La Piqûre De Diptère…………………...…..89
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate Survey 2020
Millichope Park and Estate Invertebrate survey 2020 (Coleoptera, Diptera and Aculeate Hymenoptera) Nigel Jones & Dr. Caroline Uff Shropshire Entomology Services CONTENTS Summary 3 Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 3 Methodology …………………………………………………….. 4 Results ………………………………………………………………. 5 Coleoptera – Beeetles 5 Method ……………………………………………………………. 6 Results ……………………………………………………………. 6 Analysis of saproxylic Coleoptera ……………………. 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………. 8 Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera – true flies, bees, wasps ants 8 Diptera 8 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results ……………………………………………………………. 9 Aculeate Hymenoptera 9 Method …………………………………………………………… 9 Results …………………………………………………………….. 9 Analysis of Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera … 10 Conclusion Diptera and aculeate Hymenoptera .. 11 Other species ……………………………………………………. 12 Wetland fauna ………………………………………………….. 12 Table 2 Key Coleoptera species ………………………… 13 Table 3 Key Diptera species ……………………………… 18 Table 4 Key aculeate Hymenoptera species ……… 21 Bibliography and references 22 Appendix 1 Conservation designations …………….. 24 Appendix 2 ………………………………………………………… 25 2 SUMMARY During 2020, 811 invertebrate species (mainly beetles, true-flies, bees, wasps and ants) were recorded from Millichope Park and a small area of adjoining arable estate. The park’s saproxylic beetle fauna, associated with dead wood and veteran trees, can be considered as nationally important. True flies associated with decaying wood add further significant species to the site’s saproxylic fauna. There is also a strong -
Diversity and Resource Choice of Flower-Visiting Insects in Relation to Pollen Nutritional Quality and Land Use
Diversity and resource choice of flower-visiting insects in relation to pollen nutritional quality and land use Diversität und Ressourcennutzung Blüten besuchender Insekten in Abhängigkeit von Pollenqualität und Landnutzung Vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doctor rerum naturalium genehmigte Dissertation von Dipl. Biologin Christiane Natalie Weiner aus Köln Berichterstatter (1. Referent): Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Mitberichterstatter (2. Referent): Prof. Dr. Andreas Jürgens Tag der Einreichung: 26.02.2016 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 29.04.2016 Darmstadt 2016 D17 2 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre hiermit ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit entsprechend den Regeln guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis selbständig und ohne unzulässige Hilfe Dritter angefertigt habe. Sämtliche aus fremden Quellen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Gedanken sowie sämtliche von Anderen direkt oder indirekt übernommene Daten, Techniken und Materialien sind als solche kenntlich gemacht. Die Arbeit wurde bisher keiner anderen Hochschule zu Prüfungszwecken eingereicht. Osterholz-Scharmbeck, den 24.02.2016 3 4 My doctoral thesis is based on the following manuscripts: Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2011): Land-use intensity in grasslands: changes in biodiversity, species composition and specialization in flower-visitor networks. Basic and Applied Ecology 12 (4), 292-299. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. (2014): Land-use impacts on plant-pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines. Ecology 95, 466–474. Weiner, C.N., Werner, M , Blüthgen, N. (in prep.): Land-use intensification triggers diversity loss in pollination networks: Regional distinctions between three different German bioregions Weiner, C.N., Hilpert, A., Werner, M., Linsenmair, K.-E., Blüthgen, N. -
Flesh Flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) Colonising Large Carcasses in Central Europe
Parasitol Res (2015) 114:2341–2348 DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4431-1 ORIGINAL PAPER Flesh flies (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) colonising large carcasses in Central Europe Krzysztof Szpila1 & Anna Mądra2 & Mateusz Jarmusz3 & Szymon Matuszewski2 Received: 22 January 2015 /Accepted: 10 March 2015 /Published online: 1 April 2015 # The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Sarcophagidae are an important element of carrion caerulescens, S. similis and S. carnaria species group. insect community. Unfortunately, results on larval and adult Gravid females and larvae were collected only in the case Sarcophagidae from forensic carrion studies are virtually ab- of S. argyrostoma, S. caerulescens, S. melanura and sent mostly due to the taxonomic problems with species S. similis. Sarcophaga caerulescens and S. similis bred reg- identification of females and larvae. The impact of this taxon ularly in carcasses, while S. argyrostoma was recorded only on decomposition of large carrion has not been reliably eval- occasionally. First instar larvae of flesh flies were recorded uated. During several pig carcass studies in Poland, large on carrion earlier or concurrently with first instar larvae of body of data on adult and larval Sarcophagidae was collect- blowflies. Third instar larvae of S. caerulescens were usually ed. We determined (1) assemblages of adult flesh flies vis- observed before the appearance of the third instar blowfly iting pig carrion in various habitats, (2) species of flesh flies larvae. These results contest the view that flesh flies colonise which breed in pig carcasses, and (3) temporal distribution carcasses later than blowflies. Sarcophaga caerulescens is of flesh fly larvae during decomposition. -
Tilbury Power Station Essex, Invertebrate Survey Report (June 2008)
TILBURY POWER STATION ESSEX, INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT (JUNE 2008). REPORT BY COLIN PLANT ASSOCIATES (UK) DOCUMENT REF: APPENDIX 10.J Commissioned by Bioscan (UK) Ltd The Old Parlour Little Baldon Farm Little Baldon OX44 9PU TILBURY POWER STATION, ESSEX INVERTEBRATE SURVEY FINAL REPORT (incorporating analysis of aquatic assemblage) JUNE 2008 Report number BS/2235/07rev2 Colin Plant Associates (UK) Consultant Entomologists 14 West Road Bishops Stortford Hertfordshire CM23 3QP 01279-507697 [email protected] 1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE OF THE SURVEY 1.1 Introduction 1.1.1 Colin Plant Associates (UK) were commissioned by Bioscan (UK) Ltd on behalf of RWE npower to undertake an assessment of invertebrate species at Tilbury Power Station between May and October 2007 inclusive. This document is the final report of that survey. 1.2 Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey methodology 1.2.1 The minimum survey effort recommended by Brooks (Brooks, 1993. ‘Guidelines for invertebrate site surveys’. British Wildlife 4: 283-286) was taken as a basic requirement for the present survey. Daytime sampling of terrestrial invertebrate species was undertaken in all areas by direct observation, by sweep netting and by using a beating tray. In addition, a suction sampler was deployed and a number of pitfall and pan traps were set. 1.2.2 Sweep-netting. A stout hand-held net is moved vigorously through vegetation to dislodge resting insects. The technique may be used semi-quantitatively by timing the number of sweeps through vegetation of a similar type and counting selected groups of species. This technique is effective for many invertebrates, including several beetle families, most plant bug groups and a large number of other insects that live in vegetation of this type. -
Promoting Pollinators Along the Area 9 Road Network
Inspiring change for Important Invertebrate Areas in the UK 11th September 2014 Susan Thompson - Grants & Trusts Officer Saving the small things that run the planet Steven Falk March 2017 1 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction and background .................................................................................................... 4 Site selection ............................................................................................................................. 4 Methods .................................................................................................................................. 10 Results ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Total number of pollinators recorded ............................................................................ 16 Most frequent pollinators .............................................................................................. 17 Most abundant pollinators ............................................................................................. 18 Total flowers recorded ................................................................................................... 18 Most frequent flowers ................................................................................................... -
Invertebrate Survey Report
Appendix 10.1h Extension Area – Invertebrate Survey Report LINHAY HILL QUARRY: EXTENSION AREA INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT On behalf of E & JW Glendinning Ltd. MARCH 2016 LINHAY HILL QUARRY: EXTENSION AREA INVERTEBRATE SURVEY REPORT E&JW GLENDINNING LTD. MARCH 2016 CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 2 1.1 OVERVIEW & SURVEY OBJECTIVES ...................................................................... 2 1.2 CONSERVATION STATUS & PROTECTION ............................................................ 2 1.2.1 Conservation Status ...................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Legal Protection ............................................................................................ 3 1.2.3 Planning Policy .............................................................................................. 3 1.3 PRE‐EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION & RECORDS ............................................. 4 2.0 METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................... 6 2.1 HABITAT ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................... 6 2.2 INVERTEBRATE SAMPLING.................................................................................. 6 2.3 BASELINE EVALUATION CRITERIA ....................................................................... 6 2.4 SURVEY DATES, WEATHER CONDITIONS & PERSONNEL ...................................... 7 2.5 -
Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with New
Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with new records from Croatia and other Mediterranean countries Krcmar, Stjepan; Whitmore, Daniel; Pape, Thomas; Buenaventura, Eliana Published in: ZooKeys DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.831.30795 Publication date: 2019 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Krcmar, S., Whitmore, D., Pape, T., & Buenaventura, E. (2019). Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with new records from Croatia and other Mediterranean countries. ZooKeys, 831, 95-155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.831.30795 Download date: 27. sep.. 2021 A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 831: 95–155Checklist (2019) of the Sarcophagidae of Croatia, with new records from Croatia... 95 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.831.30795 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with new records from Croatia and other Mediterranean countries Stjepan Krčmar1, Daniel Whitmore2, Thomas Pape3, Eliana Buenaventura4 1 Department of Biology, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Cara Hadrijana 8/A, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia 2 Department of Entomology, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Rosenstein 1, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany 3 Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK- 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark 4 Museum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Invalidenstraße 43, 10115 Berlin, Germany Corresponding author: Stjepan Krčmar ([email protected]); Daniel Whitmore ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Cerretti | Received 24 October 2018 | Accepted 7 February 2019 | Published 18 March 2019 http://zoobank.org/FD464654-5DAA-402B-9267-41253F856477 Citation: Krčmar S, Whitmore D, Pape T, Buenaventura E (2019) Checklist of the Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of Croatia, with new records from Croatia and other Mediterranean countries. -
EDF Energy Sizewell C New Nuclear Power Station
EDF Energy Sizewell C New Nuclear Power Station: Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecology, and Ornithology Invertebrate Survey Report 2007-2010 Draft Report June 2012 AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Disclaimer This report has been prepared in a working draft form and has not been finalised or formally reviewed. As such it should be taken as an indication only of the material and conclusions that will form the final report. Any calculations or findings presented here may be changed or altered and should not be taken to reflect AMEC’s opinions or conclusions. Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment and Infrastructure UK Limited 2012) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. -
Land at Manydown, Basingstoke
Land at Manydown, shaping a place, creating a community Basingstoke MSD12t: Invertebrates ES Appendix 9.9 February 2017 shaping a place, creating a community MANYDOWN ECOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT Terrestrial Invertebrates 5161.01.026 Document Title Manydown Ecological Technical Report – Terrestrial Invertebrates Prepared for Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council / Hampshire County Council Prepared by TEP Ltd Document Ref 5161.01.026 Author Mark Tunmore Date December 2016 Checked Rachel Roberts Approved Rachel Roberts Amendment History Check / Modified Version Date Approved Reason(s) issue Status by by 1.0 Dec 2016 MT RAR First draft for Client review Draft 2.0 Jan 2017 GAR RAR Amendments following review Draft Amendments following boundary change & 3.0 Feb 2017 GAR RAR Final review Manydown Ecological Technical Report Terrestrial Invertebrates Contents Page Preface ....................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 2 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................... 4 3.0 Method ........................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results .......................................................................................................... -
This Electronic Thesis Or Dissertation Has Been Downloaded from Explore Bristol Research
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Forup, Mikael Lytzau Title: The restoration of plant pollinator interactions General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. The restoration of plant-pollinator interactions MikaeI Lytzau Forup A thesis submitted to the University of Bristol in accordancewith the requirementsof the degreeof Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Science School of Biological Sciences 32,045words January2003 ABSTRACT 1. -
Arthropods of Forensic Interest Associated to Pig Carcasses in Aiako Harria Natural Park (Basque Country, Northern Spain)
Ciencia Forense, 12/2015: 207–228 ISSN: 1575-6793 ARTHROPODS OF FORENSIC INTEREST ASSOCIATED TO PIG CARCASSES IN AIAKO HARRIA NATURAL PARK (BASQUE COUNTRY, NORTHERN SPAIN) Beatriz Díaz-Martín1 Marta I. Saloña-Bordas2 Abstract: A checklist of carrion-related arthropods collected in associa- tion to pig carcasses in Aiako Harria Natural Park (Basque Country, nor- thern Spain) is presented. Leaving aside the subphylum Myriapoda, there are 16 orders represented in 7837 specimens, being the most important those of the class Insecta (7667 specimens; 98%). The moment in which they were present during the decomposition of a piglet carcass is detailed, and an analysis of the diversity of each decomposition stage was performed. Fresh stage is the moment when a higher degree of dominance and less diversity were found, being the dry stage the most diverse one. It should be stressed out the huge amount of new records: 2 new species for Science [Crossopalpus sp. n. (nr. nigritellus and aeneus) and Drapetis sp. n. (group exilis) (Diptera: Hybotidae)]; 1 genus (Alloborborus) and 8 species new for the Iberian Peninsula (Crossopalpus humilis, Meroplius fukuharai, Nemopoda speiseri, Sepsis luteipes, Alloborborus pallifrons, Phthitia empirica, Spelobia cambri- ca, Trachyopella kuntzei); 7 new species for Spain (Siphunculina aenaea, Siphunculina quinquangula, Megaselia citrinella, Megaselia meconicera, Megaselia tama, Pseudacteon formicarium, Ischiolepta denticulata); 1 new species for the peninsular Spain (Telomerina levifrons); 2 family, 12 genus and 29 species new for the Basque Country; and 1 family, 4 genus and 3 species new for Guipúzcoa. This study may serve as a reference for future forensic studies in the Basque Country and other similar biogeoclimatic areas. -
A Survey of Wytham Woods Pollinators
THE POLLINATORS OF WYTHAM WOODS 2017-2020 SURVEY Version 1 (February 2021) Steven Falk A report for Wytham Woods, University of Oxford The Pollinators of Wytham Woods 2017-2020 Steven Falk Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Site description .................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Objectives ............................................................................................................. 7 2. METHODOLOGY ....................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Dates of visits ..................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Active surveying ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Pan-trapping ...................................................................................................... 15 2.4 Taxonomic scope of recording ........................................................................... 17 2.5 Identification of insect specimens ..................................................................... 17 2.6 Insect nomenclature .......................................................................................... 19 2.7 Ascertaining insect conservation