out more often. The routes vary in length and difficulty. A grading system has been used to determine the ability level required to cycle these routes. However this is only a guide. Ability Levels 1 For all users including inexperienced or beginner cyclists. Any hills will be very gentle and any on road cycling will be on quiet roads. 2 For slightly more experienced cyclists or those who may feel a bit more confident. There may be the occasional steep hill (don’t be afraid to get off and push!) and occasional short stretches on busier roads. 3 For the reasonably competent cyclists. The rides will be longer, with some steep hills and with cycling on or alongside busy roads for longer stretches. The distances given do not take into account any return journey unless the route is circular. The times given to cycle a route may vary depending on fitness level and the number of breaks and stops. Advice These routes incorporate off road sections that are shared with pedestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Avon Bird Report 2006
    AVON BIRD REPORT 2006 AVON ORNITHOLOGICAL GROUP Front cover : Garganey (male) taken at Chew Valley Lake in May Photograph by Gary Thorburn Rear cover: Map of the Avon area computer generated by S. Godden, Dept. of Geography, University of Bristol. Text drawings by: Phil Baber, Brian Slade, John Martin, Richard Andrews. Typeset in WORD 2000 and printed by Healeys, Ipswich ISSN Number – 0956-5744 CONTENTS Front Avon Ornithological Group (AOG) cover Editorial H.E. Rose 3 Notes on species for which documentations is 4 required. A review of 2006 R. Higgins 5 Diurnal migration in October R.L. Bland 9 Migrant date summary 10 Weather in 2006 R.L. Bland 11 Introduction to systematic list 14 Systematic list Swans and geese J. Williams 17 Ducks M.S. Ponsford 22 Game birds R. Mielcarek 36 Divers to Spoonbill R.J. Higgins 37 Raptors B. Lancastle 45 Water Rail to Coot R. Mielcarek 52 Waders H.E. Rose 54 Skuas to Auks R.M. Andrews 70 Doves to Woodpeckers R. Mielcarek 81 Passerines, Larks to Dipper J.P. Martin 88 Passerines, Wren to Buntings R.L. Bland 94 J. Williams & R 120 Escaped, released and hybrids Mielcarek Contributors of records 122 The diet of urban Peregrines in Bath Edward Drewitt 123 Unusual ornithological events in the Avon area, A.H. Davis 131 1981 - 2005 The affect of the 1990’s mange epidemic in Fox’s M Dadds 145 on Common Pheasant Yellow-legged Gull identification in Avon John Martin 151 A gull incident at Chew Valley Lake C. J. Stone 155 Sapsucking by Great Spotted Woodpecker R.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policies, Sites & Places Development Plan Document
    South Gloucestershire Council Draft Policies, Sites & Places Development Plan Document June 2014 Draft Policies, Sites & Places Plan Part 1 - June 2014 Contents Page(s) 1. Introduction 1-3 2. Part One 4-5 Development Management Policies 6-85 Oldbury New Nuclear Build 86-96 Consultation Questions 97 3. Part Two 98-101 Sites and Places 102-293 4. Site Allocations 294-297 5. Glossary 298-306 Appendices: 1. Review of Saved Local Plan Policies and Policies Map Changes 1A. Review of Saved Local Plan Policies Policies Map Changes: 1B. Review of Policy Designations 1C. Review of Policy Allocations 1D. Proposed New Allocations and Designations 2. List of Proposed Local Green Spaces 3. Supporting Document on Minerals Site Options 1. Introduction The South Gloucestershire Local Plan 1.1 The Policies, Sites and Places Plan (PSP Plan) is the final document being prepared by the Council in completing its Local Plan. The Local Plan is a set of documents (currently comprising the Joint Waste Core Strategy and Core Strategy) which will update and replace the previous South Gloucestershire Local Plan (adopted 2006) and Minerals & Waste Local Plan (adopted 2002) and will guide future planning decisions in the district. 1.2 The Local Plan ‘lead’ document is the Core Strategy. This sets out the overall development strategy for South Gloucestershire and contains the strategic planning policies to deliver that strategy. As the strategic component of the Local Plan, the Core Strategy sets out 9 strategic objectives. These establish the basis for the policies contained in the Plan and how the Council expresses and responds to the challenge of delivering sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Archaeological Research Group 4
    ISSN 0144 6576 □ ISSUE No. 2 1981 BRISTOLARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH GROUP 4 ...... GI oucestershire SITE LOCATION PLAN \ ·"' ......·-, . 0 mil.. 5 I I,, ,1 ' '· ,, I I 0 kilamelres 8 I. \. .-. ,,,, ' I 'I •. I .... Avon ·-----\ ' -Jf WESTBURY - _ \ .-. I' MARSHFIELD ' ,I , * I , -Jf REDCLIFFE WRAXALL ;* I ; * I BEDMINSTER 'I I... - - - _, 'I I ·' *KELSTON ! ' I • ....\ ,/~-;- ' ,. - . ' Wilts. I. - . ' _.,,. .... -·•• ,., ....... -· - ·' .,,... I·"' \ ,·-·- ,,,, I ' Somerset I ,, -· ,I ·- · ......--· BARGCOMMITTEE 1981-82 Chairman D Dawson Vice-chairman ••...........••... R Knight Secretary •••......••.. T Coulson Membership Secretary •.... Mrs J Harrison Treasurer •••.........• J Russell Special Publications Editor .. L Grinsell Review Editor .••....••••. R Iles Secretary for Associates •.••. S Reynolds Fieldwork Advisor ••.. M Ponsford Parish Survey Organiser .. Mrs M Campbell Publicity Officer .• Mrs P Belsey Miss E Sabin, M Dunn, R Williams, J Seysell, A Parker, M Aston, Mrs M Ashley BARGMEMBERSHIP Ordinary members ...•.•.••.•• £4.00 Joint (husband and wife) ••.• £6.00 Senior Citizen or student ••• £2,80 Associate (under 18) ••••.••• £1.00 The official address of Bristol Archaeological Research Group is: BARG, Bristol City Museum, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RL. Further copies of this Review can be obtained from the Secretary at the above address. Editorial communications should be addresed to: R Iles, 46 Shadwell Road, Bristol BS? SEP. BARGReview 2 typed by June Iles. BARGis grateful to Bristol Threatened History Society for financial
    [Show full text]