DOCSLIB.ORG

State and Local Government Tax and Revenue Rankings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State and Local Government Tax and Revenue Rankings 2014-15 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS Wisconsin Department of Revenue Division of Research and Policy October 2017 STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAX AND REVENUE RANKINGS This report provides Wisconsin's state and local government revenue rankings relative to other states. The report presents Wisconsin's ranking for both individual revenue sources (such as the general sales tax) and for combined revenue sources (such as all taxes and all general revenues). Rankings established in this report are based on state and local government revenue data from the 2014- 15 Annual Survey of Government Finances published by the U.S. Census Bureau.1 The figures used in this report measure revenue for state and local governments combined. This report uses population estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau mid-year population figures for 2014 released in December, 2016 and personal income data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis for 2014 released September 26, 2017. State and local government tax revenues are usually defined, measured, and ranked in one of two ways. One approach measures revenues per $1,000 of personal income (state and local revenue divided by state personal income). The other approach uses per capita calculations (state and local revenue divided by state population). The table below presents Wisconsin's ranking using both measures. The Department of Revenue website includes an interactive database and map of state tax rankings here. The appendices to this report include the tax burden and rankings of each state for the revenue categories contained in the table below. Wisconsin State and Local Government Revenues 2014-2015 State and Local Per $1,000 Per Person Wisconsin Wisconsin Rank Wisconsin Wisconsin Rank % U.S. % U.S. Revenue 231.7 100.4% 25 10,262 95.6% 24 General Revenue 189.2 96.0% 28 8,380 91.4% 30 Intergovernmental Revenue 38.3 86.4% 39 1,699 82.3% 40 General Revenue from Own Sources 150.8 98.7% 25 6,681 94.1% 25 Taxes 105.5 99.7% 21 4,672 95.0% 21 Property 36.6 110.9% 15 1,619 105.7% 14 Sales and Gross Receipts 32.0 86.9% 38 1,415 82.8% 35 General Sales 20.7 83.3% 35 917 79.4% 33 Selective Sales 11.2 94.2% 28 498 89.8% 29 Motor Fuel 4.0 134.4% 12 176 128.1% 10 Alcoholic Beverage 0.2 47.5% 38 10 45.3% 39 Tobacco Products 2.5 205.0% 5 111 195.3% 6 Public Utilities 1.6 81.8% 23 69 77.9% 24 Other Selective Sales 3.0 55.3% 45 131 52.7% 44 Individual Income 27.7 111.6% 18 1,228 106.3% 14 Corporate Income 4.0 104.8% 17 179 99.8% 17 Motor Vehicle License 1.9 103.7% 22 82 98.8% 23 Other Taxes 3.4 60.0% 41 149 57.2% 41 Charges and miscellaneous General Revenue 45.4 96.6% 28 2,009 92.0% 30 1. State and Local Government Finances by Level of Government and by State: 2014-15, U.S. Census. http://www.census.gov/govs/local/ 2 APPENDIX 1 State and Local Taxes (Census) per $1,000 of personal income (BEA) Rank Revenue $ Rank General Revenue $ Rank Intergovernmental Revenue $ 1 Wyoming 318.0 1 New Mexico 281.3 1 New Mexico 93.9 2 New Mexico 315.5 2 Wyoming 274.1 2 Mississippi 79.9 3 New York 305.0 3 New York 258.0 3 Vermont 73.5 4 Oregon 294.2 4 North Dakota 257.7 4 Alaska 72.9 5 North Dakota 287.5 5 Alaska 256.9 5 West Virginia 72.2 6 Mississippi 286.1 6 Mississippi 251.4 6 Oregon 71.6 7 Alaska 285.0 7 West Virginia 248.4 7 Kentucky 67.7 8 West Virginia 271.7 8 Oregon 243.0 8 Wyoming 65.5 9 California 257.2 9 Vermont 236.9 9 Arkansas 64.4 10 South Carolina 255.9 10 Hawaii 229.1 10 Montana 64.3 11 Vermont 255.3 11 Iowa 221.8 11 Louisiana 55.1 12 Hawaii 254.3 12 South Carolina 218.8 12 Michigan 54.4 13 Nebraska 253.6 13 Delaware 217.3 13 Alabama 53.5 14 Iowa 253.1 14 Kentucky 215.3 14 Maine 52.7 15 Ohio 252.9 15 California 211.0 15 New York 52.6 16 Utah 247.5 16 Minnesota 210.8 16 Arizona 52.2 17 Minnesota 246.6 17 Maine 210.7 17 Ohio 52.1 18 Kentucky 246.2 18 Arkansas 209.7 18 Iowa 51.0 19 Delaware 244.4 19 Rhode Island 208.9 19 Rhode Island 50.8 20 Montana 240.8 20 Montana 208.8 20 California 47.0 21 Arkansas 238.3 21 Michigan 207.3 21 Delaware 46.7 22 Michigan 235.9 22 Ohio 206.2 22 South Carolina 46.6 23 Alabama 235.3 23 Alabama 205.5 23 North Carolina 46.3 24 Rhode Island 232.7 24 Utah 202.3 24 Hawaii 46.0 25 Wisconsin 231.7 25 North Carolina 198.2 25 Missouri 45.1 26 Washington 229.5 26 Indiana 194.0 26 Indiana 44.9 27 Maine 227.4 27 Louisiana 193.9 27 Idaho 44.6 28 North Carolina 225.8 28 Wisconsin 189.2 28 Minnesota 44.3 29 Louisiana 221.9 29 Nebraska 188.6 29 North Dakota 43.7 30 Nevada 220.5 30 Illinois 186.3 30 Tennessee 42.8 31 Colorado 220.1 31 Colorado 186.2 31 Oklahoma 42.6 32 Arizona 219.3 32 Pennsylvania 186.0 32 South Dakota 42.5 33 Illinois 217.6 33 Washington 185.9 33 Utah 42.1 34 Indiana 215.9 34 New Jersey 185.9 34 Pennsylvania 41.1 35 Tennessee 215.4 35 Idaho 185.3 35 Maryland 41.0 36 Pennsylvania 215.3 36 Maryland 183.9 36 Washington 40.6 37 Missouri 213.6 37 Arizona 182.2 37 Massachusetts 39.7 38 Idaho 212.5 38 Massachusetts 181.5 38 Nevada 39.3 39 Massachusetts 210.3 39 Nevada 181.3 39 Wisconsin 38.3 40 New Jersey 205.6 40 Kansas 180.8 40 Georgia 37.2 41 Kansas 205.3 41 Missouri 178.3 41 Nebraska 36.8 42 Maryland 201.3 42 Oklahoma 172.4 42 Texas 36.7 43 Georgia 199.7 43 Georgia 170.3 43 Illinois 35.8 44 Oklahoma 198.9 44 Texas 169.7 44 New Jersey 35.7 45 South Dakota 194.9 45 Florida 168.1 45 Florida 34.9 46 Florida 194.4 46 Tennessee 167.6 46 Colorado 33.7 47 Texas 192.9 47 South Dakota 167.6 47 Connecticut 31.2 48 Virginia 187.5 48 Virginia 164.4 48 Kansas 30.8 49 Connecticut 180.1 49 Connecticut 164.1 49 New Hampshire 30.7 50 New Hampshire 176.2 50 New Hampshire 153.1 50 Virginia 27.1 US Total 230.8 US Total 197.2 US Total 44.4 3 APPENDIX 1 State and Local Taxes (Census) per $1,000 of personal income (BEA) General Revenue from Rank Own Sources $ Rank Taxes $ Rank Property $ 1 North Dakota 214.0 1 North Dakota 161.7 1 New Hampshire 58.4 2 Wyoming 208.6 2 New York 155.6 2 Vermont 53.9 3 New York 205.4 3 Hawaii 131.7 3 New Jersey 53.5 4 New Mexico 187.4 4 Maine 123.9 4 Maine 49.9 5 Alaska 184.0 5 Vermont 123.0 5 Rhode Island 49.0 6 Hawaii 183.1 6 Minnesota 121.6 6 New York 48.1 7 West Virginia 176.2 7 Illinois 117.4 7 Connecticut 42.8 8 South Carolina 172.2 8 New Jersey 116.0 8 Illinois 42.7 9 Mississippi 171.5 9 California 115.1 9 Wyoming 41.8 10 Oregon 171.4 10 West Virginia 114.4 10 Nebraska 39.5 11 Iowa 170.8 11 Wyoming 113.9 11 Texas 38.5 12 Delaware 170.5 12 Rhode Island 113.4 12 Massachusetts 38.3 13 Minnesota 166.5 13 New Mexico 113.0 13 Montana 37.4 14 California 164.0 14 Connecticut 111.3 14 Alaska 36.7 15 Vermont 163.4 15 Maryland 108.8 15 Wisconsin 36.6 16 Utah 160.2 16 Iowa 107.9 16 Iowa 35.6 17 Rhode Island 158.1 17 Massachusetts 107.6 17 Oregon 34.1 18 Maine 158.0 18 Mississippi 107.2 18 Michigan 33.9 19 Ohio 154.1 19 Delaware 106.8 19 Minnesota 31.3 20 Michigan 152.9 20 Oregon 105.9 20 Kansas 31.1 21 Colorado 152.6 21 Wisconsin 105.5 21 South Carolina 30.9 22 Alabama 151.9 22 Nebraska 105.1 22 Pennsylvania 30.9 23 North Carolina 151.9 23 Ohio 104.8 23 Virginia 30.5 24 Nebraska 151.8 24 Pennsylvania 103.3 24 South Dakota 30.3 25 Wisconsin 150.8 25 Nevada 102.7 25 Ohio 30.2 26 Illinois 150.5 26 Kentucky 102.5 26 Florida 29.2 27 New Jersey 150.1 27 Arkansas 102.2 27 Georgia 29.1 28 Kansas 150.1 28 Montana 100.2 28 Maryland 29.0 29 Indiana 149.1 29 Michigan 98.2 29 California 28.6 30 Kentucky 147.7 30 Utah 97.9 30 Mississippi 28.4 31 Arkansas 145.3 31 North Carolina 96.8 31 Colorado 28.2 32 Washington 145.3 32 Washington 95.2 32 Washington 28.1 33 Pennsylvania 144.9 33 Indiana 95.1 33 Arizona 27.7 34 Montana 144.5 34 Kansas 94.6 34 Utah 26.4 35 Maryland 142.9 35 Louisiana 94.5 35 Idaho 26.3 36 Nevada 142.0 36 South Carolina 93.8 36 West Virginia 24.8 37 Massachusetts 141.8 37 Colorado 93.8 37 North Carolina 24.3 38 Idaho 140.7 38 Idaho 93.5 38 Indiana 24.2 39 Louisiana 138.8 39 Arizona 92.9 39 Missouri 24.2 40 Virginia 137.3 40 Texas 91.6 40 Nevada 24.0 41 Missouri 133.3 41 Georgia 91.0 41 Hawaii 23.2 42 Florida 133.2 42 Virginia 89.6 42 Tennessee 21.7 43 Georgia 133.0 43 Missouri 88.9 43 North Dakota 21.5 44 Connecticut 133.0 44 New Hampshire 88.8 44 Kentucky 21.2 45 Texas 132.9 45 Alabama 85.5 45 New Mexico 21.0 46 Arizona 130.1 46 South Dakota 84.1 46 Louisiana 20.8 47 Oklahoma 129.8 47 Oklahoma 82.5 47 Delaware 19.2 48 South Dakota 125.1 48 Tennessee 82.1 48 Arkansas 18.5 49 Tennessee 124.8 49 Florida 81.6 49 Oklahoma 15.1 50 New Hampshire 122.4 50 Alaska 64.2 50 Alabama 14.7 US Total 152.8 US Total 105.8 US Total 33.0 4 APPENDIX 1 State and Local Taxes (Census) per $1,000 of personal income (BEA) Rank Sales and Gross Receipts $ Rank General Sales $ Rank Selective Sales $ 1 Hawaii 68.6 1 Hawaii 48.6 1 Nevada 23.7 2 Nevada 64.5 2 Washington 43.7 2 Vermont 22.6 3 Washington 58.1 3 New Mexico 42.3 3 West Virginia 22.0 4 New Mexico 53.3 4 Nevada 40.8 4 Hawaii 20.0 5 North Dakota 50.9 5 Arkansas 37.9 5 Kentucky 17.6 6 Arkansas 50.7 6 North Dakota 37.5 6 Minnesota 17.4 7 Louisiana 50.3 7 Louisiana 36.4 7 Illinois 15.8 8 Mississippi 48.7 8 Arizona 36.3 8 Alabama 15.7 9 Texas 46.3 9 South Dakota 34.1 9 Mississippi 15.3 10 Tennessee 45.6 10 Mississippi 33.4 10 Maryland 15.2 11 South Dakota 45.1 11 Tennessee 33.4 11 Pennsylvania 14.9 12 Arizona 44.4 12 Texas 33.2 12 Montana 14.7 13 Florida 42.1 13 Wyoming 31.9 13 Washington 14.4 14 West Virginia 41.8 14 Kansas 29.8 14 Florida 14.2 15 Alabama 41.3 15 Ohio 28.9 15 New Hampshire 14.0 16 Indiana 40.4 16 Florida 27.9 16 Louisiana 14.0 17 Ohio 40.2 17 Indiana 27.3 17 Rhode Island 13.6 18 Wyoming 38.7 18 Oklahoma 27.3 18 North Dakota 13.4
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arizona & New Mexico
    THE MOST DEPEN DABLE way to and from The partnership between Southeastern Freight Lines and Central Arizona Freight offers you the unique combination of the premium LTL service providers in the ARIZONA & Southwest States of Arizona and New Mexico and the Southeast and Southwest. NEW MEXICO Why Central Arizona Freight? “Simply offer the best when it comes to Quality Service” • Privately Owned • Union-Free • Full data connectivity to provide complete shipment visibility • Premiere LTL carrier in Arizona and New Mexico • 60% of shipments deliver before noon t Times Transi Sample 1 hoenix aso to P El P que 3 buquer is to Al Memph 3 gman s to Kin Dalla 4 uerque Albuq iami to 4 M Tucson rlotte to Cha 4 well to Ros Atlanta Customer Testimonial: “Harmar uses Southeastern Freight Lines through your direct service and your partnership service. We ship throughout the United States, and Puerto Rico. A lot of our business moves into the Southwest, which is serviced by your partner Central Ari - zona Freight. Before we gave this business to you guys, we were using another carrier for these moves. We were experiencing service issues. We decided to make a switch to your company and their partner. Since we made the change, the service issues have diminished greatly, if not gone away. Being able to get our customers their shipments on time and damage-free was worth the change. Thank you so much, Southeastern Freight Lines and Central Arizona Freight, for making our shipping operation seamless and non-event.” Kevin Kaminski, Director - Supply Chain & Strategic Sourcing Harmar CONTACT YOUR LOCAL SOUTHEASTERN www.sefl.com FREIGHT LINES OFFICE FOR RATES 1.800.637.7335.
    [Show full text]
  • The Deveiopment and Functions of the Army In
    The development and functions of the army in new Spain, 1760-1798 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Peloso, Vincent C. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 10:56:36 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/319751 THE DEVEIOPMENT AND FUNCTIONS OF THE ARMY IN NEW SPAIN, 1760-1798 Vincent Peloso A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 5 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduc­ tion of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of schol­ arship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter
    List of Surrounding States *For those Chapters that are made up of more than one state we will submit education to the states and surround states of the Chapter. Hawaii accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Virginia will accept Continuing Education hours without prior approval. All Qualifying Education must be approved by them. Offering In Will submit to Alaska Alabama Florida Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Mississippi Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Nevada Utah California Arizona Nevada Oregon Colorado Arizona Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Wyoming Connecticut Massachusetts New Jersey New York Rhode Island District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida Alabama Georgia Georgia Alabama Florida North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Hawaii Iowa Illinois Missouri Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota Wisconsin Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Illinois Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Kentucky Michigan Ohio Wisconsin Kansas Colorado Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Kentucky Illinois Indiana Missouri Ohio Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Texas Massachusetts Connecticut Maine New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Maryland Delaware District of Columbia
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Circle
    Salt Lake City Green River - Moab Salt Lake City - Green River 60min (56mile) Grand Junction 180min (183mile) Colorado Crescent Jct. NM Great Basin Green River NP Arches NP Moab - Arches Goblin Valley 10min (5mile) SP Corona Arch Moab Grand Circle Map Capitol Reef - Green River Dead Horse Point 100min (90mile) SP Moab - Grand View Point NP: National Park 80min (45mile) NM: National Monument NHP: National Histrocal Park Bryce Canyon - Capitol Reef Canyonlands SP: State Park Capitol Reef COLORADO 170min (123mile) NP NP Moab - Mesa Verde Monticello Moab - Monument Valley 170min (140mile) NEVADA UTAH 170min (149mile) Bryce Cedar City Canyon NP Natural Bridges Canyon of the Cedar Breaks NM Blanding Ancients NM Mesa Verde - Monument Valley NM Kodacrome Basin SP 200min (150mile) Valley of Hovenweep 40min 70min NM Cortez (24mile) (60mile) Grand Staircase- the Gods 100min Escalante NM Durango Mt. Carmel (92mile) Muley Point Snow Canyon Jct. SP Goosenecks SP Zion NP Kanab Lake Powell Mexican Hat Mesa Verde Rainbow Monument Valley NP Coral Pink Sand Vermillion Page Bridge NM Four Corners Las Vegas - Zion Dunes SP Cliffs NM Navajo Tribal Park Aztec Ruins NM 170min (167mile) Antelope Pipe Spring NM Horseshoe Shiprock Aztec Bend Canyon Mesa Verde - Chinle 200min (166mile) Mt.Carmel Jct. - North Rim Navajo NM 140min (98mile) Kayenta Farmington Monument Valley - Chinle Mesa Verde - Chaco Culture Valley of Fire Page - North Rim Page - Cameron Page - Monument Valley 140min (134mile) 230min (160mile) SP 170min (124mile) 90min (83mile) Grand Canyon- 130min
    [Show full text]
  • The Deming Axis, Southeastern Arizona, New Mexico and Trans-Pecos Texas Gregory L
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/13 The Deming axis, southeastern Arizona, New Mexico and Trans-Pecos Texas Gregory L. Turner, 1962, pp. 59-71 in: Mogollon Rim Region (East-Central Arizona), Weber, R. H.; Peirce, H. W.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 13th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 175 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1962 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Biden and Trump Are Running Neck and Neck in Arizona, Florida, and Texas
    BIDEN AND TRUMP ARE RUNNING NECK AND NECK IN ARIZONA, FLORIDA, AND TEXAS Ethan Winter Analyst, Data for Progress September 2020 INTRODUCTION Data for Progress, in coordination with the Defend Students Action Fund, conducted polling of the presidential and Senate races across 11 swing states. We also conducted oversamples in Arizona, Florida, and Texas. In addition, we polled various statewide races set for 2022. SWING STATES When we pooled the results of all 11 states surveyed, we find former Vice President leadsPresident Donald Trump by a margin of three-percentage-points. The generic congressional ballot (GCB) is tied at 44 percent. BIDEN AND TRUMP ARE RUNNING NECK AND NECK IN ARIZONA, FLORIDA, AND TEXAS 2 ARIZONA For this November’s election, Trump holds a 1-percentage-point lead over Biden in Arizona. In the Senate race, meanwhile, retired astronaut Mark Kelly is up 9 points over incumbent Senator Martha McSally, who was appointed to serve the duration of the late Senator John McCain’s term. This appointment came after McSally lost a 2018 Senate race to Democrat Krysten Sinema. In the GCB, Democrats trail by three-points. In 2022, Arizona will hold elections for governor and attorney general. In a hypothetical gubernatorial race, voters prefer a generic Republican to a general Democrat, though the margin is narrow (3 points). In 2018, Democrat January Contreras ran for attorney general against Republican Mark Brnovich, and Contreras lost by just over 3 points. In 2022, Brnovich cannot run again due to term limits. In a hypothetical matchup where Contreras runs again for attorney general against a generic Republican candidate, she trails by only 1 point.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Holbrook and the Little Colorado Country (1540-1962)
    A history of Holbrook and the Little Colorado Country (1540-1962) Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Wayte, Harold Columbus, 1926- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 10/10/2021 18:31:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551586 A HISTORY OF HOLBROOK AND THE LITTLE COLORADO COUNTRY . (1540-1962) A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of History in Partial Fulfillment'of the Requirements for the Degree of M aster of Arts b y Harold C. Wayte, Jr. In the Graduate College UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1962 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the m aterial is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
    [Show full text]
  • Luis De Unzaga and Bourbon Reform in Spanish Louisiana, 1770--1776
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 2000 Luis De Unzaga and Bourbon Reform in Spanish Louisiana, 1770--1776. Julia Carpenter Frederick Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Frederick, Julia Carpenter, "Luis De Unzaga and Bourbon Reform in Spanish Louisiana, 1770--1776." (2000). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7355. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7355 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy subm itted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Driver License Manual and CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE
    Arizona Driver License Manual and CUSTOMER SERVICE GUIDE azdot.gov/mvd Douglas A. Ducey, Governor John S. Halikowski, Director Eric R. Jorgensen, Division Director Dear Arizona motorists: The Arizona Department of Transportation Motor Vehicle Division (ADOT MVD) is pleased to provide this guide to Arizona traffic laws and information for obtaining a driver license or identification card. This manual also provides essential safety information for both new and experienced Arizona drivers. ADOT MVD delivers services to millions of Arizona motorists each year. In line with the Division’s vision of getting Arizona “out of the line and safely on the road” we are continuously improving processes to provide swift and efficient service. In addition to coming into an office, ADOT MVD offers alternative methods for Arizonans to access services. For example, two thirds of all transactions, including common ones like registration renewals, sold notices, title transfers, ordering a replacement license, updating insurance information, ordering a motor vehicle record, and more can be done online at AZMVDNow.gov. We also encourage Arizona drivers to take advantage of the more than 160 privately operated Authorized Third Party locations to serve you across the state. Several of these locations offer both Title and Registration and driver license transactions! Find a location convenient for you atazdot.gov/mvdlocations . We look forward to providing you with outstanding customer service and a safe driving experience while we continue our mission of “moving Arizona’s citizens, economy and infrastructure by getting safe drivers and vehicles on the road.” Sincerely, Eric R. Jorgensen Director Motor Vehicle Division ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1801 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of Nevada: Chapter 3
    Political History of Nevada Chapter 3 Historical and Political Data 91 CHAPTER 3: HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL DATA Historical and Political Data: Territorial Governments Through Statehood Reviewed and Updated by ART PALMER Former Research Director of the Legislative Counsel Bureau (LCB) and Former Director of the LCB GUY ROCHA Former Nevada State Archivist ROBERT E. ERICKSON Former Research Director of the LCB In the beginning, the region now occupied by the State of Nevada was held by Data Historical the Goshute, Mojave, Paiute, Shoshone and Washoe Indians and claimed by the Spanish Empire until the early 1800s. Th e northern extent of the Spanish claim was defi ned as the 42nd parallel in the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 between the United States and Spain. Th is north latitude line serves currently as Nevada’s northern boundary with Oregon and Idaho. Spanish explorations into this region have never been documented clearly enough to establish any European party constituting the earliest expedition into Nevada. If in fact there was some penetration, it must have been by the Spanish in the southernmost portion of our state, possibly as early as 1776. In 1821 Mexico won its war of independence from Spain and gained control over all the former Spanish territory in the area of what is now our “South-West.” Spain had done nothing to occupy or control what is now Nevada, a vast region virtually “terra incognita,” having no permanent non-Indian population and considered barren, arid and inhospitable. Quite understandably, the Spanish concentrated on settlements and nominal control in the more accessible and better-known coastal regions of the Californias and New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Wyoming Nevada Colorado Idaho
    Idaho Logan Box Elder Cache 84 15 89 Logan- Brigham City Cache Weber Morgan Wyoming 84 80 Tooele Summit Daggett Davis Salt Lake City International Manila 80 Salt 191 Wendover Tooele Valley Lake Salt Lake City Municipal Heber Vernal City Roosevelt 40 Provo Wasatch 6 Spanish Fork- Duchesne Springville 191 Juab Utah Duchesne Sanpete Nephi Carbon 6 Carbon County Uintah Millard Delta Grand 6 Colorado Manti- Ephriam 50 50 Nevada Filmore Sevier Green River 70 Richfield 24 257 Canyonlands Beaver Piute Wayne Wayne San Juan Wonderland Milford Beaver Hanksville 191 Iron Garfield Panguitch Monticello Cedar City Parowan Escalante Blanding Bryce Canyon Washington Kane 15 89 Cal Black Memorial Kanab 163 St. George Arizona AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC. 1776 South Jackson Street / Suite 950 Denver, Colorado 80210-3802 303.782.0882 / 303.782.0842 fax www.ADGAirports.com INC. AIRPORT GROUP UT DEVELOPMENT SS W www.ADGAirports.com Denver, Colorado 80210-3802 x x x 303.782.0882 / 303.782.0842 fax xx xx xx 1776 South Jackson Street / Suite 950 x x x Ogden, Utah Airport Ogden-Hinckley G R R G C Y Y C INC. AIRPORT GROUP DEVELOPMENT www.ADGAirports.com Denver, Colorado 80210-3802 303.782.0882 / 303.782.0842 fax 1776 South Jackson Street / Suite 950 point 4 x x x Airport Ogden, Utah x x Ogden-Hinckley x x x x x x x x x STOP PROCEED WITH TOWER CLEARANCE ONLY STOP PROCEED WITH TOWER CLEARANCE ONLY x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 0 40 80 Feet AIRPORT DEVELOPMENT INC.
    [Show full text]
  • California Arizona Nevada
    Arizona California Nevada Boating Boater education is recommended but not required. Beginning January 1, 2018, the mandatory boating safety education law goes into effect and Motorboats with motors of 15hp or greater on interstate waters: Any operator born on or Education will be phased in by age. If you operate any type of motorized vessel on California waterways (in- after Jan. 1, 1983 must possess proof of completion of a NASBLA approved boating course Requirement cluding powered sailboats/paddlecraft), you will be required to pass an approved boating safety if operating on Nevada’s interstate waters, including but not limited to Lake Mead, Lake examination and carry a lifetime California Boater Card. Mohave, Lake Tahoe, Topaz Lake and sections of the Colorado River System. Visit CaliforniaBoaterCard.com for phase in schedule and more information. Operator Age, Watercraft with motors greater than 8hp: Watercraft with motors greater than 15hp and sailboats exceeding 30’ in length: PWC: The operator must be at least 14 years of age. and Supervision The operator must be at least 12 years of age. An operator under the Operator must be at least 16 years of age. Operators between the ages of 12-15 must have a Towing: A person operating a vessel that is towing someone on any device must be at least age of 12 must have direct on board supervision by a person who is at person 18 or older on board for supervision. 16 years of age. least 18 years of age. Life Jacket Requirements Age Children age 12 or younger must wear a wearable Coast Guard- Children under 13 years of age on board a recreational vessel of any length must wear a Coast Children under 13 years of age must wear a Coast Guard-approved life jacket whenever the Requirements approved life jacket while the boat is underway.
    [Show full text]